scholarly journals Clinical Characteristics and In-Hospital Outcomes of Varying Definitions of Minor Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yunyun Xiong ◽  
Hongqiu Gu ◽  
Xing-Quan Zhao ◽  
Xin Yang ◽  
Chunjuan Wang ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: A variety of definitions for minor stroke have been proposed. We aimed to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes of minor stroke defined as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score ≤5 versus ≤3. Methods: We retrieved acute ischemic stroke patients with NIHSS score ≤5 in the CSCA study (China Stroke Center Alliance) between August 2015 and 2019. In-hospital clinical outcomes including all-cause mortality, stroke, and myocardial infarction were compared between the NIHSS score ≤5 and NIHSS score ≤3 groups using absolute standardized differences (ASD). Results: A total of 1 006 798 patients were registered in the CSCA program from 1476 hospitals, 472 352 patients had NIHSS score ≤5, of whom 356 314 patients had NIHSS score ≤3. The in-hospital composite events of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrent stroke were not significantly different between the NIHSS score ≤5 and NIHSS score ≤3 groups (5.6% [26 346/472 352] versus 5.2% [18 682/356 314]; ASD, 1.8). The in-hospital all-cause mortality (0.1% [443/472 352] versus 0.1% [255/356 314]; ASD, <0.01), recurrent ischemic stroke (5.3% [25 026/472 352] versus 5.0% [17 777/356 314]; ASD, 1.4), and hemorrhagic stroke (0.5% [2151/472 352] versus 0.4% [1475/356 314]; ASD, 1.5) were not significantly different between both the NIHSS score ≤5 and NIHSS score ≤3 groups. Conclusions: Our large-scale study identified that minor stroke using NIHSS scores ≤5 and ≤3 as the definition was comparable with each other regarding in-hospital all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. This observation may be useful for future comparison studies and clinical trial design.

Stroke ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (12) ◽  
pp. 3503-3511 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung Min Kim ◽  
Jin-Man Jung ◽  
Bum Joon Kim ◽  
Ji-Sung Lee ◽  
Sun U. Kwon

Background and Purpose— We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the efficacy and safety of cilostazol as a mono or combination (plus aspirin or clopidogrel) treatments compared to conventional single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT, mainly aspirin) for secondary stroke prevention. Methods— Randomized controlled trial studies were searched across multiple comprehensive databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) for review. The primary outcome was recurrent stroke comprising ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. Secondary outcomes included ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, myocardial infarction, and composite outcomes. We performed an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the identified reports, including 2 recently published randomized controlled trials. In addition, network meta-analysis was performed to compare the relative effects of mono versus combination cilostazol treatments. Results— Ten studies were included in this review, 5 of which were assigned to the cilostazol mono group (n=5429) and the other 5 to the combination group (n=2456). The relative risks of recurrent stroke, ischemic stroke, and composite outcomes with cilostazol mono as well as combination treatments were significantly lower than with SAPT without any significant heterogeneity. An indirect comparison of these 3 outcomes revealed the cilostazol combination approach to be superior. The cilostazol mono treatment diminished hemorrhagic stroke more significantly than SAPT and the cilostazol combination did not increase hemorrhagic stroke compared to SAPT. The outcomes from the 2 cilostazol regimens were comparable to SAPT in the case of myocardial infarction. Conclusions— Cilostazol is a more effective and safer treatment option than SAPT approaches using mainly aspirin. Cilostazol regimens can also be modified to clinical situations as this drug reduces recurrent and ischemic stroke more efficiently as a combination therapy but is more beneficial for hemorrhagic stroke as a monotherapy.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Joon-tae Kim ◽  
Hee-Joon Bae ◽  

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and large artery diseases (LAD) share several risk factors and often coexist in the same patient. Optimal treatments for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with concomitant AF and LAD have not been extensively studied so far. Objective: This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the addition of antiplatelet (AP) to oral anticoagulant (OAC) with that of OAC alone in AIS with AF according to the LAD. Methods: Using a multicenter stroke registry, acute (within 48h of onset) and mild-to-moderate (NIHSS score ≤15) stroke patients with AF were identified. Propensity scores using IPTW were used to adjust baseline imbalances between the OAC+AP group and the OAC alone group in all patients and in each subgroup by LAD. The primary outcome was major vascular events, defined as the composite of recurrent stroke, MI, and all-cause mortality at up to 3 months after index stroke. Results: Among the 5469 patients (age, 72±10yrs; male, 54.9%; initial NIHSS score, 4 [2-9]), 79.0% (n=4323) received OAC alone, and 21.0% (n=1146) received OAC+AP. By weighted Cox proportional hazards analysis, a tendency of increasing the risk of 3-months primary composite events in the OAC+AP group vs the OAC alone (HR 1.36 [0.99-1.87], p=0.06), with significant interaction with treatments and LAD (Pint=0.048). Briefly, among patients with moderate-to-severe large artery stenosis, tendency of decrease in 3-months primary composite events of the OAC+AP group, compared with OAC alone group, was observed (HR 0.54 [0.17-1.70]), whereas among patients with complete occlusion, the OAC+AP group markedly increased the risk of 3-months composite events (HR 2.00 [1.27-3.15]), compared with the OAC alone group. No interaction between direct oral anticoagulant and warfarin on outcome was observed (Pint=0.35). Conclusion: In conclusion, treatment with addition of AP to OAC had a tendency to increase the risk of 3-months vascular events, compared with OAC alone in AIS with AF. However, the effects of antithrombotic treatment could be modified according to the LAD, with substantial benefits of OAC alone in subgroup of large artery occlusion. Our results address the need for the further study to tailor the optimal treatment in AIS with concomitant AF and LAD.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 49
Author(s):  
Hijriyah Putri Tarmizi Hasibuan ◽  
Isra Thristy

Background: Stroke is the second largest cause of death in the world. Stroke is classified based on its etiology as ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke. Most large-scale studies on the risk of total cholesterol and triglyceride levels in stroke are not distinguished between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. Purposes: The purpose of this study was to determine the comparison of triglyceride and total cholesterol levels in ischemic stroke patients with hemorrhagic stroke. Method: Descriptive analytic study using medical records of patients at Medan Haji General Hospital in 2018-2019. The number of ischemic stroke patients is 28 patients and hemorrhagic stroke 28 patients with a total sample of 56 patients. Results: In ischemic stroke patients, the average value of triglyceride levels was 144.75 mg/dL and the average value of total cholesterol was 250.93 mg/dL. In hemorrhagic stroke patients, the average value of triglyceride levels is 126.93 mg/dL and the average total cholesterol level is 174.25 mg/dL. Conclusion: From this study we found a significant difference in total cholesterol between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes. No significant difference was found in triglycerides between ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brett L Cucchiara ◽  
Jordan Elm ◽  
J Donald Easton ◽  
Shelagh Coutts ◽  
Joshua Willey ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: To assess the effect of combination antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel versus aspirin alone on disability following TIA or minor stroke and to identify factors associated with disability. Methods: The POINT trial randomized patients with TIA or minor stroke (NIHSS≤3) within 12 hours of onset to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus clopidogrel versus aspirin alone. The primary outcome measure was a composite of stroke, MI, or vascular death. We performed a post-hoc exploratory analysis to examine the effect of treatment on overall disability (defined as mRS>1) at 90 days as well as disability ascribed by the local investigator to index or recurrent stroke. We also evaluated predictors of disability. Results: At 90 days, 188/1964 (9.6%) of patients enrolled with TIA and 471/2586 (18.2%) of those enrolled with stroke were disabled. Overall disability was similar between patients assigned DAPT versus aspirin alone (14.7% vs. 14.3%, OR 0.97, 95%CI 0.82-1.14, p=0.69). However, there were numerically fewer patients with disability in conjunction with a primary outcome event in the DAPT arm (3.0% vs. 4.0%, OR 0.73, 95%CI 0.53-1.01, p=0.06), and significantly fewer patients in the DAPT arm with disability attributed by the investigators to either the index event or recurrent stroke (5.9% vs. 7.4%, OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62-0.99, p=0.04). Notably, disability attributed to the index event accounted for the majority of this difference (4.5% vs. 6.0%, OR 0.74 95% CI 0.57-0.96, p=0.02). In multivariate analysis of patients enrolled with TIA, disability was significantly associated with age, subsequent ischemic stroke, serious adverse events, and major bleeding. In patients enrolled with stroke, disability was associated with female sex, hypertension, diabetes, NIHSS score, recurrent ischemic stroke, subsequent myocardial infarction, and serious adverse events. Conclusions: In addition to reducing recurrent stroke in patients with acute minor stroke and TIA, dual antiplatelet therapy might reduce stroke-related disability.


Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shyam Prabhakaran ◽  
Rajbeer Sangha ◽  
Sameer Ansari ◽  
Jose Romano ◽  
PN Sylaja ◽  
...  

Introduction: Despite aggressive medical management, patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) remain at high risk for recurrent stroke. There are no reliable biomarkers to identify those at highest risk and in whom flow restorative procedures may be warranted. We hypothesized that a borderzone infarct pattern would predict 90-day recurrent stroke in the territory of symptomatic ICAD. Methods: Using the prospective registry at a single center, we identified consecutive patients admitted between 2012 and 2017 with confirmed ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and independently adjudicated symptomatic ICAD with stenosis of >50%. We ascertained clinical events within 3 months of index stroke through telephone interview. Ischemic stroke in the territory of the symptomatic stenotic artery was the primary outcome. A blinded rater assessed infarct pattern: single perforator, territorial, borderzone, or mixed. We evaluated whether infarct pattern was a predictor of recurrent stroke using logistic regression adjusting for age, sex, prior stroke, initial NIHSS score, location of stenosis, degree of stenosis, and use of dual antiplatelet therapy at discharge. Results: Among 212 patients who met study criteria, the mean age was 68.2 (±12.2) years and median initial NIHSS score was 3 (interquartile range 1-6). Symptomatic ICAD was localized to the anterior circulation in 132 (64.2%) patients and 171 (80.7%) had stenosis >70%. Isolated borderzone infarcts were noted in 18 patients (8.5%) while they were present in 34 (16.0%) other patients with mixed pattern. At 3 months, 51 (24.1%) patients experienced recurrent stroke in the territory. Among patients with any borderzone infarct, 20 (38.7%) had recurrent stroke versus 31 (19.4%) in patients with other patterns (p=0.005). In adjusted analysis, presence of any borderzone infarct was independently associated with recurrent stroke (aOR 2.59, 95% CI 1.23-5.48, p=0.012). Conclusions: In a single-center observational cohort study, we found that a borderzone infarct pattern was a strong predictor of recurrent stroke at 3 months in patients with symptomatic ICAD. Our data suggest that hypoperfusion may be an important mechanism of recurrent stroke in this population.


Stroke ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 46 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meng Lee ◽  
Yi-Ling Wu ◽  
Jeffrey L Saver ◽  
Jiann-Der Lee ◽  
Hui-Hsuan Wang ◽  
...  

Background: The efficacy of statin therapy in the prevention of recurrent stroke and major adverse cardiovascularevents (MACE) was clearly established by the SPARCL trial; but SPARCL excluded patients whose index stroke was due to a presumed cardioembolic mechanism. As such, it remains unclear whether statins are beneficial in cardioembolic stroke patients, particularly those with atrial fibrillation (AF). Objective: To evaluate the relationship between statin use and future vascular risk reduction among recent ischemic stroke patients with AF Methods: We analyzed the Taiwan National Health Insurance registry which comprises beneficiaries aged ≥ 18 years. Code ICD-9 was used to identify a primary hospitalization diagnosis of ischemic stroke and AF among subjects encountered between 2003 and 2009. Follow-up was from time of the index stroke to admission for recurrent stroke or myocardial infarction; withdrawal from the registry; and last medical claim before 1/1/2011. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether statin was prescribed (at least 30 days vs. never used) during the follow-up period. Patients were excluded if they did not take any antithrombotic agent within 30 days before an endpoint. Primary endpoint was MACE (composite of stroke and myocardial infarction) and a key secondary endpoint was any recurrent stroke. Multivariate-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for the development of events were estimated using Cox models. Model was adjusted for baseline age, gender, hypertension, diabetes, prior stroke, prior myocardial infarction, hyperlipidemia, hospital level, and antithrombotic agent during follow-up. Results: Among 4455 eligible patients, mean age was 71 years and mean follow-up duration was 2.8 years.Compared to non-statin use, statin use was associated with a significantly lower occurrence of MACE (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.99, P=0.04) and recurrent stroke (adjusted HR 0.82, 0.69 to 0.97, P=0.02). Statin use was also linked to lower ischemic stroke risk, but had neutral effects on intracranial hemorrhage and myocardial infarction. Conclusion: Among patients with an index ischemic stroke and AF, statin use is associated with a lower risk of recurrent vascular events including stroke.


Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
xiaoqing bu ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Hao Peng ◽  
Jing Chen ◽  
...  

Introduction: The relationship between estimated-glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and acute ischemic stroke outcomes remains controversial. Hypothesis: We aimed to evaluate the impact of eGFR on all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, and vascular events in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods: 4036 patients with acute ischemic stroke recruited from 26 hospitals across China from August 2009 to May 2013 were included in our study. GFR was estimated by CKD-EPI equations based on serum creatinine and/or cystatin C (CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys, and CKD-EPIcr-cys). The Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the relationship between declined eGFR and 1-year all-cause mortality, recurrent stroke, and vascular events. Declined eGFR was defined as <60 mL/min /1.73 m2. Results: Declined eGFR was present in 7.22% (n=281) of patients based on the CKD-EPIcr equation, 3.43% (n=119) based on the CKD-EPIcys equation, and 5.67% (n=170) based on the CKD-EPIcr-cys equation. Compared to patients with an eGFR ≥90 mL/min /1.73 m2, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for all-cause mortality associated with eGFR<60 mL/min /1.73 m2 were 1.68 (1.06 to 2.66, p=0.026), 2.29 (1.29 to 4.06, p=0.005), and 1.79 (1.08 to 2.98, p=0.024) using CKD-EPIcr, CKD-EPIcys, and CKD-EPIcr-cys equations, respectively. For recurrent stroke, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 0.90 (0.49 to 1.66, p=0.743), 0.60 (0.19 to 1.93, p=0.393), and 0.89 (0.40 to 1.95, p=0.762), respectively. For vascular events, adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.33 (0.81 to 2.19, p=0.266), 1.07 (0.46 to 2.47, p=0.880), and 1.31 (0.70 to 2.43, p=0.403), respectively. Conclusion: Our study indicates that declined eGFR is a strong independent risk factor for total mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, there is no association between low eGFR and recurrent stroke or vascular events among patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, the association of eGFR with all-cause mortality among patients with acute ischemic stroke is stronger when eGFR was calculated based on the CKD-EPIcys equation compared to CKD-EPIcr and CKD-EPIcr-cys equations.


Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sungwook Yu ◽  
YooHwan Kim ◽  
Kyung-Hee Cho ◽  
Byung-Jo Kim

Introduction: Minor stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) is considered to have little effect on autonomic functions. However, it is unclear whether autonomic dysfunction in patients with minor stroke develops during acute stroke phase. Hypothesis: We evaluated whether patients with minor stroke had autonomic dysfunction during acute stroke phase. Methods: Patients with ischemic stroke or TIA were included. Those with diabetes and urological problems were excluded. Quantitative sudomotor axon reflex test (QSART), head-up tilt test (HUTT), sympathetic skin response (SSR), and heart rate variability (HRV) were performed during admission after acute stroke onset. HRV frequency measurements included time-domain and frequency-domain parameters. We analyzed the difference of autonomic function among patients with minor stroke (NIHSS score ≤ 3), major stroke (NIHSS score≥3) and TIA. Results: Total of 81 patients was included. There were 55 with minor ischemic stroke, 15 with major ischemic stroke, and 11 with TIA. RR interval of HRV was significantly different among three groups (938.8 ± 99.1 ms in TIA, 871.4 ± 104.9 ms in minor stroke, and 832.7 ± 107.8 ms in major stroke, P = 0.042). Parameters of HRV in patients with stroke had significantly lower compared to those with TIA [high frequency (HF) 8.9 ± 3.6 ms2 vs 12.2 ± 5.0 ms2, respectively, P = 0.013; the square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent NN intervals (RMSSD), 23.5 ± 9.3 ms vs 30.7 ± 11.6 ms, respectively, P = 0.023]. Moreover, HF and RMSSD significantly decreased in patients with minor stroke compared to those with TIA (HF, 8.9 ± 3.6 ms2 vs 12.2 ± 5.0 ms2, respectively, P = 0.038; RMSSD, 23.2 ± 9.4 ms vs 30.7 ± 11.6 ms, respectively, P = 0.05). Results of QSART, HUTT and SSR were not different among three groups. Conclusion: Patients with minor stroke had decreased HRV compared to those with TIA, indicating that even minor stroke could be associated with decreased parasympathetic activity at early stroke phase. Further studies will be needed to evaluate effects of autonomic dysfunction on clinical outcome in patients with minor stroke.


Author(s):  
Michael P Thompson ◽  
Zhehui Luo ◽  
Joseph Gardiner ◽  
James F Burke ◽  
Mathew J Reeves

Objective: Complete documentation in large scale datasets such as administrative data or disease registries is often difficult. Given that the subset of patients with complete data documentation are most likely not a random sample of patients, selection bias threatens the validity of results if a complete case analysis is used. To demonstrate, we will assess the presence and magnitude of selection bias in ischemic stroke patients with documented National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] which is often incomplete [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] using the Heckman Selection Model. Methods: Patient level variables including demographics, comorbidities, clinical EMS and admission variables, and medical history/comorbidities were obtained from 10,717 ischemic stroke patients aged 65 and older in the Michigan Stroke Registry in 2009-2012. The Heckman Selection Model assesses the presence and magnitude of selection bias by estimating a correlation coefficient between error components of a linear regression model predicting patient NIHSS score [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] the outcome model [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] and a binary probit model predicting NIHSS documentation [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] the selection model [[Unable to Display Character: &#8211;]] conditional on patient and hospital predictors. The outcome model predicting NIHSS score was specified using a backward selection process with stepwise deletion of non-significant predictors. The selection model included all variables in the outcome model, plus additional significant predictors of NIHHS documentation. Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation was used to produce robust standard errors. All analyses were done using PROC QLIM procedure in SAS. Results: 7,956 cases (74.2%) of cases had NIHSS documented. Significant predictors in the outcome and selection models are shown in the Table. The Heckman Selection Model found a statistically significant but modest correlation coefficient of ρ =0.1089 (SE=0.0119, p<0.0001). The positive correlation indicates that NIHSS was more likely to be documented in patients with higher NIHSS scores, i.e., more severe strokes. Conclusions: We found statistically significant albeit weak selection bias in the documentation of NIHSS in stroke patients. The Heckman Selection Model is a novel method that can be used to assess the presence and magnitude of selection bias when missing data is common.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M V Fangel ◽  
P B Nielsen ◽  
J K Kristensen ◽  
T B Larsen ◽  
T F Overvad ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Risk stratification in patients with type 2 diabetes continues to be an important priority in the management of diabetes-related morbidity and mortality. International guidelines generally recognize patients with diabetes and cardiovascular disease as high-risk patients. Risk stratification is, however, more uncertain in diabetes patients without cardiovascular disease. Micro- and macroalbuminuria have previously been identified as predictors of cardiovascular events and mortality in general cohorts of diabetes patients. However, less is known about the predictive value of albuminuria in patients with diabetes but without established cardiovascular disease. Purpose We aimed to examine the association between albuminuria level and the risk of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes and without a diagnosis of cardiovascular disease. Methods We linked Danish nationwide registries to identify patients with type 2 diabetes and without cardiovascular disease from May 2005 through June 2015. Based on two consecutive measurements of the urinary albumin excretion rate or albumin-to-creatinine ratio patients were stratified in categories of normoalbuminuria, microalbuminuria, and macroalbuminuria. Patients were followed for the outcomes ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality until December 31, 2015. Five-year risk of outcomes were presented as cumulative incidence functions (with death as a competing event). Associations between albuminuria level and incidence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality were evaluated with Cox proportional hazard regression adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors. Results The study population included 78,841 patients with type 2 diabetes (44.7% females, mean age 63.2). When comparing patients with microalbuminuria to patients with normoalbuminuria in an age- and sex-adjusted analysis, we found hazard ratios (HRs) of 1.45 (95% CI: 1.24–1.69), 1.45 (95% CI: 1.24–1.70), and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.39–1.61) for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, respectively. Furthermore, macroalbuminuria was associated with HRs of 2.05 (95% CI: 1.70–2.48), 2.25 (95% CI: 1.86–2.71), and 2.03 (95% CI: 1.85–2.23) for ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality, respectively. Similar results were found after adjusting for cardiovascular risk factors. Conclusions In this nationwide cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes but without cardiovascular disease, patients with micro- and macroalbuminuria had a higher risk of incident ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. This finding supports that patients with micro- or macroalbuminuria should be screened regularly and followed closely in clinical practice. Moreover, these findings suggest that patients with type 2 diabetes and micro- or macroalbuminuria may benefit from intensive vascular risk reduction.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document