scholarly journals First and second waves among hospitalised patients with COVID-19 with severe pneumonia: a comparison of 28-day mortality over the 1-year pandemic in a tertiary university hospital in Italy

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e054069
Author(s):  
Marianna Meschiari ◽  
Alessandro Cozzi-Lepri ◽  
Roberto Tonelli ◽  
Erica Bacca ◽  
Marianna Menozzi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe first COVID-19–19 epidemic wave was over the period of February–May 2020. Since 1 October 2020, Italy, as many other European countries, faced a second wave. The aim of this analysis was to compare the 28-day mortality between the two waves among COVID-19 hospitalised patients.DesignObservational cohort study. Standard survival analysis was performed to compare all-cause mortality within 28 days after hospital admission in the two waves. Kaplan-Meier curves as well as Cox regression model analysis were used. The effect of wave on risk of death was shown by means of HRs with 95% CIs. A sensitivity analysis around the impact of the circulating variant as a potential unmeasured confounder was performed.SettingUniversity Hospital of Modena, Italy. Patients admitted to the hospital for severe COVID-19 pneumonia during the first (22 February–31 May 2020) and second (1 October–31 December 2020) waves were included.ResultsDuring the two study periods, a total of 1472 patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia were admitted to our hospital, 449 during the first wave and 1023 during the second. Median age was 70 years (IQR 56–80), 37% women, 49% with PaO2/FiO2 <250 mm Hg, 82% with ≥1 comorbidity, median duration of symptoms was 6 days. 28-day mortality rate was 20.0% (95% CI 16.3 to 23.7) during the first wave vs 14.2% (95% CI 12.0 to 16.3) in the second (log-rank test p value=0.03). After including key predictors of death in the multivariable Cox regression model, the data still strongly suggested a lower 28-day mortality rate in the second wave (aHR=0.64, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.90, p value=0.01).ConclusionsIn our hospitalised patients with COVID-19 with severe pneumonia, the 28-day mortality appeared to be reduced by 36% during the second as compared with the first wave. Further studies are needed to identify factors that may have contributed to this improved survival.

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S378-S379
Author(s):  
Guillermo Rodriguez-Nava ◽  
Goar Egoryan ◽  
Daniela Patricia Trelles-Garcia ◽  
Maria Adriana Yanez-Bello ◽  
Qishuo Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Growing evidence supports the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab for the treatment of hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab for the treatment of severe COVID-19 in a community hospital setting. Methods We used a de-identified dataset of hospitalized adults with severe COVID-19 according to the National Institutes of Health definition (SpO2 &lt; 94% on room air, a PaO2/FiO2 &lt; 300 mm Hg, respiratory frequency &gt; 30/min, or lung infiltrates &gt; 50%) admitted to our community hospital located in Evanston Illinois, between March 1, 2020, and March 1, 2021. We performed a Cox proportional hazards regression model to examine the relationship between the use of remdesivir and tocilizumab and inpatient mortality. To minimize confounders, we adjusted for age, qSOFA score, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, invasive mechanical ventilation, and steroids, forcing these variables into the model. We implemented a sensitivity analysis calculating the E-value (with the lower confidence limit) for the obtained point estimates to assess the potential effect of unmeasured confounding. Figure 1. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without steroids The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without remdesivir The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results A total of 549 patients were included. The median age was 69 years (interquartile range, 59 – 80 years), 333 (59.6%) were male, 231 were White (41.3%), and 235 (42%) were admitted from long-term care facilities. 394 (70.5%) received steroids, 192 (34.3%) received remdesivir, and 49 (8.8%) received tocilizumab. By the cutoff date for data analysis, 389 (69.6%) patients survived, and 170 (30.4%) had died. The bivariable Cox regression models showed decreased hazard of in-hospital death associated with the administration of steroids (Figure 1), remdesivir (Figure 2), and tocilizumab (Figure 3). This association persisted in the multivariable Cox regression controlling for other predictors (Figure 4). The E value for the multivariable Cox regression point estimates and the lower confidence intervals are shown in Table 1. Figure 3. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for in-hospital death among patients treated with and without tocilizumab The hazard ratio was derived from a bivariable Cox regression model. The survival curves were compared with a log-rank test, where a two-sided P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Figure 4. Forest plot on effect estimates and confidence intervals for treatments The hazard ratios were derived from a multivariable Cox regression model adjusting for age as a continuous variable, qSOFA score, noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation, and invasive mechanical ventilation. Table 1. Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding using E-values CI, confidence interval. Point estimate from multivariable Cox regression model. The E value is defined as the minimum strength of association on the risk ratio scale that an unmeasured confounder would need to have with both the exposure and the outcome, conditional on the measured covariates, to explain away a specific exposure-outcome association fully: i.e., a confounder not included in the multivariable Cox regression model associated with remdesivir or tocilizumab use and in-hospital death in patients with severe COVID-19 by a hazard ratio of 1.64-fold or 1.54-fold each, respectively, could explain away the lower confidence limit, but weaker confounding could not. Conclusion For patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to our community hospital, the use of steroids, remdesivir, and tocilizumab were significantly associated with a slower progression to in-hospital death while controlling for other predictors included in the models. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 159-170
Author(s):  
Paweł Korczyc ◽  
Jędrzej Chrzanowski ◽  
Arkadiusz Stasiak ◽  
Joanna Stasiak ◽  
Andrzej Bissinger ◽  
...  

Aim: Our study aimed to identify the clinical variables associated with long-term mortality after MI and to construct a simple, easy to use clinical practice model for the prediction of 5 year mortality after MI. Material and Methods: This is a prospective 5-year observation study of MI patients admitted to the Department of Cardiology at the Copernicus Memorial Hospital in Lodz in 2010 and 2011. The data were collected during hospitalization and again after a period of 1 and 5 years. A multi-factor multi-level Cox regression model was constructed to investigate the impact of clinical factors on long-term survival.results: 92 patients (39 STEMI, 53 NSTEMI) were included in the study and their data were used to construct a Cox regression model with satisfactory fit (R 2 =0.7945). Factors associated with a decrease in 5-year risk are: age (1.06, 95%CI: 1.01-1.11), SYNTAX score (1.05, 95%CI: 1.02-1.08), WBC level (1.16, 95%CI: 1.08-1.26), and glycemia at enrollment (1.01, 95%CI: 1.01-1.01). Higher values of HDL at enrollment were associated with a decrease in 5-year risk (HR=0.97, 95%CI: 0.93-0.99).conclusion: The model we created is a valuable tool that is useful and easy to employ in everyday practice for assessing the 5-year prognosis of patients after MI. What is new: The study presents the new model for prediction of 5-year mortality after myocardial infarction. This model is based on simple clinical parameters and may by applied in everyday practice.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 4675-4675
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Raffaella Grasso ◽  
Maurizio Miglino ◽  
Marino Clavio ◽  
Gianmatteo Pica ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 4675 The prognostic value of WT1 expression at diagnosis is still controversial. It has been retrospectively evaluated in 99 consecutive non pretreated non M3 AML patients who had undergone a complete prognostic work up at diagnosis and had received intensive chemotherapy. Biological markers were evaluated on fresh marrow samples collected at diagnosis. WT1 expression was evaluated using TaqMan Gene Expression Assays as described. All patients received induction therapy with combination of fludarabine, Ara-C and anthracycline ± low dose gemtuzumab ozogamicin (n. 59) or with a conventional combination of Ara-C and anthracycline (n. 40) A conventional post-induction chemotherapy including intermediate dosage Ara-C was administered to all responding patients. Univariate comparisons between patients in CR vs non CR were performed using chi-square analysis or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS. The prognostic impact of WT1 expression was evaluated using quartiles as cut off point and selecting the one with the lowest p value. The event free survival and OS were calculated using the Kaplan Meier method. Non CR after the first induction course, relapse and death due to any cause were considered events. OS and EFS duration were calculated from start of treatment. The impact of multiple predictor variables was assessed by multivariate analyses according to the Cox regression model for OS and EFS while for the evaluation of RC was used the Logistic regression model. Median age of patients was 59 years (range 17-81). Cytogenetic alterations were prognostically favorable in 3 patients and belonged to the intermediate prognostic group in 77 patients (normal karyotype in 75 patients and +8 in two). Nineteen patients had a poor prognosis cytogenetics. For statistical analyses we considered two karyotipic groups: unfavorable (19 patients) and not unfavorable (80 patients). CRs were 60/99 (60%), of which 40 in 51 patients aged 60 or less (78%) and 20 in 48 older than 60 years (41%). Twenty-six patients relapsed, 54 are alive, 45 have died, with a median follow up of 360 days (range 20-2300). In Table 1 are reported clinical indicators of outcome being patients grouped according to the percentile of WT1 expression with the lowest p value (75th). Statystical analysis showed that all WT1 quartiles were balanced for other prognostic factors, such as cytogenetics, BAALC expression, FLT3 and NPMA and B mutations, age, blast count and therapy. The lack of consense on the role of WT1 level at diagnosis in the prognostic stratification indicate that further clinical studies are required. The clear correlation between the level of WT1 transcript and the tumor burden explains why WT1 is used in the follow up of leukemic patients as universal marker of residual disease, also in patients with specific chimeric products. On the contrary, the biological explanation of the prognostic impact of WT1 transcript level at diagnosis remains uncertain. Over the years WT1 gene has been considered as an oncogene or a tumor suppressor gene. In our experience the protective influence of high WT1 expression cannot be explained with an association with good prognosis biological features (such as mut NPM and / or low BAALC). The positive prognostic value of high WT1 expression might be implicated either with WT1 antioncogenic function, or with the stimulating effect of WT1 oncogene on leukemic cellular cycle, possibly associated with an enhanced response to chemotherapy.Table 1WT1 <= 2400 N./N.pts (%)WT1 > 2400 N./N.pts (%)p univ,p multiv.*RR (95% CI)CR (all karyotypes)41/ 75 (54)19/24 (82)0,0260.063.364 (0.927-12.202)CR (int/good karyot.)36/59 (61)19/210.010,0276.649 (1.240-35.645)CR (denovo AML int kar)31/45 (69)14/15 (98)0.020,03412.557 (1.218-129.446)CR (denovo, N.K.)26/40 (65)15/16 (94)0.0250.0413.430 (1.111-162.318)EFS at 24 months (all karyotypes)8%6%0.0020.050.486 (0.235-1.007)EFS at 24 months (int / good karyot.)9%64%0.0010.0230.360 (0.150-0.866)EFS at 24 months (de novo, N.K.)5%70%0.0010.0070.227 (0.077-0.671)OS (all karyot)15%55%0,110,660.837 (0.371-1.890)OS (int/good kar.)18%63%0,050,180.507 (0.186-1.381)Table 1 legend: * for multivariate analysis age, karyotype, FLT3, NPM mutation, BAALC expression, denovo/secondary disease were considered. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4804-4804
Author(s):  
Etienne Mahe ◽  
Ariz Akhter ◽  
Danielle H. Oh ◽  
Fahad Farooq ◽  
Meer-Taher Shabani-Rad ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Patients with advanced staged Follicular Lymphoma (FL) are initially managed with either immediate chemoimmunotherapy (CI) or "watchful waiting" (WW) depending on clinical symptoms, tumor burden, and organ compromise. Clinicians currently predict time to progression (TTP) using the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score. Well-defined & validated molecular techniques capable of additional predictive power are lacking, however. We hypothesized that gene-expression (GE) data, employing an evidence-based feature set, might assist in the upfront stratification of FL patients. Objectives 1 Identify genes whose GE has previously been identified as relevant to FL 2 Perform GE testing on an series of FL cases, classified by upfront intervention, using this custom gene feature set 3 Identify the gene(s) most strongly predictive of disease progression in each of the clinical classes (i.e. CI vs. WW) 4 Compare the performance of GE data to other prognostic parameters Methods We performed a search of MEDLINE-indexed studies reporting FL GE results. We input all available appertaining data into NVIVO (v10), in which a computer-assisted search for GE features was performed. This list, after refinement, formed the basis of a custom NanoString codeset. We used the MD Anderson Microarray Sample Size Calculator for sample size estimation and retrieved FL cases from our regional archives; those cases with sufficient tissue were organized by upfront treatment approach and available clinical data recorded (age at diagnosis, sex, stage, grade, FLIPI scores & TTP). TTP was defined as time in months either to diagnosed disease progression or, in the WW group, first CI-based treatment. After pathology review, RNA was isolated using standard protocols. GE data was analyzed using gene-specific receiver-operating characteristic analysis, ranking performed according to the area-under-the-curve (MATLAB v 8.3.0.532). Validation against TTP using Cox-regression was then performed (SPSS v22); p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results Our MEDLINE search yielded 713 publications; after refinement, our NVIVO analysis suggested 282 valid gene features. Review of local FL cases accessioned between 2004 & 2012 was performed; this period ensured uniform follow-up and CI treatment strategies for all FL patients. Patients were classified as WW (68 patients) & CI (98 patients), and then sub-classified as WW1 (WW without need for CI over the follow-up interval; 23 patients) and WW2 (WW requiring CI in the follow-up interval; 45 patients) and CI1 (CI without disease progression over the follow-up interval; 61 patients) and CI2 (CI with disease progression; 37 patients). Median follow-up time was 60 months in the WW group and 56 months in the CI group (Mann-Whitney p = 0.177). With the exception of FLIPI score in the WW class (higher on average in the WW2 sub-class), no other clinical factor differed significantly between the sub-classes. GE analyses suggested that ACTB in the WW group and MEK1 in the CI group might be most predictive of TTP. Table 1. TTP results by Cox-regression analysis for the WW group WW Variable Cox-Regression Model Co-efficient p-value Cox-Regression Model Linear Co-efficient 95% CI Age at diagnosis 0.56 0.98-1.04 Sex 0.34 0.67-3.19 Tumor Grade 0.41 0.40-9.48 Tumor Stage 0.54 0.69-2.04 FLIPI Score 0.06 0.97-3.6 ACTB Expression 0.006 1.4-7.74 Table 2. TTP results by cox-regression analysis for the CI group CI Variable Cox-Regression Model Co-efficient p-value Cox-Regression Model Linear Co-efficient 95% CI Age at diagnosis 0.34 0.99-1.04 Sex 0.96 0.48-2.16 Tumor Grade 0.92 0.43-2.13 Tumor Stage 0.17 0.874-2.11 FLIPI Score 0.4 0.47-1.35 MEK1 Expression 0.011 0.19-0.81 Conclusions To our knowledge, we have performed the first GE analysis of FL cases classified by intervention, and have identified GE features predictive of disease progression or requirement of intervention (as in the WW group). In the CI group, identification of MEK1 as a major prognostic player echoes previous work studying the MAP-kinase pathway in FL. In the WW group, however, identification of ACTB as a potential prognostic player is a novel observation requiring validation, especially since this gene is ubiquitously expressed across multiple cell types. Figure 1. WW TTP, stratified by ACTB expression Figure 1. WW TTP, stratified by ACTB expression Figure 2. CI TTP, stratified by MEK1 expression Figure 2. CI TTP, stratified by MEK1 expression Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huamao Ye ◽  
Xiang Feng ◽  
Yang Wang ◽  
Rui Chen ◽  
Meimian Hua ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The effect of diagnostic ureteroscopy (DURS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) were controversial. To investigate the impact of DURS, we carried out this single-center retrospective study by applying propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox regression model. Patients and Methods: The data of 160 patients with pTa-pT3 upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) were analyzed. Eighty-six patients underwent DURS (DURS group) and 74 patients without DURS (control group). The DURS group was further sub-grouped into synchronous DURS group (DURS followed by immediate RNU, n=45) and non-synchronous DURS group (DURS followed by delayed RNU, n=41). Baseline confounders were corrected by PSM. The impact of DURS on IVR was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis in PSM cohort and by Cox regression model in the full data set. Results: The median follow-up time was 40.4 months. No difference of the 3-year IVRFS between DURS group and control group (72.6% vs. 65.3%, p=0.263). In subgroup analysis, the 3-year IVR-free survival of non-synchronous DURS group (51.4%) was significantly lower than that of synchronous DURS (78.3%) or control group (72.6%) (p=0.027). Further Cox regression analysis showed that non-synchronous DURS (HR 1.481, 95% CI 1.031-2.127, p=0.034) was independent risk factors for postoperative IVR. Conclusions: Non-synchronous DURS was not recommended for the diagnosis and preoperative evaluation of UTUC, because it could raise the risk of IVR after RNU. For UTUC patients in need of DURS, synchronous DURS could be a safer choice than the non-synchronous DURS in terms of lowering the IVR risk.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ilad Alavi Darazam ◽  
Firouze Hatami ◽  
Mohammad Mahdi Rabiei ◽  
Mohamad Amin Pourhoseingholi ◽  
Minoosh Shabani ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a serious obstacle in front of public health. Interferon-beta 1a (IFN-β 1a) has been used to treat patients with COVID-19. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of high dose IFN-β 1a compared to low dose IFN-β 1a (the base therapeutic regimen) in moderate to severe COVID-19 cases.Methods: In this randomized, controlled, and clinical trial, eligible patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections were randomly assigned to receive one of the two following therapeutic regimens: The intervention group was treated with high dose IFN-β 1a (Recigen) (Subcutaneous injections of 88μg (24,000 IU) on days 1, 3, 6) + lopinavir /ritonavir (Kaletra) and the control group was treated with low dose IFN-β 1a (Recigen) (Subcutaneous injections of 44μg (12,000 IU) on days 1, 3, 6) + lopinavir /ritonavir (Kaletra) (400mg/100 mg twice a day for 10 days, orally, in all two groups). Result:A total of 168 COVID- 19 confirmed patients underwent randomization; 83 were assigned to the intervention group and 85 were assigned to the control group. Median Time To Clinical Improvement (TTIC) for cases treated with low dose of IFN-β1a was shorter than that for cases treated with high dose of IFN-β1a (6 vs10 days; P=0.018). Hazard Ratio for TTCI in the Cox regression model was 1.56 (95% CI: 1.05-2.30, P-value=0.026). Due to differences between some baseline clinical factors between intervention and control group, we; therefore, performed an adjusted analysis by including spo2, D-dimer and CRP in Cox regression model. The model failed to reach a significant difference between two groups. The adjusted HR was 1.37 (95% CI: 0.88-2.12, P-value=0.16). No difference was observed in terms of mortality between two groups. ConclusionThe use of high-dose IFN-β 1a did not improve TTCI in hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19. Also, it has not any significant effect in mortality reduction compared with treating with low-dose IFN-β 1a.Trial registration: The trial was confirmed by the Ethics in Medical Research Committee of the Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences. signed informed consents were obtained from all the participants or their legally authorized representatives. This trial has been registered as ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04521400.


PeerJ ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. e6350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianfei Fu ◽  
Hang Ruan ◽  
Hongjuan Zheng ◽  
Cheng Cai ◽  
Shishi Zhou ◽  
...  

Objective This study was performed to identify a reasonable cutoff age for defining older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and to examine whether old age was related with increased colorectal cancer-specific death (CSD) and poor colorectal cancer-specific survival (CSS). Methods A total of 76,858 eligible patients from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) database were included in this study. The Cox proportional hazard regression model and the Chow test were used to determine a suitable cutoff age for defining the older group. Furthermore, a propensity score matching analysis was performed to adjust for heterogeneity between groups. A competing risk regression model was used to explore the impact of age on CSD and non-colorectal cancer-specific death (non-CSD). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were plotted to compare CSS between groups. Also, a Cox regression model was used to validate the results. External validation was performed on data from 1998 to 2003 retrieved from the SEER database. Results Based on a cutoff age of 70 years, the examined cohort of patients was classified into a younger group (n = 51,915, <70 years of old) and an older group (n = 24,943, ≥70 years of old). Compared with younger patients, older patients were more likely to have fewer lymph nodes sampled and were less likely to receive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. When adjusted for other covariates, age-dependent differences of 5-year CSD and 5-year non-CSD were significant in the younger and older groups (15.84% and 22.42%, P < 0.001; 5.21% and 14.21%, P < 0.001). Also an age of ≥70 years remained associated with worse CSS comparing with younger group (subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.51 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.45–1.57], P < 0.001). The Cox regression model as a sensitivity analysis had a similar result. External validation also supported an age of 70 years as a suitable cutoff, and this older group was associated with having reduced CSS and increased CSD. Conclusions A total of 70 is a suitable cutoff age to define those considered as having elderly CRC. Elderly CRC was associated with not only increased non-CSD but also with increased CSD. Further research is needed to provide evidence of whether cases of elderly CRC should receive stronger treatment if possible.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14163-e14163
Author(s):  
Ikenna Osuorji ◽  
Greg Dyson ◽  
Durga Yerasuri ◽  
Philip Agop Philip ◽  
Anthony Frank Shields ◽  
...  

e14163 Background: Metastatic colorectal disease is generally incurable and treatment is palliative with the intent to balance toxicity with quality of life. Coin 3 trial showed that pre-chemotherapy platelet counts > 400,000 per μL were associated with poor survival when intermittent chemotherapy was used, whereas patients with lower platelet counts did not have any significant difference between the intermittent and continuous chemotherapy arms. Methods: We reviewed retrospectively 775 stage IV colorectal cancer patients at Karmanos Cancer Center over a 10 year period to see if high platelet count was associated with a poor outcome irrespective of treatment. Our analysis included 480 patients with adenocarcinoma who had not received chemotherapy prior to referral, and where information on the baseline platelet count, race, and age was available. We also analyzed the impact of race, age and bevacizumab use. We used Cox regression model for analysis. Results: Among the patients 48.3% were African American (AA) and 51.7% were Caucasians (C). 34.4 % had had PLT > 400,000 per μL. For those with lower platelet counts the median survival was 26.2 months in the C and 14.1 months in the AA groups respectively. Patients with platelet above 400,000 had a median survival of 15.2 months for C and 12.6 months for AA. Cox regression analysis, showed hazard ratios for outcome of death were; 1.16(1.07-1.26) p<0.001 for age (per 10 yrs), 1.60(1.31-1.94) [AA versus C(ref)] p< 0.001 for race and 1.35(1.10-1.65)[>400 versus <] p<0.004 for platelet count. In subset analysis, 296(61.7%) patients who received chemotherapy had data regarding use of bevacizumab (B). Among the 31.7% who received B, the median survival was 25.6 months compared to14.1 months in the no B arm. A Cox regression model using B as a stratification variable showed that the impact of race {hazard ratio = 1.32 (1.02-1.69) p =0.03} and platelet count {hazard ratio = 1.27(0.97-1.65) p =0.08} were much less. Conclusions: Pre-chemotherapy Platelet count< 400,000, C race and younger age are associated with improved survival. Use of bevacizumab may mitigate the impact of these factors.


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-485
Author(s):  
Nathan J. Winans ◽  
Justine J. Liang ◽  
Bradley Ashcroft ◽  
Stephen Doyle ◽  
Adam Fry ◽  
...  

OBJECTIVESevere traumatic brain injury (sTBI) carries significant morbidity and mortality. It remains difficult to counsel families on functional prognosis and plan research initiatives aimed at treating traumatic coma. In order to better address these problems, the authors set out to develop statistical models using retrospective data to identify admission characteristics that correlate with time until the return of consciousness, defined as the time to follow commands (TFC). These results were then used to create a TFC score, allowing for rapid identification of patients with predicted prolonged TFC.METHODSData were reviewed and collected from medical records of sTBI patients with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) motor subscores ≤ 5 who were admitted to Stony Brook University Hospital from January 2011 to July 2018. Data were used to calculate descriptive statistics and build binary logistic regression models to identify admission characteristics that correlated with in-hospital mortality and in-hospital command-following. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify admission characteristics that correlated with the length of TFC. A TFC score was developed using the significant variables identified in the Cox regression model.RESULTSThere were 402 adult patients who met the inclusion criteria for this study. The average age was 50.5 years, and 122 (30.3%) patients were women. In-hospital mortality was associated with older age, higher Injury Severity Score (ISS), higher Rotterdam score (head CT grading system), and the presence of bilateral fixed and dilated pupils (p < 0.01). In-hospital command-following was anticorrelated with age, ISS, Rotterdam score, and the presence of a single fixed and dilated pupil (p < 0.05). TFC was anticorrelated with age, ISS, Rotterdam score, and the presence of a single fixed and dilated pupil. Additionally, patients who sustained injuries from falls from standing height had a shorter average TFC. The 3 significant variables from the Cox regression model that explained the most variance were used to create a 4-point TFC score. The most significant of these characteristics were Rotterdam head CT scores, high impact traumas, and the presence of a single fixed and dilated pupil. Importantly, the presence of a single fixed and dilated pupil was correlated with longer TFC but no increase in likelihood of in-hospital mortality.CONCLUSIONSThe creation of the 4-point TFC score will allow clinicians to quickly identify patients with predicted prolonged TFC and estimate the likelihood of command-following at different times after injury. Discussions with family members should take into account the likelihood that patients will return to consciousness and survive after TBI.


Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 135 (16) ◽  
pp. 1386-1395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes Schetelig ◽  
Henning Baldauf ◽  
Falk Heidenreich ◽  
Carolin Massalski ◽  
Sandra Frank ◽  
...  

Abstract Several studies suggest that harnessing natural killer (NK) cell reactivity mediated through killer cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) could reduce the risk of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Based on one promising model, information on KIR2DS1 and KIR3DL1 and their cognate ligands can be used to classify donors as KIR-advantageous or KIR-disadvantageous. This study was aimed at externally validating this model in unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation. The impact of the predictor on overall survival (OS) and relapse incidence was tested in a Cox regression model adjusted for patient age, a modified disease risk index, Karnofsky performance status, donor age, HLA match, sex match, cytomegalovirus match, conditioning intensity, type of T-cell depletion, and graft type. Data from 2222 patients with acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome were analyzed. KIR genes were typed by using high-resolution amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. In univariable analyses and subgroup analyses, OS and the cumulative incidence of relapse of patients with a KIR-advantageous donor were comparable to patients with a KIR-disadvantageous donor. The adjusted hazard ratio from the multivariable Cox regression model was 0.99 (Wald test, P = .93) for OS and 1.04 (Wald test, P = .78) for relapse incidence. We also tested the impact of activating donor KIR2DS1 and inhibition by KIR3DL1 separately but found no significant impact on OS and the risk of relapse. Thus, our study shows that the proposed model does not universally predict NK-mediated disease control. Deeper knowledge of NK-mediated alloreactivity is necessary to predict its contribution to graft-versus-leukemia reactions and to eventually use KIR genotype information for donor selection.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document