Polymorphisms in TNFA and CTLA-4 Genes and the Risk of Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3414-3414
Author(s):  
Dorothee Leroux ◽  
Claire Pouplard ◽  
Benoit Guillet ◽  
Beatrice Cosne ◽  
Marc Antoine May ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Rflp Analysis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
High Doses

Abstract Backgroud and objectives: The formation of antibodies (Abs) to heparin platelet factor 4 complexes (H/PF4) associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a T-helper cell dependent event that involves antigen presenting cells (APC) and B-lymphocytes. Polymorphisms of the CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4) gene have been described as a risk factor in several autoimmune diseases. In addition, TNFα is a major inflammatory cytokine with potent regulatory functions and polymorphisms in TNFA have also been associated with autoimmune antibody-mediated diseases. We therefore evaluated the possibility that an association between polymorphisms in CTLA-4 (−318 C/T and +49 A/G) or TNFA (−308 G/A) and the development of Abs to H/PF4 and HIT might exist. Methods: Eighty-three patients identified as having developed definite HIT with significant levels of Abs to PVS/PF4 in ELISA (HAT 45, GTI, Brookfield, WI, USA) and positive serotonin release assay were studied (HIT group). Two control groups were studied: the Abneg group consisted of 83 patients who had undergone heart surgery with high doses of unfractionated heparin administered during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and who were tested negative for Abs to PVS/PF4 at the 8th post operative day. The Abpos group consisted of 58 patients who had also undergone CPB but had developed high levels of Abs to PVS/PF4 without significant change in the platelet count post-operatively. Three single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), one in TNFA (−308G/A) and two in CTLA-4 (−318 C/T and +49A/G) were studied by conventional RFLP analysis as described (Astermark et al, Blood 2006 and Astermark et al, Thromb Haemost 2007). Results: The CTLA-4 +49 A/G and −318 C/T genotypes and allele distributions were similar in the 3 groups of patients (Table). In contrast, the frequency of TNFA –308 G/G homozygotes was higher in the HIT group compared to patients without HIT whether they had developed PF4-specific Abs or not (p=0.035). Therefore, the A allele was less frequent in HIT patients (p=0.026, OR 0.49; CI95% 0.26–0.93) but there was no significant difference when comparing patients with and without PF4-dependent antibodies. Genotype Allele frequency Ab neg (n = 82) Ab pos (n = 58) HIT (n = 82) CTLA-4(+49) A/A 31 (38%) 24 (41%) 35 (43%) A/G 40 (49%) 26 (45%) 41 (50%) G/G 11 (13%) 8 (14%) 6 (7%) CTLA-4(−318) C/C 63 (77%) 49 (84%) 67 (82%) C/T 19 (23%) 9 (16%) 17 (21%) T/T 0 0 0 (0%) TNFα(−308) G/G 59 (72%) 41 (71%) 68 (84%) G/A 20 (24%) 15 (26%) 12 (15%) A/A 3 (4%) 2 (3%) 1 (1%) A Allele 0.160 0.160 0.09 G Allele 0.840 0.840 0.910 Conclusion: The TNFA –308 A allele appears to be protective regarding the risk of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients having developed PF4-specific antibodies. A similar effect has been suggested in immune thrombocytopenic purpura (Foster et al, Brit J Haematol 2001) despite individuals with this allele have been identified as high TNFα producers. Therefore, the mechanisms involved for explaining this apparent protective effect of the TNFA −308A allele in patients at risk for HIT have to be identified.

Diagnosis and treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Perfusion ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J DeBois ◽  
Junli Liu ◽  
Leonard Y Lee ◽  
Leonard N Girardi ◽  
Charles Mack ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Platelet Inhibition ◽  
Heparin Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Antibody Detection ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitor ◽  
Heparin Infusion ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major side effect secondary to the administration of heparin. This syndrome is serious and potentially life threatening. This response is the result of antibodies formed against the platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complex. The incidence of this immune-mediated syndrome has been estimated to be 1-3% of all patients receiving heparin therapy. The occurrence of HIT in patients requiring full anticoagulation for cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), therefore, presents a serious challenge to the cardiac surgery team. The diagnosis of HIT should be based on both clinical and laboratory evidence. While functional assays, platelet aggregation tests, and the serotonin release assay can be used to support the diagnosis, the negative predictive value of these tests is generally less than 50%. In contrast, although non-functional antibody detection assays are more sensitive, they have a low specificity. HIT can be treated in several ways, including cessation of all heparin and giving an alternative thrombin inhibitor, platelet inhibition followed by heparin infusion, and the use of low molecular weight heparins. In this presentation, the pathology and current diagnostic tests, as well as the successful management of patients with HIT undergoing CPB at New York Presbyterian Hospital, are reviewed.

Investigations of the Immunoglobulin Subtype Transformation of Anti–Heparin-Platelet Factor 4 Antibodies During Treatment With a Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin (Clivarin) in Orthopedic Patients

2003 ◽  
Vol 127 (5) ◽  
pp. 584-588
Author(s):  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
H. Peter Bacher ◽  
Michael R. Lassen ◽  
Debra A. Hoppensteadt ◽  
Helen Leitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Molecular Weight ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparin ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Antibody Titers ◽  
Orthopedic Patients

Abstract Context.—It is now widely accepted that the pathophysiology of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) syndrome is mediated by the generation of a wide array of functional and molecularly heterogeneous anti–heparin-platelet factor 4 (AHPF4) antibodies that may mediate platelet and/or endothelial cell activation/destruction. Objective.—We investigated the differential prevalence and functionality of AHPF4 immunoglobulin subtypes (IgA, IgG, and IgM) in plasmas obtained from orthopedic patients immobilized with Plaster-Cast and treated with clivarin (a low-molecular-weight heparin) in comparison to a placebo for the prophylaxis of deep-vein thrombosis. Design and Methods.—Clivarin was administered subcutaneously at a fixed daily dosage of 1750 U without any adjustment or loading dosage. Citrated plasmas were obtained at baseline, at 10 to 14 days, and at postbrace procedure (5–12 weeks). An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to quantitate the AHPF4 antibody titers. The functionality of the ELISA-positive samples was determined by a 14C-serotonin release assay (SRA). Results.—In the ELISA test, 16 of 1073 samples (1.5%; 6 in clivarin and 10 in placebo groups) were positive for AHPF4 antibodies (mean optical density [OD] = 0.46 ± 0.02). None of the ELISA-positive samples for AHPF4 antibodies could mediate platelet activation responses as determined by the SRA (0%–3% serotonin release, P > .10, n = 16). Through differential immunoglobulin subtype analysis of the samples positive for (cumulative) AHPF4 antibodies, we determined that their relative prevalence in plasma were as follows: IgM (mean OD = 0.71 ± 0.13) > IgG (0.31 ± 0.08) > IgA (0.14 ± 0.02). Although there was no significant difference in the total antibody titers between clivarin and placebo groups, the antibody subtyping data showed conversion trends (ie, IgA [clivarin to placebo], IgG [placebo to clivarin], and IgM [clivarin to placebo]). Conclusion.—These observations indicate that even at reduced dosages, clivarin can shift the immunogenic up-regulation toward the IgG subpopulation; however, the IgG subtype is of a nonfunctional type of AHPF4 antibody and thus may not cause any HIT-related pathogenic responses.

Pathophysiology of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Platelet Factor 4 ◽  
Thrombin Inhibitors ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Cellular Activation ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
New Information ◽  
Study Selection ◽  
Release Assay

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.

Serologic Results in >1000 Patients With Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 410-414 ◽  
Author(s):  
Suresh G. Shelat ◽  
Anne Tomaski ◽  
Eleanor S. Pollak
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Diagnosis ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Release Assay ◽  
Pathogenic Antibodies

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) can lead to life-threatening and limb-threatening thrombosis. HIT is thought to be initiated by the interaction of pathogenic antibodies toward a complex platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin (PF4:H), which can activate platelets and predispose to thrombosis. As such, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT includes antigenic and functional assays to detect antibodies directed at PF4:H complexes. We performed a retrospective analysis of 1017 consecutive samples tested by serotonin-release assay and by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Most samples showed no serologic evidence of HIT, whereas 4% to 5% of samples demonstrated both antigenic and functional serological evidence for HIT. Approximately 12% to 18% of samples showed immunologic evidence of anti-PF4:H antibodies but without functional evidence of serotonin release in vitro. Interestingly, a small minority of samples (0.7%) caused serotonin release but were negative in the ELISA. The results are presented using cutoff values established at our hospital and for the ELISA manufacturer. This study provides a pretest probability of the serologic results from an antigenic assay (ELISA) and a functional assay (serotonin-release assay) in patients clinically suspected of having HIT.

scholarly journals P1510INCIDENCE AND OUTCOME HEMODIALYSIS PATIENCE WITH HEPARIN INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA - FOUR YEAR EXPERIENCE ZVEZDARA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Bulatovic ◽  
Vesna Maslarevic Radovic ◽  
Katarina Markovic ◽  
Petar Djuric ◽  
Jelena Tosic Dragovic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Unfractionated Heparin ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Elisa Test ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Heparin Administration ◽  
Alternative Anticoagulation ◽  
Patients At Risk ◽  
Clinical Scoring

Abstract Background and Aims Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a potentially fatal adverse reaction after administration of unfractionated or fractionated heparin, which underlies the generation of antibodies to the heparin complex and platelet factor 4 (PF4). It occurs in 5% of patients treated with unfractionated heparin and 0.5 - 1.5% fractionated heparin. The aim of the study is to determine the incidence and outcome of hemodialysis patients with HIT over 4 years period. Method Our retrospective study analyzed patients who were tested for evidence of positive anti-heparin antibody in the period from 2015 to 2019 in Zvezdara University Medical Center. The diagnosis was confirmed by the 4T clinical scoring system, a positive antiheparin-PF4 ELISA test and a positive platelet aggregation test with heparin. Results During observation period, total of 54 tests were performed on HIT suspected patients, out of which 21 patients were positive. Out of them, 14 patients were on HD, and other 7 (geriatric, surgery and cardiology departments) received therapy due to peripheral thrombosis, AIM or arrhythmia. All patients treated at nephrology, started hemodialysis (HD) with unfractionated heparin, while others were treated with LMWH. 4T scoring showed that 64% of patients had a moderate risk of developing HIT, while high risk was assessed in 36% of patients. Thrombotic complications in the form of deep venous thrombosis had 50% of patients, pulmonary thromboembolism had 11% of patients. The greatest decrease in Tr was most commonly observed between 10th and 14th day (61% of patients) and 39% from 4th to 10th day from start of heparin administration. In addition to heparin withdrawal and treatment with alternative nonheparin anticoagulation (fondaparinoux), 5 patients needed plasma treatment. 11 patients on HD were transferred to peritoneal dialysis (PD), and 2 patients recovered renal function. Overall mortality was 52%, while in nephrology patients was below 30%. Conclusion HIT should be considered in patients at risk. It is necessary to abolish heparin treatment and use alternative method (PD) or alternative anticoagulation. Hemodialysis patients have better prognosis than other comparable patients.

Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: A Rapid, Reliable and Practical, Functional Flow-Cytometric Assay

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1130-1130
Author(s):  
Varda Deutsch ◽  
Michal Cipok ◽  
Sigi Kay ◽  
Yvette Levy ◽  
Shoshana Bar On ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Conflicts Of Interest ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Relative Sensitivity ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Specific Test ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Laboratory Confirmation ◽  
Relative Specificity ◽  
Biological Probe

Abstract Background Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious complication of heparin treatment, associated with morbidity and mortality. HIT is characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombotic complications secondary to the formation of antibodies (Abs) against heparin-platelet-factor 4 (PF4) complexes. The pathologic mechanism involves the binding of the heparin-immune-complex to the platelet-Fc-receptor, resulting in platelet activation, aggregation, and rapid elimination. The diagnosis of HIT requires laboratory confirmation. Common laboratory testing is based on immune detection of antibodies directed against the PF4/heparin complex (ID-H/PF4-PaGIA or ELISA). However, these assays suffer from methodological limitations, especially low specificity, as compared to the platelet functional assays. The “gold standard” functional test for detecting of platelet-activating antibodies is the radioactive [14C] serotonin-release assay (14C-SRA) (Sheridan D, et al, Blood. 1986;67:27-30, Kelton JG, et al.,Blood.1988;72:925-30). However, the assay includes the use of a radiolabeled biological probe and requires considerable expertise to obtain reliable results. Consequently, its use is limited to research laboratories. Aim To overcome the methodological limitations associated with current assays, we modified a functional flow-cytometry assay (FCA), which exhibits high sensitivity and specificity (Tomer, A. Br J Haematol, 1997;98: 648-656 , Tomer, A., et al, Am J Hematol, 1999;61: 53-61). This assay, similar in concept to the 14C-SRA, determines the capacity of the patient's serum to activate platelets in the presence of heparin, using a fluorescent probe. Methods Consecutive samples from 254 patients clinically suspected for HIT were tested. The FCA assay was compared with the standard ID-H/PF4-PaGIA antigenic assay (DiaMed, Switzerland) with two dilutions to assess specificity (Nellen, V., et al.,Haematologica, 2012;97: 89-97). Results Of the total 254 samples tested, 48 (19%) were positive by PaGIA, compared to 13 (5.1%) positive by the functional FCA (Table 1). The number of PaGIA positive samples was reduced to 24 (9.4%) by 1:16 dilution, and to 14 (5.5%) by 1:32 dilution. All FCA positive samples were positive at all PaGIA dilutions (relative sensitivity 93%). Thirty PaGIA negative samples were all negative by the FCA (relative specificity 100%). Conclusion The results suggest that the functional FCA is a practical, sensitive, and highly specific test for the reliable diagnosis of HIT. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Comparison of an IgG-Specific Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Cutoff of 0.4 Versus 0.8 and 1.0 Optical Density Units for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 282-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brianne M. Ritchie ◽  
Jean M. Connors ◽  
Katelyn W. Sylvester
Keyword(s):  
Optical Density ◽  
Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Previous studies have demonstrated optimized diagnostic accuracy in utilizing higher antiheparin–platelet factor 4 (PF4) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) optical density (OD) thresholds for diagnosing heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We describe the incidence of positive serotonin release assay (SRA) results, as well as performance characteristics, for antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units in the diagnosis of HIT at our institution. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we conducted a single-center retrospective chart review on adult inpatients with a differential diagnosis of HIT evaluated by both antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA from 2012 to 2014. The major endpoints were to assess incidence of positive SRA results, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA values ≥0.4 OD units when compared to values ≥0.8 and ≥1.0 OD units. Clinical characteristics, including demographics, laboratory values, clinical and safety outcomes, length of stay, and mortality, were collected. Results: A total of 140 patients with 140 antiheparin–PF4 ELISA and SRA values were evaluated, of which 23 patients were SRA positive (16.4%) and 117 patients were SRA negative (83.6%). We identified a sensitivity of 91.3% versus 82.6% and 73.9%, specificity of 61.5% versus 87.2% and 91.5%, PPV of 31.8% versus 55.9% and 63.0%, NPV of 97.3% versus 96.2% and 94.7%, and accuracy of 66.4% versus 86.4% and 88.6% at antiheparin–PF4 ELISA thresholds ≥0.4, ≥0.8, and ≥1.0 OD units, respectively. Conclusion: Our study suggests an increased antiheparin–PF4 ELISA threshold of 0.8 or 1.0 OD units enhances specificity, PPV, and accuracy while maintaining NPV with decreased sensitivity.

scholarly journals Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and cardiovascular surgery

Hematology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (1) ◽  
pp. 536-544
Author(s):  
Allyson M. Pishko ◽  
Adam Cuker
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Antiplatelet Agent ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Heparin Complexes ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
History Of ◽  
Postoperative Setting

Abstract Clinicians generally counsel patients with a history of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) to avoid heparin products lifelong. Although there are now many alternative (nonheparin) anticoagulants available, heparin avoidance remains challenging for cardiac surgery. Heparin is often preferred in the cardiac surgery setting based on the vast experience with the agent, ease of monitoring, and reversibility. To “clear” a patient with a history of HIT for cardiac surgery, hematologists must first confirm the diagnosis of HIT, which can be challenging due to the ubiquity of heparin exposure and frequency of thrombocytopenia in patients in the cardiac intensive care unit. Next, the “phase of HIT” (acute HIT, subacute HIT A/B, or remote HIT) should be established based on platelet count, immunoassay for antibodies to platelet factor 4/heparin complexes, and a functional assay (eg, serotonin release assay). As long as the HIT functional assay remains positive (acute HIT or subacute HIT A), cardiac surgery should be delayed if possible. If surgery cannot be delayed, an alternative anticoagulant (preferably bivalirudin) may be used. Alternatively, heparin may be used with either preoperative/intraoperative plasma exchange or together with a potent antiplatelet agent. The optimal strategy among these options is not known, and the choice depends on institutional experience and availability of alternative anticoagulants. In the later phases of HIT (subacute HIT B or remote HIT), brief intraoperative exposure to heparin followed by an alternative anticoagulant as needed in the postoperative setting is recommended.

scholarly journals Detection of Platelet-Activating Antibodies Associated with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 1226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brigitte Tardy ◽  
Thomas Lecompte ◽  
François Mullier ◽  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Claire Pouplard
Keyword(s):  
Platelet Activation ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Membrane Expression ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Strict Adherence ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Functional Assays ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a prothrombotic immune drug reaction caused by platelet-activating antibodies that in most instances recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4)/polyanion complexes. Platelet activation assays (i.e., functional assays) are more specific than immunoassays, since they are able to discern clinically relevant heparin-induced antibodies. All functional assays used for HIT diagnosis share the same principle, as they assess the ability of serum/plasma from suspected HIT patients to activate fresh platelets from healthy donors in the presence of several concentrations of heparin. Depending on the assay, donors’ platelets are stimulated either in whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), or in a buffer medium (washed platelets, WP). In addition, the activation endpoint studied varies from one assay to another: platelet aggregation, membrane expression of markers of platelet activation, release of platelet granules. Tests with WP are more sensitive and serotonin release assay (SRA) is considered to be the current gold standard, but functional assays suffer from certain limitations regarding their sensitivity, specificity, complexity, and/or accessibility. However, the strict adherence to adequate preanalytical conditions, the use of selected platelet donors and the inclusion of positive and negative controls in each run are key points that ensure their performances.

Does the Platelet Factor 4 (PF4) ELISA Correlate with the Clinical Diagnosis of Type II Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia?.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2179-2179
Author(s):  
Michael B. Streiff ◽  
Thomas S. Kickler ◽  
Edward G. Weir
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Serotonin Release ◽  
Admission Diagnosis ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Patient Age ◽  
Platelet Factor ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Patient Âgé

Type II heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated complication of heparin therapy that is associated with a consumptive thrombocytopenia and a high risk of thromboembolism. It is now known that antibodies associated with type II HIT recognize sites on PF4 when complexed with heparin. Due to technical challenges associated with the serotonin release assay, most clinicians rely on the PF4 ELISA to establish a laboratory diagnosis of HIT. However, it is unclear whether the ELISA has predictive value in identifying those patients who have clinically apparent disease and whether ELISA optical density (OD) measurements correlate with the development of thrombosis. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 103 sequential patients who tested positive for HIT by a commercial PF4 ELISA from 2000–2002. While blinded to ELISA OD values, we recorded patient age and gender, admission diagnosis, hospital course, type of heparin administered, route of administration, baseline and nadir platelet counts, timing of thrombocytopenia, HIT therapy, clinical thrombotic events within 30 days, and other potential causes of thrombocytopenia to determine the clinical likelihood of HIT. The association between OD values and both the clinical likelihood of HIT and objectively confirmed thrombotic events was analyzed using the Pearson Chi-square test. Median patient age was 62 yrs and 52% of patients were female. Those with cardiac disease, cancer, and venous thromboembolism constituted 44%, 19% and 9% of the study population, respectively. Median platelet count nadir was 40K/mL (range, 2K–90K), and average onset of thrombocytopenia was 6.5 days. Median ELISA OD value was 0.77 (0.40–3.81). The clinical likelihood of HIT was noted in 24/103(23%) patients, and 22(21%) suffered a thrombotic event. An ELISA OD >1.0 was significantly associated with the clinical likelihood of HIT (p=0.03), though OD values ranged from 0.41 to 3.81 among these patients. Neither an OD threshold of 1.0 or 1.5 was associated with thromboembolism (p=0.2 and p=0.1, respectively). In contrast, the clinical likelihood of HIT was significantly associated with subsequent thrombosis (p=0.002). ELISA results were not significantly associated with the extent or onset of thrombocytopenia, type of heparin or route administered, patient age or gender, admission diagnosis, or hospital course. In conclusion, PF4 ELISA OD values are significantly associated with the clinical likelihood of HIT but are not predictive of HIT on an individual patient basis. Clinical judgment but not ELISA OD values is associated with subsequent thromboembolism. In summary, the clinical likelihood of HIT, and not ELISA results, remains the best parameter by which to modify anticoagulation therapy in patients being assessed for HIT. Figure Figure

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document