Sarcopenia and anthracycline cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2021-003197
Author(s):  
Onur Bas ◽  
Ahmet Gurkan Erdemir ◽  
Mehmet Ruhi Onur ◽  
Necla Ozer ◽  
Yusuf Ziya Sener ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psoas Muscle ◽  
Cancer Staging ◽  
Anthracycline Cardiotoxicity ◽  
Skeletal Muscle Index ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American Society ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
European Society Of Cardiology

BackgroundSeveral studies have suggested that sarcopenia is associated with an increased treatment toxicity in patients with cancer. The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between sarcopenia and anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity.MethodsPatients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy between 2014 and 2018 and had baseline abdominal CT and baseline and follow-up echocardiography after anthracycline treatment were included. European Society of Cardiology ejection fraction criteria and American Society of Echocardiography diastolic dysfunction criteria were used for definition of cardiotoxicity. Sarcopenia was defined on the basis of skeletal muscle index (SMI) and psoas muscle index (PMI) calculated on CT images at L3 and L4 vertebra levels.ResultsA total of 166 patients (75 men and 91 women) were included. Sarcopenia was determined in 33 patients (19.9%) according to L3-SMI, in 17 patients (10.2%) according to L4-SMI and in 45 patients (27.1%) according to PMI. 27 patients (16.3%) developed cardiotoxicity. PMI and L3-SMI were significantly associated with an increased risk of cardiotoxicity (L3-SMI: HR=3.27, 95% CI 1.32 to 8.11, p=0.01; PMI: HR=3.71, 95% CI 1.58 to 8.73, p=0.003).ConclusionsThis is the first study demonstrating a significant association between CT-diagnosed sarcopenia and anthracycline-related cardiotoxicity. Routine CT scans performed for cancer staging may help clinicians identify high-risk patients in whom closer follow-up or cardioprotective measures should be considered.

scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: current approaches and opportunities for improvement

2011 ◽  
pp. 191-204
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
National Quality ◽  
American Society

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.

scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: current approaches and opportunities for improvement

2011 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 191
Author(s):  
Alpesh N. Amin ◽  
Steven B. Deitelzweig
Keyword(s):  
At Risk ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
National Quality ◽  
American Society

Venous thromboembolism (VTE), a common complication in patients with cancer, is associated with increased risk of morbidity, mortality, and recurrent VTE. Risk factors for VTE in cancer patients include the type and stage of cancer, comorbidities, age, major surgery, and active chemotherapy. Evidence-based guidelines for thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients have been published: the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society for Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for hospitalized cancer patients, while the American College of Chest Physician guidelines recommend thromboprophylaxis for surgical patients with cancer and bedridden cancer patients with an acute medical illness. Guidelines do not generally recommend routine thromboprophylaxis in ambulatory patients during chemotherapy, but there is evidence that some of these patients are at risk of VTE; some may be at higher risk while on active chemotherapy. Approaches are needed to identify those patients most likely to benefit from thromboprophylaxis, and, to this end, a risk assessment model has been developed and validated. Despite the benefits, many at-risk patients do not receive any thromboprophylaxis, or receive prophylaxis that is not compliant with guideline recommendations. Quality improvement initiatives have been developed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Quality Forum, and Joint Commission to encourage closure of the gap between guideline recommendations and clinical practice for prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of VTE in hospitalized patients. Health-care institutions and providers need to take seriously the burden of VTE, improve prophylaxis rates in patients with cancer, and address the need for prophylaxis across the patient continuum.

scholarly journals American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Epoetin and Darbepoetin in Adult Patients With Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (33) ◽  
pp. 4996-5010 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Douglas Rizzo ◽  
Melissa Brouwers ◽  
Patricia Hurley ◽  
Jerome Seidenfeld ◽  
Murat O. Arcasoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Information Storage And Retrieval ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Information Storage ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American Society ◽  
Meta Analyses

Purpose To update American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society of Hematology recommendations for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with cancer. Methods An Update Committee reviewed data published between January 2007 and January 2010. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Results The literature search yielded one new individual patient data analysis and four literature-based meta-analyses, two systematic reviews, and 13 publications reporting new results from randomized controlled trials not included in prior or new reviews. Recommendations For patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy who have a hemoglobin (Hb) level less than 10 g/dL, the Update Committee recommends that clinicians discuss potential harms (eg, thromboembolism, shorter survival) and benefits (eg, decreased transfusions) of ESAs and compare these with potential harms (eg, serious infections, immune-mediated adverse reactions) and benefits (eg, rapid Hb improvement) of RBC transfusions. Individual preferences for assumed risk should contribute to shared decisions on managing chemotherapy-induced anemia. The Committee cautions against ESA use under other circumstances. If used, ESAs should be administered at the lowest dose possible and should increase Hb to the lowest concentration possible to avoid transfusions. Available evidence does not identify Hb levels ≥ 10 g/dL either as thresholds for initiating treatment or as targets for ESA therapy. Starting doses and dose modifications after response or nonresponse should follow US Food and Drug Administration–approved labeling. ESAs should be discontinued after 6 to 8 weeks in nonresponders. ESAs should be avoided in patients with cancer not receiving concurrent chemotherapy, except for those with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Caution should be exercised when using ESAs with chemotherapeutic agents in diseases associated with increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Table 1 lists detailed recommendations. This guideline was developed through a collaboration between the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology and has been published jointly by invitation and consent in both Journal of Clinical Oncology and Blood. Copyright © 2010 American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology. All rights reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission by the American Society of Clinical Oncology or the American Society of Hematology.

scholarly journals Loneliness as a risk factor for frailty transition among older Chinese people

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
SHA SHA ◽  
Yuebin Xu ◽  
Lin Chen
Keyword(s):  
Strong Predictor ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Outcome Variable ◽  
Physical Frailty ◽  
Healthy Longevity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Older Chinese ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
High Level

Abstract Background: Previous literature has reported that loneliness is a strong predictor of frailty risk. However, less is known about the role of loneliness in frailty transition types. This study aimed to examine whether and how loneliness are related to frailty transition among older Chinese people.Methods: Our study used participants (aged ≥60 years) from 2008/2009, 2011/2012 and 2014 waves of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS). Loneliness was assessed by a single question asking how often the respondent feels lonely. The FRAIL Scale was created to measure physical frailty for our study, and frailty was also assessed by a broader definition of the frailty index. Frailty transition as an outcome variable has been designed as two types according to the measurement of frailty.Results: Greater loneliness at baseline reduced the possibility of remaining in a robust or prefrail physical frailty state after 3 years (OR=0.78, 95%CI: 0.68–0.91, p<0.01). Greater loneliness was associated with an increased risk of worsening physical frailty over time: compared with those who had never felt lonely, the odds ratios for people who often felt lonely were 1.19 (95%CI: 1.01–1.41, p<0.05) after 3 years and 1.34 (95%CI: 1.08–1.66, p<0.01) after 6 years. The association between loneliness and change in the frailty index differed in the survey periods: loneliness at baseline was found to increase the possibility of participants remaining in frailty (seldom loneliness: OR= 1.78, 95%CI: 1.25–2.55, p<0.01; often loneliness: OR= 1.74, 95%CI: 1.21–2.50, p<0.01) after 6 years, but no significance was shown in the 3-year follow up. Additionally, loneliness at baselines was significantly associated with frailty transition at follow up among the male participants. However, a similar association was not observed among the female participants.Conclusion: Older people with a high level of loneliness tend to be frail in the future, and greater loneliness is related to an increased risk of worsening frailty and remaining frail. Male elderly with a high level of loneliness were more likely to have a worse frailty transition than female elderly in China.

Health care costs among adolescent young adults with cancer at a community-based hospital.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18857-e18857
Author(s):  
Kekoa Taparra ◽  
Alec Fitzsimmons ◽  
Susan M. Frankki ◽  
Andrea DeWall ◽  
Fumiko Chino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cancer Diagnosis ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Community Hospital ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Increased Risk

e18857 Background: Adolescent Young Adults (AYAs) are likely to live for decades after a cancer diagnosis and thus have the potential to accumulate high healthcare costs. Prior research has shown high costs can be associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. However, there is limited understanding of how costs impact AYAs, especially in a community hospital. The purpose of this study is to 1) understand total community hospital healthcare costs for AYA patients with cancer, 2) identify risk factors for high costs, and 3) assess the impact of costs on survival. Methods: AYA patients (ages 15-29) treated at a community hospital were identified. Data collected included patient demographics, cancer characteristics, treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, immunotherapy, hormone therapy), support services (financial counseling, social work, survivorship), hospital admissions, miles from the hospital (great-circle distance), and all healthcare charges from one year prior to cancer diagnosis until last follow-up between 2000-2020. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify patients with costs greater than the median ($125K). Cox Proportional Hazard (CPH) regression models were used to identify factors associated with the risk of all-cause mortality. Results: A total of 388 AYA patients were identified with a median follow-up of 9 years and 97% survival. Most patients were age 30-39 years (62%), female (61%), white (95%), married (63%), non-smoker (59%), had insurance (78%), had early-stage cancer (85%), and were treated with surgery (83%). The most common cancers were melanoma (17%), breast cancer (14%), and thyroid cancer (14%). Median distance from treatment site was 23 miles. Median number of admissions was one. About a third of patients received chemotherapy (37%), radiation (28%), or hormone therapy (30%). Two-hundred thirty-three patients (60%) had complete healthcare cost data with a median total costs per patient of $123K (range, $73K-$215K). In adjusted analysis, patients with higher than median healthcare cost ( > $125K) had greater odds of hospital admission (odds ratio [OR] = 1.5, p < .001) and chemotherapy treatment (OR = 3.4, p = .005) as well as lower odds of living further from the hospital per one mile (OR = 0.3, p = .049) and being uninsured/unknown insurance (OR = 0.1, p = .047). In adjusted analysis, increased risk of death was associated with receiving radiation therapy (HR = 7.8, p = .02) and higher healthcare costs per $125K (HR = 3.8, p = .001). Conclusions: High costs of healthcare among AYA patients with cancer are related to chemotherapy, hospital admissions, and hospital proximity. High healthcare costs and radiation therapy may be associated with increased risk of death in the AYA population. This data may guide physician decision making for AYA patients ensuring mindfulness of high costs of care and how it relates to poor survival outcomes in community hospitals.

Psychosocioeconomic Precariousness, Cognitive Decline and Risk of Developing Dementia: A 25-Year Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 137-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Camille Ouvrard ◽  
Céline Meillon ◽  
Jean-François Dartigues ◽  
José Alberto Ávila-Funes ◽  
Hélène Amieva
Keyword(s):  
Socioeconomic Status ◽  
Cognitive Decline ◽  
Cognitive Reserve ◽  
Successful Ageing ◽  
Elderly Individuals ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Psychosocial Vulnerability ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
The Relationship

Background: This study investigates the relationship between psychosocioeconomic precariousness, cognitive decline and risk of developing dementia. Methods: The sample consisted of 3,710 subjects aged ≥65 years. Psychosocioeconomic precariousness was assessed with a ratio consisting of 8 self-reported items of poor socioeconomic status and psychosocial vulnerability. Results: Participants who were considered as precarious (n = 1,444) presented greater cognitive decline (β = -0.07; p = 0.0067) after adjusting for various confounders. They also had a 36% increased risk of developing dementia (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.17-1.57; p < 0.0001) over the 25-year follow-up period. Conclusion: Psychosocioeconomic precariousness is associated with greater cognitive decline and increased risk of developing dementia. This relationship can be explained in light of the concept of cognitive reserve and strengthens the need to consider psychosocioeconomic precariousness of elderly individuals in the definition of successful ageing policies.

scholarly journals Acromegaly and testicular seminoma: a rare association

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 122-123
Author(s):  
Abainou L ◽  
Eljadi H ◽  
Idrissi A ◽  
Meftah A ◽  
Essadi Ismail ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Neoplasms ◽  
Epidemiological Studies ◽  
Case Description ◽  
Testicular Seminoma ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Factor I ◽  
Rare Association ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Igf I

Context : Acromegaly is a chronic disease characterized by sustained elevation of circulating growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I).Epidemiological studies reported higher incidence of neoplasms in acromegalic patients especially colorectal and thyroid neoplasms. We report the case of a rare association of acromegaly to a testicular seminoma that deserves to be discussed. Case description: A 49-year-old male, who was treated for testicular seminoma, during the follow-up, acromegaly, was suspected because of typical acromegalic features, diagnosis was confirmed by elevated IGF-1 andpresence of pituitary adenoma showed by MRI. Conclusion: acromegalic patients are at an increased risk of developing neoplasms. Therefore, the clinician must have the reflex to think to look for features of acromegaly in patients with cancer as the case of our patient.

scholarly journals No Increased Risk of Secondary Neoplasms in Patients Treated with Rituximab for Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma : A Meta-Analysis of 9 Trials

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 1659-1659
Author(s):  
Isabelle Fleury ◽  
Sylvie Chevret ◽  
Michael Pfreundschuh ◽  
Gilles Salles ◽  
Bertrand Coiffier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Secondary Neoplasms ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American Society

Abstract Background. Rituximab improved outcomes of all CD20+ non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes. Rituximab induces a transient B-cell depletion and a dose-dependent T-cell inactivation (Stroopinsky et al., Cancer Immunol Immunother 2012) predisposing to T-cell dependent infections and to a potential impaired T-cell immunosurveillance. Secondary neoplasms (SN) is infrequent in trials including rituximab and the SN risk associated to rituximab across multiple trials has not been reported. We performed a systematic review of published trials comparing chemotherapy with or without rituximab to evaluate SN occurrence. Methods. Our primary endpoint was SN risk in patients with NHL treated with rituximab. We searched PubMed and Embase databases for randomised controlled trials on rituximab and lymphoma where rituximab constituted the only difference between treatment arms and where SN incidence or SN related death were reported. Authors were contacted for SN related rituximab exposure if not detailed. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and HIV-related lymphomas were excluded due to increased risk of SN. Updated follow-up of eligible trials presented at annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology were retrieved. Data were extracted independently by two authors. A random effects DerSimonian-Laird meta-analysis was performed to estimate the summary effect of rituximab on the hazard of SN. Statistical heterogeneity was tested using Woolf test. Results. We identified nine trials cumulating 4621 patients with 2312 exposed to rituximab and 2309 not exposed. These nine trials are known with the following names: PRIMA (1), GELA LNH98.5 (2), MINT (3), CORAL (4), IELSG-19 (5), EORTC20981 (6), OSHO#39 (7), SAKK 35/98 (8), RICOVER60 (9). Histology were diffuse large B cell (n=4), follicular (n=4) and marginal zone (n=1) lymphomas. Median age was 58.1 years. Sex distribution was available for seven trials with 1650 (47.6%) women and 1814 (52.4%) men. In all these trials but one (SAKK 35/98), rituximab was used associated with chemotherapy: CHOP, CHOEP, FCM, MCP, DHAP, ICE, or chlorambucil. At a median follow-up of 73 months [interquartile range: 72-84], a total of 334 SN was observed, including 169 SN in patients randomised to rituximab as compared to 165 SN in patients not randomised to rituximab (OR= 0.88; 95%CI: 0.66-1.19) (Figure 1). No evidence of significant heterogeneity was noticed across trials (p = 0.93). Notably, the proportion of females, histology subtypes, use of rituximab in first line, and use of rituximab over prolonged periods in maintenance did not influence SN risk (p = 0.94, p = 0.80, p = 0.87, p = 0.87 respectively). The SN risk was not increased in protocols administrating rituximab over periods of 8 months to 12 months (CORAL , OSHO#39) as opposed to periods of 24 months (PRIMA, EORTC20981) (p=0.86). Conclusions. This meta-analysis of nine trials randomising rituximab in NHL patients suggests no SN predisposition at a median follow-up of 6 years. SN risk associated with the combination of rituximab and new targeted therapies warrants prospective monitoring. Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Figure 1. Standard meta-analysis plot of the odds ratio of SN prevalence in the rituximab arm compared to the control arm Disclosures Fleury: Lundbeck: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Preceptorship Other. Pfreundschuh:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Spectrum: Research Funding. Salles:Roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. van Oers:Roche: Consultancy. Gisselbrecht:Roche: Research Funding. Zucca:Roche: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Herold:Roche Pharma AG/Germany: Honoraria, Research Funding. Ghielmini:Roche: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Is there value to routine oncologic surveillance after radical cystectomy? Comparative outcomes of symptomatic versus asymptomatic recurrence.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 421-421
Author(s):  
Abhinav Khanna ◽  
Andrew Zganjar ◽  
Paras Shah ◽  
Matthew K. Tollefson ◽  
Vidit Sharma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Cystectomy ◽  
Gastrointestinal Symptoms ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Presenting Symptoms ◽  
Voiding Symptoms ◽  
Routine Surveillance ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Risk Of Cancer

421 Background: Reported rates of adherence to post-radical cystectomy (RC) surveillance guidelines in real-world practice have been as low as 9%, in part reflecting a nihilistic view held by many of the value of routine follow-up. Indeed, conflicting data exist regarding the outcomes of patients with cancer recurrence detected by scheduled surveillance versus symptom-directed evaluation. Herein, we assessed comparative outcomes of patients with symptomatic recurrence (SR) versus asymptomatic recurrence (AR) after RC. Methods: We reviewed our Institutional Registry of RC patients to identify patients with cancer recurrence following RC. Presenting symptoms in the SR cohort included pain, constitutional symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and hematuria/voiding symptoms, whereas AR was defined as recurrence detected on routine surveillance in the absence of symptoms. Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between study groups using chi-square and t-test. Kaplan-Meier and Cox survival analyses were performed to compare cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) between AR and SR groups. Results: Of 3822 patients who underwent RC from 1980-2018 (with a median follow-up after RC of 2.4 years (IQR 1.1,5.5), a total of 1100 were subsequently diagnosed with recurrence, including 311 (28.3%) with AR and 789 (71.7%) with SR. Median time from RC to recurrence was longer in the AR group (13.2 months) than in the SR group (10.8 months; p = 0.01). Presenting symptoms included pain (70.2%), constitutional symptoms (50.7%), gastrointestinal symptoms (23.3%), and urinary symptoms (23.3%). Median follow-up after recurrence was 2.4 years (IQR 1.1-5.5), during which time 997 patients died, including 840 who died of bladder cancer. Compared to patients with SR, patients with AR had a longer median CSS (54.5 months vs 27.3 months, p < 0.001) and OS (43.0 months vs 25.8 months, p < 0.001). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for demographic and clinical factors, SR was associated with a significantly increased risk of cancer-specific (hazard ratio [HR] 1.66 [95% confidence interval 1.41-1.96], p < 0.0001) and all-cause mortality (HR 1.48 [1.23-1.71], p < 0.0001). Conclusions: SR after RC is associated with worse oncologic outcomes than post-RC recurrence detected by routine surveillance. As such, continued surveillance is warranted, while further study is needed to determine the optimal follow-up regimen balancing patient and disease risks.

American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update on the use of epoetin and darbepoetin in adult patients with cancer

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (20) ◽  
pp. 4045-4059 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Douglas Rizzo ◽  
Melissa Brouwers ◽  
Patricia Hurley ◽  
Jerome Seidenfeld ◽  
Murat O. Arcasoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Oncology ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Agents ◽  
Concurrent Chemotherapy ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
American Society ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Dose Modifications ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Abstract Purpose: To update American Society of Hematology/American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations for use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in patients with cancer. Methods: An Update Committee reviewed data published between January 2007 and January 2010. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library were searched. Results: The literature search yielded one new individual patient data analysis and four literature-based meta-analyses, two systematic reviews, and 13 publications reporting new results from randomized controlled trials not included in prior or new reviews. Recommendations: For patients undergoing myelosuppressive chemotherapy who have a hemoglobin (Hb) level less than 10 g/dL, the Update Committee recommends that clinicians discuss potential harms (eg, thromboembolism, shorter survival) and benefits (eg, decreased transfusions) of ESAs and compare these with potential harms (eg, serious infections, immune-mediated adverse reactions) and benefits (eg, rapid Hb improvement) of RBC transfusions. Individual preferences for assumed risk should contribute to shared decisions on managing chemotherapy-induced anemia. The Committee cautions against ESA use under other circumstances. If used, ESAs should be administered at the lowest dose possible and should increase Hb to the lowest concentration possible to avoid transfusions. Available evidence does not identify Hb levels ≥ 10 g/dL either as thresholds for initiating treatment or as targets for ESA therapy. Starting doses and dose modifications after response or nonresponse should follow US Food and Drug Administration–approved labeling. ESAs should be discontinued after 6 to 8 weeks in nonresponders. ESAs should be avoided in patients with cancer not receiving concurrent chemotherapy, except for those with lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Caution should be exercised when using ESAs with chemotherapeutic agents in diseases associated with increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Table 1 lists detailed recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document