Cardiometabolic risk, biological sex, and age do not share an interactive relationship with cognitive function: A cross-sectional analysis of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging
It is unclear whether cardiometabolic risk shares an interactive relationship with age-associated differences in cognition, and whether this relationship varies by biological sex. We conducted a cross-sectional analyses using baseline data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (2010-2015) to examine whether: 1) cardiometabolic risk has an interactive relationship with age-associated cognition; and 2) interactive effects are sex-dependent. We measured memory, executive function, and verbal fluency in the Comprehensive cohort (n=25,830; 45-86 years). Each cognitive domain was modeled using restricted cubic splines for age and each cardiometabolic risk factor (HbA1c, HSCRP, TG, and LDL and HDL cholesterol). Sex was included as a predictor in all models. Wald chi-square statistics were used to determine the relative importance of age, cardiometabolic risk, sex, and their interactive effects on cognition. Age was the most important variable in each model (proportion χ2=34-48%). Biological sex was the second most important variable for memory (proportion χ2=26%), but was unimportant for executive function and verbal fluency (proportion χ2=3-5%). Cardiometabolic risk factors were unimportant predictors in each model (proportion χ2=1-3%). Two and three-way interactions between cardiometabolic risk, age, and sex were also unimportant (proportion χ2=0-2%). Thus, cardiometabolic risk factors did not meaningfully account for age-associated differences in cognition, and these associations (or lack thereof) did not vary by sex. Novelty: Males have poorer age-associated cognitive performance than females Females and males differ in cardiometabolic risk across middle and older adulthood Cardiometabolic risk has a small association with age-associated cognition, and there are no sex differences in this relationship