The Effects of Kephart's Perceptual Motor-Training on a Reading Clinic Sample

1972 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 545-551 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna Sullivan
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Motor Training ◽  
Binocular Fusion ◽  
Average Intelligence ◽  
Summer Session ◽  
Reading Clinic ◽  
Effectiveness Of Training

The present study is concerned with the effects of Kephart's perceptual-motor training procedures upon the reading performance of poor readers in a reading clinic population with average and above average intelligence. The study was conducted during a six-week summer session. This study also compares the effectiveness of training upon the reading performance of children with binocular fusion difficulties and those having no visual defects. Subjects were of average and above average intelligence in school grades 4 to 12. There were 41 subjects in each group, experimental and control, matched for age grade, IQ, and reading performance. All pupils received two hours of reading instruction daily. Experimental pupils received three types of perceptual-motor training for a half hour daily for six weeks: chalkboard training consisting of four tracing exercises in balance, laterality, and directionality. Results showed that perceptual-motor training had no effect upon reading comprehension of poor readers, yet effects upon oral reading were close to significant (.10 > p >.05). Kephart's perceptual-motor exercises did not improve the reading performance of children with binocular fusion difficulties.

The Impact of Reading Competence on the Ability to Take a Perspective

1979 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Grabe ◽  
Walt Prentice
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Reading Ability ◽  
Significant Interaction ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Vocabulary Test ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Good Readers ◽  
Reading Competence ◽  
The Poor ◽  
The Impact

Students grouped as good or poor readers on the basis of a vocabulary test were asked to read a story from a certain perspective or with instructions to read carefully. While the groups given a perspective recalled more information than the control groups, the most interesting results came from the significant interaction of reading ability, reading instruction and type of information. Relative to good readers in the control condition, good readers given a perspective responded with greater recall of information related to the perspective. The poor readers appeared unable or unwilling to use the perspective in differentially processing the perspective relevant sentences.

Relative Effects of Two Previewing Procedures on LD Adolescents' Oral Reading Performance

1984 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry L. Rose ◽  
Lee Sherry
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Disabled Students ◽  
Alternating Treatments Design ◽  
Assigned Reading ◽  
Instructional Procedures ◽  
Student Reading ◽  
School Learning

An alternating-treatments design was used to investigate the relative effects of two oral reading previewing procedures: (a) silent: the student reads silently the assigned reading passage prior to reading it aloud, and (b) listening: the teacher reads the assigned selection aloud with the student following along silently prior to the student reading the passage aloud. Five junior-high school learning disabled students, four boys and one girl, participated in the study. In four of five cases results showed that systematic prepractice procedures were related to higher performance levels than was baseline (no prepractice). Differential effects were noted: the listening procedure was related to higher rates of words read correctly than was the silent procedure. The findings are discussed in terms of their implications for research and instructional procedures, especially as these relate to adolescent learners.

scholarly journals Parental Reading Beliefs and Children's Reading Performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 3-16
Author(s):  
Amirah Jazimah Sabjan
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Basic Knowledge ◽  
Reading Beliefs ◽  
Quota Sampling ◽  
Children's Reading ◽  
Children’S Reading

Abstract This study put its interest in investigating parental reading beliefs and children’s reading performance. It also sought to determine whether there is an association between parental reading beliefs and children’s reading performance. This research employed a quantitative research design and it used a quota sampling technique to select the respondents. A total of 30 parents from Sekolah Kebangsaan Sungai Pusu Kuala Lumpur answered a questionnaire about parental reading beliefs. The questionnaire used was adapted from a study by DeBaryshe and Binder (1994). In order to measure the children’s reading performance, the parents were asked to state their children’s comprehension marks towards the end of the questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of five factors related to parental reading beliefs which were teaching efficacy, positive attitude, verbal participation, reading instruction and basic knowledge. The data collected was analysed using Pearson Correlation. The results showed that all the factors under parental reading beliefs had positive relationship with children’s reading performance except for one factor which was reading instruction. All of them were not significant and as this study was a preliminary study, hence the results should not be generalised due to number of reasons. Keywords: Parents, reading beliefs, reading performance, primary school, quantitative research

Teacher Ability in Recording Oral Reading Performance

1978 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 187-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L Allington
Keyword(s):  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Teacher Ability

Comparison of Paragraph Comprehension Test Scores with Reading versus Listening-Reading and Multiple-Choice versus Nominal Recall Administration Techniques: Justification for the Bypass Approach

1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1131-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren A. Weinberg ◽  
Anne McLean ◽  
Robert L. Snider ◽  
Jeanne W. Rintelmann ◽  
Roger A. Brumback
Keyword(s):  
Oral Reading ◽  
Correct Answer ◽  
Multiple Choice ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Good Readers ◽  
Test Form ◽  
Recall Method ◽  
Input Method ◽  
Choice Testing ◽  
Choice Method

Eight groups of learning disabled children ( N = 100), categorized by the clinical Lexical Paradigm as good readers or poor readers, were individually administered the Gilmore Oral Reading Test, Form D, by one of four input/retrieval methods: (1) the standardized method of administration in which the child reads each paragraph aloud and then answers five questions relating to the paragraph [read/recall method]; (2) the child reads each paragraph aloud and then for each question selects the correct answer from among three choices read by the examiner [read/choice method]; (3) the examiner reads each paragraph aloud and reads each of the five questions to the child to answer [listen/recall method]; and (4) the examiner reads each paragraph aloud and then for each question reads three multiple-choice answers from which the child selects the correct answer [listen/choice method]. The major difference in scores was between the groups tested by the recall versus the orally read multiple-choice methods. This study indicated that poor readers who listened to the material and were tested by orally read multiple-choice format could perform as well as good readers. The performance of good readers was not affected by listening or by the method of testing. The multiple-choice testing improved the performance of poor readers independent of the input method. This supports the arguments made previously that a “bypass approach” to education of poor readers in which testing is accomplished using an orally read multiple-choice format can enhance the child's school performance on reading-related tasks. Using a listening while reading input method may further enhance performance.

Hemispheric Laterality for Spatial Analysis in Children with Reading Problems

1986 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 537-538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Grogan
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Perception ◽  
Visual Display ◽  
Spatial Processing ◽  
Poor Readers ◽  
Reading Problems ◽  
Left Hand ◽  
The Poor ◽  
Average Intelligence ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Average Readers

Lateralisation for tactile-spatial perception was studied in 21 10- to 15-yr.-old boys of average intelligence who were underachieving in reading and 21 matched controls. Controls showed a significant advantage at recognising shapes on a visual display when they had been actively felt with the left hand. There was no difference between left- and right-hand scores in the poor readers. This supports Witelson's (1977) finding that poor readers are less lateralised for spatial-processing than are average readers.

Impact of Intensive Summer Reading Intervention for Children With Reading Disabilities and Difficulties in Early Elementary School

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanna A. Christodoulou ◽  
Abigail Cyr ◽  
Jack Murtagh ◽  
Patricia Chang ◽  
Jiayi Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Reading Intervention ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Disabilities ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Summer Reading ◽  
Pseudoword Reading ◽  
Intensive Reading

Efficacy of an intensive reading intervention implemented during the nonacademic summer was evaluated in children with reading disabilities or difficulties (RD). Students (ages 6–9) were randomly assigned to receive Lindamood-Bell’s Seeing Stars program ( n = 23) as an intervention or to a waiting-list control group ( n = 24). Analysis of pre- and posttesting revealed significant interactions in favor of the intervention group for untimed word and pseudoword reading, timed pseudoword reading, oral reading fluency, and symbol imagery. The interactions mostly reflected (a) significant declines in the nonintervention group from pre- to posttesting, and (2) no decline in the intervention group. The current study offers direct evidence for widening differences in reading abilities between students with RD who do and do not receive intensive summer reading instruction. Intervention implications for RD children are discussed, especially in relation to the relevance of summer intervention to prevent further decline in struggling early readers.

Reading Instruction for Elementary-Age Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: Academic and Behavioral Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Vol 72 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sally M. Barton-Arwood ◽  
Joseph H. Wehby ◽  
Katherine B. Falk
Keyword(s):  
Reading Achievement ◽  
Reading Instruction ◽  
Learning Strategies ◽  
Behavioral Disorders ◽  
Reading Fluency ◽  
Reading Intervention ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Social Behaviors ◽  
Reading Program ◽  
Future Research

This study evaluated the effects of a reading intervention on the reading achievement and social behaviors of 6 third-grade students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Reading instruction occurred 4 days a week using the Horizons Fast Track reading program and Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies. Analyses indicated variable improvements in basic reading skills with limited transfer to oral reading fluency. Outcomes for social behaviors indicated that changes in total inappropriate behavior were not directly related to the reading intervention; improved engagement appeared related to intervention but not necessarily reading achievement. Results are discussed in the context of possible reasons for differential responding and implications for practice and future research.

Effects of two Error-Correction Procedures on Oral Reading

1982 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terry L. Rose ◽  
Elizabeth McEntire ◽  
Carol Dowdy
Keyword(s):  
Error Correction ◽  
Oral Reading ◽  
Reading Skills ◽  
Relative Effectiveness ◽  
Learning Disabled ◽  
Reading Performance ◽  
Alternating Treatments Design ◽  
Systematic Correction ◽  
School Learning ◽  
Error Correction Procedures

An alternating-treatments design was used to investigate the relative effectiveness of two error-correction procedures, word supply and phonic analysis, on the oral reading performance of five elementary-school learning disabled students, four boys and one girl. All subjects had deficient oral reading skills. Results indicated that (a) increased oral reading rates were related to systematic correction procedures, and (b) the word-supply procedure was relatively superior to the phonic analysis method. Possible reasons for these findings are discussed, as are suggestions for future investigations and implications for instruction.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document