scholarly journals t(8;21)(q22;q22) fusion proteins preferentially bind to duplicated AML1/RUNX1 DNA-binding sequences to differentially regulate gene expression

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (4) ◽  
pp. 1392-1401 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko J. Okumura ◽  
Luke F. Peterson ◽  
Fumihiko Okumura ◽  
Anita Boyapati ◽  
Dong-Er Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Chromosome Abnormalities ◽  
Cancer Development ◽  
Dna Binding Site

AbstractChromosome abnormalities are frequently associated with cancer development. The 8;21(q22;q22) chromosomal translocation is one of the most common chromosome abnormalities identified in leukemia. It generates fusion proteins between AML1 and ETO. Since AML1 is a well-defined DNA-binding protein, AML1-ETO fusion proteins have been recognized as DNA-binding proteins interacting with the same consensus DNA-binding site as AML1. The alteration of AML1 target gene expression due to the presence of AML1-ETO is related to the development of leukemia. Here, using a 25-bp random double-stranded oligonucleotide library and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based DNA-binding site screen, we show that compared with native AML1, AML1-ETO fusion proteins preferentially bind to DNA sequences with duplicated AML1 consensus sites. This finding is further confirmed by both in vitro and in vivo DNA-protein interaction assays. These results suggest that AML1-ETO fusion proteins have a selective preference for certain AML1 target genes that contain multimerized AML1 consensus sites in their regulatory elements. Such selected regulation provides an important molecular mechanism for the dysregulation of gene expression during cancer development.

scholarly journals Hesx1 homeodomain protein represses transcription as a monomer and antagonises transactivation of specific sites as a homodimer

2002 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-205 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Quirk ◽  
P Brown
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Anterior Pituitary ◽  
Homeodomain Protein ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Differentiation Markers ◽  
Proximal Half ◽  
Dna Binding Site

The homeobox repressor Hesx1, expressed throughout Rathke's pouch and required for normal pituitary development, has been implicated in anterior pituitary pathogenesis in man. Prolonged expression of Hesx1 delays the appearance of anterior pituitary terminal differentiation markers in mice, particularly the gonadotroph hormones. We tested if Hesx1 could modulate gonadotrophin gene expression directly, and found that Hesx1 repressed both common alpha subunit (alpha GSU) and luteinising hormone beta-subunit (LH beta) gene promoters. Repression mapped to the Pitx1 homeodomain protein transactivation site in the proximal alpha GSU promoter, but did not map to the equivalent site on LH beta. Hesx1 repression of the alpha GSU Pitx1 site was overridden by co-transfection of Pitx1. In contrast, Hesx1 antagonised Pitx1 transactivation of LH beta in a dose-dependent manner. This was due to monomeric binding of Hesx1 on alpha GSU and homodimerisation on LH beta. The homodimerisation site comprises the Pitx1 DNA binding site and a proximal binding site, and mutation of either inhibited homodimer formation. Conversion of the LH beta Pitx1 DNA binding site to an alpha GSU-type did not promote homodimer formation, arguing that Hesx1 has pronounced site selectivity. Furthermore, mutation of the proximal half of the homodimerisation site blocked Hesx1 antagonisation of Pitx1 transactivation. We conclude that Hesx1 monomers repress gene expression, and homodimers block specific transactivation sites.

scholarly journals Evolutionary Analysis of Transcriptional Regulation Mediated by Cdx2 in Rodents

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weizheng Liang ◽  
Guipeng Li ◽  
Huanhuan Cui ◽  
Yukai Wang ◽  
Wencheng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Amino Acid ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Evolutionary Analysis ◽  
Protein Sequence Analysis ◽  
Functional Differences ◽  
Transcriptional Effect

Abstract Background: Differences in gene expression, which arises from divergence in cis-regulatory elements or alterations in transcription factors (TFs) binding specificity, are one of the most important causes of phenotypic diversity during evolution. On one hand, changes in the cis-elements located in the vicinity of target genes affect TF binding and/or local chromatin environment, thereby modulating gene expression in one-to-one manner. On the other hand, alterations in trans-factors influence the expression of their target genes in a more pleiotropic fashion. Although evolution of amino acid sequences is much slower than that of non-coding regulatory elements, particularly for the TF DNA binding domains (DBD)， it is still possible that changes in TF-DBD might have the potential to drive large phenotypic changes if the resulting effects have a net positive effect on the organism’s fitness. If so, species-specific changes in TF-DBD might be positively selected. So far, however, this possibility has been largely unexplored.Results: By protein sequence analysis, we observed high sequence conservation in the DNA binding domain (DBD) of the transcription factor Cdx2 across many vertebrates, whereas three amino acid changes were exclusively found in mouse Cdx2 (mCdx2), suggesting potential positive selection in the mouse lineage. Multi-omics analyses were then carried out to investigate the effects of these changes. Surprisingly, there were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Finally, we used rat-mouse allodiploid embryonic stem cells (RMES) to study the cis effects of Cdx2-mediated gene regulation between the two rodents. Interestingly, whereas Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat, the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent.Conclusions: There were no significant functional differences between mCdx2 and its rat homologue (rCdx2), and none of the three amino acid changes had any impact on its function. Moreover, Cdx2 binding is largely divergent between mouse and rat, the transcriptional effect induced by Cdx2 is conserved to a much larger extent.

scholarly journals Bayesian Linear Mixed Models for Motif Activity Analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Lederer ◽  
Tom Heskes ◽  
Simon J. van Heeringen ◽  
Cornelis A. Albers
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Ridge Regression ◽  
Mixed Model ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Linear Mixed Model ◽  
Covariance Structure ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Mathematical Explanation ◽  
Experimental Conditions

AbstractMotivationCellular identity and behavior is controlled by complex gene regulatory networks. Transcription factors (TFs) bind to specific DNA sequences to regulate the transcription of their target genes. On the basis of these TF motifs in cis-regulatory elements we can model the influence of TFs on gene expression. In such models of TF motif activity the data is usually modeled assuming a linear relationship between the motif activity and the gene expression level. A commonly used method to model motif influence is based on Ridge Regression. One important assumption of linear regression is the independence between samples. However, if samples are generated from the same cell line, tissue, or other biological source, this assumption may be invalid. This same assumption of independence is also applied to different, yet similar, experimental conditions, which may also be inappropriate. In theory, the independence assumption between samples could lead to loss in signal detection. Here we investigate whether a Bayesian model that allows for correlations results in more accurate inference of motif activities.ResultsWe extend the Ridge Regression to a Bayesian Linear Mixed Model, which allows us to model dependence between different samples. In a simulation study, we in-vestigate the differences between the two model assumptions. We show that our Bayesian Linear Mixed Model implementation outperforms Ridge Regression in a simulation scenario where the noise, the signal that can not be explained by TF motifs, is uncorrelated. However, we demonstrate that there is no such gain in performance if the noise has a similar covariance structure over samples as the signal that can be explained by motifs. We give a mathematical explanation to why this is the case. Using two representative real data sets we show that at most ∼ 40% of the signal is explained by motifs using the linear model. With these data there is no advantage to using the Bayesian Linear Mixed Model, due to the similarity of the covariance structure.Availability & ImplementationThe project implementation is available at https://github.com/Sim19/SimGEXPwMotifs.

scholarly journals Crystal Structure of the DNA-Binding Domain of Human Herpesvirus 6A Immediate Early Protein 2

2017 ◽  
Vol 91 (21) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro Nishimura ◽  
Junjie Wang ◽  
Aika Wakata ◽  
Kento Sakamoto ◽  
Yasuko Mori
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Human Herpesvirus ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Immediate Early ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Early Protein ◽  
Dna Binding Site

ABSTRACT Immediate early proteins of human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) are expressed at the outset of lytic infection and thereby regulate viral gene expression. Immediate early protein 2 (IE2) of HHV-6A is a transactivator that drives a variety of promoters. The C-terminal region of HHV-6A IE2 is shared among IE2 homologs in betaherpesviruses and is involved in dimerization, DNA binding, and transcription factor binding. In this study, the structure of the IE2 C-terminal domain (IE2-CTD) was determined by X-ray crystallography at a resolution of 2.5 Å. IE2-CTD forms a homodimer stabilized by a β-barrel core with two interchanging long loops. Unexpectedly, the core structure resembles those of the gammaherpesvirus factors EBNA1 of Epstein-Barr virus and LANA of Kaposi sarcoma-associated herpesvirus, but the interchanging loops are longer in IE2-CTD and form helix-turn-helix (HTH)-like motifs at their tips. The HTH and surrounding α-helices form a structural feature specific to the IE2 group. The apparent DNA-binding site (based on structural similarity with EBNA1 and LANA) resides on the opposite side of the HTH-like motifs, surrounded by positive electrostatic potential. Mapping analysis of conserved residues on the three-dimensional structure delineated a potential factor-binding site adjacent to the expected DNA-binding site. The predicted bi- or tripartite functional sites indicate a role for IE2-CTD as an adapter connecting the promoter and transcriptional factors that drive gene expression. IMPORTANCE Human herpesvirus 6A (HHV-6A) and HHV-6B belong to betaherpesvirus subfamily. Both viruses establish lifelong latency after primary infection, and their reactivation poses a significant risk to immunocompromised patients. Immediate early protein 2 (IE2) of HHV-6A and HHV-6B is a transactivator that triggers viral replication and contains a DNA-binding domain shared with other betaherpesviruses such as human herpesvirus 7 and human cytomegalovirus. In this study, an atomic structure of the DNA-binding domain of HHV-6A IE2 was determined and analyzed, enabling a structure-based understanding of the functions of IE2, specifically DNA recognition and interaction with transcription factors. Unexpectedly, the dimeric core resembles the DNA-binding domain of transcription regulators from gammaherpesviruses, showing structural conservation as a DNA-binding domain but with its own unique structural features. These findings facilitate further characterization of this key viral transactivator.

scholarly journals The cis-regulatory logic underlying abdominal Hox-mediated repression versus activation of regulatory elements in Drosophila

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arya Zandvakili ◽  
Juli Uhl ◽  
Ian Campbell ◽  
Yuntao Charlie Song ◽  
Brian Gebelein
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Dna Sequences ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Protease Gene ◽  
Precise Integration

AbstractHox genes encode a family of transcription factors that, despite having similar in vitro DNA binding preferences, regulate distinct genetic programs along the metazoan anterior-posterior axis. To better define mechanisms of Hox specificity, we compared and contrasted the ability of abdominal Hox factors to regulate two cis-regulatory elements within the Drosophila embryo. Both the Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Abdominal-A (Abd-A) Hox factors form cooperative complexes with the Extradenticle (Exd) and Homothorax (Hth) transcription factors to repress the distal-less leg selector gene via the DCRE, whereas only Abd-A interacts with Exd and Hth on the RhoA element to activate a rhomboid serine protease gene that stimulates Epidermal Growth Factor secretion. By swapping binding sites between these elements, we found that the RhoA Exd/Hth/Hox site configuration that mediates Abd-A specific activation can also convey transcriptional repression by both Ubx and Abd-A when placed into the DCRE, but only in one orientation. We further show that the orientation and spacing of Hox sites relative to additional transcription factor binding sites within the RhoA and DCRE elements is critical to mediate appropriate cell- and segment-specific output. These results indicate that the interaction between Hox, Exd, and Hth neither determines activation vs repression specificity nor defines Ubx vs Abd-A specificity. Instead the precise integration of Hox sites with additional TF inputs is required for accurate transcriptional output. Taken together, these studies provide new insight into the mechanisms of Hox target and regulatory specificity as well as the constraints placed on regulatory elements to convey appropriate outputs.Author SummaryThe Hox genes encode a family of transcription factors that give cells within each region along the developing body plan a unique identity in animals from worms to mammals. Surprisingly, however, most of the Hox factors bind the same or highly similar DNA sequences. These findings raise a paradox: How can proteins that have highly similar DNA binding properties perform different functions in the animal by regulating different sets of target genes? In this study, we address this question by studying how two Hox factors regulate the expression of target genes that specify leg development and the making of liver-like cells in the developing fly. By comparing and contrasting how Hox target genes are activated and/or repressed, we found that the same Hox binding sites can mediate either activation or repression in a manner that depends upon context. In addition, we found that a Hox binding site that is normally regulated by only one Hox factor, can also be used by more than one Hox factor swapped into another target gene. These findings indicate that the specificity of a Hox factor to regulate target genes does not rely solely upon DNA binding specificity but also requires regulatory specificity.

scholarly journals Selective DNA Binding and Association with the CREB Binding Protein Coactivator Contribute to Differential Activation of Alpha/Beta Interferon Genes by Interferon Regulatory Factors 3 and 7

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 6342-6353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rongtuan Lin ◽  
Pierre Génin ◽  
Yaël Mamane ◽  
John Hiscott
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Creb Binding Protein ◽  
Regulatory Factors ◽  
Transactivation Activity ◽  
Dna Binding Site ◽  
Alpha Beta ◽  
Selective Dna Binding

ABSTRACT Recent studies implicate the interferon (IFN) regulatory factors (IRF) IRF-3 and IRF-7 as key activators of the alpha/beta IFN (IFN-α/β) genes as well as the RANTES chemokine gene. Using coexpression analysis, the human IFNB, IFNA1, and RANTES promoters were stimulated by IRF-3 coexpression, whereas the IFNA4, IFNA7, and IFNA14 promoters were preferentially induced by IRF-7 only. Chimeric proteins containing combinations of different IRF-7 and IRF-3 domains were also tested, and the results provided evidence of distinct DNA binding properties of IRF-3 and IRF-7, as well as a preferential association of IRF-3 with the CREB binding protein (CBP) coactivator. Interestingly, some of these fusion proteins led to supraphysiological levels of IFN promoter activation. DNA binding site selection studies demonstrated that IRF-3 and IRF-7 bound to the 5′-GAAANNGAAANN-3′ consensus motif found in many virus-inducible genes; however, a single nucleotide substitution in either of the GAAA half-site motifs eliminated IRF-3 binding and transactivation activity but did not affect IRF-7 interaction or transactivation activity. These studies demonstrate that IRF-3 possesses a restricted DNA binding site specificity and interacts with CBP, whereas IRF-7 has a broader DNA binding specificity that contributes to its capacity to stimulate delayed-type IFN gene expression. These results provide an explanation for the differential regulation of IFN-α/β gene expression by IRF-3 and IRF-7 and suggest that these factors have complementary rather than redundant roles in the activation of the IFN-α/β genes.

scholarly journals Expression from DIF1-motif promoters of hetR and patS is dependent on HetZ and modulated by PatU3 during heterocyst differentiation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yaru Du ◽  
He Zhang ◽  
Hong Wang ◽  
Shuai Wang ◽  
Qiqin Lei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Differentiation ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Target Genes ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Heterocyst Differentiation ◽  
Recognition Sites ◽  
Mutual Regulation

HetR and PatS/PatX-derived peptides are the activator and diffusible inhibitor for cell differentiation and patterning in heterocyst-forming cyanobacteria. HetR regulates target genes via HetR-recognition sites. However, some genes (such as patS / patX ) upregulated at the early stage of heterocyst differentiation possess DIF1 (or DIF + ) motif (TCCGGA) promoters rather than HetR-recognition sites; hetR possesses both regulatory elements. How HetR controls heterocyst-specific expression from DIF1 motif promoters remains to be answered. This study presents evidence that the expression from DIF1 motif promoters of hetR , patS and patX is more directly dependent on hetZ , a gene regulated by HetR via a HetR-recognition site. The HetR-binding site upstream of hetR is not required for the autoregulation. PatU3 (3′ portion of PatU) that interacts with HetZ may modulate HetZ-dependent gene expression. These findings contribute to understanding of the mutual regulation of hetR , hetZ-patU and patS / patX in a large group of multicellular cyanobacteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document