scholarly journals Role of Dexmedetomidine in Early POCD in Patients Undergoing Thoracic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Jiao Ran ◽  
Xiao Bai ◽  
Rurong Wang ◽  
Xuehan Li
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Cognitive Decline ◽  
Significant Difference

Importance. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) occurs in 6%–53% of elderly patients receiving major surgery and is related to longer hospital stays, increased hospital costs, and 1-year mortality. An increasing number of studies suggest that using dexmedetomidine (Dex) in critical care units is associated with reduced incidence of delirium. However, perioperative use of Dex for the prevention of POCD has not been well studied. Objective. To evaluate whether a low-dose perioperative infusion of Dex reduces early POCD. Design. This study was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that randomly assigned patients to Dex or saline placebo infused during surgery and patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) infusion. Patients were assessed for postoperative cognitive decline. Interventions. Dex was infused at a loading dose of 0.5 μg/kg intravenously (15 min after entering the operation room) followed by a continuous infusion at a rate of 0.5 μg/kg/h until one-lung ventilation or artificial pneumothorax ended. Patients in the Dex group received regular PCIA pump with additional dose of Dex (200 μg). Results. In total, 126 patients were randomized, and 102 patients were involved in the result analysis. The incidence of POCD was 36.54% (19/52) in the Dex group and 32.00% (16/50) in the normal saline (NS) group, with no statistic difference. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status-Modified (TICS-m) scores at different times. However, the TICS-m score at 7 days after surgery was significantly lower than that at 30 days in 102 patients ( 32.93 ± 0.42 vs. 33.92 ± 0.47 , P = 0.03 ). The visual analogue scale scores in the Dex group were significantly lower than those in the NS group 1 day postoperation at rest and activity (2.00 [1.00–3.00] vs. 3.00 [2.00–4.00], P < 0.01 ; 4.00 [3.00–5.00] vs. 5.00 [4.00–6.00], P < 0.05 , respectively). Patients receiving Dex or NS had no statistical difference in activities of daily living (ADLs) scores at 7 and 30 days after surgery, but the ADL score at 30 days after surgery showed a significant reduction compared with that at 7 days ( P < 0.01 ). Patients in the Dex group had a shorter hospital length of stay ( 15.26 ± 3.77 vs. 17.69 ± 5.09 , P = 0.02 ) and less expenses ( 52458.71 ± 10649.30 vs. 57269.03 ± 9269.98 , P = 0.04 ) than those in the NS group. Conclusions. Low-dose Dex in the perioperative period did not reduce the incidence of early POCD in thoracic surgery. However, it relieved postoperative pain, decreased the hospitalization expenses, and shortened the length of stay.

Preoperative nutritional status impacts clinical outcome and hospital length of stay in pelvic exenteration patients – a retrospective study

2021 ◽  
pp. 026010602110090
Author(s):  
Sophie Hogan ◽  
Daniel Steffens ◽  
Kenneth Vuong ◽  
Anna Rangan ◽  
Michael Solomon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Pelvic Exenteration ◽  
Postoperative Outcomes ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Nutrition Screening ◽  
Patient Cohort ◽  
Post Surgery

Background: Preoperative malnutrition is common in surgical oncology patients and can have negative effects on postoperative outcomes. Pelvic exenteration is major surgery associated with high morbidity rates. Associations between preoperative malnutrition, determined using the patient-generated subjective global assessment, and postoperative outcomes in this patient cohort has not yet been investigated. Aim: To determine if preoperative nutritional status is associated with postoperative surgical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes after pelvic exenteration surgery. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a quaternary hospital investigating 123 patients who had pelvic exenteration surgery from January 2017 to August 2019. Preoperative nutritional status and postoperative surgical and QoL outcomes were collected and analysed to determine any associations. Results: Overall, 49.6% of patients were female with a median age of 59 years. Forty patients (32.5%) were malnourished and 83 (67.5%) were well nourished before surgery. Well-nourished patients had a shorter length of hospital stay ( p = 0.034) and at 6 months post-surgery, presented with a significantly better physical and mental QoL score ( p = 0.038 and p = 0.001 respectively). The regression analyses showed that intensive care unit (ICU) readmission rates were 7.19 times more likely to occur in malnourished patients ( p = 0.022). Conclusions: Preoperative malnutrition is associated with increased length of stay, ICU readmissions and poorer QoL following pelvic exenteration. Nutrition screening, assessment and optimisation of management are essential in this patient cohort to improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to measure the effect of interventions and identify the most beneficial model of care for this complex patient group.

Abstract 13811: Cognitive and Psychological Outcomes of Patients 6 Months After Cardiac Arrest or Intensive Care Stay

Circulation ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 144 (Suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew R Potter ◽  
Marco Mion ◽  
Eleni A Nikolopoulou ◽  
Neil Magee ◽  
Kelly Farrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Icu Patients ◽  
Icu Stay ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: The neuropsychological and cognitive consequences of an ICU stay can cause a large burden on many patients. In this study, we assessed the outcomes of a group of patients attending a newly set up, multi-disciplinary outpatient clinic focused on assessing neuropsychological and cognitive outcomes following a significant (>72 hours) ICU stay, and compared patients whose ICU was post-OHCA (out of hospital cardiac arrest), and those non-OHCA. Methods: Between 2016 and 2019, 152 patients were assessed within the Care after REsuscitation (CARE) / ICU follow up clinic, 6 months following hospital discharge, using the SF-36, HADS, PTSS-14 and MoCA. The OHCA group were compared to other non-OHCA, ICU patients (>72 hour stay). Results: No significant differences (p<0.05) were found between the groups outcomes, however we found that 6 months post-discharge, the non-OHCA group experience significantly more pain, are older, and required a longer length of stay (p<0.05). However, we found compared to normative data of the SF-36, over half of the OHCA group (on 6 out of the 8 subscales) and the non-OHCA (on 7 out of the 8) were below population norms, especially Role-Physical (66.7% OHCA and 71.6% non-OHCA) and Energy/ fatigue (66.7% OHCA and 61.4% non-OHCA). Anxiety was observed in 33.3% of the OHCA group, and 35.2% of the non-OHCA group had an abnormal total HADS score. PTSD was seen in 12.7% of the OHCA group and 10.2% of the non-OHCA group. Cognitive impairment was observed in 61.9% of OHCA and 59.1% of non-OHCA patients. Age and hospital length of stay had no significant effect on outcomes on our OHCA population, however females had significantly worse health related quality of life (HRQoL) on 6 out of the 8 subscales (p<0.05). Conclusion: Despite the OHCA and non-OHCA groups having no significant difference between their outcomes, there is a great disease burden upon many individuals following ICU stay, with many experiencing poor HRQoL, mood disorders, PTSD and cognitive impairment. The factors contributing to poor outcome following both ICU related illness and cardiac arrest should be further studied. The creation and validation of new assessment tools is imperative to ensure we fully appreciate the extent of the morbidity in this group to improve care for all ICU patients.

scholarly journals Does emergency medicine length of stay predict trauma outcomes at a Level 1 Trauma Center?

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin Powers Kinney ◽  
Kamal Gursahani ◽  
Eric Armbrecht ◽  
Preeti Dalawari
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Hospital Capacity ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level 1 ◽  
Level 1 Trauma Center

Objective: Previous studies looking at emergency department (ED) crowding and delays of care on outcome measures for certain medical and surgical patients excluded trauma patients. The objectives of this study were to assess the relationship of trauma patients’ ED length of stay (EDLOS) on hospital length of stay (HLOS) and on mortality; and to examine the association of ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Methods: This was a retrospective database review of Level 1 and 2 trauma patients at a single site Level 1 Trauma Center in the Midwest over a one year period. Out of a sample of 1,492, there were 1,207 patients in the analysis after exclusions. The main outcome was the difference in hospital mortality by EDLOS group (short was less than 4 hours vs. long, greater than 4 hours). HLOS was compared by EDLOS group, stratified by Trauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) category (< 0.5, 0.51-0.89, > 0.9) to describe the association between ED and hospital capacity on EDLOS.Results: There was no significant difference in mortality by EDLOS (4.8% short and 4% long, p = .5). There was no significant difference in HLOS between EDLOS, when adjusted for TRISS. ED census did not affect EDLOS (p = .59), however; EDLOS was longer when the percentage of staffed hospital beds available was lower (p < .001).Conclusions: While hospital overcrowding did increase EDLOS, there was no association between EDLOS and mortality or HLOS in leveled trauma patients at this institution.

Comparison of perioperative outcomes in endovascular versus open repair for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms: A propensity-matched analysis

Vascular ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 339-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan T Orr ◽  
Daniel L Davenport ◽  
David J Minion ◽  
Eleftherios S Xenos
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Propensity Scoring ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Open Aortic Repair ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective Endoluminal aortic aneurysm repair is suitable within certain anatomic specifications. This study aims to compare 30-day outcomes of endovascular versus open repairs for juxtarenal and pararenal aortic aneurysms (JAA/PAAs). Methods The ACS-NSQIP database was queried from 2012 to 2015 for JAA/PAA repairs. Procedures characterized as emergent were included in the study; however, failed prior repairs and ruptured aneurysms were excluded. The preoperative and perioperative patient characteristics, operative techniques, and outcome variables were compared between the open aortic repair and the endovascular aortic repair groups. Propensity scoring was performed to clinically match open aortic repair and endovascular aortic repair groups on preoperative risk and select perioperative factors that differed significantly in the unmatched groups. Outcome comparisons were then performed between matched groups. Results A total of 1005 (789 JAAs and 216 PAAs) aneurysm repairs were included in the study. Of these, there were 395 endovascular aortic repairs and 610 open aortic repairs. Propensity scoring created a matched group of 263 endovascular aortic repair and 263 open aortic repair patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality rates between matched endovascular aortic repair and open aortic repair patients (2.7% vs. 5.7%). The endovascular aortic repair group had a shorter ICU length of stay and overall hospital stay. The 30-day morbidity significantly favored endovascular aortic repair over open aortic repair (16% vs. 35%, p < 0.001). The main drivers of morbidity for endovascular aortic repair versus open aortic repair included return to the OR (6.8% vs. 15%, p < 0.001), rate of cardiac or respiratory failure (7.6% vs. 21%, p = 0.001), rate of renal insufficiency or failure (3.8% vs. 9.9%, p = 0.009), and rate of pneumonia (1.5% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.004). Conclusions There is no difference in mortality rates between endovascular aortic repair versus open aortic repair when repairing JAAs/PAAs. There is a significant difference in overall morbidity, and ICU and hospital length of stay favoring endovascular aortic repair over open aortic repair. This supports the expanded applicability and efficacy of endovascular repair for complex aneurysms.

scholarly journals Effects of statins on clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (8) ◽  
pp. 030006052093858
Author(s):  
Rony M. Zeenny ◽  
Hanine Mansour ◽  
Wissam K Kabbara ◽  
Nibal Chamoun ◽  
Myriam Audi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Community Acquired Pneumonia ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Comorbid Conditions ◽  
C Reactive Protein ◽  
Reactive Protein ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chronic Use

Objective We evaluated the effect of chronic use of statins based on C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and hospital length of stay (LOS) in patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Methods We conducted a retrospective study over 12 months at a teaching hospital in Lebanon comparing patients with CAP taking chronic statins with patients not taking statins. Included patients with CAP were older than age 18 years and had two CRP level measures during hospitalization. CURB-65 criteria were used to assess the severity of pneumonia. A decrease in CRP levels on days 1 and 3, LOS, and normalization of fever were used to assess the response to antibiotics. Results Sixty-one patients were taking statins and 90 patients were not taking statins. Patients on statins had significantly more comorbid conditions; both groups had comparable CURB-65 scores. In both groups, no statistically significant difference was seen for the decrease in CRP level on days 1 and 3 and LOS. No difference in days to normalization of fever was detected in either group. Conclusion No association was found between the chronic use of statins and CRP levels, LOS, or days to fever normalization in patients with CAP.

Balanced Crystalloid Versus Normal Saline as Resuscitative Fluid in Diabetic Ketoacidosis

2022 ◽  
pp. 106002802110636
Author(s):  
Adriana R. Carrillo ◽  
Kirsten Elwood ◽  
Chris Werth ◽  
Jessica Mitchell ◽  
Preeyaporn Sarangarm
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Serum Creatinine ◽  
Diabetic Ketoacidosis ◽  
Fluid Resuscitation ◽  
Normal Saline ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Maximum Serum ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Balanced Crystalloid

Background: Large volume resuscitation with normal saline (NS) may be associated with iatrogenic hyperchloremia and renal injury. Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes associated with the use of Lactated Ringer’s (LR) compared to NS as resuscitative fluid in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Methods: Single-center, retrospective analysis of patients admitted for DKA. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of iatrogenic hyperchloremia associated with fluid resuscitation using balanced crystalloid compared to NS. Results Iatrogenic hyperchloremia occurred more frequently in the NS group compared to the LR group (74.4% vs 64.2%; P = 0.05). Mean maximum serum chloride was higher in the NS group (115.7 mmol/L vs 113.7 mmol/L; P = 0.004). Incidence of hypernatremia was higher in the NS group (18.3% vs 9.3%; P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI; however, mean change in serum creatinine at 48 hours showed a significantly greater decrease in the LR group (-0.15 mg/dL vs -0.04 mg/dL; P = 0.002). No significant differences were found in intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay or total hospital length of stay. Conclusion and Relevance This study found a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of iatrogenic hyperchloremia with the use of LR compared to NS as fluid resuscitation in DKA. Serum creatinine was more improved in the LR group versus NS group at 48 hours. Preferential use of balanced crystalloid for fluid resuscitation in DKA may reduce incidence of hyperchloremia and support renal recovery in this population.

Rotavirus vaccination impact, Ireland, implications for vaccine confidence and screening

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 281-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E Burns ◽  
Abigail M Collins ◽  
Una B Fallon ◽  
Paul V Marsden ◽  
Caitlin M Ni Shuilleabhain
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Positive Impact ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Vaccine Hesitancy ◽  
Rotavirus Vaccine ◽  
Immunization Schedule ◽  
Primary Immunization ◽  
Rotavirus Infection ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Rotavirus vaccine efficacy is well established. However, it is important to consistently demonstrate the positive impact of vaccination programmes in order to optimize uptake rates and combat vaccine hesitancy. Methods Routine data were used to examine rotavirus vaccine effectiveness in Ireland, including changes in age-specific crude incidence rates (CIRs), hospitalizations and hospital length of stay. National intussusception incidence was interrogated. Vaccination status of vaccine-eligible cases of rotavirus infection was determined. Results Nationally, a reduction in the CIR of rotavirus infection of 77.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 57.8–88.5%, P&lt;0.001] was observed post-inclusion of the rotavirus vaccine in the primary immunization schedule. A decrease in hospitalizations of 85.5% (95% CI 79.3–90.2%, P&lt;0.001), 86.5% (95% CI 82.9–89.4%, P&lt;0.001) and 78.5% (95% CI 74.7–81.9%, P&lt;0.001) was observed in children aged &lt;1, &lt;2 and &lt;5 years, respectively. Most hospitalizations occurred in infants too young to have been vaccinated. There was no significant difference in median length of stay for children hospitalized with rotavirus infection. Decreased CIRs and hospitalization rates in unvaccinated children aged between 2 and 5 years suggest community immunity. Vaccine non-protection was 0.13%. No increase in the national CIR of intussusception was observed. Conclusions Inclusion of the rotavirus vaccine in the Irish primary immunization schedule has resulted in a significant reduction in the burden of rotavirus infection. However, vaccine hesitancy remains a concern. With new vaccination programmes, risk of vaccine harms should be considered and mitigated in order to protect individuals and the integrity of the programme.

scholarly journals Effect of low-dose lidocaine on objective upper extremity strength and immediate pain relief following cervical interlaminar epidural injections: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 45 (10) ◽  
pp. 767-773
Author(s):  
Zachary L. McCormick ◽  
Taylor Burnham ◽  
Shellie Cunningham ◽  
Richard W Kendall ◽  
David Bougie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Radicular Pain ◽  
Spinal Block ◽  
Epidural Injections ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Double Blinded

BackgroundLow-dose lidocaine is a common diluent for analgesia following cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injection (CIESI). Concerns with this practice exist. A single-arm cohort reported that 20% of patients develop postprocedural upper extremity weakness when using lidocaine as a diluent. Furthermore, a high-cervical spinal block with unintended intrathecal or subdural administration is possible.ObjectiveDetermine if low-dose lidocaine as a diluent during CIESI causes clinically meaningful (1) upper extremity weakness and (2) immediate pain relief when compared with saline.DesignDouble-blinded randomized control trial.MethodsPatients with cervical radicular pain scheduled for CIESI were enrolled. Participants received lidocaine (CIESI-L) or saline (CIESI-S) as a diluent for the epidural injectate. Myotomal strength was measured with dynamometry before and between 20 and 30 min after CIESI. Pre-pain and post-pain scores were obtained. Primary and secondary outcomes were post-CIESI weakness of ≥20% (minimal clinically important difference (MCID)) in >1 myotome and ≥50% pain reduction on the numerical scale.Results120 participants (64 females (53%), mean age, 56 (SD 13.7) years) completed the study and were analyzed (CIESI-L n=60; CIESI-S n=60). There was no significant between-group difference in the proportion of participants with postprocedural weakness, CIESI-L 41.7% (95% CI, 29.8% to 54.5%), CIESL-S 50% (95% CI, 37.5% to 62.5%). Between-group comparison showed no significant difference in pain reduction, relative risk 1.53 (95% CI, 0.82 to 2.86).ConclusionLow-dose lidocaine as a diluent in CIESI does not significantly increase the risk of post-CIESI myotomal weakness when compared with saline, but also does not substantially increase the likelihood of immediate, meaningful pain relief.Trial registration detailsClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03127137); December 26, 2017.

scholarly journals Incidence of delirium in the Canadian emergency department and its consequences on hospital length of stay: a prospective observational multicentre cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. e018190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Émond ◽  
Valérie Boucher ◽  
Pierre-Hugues Carmichael ◽  
Philippe Voyer ◽  
Mathieu Pelletier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Length ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Hospital Ward ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Multicentre Cohort

ObjectiveWe aim to determine the incidence of delirium and describe its impacts on hospital length of stay (LOS) among non-delirious community-dwelling older adults with an 8-hour exposure to the emergency department (ED) environment.DesignThis is a prospective observational multicentre cohort study (March–July 2015). Patients were assessed two times per day during their entire ED stay and up to 24 hours on hospital ward.SettingThe study took place in four Canadian EDs.Participants338 included patients: (1) aged ≥65 years; (2) who had an ED stay ≥8 hours; (3) were admitted to hospital ward and (4) were independent/semi-independent.Main outcome(s) and measure(s)The primary outcomes of this study were incident delirium in the ED or within 24 hours of ward admission and ED and hospital LOS. Functional and cognitive status were assessed using validated Older Americans Resources and Services and the modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status tools. The Confusion Assessment Method was used to detect incident delirium. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to evaluate outcomes.ResultsMean age was 76.8 (±8.1), 17.7% were aged >85 years old and 48.8% were men. The mean incidence of delirium was 12.1% (n=41). Median IQR ED LOS was 32.4 (24.5–47.9) hours and hospital LOS was 146.6 (75.2–267.8) hours. Adjusted mean hospital LOS was increased by 105.4 hours (4.4 days) (95% CI 25.1 to 162.0, P<0.001) for patients who developed an episode of delirium compared with non-delirious patient.ConclusionsAn incident delirium was observed in one of eight independent/semi-independent older adults after an 8-hour ED exposure. An episode of delirium increases hospital LOS by 4 days and therefore has important implications for patients and could contribute to ED overcrowding through a deleterious feedback loop.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document