Abnormal cervical cytology: a risk factor for endometrial cancer recurrence

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. K. Brown ◽  
S. Gillis ◽  
C. Deuel ◽  
C. Angel ◽  
C. Glantz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Nodal Status ◽  
Cervical Cytology ◽  
Abnormal Cervical Cytology ◽  
Risk Factors For Recurrence

The objective of this study was to evaluate the relationship between cervical cytology, histologic type, and risk of endometrial cancer recurrence. We performed a retrospective study of patients undergoing surgery for endometrial carcinoma. Risk factors for recurrence including histology, tumor grade, nodal status, myometrial invasion, peritoneal washings, stage, and cervical cytology were assessed. Abnormal cervical cytology was defined as the presence of any endometrial cells on Pap smear. Papillary serous and clear cell carcinomas were considered high-risk histologies. Univariate and multivariate analyses of risk factors for recurrence were performed. Thirty-nine (9%) patients developed recurrent endometrial cancer. More patients with abnormal Pap smears recurred (12% versus 4%, P < 0.05). For endometrioid adenocarcinoma, abnormal cervical cytology occurred in 61% and 7% recurred, while with high-risk histologies, 84% had abnormal cervical cytology and 19% recurred (P < 0.05). Other significant predictors of recurrence on univariate analysis were myometrial invasion, nodal status, washings, stage, and histology. On multivariate analysis, only nodal status remained a significant predictor of recurrence. Abnormal cervical cytology is associated with increased risk of endometrial cancer recurrence. Abnormal cervical cytology occurs more frequently in high-risk histologies, which are known to have a higher risk of recurrence. On multivariate analysis, only nodal spread remains a significant predictor of recurrence.

scholarly journals Controversies in the Adjuvant Therapy of Endometrial Cancer

2011 ◽  
Vol 2011 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheng-Mou Hsiao ◽  
Lin-Hung Wei
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Randomized Trials ◽  
Female Genital Tract ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
High Risk Factors ◽  
Grade 3

Endometrial cancer is the most common malignancy of the female genital tract. Surgical treatment includes hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and an appropriate staging procedure. Relapse of endometrial cancer may occur in patients with high risk factors, such as old age, grade 3 cancer, deep myometrial invasion, and papillary serous and clear cell types. In recent years, several randomized trials reported the results of adjuvant therapy for patients with high risk factors. Nonetheless, some controversies still exist. This paper presents and discusses the results of important randomized trials of adjuvant therapy for endometrial cancer with risk factors.

A randomized phase-III study on adjuvant treatment with radiation (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT) in early-stage high-risk endometrial cancer (NSGO-EC-9501/EORTC 55991)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5503-5503 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hogberg ◽  
P. Rosenberg ◽  
G. Kristensen ◽  
C. F. de Oliveira ◽  
R. de Pont Christensen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
Carboplatin Auc ◽  
Better Than

5503 Background: Adjuvant therapy for early stage high-risk endometrial cancer remains controversial. Methods: Patients with surgical stage I, II, IIIA (positive peritoneal fluid cytology only), or IIIC (positive pelvic lymph nodes only) were eligible if they, according to departmental guidelines, had a sufficiently high risk for micrometastatic disease to qualify for adjuvant therapy. Most patients had two or more of the risk factors: grade 3, deep myometrial invasion, or DNA non-diploidy, while some patients had only one of these. Patients with serous, clear cell, or anaplastic carcinomas were eligible regardless of risk factors. Patients with para-aortic metastases were not eligible. Lymph node exploration at staging surgery was optional. Pelvic RT ± vaginal brachytherapy was given to a dose =44 Gy. CT was given before or after RT. Before August 2004 CT consisted of four courses of cisplatin =50 mg/m2 + doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 or epirubicin 75 mg/m2 (AP). Thereafter several CT regimens were allowed, of which AP, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + epirubicin 60 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5, and paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 5–6 were used. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary end-point. The study was terminated before the aimed goal of 400 patients because of slow recruitment. We decided to make an early analysis since new studies on endometrial cancer are presently discussed. Results: 372 patients were entered between May 1996 and Oct 2006. Of 367 evaluable patients 190 were randomized to RT and 177 to RT+CT. Risk factors were well balanced between the randomization arms. The median follow-up time was 3.5 years. The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.58 in favor of RT+CT (95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.34 - 0.99; p=0.046). This translates to an estimated 7 % absolute difference in 5-year PFS from 75 % (95 % CI 67 % - 82 %) to 82 % (95 % CI 73 % - 88 %). Conclusion: RT+CT was better than RT alone. Next question is if RT+CT is better than CT alone. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Abnormal cervical cytology: a risk factor for endometrial cancer recurrence

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.K. Brown ◽  
S. Gillis ◽  
C. Deuel ◽  
C. Angel ◽  
C. Glantz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Risk Factor ◽  
Cancer Recurrence ◽  
Cervical Cytology ◽  
Abnormal Cervical Cytology

PET Parameters are Useful in Predicting Endometrial Cancer Risk Classes and Prognosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Budak ◽  
Emrah Beyan ◽  
Abdurrahman Hamdi Inan ◽  
Ahkam Göksel Kanmaz ◽  
Onur Suleyman Aldemir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Myometrial Invasion ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Total Sample ◽  
Tumor Stage ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Fdg Pet Ct

Abstract Aim We investigate the role of preoperative PET parameters to determine risk classes and prognosis of endometrial cancer (EC). Methods We enrolled 81 patients with EC who underwent preoperative F-18 FDG PET/CT. PET parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG), grade, histology and size of the primary tumor, stage of the disease, the degree of myometrial invasion (MI), and the presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), cervical invasion (CI), distant metastasis (DM) and lymph node metastasis (LNM) were recorded. The relationship between PET parameters, clinicopathological risk factors and overall survival (OS) was evaluated. Results The present study included 81 patients with EC (mean age 60). Of the total sample, 21 patients were considered low risk (endometrioid histology, stage 1A, grade 1 or 2, tumor diameter < 4 cm, and LVI negative) and 60 were deemed high risk. All of the PET parameters were higher in the presence of a high-risk state, greater tumor size, deep MI, LVI and stage 1B-4B. MTV and TLG values were higher in the patients with non-endometrioid histology, CI, grade 3 and LNM. The optimum cut-off levels for differentiating between the high and low risk patients were: 11.1 for SUVmax (AUC = 0.757), 6 for SUVmean (AUC = 0.750), 6.6 for MTV(AUC = 0.838) and 56.2 for TLG(AUC = 0.835). MTV and TLG values were found as independent prognostic factors for OS, whereas SUVmax and SUVmean values were not predictive. Conclusions The PET parameters are useful in noninvasively differentiating between risk groups of EC. Furthermore, volumetric PET parameters can be predictive for OS of EC.

Prognostic Factors for Developing Thrombosis in Polycytemia Vera: A Retrospective Analysis of 331 Patients with Long-Term Follow-up Highlights the Importance of White Blood Cells Levels

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 48-49
Author(s):  
Samantha Ferrari ◽  
Chiara Pagani ◽  
Mariella D'Adda ◽  
Nicola Bianchetti ◽  
Annamaria Pelizzari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Board Of Directors ◽  
Advisory Board ◽  
Advisory Committees ◽  
Risk Status ◽  
History Of ◽  
Wbc Count

Polycythemia Vera (PV) is a chronic myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by erythrocytosis, constitutively active mutations in JAK2 and an increased susceptibility to thrombotic events (TEs). There is still controversy about the role of increased hematocrit and of other variables including elevated white blood cell count as risk factors for the occurrence of TEs. A better definition of the relative prognostic importance of hematologic parameters would help us to better tailor the therapeutic approach to PV patients (pts), which is currently mainly based on the use of acetilsalycilic acid (ASA), venesection and hydroxyurea . The aim of our study was to analyze if any clinical or laboratory variables were significantly associated to the occurrence of TEs both at PV diagnosis and during the course of the disease in a large series of PV pts uniformly followed at a single Center over a period of 29.5 years from January 1986 to June 2019. Clinical and laboratory data were obtained from the time of diagnosis until death, progression to acute leukemia or last follow-up. Hematocrit (Hct), hemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell (WBC) and platelet (PLT) levels were recorded for each patient at least every 6 months. Among a total of 331 pts, the median age was 65 years (range 30-92 years), and 56% were male. "High risk" features (age ≥ 60 years and/or history of prior thrombosis) were present in 221 pts (66.7%). The incidence of cardiovascular risk factors was: hypertension 64%, diabetes 15%, hyperlipidemia 28%, history of active or remote smoking 41%. Patients on ASA were 279 (84%), 19 (6%) were on oral anticoagulation, while 27 (8%) were on ASA+oral anticoagulant. At PV diagnosis 54 pts (16%) presented with thrombosis, arterial in 32 (59%) and venous in 22 (41%). A previous TE was recorded in 57 pts (17%): in 43 (75%) arterial, in 12 (22%) venous and in 2 (3%) mixed (arterial+venous). Previous thrombosis was the only variable significantly associated with the presence of a TE at PV diagnosis (P=0.02). After PV diagnosis, with a median follow-up of 81 months (range 1-374 months), 63 pts (19%) experienced a TE and 11 of them a further episode, for a total of 74 TEs. The incidence rate (pts/year) of TEs was 2.7%. Forty-two events were arterial (57%), 31 were venous (42%) and 1 (1%) was mixed. It was the first TE for 37 pts. Cerebrovascular accidents and deep-venous thrombosis were the most frequent arterial and venous TEs both at PV diagnosis and throughout the disease course, with a relative incidence of 50% and 32% respectively. The table compares the characteristics of patients who did or did not develop a TE after PV diagnosis. At univariate analysis, PV high risk status, a previous TE and hyperlipidemia at PV diagnosis were significantly associated with a subsequent TE. Among hematologic variables an elevated WBC count at the time of thrombosis, but not Hct or PLT levels, was highly significantly associated with the development of a TE. At multivariate analysis, WBC count ≥10.4 x 10^9/L and hyperlipidemia maintained their independent prognostic value, while high risk status and a previous TE lost their prognostic significance. Both at univariate and multivariate analysis, hyperlipidemia at diagnosis (P=0.009 and P=0.002) and high WBC count at thrombosis (P=0.001 and P=&lt;0.0001) predicted for arterial thromboses, while only a history of prior thrombosis (P=0.03) predicted for venous ones. In conclusion, our analysis confirms that elevated WBC count at the moment of the event more than increased hematocrit is associated to the development of thrombosis in PV pts. We also found that hyperlipidemia was an independent risk factor for arterial thrombosis, calling for an accurate management of increased lipid levels. Whether a reduction of the WBC count during the course of PV may reduce the frequency of TE remains to be demonstrated by prospective studies. Table Disclosures D'Adda: Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Incyte: Other: Advisory board; Pfizer: Other: Advisory board. Rossi:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Astellas: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Other: Advisory board; Alexion: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Jazz: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

scholarly journals Development and Analysis of a Weighed Prognostic Model in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 47-48
Author(s):  
Xue-Han Mao ◽  
Yan Xu ◽  
Yuting Yan ◽  
Jiahui Liu ◽  
Huishou Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Prognostic Model ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Total Score Range ◽  
Prognosis Model

Background and Objective: Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized with significant cytogenetic changes and complex tumor microenvironment, thus patient survival is extremely heterogeneous. Various disease-related or patient-related factors affect the prognosis of patients. This study tried to analyze the prognostic indicators of patients with newly-treated MM, especially explored the prognosis of multiple cytogenetic abnormalities and the ratio of lymphocytes to monocytes (LMR). Additionally, we established a comprehensive prognostic model to help determine the patient prognosis. Methods: After screening, 603 patients of untreated MM from January 2008 to June 2017, with complete baseline indicators were enrolled into the study. By univariate and multivariate Cox analysis, risk factors related to the prognosis of patients were evaluated, and a weighted prognosis model was established to compare the survival differences of patients in each risk stratification. Result: Optimal thresholds of ALC, LWR, NLR and LMR were determined by ROC curve and Youdex index: ALC = 1.415, LWR = 0.325, NLR = 1.935, LMR = 2.95. Survival analysis showed that patients with LMR ≤ 2.95, ALC ≥ 1.415 and LWR ≥ 0.325 had significantly better survival compared with their respective control groups. Cox multivariate analysis showed that among the four indicators, only LMR≤2.95 was an independent adverse prognostic factor for overall survival (OS)(Figure 1A). 17p deletion, 1q21 amplification, t (4; 14) / t (14; 16) were define as high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRA). Of the 603 patients, about 60% were associated with at least one high-risk cytogenetic event. Among them, the occurrence of cumulative 0, 1, 2, and 3 HRA were 39.6% (239/603), 42.5% (256/603), 16.6% (100/603), and 1.3% (8/603), respectively. There was no significant difference in survival among patients with same number of HRAs. The median OS of patients with 0, 1 and ≥ 2 HRA were not reached, 62.1 months (95% CI, 49.3-74.9) and 30.4 months (95% CI, 24.5-36.3), respectively (p &lt;0.001)(Figure 1B).Final Cox regression model showed that age 65 ~ 74 (HR=1.77, 95%CI, 1.24-2.51, p=0.001), age ≥75 (HR=2.46, 95%CI, 1.69-3.58, p &lt; 0.001), LDH≥247 U/L (HR =1.65, 95%CI, 1.07-2.51, p=0.023), ISS stage III (HR=1.76, 95%CI, 1.24-2.50, p=0.002), LMR≤2.95 (HR=1.53, 95%CI, 1.08-2.18, p=0.017), 1 HRA (HR=1.87, 95%CI, 1.27-2.75, p=0.002) and ≥2 HRA (HR=3.48, 95%CI, 2.22-5.45, p&lt;0.001) are independent adverse prognostic factors for OS. Then weighted risk factors were summed to establish a comprehensive prognosis model, with a total score range of 0-6 points. Accordingly, the whole cohort was divided into low risk (0-1 points, 45.4%), intermediate risk (2 points, 27.9%), high risk (3 points, 19.2%) and ultra-high risk (4-6 points, 7.5 %) groups. The median OS of the four risk groups were 85.8 months (67.1-104.5), 49.0 months (44.7-53.3), 35.4 months (31.3-39.5), and 23.2 months (18.8-27.6), respectively (p&lt;0.001). The C-statistics of this prognostic model is 0.68 (95% CI, 0.64-0.71), which is significantly better than the D-S stage (C-statistics = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.50-0.55, p &lt;0.001), ISS (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.64, p &lt;0.001) and R-ISS stage (C-statistics = 0.60, 95% CI, 0.57-0.63, p &lt;0.001). Bootstrap resampling and calibration curve showed that the model has an accurate predictive effect on both short-term and long-term prognosis of patients(Figure 1C). Conclusion: In our analysis, ALC, LWR, LMR were associated with poor prognosis in NDMM patients, while NLR had no significant prognostic significance. Among the four indicators, LMR≤2.95 was the only independent prognostic factor. In NDMM patients, survival of patients with the same number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were comparable with each other, regardless of whichever combination of HRA. Higher number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities were associated with worse prognosis. Cox multivariate analysis showed that, old age (65-74 years old, ≥75 years old), increased LDH (≥247 U/L), decreased LMR (≤2.95), ISS III, 1 HRA and ≥ 2 HRA were independent adverse prognostic factors that affect the OS of MM patients. 4. A comprehensive weighted prognostic model was established with the above factors, which was proved to effectively distinguish different prognosis of patients. Figure 1 Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Characteristics of high-risk human papillomavirus infection in women with abnormal cervical cytology: a population-based study in Shanxi Province, China

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Song ◽  
Yuanjing Lyu ◽  
Ling Ding ◽  
Xiaoxue Li ◽  
Wen Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Human Papillomavirus ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Hpv Infection ◽  
Cervical Cytology ◽  
Shanxi Province ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion ◽  
Abnormal Cervical Cytology ◽  
Intraepithelial Lesion

Abstract Background: High-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection is widely known as the major cause of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical cancer and it’s characteristics vary greatly in different population. Women with abnormal cervical cytology could increase the risk of cervical cancer, however, HR-HPV infection characteristics in women with abnormal cervical cytology remains unclear. Methods: This study was based on baseline survey of the CIN Cohort established in Shanxi Province, China. A total number of 2300 women with cervical abnormalities were enrolled in this study. All participants gave informed consent and agreed to HPV and thinprepcytologic test (TCT). Each individual completed a questionnaire about characteristics related to HPV infection. Results: The overall prevalence of HR-HPV in 2300 women was 32.0%, and the proportion of single and multiple HR-HPV infections were 70.2% and 29.8% in HR-HPV infection women, respectively. The top five HR-HPV genotypes were ranked as HPV16, HPV58, HPV52, HPV53 and HPV51. The prevalence of HR-HPV in atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion and above(HSIL+) were 30.8%, 36.5% and 54.9%, respectively, showing an increasing trend with the severity of cervical cytology ( χ 2 trend =13.952; p <0.001). The women aged 35~45 years, with lower education level, less frequency of bathing, multiple gravidity, multiple parity, history of gynecological diseases and premenopausal women were prone to HR-HPV infection. Conclusions: We defined the characteristics related to HR-HPV infection in abnormal cervical cytology women, and provided an insight for the development and deeply research of HPV vaccine.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document