scholarly journals Work Status, Missed Time at Work, Work Performance, and Quality of Life in Adult Survivors of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant in Childhood

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3049-3049
Author(s):  
Neel S. Bhatt ◽  
Akasha K. Palou Torres ◽  
Judith Myers ◽  
Rachel Phelan ◽  
Bronwen E. Shaw

Abstract Background: Post-allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) work status is an important indicator of survivors' health recovery and social and economic well-being. However, current literature lacks data on work status, missed time at work, work performance, and quality of life (QOL) of long-term survivors of childhood HCT. Methods: A cross-sectional web-based survey study of ≥1-year survivors of childhood allogeneic HCT (performed between 1985-2010 at Children's Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) who were <18 years of age at HCT and ≥18 years of age at their most recent assessment. Eligible survivors were identified using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research database and contacted by email and/or mail. Validated patient reported outcomes measures, the World Health Organization Health and Work Performance Questionnaire (HPQ) and the National Institutes of Health Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) were used to capture work and QOL data, respectively. Using HPQ responses, working survivors' work absenteeism and presenteeism scores were calculated. Absenteeism scores were also calculated for the survivors who reported to be students. Absolute absenteeism was defined as 4*(no. of hours expected at work or school) - no. of hours actually worked or attended school. Relative absenteeism was defined as absolute absenteeism score/ 4*(no. of hours expected at work or school). Absolute presenteeism was defined as 10*(self-reported work performance in last 4 weeks). Relative presenteeism was defined as self-reported work performance in last 4 weeks / self-reported performance of co-workers. Higher absenteeism and presenteeism scores indicated higher missed time at work or school and better work performance, respectively. PROMIS domains were scored on a T-score metric with a mean score of reference population at 50 and standard deviation of 10. The primary outcome was individual PROMIS domain score as a continuous variable. Univariate linear regression was performed to study factors associated with increase in PROMIS domain scores. For negatively worded domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive concerns, pain interference), higher score was considered worse and for positively worded domains (physical function, satisfaction with social roles and activities), lower score was considered worse. Student survivors were considered employed in the analysis. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of 99 allogeneic HCT recipients who met the selection criteria, 47 initiated the survey and 44 completed it (44% response rate). At the time of survey, 73% (n=32) of the respondents were working, 23% (n=10) were unemployed, and 4% (n=2) were students. Median age at HCT and survey were 11.1 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.0-13.5) and 30.0 years (IQR 26.5-34.0), respectively. Median follow-up from HCT was 22 years (range 9-32). Fifty two percent were females and 75% received HCT for malignant diseases (acute lymphoblastic leukemia 45%). Compared to unemployed survivors, employed survivors reported less pain interference and sleep disturbance (Figure 1). History of acute graft vs. host disease (GVHD) was associated with worse physical function. Median absolute absenteeism and presenteeism scores were 0 hours (IQR [-1.5]-16) and 83 (IQR 73-92), respectively. Higher absolute presenteeism was associated with less pain interference and more satisfaction with social roles and activities and physical function. Higher relative presenteeism was associated with less cognitive concerns. Higher absolute absenteeism was associated with less depression and higher relative absenteeism with less fatigue (Table 1). Conclusions: Nearly a quarter of the survivors reported being unemployed at the time of the survey. Significant associations between survivors' work status, work performance, and QOL were identified. Our findings provide an important insight on the implications of work outcomes on HCT survivors' physical, mental, and social health and emphasizes the importance of routine longitudinal assessment of work status, performance and QOL in this population. These results also have the potential to help develop effective communication strategies with employers to balance work expectations of survivors in order to achieve better work productivity and in turn, good QOL. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bhatt: Johnson & Johnson: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Moderna, Inc.: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Pfizer Inc.: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Rite Aid Corporation: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Phelan: Amgen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Shaw: mallinkrodt: Other: payments; Orca bio: Consultancy.

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2868-2868
Author(s):  
Neel S. Bhatt ◽  
Akshay Sharma ◽  
Andrew St. Martin ◽  
Michael Martens ◽  
Marcie L. Riches ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Adult recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are at a very high risk of adverse outcomes after COVID-19 (Sharma A, Bhatt NS, et al. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of COVID-19 in haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation recipients: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Haematology. 2021 Mar 1;8(3): e185-93). While children are known to have better outcomes after COVID-19 compared to adults in general, data on risk factors and outcomes of COVID-19 among pediatric recipients of HCT are lacking. Methods: Using the data reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) between March 2020 and May 2021, we describe characteristics, severity, treatment approaches, and outcomes of pediatric HCT recipients who were ≤21 years of age at COVID-19 diagnosis. All diagnoses, donor choice/graft sources, and conditioning regimens were included. Patient, disease, and HCT-related factors were described as frequency for categorical variables and median, range, and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. The probability of overall survival after COVID-19 was calculated using the Kaplan Meier estimator. Additionally, an analysis was performed in the subset of allogeneic HCT COVID-19 cases from the United States (US) to identify risk factors for developing COVID-19. COVID-19 cases were compared with a cohort of all pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients without COVID-19 matched by the transplant center. Impact of hematopoietic cell transplant comorbidity index (HCT-CI), HCT indication, donor type, conditioning intensity, graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis, and occurrence of acute and chronic GVHD on development of COVID-19 was examined using Cox proportional hazards model. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were provided. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 among the US centers reporting at least 1 COVID-19 infection was also calculated, using death from any cause as a competing risk. P value <0.05 was considered statistically significant for the analyses. Results: A total of 167 pediatric HCT recipients (allogeneic, allo: 135 and autologous, auto: 32) met study inclusion criteria. Median age at COVID-19 diagnosis for allo and auto HCT recipients were 15 years (range <1-21y) and 7 years (range 1-21y), respectively. Median time from HCT to COVID-19 diagnosis was 15 months (IQR 7-45) for allo recipients and 16 months (IQR 6-59) for auto HCT recipients. Forty-two percent (42%) of the patients had at least one comorbidity prior to HCT. Thirteen percent (13%) were receiving immunosuppression within six months prior to COVID-19 diagnosis. COVID-19 disease severity was mild in 87% of patients, while 4% of patients had severe disease requiring mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen. Only 36 HCT recipients (22%) received any COVID-19 directed therapy. Median follow-up from COVID-19 diagnosis was 53 days (range 1-270) and 37 days (range 1-179) for allo and auto HCT recipients, respectively. The overall probability of survival at 45 days was 95% (95% CI 90-99%) and 90% (95% CI 74-99%) for allo and auto HCT recipients, respectively (Figure 1). Forty-five (45) day survival was lower among recipients transplanted at the transplant centers outside the US [non-US recipients 85% (95% CI 71-95%) versus US recipients 98% (95% CI 93-99%)]. No deaths occurred in patients who had received a transplant between 2000-2013. The primary cause of death was COVID-19 in 54% of patients and primary disease in 38% of patients. In the subset analysis restricted to pediatric allogeneic HCT recipients transplanted at the US centers (n=34), the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 infection was noted to be 1.9% (95% CI 1.2-2.9%) at 6 months post-HCT and increased to 4.7% (95% CI 3.4-6.3%) by 1-year post-HCT. Cox regression analysis showed that compared to HCT-CI score of 0, patients with HCT-CI score of 1-2 were more likely to develop COVID-19 (HR 1.95; 95% CI 1.03-3.69, p=0.042). Underlying diagnosis, donor type, treatment exposures, or GVHD did not predict COVID-19 incidence. Conclusions: This is the largest series to date summarizing the cumulative incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of pediatric HCT recipients with COVID-19. Patients with pre-HCT comorbidities were more likely to develop COVID-19. However, the overall disease severity and mortality after COVID-19 were low in this patient cohort. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Bhatt: Rite Aid Corporation: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Pfizer Inc.: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Moderna, Inc.: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months; Johnson & Johnson: Divested equity in a private or publicly-traded company in the past 24 months. Sharma: Medexus Inc: Consultancy; Spotlight Therapeutics: Consultancy; Vindico Medical Education: Honoraria; CRISPR Therapeutics: Other, Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Salary support paid to institution; Vertex Pharmaceuticals/CRISPR Therapeutics: Other: Salary support paid to institution. Riches: ATARA Biotherapeutics: Other: Payment; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Payment; BioIntelect: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Dandoy: Omeros: Other: Consulted and received Honorarium.


Author(s):  
Ali Aneizi ◽  
Patrick M. J. Sajak ◽  
Aymen Alqazzaz ◽  
Tristan Weir ◽  
Cameran I. Burt ◽  
...  

AbstractThe objectives of this study are to assess perioperative opioid use in patients undergoing knee surgery and to examine the relationship between preoperative opioid use and 2-year postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs). We hypothesized that preoperative opioid use and, more specifically, higher quantities of preoperative opioid use would be associated with worse PROs in knee surgery patients. We studied 192 patients undergoing knee surgery at a single urban institution. Patients completed multiple PRO measures preoperatively and 2-year postoperatively, including six patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) domains; the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaire, numeric pain scale (NPS) scores for the operative knee and the rest of the body, Marx's knee activity rating scale, Tegner's activity scale, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, as well as measures of met expectations, overall improvement, and overall satisfaction. Total morphine equivalents (TMEs) were calculated from a regional prescription monitoring program. Eighty patients (41.7%) filled an opioid prescription preoperatively, and refill TMEs were significantly higher in this subpopulation. Opioid use was associated with unemployment, government insurance, smoking, depression, history of prior surgery, higher body mass index, greater comorbidities, and lower treatment expectations. Preoperative opioid use was associated with significantly worse 2-year scores on most PROs, including PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, social satisfaction, IKDC, NPS for the knee and rest of the body, and Marx's and Tegner's scales. There was a significant dose-dependent association between greater preoperative TMEs and worse scores for PROMIS physical function, pain interference, fatigue, social satisfaction, NPS body, and Marx's and Tegner's scales. Multivariable analysis confirmed that any preoperative opioid use, but not quantity of TMEs, was an independent predictor of worse 2-year scores for function, activity, and knee pain. Preoperative opioid use and TMEs were neither independent predictors of met expectations, satisfaction, patient-perceived improvement, nor improvement on any PROs. Our findings demonstrate that preoperative opioid use is associated with clinically relevant worse patient-reported knee function and pain after knee surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Benjamin Nowell ◽  
Kelly Gavigan ◽  
Carol L. Kannowski ◽  
Zhihong Cai ◽  
Theresa Hunter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly used to track symptoms and to assess disease activity, quality of life, and treatment effectiveness. It is therefore important to understand which PROs patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal disease consider most important to track for disease management. Methods Adult US patients within the ArthritisPower registry with ankylosing spondylitis, fibromyalgia syndrome, osteoarthritis, osteoporosis, psoriatic arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus were invited to select between 3 and 10 PRO symptom measures they felt were important to digitally track for their condition via the ArthritisPower app. Over the next 3 months, participants (pts) were given the option to continue tracking their previously selected measures or to remove/add measures at 3 subsequent monthly time points (month [m] 1, m2, m3). At m3, pts prioritized up to 5 measures. Measures were rank-ordered, summed, and weighted based on pts rating to produce a summary score for each PRO measure. Results Among pts who completed initial selection of PRO assessments at baseline (N = 253), 140 pts confirmed or changed PRO selections across m1–3 within the specified monthly time window (28 days ± 7). PROs ranked as most important for tracking were PROMIS Fatigue, Physical Function, Pain Intensity, Pain Interference, Duration of Morning Joint Stiffness, and Sleep Disturbance. Patient’s preferences regarding the importance of these PROs were stable over time. Conclusion The symptoms that rheumatology patients prioritized for longitudinal tracking using a smartphone app were fatigue, physical function, pain, and morning joint stiffness.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene L Katzan ◽  
Dolora R Wisco ◽  
Brittany Lapin

Background: Self-efficacy is the belief that one is able to respond to demands of a stressful situation and it has both direct and indirect effects on health. The study objective is to investigate the amount of variance in patient-reported physical function (PF) that is explained by self-efficacy compared to clinician-reported disability and other patient-reported domains of health, and evaluate whether self-efficacy mediates the relationship between PF and other domains of health. Methods: Observational cohort study of 248 patients who were seen in a cerebrovascular clinic 3/18/20 - 7/7/20 and completed the following patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) as part of the routine office visit: PROMIS PF, general self-efficacy, fatigue, and pain interference. Linear regression models were constructed to determine the amount of variance (adjusted R 2 ) in PROMIS PF score explained by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and additional PROM scores. The mRS and individual PROMs were added separately to a base model adjusted for demographic characteristics. Mediation analysis was conducted to determine the extent to which self-efficacy mediated the relationship between PF and other PROMs. Results: Mean age of study cohort was 61.5 (SD=13.5) years and 48.4% were female. The base model explained 4.5% of the variance of PF. Adding PROMIS fatigue resulted in the largest increase in the proportion of variance explained (adj R 2 = 47.7%), followed by PROMIS self-efficacy (40.7%), PROMIS pain interference (38.7%), and mRS (26.6%). Self-efficacy significantly mediated the relationship between fatigue and PF (standardized indirect effect: 0.11 (bias-corrected 95% CI: 0.05-0.18), 20.9% of total effect) and pain interference and PF (standardized indirect effect 0.10 (95% CI: 0.06-0.17), 27.1% of total effect). Conclusion: PROMIS self-efficacy explains more variance in stroke patients’ perceived physical function than their disability. This suggests that interventions to improve self-efficacy could have a significant effect on patient’s perceived health. Patients’ fatigue, despite being partially mediated by self-efficacy, was a large contributor to self-reported PF and should be included as part of an evaluation of patient’s physical health.


2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (14) ◽  
pp. 3620-3625
Author(s):  
David N. Bernstein ◽  
Sreten Franovic ◽  
D. Grace Smith ◽  
Luke Hessburg ◽  
Nikhil Yedulla ◽  
...  

Background: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is a powerful set of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) that are gaining popularity throughout orthopaedic surgery. The use of both adult and pediatric PROMIS questionnaires in orthopaedic sports medicine limits the value of the PROMIS in routine sports medicine clinical care, research, and quality improvement. Because orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons see patients across a wide age range, simplifying the collection of PROMIS computer adaptive tests (CATs) to a single set of questionnaires, regardless of age, is of notable value. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to determine the strength of the correlation between the pediatric and adult PROMIS questionnaires. We hypothesized that there would be a high correlation between the adult and pediatric versions for each PROMIS domain, thereby justifying the use of only the adult version for most sports medicine providers, regardless of patient age. Study Design: Cohort study (Diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Between December 2018 and December 2019, all pediatric sports medicine patients presenting to a single, academic, orthopaedic sports medicine clinic were asked to participate in the present study with their parents’ consent. Patients were asked to complete a set of adult PROMIS domains (Physical Function and/or Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Depression) as well as a set of pediatric PROMIS domains (Mobility and/or Upper Extremity, Pain Interference, and Depressive Symptoms). Concurrent validity was assessed using Pearson correlation coefficients ( r). Ceiling and floor effects were determined. Results: A total of 188 patients met our inclusion criteria. The correlation between the adult and pediatric PROMIS Upper Extremity, Physical Function and Mobility, Pain Interference, and Depression and Depressive Symptoms forms were high-moderate ( r = 0.68; P < .01), high-moderate ( r = 0.69; P < .01), high ( r = 0.78; P < .01), and high ( r = 0.85; P < .01), respectively. Both adult and pediatric depression-related PROMIS domains demonstrated notable floor effects (adult: 38%; pediatric: 24%). The pediatric PROMIS Upper Extremity domain demonstrated a ceiling effect (20%). Conclusion: Adult PROMIS CATs may be used in an orthopaedic sports medicine clinic for both adult and pediatric patients. Our findings will help decrease the amount of resources needed for the implementation and use of PROMs for patient care, research, and quality improvement in orthopaedic sports medicine clinics.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0019
Author(s):  
Ryan Hadden ◽  
James Meeker ◽  
Jason Weiss ◽  
Austin Thompson

Category: Ankle Arthritis, Orthosis Introduction/Purpose: When it comes to ambulation, the dynamic interplay of anatomy at the foot and ankle affords weight acceptance, stability and force production. The outcome is gait efficiency. Various musculoskeletal injuries challenge gait biomechanics. While surgical management may address the fault in kinetic chain, it may not fully address the problem of pain, functional outcome and patient satisfaction. Non-surgical interventions such as bracing using ankle foot orthoses (AFO) aim to assist, restore and redirect weightbearing forces with immobility in mind. As an energy-storing AFO, however, the IDEO was created to improve functional performance in veterans after limb salvage procedures. The goal of the study was to evaluate outcomes following use of Exosym (or IDEO) bracing for foot and ankle pathologies in the civilian population. Methods: Through review of one institution’s electronic medical record, 29 patients ages 18 years or older who were prescribed the Exosym brace by a single foot and ankle surgeon over a 5-year period were identified. A composite questionnaire including patient-reported outcomes of PROMIS SF Physical Function, PROMIS SF Pain Interference, Brace Use, and EQ-5D was obtained over the phone or by email. Results: A total of 29 patients were prescribed the brace over a 5-year period with only 18 patients receiving the brace. Insurance denying coverage was the most common reason (n=7) for patients not receiving the brace. Of the 18 patients that received the brace, 17 of them were willing to answer the questionnaire. The average age of patients with the Exosym brace was 42.3 (sd=13.8) years old with 6 (35%) being female. Patients with the Exosym brace reported an average score of 47.2 (sd=6.0) for the PROMIS Physical Function and 53.6 (sd=8.4) for the PROMIS Pain Interference. The average satisfaction with the Exosym brace was 65.5 (sd=17.6) out of a possible 100. Conclusion: Exosym bracing in various foot and ankle pathologies provides functionality and pain modulation in the civilian population that rivals respective subpopulation norms. One of the acknowledged limitations of the study is that not obtaining pre- bracing patient reported outcomes precluded evaluation of a minimum clinically important difference. However, the study was not designed to provide such data. It did, however, provide impetus to pursue a follow-up study evaluating plantar pressure changes with and without brace use, which is currently ongoing. Such knowledge may help identify which injuries would be best suited for Exosym bracing.


2020 ◽  
pp. 107110072095901
Author(s):  
Aoife MacMahon ◽  
Elizabeth A. Cody ◽  
Kristin Caolo ◽  
Jensen K. Henry ◽  
Mark C. Drakos ◽  
...  

Background: Various factors may affect differences between patient and surgeon expectations. This study aimed to assess associations between patient-reported physical and mental status, patient-surgeon communication, and musculoskeletal health literacy with differences in patient and surgeon expectations of foot and ankle surgery. Methods: Two hundred two patients scheduled to undergo foot or ankle surgery at an academic hospital were enrolled. Preoperatively, patients and surgeons completed the Hospital for Special Surgery Foot & Ankle Surgery Expectations Survey. Patients also completed Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) scores in Physical Function, Pain Interference, Pain Intensity, Depression, and Global Health. Patient-surgeon communication and musculoskeletal health literacy were assessed via the modified Patients’ Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICS) and Literacy in Musculoskeletal Problems (LiMP) questionnaire, respectively. Results: Greater differences in patient and surgeon overall expectations scores were associated with worse scores in Physical Function ( P = .003), Pain Interference ( P = .001), Pain Intensity ( P = .009), Global Physical Health ( P < .001), and Depression ( P = .009). A greater difference in the number of expectations between patients and surgeons was associated with all of the above ( P ≤ .003) and with worse Global Mental Health ( P = .003). Patient perceptions of higher surgeons’ partnership building were associated with a greater number of patient than surgeon expectations ( P = .017). There were no associations found between musculoskeletal health literacy and differences in expectations. Conclusion: Worse baseline patient physical and mental status and higher patient perceptions of provider partnership building were associated with higher patient than surgeon expectations. It may be beneficial for surgeons to set more realistic expectations with patients who have greater disability and in those whom they have stronger partnerships with. Further studies are warranted to understand how modifications in patient and surgeon interactions and patient health literacy affect agreement in expectations of foot and ankle surgery. Level of Evidence: Level II, prospective comparative series.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document