Time Course of Venous Thromboembolism Events and Influence of Risk Factors in High Risk Medical Patients,

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4182-4182
Author(s):  
Russell D Hull ◽  
Tazmin Merali ◽  
Allan Mills ◽  
Jane Liang ◽  
Nelly Komari
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Real Life ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Abstract 4182 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been identified in clinical guidelines as an appropriate strategy for high-risk medical inpatients as it results in reduced VTE events and reduced mortality. However, real life data regarding the timing of VTE events and the relationship between risk factors and VTE in this population is lacking. Further knowledge of the time course of recurrence and influence of risk factors in actual practice may help clinicians determine strategies regarding the frequency of clinical surveillance and the appropriate duration of treatment. Objective: To document the time course of symptomatic VTE events in high-risk medical patients in every day clinical practice and to relate the frequency of risk factors to the likelihood of VTE development. Methods: Charts from 1134 consecutive high-risk medical patients who were hospitalized in the Calgary region and discharged between January and February 2008 were abstracted using standardized case record forms. All hospitals in the region use a common unique patient identifier number, thus enabling the tracking of subsequent patient visits to the emergency room, inpatient admissions or outpatient visits occurring anywhere in the region's acute care system. Any identified patient was followed for a subsequent visit related to VTE. High-risk medical patients were defined as age > 60 years and having at least one of the following risk factors: malignancy, respiratory illness, neurological illness, inflammatory bowel disease, previous VTE, acute infection or heart failure. Records were excluded if the patient was admitted for VTE or to rule out VTE, receiving chronic anticoagulation, experiencing acute coronary syndromes, had a hospital stay ≤ 3 days, was a surgical or orthopedic patient, or pregnant. Data was collected on the timing of VTE related events for up to 100 days post discharge. Results: A total of 989 patients met criteria over the review period. Seventy-four percent (732/989) of all patients received mechanical or pharmacological prophylaxis in hospital. Only 2% (95% CI, 1.6% to 3.6%) of all patients received anticoagulation prophylaxis at discharge. Twenty-one percent of patients in the population studied were identified as requiring medical care for symptoms associated with VTE. Confirmation of VTE by diagnostic testing occurred in 4% (95% CI, 2.7% to 5.2%) while the other 17% (95% CI, 15.0% to 19.8%) had diagnostic tests that were negative or inconclusive. The mean length of time to confirmed first VTE event was 33.5 days. Eighty percent of first events occurred by day 57 and 90% of first VTE events occurred by day 69 post hospital admission. Patients with more than 2 risk factors had a rate of confirmed symptomatic VTE events of 6.1%, increasing to 8.7% for those with more than 3 risk factors while only 2.9% of patients with 2 or less risk factors developed a confirmed VTE. (p=0.015) Conclusion: This study demonstrates that in a real life setting, 6% of those hospitalized medical patients with more than 2 risk factors would develop symptomatic VTE event confirmed by diagnostic testing, increasing to 8.7% for those with more than 3 pre-specified risk factors. The mean time to first VTE event of 33.5 days along with 80% of VTE events occurring by day 57 suggest that more consideration needs to be given to prolonged VTE prophylaxis in this high risk population. The frequency and timing of the VTE events coupled with the results of the EXCLAIM study suggest that this high risk population may benefit from prolonged thromboprophylaxis. Disclosures: Hull: LEO Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy. Merali:LEO Pharma: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Abbott: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Nycomed: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy. Mills:Pfizer: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Research Funding. Komari:sanofi-aventis: Employment.

Rate of Late Venous Thromboembolism Events In High-Risk Medical Patients

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 82-82
Author(s):  
Russell Hull ◽  
Duane Bates ◽  
Cynthia Brocklebank ◽  
Nelly Komari ◽  
Tazmin Merali
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Infection ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Respiratory Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Current Guidelines

Abstract Abstract 82 Background: Current guidelines recommend that venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis should be given to high-risk medical inpatients based on evidence of reduced VTE events and reduced mortality. However, current guidelines do not specify the appropriate length of VTE prophylaxis in this population, especially after discharge. The EXCLAIM study showed a 90 day VTE incidence of 4.2% in those patients who received enoxaparin for 10 days in the hospital, with 1.1% being symptomatic VTE. However, real world data is needed to understand the risk of VTE for this patient population after they are discharged from acute care and the prevalence of symptomatic VTE. Objective: To determine the incidence of late VTE events in high-risk medical patients in every day clinical practice and in the absence of systematic screening for VTE. Methods: Charts from 1134 consecutive high-risk medical patients who were hospitalized in the Calgary region and discharged between January and February 2008 were abstracted using standardized case record forms. All hospitals in the region use a common unique patient identifier number, thus enabling the tracking of subsequent patient visits to the emergency room, inpatient admissions or outpatient visits occurring anywhere in the region's acute care system. High-risk medical patients were defined as age > 60 years and having at least one of the following risk factors: malignancy, respiratory illness, neurological illness, inflammatory bowel disease, previous VTE, acute infection or heart failure. Records excluded were those of patients who were admitted for VTE or to rule out VTE, those receiving chronic anticoagulation, those with acute coronary syndromes, patients whose hospital stay was ≤ 3 days, surgical patients, orthopedic patients, and pregnant patients. Data was collected on patient risk factors, thromboprophylaxis received in hospital and at discharge, VTE related events for up to 100 days post discharge. Results: 989 patients met criteria over the review period. 74% (733/989) of all patients received mechanical or pharmacological prophylaxis in hospital: 28% (281) received unfractionated heparin, 28% (281) received LMWH and 4% (40) received mechanical prophylaxis and 13% (131) received a combination of modalities. The prevailing medical risk factors were malignancy (46%), respiratory illness (44%), neurological illness (15%), inflammatory bowel disease (6%), previous VTE (4%), acute infection (17%), heart failure (9%). Only 2% (95% CI, 1.6% to 3.6%) of all patients received anticoagulation prophylaxis at discharge. Twenty one percent of patients in the population studied received medical care for symptoms associated with VTE. Of these, 4% (95% CI, 2.7% to 5.2%) had confirmation of VTE by diagnostic testing while the other 17% (95% CI, 15.0% to 19.8%) had diagnostic tests that were negative or inconclusive. The mean length of time to confirmed VTE was 34.1 days post hospital admission. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that in a real life setting 21% of high-risk patients would develop symptoms of VTE requiring a health professional's attention with 4% having VTE confirmed by diagnostic testing. These events occurred despite prophylaxis in hospital and suggest that the risk of symptomatic VTE could be higher in real life compared to that reported in randomized clinical trials where patients are screened for asymptomatic VTE. These findings show that the prevalence of VTE warrants consideration of extended thromboprophylaxis in selected high-risk medical patients, as the benefits of extended prophylactic therapy may outweigh the risks in this population. Disclosures: Hull: sanofi-aventis Canada Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Brocklebank:sanofi-aventis Canada Inc: Honoraria; Bayer, Inc.: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria. Komari:sanofi-aventis Canada Inc: Employment. Merali:sanofi-aventis Canada Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Rate and Time Course of Thromboembolism Events in Cancer Patients

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4773-4773
Author(s):  
Russell D Hull ◽  
Tazmin Merali ◽  
Allan Mills ◽  
Jane Liang ◽  
Nelly Komari
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Case Record ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Active Cancer

Abstract Abstract 4773 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis has been recommended in clinical guidelines as an appropriate strategy for hospitalized cancer patients based on evidence of reduced VTE events and reduced mortality. However, current guidelines do not specify the appropriate length of VTE prophylaxis in this population. Real world data is needed to understand the prevalence of symptomatic and confirmed VTE for this patient population to help clinicians determine strategies regarding the appropriate duration of treatment. Objective: To document the incidence of symptomatic late VTE events in hospitalized patients who have active cancer. Methods: Charts from 1134 consecutive medical patients age > 60 years who were hospitalized in the Calgary region and discharged between January and February 2008 were abstracted using standardized case record forms. All hospitals in the region use a common unique patient identifier number, thus enabling the tracking of subsequent patient visits to the emergency room, inpatient admissions or outpatient visits occurring anywhere in the region's acute care system. Any identified patient was followed for a subsequent visit related to VTE. Active cancer patients were defined as those who have a cancer diagnosis at hospital admission and have a planned cancer surgery or receiving cancer treatment or were receiving palliative treatment or whose cancer treatment was not specified. Records were excluded if the patient was admitted for VTE or to rule out VTE, receiving chronic anticoagulation, experiencing acute coronary syndromes, had a hospital stay ≤ 3 days, had a remote cancer history, was a surgical or orthopedic patient, or pregnant. Data was collected on the timing of VTE related events for up to 100 days post discharge. Results: A total of 358 patients met criteria over the review period. Seventy-three percent (261/358) of all active cancer patients received mechanical or pharmacological prophylaxis in hospital. Twenty-three percent of these patients were identified as requiring medical care for symptoms associated with VTE. Confirmation of VTE by diagnostic testing occurred in 4.8% (95% CI, 2.6% to 7%) while the other 18% (95% CI, 14.0% to 22%) had diagnostic tests that were negative or inconclusive. The mean length of time to confirmed first VTE event was 38.2 days post admission. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that in a real life setting 23% of active cancer patients would develop symptoms of VTE requiring a health professional's attention with 4.8% having VTE confirmed by diagnostic testing. These events occurred despite thromboprophylaxis in hospital and suggest that the risk of symptomatic VTE could be higher in real life compared to that reported in randomized clinical trials where patients are screened for asymptomatic VTE. These findings show that the prevalence of VTE warrants consideration of extended thromboprophylaxis in active cancer patients, as the benefits of extended prophylactic therapy may outweigh the risks in this population. Disclosures: Hull: sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; LEO Pharma: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; Portola: Consultancy; Merck: Consultancy; Bayer: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy. Merali:sanofi-aventis: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Pfizer: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Abbott: Consultancy; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; LEO Pharma: Consultancy; Nycomed: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy. Mills:Pfizer: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Research Funding. Komari:sanofi-aventis: Employment.

The International Medical Prevention Registry on Venous Thromboembolism (IMPROVE): Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practices in Acutely Ill Medical Patients.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1762-1762 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor F. Tapson ◽  
Herve Decousus ◽  
Jean-Fran[ccedi]ois Bergmann ◽  
Beng H. Chong ◽  
James B. Froehlich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Median Length ◽  
Thromboembolism Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Elastic Stockings

Abstract Background Despite consensus group recommendations indicating that medical patients should receive appropriate venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis, prophylaxis practices remain poorly characterized. This analysis of IMPROVE, a prospective study of acutely ill medical patients, describes in-hospital prophylaxis practices prior to the publication of updated VTE prevention guidelines by the American College of Chest Physicians. Methods Patient recruitment began in July 2002. Patients ≥18 years old, and hospitalized for ≥3 days with an acute medical illness are enrolled consecutively. Exclusion criteria are: therapeutic antithrombotics/thrombolytics at admission; major surgery or trauma during 3 months prior to admission; and VTE treatment begun within 24 hours of admission. Results Data were from 4315 patients (32% from USA) enrolled up to 30 June 2004 in 37 hospitals in 11 countries (76% with 3-month follow-up data). Patients are 50% female, median (IQR) age 69 (50–80) years, median length of hospital stay 8 (5–14) days, median weight 68 (58–80) kg, and 40% were immobile for ≥3 days (median length of immobility 7 [4–14] days, including immobility immediately prior to admission). In-hospital VTE prophylaxis was received by 41% of patients (Table 1). Of patients with no risk factors (44%), one risk factor (40%), or ≥2 risk factors (16%), 25%, 49%, and 67% received prophylaxis, respectively. 12% of IMPROVE patients would have been eligible for inclusion in the MEDENOX study. Of these, only 52% received prophylaxis in hospital. Prophylaxis was provided to 6% of patients during the 3-month follow-up period, and continued in 11% of patients after discharge. Conclusions Only 41% of IMPROVE patients received VTE prophylaxis, with considerable variation in types and regimens of prophylaxis used. While MEDENOX showed the benefits of VTE prophylaxis (enoxaparin 40 mg) in acutely ill medical patients, only half of MEDENOX-eligible patients received prophylaxis. Table 1. Use of in-hospital VTE prophylaxis (N=4315) VTE prophylaxis Patients receiving VTE prophylaxis, % ROW, rest of world; *Excluding elastic stockings and aspirin ≥1 type of VTE prophylaxis* 41 LMWH - USA (Q12h, Qd) 7 (5, 1) LMWH- ROW (Q12h, Qd) 31 (29, 2) UFH - USA (Q12h, Q8h) 28 (15, 11) UFH - ROW (Q12h, Q8h) 6 (5, 0) Intermittent pneumatic compression (USA, ROW) 6 (19, 0) Aspirin (USA, ROW) 4 (7, 3) Elastic stockings (USA, ROW) 6 (3, 8)

scholarly journals Risk assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients: Results of the regional multicenter study

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-40
Author(s):  
A. B. Sugraliyev ◽  
Sh. S. Aktayeva ◽  
Sh. B. Zhangelova ◽  
S. A. Shiller ◽  
Zh. M. Kussymzhanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health issue that is frequently underestimated. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to identify patients at risk for VTE, and to define the rate of patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis in the regions of Kazakhstan.Materials and methods. Standardized case report forms were filled by trained medical doctors on one predefined day in selected hospitals. Data were analyzed by independent biostatistician. Risk of VTE was categorized according to Caprini score which was recommended by 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines.Results. 432 patients from 4 regions of Kazakhstan; 169 (39.10%) medical patients and 263 (60.9%) surgical patients were eligible for the study. Patients were at low (10%), moderate (19.2%), high (33.6%) and very high risk (37.3%) for VTE. The main risk factors (RF) of VTE among hospitalized patients were heart failure (HF), obesity, prolonged bed rest, and the presence of acute non-infective inflammation. From total number of hospitalized patients with RF with indications to VTE prophylaxis, 58.1% of patients received pharmacological prophylaxis and only 24.6% of them received VTE prophylaxis according ACCP. On the other hand, 23.5% patients with the risk of VTE but who were not eligible for it received pharmacological prophylaxis.Conclusion. These results indicate the existence of inconsistency between eligibility for VTE prophylaxis on one hand and its application in practice (p < 0.001). Risk factors for VTE and eligibility for VTE prophylaxis are common, but VTE prophylaxis and guidelines application are low.

scholarly journals Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Acute Medically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3678-3678
Author(s):  
Anat Gafter-Gvili ◽  
Genady Drozdinsky ◽  
Oren Zusman ◽  
Shiri Kushnir ◽  
Leonard Leibovici
Keyword(s):  
Internal Medicine ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Pharmacologic Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill Patients

Background and Aims Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is considered as a preventable cause of death for hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend pharmacologic prophylaxis for medical patients considered high risk for VTE, despite failure of studies to show reduction in mortality. We aimed to assess the benefit and safety of VTE prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards. Methods Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to the internal medicine and acute geriatric departments, with an admission lasting more than 48 hours, during 2012-2018. Patients who received pharmacologic prophylaxis were compared to those who did not. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were the 90 day incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE), symptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and major bleeding. Propensity-weighted logistic multivariable analysis was performed. Results A total of 18890 patient-unique episodes were included in the analysis. Of them 3206 (17%) received prophylaxis. A total of 1309 (6.9%) died. 540/1309 (41.3%) of those who received VTE prophylaxis died and 769/1309 (58.7%) of those who did not receive prophylaxis died. VTE Prophylaxis was not associated with a reduction in mortality, multivariate-adjusted OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.84-1.14). One hundred and forty two patients (0.7%) developed VTE. The frequency of VTE among patients who received VTE prophylaxis was 31% (44/142) compared with 69% (98/142) in patients who did not receive prophylaxis. The frequency of VTE in patients who had a Padua score ≥4 and received VTE prophylaxis, was 1.9% (30/1573) compared with 1.6% (44/2797) in those with a Padua score ≥4 who did not receive prophylaxis. 74/142 (52.1%) of patients with VTE had a Padua score ≥4, 44/1309 (1.4%) of those who received VTE prophylaxis and 98/15864 (0.6%) of those who did not. VTE Prophylaxis was not associated with reduction in VTE in the whole cohort, multivariable-adjusted OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.52-2.29). VTE prophylaxis was associated with an increase in major bleeding (multivariable-adjusted OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.04-1.48) Conclusion The current practice of routinely administering VTE prophylaxis to medically ill patients considered at high risk for VTE, resulted in a high risk for bleeding a without clear clinical benefit, and should be reassessed. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract 18572: Sleep Duration is Associated with Degree of Insulin Resistance in a High Risk Population: the Baptist Employee Healthy Heart Study

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shozab S Ali ◽  
Ebenezer Oni ◽  
Ehimen C Aneni ◽  
Lara Roberson ◽  
Janisse Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cholesterol Level ◽  
Sleep Duration ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Risk Population ◽  
Heart Study ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome, the clustering of multiple cardiovascular risk factors, is established as a risk factor for CVD. Shorter or longer sleep duration has been reported to be associated with increased risk of metabolic syndrome (MS) and diabetes mellitus (DM) through increased insulin resistance (IR). However, it is not known if impaired sleep alters IR in a high-risk population with known MS/DM. Methods: The Baptist Employee Healthy Heart Study is an ongoing lifestyle intervention study examining the effects of web-based interventions on reducing CVD risk in individuals with MS/DM. Sleep duration was self reported by the participants. Daily sleep duration was categorized into sleep <7 hours (short), 7 to 8 hours (normal) and >8 hours (long). Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated from fasting insulin and fasting glucose level. Results: The population consisted of 182 participants (74% women, 49% Hispanic, mean age 52 ± 9 years). In this study the mean sleep duration was 7±5 hours and mean HOMA-IR was 5.2 ± 5.6 units. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, BMI, waist circumference, total cholesterol level and LDL cholesterol level did not apparently differ across the groups. Both short and long sleepers tended to have lower HDL cholesterol level and higher triglyceride level (p<0.05). The mean HOMA-IR was significantly higher in short and long sleepers {7-8hrs (4.09±4.8); <7hrs (5.36±4.7); >8hrs (9.52±10.7), p<0.001}, and were more likely to have HOMA-IR in the highest quartile as compared to normal sleepers. In ordinal logistic regression, after adjustment for traditional risk factors, short and long sleepers were at 2-3 fold higher risk of increasing levels of HOMA-IR. Conclusions: In this study of high metabolic risk individuals, sleep duration was associated with increased insulin resistance and highlights the importance of improving sleep hygiene in the clinical management of high risk individuals with MS and DM.

Identification of Medical Patients Who Should Receive Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1786-1786
Author(s):  
Alexander T. Cohen ◽  
Raza Alikhan ◽  
Juan I. Arcelus ◽  
Jean-François Bergmann ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Strong Evidence ◽  
Medical Patient ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Related Factors ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
History Of

Abstract Introduction Despite various medical illnesses/conditions and patient-related factors known to increase venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in medical patients, there is no worldwide consensus regarding which of these patients should receive VTE prophylaxis. As a result, many medical patients remain at risk from this potentially fatal disease. Our objective was to develop a simple risk assessment model (RAM) that could be used at the bedside to identify medical patients who should receive prophylaxis. Methods Acute medical illnesses/conditions and risk factors were included in the RAM if there was strong evidence from prospective clinical studies to show that they significantly increase VTE risk in medical patients, or VTE prophylaxis was beneficial in these cases. If strong evidence was not available, the illness/condition or factor was only included if there was consensus from the authors that VTE prophylaxis is beneficial for these patients. Results Table 1 shows acute medical illnesses/conditions and factors associated with significant VTE risk that are included in the RAM. If a medical patient is >40 years old with an acute medical illness and reduced mobility and has one of the illnesses/conditions or factors shown in Table 1, the RAM recommends prophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH: enoxaparin 40 mg o.d. or dalteparin 5000 IU o.d.) or unfractionated heparin (5000 IU q8h). LMWH is preferred due to a better safety profile. If pharmacologic prophylaxis is contraindicated, mechanical prophylaxis is recommended. Conclusion Acute medical illnesses/conditions and patient-related factors that increase the risk for VTE in medical patients have been identified and used to develop a novel RAM. The RAM is evidence-based wherever possible, and can be easily revised as new evidence becomes available. The RAM is simple in design, and can assist physicians to assess whether VTE prophylaxis is warranted in an individual medical patient. Table 1. Factors that increase the risk of VTE in medical patients Acute medical illnesses/conditions Risk factors *Note: The risk of hemorrhagic transformation should be assessed before giving VTE prophylaxis. Evidence-based: Acute MI, acute heart failure (NYHA III/IV), active cancer requiring therapy, severe infection/sepsis, respiratory disease (respiratory failure with/without mechanical ventilation, exacerbation of chronic respiratory disease), rheumatic disease (including acute arthritis of lower extremities, and vertebral compression), ischemic stroke*, paraplegia Consensus view only: Inflammatory disorder with immobility, inflammatory bowel disease Evidence-based: History of VTE, history of malignancy, concurrent acute infectious disease, age >75 years Consensus-based from strong evidence in other settings: Prolonged immobility, age >60 years, varicose veins, obesity, hormone therapy, pregnancy/postpartum, nephrotic syndrome, dehydration, thrombophilia, thrombocytosis

Venous Thromboembolism Validation Study of the IMPROVE Risk Assessment Models in the Medical Patient (VTE-VALOURR),

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 4218-4218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Edward Mahan ◽  
Yang Liu ◽  
James D. Douketis ◽  
Alexander G.G. Turpie ◽  
Undaleeb Dairkee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Validation Study ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Control Cohort ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Risk Assessment Models

Abstract Abstract 4218 Introduction. Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) remains the most common cause of preventable death in hospitalized patients despite more than 25 guidelines and over 5 decades of data on VTE prevention. American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and International Union of Angiology (IUA) guideline recommendations are primarily based off of risk factors utilized for entry into randomized controlled trials (RCT) or post-hoc analysis of these RCTs. These guidelines recommend a group-based, as opposed to an individualized risk assessment, approach. It is currently unknown how these risk factors interact in a quantitative manner. There are currently no weighted, validated, VTE risk assessment models (RAM) that are data-derived in medical patients. A retrospective VTE RAM (IMPACT ILL) was recently derived from the multinational IMPROVE registry in hospitalized medical patients. (Table 1) The “VTE-VALOURR ” is a retrospective, multi-center, case control, validation study of this RAM. The VTE-VALOURR is also assessing other VTE and bleeding risk factors. Methods. ICD-10 reports and the McMaster Transfusion Registry for Utilization Surveillance and Tracking (TRUST) database, which contains demographics, transfusion data, and approximately 50 clinical variables including thrombotic outcomes of inpatients, were used as the data source at 3 hospitals. Inclusion criteria were hospitalized medical patients ≥ 18 years with ≥ 3 days length of stay (LOS). Exclusion criteria were patients with pregnancy, mental health disorders, atrial fibrillation/ flutter, trauma, spinal cord injury, surgery within 90 days, VTE within 24 hours of admission, treatment dose anticoagulants (including warfarin) within 48 hours of admission, or transferred from a non-McMaster acute care facility. Lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism out to 90 days post admission were the thrombotic outcomes of interest and verified by chart review. Upper extremity DVT was excluded. Descriptive statistics (proportions and frequencies) were used to summarize binary variables. Results. From January 1st, 2005 to February 28th, 2011, 247,241 hospitalizations occurred at 3 McMaster hospitals. After exclusionary criteria were applied, 779 VTE events were identified. (Figure 1) Of these, 419 were excluded because they were VTE events not related to a previous hospitalization (i.e. community-acquired). Of the remaining 360 patients, 240 have been reviewed with 93 confirmed, included, VTE events having occurred, 147 events being further excluded, and another 120 patients still requiring review. We present an interim analysis of the 93 currently included patients. Of the included patients, 68 (73%) received some form of prophylaxis during their hospital stay while 35 (38%) received appropriate type, dose and duration of prophylaxis. Fifty-eight (62%) of VTE events were therefore “preventable.” Number of risk factors per patient and risk scores for the 93 patients are listed in tables 2 and 3. Conclusions. Validation of this VTE RAM will identify medical patients at risk of VTE that do not readily fit into group-specific VTE risk categories. Additionally, validation will identify subsets of patients at especially high risk of VTE and focus future randomized controlled trials. Other VTE risk factors may be identified with the study. Review of the 120 VTE cohort patients needs to be completed as well as review of a comparator control cohort. Approximately 80% of the current VTE cohort appears to have a score of 2 or above and be at moderate to high risk of VTE. Final results of approximately 150 VTE patients will be presented along with the control cohort as well as if the model is valid. Disclosures: Turpie: Astellas Pharma Europe: Consultancy; Bayer HealthCare AG: Consultancy; Portola Pharma: Consultancy; sanofi-aventis: Consultancy.

Risk factors for symptomatic venous thromboembolism in Thai hospitalised medical patients

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (12) ◽  
pp. 1103-1108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noppacharn Uaprasert ◽  
Laddawan Vajragupta ◽  
Numphung Numkarunarunrote ◽  
Nathaporn Tanpowpong ◽  
Pranee Sutcharitchan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Autoimmune Disease ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Solid Tumours ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Risk Patients

SummaryThromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) failed to reduce overall mortality in hospitalised medical patients. As a VTE prediction model for Asians is still lacking, this study aimed to identify very high risk patients who would be the main target for prevention. In 2009, medical patients admitted to King Chulalongkorn Memorial hospital, a tertiary care centre, were prospectively evaluated for risk factors. The high-risk cohort was monitored for symptomatic VTE until six weeks after discharge. No heparin prophylaxis was given. Of 1,290 high-risk patients, 27 (2.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3–2.9) developed proven VTE, 25.9% of which were diagnosed after discharge. Cases with VTE stayed longer in the hospital (median 18 vs. 11 days, p < 0.001). The significant risk factors in a multivariate analysis were autoimmune disease, solid tumours, family history of VTE, varicose vein and oestrogen with the relative risks of 11.8, 4.7, 120.3, 40.1 and 17.1 (p < 0.001, 0.001, 0.001, 0.002 and 0.038), respectively. Either autoimmune disease or solid tumours were found in 63% of VTE with the relative risk of 4.5 (95% CI 2.1–9.7, p < 0.001). In contrast, previously reported VTE scores in western patients could not stratify the VTE risks, but all the scores predicted higher mortality. In conclusion, VTE is common in Asian hospitalised medical patients. Patients with autoimmune disease and those with solid tumours are highly susceptible to VTE. A prophylactic strategy in these groups is required.

Comparison of venous thromboembolism risk stratification models in a high risk otolaryngology patient cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 129-134
Author(s):  
Tristan Tham ◽  
Peter Costantino
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Scoring Systems ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Assessment Tools ◽  
University Of Michigan ◽  
Data Collection Process ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The University

Our objective was to compare the venous thromboembolism outcomes in two of the most commonly utilised venous thromboembolism assessment tools, the Caprini system and the University of Michigan system, in a high risk head and neck surgery population. Currently, there is a lack of data reporting the validation of well known scoring systems in this patient population. Established risk factors for venous thromboembolism were included in the data collection process. We retrospectively evaluated all patients with the Caprini Risk Assessment and the University of Michigan Health System (UMHS) Scores. Out of all the risk factors, only length of surgery was found to be associated with venous thromboembolism. The mean Caprini scores in those with and without venous thromboembolism were 8.00 ± 3.00 and 6.86 ± 1.45, respectively. The mean UMHS scores in those with and without venous thromboembolism were 6.85 ± 1.28 and 6.54 ± 1.20, respectively. Both scoring systems were not found to be associated with venous thromboembolism.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document