scholarly journals 036 The impact of a clinical support tool on stroke key performance indicators

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (e7) ◽  
pp. A12.3-A13
Author(s):  
Khaled Alanati ◽  
James Evans
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Google Scholar ◽  
Cochrane Database ◽  
The Impact

IntroductionAdherence to key performance indicators (KPIs) in stroke care is associated with better outcomes.1–6 The complexity in management of acute strokes, however, has created barriers towards delivering best care with plateauing of KPIs as measured by The National Stroke Foundation Clinical Audit.We examined the impact on stroke KPIs in our local health district of a web-based decision support stroke platform which provides clinicians with up-to-date information about the patient’s management flagging potential areas for improvement, allowing treatment to be optimised in real time.MethodsSix months following the introduction of the platform we performed a retrospective analysis of Electronic medical records of patients admitted to Gosford hospital with acute stroke between June 2018 and September 2018 assessing access to the stroke unit as well as being discharged on appropriate secondary prophylactics, including antihypertensives and correct antithrombotic therapy. Patients whose direction of care was palliative and patients with documented contraindication to secondary prophylactics were excluded.ResultsOver four months, 136 patients presented with acute ischaemic stroke and 11 patients had a haemorrhagic stroke. 49 ischaemic stroke patients had atrial fibrillation. Stroke unit access was higher following its introduction in 2018 compared to 2017 (97% vs 76%, respectively). Similar findings were noted for patients with atrial fibrillation who received oral anticoagulants on discharge (90% vs 50%) and patients discharged on antihypertensives (95% vs 80%).ConclusionUse of a clinical support platform in managing acute stroke is an intervention that improves stroke care.ReferencesUrimubenshi G, Langhorne P, Cadilhac DA, Kagwiza JN, Wu O. Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. European Stroke Journal 2017;2(4):287–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396987317735426Sandercock P, Gubitz G, Foley P. Antiplatelet therapy for acute ischaemic stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;2: CD000029. Google ScholarKwan J, Sandercock P. In-hospital care pathways for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2004;4: CD002924. Google ScholarSaxena R, Koudstaal PJ. Anticoagulants for preventing stroke in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation and a history of stroke or transient ischemic attack. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;4: CD000187. Google ScholarGoyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trial. Lancet 2016;387:1723–1731. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISIMiddleton S, McElduff P, Ward J. Implementation of evidence-based treatment protocols to manage fever, hyperglycaemia, and swallowing dysfunction in acute stroke (QASC): a cluster randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011;378:1699–1706. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

scholarly journals Association between patient outcomes and key performance indicators of stroke care quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard Urimubenshi ◽  
Peter Langhorne ◽  
Dominique A Cadilhac ◽  
Jeanne N Kagwiza ◽  
Olivia Wu
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Nutritional Assessment ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Lipid Management

Purpose Translating research evidence into clinical practice often uses key performance indicators to monitor quality of care. We conducted a systematic review to identify the stroke key performance indicators used in large registries, and to estimate their association with patient outcomes. Method We sought publications of recent (January 2000–May 2017) national or regional stroke registers reporting the association of key performance indicators with patient outcome (adjusting for age and stroke severity). We searched Ovid Medline, EMBASE and PubMed and screened references from bibliographies. We used an inverse variance random effects meta-analysis to estimate associations (odds ratio; 95% confidence interval) with death or poor outcome (death or disability) at the end of follow-up. Findings We identified 30 eligible studies (324,409 patients). The commonest key performance indicators were swallowing/nutritional assessment, stroke unit admission, antiplatelet use for ischaemic stroke, brain imaging and anticoagulant use for ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation, lipid management, deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis and early physiotherapy/mobilisation. Lower case fatality was associated with stroke unit admission (odds ratio 0.79; 0.72–0.87), swallow/nutritional assessment (odds ratio 0.78; 0.66–0.92) and antiplatelet use for ischaemic stroke (odds ratio 0.61; 0.50–0.74) or anticoagulant use for ischaemic stroke with atrial fibrillation (odds ratio 0.51; 0.43–0.64), lipid management (odds ratio 0.52; 0.38–0.71) and early physiotherapy or mobilisation (odds ratio 0.78; 0.67–0.91). Reduced poor outcome was associated with adherence to swallowing/nutritional assessment (odds ratio 0.58; 0.43–0.78) and stroke unit admission (odds ratio 0.83; 0.77–0.89). Adherence with several key performance indicators appeared to have an additive benefit. Discussion Adherence with common key performance indicators was consistently associated with a lower risk of death or disability after stroke. Conclusion Policy makers and health care professionals should implement and monitor those key performance indicators supported by good evidence.

scholarly journals Bottlenecks in the Acute Stroke Care System during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Catalonia

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Anna Ramos-Pachón ◽  
Álvaro García-Tornel ◽  
Mònica Millán ◽  
Marc Ribó ◽  
Sergi Amaro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Prehospital Delays ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in significant healthcare reorganizations, potentially striking standard medical care. We investigated the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on acute stroke care quality and clinical outcomes to detect healthcare system’s bottlenecks from a territorial point of view. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Crossed-data analysis between a prospective nation-based mandatory registry of acute stroke, Emergency Medical System (EMS) records, and daily incidence of COVID-19 in Catalonia (Spain). We included all stroke code activations during the pandemic (March 15–May 2, 2020) and an immediate prepandemic period (January 26–March 14, 2020). Primary outcomes were stroke code activations and reperfusion therapies in both periods. Secondary outcomes included clinical characteristics, workflow metrics, differences across types of stroke centers, correlation analysis between weekly EMS alerts, COVID-19 cases, and workflow metrics, and impact on mortality and clinical outcome at 90 days. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Stroke code activations decreased by 22% and reperfusion therapies dropped by 29% during the pandemic period, with no differences in age, stroke severity, or large vessel occlusion. Calls to EMS were handled 42 min later, and time from onset to hospital arrival increased by 53 min, with significant correlations between weekly COVID-19 cases and more EMS calls (rho = 0.81), less stroke code activations (rho = −0.37), and longer prehospital delays (rho = 0.25). Telestroke centers were afflicted with higher reductions in stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, referrals to endovascular centers, and increased delays to thrombolytics. The independent odds of death increased (OR 1.6 [1.05–2.4], <i>p</i> 0.03) and good functional outcome decreased (mRS ≤2 at 90 days: OR 0.6 [0.4–0.9], <i>p</i> 0.015) during the pandemic period. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> During the COVID-19 pandemic, Catalonia’s stroke system’s weakest points were the delay to EMS alert and a decline of stroke code activations, reperfusion treatments, and interhospital transfers, mostly at local centers. Patients suffering an acute stroke during the pandemic period had higher odds of poor functional outcome and death. The complete stroke care system’s analysis is crucial to allocate resources appropriately.

scholarly journals Benefits and safety of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate in acute stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials (protocol)

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e043591
Author(s):  
Beng Leong Lim ◽  
Wei Feng Lee ◽  
Wei Ming Ng ◽  
Wei Ling Tay ◽  
Wui Ling Chan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Glyceryl Trinitrate ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Review ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Placebo Control ◽  
Randomised Trials ◽  
Patient Subgroup

IntroductionHigh blood pressure (BP) in acute stroke has adverse outcomes. Transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) has beneficial properties in controlling BP. The 2016 meta-analysis and 2017 Cochrane review showed that transdermal GTN was beneficial in a small patient subgroup with stroke onset ≤6 hours. Larger studies focusing on this patient subgroup have since been conducted. We report the protocol for an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on the safety and benefits of transdermal GTN in acute stroke.Methods and analysisWe will search Medline, Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Library from inception until June 2020 for randomised trials that report the efficacy and safety of transdermal GTN versus placebo/control therapy among adult patients with acute stroke. Primary outcomes include in-hospital mortality, BP lowering and late functional status. Secondary outcomes include early, late, resource utilisation and surrogate outcomes. Safety outcomes include reported adverse events. Reviewers will first screen titles and abstracts, and then full texts, to identify eligible studies. Independently and in duplicate, they will extract data, assess risk of bias (RoB) using a modified Cochrane RoB tool and quality of evidence using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation. Disagreement will be resolved by discussion and consultation with an external reviewer if necessary. Using a random-effects model, we will report effect sizes using relative risks and 95% CIs. We will perform predefined subgroup analyses: intracerebral haemorrhage versus ischaemic stroke; minor (NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) ≤five) versus major (NIHSS >five) ischaemic stroke; ischaemic stroke with versus without thrombolysis; prehospital versus non-prehospital settings; time from stroke to randomisation ≤6 versus >6 hours and high versus low overall RoB studies. We will also perform trial sequential analysis for the primary outcomes.Ethics and disseminationEthics board approval is unnecessary. PROSPERO registration has been obtained. The results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020173093.

Abstract 223: Impact of Differences in Once- vs Twice-Daily Medications Adherence on the Risk of Bleed and Stroke in Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of Randomized Trials and Claims Data Sources

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen A McHorney ◽  
Eric D Peterson ◽  
Mike Durkin ◽  
Veronica Ashton ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Oral Anticoagulants ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Cardiovascular Medications ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Similar Risk

Background: In non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, those receiving once-daily (QD) versus twice-daily (BID) non vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may have better medication adherence. The impact on stroke and bleed risk is not known. Objective: To estimate the impact of adherence differences between QD vs BID therapies on bleed and stroke risks in NVAF patients. Methods: The relation between adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC]) for QD vs BID NOACs and one year bleed risk was modeled using claims data from Truven Health Analytics MarketScan databases (7/2012-10/2015). Next, the relation between adherence and bleeding was calibrated to match that seen in the placebo and NOAC arms of previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Finally, we used adherence rates for QD (PDC=0.849) and BID (PDC=0.738) cardiovascular medications from a meta-analysis (Coleman et al.). These rates were used in the calibrated model to estimate bleeds. An analogous method was applied to evaluate the impact of QD vs BID adherence on stroke risk. Results: The relation between PDC and risks of bleed and stroke was modeled using claims data (N=65,022) and calibrated using RCTs. In the calibrated model, compared with BID dosing, QD dosing was associated with 81 fewer strokes (34% reduction) and 14 more bleeds (6% more) per 10,000 patients/year (Figure). Conclusion: Among NVAF patients, better adherence to QD dosing was associated with a significantly lower stroke risk of QD but similar risk of bleed.

Abstract P141: Global Impact of Covid-19 Pandemic on Acute Stroke and Mechanical Thrombectomy - An International Survey

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dileep R Yavagal ◽  
Vasu Saini ◽  
Violiza Inoa ◽  
Hannah E Gardener ◽  
Sheila O Martins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Acute Stroke Care ◽  
Treatment Practices ◽  
Global Impact ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The World ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic has strained the healthcare systems across the world but its impact on acute stroke care is just being elucidated. We hypothesized a major global impact of COVID-19 not only on stroke volumes but also on thrombectomy practice. Methods: A 19-item questionnaire survey aimed to identify the changes in stroke volumes and treatment practices seen during COVID-19 pandemic was designed using Qualtrics software. It was sent to stroke and neuro-interventional physicians around the world who are part of the executive committee of a global coalition, Mission Thrombectomy 2020 (MT2020) between April 5 th to May 15 th , 2020. Results: There were 113 responses across 25 countries. Globally there was a median 33% decrease in stroke admissions and a 25% decrease in mechanical thrombectomy (MT) procedures during COVID-19 pandemic compared to immediately preceding months (Figure 1A-B). This overall median decrease was despite a median increase in stroke volume in 4 European countries which diverted all stroke patients to only a few selected centers during the pandemic. The intubation policy during the pandemic for patients undergoing MT was highly variable across participating centers: 44% preferred intubating all patients, including 25% centers that changed their policy to preferred-intubation (PI) vs 27% centers that switched to preferred-conscious-sedation (PCS). There was no significant difference in rate of COVID-19 infection between PI vs PCS (p=0.6) or if intubation policy was changed in either direction (p=1). Low-volume (<10 stroke/month) compared with high-volume stroke centers (>20 strokes/month) are less likely to have neurointerventional suite specific written personal protective equipment protocols (74% vs 88%) and if present, these centers are more likely to report them to be inadequate (58% vs 92%). Conclusion: Our data provides a comprehensive snapshot of the impact on acute stroke care observed worldwide during the pandemic.

Abstract W MP60: Atrial Fibrillation is Associated with Worse Collaterals in Acute Stroke: Angiography in the ENDOSTROKE Registry

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S Liebeskind ◽  
Christian H Nolte ◽  
Georg Bohner ◽  
Tobias Neumann-Haefelin ◽  
Erich Hofmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Endovascular Therapy ◽  
Cardioembolic Stroke ◽  
Baseline Risk ◽  
Anterior Circulation ◽  
Stroke Treatment ◽  
Stroke Etiology ◽  
The Impact

Background: Risk factors for stroke may alter hemodynamics or invoke ischemic preconditioning, yet the impact of such factors on response to acute stroke treatment and the potential relationship with collateral circulation remains unknown. Methods: Consecutive cases enrolled in the International Multicenter Registry for Mechanical Recanalization Procedures in Acute Stroke (ENDOSTROKE) were analyzed with respect to collateral status on baseline angiography before endovascular therapy. ASITN/SIR collateral grade (0-1/2/3-4) was scored by the core lab, blind to all other data. Collateral grade was analyzed with respect to numerous baseline risk factors, demographics and outcomes after endovascular intervention. Results: 109 patients (median age 69 years (25 th , 75 th percentiles: 56, 77); 51% women; median baseline NIHSS 15 (13, 18)) with complete (TICI 0) anterior circulation occlusions (M1, n=71; ICA, n=28; M2, n=10) at baseline were evaluated based on collateral grade (0-1, n=12; 2, n=41; 3-4, n=56). Worse collaterals were noted in patients with atrial fibrillation (ASITN grades 0-1/2/3-4: 21%/30%/49%) as compared to patients without atrial fibrillation (5%/42%/53%, p=0.024), yet cardioembolic stroke etiology was unrelated. Other baseline features such as age, gender, time to presentation, other co-morbidities and labs were unrelated to collateral grade. Post-procedure reperfusion (TICI 2b-3) was significantly associated with better collaterals (OR 2.58 (1.343-4.957, p=0.004). Similarly, final infarct size was significantly smaller in those with better collaterals. Good clinical outcomes (mRS 0-2 at day 90) were less frequent in those with poorer collaterals (OR 0.403 (0.199-0.813, p=0.011). Conclusions: Atrial fibrillation, but not cardioembolic stroke etiology, is associated with worse collaterals. Hemodynamic implications, such as diminished cardiac output due to atrial fibrillation, may result in less favorable outcomes after endovascular therapy for acute stroke.

scholarly journals A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Molecular Biomarkers Associated with Early Neurological Deterioration Following Acute Stroke

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 230-241 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander J. Martin ◽  
Christopher I. Price
Keyword(s):  
Ischaemic Stroke ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Neurological Status ◽  
Neurological Deterioration ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Early Neurological Deterioration

Background: Early neurological deterioration (END) following acute stroke is associated with poorer long-term outcomes. Identification of patients at risk could assist early monitoring and treatment decisions. This review summarised the evidence describing non-radiological biomarkers for END. Summary: Electronic searches from January 1990 to March 2017 identified studies reporting a blood/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)/urine biomarker measurement within 24 h of acute stroke and at least 2 serial assessments of clinical neurological status (< 24 h and < 7 days). Out of 12,895 citations, 82 studies were included, mostly focusing on ischaemic stroke. Using higher neurological thresholds, the n-weighted END incidence for ischaemic stroke was 11.9% (95% CI 11.4–12.4%) and 18.6% (17.9–19.2%) for lower thresholds. Incidence decreased with advancing study publication year (Pearson r-squared 0.23 and 0.15 for higher and lower threshold studies). After classification into 3 broad categories, meta-analysis showed that biomarkers associated with increased END risk (n; fixed-effects mean difference; 95% CI) were “metabolic” (glucose [n = 9,481; 0.90 mmol/L; 0.74–1.06], glycosylated haemoglobin [n = 3,146; 0.33%; 0.19–0.46], low-density lipoprotein [n = 4,839; 0.13 mmol/L; 0.06–0.21], total cholesterol [n = 4,762; 0.21 mmol/L; 0.11–0.31], triglycerides [n = 4,820; 0.11 mmol/L; 0.06–0.17], urea [n = 1,351; 0.55 mmol/L; 0.14–0.96], decreasing albumin [n = 513; 0.33 g/dL; 0.05–0.61]); “inflammatory and excitotoxic” (plasma glutamate [n = 688; 60.13 µmol/L; 50.04–70.22], CSF glutamate [n = 369; 7.50 µmol/L; 6.76–8.23], homocysteine [n = 824; 2.15 µmol/L; 0.68–3.61], leucocytes [n = 3,766; 0.54 × 109/L; 0.34–0.74], high-sensitivity C-reactive protein [n = 1,707; 3.79 mg/L; 1.23–6.35]); and “coagulation/haematological” (fibrinogen [n = 3,132; 0.32 g/L; 0.25–0.40]; decreasing haemoglobin [n = 3,586; 2.38 g/L; 0.15–4.60]). Key Messages: Declining incidence of END may represent improving care standards; however, it remains a frequent occurrence. Although statistical associations exist between biomarkers and an increased risk of END, the most promising still need prospective evaluation to determine their additional value relative to baseline radiological and clinical characteristics.

scholarly journals Evaluation of the impact of promotional campaign through a social networks on the key performance indicators of website for online of group-buying in Brazil

2016 ◽  
pp. 244
Author(s):  
I. А. Rodello ◽  
V. Dândolo ◽  
M. M. Grande
Keyword(s):  
Social Networks ◽  
Correlation Coefficient ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Web Site ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Key Performance Indicators ◽  
Main Task ◽  
Group Buying ◽  
Promotional Campaign ◽  
The Impact

Relevance of the study: Based on data collection and analysis, present research made it possible to identify how the activities devised by a group-buying website on Facebook may exert influence on the KPIs for success.Purpose: The main task of present research is to answer the following question: can a digital social network be considered an effective tool for the improvement of key performance indicators (KPI) of a group-buying website?Findings: The research was conducted by considering data collected via mechanical observation using the computational tools Facebook Dashboard and Google Analytics. Data were analyzed using the means of comparison and a Pearson correlation coefficient, which demonstrated positive results of the campaign. When compared, the key performance indicators of the web site relating to Facebook displayed a larger dynamics than the general performance indicators of this web site. By the correlation coefficient, it was found that a higher power range of the Facebook Enterprise´s fan page could result in the increased traffic page hits of the examined web site, and an increase, mainly, in the number of new visitors.Originality / value: This paper analyzes some key performance indicators of a promotional campaign on Facebook for an online group-buying website in the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo State, Brazil.Practical implications: Based on the collected data and performed analysis, it was found that the promotional activities on Facebook can increase the flow of new visitors and attract potential buyers to a group-buying website.Future research: It is recommended to perform further research for other social networks and in other countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document