scholarly journals The Influence of Stratospheric Vortex Displacements and Splits on Surface Climate

2013 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 2668-2682 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel M. Mitchell ◽  
Lesley J. Gray ◽  
James Anstey ◽  
Mark P. Baldwin ◽  
Andrew J. Charlton-Perez
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Time Scales ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Positive Temperature ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Weather Patterns ◽  
Northern Latitudes ◽  
Stratospheric Variability

Abstract A strong link exists between stratospheric variability and anomalous weather patterns at the earth’s surface. Specifically, during extreme variability of the Arctic polar vortex termed a “weak vortex event,” anomalies can descend from the upper stratosphere to the surface on time scales of weeks. Subsequently the outbreak of cold-air events have been noted in high northern latitudes, as well as a quadrupole pattern in surface temperature over the Atlantic and western European sectors, but it is currently not understood why certain events descend to the surface while others do not. This study compares a new classification technique of weak vortex events, based on the distribution of potential vorticity, with that of an existing technique and demonstrates that the subdivision of such events into vortex displacements and vortex splits has important implications for tropospheric weather patterns on weekly to monthly time scales. Using reanalysis data it is found that vortex splitting events are correlated with surface weather and lead to positive temperature anomalies over eastern North America of more than 1.5 K, and negative anomalies over Eurasia of up to −3 K. Associated with this is an increase in high-latitude blocking in both the Atlantic and Pacific sectors and a decrease in European blocking. The corresponding signals are weaker during displacement events, although ultimately they are shown to be related to cold-air outbreaks over North America. Because of the importance of stratosphere–troposphere coupling for seasonal climate predictability, identifying the type of stratospheric variability in order to capture the correct surface response will be necessary.

scholarly journals Analysis of Arctic Spring Ozone Anomaly in the Phases of QBO and 11-year Solar Cycle for 1979–2011

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousuke Yamashita ◽  
Hideharu Akiyoshi ◽  
Masaaki Takahashi
Keyword(s):  
Solar Cycle ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Early Spring ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Negative Anomaly ◽  
Late Winter ◽  
Quasi Biennial Oscillation ◽  
Biennial Oscillation

Arctic ozone amount in winter to spring shows large year-to-year variation. This study investigates Arctic spring ozone in relation to the phase of quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO)/the 11-year solar cycle, using satellite observations, reanalysis data, and outputs of a chemistry climate model (CCM) during the period of 1979–2011. For this duration, we found that the composite mean of the Northern Hemisphere high-latitude total ozone in the QBO-westerly (QBO-W)/solar minimum (Smin) phase is slightly smaller than those averaged for the QBO-W/Smax and QBO-E/Smax years in March. An analysis of a passive ozone tracer in the CCM simulation indicates that this negative anomaly is primarily caused by transport. The negative anomaly is consistent with a weakening of the residual mean downward motion in the polar lower stratosphere. The contribution of chemical processes estimated using the column amount difference between ozone and the passive ozone tracer is between 10–20% of the total anomaly in March. The lower ozone levels in the Arctic spring during the QBO-W/Smin years are associated with a stronger Arctic polar vortex from late winter to early spring, which is linked to the reduced occurrence of sudden stratospheric warming in the winter during the QBO-W/Smin years.

scholarly journals Analyzing ozone variations and uncertainties at high latitudes during Sudden Stratospheric Warming events using MERRA-2

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shima Bahramvash Shams ◽  
Von P. Walden ◽  
James W. Hannigan ◽  
William J. Randel ◽  
Irina V. Petropavlovskikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stratospheric Ozone ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Sudden Stratospheric Warming ◽  
Total Column Ozone ◽  
Northern Latitudes ◽  
Stratospheric Dynamics ◽  
Zonal Average

Abstract. Stratospheric circulation is a critical part of the Arctic ozone cycle. Sudden stratospheric warming events (SSWs) manifest the strongest alteration of stratospheric dynamics. Changes in planetary wave propagation vigorously influence zonal mean zonal wind, temperature, and tracer concentrations in the stratosphere over the high latitudes. In this study, we examine six major SSWs from 2004 to 2020 using the Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Applications, Version 2 (MERRA-2). Using the unique density of observations around the Greenland sector at high latitudes, we perform comprehensive comparisons of high latitude observations with the MERRA-2 ozone dataset during the six major SSWs. Our results show that MERRA-2 captures the high variability of mid stratospheric ozone fluctuations during SSWs over high latitudes. However, larger uncertainties are observed in the lower stratosphere and troposphere. The zonally averaged stratospheric ozone shows a dramatic increase of 9–29 % in total column ozone (TCO) near the time of each SSW, which lasts up to two months. The SSWs exhibit a more significant impact on ozone over high northern latitudes when the polar vortex is mostly elongated as seen in 2009 and 2018 compared to the events in which the polar vortex is displaced towards Europe. The regional impact of SSWs over Greenland has a similar structure as the zonal average, however, exhibits more intense ozone anomalies which is reflected by 15–37 % increase in TCO. The influence of SSW on mid stratospheric ozone levels persists longer than their impact on temperature. This paper is focused on the increased (suppressed) wave activity before (after) the SSWs and their impact on ozone variability at high latitudes. This includes an investigation of the different terms of tracer continuity using MERRA-2 parameters, which emphasizes the key role of vertical advection on mid-stratospheric ozone during the SSWs.

scholarly journals Atmospheric teleconnections between the Arctic and the eastern Baltic Sea regions

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 1019-1030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liisi Jakobson ◽  
Erko Jakobson ◽  
Piia Post ◽  
Jaak Jaagus
Keyword(s):  
Baltic Sea ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Specific Humidity ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Positive Temperature ◽  
Strong Negative Correlation ◽  
Mild Winter ◽  
Baltic Sea Region ◽  
The Arctic Oscillation ◽  
Eastern Baltic

Abstract. The teleconnections between meteorological parameters of the Arctic and the eastern Baltic Sea regions were analysed based on the NCEP-CFSR and ERA-Interim reanalysis data for 1979–2015. The eastern Baltic Sea region was characterised by meteorological values at a testing point (TP) in southern Estonia (58° N, 26° E). Temperature at the 1000 hPa level at the TP have a strong negative correlation with the Greenland sector (the region between 55–80° N and 20–80° W) during all seasons except summer. Significant teleconnections are present in temperature profiles from 1000 to 500 hPa. The strongest teleconnections between the same parameter at the eastern Baltic Sea region and the Arctic are found in winter, but they are clearly affected by the Arctic Oscillation (AO) index. After removal of the AO index variability, correlations in winter were below ±0.5, while in other seasons there remained regions with strong (|R| > 0.5, p < 0.002) correlations. Strong correlations (|R| > 0.5) are also present between different climate variables (sea-level pressure, specific humidity, wind speed) at the TP and different regions of the Arctic. These teleconnections cannot be explained solely with the variability of circulation indices. The positive temperature anomaly of mild winter at the Greenland sector shifts towards east during the next seasons, reaching the Baltic Sea region in summer. This evolution is present at 60 and 65° N but is missing at higher latitudes. The most permanent lagged correlations in 1000 hPa temperature reveal that the temperature in summer at the TP is strongly predestined by temperature in the Greenland sector in the previous spring and winter.

scholarly journals Arctic hydroclimate variability during the last 2000 years – current understanding and research challenges

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans W. Linderholm ◽  
Marie Nicolle ◽  
Pierre Francus ◽  
Konrad Gajewski ◽  
Samuli Helama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Ice Age ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Oceanic Circulation ◽  
Natural Ecosystems ◽  
Temperature And Precipitation ◽  
Hydroclimate Variability

Abstract. Along with Arctic amplification, changes in Arctic hydroclimate have become increasingly apparent. Reanalysis data show increasing trends in Arctic temperature and precipitation over the 20th century, but changes are not homogenous across seasons or space. The observed hydroclimate changes are expected to continue, and possibly accelerate, in the coming century, not only affecting pan-Arctic natural ecosystems and human activities, but also lower latitudes through changes in atmospheric and oceanic circulation. However, a lack of spatiotemporal observational data makes reliable quantification of Arctic hydroclimate change difficult, especially in a long-term context. To understand hydroclimate variability and the mechanisms driving observed changes, beyond the instrumental record, climate proxies are needed. Here we bring together the current understanding of Arctic hydroclimate during the past 2000 years, as inferred from natural archives and proxies and palaeoclimate model simulations. Inadequate proxy data coverage is apparent, with distinct data gaps in most of Eurasia and parts of North America, which makes robust assessments for the whole Arctic currently impossible. Hydroclimate proxies and climate models indicate that the Medieval Climate Anomaly (MCA) was anomalously wet, while conditions were in general drier during the Little Ice Age (LIA), relative to the last 2000 years. However, it is clear that there are large regional differences, which are especially evident during the LIA. Due to the spatiotemporal differences in Arctic hydroclimate, we recommend detailed regional studies, e.g. including field reconstructions, to disentangle spatial patterns and potential forcing factors. At present, it is only possible to carry out regional syntheses for a few areas of the Arctic, e.g. Fennoscandia, Greenland and western North America. To fully assess pan-Arctic hydroclimate variability for the last two millennia additional proxy records are required.

scholarly journals Dynamical and chemical processes contributing to ozone loss in exceptional Arctic stratosphere winter-spring of 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergei P. Smyshlyaev ◽  
Pavel N. Vargin ◽  
Alexander N. Lukyanov ◽  
Natalia D. Tsvetkova ◽  
Maxim A. Motsakov
Keyword(s):  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Chemical Processes ◽  
Western Hemisphere ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Spring Season ◽  
Dynamical Processes ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Ozone Loss ◽  
Eastern Hemisphere

Abstract. The features of dynamical processes and changes in the ozone layer in the Arctic stratosphere during the winter-spring season 2019–2020 are analyzed using ozonesondes, reanalysis data and numerical experiments with a chemistry-transport model (CTM). Using the trajectory model of the Central Aerological Observatory (TRACAO) and the ERA5 reanalysis ozone mixing ratio data, a comparative analysis of the evolution of stratospheric ozone averaged along the trajectories in the winter-spring seasons of 2010–2011, 2015–2016, and 2019–2020 was carried out, which demonstrated that the largest ozone loss at altitudes of 18–20 km within stratospheric polar vortex in the Arctic in winter-spring 2019–2020 exceeded the corresponding values of the other two winter-spring seasons 2010–2011 and 2015–2016 with the largest decrease in ozone content in recent year. The total decrease in the column ozone inside the stratospheric polar vortex, calculated using the vertical ozone profiles obtained based on the ozonesondes data, in the 2019–2020 winter-spring season was more than 150 Dobson Units, which repeated the record depletion for the 2010–2011 winter-spring season. At the same time, the maximum ozone loss in winter 2019–2020 was observed at lower levels than in 2010–2011, which is consistent with the results of trajectory analysis and the results of other authors. The results of numerical calculations with the CTM with dynamical parameters specified from the MERRA-2 reanalysis data, carried out according to several scenarios of accounting for the chemical destruction of ozone, indicated that both dynamical and chemical processes make contributions to ozone loss inside the polar vortex. In this case, dynamical processes predominate in the western hemisphere, while in the eastern hemisphere chemical processes make an almost equal contribution with dynamical factors, and the chemical depletion of ozone is determined not only by heterogeneous processes on the surface of the polar stratospheric clouds, but by the gas-phase destruction in nitrogen catalytic cycles as well.

scholarly journals Impact of Reduced Arctic Sea Ice on Northern Hemisphere Climate and Weather in Autumn and Winter

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-61
Author(s):  
Svenya Chripko ◽  
Rym Msadek ◽  
Emilia Sanchez-Gomez ◽  
Laurent Terray ◽  
Laurent Bessières ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Central Asia ◽  
Northern Hemisphere ◽  
Climate Model ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Arctic Sea Ice ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Arctic Sea ◽  
Autumn And Winter

AbstractThe Northern Hemisphere transient atmospheric response to Arctic sea decline is investigated in autumn and winter, using sensitivity experiments performed with the CNRMCM6-1 high-top climate model. Arctic sea ice albedo is reduced to the ocean value, yielding ice-free conditions during summer and a more moderate sea ice reduction during the following months. A strong ampli_cation of temperatures over the Arctic is induced by sea ice loss, with values reaching up to 25°C near the surface in autumn. Signi_cant surface temperature anomalies are also found over the mid-latitudes, with a warming reaching 1°C over North America and Europe, and a cooling reaching 1°C over central Asia. Using a dynamical adjustment method based on a regional reconstruction of circulation analogs, we show that the warming over North America and Europe can be explained both by changes in the atmospheric circulation and by the advection of warmer oceanic air by the climatological ow. In contrast, we demonstrate that the sea-ice induced cooling over central Asia is solely due to dynamical changes, involving an intensi_cation of the Siberian High and a cyclonic anomaly over the Sea of Okhotsk. In the troposphere, the abrupt Arctic sea ice decline favours a narrowing of the subtropical jet stream and a slight weakening of the lower part of the polar vortex that is explained by a weak enhancement of upward wave activity toward the stratosphere. We further show that reduced Arctic sea ice in our experiments is mainly associated with less severe cold extremes in the mid-latitudes.

The role of a tropopause polar vortex in the generation of the January 2019 extreme Arctic outbreak

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel P. Lillo ◽  
Steven M. Cavallo ◽  
David B. Parsons ◽  
Christopher Riedel
Keyword(s):  
Great Lakes ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
Direct Consequence ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Middle Latitudes ◽  
Cold Air Outbreak ◽  
Lake Effect ◽  
The Impact

AbstractAn extreme Arctic cold air outbreak took place across the Midwest, Great Lakes, and Northeast during 29 January to 1 February 2019. The event broke numerous long-standing records with wide-reaching and detrimental societal impacts. This study found that this rare and dangerous cold air out-break (CAO) was a direct consequence of a tropopause polar vortex (TPV) originating at high latitudes and subsequently tracking southward into the United States. The tropopause depression at the center of this TPV extended nearly to the surface. Simulations using the atmospheric component of the Model for Prediction Across Scales (MPAS) were conducted revealing excellent predictability at 6-7 days lead times with the strength, timing, and location of the CAO linked to the earlier characteristics of the TPV over the Arctic. Within the middle latitudes, the TPV subsequently developed a tilt with height. Warming and the destruction of potential vorticity also took place as the TPV passed over the Great Lakes initiating a lake effect snow storm. The climatological investigation of CAOs suggests that TPVs frequently play a role in CAOs over North America with a TPV located within 1000 km of a CAO 85% of the time. These TPVs tended to originate in the Northern Canadian Arctic and are ejected equatorward into the Great Lakes/Upper-midwest and then to the northeast over Labrador. This study also provides insight into how the impact of Arctic circulations on middle latitudes may vary within the framework of a rapidly changing Arctic.

scholarly journals Arctic hydroclimate variability during the last 2000 years: current understanding and research challenges

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 473-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans W. Linderholm ◽  
Marie Nicolle ◽  
Pierre Francus ◽  
Konrad Gajewski ◽  
Samuli Helama ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
Regional Differences ◽  
Climate Models ◽  
Reanalysis Data ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Ice Age ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Natural Ecosystems ◽  
Proxy Records ◽  
Hydroclimate Variability

Abstract. Reanalysis data show an increasing trend in Arctic precipitation over the 20th century, but changes are not homogenous across seasons or space. The observed hydroclimate changes are expected to continue and possibly accelerate in the coming century, not only affecting pan-Arctic natural ecosystems and human activities, but also lower latitudes through the atmospheric and ocean circulations. However, a lack of spatiotemporal observational data makes reliable quantification of Arctic hydroclimate change difficult, especially in a long-term context. To understand Arctic hydroclimate and its variability prior to the instrumental record, climate proxy records are needed. The purpose of this review is to summarise the current understanding of Arctic hydroclimate during the past 2000 years. First, the paper reviews the main natural archives and proxies used to infer past hydroclimate variations in this remote region and outlines the difficulty of disentangling the moisture from the temperature signal in these records. Second, a comparison of two sets of hydroclimate records covering the Common Era from two data-rich regions, North America and Fennoscandia, reveals inter- and intra-regional differences. Third, building on earlier work, this paper shows the potential for providing a high-resolution hydroclimate reconstruction for the Arctic and a comparison with last-millennium simulations from fully coupled climate models. In general, hydroclimate proxies and simulations indicate that the Medieval Climate Anomaly tends to have been wetter than the Little Ice Age (LIA), but there are large regional differences. However, the regional coverage of the proxy data is inadequate, with distinct data gaps in most of Eurasia and parts of North America, making robust assessments for the whole Arctic impossible at present. To fully assess pan-Arctic hydroclimate variability for the last 2 millennia, additional proxy records are required.

scholarly journals Preconditioning of Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex Shift Events

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (14) ◽  
pp. 5417-5436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinlong Huang ◽  
Wenshou Tian ◽  
Lesley J. Gray ◽  
Jiankai Zhang ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
North America ◽  
North Atlantic ◽  
Planetary Wave ◽  
Polar Vortex ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Bering Strait ◽  
Surface Cooling ◽  
Stratospheric Polar Vortex ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eastern North Atlantic

Abstract This study examines the preconditioning of events in which the Arctic stratospheric polar vortex shifts toward Eurasia (EUR events), North America (NA events), and the Atlantic (ATL events) using composite analysis. An increase in blocking days over northern Europe and a decrease in blocking days over the Bering Strait favor the movement of the vortex toward Eurasia, while the opposite changes in blocking days over those regions favor the movement of the vortex toward North America. An increase in blocking days over the eastern North Atlantic and a decrease in blocking days over the Bering Strait are conducive to movement of the stratospheric polar vortex toward the Atlantic. These anomalous precursor blocking patterns are interpreted in terms of the anomalous zonal wave-1 or wave-2 planetary wave fluxes into the stratosphere that are known to influence the vortex position and strength. In addition, the polar vortex shift events are further classified into events with small and large polar vortex deformation, since the two types of events are likely to have a different impact at the surface. A significant difference in the zonal wave-2 heat flux into the lower stratosphere exists prior to the two types of events and this is linked to anomalous blocking patterns. This study further defines three types of tropospheric blocking events in which the spatial patterns of blocking frequency anomalies are similar to the blocking patterns prior to EUR, NA, and ATL events, respectively, and our reanalysis reveals that the polar vortex is indeed more likely to shift toward Eurasia, North America, and the Atlantic in the presence of the above three defined tropospheric blocking events. These shifts of the polar vortex toward Eurasia, North America, and the Atlantic lead to statistically significant negative height anomalies near the tropopause and corresponding surface cooling anomalies over these three regions.

scholarly journals Occurrence and mechanisms of extreme winter air temperatures in the Arctic and surrounding continents

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Vihma ◽  
Petteri Uotila ◽  
Tuomas Naakka ◽  
Tiina Nygård
Keyword(s):  
High Pressure ◽  
North America ◽  
Sea Ice ◽  
Central Europe ◽  
Northern China ◽  
The Arctic ◽  
Extreme Weather Events ◽  
Jet Stream ◽  
Cold Air ◽  
Weather Events

&lt;p&gt;The recent rapid warming of the Arctic atmosphere and ocean and related sea ice decline have been associated with increasing occurrence of extreme weather events in the Arctic. Applying ERA-Interim reanalysis, we identify 100 days with largest positive and negative anomalies (compared to local climatology) in 2-m air temperature (T2m) in the Northern Hemisphere in winter during 2005-2019, and address various physical mechanisms contributing to these events. The mechanisms responsible for warm extremes in the Arctic are often associated with a meandering Polar front jet stream, favouring cases of large transports of heat and moisture from mid-latitudes to the Arctic. In addition, subsidence heating often contributes to warm extremes in the Arctic, allowing them to occur also under high-pressure conditions. The coldest T2m anomalies north of 30&lt;sup&gt;o&lt;/sup&gt;N mostly occur in regions that are also climatologically cold, i.e., cannot be strongly affected by cold-air advection. This suggests a dominating role local surface energy budget and boundary-layer processes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Extreme weather events often interact with anomalies in sea ice concentration. Cases of strong winds transporting warm, moist air masses to the Arctic provide both dynamic and thermodynamic forcing for large sea ice anomalies, and during winter the openings in sea ice field contribute to air temperature extremes via large heat fluxes from the ocean to atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coldest winter extremes in mid-latitudes are typically associated with meandering jet stream and high-pressure blockings, but show differences between Central Europe, North America and northern China. In Central Europe the coldest events are typically associated with cold-air advection from the East or Northeast, whereas during the coldest events in North American East Coast the cold air is transported from the North. In northern China, the coldest events often occur under high-pressure conditions with weak winds. Accordingly, the role of cold-air advection is much smaller than in the case of the coldest events in North America.&lt;/p&gt;

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document