scholarly journals Lung cancer and end-of-life care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of aggressive inpatient care

2019 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2019-001770
Author(s):  
Olivier Bylicki ◽  
Morgane Didier ◽  
Frederic Riviere ◽  
Jacques Margery ◽  
Frederic Grassin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
English Language ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Early Management ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Over Time

ObjectivesDespite recent advances in thoracic oncology, most patients with metastatic lung cancer die within months of diagnosis. Aggressiveness of their end-of-life (EOL) care has been the subject of numerous studies. This study was undertaken to evaluate the literature on aggressive inpatient EOL care for lung cancer and analyse the evolution of its aggressiveness over time.MethodsA systematic international literature search restricted to English-language publications used terms associated with aggressiveness of care, EOL and their synonyms. Two independent researchers screened for eligibility and extracted all data and another a random 10% sample of the abstracts. Electronic Medline and Embase databases were searched (2000–20 September 2018). EOL-care aggressiveness was defined as follows: 1) chemotherapy administered during the last 14 days of life (DOL) or new chemotherapy regimen during the last 30 DOL; 2) >2 emergency department visits; 3) >1 hospitalisation during the last 30 DOL; 4) ICU admission during the last 30 DOL and 5) palliative care started <3 days before death.ResultsAmong the 150 articles identified, 42 were retained for review: 1 clinical trial, 3 observational cohorts, 21 retrospective analyses and 17 administrative data-based studies. The percentage of patients subjected to aggressive therapy seems to have increased over time. Early management by palliative care teams seems to limit aggressive care.ConclusionsOur analysis indicated very frequent aggressive EOL care for patients with lung cancer, regardless of the definition used. The extent of that aggressiveness and its impact on healthcare costs warrant further studies.

Retrospective review of end-of-life care in the last month of life in older patients with multiple myeloma: what collaboration between haematologists and palliative care teams?

2020 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002293
Author(s):  
Thomas Chalopin ◽  
Nicolas Vallet ◽  
Lotfi Benboubker ◽  
Marlène Ochmann ◽  
Emmanuel Gyan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Care Family ◽  
Eol Care

ObjectivesPatients with haematological malignancies (HM) receive more aggressive treatments near the end-of-life (EOL) than patients with solid tumours. Palliative care (PC) needs are less widely acknowledged in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) than in other HM. The main objective of our study was to describe EOL care and PC referral in a population of older patients with MM.MethodsWe retrospectively included deceased inpatients and outpatients with an MM previously diagnosed at the age of 70 and over in two tertiary centres in France. We reported EOL characteristics regarding treatments considered to be aggressive—antimyeloma therapies, hospitalisations, blood product transfusions, intensive care units (ICUs) or emergency admissions—and PC referral.ResultsWe included 119 patients. In their last month of life, 75 (63%) were hospitalised for fever, pain, asthenia, anaemia or bleeding, 49 (41%) were admitted in the emergency department and 12 (10%) in ICU, 76 (64%) still received antimyeloma therapy and 45 (38%) had at least two transfusions. Only 24 (20%) received PC intervention for pain, global care, family support, anxiety, social care or confusion. Median follow-up until death was 20 days.ConclusionsOur study found a high rate of hospitalisations and antimyeloma therapies in the last month of life. The PC referral rate was low, often once specific treatments were stopped. Our results suggest the need for more effective collaboration between PC teams and haematologists in order to respond to the specific needs of these patients and to improve their quality of care at EOL.

Impact of palliative care on end-of-life management of cancer patients dying in the hospital.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20613-e20613
Author(s):  
Syed Mustafa Karim ◽  
Jamal M Zekri ◽  
Ehab Mosaad Abdelghany ◽  
Azhar Rizvi ◽  
Aboelkhair Al-Gahmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Time Of Death ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Palliative Care Services ◽  
Chi Square Test ◽  
Eol Care

e20613 Background: A substantial number of cancer patients receive inpatient care at the end-of-life (EoL). Involvement of palliative care teams during the course of cancer treatment has been shown to improve quality of life (QoL) in cancer patients. In this study, we compare the EoL care of cancer patients dying in the hospital under medical oncology (MO) and palliative care (PC) services. Methods: A retrospective review of medical records of adult cancer patients who received chemotherapy during their illness and died in our hospital between January 2010 and January 2012 was conducted. The quality metrics measured as endpoints were: chemotherapy given within 21 days of death, death in the ICU, CPR at time of death, and time from last chemotherapy to death (TLCD). These endpoints were compared between patients who died under the MO service (cohort A) and those dying under PC service (cohort B). Chi-square test and T-test were used to compare the endpoints between the two cohorts. Results: Of the 106 cancer patients who died in the hospital, 40 and 66 were in cohorts A and B respectively. 30% of all patients were 65 years of age or older, and were equally distributed between the two cohorts. Patients in cohort A were more likely to receive chemotherapy within last 3 weeks of life (27.5% versus 7.5%, p=0.012, 95% CI 4.16-37.15), to have CPR at time of death (15% versus 0%, p=0.005, 95% CI 4.2-29.8) and to die in the ICU (52.5% versus 1.5%, p=<0.001, 95% CI 33.3-67.1) as compared to patients in cohort B. The average time from last chemotherapy to death was significantly longer (221 days) for cohort B patients as compared to cohort A patients (96 days), p=0.01. Patients in cohort A who had PC consultation during their hospitalization had no differences in the measured endpoints when compared to patients in cohort B. Conclusions: Cancer patients who die in the hospital while under MO service without PC involvement tend to have more aggressive EoL care. This may impact negatively on some QoL features. Early referral to palliative care services may facilitate better understanding and fulfillment of the needs of cancer patients and their caregivers by the healthcare-providers.

Opportunities for improved end-of-life (EOL) care for adult patients with advanced cancer: Results of a longitudinal assessment of care provided by Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) participants.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9537-9537
Author(s):  
David W. Dougherty ◽  
Pamela Kadlubek ◽  
Trang Pham ◽  
Craig Earle ◽  
Jennifer Malin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Trend Test ◽  
Chemotherapy Administration ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Over Time

9537 Background: End of life care of patients with advanced cancer has received recent attention because of evidence of widespread variation in utilization of aggressive therapies and interventions and possible suboptimal use of palliative care and hospice services. QOPI, the ASCO sponsored quality assessment program, has been available to all United States physician members since January 2006 and has assessed EOL care since its inception. The current analysis explores whether the increased national focus on EOL and increased availability of palliative care and hospice services has resulted in improvements in EOL care as reported by QOPI participants. Methods: Data was aggregated across all EOL care quality measures for 9 sequential semi-annual QOPI collection periods from 2008 through 2012. Trends were analyzed among rates of eligible patients related to hospice enrollment and timing of enrollment, palliative care referrals, discussions about hospice and palliative care, and chemotherapy administration at the end of life. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed to determine the significance of trends and differences in measure performance over time. Results: From Fall 2008 to Fall 2012, the rate of hospice enrollment for appropriate patients improved by 7.4% [51.8% to 59.2%; p<0.0001] and the rate of hospice enrollment or palliative care referral improved by 5.6% [63.3% to 68.9%; p<0.0001]. Modest improvements were seen in the rates of hospice enrollment more than 3 and 7 days before death [2.8%, 2.6%], discussion of hospice or palliative care with patients not referred for these services within the last 2 months of life [2.7% increase; 19% to 21.7%], and chemotherapy administration within the last 2 weeks of life [2.4% improvement from 13.7% to 11.3%]. Conclusions: Despite modest increases in the rate of hospice enrollment and palliative care referrals over time, EOL care for adult patients with cancer associated with QOPI practices remains suboptimal. Opportunities exist to increase more meaningful participation in hospice and palliative care and to reduce exposure to chemotherapy near death.

Palliative care as a predictor of healthcare resource use at end-of-life in adult Albertan lung cancer decedents between 2008-2015: A secondary data analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24009-e24009
Author(s):  
Nureen Sumar ◽  
Madalene Earp ◽  
Desiree Hao ◽  
Aynharan Sinnarajah
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Resource Use ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Strong Association ◽  
Specialist Palliative Care ◽  
Healthcare Resource Use ◽  
Aggressive Care ◽  
Aggressive Interventions

e24009 Background: Early utilization of specialist palliative care (SPC) in cancer patients may reduce healthcare resource use, aggressive interventions, and costs at end-of-life. We evaluated the impact of SPC on healthcare resource utilization and aggressive interventions at end-of-life in patients who have died from lung cancer. Methods: Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted on lung cancer decedents in the Calgary Zone, Alberta Health Services from 2008 to 2015. The primary exposure was timing of SPC (Early: receipt of SPC > = 90 days before death; Late: < 90 days before death; No SPC). The primary outcome was end-of-life healthcare resource use (defined as any of: hospital death, > 1 emergency department visit, > 1 hospital admission, > 14 days of hospitalization, ≥1 intensive care unit admission, ≥1 new chemotherapy program (or any chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life) in the 30 days prior to death. Results: There were 3300 patients of which the majority (51.6%) of decedents were male. More female versus male lung cancer decedents (36.4% vs 28.7%) received early SPC. After adjusting for confounders, a strong association was found between early, late or no SPC and end-of-life healthcare resource use (ORno exposure 3.25 (95% CI 2.41-4.40) vs ORlate exposure 2.44 (95% CI 2.03-2.92) compared to those with early SPC; p < 0.001). Males had 1.53 the odds of aggressive care at end-of-life compared to females (p < 0.001). Stratified analysis by sex revealed a strong association between the absence of SPC utilization and end-of-life healthcare resource use. Young age ( < 50 at death) was a strong driver of aggressive care at end-of-life in females versus males [OR 5.44 vs 2.53]. Conclusions: Early specialist palliative care was significantly associated with less end-of-life healthcare resource use in both male and female lung cancer decedents, with less early specialist palliative care use in males. Keywords: palliative care, early palliative care, cancer, end-of-life, healthcare resource use, lung cancer.

Opportunities for improved end-of-life (EOL) care for adult patients with advanced cancer: Results of a longitudinal assessment of care provided by Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) participants.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 132-132
Author(s):  
David W. Dougherty ◽  
Pamela Kadlubek ◽  
Trang Pham ◽  
Craig Earle ◽  
Jennifer Malin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Advanced Cancer ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Trend Test ◽  
Chemotherapy Administration ◽  
Hospice And Palliative Care ◽  
Eol Care ◽  
Over Time

132 Background: End of life care of patients with advanced cancer has received recent attention because of evidence of widespread variation in utilization of aggressive therapies and interventions and possible suboptimal use of palliative care and hospice services. QOPI, the ASCO sponsored quality assessment program, has been available to all United States physician members since January 2006 and has assessed EOL care since its inception. The current analysis explores whether the increased national focus on EOL and increased availability of palliative care and hospice services has resulted in improvements in EOL care as reported by QOPI participants. Methods: Data was aggregated across all EOL care quality measures for 9 sequential semi-annual QOPI collection periods from 2008 through 2012. Trends were analyzed among rates of eligible patients related to hospice enrollment and timing of enrollment, palliative care referrals, discussions about hospice and palliative care, and chemotherapy administration at the end of life. The Cochran-Armitage trend test was performed to determine the significance of trends and differences in measure performance over time. Results: From Fall 2008 to Fall 2012, the rate of hospice enrollment for appropriate patients improved by 7.4% [51.8% to 59.2%; p<0.0001] and the rate of hospice enrollment or palliative care referral improved by 5.6% [63.3% to 68.9%; p<0.0001]. Modest improvements were seen in the rates of hospice enrollment more than 3 and 7 days before death [2.8%, 2.6%], discussion of hospice or palliative care with patients not referred for these services within the last 2 months of life [2.7% increase; 19% to 21.7%], and chemotherapy administration within the last 2 weeks of life [2.4% improvement from 13.7% to 11.3%]. Conclusions: Despite modest increases in the rate of hospice enrollment and palliative care referrals over time, EOL care for adult patients with cancer associated with QOPI practices remains suboptimal. Opportunities exist to increase more meaningful participation in hospice and palliative care and to reduce exposure to chemotherapy near death.

Trends in aggressive care at the end-of-life for stage IV lung cancer patients.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6614-6614
Author(s):  
Chebli Mrad ◽  
Marwan S Abougergi ◽  
Robert Michael Daly
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Metastatic Lung Cancer ◽  
Lung Cancer Patients ◽  
Metastatic Lung ◽  
Aggressive Care

6614 Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that high-intensity end-of-life care improves neither survival nor quality of life for cancer patients. The National Quality Forum endorses dying from cancer in an acute care setting, ICU admission in the last 30 days of life, and chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life as markers of poor quality care. Methods: Discharge data from the National Inpatient Sample database was analyzed for 3,030,866 acute care hospitalizations of metastatic lung cancer patients between 1998 and 2014. Longitudinal analysis was conducted to determine trends in aggressive care at the end-of-life and multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine associations with age, race, region, hospital characteristics, and aggressive care. Results: In-hospital mortality for metastatic lung cancer patients decreased from 17% to 11%. Among terminal hospitalizations, utilization of radiation therapy and chemotherapy decreased from 4.6% to 3.0% and from 4.8% to 3.0%, respectively. However, the proportion admitted to the ICU increased from 13.3% to 27.9% and invasive procedures increased from 1.2% to 2.0%. Reflecting this aggressive end-of-life care, mean total charges for a terminal hospitalization rose from $29,386 to $72,469, adjusted for inflation. Among patients who died in the inpatient setting, the ICU stay translated into higher total costs (+$16,962, CI: $15,859 to $18,064) compared to patients who avoided the ICU. Promisingly, palliative care encounters for terminal hospitalizations increased during this period from 8.7% to 53.0% and was correlated with a decrease in inpatient chemotherapy (OR = 0.56, CI: 0.47 to 0.68), radiotherapy (OR = 0.77, CI: 0.65 to 0.92), and ICU admissions (OR = 0.48, CI: 0.45 to 0.53) but had only a modest impact on terminal hospitalization cost (-$2,992, CI: -$3,710 to -$2,275). Multivariable analysis showed variation by patient and hospital characteristics in aggressive care utilization. Conclusions: Among patients with metastatic lung cancer there has been a substantial increase in ICU use during terminal hospitalizations, resulting in high cost for the health care system. Inpatient palliative care has the potential to reduce aggressive end-of-life interventions.

scholarly journals Health care Professionals’ Experiences and Needs When Delivering End-of-Life Care to Children: A Qualitative Study

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 117822421772477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Bergsträsser ◽  
Eva Cignacco ◽  
Patricia Luck
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Structural Problems ◽  
Palliative Care Teams ◽  
Specialized Palliative Care ◽  
Eol Care

Pediatric end-of-life care (EOL care) entails challenging tasks for health care professionals (HCPs). Little is known about HCPs’ experiences and needs when providing pediatric EOL care in Switzerland. This study aimed to describe the experiences and needs of HCPs in pediatric EOL care in Switzerland and to develop recommendations for the health ministry. The key aspect in EOL care provision was identified as the capacity to establish a relationship with the dying child and the family. Barriers to this interaction were ethical dilemmas, problems in collaboration with the interprofessional team, and structural problems on the level of organizations. A major need was the expansion of vocational training and support by specialized palliative care teams. We recommend the development of a national concept for the provision of EOL care in children, accompanied by training programs and supported by specialized pediatric palliative care teams located in tertiary children’s hospitals.

scholarly journals End of life breast cancer care in women with severe mental illnesses

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillaume Fond ◽  
Vanessa Pauly ◽  
Audrey Duba ◽  
Sebastien Salas ◽  
Marie Viprey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Health Disparities ◽  
Major Depression ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
High Intensity ◽  
Bipolar Disorders ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Targeted Interventions ◽  
Eol Care

AbstractLittle is known on the end-of-life (EOL) care of terminal breast cancer in women with severe psychiatric disorder (SPD). The objective was to determine if women with SPD and terminal breast cancer received the same palliative and high-intensity care during their end-of-life than women without SPD. Study design, setting, participants. This population-based cohort study included all women aged 15 and older who died from breast cancer in hospitals in France (2014–2018). Key measurements/outcomes. Indicators of palliative care and high-intensity EOL care. Multivariable models were performed, adjusted for age at death, year of death, social deprivation, duration between cancer diagnosis and death, metastases, comorbidity, smoking addiction and hospital category. The analysis included 1742 women with SPD (287 with bipolar disorder, 1075 with major depression and 380 with schizophrenia) and 36,870 women without SPD. In multivariate analyses, women with SPD had more palliative care (adjusted odd ratio aOR 1.320, 95%CI [1.153–1.511], p < 0.001), longer palliative care follow-up before death (adjusted beta = 1.456, 95%CI (1.357–1.555), p < 0.001), less chemotherapy, surgery, imaging/endoscopy, and admission in emergency department and intensive care unit. Among women with SPD, women with bipolar disorders and schizophrenia died 5 years younger than those with recurrent major depression. The survival time was also shortened in women with schizophrenia. Despite more palliative care and less high-intensity care in women with SPD, our findings also suggest the existence of health disparities in women with bipolar disorders and schizophrenia compared to women with recurrent major depression and without SPD. Targeted interventions may be needed for women with bipolar disorders and schizophrenia to prevent these health disparities.

Help Me Understand: Providing Palliative Care to Individuals With Serious Mental Illness

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110107
Author(s):  
Kate L. M. Hinrichs ◽  
Cindy B. Woolverton ◽  
Jordana L. Meyerson
Keyword(s):  
Mental Illness ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
End Of Life Care ◽  
Psychosocial Support ◽  
Life Care ◽  
Case Examples ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Palliative Care Teams

Individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) have shortened life expectancy with increased risk of developing comorbid medical illnesses. They might have difficulty accessing care and can be lost to follow-up due to complex socioeconomic factors, placing them at greater risk of dying from chronic or undiagnosed conditions. This, in combination with stigma associated with SMI, can result in lower quality end-of-life care. Interdisciplinary palliative care teams are in a unique position to lend assistance to those with SMI given their expertise in serious illness communication, values-based care, and psychosocial support. However, palliative care teams might be unfamiliar with the hallmark features of the various SMI diagnoses. Consequently, recognizing and managing exacerbations of SMI while delivering concurrent palliative or end-of-life care can feel challenging. The goal of this narrative review is to describe the benefits of providing palliative care to individuals with SMI with concrete suggestions for communication and use of recovery-oriented language in the treatment of individuals with SMI. The salient features of 3 SMI diagnoses—Bipolar Disorders, Major Depressive Disorder, and Schizophrenia—are outlined through case examples. Recommendations for working with individuals who have SMI and other life-limiting illness are provided, including strategies to effectively manage SMI exacerbations.

Cannabis and End-of-Life Care: A Snapshot of Hospice Planning and Experiences Among Illinois Medical Cannabis Patients With A Terminal Diagnosis

2021 ◽  
pp. 104990912110186
Author(s):  
James Alton Croker ◽  
Julie Bobitt ◽  
Sara Sanders ◽  
Kanika Arora ◽  
Keith Mueller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Hospice Care ◽  
Cannabis Use ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Medical Cannabis ◽  
Cross Sectional Survey ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Eol Care

Introduction: Between 2013 and 2019, Illinois limited cannabis access to certified patients enrolled in the Illinois Medical Cannabis Program (IMCP). In 2016, the state instituted a fast-track pathway for terminal patients. The benefits of medicinal cannabis (MC) have clear implications for patients near end-of-life (EOL). However, little is known about how terminal patients engage medical cannabis relative to supportive care. Methods: Anonymous cross-sectional survey data were collected from 342 terminal patients who were already enrolled in ( n = 19) or planning to enroll ( n = 323) in hospice for EOL care. Logistic regression models compare patients in the sample on hospice planning vs. hospice enrollment, use of palliative care vs. hospice care, and use standard care vs non-hospice palliative care. Results: In our sample, cancer patients ( OR = 0.21 (0.11), p < .01), and those who used the fast-track application into the IMCP ( OR = 0.11 (0.06), p < .001) were less likely to be enrolled in hospice. Compared to patients in palliative care, hospice patients were less likely to report cancer as their qualifying condition ( OR = 0.16 (0.11), p < .01), or entered the IMCP via the fast-track ( OR = 0.23 (0.15), p < .05). Discussion: Given low hospice enrollment in a fairly large EOL sample, cannabis use may operate as an alternative to supportive forms of care like hospice and palliation. Clinicians should initiate conversations about cannabis use with their patients while also engaging EOL Care planning discussions as an essential part of the general care plan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document