Functional and molecular identification of intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channels in breast cancer cells: association with cell cycle progression

2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (1) ◽  
pp. C125-C134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halima Ouadid-Ahidouch ◽  
Morad Roudbaraki ◽  
Philippe Delcourt ◽  
Ahmed Ahidouch ◽  
Nathalie Joury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Membrane Potential ◽  
Current Density ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mcf 7 ◽  
In Cells

We have previously reported that the hEAG K+ channels are responsible for the potential membrane hyperpolarization that induces human breast cancer cell progression into the G1 phase of the cell cycle. In the present study, we evaluate the role and functional expression of the intermediate-conductance Ca2+-activated K+ channel, hIK1-like, in controlling cell cycle progression. Our results demonstrate that hIK1 current density increased in cells synchronized at the end of the G1 or S phase compared with those in the early G1 phase. This increased current density paralleled the enhancement in hIK1 mRNA levels and the highly negative membrane potential. Furthermore, in cells synchronized at the end of G1 or S phases, basal cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) was also higher than in cells arrested in early G1. Blocking hIK1 channels with a specific blocker, clotrimazole, induced both membrane potential depolarization and a decrease in the [Ca2+]i in cells arrested at the end of G1 and S phases but not in cells arrested early in the G1 phase. Blocking hIK1 with clotrimazole also induced cell proliferation inhibition but to a lesser degree than blocking hEAG with astemizole. The two drugs were essentially additive, inhibiting MCF-7 cell proliferation by 82% and arresting >90% of cells in the G1 phase. Thus, although the progression of MCF-7 cells through the early G1 phase is dependent on the activation of hEAG K+ channels, when it comes to G1 and checkpoint G1/S transition, the membrane potential appears to be primarily dependent on the hIK1-activity level.

scholarly journals Roquin1 Suppresses Breast Cancer Growth by Inducing Cell Cycle Arrest via Selectively Destabilizing Cell Cycle–Promoting Gene mRNAs

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenbao Lu ◽  
Meicen Zhou ◽  
Bing Wang ◽  
Xueting Liu ◽  
Bingwei Li
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Cycle Arrest ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Tumor ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cycle Arrest

Abstract Background: Dysregulation of cell cycle progression is one of the common features of human cancer cells, however, its mechanism remains unclear. This study aims to clarify the role and the underlying mechanisms of Roquin1 in cell cycle arrest induction in breast cancer.Methods: Public cancer databases were analyzed to identify the expression pattern of Roquin1 in human breast cancers and the significant association with patient survival. Quantitative real-time PCR and western blots were performed to detect the expression of Roquin1 in breast cancer samples and cell lines. Cell counting, MTT assay, flow cytometry, and in vivo study were conducted to investigate the effects of Roquin1 on cell proliferation, cell cycle progression and tumor progression. RNA-sequencing was applied to identify the differential genes and pathways regulated by Roquin1. RNA immunoprecipitation assay, luciferase reporter assay, mRNA half-life detection, RNA affinity binding assay, and RIP-ChIP were used to explore the molecular mechanisms of Roquin1.Results: We showed that Roquin1 expression in breast cancer tissues and cell lines was inhibited, and the reduction in Roquin1 expression was associated with poor overall survival and relapse free survival of patients with breast cancer. Roquin1 overexpression inhibited breast cancer cell proliferation and induced G1/S cell cycle arrest without causing significant apoptosis. In contrast, knockdown of Roquin1 promoted breast cancer cell growth and cycle progression. Moreover, in vivo induction of Roquin1 by adenovirus significantly suppressed breast tumor growth and metastasis. Mechanistically, Roquin1 selectively destabilizing cell cycle–promoting genes, including Cyclin D1, Cyclin E1, cyclin dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) and minichromosome maintenance 2 (MCM2) through targeting the stem–loop structure in the 3’untranslated region (3’UTR) of mRNAs via its ROQ domain, leading to the downregulation of cell cycle–promoting mRNAs.Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated that Roquin1 was a novel breast tumor suppressor and could induce G1/S cell cycle arrest by selectively downregulating the expression of cell cycle–promoting genes, which might as a potential molecular target for breast cancer treatment.

scholarly journals Growth factor, steroid, and steroid antagonist regulation of cyclin gene expression associated with changes in T-47D human breast cancer cell cycle progression.

1993 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 3577-3587 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Musgrove ◽  
J A Hamilton ◽  
C S Lee ◽  
K J Sweeney ◽  
C K Watts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cyclin D1 ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Breast Cancer Cell ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
G1 Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression

Cyclins and proto-oncogenes including c-myc have been implicated in eukaryotic cell cycle control. The role of cyclins in steroidal regulation of cell proliferation is unknown, but a role for c-myc has been suggested. This study investigated the relationship between regulation of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression, particularly by steroids and their antagonists, and changes in the levels of expression of these genes. Sequential induction of cyclins D1 (early G1 phase), D3, E, A (late G1-early S phase), and B1 (G2 phase) was observed following insulin stimulation of cell cycle progression in serum-free medium. Transient acceleration of G1-phase cells by progestin was also accompanied by rapid induction of cyclin D1, apparent within 2 h. This early induction of cyclin D1 and the ability of delayed administration of antiprogestin to antagonize progestin-induced increases in both cyclin D1 mRNA and the proportion of cells in S phase support a central role for cyclin D1 in mediating the mitogenic response in T-47D cells. Compatible with this hypothesis, antiestrogen treatment reduced the expression of cyclin D1 approximately 8 h before changes in cell cycle phase distribution accompanying growth inhibition. In the absence of progestin, antiprogestin treatment inhibited T-47D cell cycle progression but in contrast did not decrease cyclin D1 expression. Thus, changes in cyclin D1 gene expression are often, but not invariably, associated with changes in the rate of T-47D breast cancer cell cycle progression. However, both antiestrogen and antiprogestin depleted c-myc mRNA by > 80% within 2 h. These data suggest the involvement of both cyclin D1 and c-myc in the steroidal control of breast cancer cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals Regulation of cell cycle and cyclins by 16alpha-hydroxyestrone in MCF-7 breast cancer cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-307 ◽  
Author(s):  
JS Lewis ◽  
TJ Thomas ◽  
CM Klinge ◽  
MA Gallo ◽  
T Thomas
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Breast Cancer Cells ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Synchronized Cells ◽  
Mcf 7

It has been suggested that alterations in estradiol (E(2)) metabolism, resulting in increased production of 16alpha-hydroxyestrone (16alpha-OHE(1)), is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. In the present study, we examined the effects of 16alpha-OHE(1)on DNA synthesis, cell cycle progression, and the expression of cell cycle regulatory genes in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. G(1) synchronized cells were treated with 1 to 25 nM 16alpha-OHE(1) for 24 and 48 h. [(3)H]Thymidine incorporation assay showed that 16alpha-OHE(1) caused an 8-fold increase in DNA synthesis compared with that of control cells, whereas E(2) caused a 4-fold increase. Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle progression also demonstrated the potency of 16alpha-OHE(1) in stimulating cell growth. When G(1) synchronized cells were treated with 10 nM 16alpha-OHE(1) for 24 h, 62+/-3% of cells were in S phase compared with 14+/-3% and 52+/-2% of cells in the control and E(2)-treated groups respectively. In order to explore the role of 16alpha-OHE(1) in cell cycle regulation, we examined its effects on cyclins (D1, E, A, B1), cyclin dependent kinases (Cdk4, Cdk2), and retinoblastoma protein (pRB) using Western and Northern blot analysis. Treatment of cells with 10 nM 16alpha-OHE(1) resulted in 4- and 3-fold increases in cyclin D1 and cyclin A, respectively, at the protein level. There was also a significant increase in pRB phosphorylation and Cdk2 activation. In addition, transient transfection assay using an estrogen response element-driven luciferase reporter vector showed a 15-fold increase in estrogen receptor-mediated transactivation compared with control. These results show that 16alpha-OHE(1) is a potent estrogen capable of accelerating cell cycle kinetics and stimulating the expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins.

scholarly journals Combined low-dose zearalenone and aflatoxin B1 on cell growth and cell-cycle progression in breast cancer MCF-7 cells

2017 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 139-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ka Yiu Yip ◽  
Murphy Lam Yim Wan ◽  
Alice Sze Tsai Wong ◽  
Kenneth S. Korach ◽  
Hani El-Nezami
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Growth ◽  
Aflatoxin B1 ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Mcf 7

scholarly journals Mechanosensitive Expression of Lamellipodin Governs Cell Cycle Progression and Intracellular Stiffness

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph A. Brazzo ◽  
Kwonmoo Lee ◽  
Yongho Bae
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Cell Migration ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
M Phase ◽  
And Migration ◽  
In Cells

SUMMARYCells exhibit pathological behaviors in response to increased extracellular matrix (ECM) stiffness, including accelerated cell proliferation and migration [1–9], which are correlated with increased intracellular stiffness and tension [2, 3, 10–12]. The biomechanical signal transduction of ECM stiffness into relevant molecular signals and resultant cellular processes is mediated through multiple proteins associated with the actin cytoskeleton in lamellipodia [2, 3, 10, 11, 13]. However, the molecular mechanisms by which lamellipodial dynamics regulate cellular responses to ECM stiffening remain unclear. Previous work described that lamellipodin, a phosphoinositide- and actin filament-binding protein that is known mostly for controlling cell migration [14–21], promotes ECM stiffness-mediated early cell cycle progression [2], revealing a potential commonality between the mechanisms controlling stiffness-dependent cell migration and those controlling cell proliferation. However, i) whether and how ECM stiffness affects the levels of lamellipodin expression and ii) whether stiffness-mediated lamellipodin expression is required throughout cell cycle progression and for intracellular stiffness have not been explored. Here, we show that the levels of lamellipodin expression in cells are significantly increased by a stiff ECM and that this stiffness-mediated lamellipodin upregulation persistently stimulates cell cycle progression and intracellular stiffness throughout the cell cycle, from the early G1 phase to M phase. Finally, we show that both Rac activation and intracellular stiffening are required for the mechanosensitive induction of lamellipodin. More specifically, inhibiting Rac1 activation in cells on stiff ECM reduces the levels of lamellipodin expression, and this effect is reversed by the overexpression of activated Rac1 in cells on soft ECM. We thus propose that lamellipodin is a critical molecular lynchpin in the control of mechanosensitive cell cycle progression and intracellular stiffness.

scholarly journals E2F1 Induces KIF26A Transcription and Promotes Cell Cycle Progression via CDK–RB–E2Fs Feedback Loop in Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Xu ◽  
Lei Liu ◽  
Ranran Ma ◽  
Yawen Wang ◽  
Xu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Feedback Loop ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Transcriptional Factor ◽  
Phase Cell ◽  
Luciferase Reporter ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
The Core

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to investigate the role of KIF26A in breast cancer.MethodqRT-PCR and immunohistochemistry were conducted to explore KIF26A expression and functional contribution to breast cancer development. MTS, EDU, colony formation assays, and flow cytometry analysis were conducted to assess cell proliferation characteristics and cell cycle progression. A series of 5′-flanking region deletion plasmids and mutating the binding site, with the luciferase reporter assay, were used to identify the core promotor region of KIF26A. The prediction by software and construction of the transcriptional factor plasmids were used to identify the transcriptional factor. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay could demonstrate transcriptional factor directly binding to the KIF26A promoter. Human Genome Oligo Microarray Assay and gene ontology (GO) and pathway analyses were used to predict the downstream pathway.ResultsOur results showed that in breast cancer tissues, elevated KIF26A expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis. KIF26A could promote proliferation and G0/G1 phase cell cycle progression in breast cancer cells. The core promoter region of the human KIF26A gene was located upstream of the transcription start site at position −395 to −385. The transcriptional factor E2F1 was shown to activate KIF26A expression. Furthermore, KIF26A was shown to inhibit the expression of p21, then activate CDK–RB–E2Fs pathway. The elevated E2F1 can activate the cell cycle progression and the KIF26A expression, forming feedback loop.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that KIF26A, directly upregulated by E2F1, promoted cell proliferation and cell cycle progression via CDK–RB–E2Fs feedback loop in breast cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document