Human heat balance during postexercise recovery: separating metabolic and nonthermal effects

2008 ◽  
Vol 294 (5) ◽  
pp. R1586-R1592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ollie Jay ◽  
Daniel Gagnon ◽  
Michel B. DuCharme ◽  
Paul Webb ◽  
Francis D. Reardon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Heat Production ◽  
Heat Balance ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Total Heat ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Active Recovery ◽  
Total Heat Loss ◽  
Body Heat

Previous studies report greater postexercise heat loss responses during active recovery relative to inactive recovery despite similar core temperatures between conditions. Differences have been ascribed to nonthermal factors influencing heat loss response control since elevations in metabolism during active recovery are assumed to be insufficient to change core temperature and modify heat loss responses. However, from a heat balance perspective, different rates of total heat loss with corresponding rates of metabolism are possible at any core temperature. Seven male volunteers cycled at 75% of V̇o2peak in the Snellen whole body air calorimeter regulated at 25.0°C, 30% relative humidity (RH), for 15 min followed by 30 min of active (AR) or inactive (IR) recovery. Relative to IR, a greater rate of metabolic heat production (Ṁ − Ẇ) during AR was paralleled by a greater rate of total heat loss (ḢL) and a greater local sweat rate, despite similar esophageal temperatures between conditions. At end-recovery, rate of body heat storage, that is, [(Ṁ − Ẇ) − ḢL] approached zero similarly in both conditions, with Ṁ − Ẇ and ḢL elevated during AR by 91 ± 26 W and 93 ± 25 W, respectively. Despite a higher Ṁ − Ẇ during AR, change in body heat content from calorimetry was similar between conditions due to a slower relative decrease in ḢL during AR, suggesting an influence of nonthermal factors. In conclusion, different levels of heat loss are possible at similar core temperatures during recovery modes of different metabolic rates. Evidence for nonthermal influences upon heat loss responses must therefore be sought after accounting for differences in heat production.

Exercise-rest cycles do not alter local and whole body heat loss responses

2011 ◽  
Vol 300 (4) ◽  
pp. R958-R968 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gagnon ◽  
Glen P. Kenny
Keyword(s):  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Intermittent Exercise ◽  
Sweat Rate ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Evaporative Heat Loss ◽  
Esophageal Temperature ◽  
Direct Calorimetry ◽  
Body Heat

Previous studies have suggested that greater core temperatures during intermittent exercise (Ex) are due to attenuated sweating [upper back sweat rate (SR)] and skin blood flow (SkBF) responses. We evaluated the hypothesis that heat loss is not altered during exercise-rest cycles (ER). Ten male participants randomly performed four 120-min trials: 1) 60-min Ex and 60-min recovery (60ER); 2) 3 × 20-min Ex separated by 20-min recoveries (20ER); 3) 6 × 10-min Ex separated by 10-min recoveries (10ER), or 4) 12 × 5-min Ex separated by 5-min recoveries (5ER). Exercise was performed at a workload of 130 W at 35°C. Whole body heat exchange was determined by direct calorimetry. Core temperature, SR (by ventilated capsule), and SkBF (by laser-doppler) were measured continuously. Evaporative heat loss (EHL) progressively increased with each ER, such that it was significantly greater ( P ≤ 0.05) at the end of the last compared with the first Ex for 5ER (299 ± 39 vs. 440 ± 41 W), 10ER (425 ± 51 vs. 519 ± 45 W), and 20ER (515 ± 63 vs. 575 ± 74 W). The slope of the EHL response against esophageal temperature significantly increased from the first to the last Ex within the 10ER (376 ± 56 vs. 445 ± 89 W/°C, P ≤ 0.05) and 20ER (535 ± 85 vs. 588 ± 28 W/°C, P ≤ 0.05) conditions, but not during 5ER (296 ± 96 W/°C vs. 278 ± 95 W/°C, P = 0.237). In contrast, the slope of the SkBF response against esophageal temperature did not significantly change from the first to the last Ex (5ER: 51 ± 23 vs. 54 ± 19%/°C, P = 0.848; 10ER: 53 ± 8 vs. 56 ± 21%/°C, P = 0.786; 20ER: 44 ± 20 vs. 50 ± 27%/°C, P = 0.432). Overall, no differences in body heat content and core temperature were observed. These results suggest that altered local and whole body heat loss responses do not explain the previously observed greater core temperatures during intermittent exercise.

scholarly journals Influence of mild cold on 24 h energy expenditure, resting metabolism and diet-induced thermogenesis

1981 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 257-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. J. Dauncey
Keyword(s):  
Energy Expenditure ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Production ◽  
Total Heat ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Partial Replacement ◽  
Total Heat Loss ◽  
Resting Metabolism ◽  
Diet Induced Thermogenesis ◽  
Lower Temperature

1. It has been suggested previously that people in developed countries do not expose themselves to cold severe enough to induce a metabolic response. The energy expenditure, as both heat production and total heat loss, of nine women was therefore measured continuously while each lived for 30 h in a whole-body calorimeter on two occasions, one at 28° and the other at 22°. All subjects followed a predetermined pattern of activity and food intake. The environmental conditions were judged by the subjects to be within those encountered in everyday life. In the standard clothing worn, 28° was considered to be comfortably warm but not too hot, while 22° was judged to be cool but not too cold.2. Heat production for 24 h was significantly greater at the lower temperature, by (mean ± SE) 7.0 ± 1.1%. The range was between 2 and 12%. Total heat loss was also significantly greater, by 6%, and there was a large change in the partition of heat loss. At the lower temperature sensible heat loss increased by 29% while evaporative heat loss decreased by 39%.3. Resting metabolism measured in the morning 12–13 h after the last meal was significantly greater at 22° than at 28°, whereas there was no difference when the resting measurement was made for 2.5 h following a meal.4. In conclusion: (a)environmental temperature may play a more important role than was previously recognized in the energy balance of those living in this country, and (b) there is an indication of at least a partial replacement of cold-induced by diet-induced thermogenesis in man.

Heat Flow and Distribution during Induction of General Anesthesia 

1995 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 662-673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Matsukawa ◽  
Daniel I. Sessler ◽  
Andrew M. Sessler ◽  
Marc Schroeder ◽  
Makoto Ozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Heat Balance ◽  
Thermal Flux ◽  
Control Period ◽  
Internal Heat ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Change In Mean ◽  
Body Heat

Background Core hypothermia after induction of general anesthesia results from an internal core-to-peripheral redistribution of body heat and a net loss of heat to the environment. However, the relative contributions of each mechanism remain unknown. The authors evaluated regional body heat content and the extent to which core hypothermia after induction of anesthesia resulted from altered heat balance and internal heat redistribution. Methods Six minimally clothed male volunteers in an approximately 22 degrees C environment were evaluated for 2.5 control hours before induction of general anesthesia and for 3 subsequent hours. Overall heat balance was determined from the difference between cutaneous heat loss (thermal flux transducers) and metabolic heat production (oxygen consumption). Arm and leg tissue heat contents were determined from 19 intramuscular needle thermocouples, 10 skin temperatures, and "deep" foot temperature. To separate the effects of redistribution and net heat loss, we multiplied the change in overall heat balance by body weight and the specific heat of humans. The resulting change in mean body temperature was subtracted from the change in distal esophageal (core) temperature, leaving the core hypothermia specifically resulting from redistribution. Results Core temperature was nearly constant during the control period but decreased 1.6 +/- 0.3 degree C in the first hour of anesthesia. Redistribution contributed 81% to this initial decrease and required transfer of 46 kcal from the trunk to the extremities. During the subsequent 2 h of anesthesia, core temperature decreased an additional 1.1 +/- 0.3 degree C, with redistribution contributing only 43%. Thus, only 17 kcal was redistributed during the second and third hours of anesthesia. Redistribution therefore contributed 65% to the entire 2.8 +/- 0.5 degree C decrease in core temperature during the 3 h of anesthesia. Proximal extremity heat content decreased slightly after induction of anesthesia, but distal heat content increased markedly. The distal extremities thus contributed most to core cooling. Although the arms constituted only a fifth of extremity mass, redistribution increased arm heat content nearly as much as leg heat content. Distal extremity heat content increased approximately 40 kcal during the first hour of anesthesia and remained elevated for the duration of the study. Conclusions The arms and legs are both important components of the peripheral thermal compartment, but distal segments contribute most. Core hypothermia during the first hour after induction resulted largely from redistribution of body heat, and redistribution remained the major cause even after 3 h of anesthesia.

Light masking of circadian rhythms of heat production, heat loss, and body temperature in squirrel monkeys

1999 ◽  
Vol 276 (2) ◽  
pp. R298-R307 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward L. Robinson ◽  
Charles A. Fuller
Keyword(s):  
Body Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Production ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Direct Calorimetry ◽  
Set Point ◽  
Subjective Night ◽  
Timing System ◽  
Circadian Timing System ◽  
Body Heat

Whole body heat production (HP) and heat loss (HL) were examined to determine their relative contributions to light masking of the circadian rhythm in body temperature (Tb). Squirrel monkey metabolism ( n = 6) was monitored by both indirect and direct calorimetry, with telemetered measurement of body temperature and activity. Feeding was also measured. Responses to an entraining light-dark (LD) cycle (LD 12:12) and a masking LD cycle (LD 2:2) were compared. HP and HL contributed to both the daily rhythm and the masking changes in Tb. All variables showed phase-dependent masking responses. Masking transients at L or D transitions were generally greater during subjective day; however, L masking resulted in sustained elevation of Tb, HP, and HL during subjective night. Parallel, apparently compensatory, changes of HL and HP suggest action by both the circadian timing system and light masking on Tb set point. Furthermore, transient HL increases during subjective night suggest that gain change may supplement set point regulation of Tb.

scholarly journals Sex-related differences in local and whole-body heat loss responses: Physical or physiological?

2014 ◽  
Vol 39 (7) ◽  
pp. 843-843
Author(s):  
Daniel Gagnon
Keyword(s):  
Sex Differences ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Production ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Metabolic Heat Production ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Fixed Rate ◽  
The Third ◽  
Metabolic Heat ◽  
Body Heat

The current thesis examined whether sex differences in local and whole-body heat loss are evident after accounting for confounding differences in physical characteristics and rate of metabolic heat production. Three experimental studies were performed: the first examined whole-body heat loss in males and females matched for body mass and surface area during exercise at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production; the second examined local and whole-body heat loss responses between sexes during exercise at increasing requirements for heat loss; the third examined sex-differences in local sweating and cutaneous vasodilation to given doses of pharmacological agonists, as well as during passive heating. The first study demonstrated that females exhibit a lower whole-body sudomotor thermosensitivity (553 ± 77 vs. 795 ± 85 W·°C−1, p = 0.05) during exercise performed at a fixed rate of metabolic heat production. The second study showed that whole-body sudomotor thermosensitivity is similar between sexes at a requirement for heat loss of 250 W·m−2 (496 ± 139 vs. 483 ± 185 W·m−2·°C−1, p = 0.91) and 300 W·m−2 (283 ± 70 vs. 211 ± 66 W·m−2·°C−1, p = 0.17), only becoming greater in males at a requirement for heat loss of 350 W·m−2 (197 ± 61 vs. 82 ± 27 W·m−2·°C−1, p = 0.007). In the third study, a lower sweat rate to the highest concentration of acetylcholine (0.27 ± 0.08 vs. 0.48 ± 0.13 mg·min−1·cm−2, p = 0.02) and methacholine (0.41 ± 0.09 vs. 0.57 ± 0.11 mg·min−1·cm−2, p = 0.04) employed was evidenced in females, with no differences in cholinergic sensitivity. Taken together, the results of the current thesis show that sex itself can modulate sudomotor activity, specifically the thermosensitivity of the response, during both exercise and passive heat stress. Furthermore, the results of the third study point towards a peripheral modulation of the sweat gland as a mechanism responsible for the lower sudomotor thermosensitivity in females.

Temperature gradients in pigs during whole-body hyperthermia at 42 degrees C

1979 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 712-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Dickson ◽  
A. McKenzie ◽  
K. McLeod
Keyword(s):  
Core Temperature ◽  
Brain Temperature ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Temperature Gradients ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Induction Phase ◽  
Equilibrium Conditions ◽  
Repeated Heating ◽  
Deep Body ◽  
Body Heat

Temperature was simultaneously measured by thermistors in multiple deep-body and peripheral sites in adult pigs heated continuously at 42 degrees C (rectal) and above for 4–24 h. During hyperthermia, the relations between different body temperatures were maintained and up to 1.0 degrees C separated temperature measurements at sites such as liver and bone marrow. These persistent temperature gradients must be borne in mind when evaluating tumor response in patients subjected to whole-body heating for disseminated cancer. Temperatures recorded by rectal, deep esophageal, or tympanic membrane sensors provided a reliable index of core temperature (including brain temperature) under equilibrium conditions at 42 degrees C, but only esophageal and tympanic sensors could safely be used to monitor the induction phase of hyperthermia and the adjustive changes in body-heat content required to stabilize core temperature during sustained hyperthermia. Pigs withstood repeated heating at 42 degrees C for 6 h, and recovered rapidly, but died after 24 h of hyperthermia. Pigs subjected to unrestrained heating died at 45 degrees C (esophagus).

scholarly journals The contribution of the mouse tail to thermoregulation is modest

2020 ◽  
Vol 319 (2) ◽  
pp. E438-E446
Author(s):  
Vojtěch Škop ◽  
Naili Liu ◽  
Juen Guo ◽  
Oksana Gavrilova ◽  
Marc L. Reitman
Keyword(s):  
Metabolic Rate ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Dissipation ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Total Heat Loss ◽  
Brown Adipose ◽  
Adrenergic Antagonist ◽  
Similar Body ◽  
And Control ◽  
Body Heat

Understanding mouse thermal physiology informs the usefulness of mice as models of human disease. It is widely assumed that the mouse tail contributes greatly to heat loss (as it does in rat), but this has not been quantitated. We studied C57BL/6J mice after tail amputation. Tailless mice housed at 22°C did not differ from littermate controls in body weight, lean or fat content, or energy expenditure. With acute changes in ambient temperature from 19 to 39°C, tailless and control mice demonstrated similar body temperatures (Tb), metabolic rates, and heat conductances and no difference in thermoneutral point. Treatment with prazosin, an α1-adrenergic antagonist and vasodilator, increased tail temperature in control mice by up to 4.8 ± 0.8°C. Comparing prazosin treatment in tailless and control mice suggested that the tail’s contribution to total heat loss was a nonsignificant 3.4%. Major heat stress produced by treatment at 30°C with CL316243, a β3-adrenergic agonist, increased metabolic rate and Tb and, at a matched increase in metabolic rate, the tailless mice showed a 0.72 ± 0.14°C greater Tb increase and 7.6% lower whole body heat conductance. Thus, the mouse tail is a useful biomarker of vasodilation and thermoregulation, but in our experiments contributes only 5–8% of whole body heat dissipation, less than the 17% reported for rat. Heat dissipation through the tail is important under extreme scenarios such as pharmacological activation of brown adipose tissue; however, non-tail contributions to heat loss may have been underestimated in the mouse.

scholarly journals Fitness-related differences in the rate of whole-body total heat loss in exercising young healthy women are heat-load dependent

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 312-317 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dallon T. Lamarche ◽  
Sean R. Notley ◽  
Martin P. Poirier ◽  
Glen P. Kenny
Keyword(s):  
Heat Loss ◽  
Heat Load ◽  
Total Heat ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Total Heat Loss ◽  
Healthy Women

scholarly journals Thermal behavior alleviates thermal discomfort during steady-state exercise without affecting whole body heat loss

2019 ◽  
Vol 127 (4) ◽  
pp. 984-994 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole T. Vargas ◽  
Christopher L. Chapman ◽  
Blair D. Johnson ◽  
Rob Gathercole ◽  
Matthew N. Cramer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Light Intensity ◽  
Thermal Behavior ◽  
Skin Temperature ◽  
Heat Loss ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Upper Body ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Mean Skin Temperature ◽  
Thermal Discomfort ◽  
Body Heat

We tested the hypothesis that thermal behavior resulting in reductions in mean skin temperature alleviates thermal discomfort and mitigates the rise in core temperature during light-intensity exercise. In a 27 ± 0°C, 48 ± 6% relative humidity environment, 12 healthy subjects (6 men, 6 women) completed 60 min of recumbent cycling. In both trials, subjects wore a water-perfused suit top continually perfusing 34 ± 0°C water. In the behavior trial, subjects maintained their upper body thermally comfortable by pressing a button to perfuse cool water (2.2 ± 0.5°C) through the top for 2 min per button press. Metabolic heat production (control: 404 ± 52 W, behavior: 397 ± 65 W; P = 0.44) was similar between trials. Mean skin temperature was reduced in the behavior trial (by −2.1 ± 1.8°C, P < 0.01) because of voluntary reductions in water-perfused top temperature ( P < 0.01). Whole body ( P = 0.02) and local sweat rates were lower in the behavior trial ( P ≤ 0.05). Absolute core temperature was similar ( P ≥ 0.30); however, the change in core temperature was greater in the behavior trial after 40 min of exercise ( P ≤ 0.03). Partitional calorimetry did not reveal any differences in cumulative heat storage (control: 554 ± 229, behavior: 544 ± 283 kJ; P = 0.90). Thermal behavior alleviated whole body thermal discomfort during exercise (by −1.17 ± 0.40 arbitrary units, P < 0.01). Despite lower evaporative cooling in the behavior trial, similar heat loss was achieved by voluntarily employing convective cooling. Therefore, thermal behavior resulting in large reductions in skin temperature is effective at alleviating thermal discomfort during exercise without affecting whole body heat loss. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of thermal behavior in maintaining thermal comfort during exercise by allowing subjects to voluntarily cool their torso and upper limbs with 2°C water throughout a light-intensity exercise protocol. We show that voluntary cooling of the upper body alleviates thermal discomfort while maintaining heat balance through convective rather than evaporative means of heat loss.

Core Cooling by Central Venous Infusion of Ice-cold (4°C and 20°C) Fluid

2000 ◽  
Vol 93 (3) ◽  
pp. 629-637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Rajek ◽  
Robert Greif ◽  
Daniel I. Sessler ◽  
James Baumgardner ◽  
Sonja Laciny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapeutic Hypothermia ◽  
Core Temperature ◽  
Heat Balance ◽  
Heat Content ◽  
Partial Recovery ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Metabolic Heat ◽  
Cold Fluid ◽  
Venous Infusion ◽  
Body Heat

Background Central venous infusion of cold fluid may be a useful method of inducing therapeutic hypothermia. The aim of this study was to quantify systemic heat balance and regional distribution of body heat during and after central infusion of cold fluid. Methods The authors studied nine volunteers, each on two separate days. Anesthesia was maintained with use of isoflurane, and on each day 40 ml/kg saline was infused centrally over 30 min. On one day, the fluid was 20 degrees C and on the other it was 4 degrees C. By use of a tympanic membrane probe core (trunk and head) temperature and heat content were evaluated. Peripheral compartment (arm and leg) temperature and heat content were estimated with use of fourth-order regressions and integration over volume from 18 intramuscular thermocouples, nine skin temperatures, and "deep" hand and foot temperature. Oxygen consumption and cutaneous heat flux estimated systemic heat balance. Results After 30-min infusion of 4 degrees C or 20 degrees C fluid, core temperature decreased 2.5 +/- 0.4 degrees C and 1.4 +/- 0.2 degrees C, respectively. This reduction in core temperature was 0.8 degrees C and 0.4 degrees C more than would be expected if the change in body heat content were distributed in proportion to body mass. Reduced core temperature resulted from three factors: (1) 10-20% because cutaneous heat loss exceeded metabolic heat production; (2) 50-55% from the systemic effects of the cold fluid per se; and (3) approximately 30% because the reduction in core heat content remained partially constrained to core tissues. The postinfusion period was associated with a rapid and spontaneous recovery of core temperature. This increase in core temperature was not associated with a peripheral-to-core redistribution of body heat because core temperature remained warmer than peripheral tissues even at the end of the infusion. Instead, it resulted from constraint of metabolic heat to the core thermal compartment. Conclusions Central venous infusion of cold fluid decreases core temperature more than would be expected were the reduction in body heat content proportionately distributed. It thus appears to be an effective method of rapidly inducing therapeutic hypothermia. When the infusion is complete, there is a spontaneous partial recovery in core temperature that facilitates rewarming to normothermia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document