scholarly journals Single Cell Multi-Omic Profiling of Multiple Myeloma with t(4;14) Finds an Immune Microenvironment Gene Signature That Correlates with Clinical Outcomes

Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2653-2653
Author(s):  
Sanjay De Mel ◽  
Jonathan Adam Scolnick ◽  
Chern Han Yong ◽  
Xiaojing Huo ◽  
Stacy Xu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Multiple Myeloma (MM) is an incurable plasma cell (PC) malignancy and high risk MM remains an unmet clinical need. Translocation 4;14 occurs in 15% of MM and is associated with an adverse prognosis. A deeper understanding of the biology and immune micro-environment of t(4;14) MM is necessary for the development of effective targeted therapies. Single Cell multi-omics provides a new tool for phenotypic characterization of MM. Here we used Proteona's ESCAPE™ single cell multi-omics platform to study a cohort of patients with t(4;14) MM. Methods Diagnostic bone marrow (BM) samples from 13 patients with t(4;14) MM (one of whom had samples at diagnosis and relapse) were analysed using the ESCAPE™ platform from Proteona which simultaneously measures gene and cell surface protein expression of 65 proteins in single cells. Cryopreserved BM samples were stained with antibodies and subsequently sorted on CD138 expression. The CD138 positive and negative fractions were recombined at a 1:1 ratio for analysis using the 10x Genomics 3' RNAseq kit. Resulting data were analyzed with Proteona's MapSuite™ single cell analytics platform. In particular, Mapcell was used to annotate the cells and MapBatch was used for batch normalization in order to preserve rare cell populations. Results Patients had a median age of 63 years and received novel agent-based induction. Median progression free and overall survival (PFS and OS) were 22 and 34 months respectively. We first analyzed serial BM samples from an individual patient that were taken at diagnosis and relapse following bortezomib based treatment. The PCs in this patient showed variations in gene expression between diagnosis and relapse (Fig 1A), including the reduction of HIST1H2BG expression, which has previously been correlated with resistance to bortezomib. Subsequent analysis of the immune cells identified a shift in the ratio of T cells to CD14 monocytes from 5.7 at diagnosis to 0.6 at relapse suggesting a major change in the BM immune micro-environment in response to therapy. Next, we analyzed the malignant PCs of the diagnostic samples. As expected, MMSET (NSD2) was overexpressed in all PCs compared to normal PCs, while FGFR3 expression could be categorized into no expression of FGFR3, low expression (<10% of cells expressing FGFR3) or high expression (>80% of cells expressing FGFR3) (Fig 1B). No gene or protein expression patterns within the PCs were identified that correlated with PFS or OS in this cohort. Finally, we analyzed the immune micro-environment in the diagnostic samples (Fig 1C). While there was no overall discernable pattern of cell types present, one cluster of cells, annotated as 'unknown' cell type, suggested a small population of cells that had not been previously annotated in published single cell RNA-seq data. The cells were CD45+ and CD138 - both at the protein and RNA level, suggesting they are not plasma cells. We tested if the number of the 'unknown' cells in each sample correlated with PFS, but there was no significant correlation. We then used these cells to derive a gene signature profile which was expressed in most of the cells in the 'unknown' cluster as well as a minor fraction of cells in other clusters including some PCs. The number of cells expressing the gene signature negatively correlated with PFS, with samples containing more cells expressing the signature having a lower PFS than samples with fewer signature positive cells (Fig 2). The correlation remained significant whether we included PCs in the analysis or not, but was not significant amongst only the PC population, suggesting that the cells responsible for the correlation are from the immune micro-environment. Conclusions We present the first application of single cell multi-omic immune profiling in high-risk MM and demonstrate that t(4;14) is a phenotypically heterogenous disease. While no consistent gene or protein expression patterns were identified within the malignant cell population, we did identify gene expression changes in a relapsed patient sample that may reflect key alterations in the PCs responsible for therapy resistance. In addition, we identified a gene signature expressed in a rare population of non-plasma cells that significantly correlated with PFS in this patient cohort. These data highlight the potential of single cell multi-omic analysis to identify immune micro-environmental signatures that correlate with response to therapy in t(4;14) MM. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Scolnick: Proteona Pte Ltd: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company. Huo: Proteona Pte Ltd: Ended employment in the past 24 months. Xu: Proteona Pte Ltd: Current Employment. Chng: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Abbvie: Honoraria.

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 1806-1806 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anuj Mahindra ◽  
Samir B Amin ◽  
Gabriela Motyckova ◽  
Aliyah R. Sohani ◽  
Kishan Patel ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1806 Poster Board I-832 Plasmacytomas are rare clonal proliferations of plasma cells that though cytologically identical to plasma cell myeloma, present with osseous or extraosseous growth pattern. Understanding their molecular characteristics can provide crucial insights into their pathogenesis and risk of progression to multiple myeloma (MM). To investigate the differences between extramedullary (EMP) and medullary plasmacytomas (MP) and MM without plasmacytomas, we sought to molecularly profile these tumors by tissue microarrays, gene expression, microRNA, and FISH. We identified 85 patients from our data base with a pathological diagnosis of plasmacytoma. Of the 85 patients, 13 patients presented with EMP, and 72 had MP. Among the patients with EMP (n=13), 2 patients presented with multiple lesions. Three of 13 (23%) patients progressed to develop MM at a median of 12 months. 72 patients presented with MP, of which 21 had solitary lesions and 27 (37%) progressed to MM at a median of 20.5months. There was a male preponderance (67% vs 33%) and the median age at diagnosis was 60.5 years (range 27.7-87.6). The mean overall survival for patients with EMP was 121 months (95% confidence interval[CI] 97-144 months) and for patients with MP was 102 months (95% CI 93-128 months) { p=0.025} MicroRNA (miRNAs) profiling was performed on MP (n=19) and MM samples (n=66). Data was normalized using U6 endogenous control. Three hundred and one miRNAs out of a total 665 were significantly differentially expressed between MP vs MM samples. Gene expression profiling performed on MP will be correlated with the miRNA data to identify genes and transcripts of interest which will be functionally validated. Tissue microarrays were performed on 52 patients (8: EMP, 44: MP,) in whom paraffin-embedded tissue was available. Of samples analyzed, CD56 positivity was observed in 55% MP and 71% EMP samples (p=0.67). Additional staining for cyclin D1, Bcl 2 and FISH analysis will be reported. Differential expression patterns of factors involved in proliferation, survival, adhesion, and stroma-tumor cell interactions may help explain plasmacytoma biology and identify factors responsible for progression to MM. These insights may help identify new therapeutic approaches and targets in the treatment of these plasma cell disorders. Disclosures Hochberg: Enzon: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Biogen-Idec: Speakers Bureau; Genentech: Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Speakers Bureau. Anderson:Millennium: Research Funding. Raje:Celgene, Norvartis, Astrazeneca: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3264-3264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan K Van Laar ◽  
Ivan Borrelo ◽  
David Jabalayan ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Aga Zielinski ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: There is a global consensus that multiple myeloma patients with high-risk disease require additional monitoring and therapy compared to low/standard risk patients in order to maximize their chances of survival. Current diagnostic guidelines recommend FISH-based assessment of chromosomal aberrations to determine risk status (i.e. t(14;20), t(14;16), t(4;14) and/or Del17p), however, studies show FISH for MM may have a 20-30% QNS rate and is up to 15% discordant between laboratories, even when starting from isolated plasma cells. In this study we demonstrate that MyPRS gene expression profiling reproduces the key high risk translocations for MM risk stratification, in addition to having other significant advantages. Methods: Reproducibility studies show that MyPRS results are less than 1% discordant starting from isolated plasma cells and return successful results in up to 95% of cases. 270 MM patients from Johns Hopkins University (MD) and Weill Cornell Medicine (NY) had both FISH and MyPRS gene expression profiling performed between 2012 and 2016 using standard and previously published methodology, respectively. Results: Retrospective review of the matched FISH and MyPRS results showed: 25/28 (89%) patients wish FISH-identified t(4;14) were classified as MMSET (MS) subtype. 10/10 (100%) patients with t(14;16) or t(14;20) were classified as MAF-like (MF) subtype 62/67 (93%) patients with t(11;14) were assigned to the Cyclin D (1 or 2) subtype. Patients with FISH hyperdiploidy status were classified as the Hyperdiploid (HY) subtype or had multiple gains detected by the separate MyPRS Virtual Karyotype (VK) algorithm, included in MyPRS. TP53del was seen in patients with multiple molecular subtypes, predominantly Proliferation (PR) and MMSET (MS). Assessment of TP53 function by gene expression is a more clinically relevant prognostic marker than TP53del, as dysregulation of the tumor suppressor is affected by mutations as well as deletions. Analysis of the TP53 expression in the 39 patients with delTP53 showed a statistically significant difference, compared to patients without this deletion (P<0.0001). Conclusion: Gene expression profiling is a superior and more reliable method for determining an individual patients' prognostic risk status. The molecular subtypes of MM, as reported by Signal Genetics MyPRS assay, are driven by large-scale changes in gene expression caused by or closely associated with chromosomal changes, including translocations. Physicians who are managing myeloma patients and wishing to base their assessment of risk on R-ISS or mSMART Guidelines may obtain the required data points from either FISH or MyPRS, with the latter offering lower QNS rates, higher reproducibility, assessment of a larger number of cells and a substantially lower price point ($5,480 vs. $1,912; 2016 CMS data). A larger cohort study is now underway to further validate these observations. Figure GEP-based TP53 expression in patients with and without Del17p. P<0.0001 Figure. GEP-based TP53 expression in patients with and without Del17p. P<0.0001 Disclosures Van Laar: Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Borrelo:Sidney Kimmel Cancer Institute: Employment. Jabalayan:Weill Cornell Medical Center: Employment. Niesvizky:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Zielinski:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Leigh:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Brown:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment. Bender:Signal Genetics, Inc.: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4423-4423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caoilfhionn Connolly ◽  
Alokkumar Jha ◽  
Alessandro Natoni ◽  
Michael E O'Dwyer

Abstract Introduction Advances in genomics have highlighted the potential for individualized prognostication and therapy in multiple myeloma (MM). Previously developed gene expression signatures have identified patients with high risk (Kuiper et al, Blood 2016) however, they provide few insights into underlying disease biology thereby limiting their use in informing treatment decisions. Glycosylation is deregulated in MM (Glavey et al), and potential consequences include altered cell adhesion, signaling, immune evasion and drug resistance. In this study we have utilized RNA sequencing data from the IA7 CoMMpass cohort to characterize the expression profile of genes involved in glycosylation. This represents a novel approach to identify a distinct molecular pathway related to outcome, which is potentially actionable. Methods A pathway based approach was adopted to evaluate genes implicated in glycosylation, including the generation of selectin ligands. A literature review and KEGG pathway analysis of pathways relating to O-glycans, N-glycans, sialic acid metabolism, glycolipid synthesis and metabolism was completed. RNA Cufflinks-gene level FPKM expression of 458 patients enrolled in the IA7 cohort of the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass trial (NCT145429) were analysed as derivation cohort. We developed expression cut-offs using a novel approach of adjusted existing linear regression model to define the gene expression cut-off by applying 3rd Quartile data (q1+q2/2-qmin). The analysis of overall survival (OS) was completed using adjusted 'kpas' R-package according to our cut-off model. Association between individual transcripts and OS was analyzed with log-rank test. Genes with p-value <0.2 were used in subsequent prioritization analysis. This cut-off methodology was employed to define the nearest neighbor for a gene for Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). As far as 4th neighbor above and below the cut off was used to have centrally driven gene selection method for prioritization. The gene signature was validated in GSE2658 (Shaughnessy et al) dataset. Results Initial analysis yielded 184 prospective genes. 147 were significant on univariate analysis. Following further prioritization of these genes, we identified thirteen genes that had significant impact upon outcomes (GiMM13). Figure 1 reveals that GiMM13 signature has a significant correlation with inferior OS (HR 4.66 p-value 0.022). The prognostic impact of stratifying GiMM13 positive (High risk) or GiMM13 negative (Low risk) by ISS stage was evaluated. In Table 1. Kaplan Meier estimates generated for GiMM13 (High) or GiMM13 (Low) stratified by ISS are compared statistically using the log rank test. The prognostic ability of GiMM13 to synthesize distinct subgroups relative to each ISS stage is shown in Figure 2. ISS1-Low is the the lowest risk group with best prognosis. Hazard ratios relative to the ISS1-Low group were 1.8, p-value 0.029 (ISS2-Low), 2.1, p-value 0.031 (ISS3-Low), 4.3, p-value 0.04 (ISS1-HR), 5.9, p-value 0.039 (ISS2-HR) and 3.1, p-value 0.001 (ISS3-HR). The GiMM13 signature enhances the prognostic ability of ISS to identify patients with inferior or superior outcomes respectively. Conclusion While the therapeutic armamentarium for MM has expanded considerably, the significant molecular heterogeneity in the disease still poses a significant challenge. Our data suggests aberrant transcription of glycosylation genes, involved predominantly in selectin ligand synthesis, is associated with inferior survival outcomes and may help identify patients likely to benefit from treatment with agents targeting aberrant glycosylation, e.g. E-selectin inhibitor. Consistent with recent findings in chemoresistant minimal residual disease (MRD) (Paiva et al, Blood 2016), it would appear that O-glycosylation, rather than N-glycosylation is most significantly implicated in this biological processes conferring inferior outcomes. In conclusion, using a novel pathway-based approach to identify a 13-gene signature (GiMM13), we have developed a robust tool that can refine patient prognosis and inform clinical decision-making. Acknowledgment These data were generated as part of the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation Personalized Medicine Initiatives (https://research.themmrf.org and www.themmrf.org). Disclosures O'Dwyer: Glycomimetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3897-3897
Author(s):  
Valeriy V Lyzogubov ◽  
Pingping Qu ◽  
Cody Ashby ◽  
Adam Rosenthal ◽  
Antje Hoering ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Poor prognosis and drug resistance in multiple myeloma (MM) is associated with increased mutational load. APOBEC3B is a major contributor to mutagenesis, especially in myeloma patients with t(14;16) MAF subgroup. It was shown recently that presence of the APOBEC signature at diagnosis is an independent prognostic factor for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that high levels of APOBEC3B gene expression at diagnosis may also have a prognostic impact in myeloma. To consider APOBEC3B as a potential target for therapy more studies are necessary to understand how APOBEC3B expression is regulated and how APOBEC3B generates mutations. Methods: Gene expression profiling (GEP, U133 Plus 2.0) of MM patients was performed. APOBEC3B gene expression levels were investigated in plasma cells of healthy donors (HD; n=34), MGUS (n=154), smoldering myeloma (SMM; n=219), MM low risk (LR; n=739), MM high risk (HR; n=129), relapsed MM (RMM; n=74), and primary plasma cell leukemia (pPCL; n=19) samples. The samples from relapse were taken on or after the progression/relapse date but within 30 days after progression/relapse from Total Therapy trials 3, 4, 5 & 6. GEP70 score was used to separate samples into LR and HR groups. We also investigated APOBEC3B expression in different MM molecular subgroups and used logrank statistics with covariate frequency distribution to determine an optimal cut off APOBEC3B expression value. Gene expression was compared in cases with low expression of APOBEC3B (log2<7.5) and high expression of APOBEC3B (log2>10), and an optimal cut-point in APOBEC3B expression was identified with respect to PFS. To explore the role of MAF and the non-canonical NF-ĸB pathway we performed functional studies using a cellular model of MAF downregulation. TRIPZ lentiviral shRNA MAF knockdown in the RPMI8226 cell lines was used to explore MAF-dependent genes. NF-ĸB proteins, p52 and RelB, were investigated in the nuclear fraction by immunoblot analysis. Results: Expression of APOBEC3B in HD control samples (log2=10.9) was surprisingly higher than in MGUS (log2=9.51), SMM (log2=9.09), and LR (log2=9.40) and was comparable to HR (log2=10.4) and RMM (log2=10.6) groups. Expression levels of APOBEC3B were gradually increased as disease progressed from SMM to pPCL. The high expression of APOBEC3B in HD places plasma cells at risk of APOBEC induced mutagenesis where the regulation of APOBEC3B function is compromised. The correlation between APOBEC3B expression and GEP70 score in MM was 0.37, and there was a significant difference in APOBEC3B expression between GEP70 high and low risk groups (p=0.0003). An optimal cut-point in APOBEC3B expression of log2=10.2 resulted in a significant difference in PFS (median 5.7 yr vs.7.4 yr; p=0.0086) and OS (median 9.1 yr vs. not reached; p<0.0001), between high and low expression. The highest APOBEC3B expression was detected in cases with a t(14;16). We analyzed t(14;16) cases with the APOBEC mutational signature and compared them to t(14;16) cases without the APOBEC signature and found elevated MAF (2-fold) and APOBEC3B (2.7-fold) gene expression in samples with the APOBEC signature. No APOBEC signature was detected in SMM cases, including those with a t(14;16). High APOBEC3B levels in myeloma patients was associated with overexpression of genes related to response to DNA damage and cell cycle control. Significant (p<0.05) increases of NF-κB target genes was seen in high APOBEC3B cases: TNFAIP3 (4.4-fold), NFKB2 (1.7-fold), NFKBIE (1.9-fold), RELB (1.4-fold), NFKBIA (2.0-fold), PLEK (2.5-fold), MALT1 (2.5-fold), WNT10A (2.4-fold). However, in t(14;16) cases there was no significant increase of NF-κB target genes except BIRC3 (2.5-fold) and MALT1 (2.0-fold). MAF downregulation in RPMI8226 cells did not lead to changes in NF-κB target gene expression but MAF-dependent genes were identified, including ETS1, SPP1, RUNX2, HGF, IGFBP2 and IGFBP3. Analysis of nuclear fraction of NF-ĸB proteins did not show significant changes in expression of p52 and RelB in RPMI8226 cells after MAF downregulation. Conclusions: Increased expression of APOBEC3B is a negative prognostic factor in multiple myeloma. MAF is a major factor regulating expression of APOBEC3B in the t(14;16) subgroup. NF-ĸB pathway activation is most likely involved in upregulation of APOBEC3B in non-t(14;16) subgroups. Disclosures Davies: TRM Oncology: Honoraria; MMRF: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ASH: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1843-1843
Author(s):  
Holly Stessman ◽  
Linda B. Baughn ◽  
Aaron G. Sarver ◽  
Aatif Mansoor ◽  
Tzu G. Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 1843 The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib (Bz) has been used extensively and with much success in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) patients; however, patients eventually relapse, many as non-responders to subsequent treatments with Bz making drug resistance a significant problem. Here we utilized cell lines created using a iMycCa/Bcl-xL transgenic mouse model of MM (Cheung, et al. J Clin Invest (2004) 113: 1763) to identify 1) gene expression signatures of Bz response, 2) differences in gene expression between sensitive and resistant cell lines, and 3) cytogenetic abnormalities associated with Bz sensitive and resistant phenotypes. The iMycCa/Bcl-xL transgenic mice develop plasma cell tumors with 100% penetrance and have shown strikingly strong similarities to human MM by extensive gene expression profiling (GEP), spectral karyotyping and histology (Boylan, et al. Cancer Res (2007) 67: 4069). Six cell lines created from these mice were dose escalated with Bz over approximately six months to create Bz resistant (BzR) cell lines with approximately 5–8 fold increase in IC50 to Bz compared to their sensitive counterparts. The BzR characteristics were stable, as lines grown in the absence of drug for as long as 6 months maintained drug resistance upon subsequent challenge. Notably, BzR lines showed cross resistance to other investigational proteasome inhibitors (MLN9708 and carfilzomib) while maintaining sensitivity to other chemotherapeutic agents (dexamethasone and melphalan), suggesting a common mechanism of emerging resistance to proteasome inhibitors. The results of GEP of these mouse tumor cell lines treated with Bz were compared with a recently published human drug trial where GEP was completed prior to and 48 hours after a “test dose” of Bz was administered to patients (Shaughnessy, et al. Blood (2011), ahead of print). In the mouse tumor cell lines, 116 genes were differentially expressed upon in vitro Bz treatment (p=0.001, ≥1.5 fold change). Between the mouse and human drug response data sets was an overlapping common 27-gene signature (p=1×10−25, Fishers exact test) of Bz-induced expression changes that has not previously been described. Time points were collected in these mouse cell line GEP experiments at 0, 2, 8, 16, and 24 hours after Bz treatment. A comparison of the Bz sensitive and derived BzR lines prior to drug treatment revealed a 50 gene signature (p=0.05, ≥2 fold change) that distinguishes three pairs of sensitive and resistant lines. Gene-set enrichment analyses have revealed significant pathways that are differentially regulated in the sensitive and resistant responses. Additional GEP differences were seen when time course expression patterns were examined from Bz sensitive compared to resistant tumor lines. Thus, GEP signatures that distinguish tumor lethality from resistance were identified both prior to Bz treatment, as well as in the early response to Bz. In addition, array comparative genomic hybridization on 4 pairs of mouse Bz sensitive and established BzR lines revealed not only gross differences in copy number between the differentially responding groups of cells but copy number abnormalities that may be unique to the emerging resistance. Taken together, these data indicate that this model is useful for the identification of good and poor Bz response signatures in MM. These signatures are currently being evaluated in human tumor cells from single agent bortezomib phase II and phase III clinical trials. Because the in vitro adapted tumor mouse lines can be genetically manipulated using lentiviral vectors, this model can be used as a preclinical platform to validate existing gene models with respect to Bz response, something that cannot be done using human patients. Subsequent transfer of manipulated lines into syngeneic, immunocompetent recipients can further test Bz response in vivo presenting a significant advantage of this robust mouse MM model system over other in vitro systems. Disclosures: Stessman: Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Mansoor:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Janz:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding. Van Ness:Millennium: The Takeda Oncology Company: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 323-323
Author(s):  
Paola Neri ◽  
Kathy Gratton ◽  
Li Ren ◽  
Jordan Johnson ◽  
Jiri Slaby ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 323 Background: miRNAs are non-coding small RNAs that modulate protein expression at the post-transcriptional level and are implicated in the pathogenesis of a variety of cancers. In Multiple Myeloma (MM) a global elevation of miRNAs was previously correlated with poor disease outcomes and response to therapy. Using miRNome profiling of MM patients, we have recently established a miRNA-based risk score that is predictive of response to lenalidomide (Neri P, Blood 2011). In particular, we identified significant upregulation of miR-30 family members (a, b, c and e) in lenalidomide resistant patients. In the present study, we evaluated the biological functions of miR-30e in MM and its role in plasma cells resistance to lenalidomide as well as other anti-MM therapeutics. Methods and Results: Microarray profiling (Affymetrix miRNA GeneChip) of total RNA extracted from bone marrow plasma cells from lenalidomide sensitive and resistant MM patients (n=40), coupled with quantitative short stem-loop PCR (TaqMan, Applied Biosystems), confirmed the upregulation of miR-30e in lenalidomide resistant patients. Functionally, we sought to determine if overexpression of miR-30e would modify MM cells sensitivity to lenalidomide and bortezomib. Lentiviral-mediated stable expression (pLKO.1 retroviral plasmid) of miR-30e, and relative to empty vector (EV), significant increased MM1S and OPM2 cells growth (1.3 fold) as determined by MTT assay. In addition, miR-30e overexpressing cells (MM1S-30e and OPM2-30e vs MM1-EV and OPM2-EV) were more resistant to the cytotoxic effects of lenalidomide as well as bortezomib with approximately 15 to 20% reduction in cells death (Annexin V staining and MTT assay). Computational target prediction analysis (TargetScan 6.0 and miRanda) identified CRBN and BLIMP1 as potential target of miR-30e with a miRNA seed region that matches 8 or 7mer sites within Cereblon and BLIMP1 3'UTR regions. In a panel of MM cell lines (MM1S, OPM2, H929, INA-6, U266, 8226, KMS11) CRBN mRNA levels were indeed inversely correlated with miR-30e and stable mir-30e overexpression significantly reduced CRBN mRNA in these cells (MM1S-30e and OPM2-30e). In addition to CRBN, BLIMP1 mRNA and protein levels were also reduced in miR-30e overexpressing cells. In plasma cells, BLIMP1 drives XBP1 expression while supressing c-myc. In MM1S-30e and OPM2-30e (relative to empty vector), and consistent with their reduced BLIMP1 expression, XBP1 mRNA and protein levels were reduced. Furthermore, treatment with lenalidomide (10μM) significantly reduced c-MYC protein levels in MM1S-EV cells after 4 hours while it had no effect on C-MYC expression in MM1S-30e cells. Conclusions: miR-30e is overexpressed in resistant MM cells and is here shown to regulate cereblon expression, plasma cells differentiation axis (BLIMP1, XBP1) and cell growth (c-MYC). Disclosures: Neri: Johnson ans Johnson: Research Funding. Bahlis:Johnson and Johnson: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1907-1907
Author(s):  
Eva Sahakian ◽  
Jason B. Brayer ◽  
John Powers ◽  
Mark Meads ◽  
Allison Distler ◽  
...  

Abstract The role of HDACs in cellular biology, initially limited to their effects upon histones, is now appreciated to encompass more complex regulatory functions that are dependent on their tissue expression, cellular compartment distribution, and the stage of cellular differentiation. Recently, our group has demonstrated that the newest member of the HDAC family of enzymes, HDAC11, is an important regulator of IL-10 gene expression in myeloid cells (Villagra A Nat Immunol. 2009). The role of this specific HDAC in B-cell development and differentiation is however unknown. To answer this question, we have utilized a HDAC11 promoter-driven eGFP reporter transgenic mice (TgHDAC11-eGFP) which allows the monitoring of the dynamic changes in HDAC11 gene expression/promoter activity in B-cells at different maturation stages (Heinz, N Nat. Rev. Neuroscience 2001). First, common lymphoid progenitors are devoid of HDAC11 transcriptional activation as indicated by eGFP expression. In the bone marrow, expression of eGFP moderately increases in Pro-B-cells and transitions to the Pre- and Immature B-cells respectively. Expression of eGFP doubles in the B-1 stage of differentiation in the periphery. Of note, examination of both the bone marrow and peripheral blood plasma cell compartment demonstrated increased expression of eGFP/HDAC11 mRNA at the steady-state. These results were confirmed in plasma cells isolated from normal human subjects in which HDAC11 mRNA expression was demonstrated. Strikingly, analysis of primary human multiple myeloma cells demonstrated a significantly higher HDAC11 mRNA expression in malignant cells as compared to normal plasma cells. Similar results were observed in 4/5 myeloma cell lines suggesting that perhaps HDAC11 expression might provide survival advantage to malignant plasma cells. Support to this hypothesis was further provided by studies in HDAC11KO mice in which we observed a 50% decrease in plasma cells in both the bone marrow and peripheral blood plasma cell compartments relative to wild-type mice. Taken together, we have unveiled a previously unknown role for HDAC11 in plasma cell differentiation and survival. The additional demonstration that HDAC11 is overexpressed in primary human myeloma cells provide the framework for specifically targeting this HDAC in multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Alsina: Millennium: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Baz:Celgene Corporation: Research Funding; Millenium: Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 1194-1194
Author(s):  
Philipp Sergeev ◽  
Sadiksha Adhikari ◽  
Juho J. Miettinen ◽  
Maiju-Emilia Huppunen ◽  
Minna Suvela ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Melphalan flufenamide (melflufen), is a novel peptide-drug conjugate that targets aminopeptidases and selectively delivers alkylating agents in tumors. Melflufen was recently FDA approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Considering the challenges in treating this group of patients, and the availability of several new drugs for MM, information that can support treatment selection is urgently needed. To identify potential indicators of response and mechanism of resistance to melflufen, we applied a multiparametric drug sensitivity assay to MM patient samples ex vivo and analyzed the samples by single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq). Ex vivo drug testing identified MM samples that were distinctly sensitive or resistant to melflufen, while differential gene expression analysis revealed pathways associated with response. Methods Bone marrow (BM) aspirates from 24 MM patients were obtained after written informed consent following approved protocols in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. BM mononuclear cells from 12 newly diagnosed (ND) and 12 relapsed/refractory (RR) patients were used for multi-parametric flow cytometry-based drug sensitivity and resistance testing (DSRT) evaluation to melflufen and melphalan, and for scRNAseq. Based on the results from the DSRT tests and drug sensitivity scores (DSS), we divided the samples into three groups - high sensitivity (HS, DSS &gt; 40 (melflufen) or DSS &gt; 16 (melphalan)), intermediate sensitivity (IS, 31 ≤ DSS ≤ 40 (melflufen) or 10 ≤ DSS ≤ 16 (melphalan)), and low sensitivity (LS, DSS &lt; 31 (melflufen) or DSS &lt; 10 (melphalan)). To identify genes, responsible for the general sensitivity to melphalan-based drugs we conducted differential gene expression (DGE) analyses separately for melphalan and melflufen focusing on the plasma cell populations, comparing gene expression between HS and LS samples for both drugs ("HS vs. LS melphalan" and "HS vs. LS for melflufen", respectively). In addition, to explain the increased sensitivity of RR samples, we conducted the DGE analysis for ND vs. RR samples and searched for similarities between these three datasets. Results DSRT data indicated that samples from RRMM patients were significantly more sensitive to melflufen compared to samples from NDMM (Fig. 1A). In addition, we observed that samples with a gain of 1q (+1q) were more sensitive to melflufen while those with deletion of 13q (del13q) appeared to be less sensitive, although these results lacked significance (Fig. 1A). After separating the samples into different drug sensitivity groups (HS, IS, LS), DGE analysis showed significant downregulation of the drug efflux and multidrug resistance protein family member ABCB9 in the melflufen HS group opposed to the LS group (2.2-fold, p &lt; 0.001). A similar pattern was detected for the melphalan HS vs. LS comparison suggesting that this alteration might be a common indicator of sensitivity to melphalan-based drugs. Furthermore, in the melflufen HS group we observed downregulation of the matrix metallopeptidase inhibitors TIMP1 and TIMP2 (3-fold and 1.6-fold, p &lt; 0.001, respectively), and cathepsin inhibitors CST3 and CSTB (3.2-fold and 1.3-fold, p &lt; 0.001, respectively) (Fig. 1B). This effect was observed in both "ND vs. RR" and "HS vs. LS for melflufen" comparisons, but not for melphalan, suggesting that these changes are associated with disease progression and specific indicators of sensitivity to melflufen. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed activation of pathways related to protein synthesis, as well as amino acid starvation for malignant and normal cell populations in the HS group. Conclusion In summary, our results indicate that melflufen is more active in RRMM compared to NDMM. In addition, samples from MM patients with +1q, which is considered an indicator of high-risk disease, tended to be more sensitive to melflufen. Based on differential GSEA and pathway enrichment, several synergizing mechanisms could potentially explain the higher sensitivity to melflufen, such as decreased drug efflux and increased drug uptake. Although these results indicate potential indicators of response and mechanisms of drug efficacy, further validation of these findings is required using data from melflufen treated patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Slipicevic: Oncopeptides AB: Current Employment. Nupponen: Oncopeptides AB: Consultancy. Lehmann: Oncopeptides AB: Current Employment. Heckman: Orion Pharma: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Celgene/BMS: Research Funding; Kronos Bio, Inc.: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4370-4370
Author(s):  
Michael J Mason ◽  
Carolina D. Schinke ◽  
Christine Eng ◽  
Fadi Towfic ◽  
Fred Gruber ◽  
...  

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy of terminally differentiated plasma cells residing within the bone marrow with 25,000-30,000 patients diagnosed in the United States each year. The disease's clinical course depends on a complex interplay chromosomal abnormalities and mutations within plasma cells and patient socio-demographic factors. Novel treatments extended the time to disease progression and overall survival for the majority of patients. However, a subset of 15%-20% of MM patients exhibit an aggressive disease course with rapid disease progression and poor overall survival regardless of treatment. Accurately predicting which patients are at high-risk is critical to designing studies with a better understanding of myeloma progression and enabling the discovery of novel therapeutics that extend the progression free period of these patients. To date, most MM risk models use patient demographic data, clinical laboratory results and cytogenetic assays to predict clinical outcome. High-risk associated cytogenetic alterations include deletion of 17p or gain of 1q as well as t(14;16), t(14;20), and most commonly t(4,14), which leads to juxtaposition of MMSET with the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus promoter, resulting in overexpression of the MMSET oncogene. While cytogenetic assays, in particular fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), are widely available, their risk prediction is sub-optimal and recently developed gene expression based classifiers predict more accurately rapid progression. To investigate possible improvements to models of myeloma risk, we organized the Multiple Myeloma DREAM Challenge, focusing on predicting high-risk, defined as disease progression or death prior to 18 months from diagnosis. This effort combined 4 discovery datasets providing participants with clinical, cytogenetic, demographic and gene expression data to facilitate model development while retaining 4 additional datasets, whose clinical outcome was not publicly available, in order to benchmark submitted models. This crowd-sourced effort resulted in the unbiased assessment of 171 predictive algorithms on the validation dataset (N = 823 unique patient samples). Analysis of top performing methods identified high expression of PHF19, a histone methyltransferase, as the gene most strongly associated with disease progression, showing greater predictive power than the expression level of the putative high-risk gene MMSET. We show that a simple 4 feature model composed of age, stage and the gene expression of PHF19 and MMSET is as accurate as much larger published models composed of over 50 genes combined with ISS and age. Results from this work suggest that combination of gene expression and clinical data increases accuracy of high risk models which would improve patient selection in the clinic. Disclosures Towfic: Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dalton:MILLENNIUM PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.: Honoraria. Goldschmidt:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Chugai: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Molecular Partners: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Sanofi: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnology: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dietmar-Hopp-Stiftung: Research Funding; John-Hopkins University: Research Funding. Avet-Loiseau:takeda: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding; celgene: Consultancy, Other: travel fees, lecture fees, Research Funding. Ortiz:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Trotter:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dervan:Celgene: Employment. Flynt:Celgene Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Dai:M2Gen: Employment. Bassett:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sonneveld:SkylineDx: Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Shain:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; AbbVie: Research Funding; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Sanofi Genzyme: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy. Munshi:Abbvie: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy; Oncopep: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Adaptive: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy. Morgan:Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene Corporation, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene Corporation, Janssen: Research Funding; Amgen, Janssen, Takeda, Celgene Corporation: Other: Travel expenses. Walker:Celgene: Research Funding. Thakurta:Celgene: Employment, Equity Ownership.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document