Belantamab Mafodotin and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: This Is Not Game Over

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annalisa Condorelli ◽  
Bruno Garibaldi ◽  
Caterina Gagliano ◽  
Alessandra Romano ◽  
Vittorio Del Fabro ◽  
...  

Although the therapeutic landscape for multiple myeloma (MM) has expanded, the disease always tends to relapse. In attempt to obtain deep and durable responses, each relapse requires the use of a new strategy. In recent years, new treatment options have emerged even for heavily treated patients. Novel, well-tolerated and highly effective therapies in the relapsed/refractory (RRMM) setting currently represent a real hope. Belantamab mafodotin (BLENREP™) is a first-in-class monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) whose target is B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) conjugated to the cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor monomethyl auristatin F (MMAF). Here, we present two cases of heavily pre-treated RRMM patients that were favorably treated with Belantamab mafodotin, obtaining at least a partial response. Treatment was well tolerated and is ongoing. This is a rare report on real life clinical use of Belantamab mafodotin outside of controlled clinical trials and provide information on efficacy and safety of this anti-myeloma new class of drugs.

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (s1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans C. Lee ◽  
Claudio Cerchione

The expanding therapeutic landscape of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) has contributed to significant improvements in patient outcomes. These have included combinations of proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), histone deacetylase inhibitors, and/or alkylating agents. More recently, the approval of the first-in-class nuclear export inhibitor selinexor and the first-in-class B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) belantamab mafodotin has helped address the current unmet need in patients refractory to PI, IMiD, and anti-CD38 mAb directed therapy, otherwise known as triple class refractory myeloma. With the growing number of treatment options in the RRMM therapeutic landscape, the choice and sequencing of drugs and combinations has become increasingly complex. In this review we discuss our approach and considerations in the treatment of both early and late RRRM based on best available data and our clinical experience.


2021 ◽  
pp. 107815522199553
Author(s):  
Joshua Richter ◽  
Vamshi Ruthwik Anupindi ◽  
Jason Yeaw ◽  
Suneel Kudaravalli ◽  
Stojan Zavisic ◽  
...  

Introduction Real-world evidence on later line treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is sparse. We evaluated clinical outcomes among RRMM patients in the 1-year following treatment with pomalidomide or daratumumab and compared economic outcomes between RRMM patients and non-MM patients. Patient and Methods Adult patients with ≥1 claim of pomalidomide or daratumumab were identified between January 2012 and February 2018 using IQVIA PharMetrics® Plus US claims database. Patients were required to have a diagnosis or treatment for MM and a claim of any immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors before the index date. Mean time to new therapy, overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier curve and adverse events (AEs) were reported over the 1-year post-index period. RRMM patients were also matched to a non-MM comparator cohort and economic outcomes were compared between the two cohorts. Results 289 RRMM patients were matched to 1,445 patients without MM. Most prevalent hematological AE was anemia (72.0%) and non-hematological AE was infections (75.4%). Mean (SD) time to a new treatment was 4.7 (5.3) months and median OS was 14.6 months. RRMM patients had significantly higher hospitalizations and physician office visits (Both P < .0001) compared to non-MM patients. Adjusting for baseline characteristics, patients with RRMM had 4.9 times (95% CI 3.8-6.4, P < .0001) the total healthcare costs compared with patients without MM. The major driver of total costs among RRMM patients was pharmacy costs (67.3%). Conclusion RRMM patients showed a high frequency of AEs, low OS, and a substantial economic burden suggesting need for effective treatment options.


2016 ◽  
Vol 174 (6) ◽  
pp. 911-922 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Lee ◽  
Danton Bounds ◽  
Jennifer Paterson ◽  
Gaelle Herledan ◽  
Katherine Sully ◽  
...  

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Feng Cho ◽  
Liang Lin ◽  
Lijie Xing ◽  
Yuyin Li ◽  
Tengteng Yu ◽  
...  

The treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has entered into a new era of immunotherapy. Novel immunotherapies will significantly improve patient outcome via simultaneously targeting malignant plasma cell (PC) and reversing immunocompromised bone marrow (BM) microenvironment. B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA), selectively expressed in PCs and a key receptor for A proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL), is highly expressed in MM cells from patients at all stages. The APRIL/BCMA signal cascades promote the survival and drug resistance of MM cells and further modulate immunosuppressive BM milieu. Impressively, anti-BCMA immunotherapeutic reagents, including chimeric antigen receptor (CAR), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) and bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) have all shown high response rates in their first clinical trials in relapse and refractory patients with very limited treatment options. These results rapidly inspired numerous development of next-generation anti-BCMA biotherapeutics, i.e., bispecific molecule, bispecific or trispecific antibodies, a novel form of CAR T/NK cells and T Cell Antigen Coupler (TAC) receptors, antibody-coupled T cell receptor (ACTR) as well as a cancer vaccine. We here highlight seminal preclinical and clinical studies on novel BCMA-based immunotherapies as effective monotherapy and discuss their potential in combination with current anti-MM and novel checkpoint drugs in earlier disease stages to further achieve durable responses in patients.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroko Nishida ◽  
Taketo Yamada

The treatment options in multiple myeloma (MM) has changed dramatically over the past decade with the development of novel agents such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs); bortezomib and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs); thalidomide, and lenalidomide which revealed high efficacy and improvement of overall survival (OS) in MM patients. However, despite these progresses, most patients relapse and become eventually refractory to these therapies. Thus, the development of novel, targeted immunotherapies has been pursued aggressively. Recently, next-generation PIs; carfilzomib and ixazomib, IMiD; pomalidomide, histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDADi); panobinostat and monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs); and elotuzumab and daratumumab have emerged, and especially, combination of mAbs plus novel agents has led to dramatic improvements in the outcome of MM patients. The field of immune therapies has been accelerating in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has also taken center stage in MM. This review focuses on an overview of current status of novel MoAb therapy including bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) antibody (BsAb), antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, in relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM). Lastly, investigational novel MoAb-based therapy to overcome immunotherapy resistance in MM is shown.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3106
Author(s):  
Francesca Bonello ◽  
Mario Boccadoro ◽  
Alessandra Larocca

Multiple myeloma (MM) mostly affects elderly patients, which represent a highly heterogeneous population. Indeed, comorbidities, frailty status and functional reserve may vary considerably among patients with similar chronological age. For this reason, the choice of treatment goals and intensity is particularly challenging in elderly patients, and it requires a multidimensional evaluation of the patients and the disease. In recent years, different tools to detect patient frailty have been developed, and the International Myeloma Working Group frailty score currently represents the gold standard. It identifies intermediate-fit and frail patients requiring gentler treatment approaches compared to fit patients, aiming to preserve quality of life and prevent toxicities. This subset of patients is underrepresented in clinical trials, and studies exploring frailty-adapted approaches are scarce, making the choice of therapy extremely challenging. Treatment options for intermediate-fit and frail patients might include dose-adapted combinations, doublets, and less toxic combinations based on novel agents. This review analyzes the available tools for the assessment of frailty and possible strategies to improve the discriminative power of the scores and expand their use in real-life and clinical trial settings. Moreover, it addresses the main therapeutic challenges in the management of intermediate-fit and frail MM patients at diagnosis and at relapse.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 877-877
Author(s):  
Yu-Tzu Tai ◽  
Chirag Acharya ◽  
Mike Y Zhong ◽  
Michele Cea ◽  
Antonia Cagnetta ◽  
...  

Abstract B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), which is highly expressed on malignant plasma cells in human multiple myeloma (MM), has not been effectively targeted with therapeutic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs). We here investigated the anti-MM activity of J6M0-mcMMAF (GSK2857916), a humanized and afucosylated anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) via uncleavable linker. This novel antagonist anti-BCMA antibody shows binding against all CD138-expressing MM cell lines (n=13) and patient MM cells (n=18), confirming universal BCMA expression on the surface of myeloma cells. Real-time qRT-PCR also showed significantly upregulated BCMA mRNA in CD138+ cells purified from MM patients vs. normal donors (p < 0.03). In contrast, BCMA is undetectable in CD138-negative cells from MM patients (n=3). J6M0-mcMMAF strongly blocks cell growth and induces caspase 3-dependent apoptosis in both drug-sensitive and -resistant MM cell lines and patient CD138+ MM cells, alone and in co-culture with BMSCs. In contrast, an isotype control antibody-drug conjugate (iso-mcMMAF) had no effect on viability of ANBL6 MM cells, alone or cocultured with BMSC. J6M0-mcMMAF specifically induces cell death in CD138-positive patient MM cells but not CD138-negative cells, demonstrating the minimal bystander killing against surrounding BCMA-negative cells. J6M0-mcMMAF completely blocks colony formation of MM cell lines (n=6) via induction of G2/M arrest, followed by apoptosis. This ADC does not affect viability of BCMA-negative NK, PBMC, and BMSCs, cultured alone or together, confirming its specific targeting of BCMA-positive MM cells. J6M0-mcMMAF, which has enhanced Fc-receptor binding due to afucosylation, significantly improved autologous antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) potency and maximum MM cell lysis against MM patient cells (n=5), when compared to J6M0 with normal Fc. Such augmented ADCC and maximum patient MM cell lysis by J6M0-mcMMAFis more pronounced in the autologous setting vs. the allogenic setting where MM cells and healthy donor effectors were used. Pretreatment of PBMC effector cells with lenalidomide further increased J6M0-mcMMAF-induced ADCC against MM cells in the presence or absence of BMSC. The in vivo efficacy of J6M0-mcMMAF was evaluated in murine subcutaneous xenograft models using NCI-H929 and OPM2 cells, as well as in NK-deficient SCID-beige mice with diffuse human MM bone lesions using MM1Sluc cells. Administration of J6M0-mcMMAF at 4 mg/kg (q3d x 4, ip) completely eliminated NCI-H929 and OPM2 xenograft tumors in all mice which remained tumor-free until the termination of studies at 60 and 100 days, respectively. In the MM1Sluc bone marrow dissemination model, J6M0-mcMMAF eradicates detectable tumors after 2 doses at 0.4 mg/kg (q3d x 9, ip), which resulted in extended survival (p<0.0001) and no weight loss of mice following 120 days. J6M0 treatment, although less effective than J6M0-mcMMAF, also had significantly prolonged survival (p<0.03) and diminished tumor burden when compared with control vehicle and isotype-treated groups, indicating a potential role of macrophage-mediated phagocytosis. Indeed, J6M0-mcMMAF recruits macrophage and mediates phagocytosis of target MM cells. Taken together, our studies show that J6M0-mcMMAF potently and selectively induce direct and indirect killing of MM tumor cells both in vitro and in vivo, providing a very promising next-generation immunotherapeutic in this cancer. Disclosures: Tai: Onyx: Consultancy. Mayes:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Craigen:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Gliddon:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Smothers:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Richardson:Millenium: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. Munshi:Celgene: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy. Anderson:celgene: Consultancy; onyx: Consultancy; gilead: Consultancy; sanofi aventis: Consultancy; oncopep: Equity Ownership; acetylon: Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 125 (20) ◽  
pp. 3069-3075 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Vincent Rajkumar ◽  
Ola Landgren ◽  
María-Victoria Mateos

AbstractSmoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic clonal plasma cell disorder. SMM is distinguished from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance by a much higher risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). There have been major advances in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of SMM in the last few years. These include a revised disease definition, identification of several new prognostic factors, a classification based on underlying cytogenetic changes, and new treatment options. Importantly, a subset of patients previously considered SMM is now reclassified as MM on the basis of biomarkers identifying patients with an ≥80% risk of progression within 2 years. SMM has assumed greater significance on the basis of recent trials showing that early therapy can be potentially beneficial to patients. As a result, there is a need to accurately diagnose and risk-stratify patients with SMM, including routine incorporation of modern imaging and laboratory techniques. In this review, we outline current concepts in diagnosis and risk stratification of SMM, and provide specific recommendations on the management of SMM.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gergely Varga ◽  
András Dávid Tóth ◽  
Virág Réka Szita ◽  
Zoltán Csukly ◽  
Apor Hardi ◽  
...  

In Hungary, the cost of lenalidomide-based therapy is covered only for relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) patients, therefore lenalidomide is typically used in the second-line either as part of a triplet with proteasome inhibitors or as a doublet. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone is a standard treatment approach for relapsed/refractory MM, and according to recent large randomized clinical trials (RCT, the standard arm of POLLUX, ASPIRE, TOURMALINE), the progression-free survival (PFS) is expected to be approximately 18 months. We surveyed ten Hungarian centers treating MM and collected data of 278 patients treated predominantly after 2016. The median age was 65 years, and patients were distributed roughly equally over the 3 international staging system groups, but patients with high risk cytogenetics were underrepresented. 15.8% of the patients reached complete response, 21.6% very good partial response, 40.6% partial response, 10.8% stable disease, and 2.5% progressed on treatment. The median PFS was unexpectedly long, 24 months, however only 9 months in those with high risk cytogenetics. We found interesting differences between centers regarding corticosteroid type (prednisolone, methylprednisolone or dexamethasone) and dosing, and also regarding the choice of anticoagulation, but the outcome of the various centers were not different. Although the higher equivalent steroid dose resulted in more complete responses, the median PFS of those having lower corticosteroid dose and methylprednisolone were not inferior compared to the ones with higher dose dexamethasone. On multivariate analysis high risk cytogenetics and the number of prior lines remained significant independent prognostic factors regarding PFS (p &lt; 0.001 and p = 0.005). Our results show that in well-selected patients Lenalidomide-dexamethasone can be a very effective treatment with real-world results that may even outperform those reported in the recent RCTs. This real world information may be more valuable than outdated RCT data when treatment options are discussed with patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document