scholarly journals ExAtlas: An interactive online tool for meta-analysis of gene expression data

2015 ◽  
Vol 13 (06) ◽  
pp. 1550019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexei A. Sharov ◽  
David Schlessinger ◽  
Minoru S. H. Ko
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Ontology ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Public Data

We have developed ExAtlas, an on-line software tool for meta-analysis and visualization of gene expression data. In contrast to existing software tools, ExAtlas compares multi-component data sets and generates results for all combinations (e.g. all gene expression profiles versus all Gene Ontology annotations). ExAtlas handles both users’ own data and data extracted semi-automatically from the public repository (GEO/NCBI database). ExAtlas provides a variety of tools for meta-analyses: (1) standard meta-analysis (fixed effects, random effects, z-score, and Fisher’s methods); (2) analyses of global correlations between gene expression data sets; (3) gene set enrichment; (4) gene set overlap; (5) gene association by expression profile; (6) gene specificity; and (7) statistical analysis (ANOVA, pairwise comparison, and PCA). ExAtlas produces graphical outputs, including heatmaps, scatter-plots, bar-charts, and three-dimensional images. Some of the most widely used public data sets (e.g. GNF/BioGPS, Gene Ontology, KEGG, GAD phenotypes, BrainScan, ENCODE ChIP-seq, and protein–protein interaction) are pre-loaded and can be used for functional annotations.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of crowdsourced data compendia suggests pan-disease transcriptional signatures of autoimmunity

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 2884 ◽  
Author(s):  
William W. Lau ◽  
Rachel Sparks ◽  
John S. Tsang ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Type I Diabetes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Type I ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Public Data ◽  
All Diseases

Background: The proliferation of publicly accessible large-scale biological data together with increasing availability of bioinformatics tools have the potential to transform biomedical research. Here we report a crowdsourcing Jamboree that explored whether a team of volunteer biologists without formal bioinformatics training could use OMiCC, a crowdsourcing web platform that facilitates the reuse and (meta-) analysis of public gene expression data, to compile and annotate gene expression data, and design comparisons between disease and control sample groups. Methods: The Jamboree focused on several common human autoimmune diseases, including systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), multiple sclerosis (MS), type I diabetes (DM1), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and the corresponding mouse models. Meta-analyses were performed in OMiCC using comparisons constructed by the participants to identify 1) gene expression signatures for each disease (disease versus healthy controls at the gene expression and biological pathway levels), 2) conserved signatures across all diseases within each species (pan-disease signatures), and 3) conserved signatures between species for each disease and across all diseases (cross-species signatures). Results: A large number of differentially expressed genes were identified for each disease based on meta-analysis, with observed overlap among diseases both within and across species. Gene set/pathway enrichment of upregulated genes suggested conserved signatures (e.g., interferon) across all human and mouse conditions. Conclusions: Our Jamboree exercise provides evidence that when enabled by appropriate tools, a "crowd" of biologists can work together to accelerate the pace by which the increasingly large amounts of public data can be reused and meta-analyzed for generating and testing hypotheses. Our encouraging experience suggests that a similar crowdsourcing approach can be used to explore other biological questions.

Gene Set Correlation Analysis and Visualization Using Gene Expression Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chen-An Tsai ◽  
James J. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Correlation Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Differentially Expressed Gene ◽  
Differentially Expressed ◽  
Superior Performance ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Set ◽  
Gene Sets ◽  
Set Correlation

Background: Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) provide a useful and powerful approach to identify differentially expressed gene sets with prior biological knowledge. Several GSEA algorithms have been proposed to perform enrichment analyses on groups of genes. However, many of these algorithms have focused on identification of differentially expressed gene sets in a given phenotype. Objective: In this paper, we propose a gene set analytic framework, Gene Set Correlation Analysis (GSCoA), that simultaneously measures within and between gene sets variation to identify sets of genes enriched for differential expression and highly co-related pathways. Methods: We apply co-inertia analysis to the comparisons of cross-gene sets in gene expression data to measure the costructure of expression profiles in pairs of gene sets. Co-inertia analysis (CIA) is one multivariate method to identify trends or co-relationships in multiple datasets, which contain the same samples. The objective of CIA is to seek ordinations (dimension reduction diagrams) of two gene sets such that the square covariance between the projections of the gene sets on successive axes is maximized. Simulation studies illustrate that CIA offers superior performance in identifying corelationships between gene sets in all simulation settings when compared to correlation-based gene set methods. Result and Conclusion: We also combine between-gene set CIA and GSEA to discover the relationships between gene sets significantly associated with phenotypes. In addition, we provide a graphical technique for visualizing and simultaneously exploring the associations of between and within gene sets and their interaction and network. We then demonstrate integration of within and between gene sets variation using CIA and GSEA, applied to the p53 gene expression data using the c2 curated gene sets. Ultimately, the GSCoA approach provides an attractive tool for identification and visualization of novel associations between pairs of gene sets by integrating co-relationships between gene sets into gene set analysis.

scholarly journals Predicting Host Immune Cell Dynamics and Key Disease-Associated Genes Using Tissue Transcriptional Profiles

Processes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (5) ◽  
pp. 301
Author(s):  
Muying Wang ◽  
Satoshi Fukuyama ◽  
Yoshihiro Kawaoka ◽  
Jason E. Shoemaker
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Mean Squared Error ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
Critical Factor ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Cell Dynamics ◽  
Cell Counts

Motivation: Immune cell dynamics is a critical factor of disease-associated pathology (immunopathology) that also impacts the levels of mRNAs in diseased tissue. Deconvolution algorithms attempt to infer cell quantities in a tissue/organ sample based on gene expression profiles and are often evaluated using artificial, non-complex samples. Their accuracy on estimating cell counts given temporal tissue gene expression data remains not well characterized and has never been characterized when using diseased lung. Further, how to remove the effects of cell migration on transcript counts to improve discovery of disease factors is an open question. Results: Four cell count inference (i.e., deconvolution) tools are evaluated using microarray data from influenza-infected lung sampled at several time points post-infection. The analysis finds that inferred cell quantities are accurate only for select cell types and there is a tendency for algorithms to have a good relative fit (R 2 ) but a poor absolute fit (normalized mean squared error; NMSE), which suggests systemic biases exist. Nonetheless, using cell fraction estimates to adjust gene expression data, we show that genes associated with influenza virus replication and increased infection pathology are more likely to be identified as significant than when applying traditional statistical tests.

scholarly journals Connecting gene expression data from connectivity map and in silico target predictions for small molecule mechanism-of-action analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aakash Chavan Ravindranath ◽  
Nolen Perualila-Tan ◽  
Adetayo Kasim ◽  
Georgios Drakakis ◽  
Sonia Liggi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Ligand Binding ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
In Silico ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Connectivity Map ◽  
Action Analysis

Integrating gene expression profiles with certain proteins can improve our understanding of the fundamental mechanisms in protein–ligand binding.

scholarly journals Gene Ontology Analysis of 3D Microarray Gene Expression Data using Hybrid PSO Optimization

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 3890-3896
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Ontology ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Biological Significance ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Microarray Gene Expression Data ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Data Mining Technique ◽  
Microarray Gene Expression ◽  
3D Gene

At present, triclustering is the well known data mining technique for analysis of 3D gene expression data (GST). Triclustering is a simultaneously clustering of subset of Gene (G), subset of Sample (S), and over a subset of Time point (T). Triclustering approach identifies a coherent pattern in the 3D gene expression data using Mean Correlation Value (MCV). In this chapter, Hybrid PSO based algorithm is developed for triclustering of 3D gene expression data. This algorithm can effectively find the coherent pattern with high volume of a tricluster. The experimental study is conducted on yeast cycle dataset to study the biological significance of the coherent tricluster using gene ontology tool

Building Gene Networks by Analyzing Gene Expression Profiles

2019 ◽  
pp. 27-44
Author(s):  
Crescenzio Gallo
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Dna Microarrays ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Expression Profiles ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Gene Expressions ◽  
Over Time

The possible applications of modeling and simulation in the field of bioinformatics are very extensive, ranging from understanding basic metabolic paths to exploring genetic variability. Experimental results carried out with DNA microarrays allow researchers to measure expression levels for thousands of genes simultaneously, across different conditions and over time. A key step in the analysis of gene expression data is the detection of groups of genes that manifest similar expression patterns. In this chapter, the authors examine various methods for analyzing gene expression data, addressing the important topics of (1) selecting the most differentially expressed genes, (2) grouping them by means of their relationships, and (3) classifying samples based on gene expressions.

Analyzing Large Gene Expression Data Sets

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soumya Raychaudhuri
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Expression Data ◽  
Expression Analysis ◽  
Gene Expression Analysis ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Expression Data ◽  
Clustering Methods ◽  
Biologically Relevant ◽  
Large Gene ◽  
Functional Coherence

The most interesting and challenging gene expression data sets to analyze are large multidimensional data sets that contain expression values for many genes across multiple conditions. In these data sets the use of scientific text can be particularly useful, since there are a myriad of genes examined under vastly different conditions, each of which may induce or repress expression of the same gene for different reasons. There is an enormous complexity to the data that we are examining—each gene is associated with dozens if not hundreds of expression values as well as multiple documents built up from vocabularies consisting of thousands of words. In Section 2.4 we reviewed common gene expression strategies, most of which revolve around defining groups of genes based on common profiles. A limitation of many gene expression analytic approaches is that they do not incorporate comprehensive background knowledge about the genes into the analysis. We present computational methods that leverage the peer-reviewed literature in the automatic analysis of gene expression data sets. Including the literature in gene expression data analysis offers an opportunity to incorporate background functional information about the genes when defining expression clusters. In Chapter 5 we saw how literature- based approaches could help in the analysis of single condition experiments. Here we will apply the strategies introduced in Chapter 6 to assess the coherence of groups of genes to enhance gene expression analysis approaches. The methods proposed here could, in fact, be applied to any multivariate genomics data type. The key concepts discussed in this chapter are listed in the frame box. We begin with a discussion of gene groups and their role in expression analysis; we briefly discuss strategies to assign keywords to groups and strategies to assess their functional coherence. We apply functional coherence measures to gene expression analysis; for examples we focus on a yeast expression data set. We first demonstrate how functional coherence can be used to focus in on the key biologically relevant gene groups derived by clustering methods such as self-organizing maps and k-means clustering.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document