Age diminishes the testicular steroidogenic response to repeated intravenous pulses of recombinant human LH during acute GnRH-receptor blockade in healthy men

2005 ◽  
Vol 288 (4) ◽  
pp. E775-E781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johannes D. Veldhuis ◽  
Nathan J. D. Veldhuis ◽  
Daniel M. Keenan ◽  
Ali Iranmanesh
Keyword(s):  
Leydig Cell ◽  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Men 2 ◽  
Aging Men ◽  
Pharmacological Stimulation ◽  
Significant Impairment ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Pulsatile Infusion

Testosterone (Te) concentrations fall gradually in healthy aging men. Postulated mechanisms include relative failure of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and/or gonadal Te secretion. Available methods to test Leydig cell Te production include pharmacological stimulation with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). We reasoned that physiological lutropic signaling could be mimicked by pulsatile infusion of recombinant human (rh) LH during acute suppression of LH secretion. To this end, we studied eight young (ages 19–30 yr) and seven older (ages 61–73 yr) men in an experimental paradigm comprising 1) inhibition of overnight LH secretion with a potent selective GnRH-receptor antagonist (ganirelix, 2 mg sc), 2) intravenous infusion of consecutive pulses of rh LH (50 IU every 2 h), and 3) chemiluminometric assay of LH and Te concentrations sampled every 10 min for 26 h. Statistical analyses revealed that 1) ganirelix suppressed LH and Te equally (> 75% median inhibition) in young and older men, 2) infused LH pulse profiles did not differ by age, and 3) successive intravenous pulses of rh LH increased concentrations of free Te (ng/dl) to 4.6 ± 0.38 (young) and 2.1 ± 0.14 (older; P < 0.001) and bioavailable Te (ng/dl) to 337 ± 20 (young) and 209 ± 16 (older; P = 0.002). Thus controlled pulsatile rh LH drive that emulates physiological LH pulses unmasks significant impairment of short-term Leydig cell steroidogenesis in aging men. Whether more prolonged pulsatile LH stimulation would normalize this inferred defect is unknown.

scholarly journals Impact of Age on Cortisol Secretory Dynamics Basally and as Driven by Nutrient-Withdrawal Stress*

2000 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. 2203-2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bergendahl ◽  
A. Iranmanesh ◽  
T. Mulligan ◽  
J. D. Veldhuis
Keyword(s):  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Metabolic Stress ◽  
Serum Cortisol ◽  
Cortisol Secretion ◽  
Older Individuals ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Fed State ◽  
Aging Men ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Cortisol Release

The present study tests the clinical hypothesis that aging impairs homeostatic adaptations of cortisol secretion to stress. To this end, we implemented a short-term 3.5-day fast as an ethically acceptable metabolic stressor in eight young (ages 18–35 yr) and eight older (ages 60–72 yr) healthy men. Volunteers were studied in randomly ordered fed vs. fasting sessions. To capture the more complex dynamics of cortisol’s feedback control, blood was sampled every 10 min for 24 h for later RIA of serum cortisol concentrations and quantitation of the pulsatile, entropic, and 24-h rhythmic modes of cortisol release using deconvolution analysis, the approximate entropy statistic, and cosine regression, respectively. The stress of fasting elevated the mean (24-h) serum cortisol concentration equivalently in the two age cohorts [i.e. from 7.2± 0.35 to 11.6 ± 0.71 μg/dL in young men and from 7.7 ± 0.39 to 12.6 ± 0.59 μg/dL in older individuals (P &lt; 10−7)]. The rise in integrated cortisol output was driven mechanistically by selective augmentation of cortisol secretory burst mass (P = 0.002). The resultant daily (pulsatile) cortisol secretion rate increased significantly but equally in young (from 94 ± 6.3 to 151 ± 15 μg/dL·day) and older (from 85 ± 5.4 to 145 ± 7.3μ g/dL·day) volunteers (P &lt; 10−4). Nutrient restriction also prompted a marked reduction in the quantifiable regularity of (univariate) cortisol release patterns in both cohorts (P &lt; 10−4). However, older men showed loss of joint synchrony of cortisol and LH secretion even in the fed state, which failed to change with metabolic stress (P &lt; 10−6). In addition, older individuals maintained a premature (early-day) cortisol elevation in the fed state and unexpectedly evolved an anomalous further cortisol phase advance of 99 ± 16 min during fasting (P &lt; 10−5). Caloric deprivation in aging men also disproportionately elevated the mesor of 24-h rhythmic cortisol release (P = 10−7) and elicited a greater increment in the mean day-night variation in cortisol secretory-burst mass (P &lt; 0.01 vs. young controls). Lastly, short-term caloric depletion in older subjects paradoxically normalized their age-associated suppression of the 24-h rhythm in cortisol interburst intervals. In summary, acute metabolic stress in healthy aging men (compared with young individuals) unmasks distinct, albeit complex, disruption of cortisol homeostasis. These dynamic anomalies impact the feedback-dependent and time-sensitive coupling of pulsatile and 24-h rhythmic cortisol secretion. Nutrient-withdrawal stress in the older male heightens the cortisol phase disparity already evident in fed elderly individuals. Conversely, the stress of fasting in young men paradoxically reproduces selected features of the aging unstressed (fed) cortisol axis; viz., abrogation of joint cortisol-LH synchrony and suppression of the normal diurnal variation in cortisol burst frequency. Whether fasting would unveil analogous disruption of feedback-dependent control of the corticotropic axis in healthy aging women is not yet known.

Effects of Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone Administration in Healthy Aging Men

1995 ◽  
pp. 257-265
Author(s):  
M. R. Blackman ◽  
J. Vittone ◽  
E. Corpas ◽  
J. Busby-Whitehead ◽  
T. Stevens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Hormone ◽  
Healthy Aging ◽  
Growth Hormone Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Hormone Administration ◽  
Aging Men

Modulatory effect of steroid hormones on GnRH-induced LH secretion by cultured rat pituitary cells

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 963-969 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriela T. Pérez ◽  
Marta E. Apfelbaum
Keyword(s):  
Steroid Hormones ◽  
Pituitary Cells ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Stimulatory Action ◽  
Rat Pituitary ◽  
Lh Release ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Rat Pituitary Cells ◽  
Lh Secretion

The purpose of the present experiments was to examine the short- and long-term effects of estradiol-17β (E2), progesterone (P), and 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), alone and in combination, on the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, using an ovariectomized rat pituitary cells culture model. After 72 h in steroid-free medium, pituitary cells were further cultured for 24 h in medium with or without E2 (1 nM), P (100 nM), or DHT (10 nM). Cultures were then incubated for 5 h in the absence or presence of 1 nM GnRH with or without steroids. LH was measured in the medium and cell extract by radioimmunoassay. The results show that the steroid hormones exert opposite effects on the release of LH induced by GnRH, which seems to be dependent upon the length of time the pituitary cells have been exposed to the steroids. In fact, short-term (5 h) action of E2 resulted in a partial inhibition (64% of control) of LH release in response to GnRH, while long-term (24 h) exposure enhanced (158%) GnRH-induced LH release. Similar results were obtained with DHT, although the magnitude of the effect was lower than with E2. Conversely, P caused an acute stimulatory action (118%) on the LH released in response to GnRH and a slightly inhibitory effect (90%) after chronic treatment. GnRH-stimulated LH biosynthesis was also influenced by steroid treatment. Significant increases in total (cells plus medium) LH were observed in pituitary cells treated with E2 or DHT. While the stimulatory effect of E2 was evident after both acute (133%) and chronic (119%) treatment, that of DHT appears to be exerted mainly after long-term priming (118%). These results suggest that the steroids modulate GnRH-induced LH secretion by acting on both synthesis and release of LH. On the other hand, total hormone content was not affected by P. The acute (5 h) effects of E2, P, and DHT on the GnRH response in E2-primed (24 h) cells during a short-term incubation, were also tested. Addition of P to the pituitary cells primed with E2 led to an acute potentiation of the stimulatory effect of E2 on GnRH-induced LH release and total content. Conversely, the augmentative E2 effect on pituitary responsiveness to GnRH was abolished by DHT. Taken together, these findings suggest that the physiological significance of the stimulatory action of progesterone could be to define the final magnitude of the LH preovulatory surge, while the inhibition by DHT could be required to limit the LH surge to that day of proestrus.Key words: luteinizing hormone, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone, steroid hormones, cultured pituitary cells.

Relationship between gonadotrophin subunit gene expression, gonadotrophin-releasing hormone receptor content and pituitary and plasma gonadotrophin concentrations during the rebound release of FSH after treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid during the luteal phase of the cycle

1992 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Brooks ◽  
W. J. Crow ◽  
J. R. McNeilly ◽  
A. S. McNeilly
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Fluid ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Α Subunit ◽  
Luteal Regression ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Cessation Of Treatment

ABSTRACT The modulation of FSH secretion at the beginning and middle of the follicular phase of the cycle represents the key event in the growth and selection of the preovulatory follicle. However, the mechanisms that operate within the pituitary gland to control the increased release of FSH and its subsequent inhibition in vivo remain unclear. Treatment of ewes with bovine follicular fluid (bFF) during the luteal phase has been previously shown to suppress the plasma concentrations of FSH and, following cessation of treatment on day 11, a rebound release of FSH occurs on days 12 and 13. When luteal regression is induced on day 12, this hypersecretion of FSH results in an increase in follicle growth and ovulation rate. To investigate the mechanisms involved in the control of FSH secretion, ewes were treated with twice daily s.c. injections of 5 ml bFF on days 3–11 of the oestrous cycle and luteal regression was induced on day 12 with prostaglandin (PG). The treated ewes and their controls were then killed on day 11 (luteal), or 16 or 32h after PG and their pituitaries removed and halved. One half was analysed for gonadotrophin and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor content. Total pituitary RNA was extracted from the other half and subjected to Northern analysis using probes for FSH-β, LH-β and common α subunit. Frequent blood samples were taken and assayed for gonadotrophins. FSH secretion was significantly (P<0.01) reduced during bFF treatment throughout the luteal phase and then significantly (P<0.01) increased after cessation of treatment, with maximum secretion being reached 18– 22h after PG, and then declining towards control values by 32h after PG. A similar pattern of LH secretion was seen after bFF treatment. Pituitary FSH content was significantly (P<0.05) reduced by bFF treatment at all stages of the cycle. No difference in the pituitary LH content was seen. The increase in GnRH receptor content after PG in the controls was delayed in the treated animals. Analysis of pituitary mRNA levels revealed that bFF treatment significantly (P<0.01) reduced FSH-β mRNA levels in the luteal phase. Increased levels of FSH-β, LH-β and α subunit mRNA were seen 16h after PG in the bFF-treated animals, at the time when FSH and LH secretion from the pituitary was near maximum. These results suggest that the rebound release of FSH after treatment with bFF (as a source of inhibin) is related to a rapid increase in FSH-β mRNA, supporting the concept that the rate of FSH release is directly related to the rate of synthesis.

Influence of melatonin and oestradiol on the opioidergic regulation of LH and prolactin release in pony mares

1997 ◽  
Vol 154 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Aurich ◽  
J Lange ◽  
H-O Hoppen ◽  
J E Aurich
Keyword(s):  
Prolactin Secretion ◽  
Opioid Antagonist ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Melatonin Treatment ◽  
Prolactin Release ◽  
Oestradiol Treatment ◽  
Oestradiol Benzoate ◽  
Lh Release ◽  
Lh Secretion

Abstract The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of oestradiol, melatonin and season on the opioid regulation of LH and prolactin release. Effects of the opioid antagonist naloxone (0·5 mg/kg) on LH and prolactin secretion were determined in ovariectomized pony mares. In experiment 1, mares in January (n=6) were pretreated with oestradiol benzoate (5 μg/kg) for 20 days. In experiment 2, beginning in May, mares (n=7) received melatonin (15 mg) for 15 days and subsequently a combination of melatonin plus oestradiol for 20 days. In experiment 3, beginning in May, mares (n=6) were pretreated with oestradiol for 30 days, left untreated for 12 days and then given melatonin for 35 days. In all experiments the animals were injected with the opioid antagonist naloxone and saline on 2 consecutive days prior to treatment. In experiment 1, animals received naloxone and saline on days 10 and 11 and 20 and 21 following oestradiol treatment. In experiment 2, naloxone and saline were administered on days 15 and 16 following melatonin treatment and on days 10 and 11 and 20 and 21 of melatonin plus oestradiol treatment. In experiment 3, the animals received naloxone and saline on days 10 and 11, 20 and 21 and 30 and 31 of oestradiol treatment, prior to melatonin treatment and on days 15 and 16, 25 and 26 and 35 and 36 following melatonin. In January (experiment 1), naloxone evoked a significant (P<0·05) LH release at all times, however the LH increment in response to naloxone increased during oestradiol pretreatment (P<0·05) During the breeding season (experiments 2 and 3), naloxone induced a significant (P<0·05) increase in plasma LH concentrations when mares had not been pretreated with oestradiol or melatonin and after oestradiol pretreatment. Basal LH concentrations and the LH increment in response to naloxone increased significantly (P<0·05) during the 30-day oestradiol pretreatment. Melatonin decreased the naloxone-induced LH release and the LH release in response to naloxone and saline no longer differed after 25 and 35 days of melatonin pretreatment. When melatonin was given together with oestradiol for 20 days, again a significant (P<0·05) LH release in response to naloxone occurred. Prolactin release was significantly (P<0·05) increased by naloxone when mares had been pretreated with only melatonin. The opioid antagonist did not affect prolactin release in mares that had not been pretreated or received oestradiol either alone or in combination with melatonin. In conclusion, in long-term ovariectomized mares, opioids inhibit LH secretion independent from ovarian factors. This opioid inhibition of LH secretion is enhanced by oestradiol and reduced by melatonin. Although short-term melatonin treatment in-activates the opioid regulation of LH release, a prolonged influence of melatonin as occurs in winter does not prevent activation of the opioid system. This indicates that effects of melatonin on the opioid regulation of LH release change with time. An opioid inhibition of prolactin secretion is activated by melatonin given for 15–35 days but is lost under the prolonged influence of a short-day melatonin signal in winter. Journal of Endocrinology (1997) 154, 241–248

Effects of corticotropin-releasing hormone and its antagonist on the gene expression of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and GnRH receptor in the hypothalamus and anterior pituitary gland of follicular phase ewes

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (6) ◽  
pp. 780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magdalena Ciechanowska ◽  
Magdalena Łapot ◽  
Tadeusz Malewski ◽  
Krystyna Mateusiak ◽  
Tomasz Misztal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Pituitary Gland ◽  
Anterior Pituitary ◽  
Follicular Phase ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Corticotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion ◽  
Crh Receptors

There is no information in the literature regarding the effect of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) on genes encoding gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the GnRH receptor (GnRHR) in the hypothalamus or on GnRHR gene expression in the pituitary gland in vivo. Thus, the aim of the present study was to investigate, in follicular phase ewes, the effects of prolonged, intermittent infusion of small doses of CRH or its antagonist (α-helical CRH 9-41; CRH-A) into the third cerebral ventricle on GnRH mRNA and GnRHR mRNA levels in the hypothalamo–pituitary unit and on LH secretion. Stimulation or inhibition of CRH receptors significantly decreased or increased GnRH gene expression in the hypothalamus, respectively, and led to different responses in GnRHR gene expression in discrete hypothalamic areas. For example, CRH increased GnRHR gene expression in the preoptic area, but decreased it in the hypothalamus/stalk median eminence and in the anterior pituitary gland. In addition, CRH decreased LH secretion. Blockade of CRH receptors had the opposite effect on GnRHR gene expression. The results suggest that activation of CRH receptors in the hypothalamus of follicular phase ewes can modulate the biosynthesis and release of GnRH through complex changes in the expression of GnRH and GnRHR genes in the hypothalamo–anterior pituitary unit.

Learning and Memory Impairment with Benzhexol

1987 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 612-614 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cherrie A. Galletly ◽  
Colin D. Field
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Motor Skills ◽  
Memory Impairment ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Double Blind Trial ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Term Memory ◽  
New Learning ◽  
Significant Impairment

A double-blind trial to determine the effects of a single dose of 2 mg benzhexol on cognitive functioning was undertaken using normal volunteers. Ninety minutes after the drug or placebo was taken, subjects completed a battery of psychological tests designed to measure learning, memory and motor skills. Benzhexol ingestion was associated with significant impairment of short-term memory and slowing of the rate of new learning.

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) overcomes GnRH antagonist-induced suppression of LH secretion in primates

1986 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-150 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Marshall ◽  
F. Bint Akhtar ◽  
G. F. Weinbauer ◽  
E. Nieschlag
Keyword(s):  
Gnrh Antagonist ◽  
Receptor Occupancy ◽  
Gnrh Receptor ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Response Curves ◽  
Gnrh Antagonists ◽  
Releasing Hormone ◽  
Gonadotrophin Secretion ◽  
Gonadotrophin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Lh Secretion

ABSTRACT If the suppressive effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists on gonadotrophin secretion are mediated through GnRH-receptor occupancy alone, it should be possible to restore serum gonadotrophin levels by displacing the antagonist with exogenous GnRH. To test this hypothesis, eight adult crab-eating macaques (Macaca fascicularis), weight 4·7–7·6 kg, were subjected to the following treatment regimens. A GnRH-stimulation test was performed before and 4, 12 and 24 h after a single s.c. injection of the GnRH antagonist (N-Ac-d-p-Cl-Phe1,2,d-Trp3,d-Arg6,d-Ala10)-GnRH (ORG 30276). The stimulation tests were performed with 0·5, 5·0 or 50 μg GnRH given as a single i.v. bolus. Blood was taken before and 15, 30 and 60 min after each bolus for analysis of bioactive LH and testosterone. The GnRH-challenging doses were given as follows: 0·5 μg GnRH was injected at 0 and 4 h, followed by 5·0 μg after 12 h and 50 μg after 24 h. One week later, 5·0 μg GnRH were given at 0 and 4 h, followed by 50 μg after 12 h and 0·5 μg after 24 h. Finally, after another week, the GnRH challenges began with 50 μg at 0 and 4 h, followed by 0·5 μg at 12 h and 5·0 μg at 24 h. This design permitted comparison of the LH and testosterone responses with respect to the dose of GnRH and the time after administration of GnRH antagonist. The areas under the response curves were measured and statistical evaluation was carried out by means of non-parametric two-way analysis of variance followed by the multiple comparisons of Wilcoxon and Wilcox. Four hours after the antagonist was injected, the LH and testosterone responses to all three doses of GnRH were suppressed. At the lowest dose of GnRH (0·5 μg) the responses remained reduced even after 24 h, whereas the higher doses of GnRH elicited an LH and testosterone response at 12 and 24 h which was not significantly different from that at 0 h. These data demonstrate that the suppression of LH secretion by a GnRH antagonist in vivo can be overcome by exogenously administered GnRH in a dose- and time-dependent manner, thus strongly supporting the contention that GnRH antagonists prevent gonadotrophin secretion by GnRH-receptor occupancy. J. Endocr. (1986) 110, 145–150

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document