Validation of the Use of Apixaban As an Alternate Anticoagulant for the Management of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia.

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 2265-2265
Author(s):  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
Margaret Prechel ◽  
Debra Hoppensteadt ◽  
Vicki Escalante ◽  
Talhah Chaudhry ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 2265 Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune mediated disorder due to antibodies generated against platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexed with heparin, is associated with a pronounced hypercoagulable state, thrombin generation, endothelial cell damage, and upregulation of an inflammatory state. Alternative anticoagulants that do not interact with HIT antibodies are needed for the anticoagulant management of these heparin compromised patients. Intravenous use direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) such as argatroban and lepirudin became the first effective non-heparin anticoagulant drug treatments for patients with HIT. Although DTIs are effective, their use is associated with a bleeding risk and drug-specific limitations. For the long-term anticoagulation, patients are switched from the intravenous DTI to oral warfarin. Aside from the unpredictable pharmacokinetics and need for routine monitoring, the slow onset of action and potential to precipitate venous limb gangrene/skin necrosis due to inhibition of protein C are concerning aspects of warfarin treatment of patients with HIT. Apixaban is a new small molecule, direct acting oral FXa inhibitor that may be considered for the anticoagulant management of patients with HIT. Methods: In order to determine if there is a lack of functional platelet activation and platelet aggregation for apixaban in the presence of HIT antibodies, the two traditional and widely used clinical laboratory tests for the diagnosis of HIT were utilized: the gold standard 14C-Serotonin Release Assay (14C-SRA; using washed platelets) and the heparin-induced platelet aggregation assay (PA-HIT; using platelet rich plasma). Based on different methodologies, these assays have different specificities and sensitivities to HIT antibodies and provide different yet complimentary information. This study employed HIT antibodies from multiple patients and platelets from different donors to assure the robustness of the data outcome. The response to apixaban concentrations covering the clinical dose range (0.05 to 50 mg/mL) was compared to the response obtained with clinically relevant concentrations of unfractionated heparin (UFH; 0.1 and 100 U/mL). Results: In the 14C-SRA (n=35) and in the PA-HIT (n=37), only baseline negative platelet activation and aggregation responses with all of the HIT specimens were observed at all apixaban concentrations (average across all concentrations: 11 ± 4 % serotonin release and 8 ± 3 % aggregation, respectively; mean ± SEM; positive responses are >20%). In comparison, UFH gave strong positive responses to each of the same HIT antibody specimen/platelet donor combinations (82 ± 3 % release and 78 ± 6 % aggregation at 0.1 U/mL; p<0.01 vs apixaban). Comparative studies demonstrated strong responses for enoxaparin (n=10; 73 ± 5 % release and 62 ± 7 % aggregation at 10 mg/mL) equal to UFH and no positive response for fondaparinux (n=20) in both test systems. Conclusions: This study confirms a consistent absence of platelet activation and platelet aggregation with apixaban in the presence of HIT antibodies across a wide range of concentrations. Based on the inert response of apixaban in these in vitro studies and because it is structurally unrelated to heparin, apixaban is not expected to contribute to the propagation of the HIT syndrome and could potentially be used for the anticoagulant management of patients with HIT. Since apixaban is a potent inhibitor of thrombin generation it is expected to have an additional benefit in blunting the hypercoagulable state which is observed in the HIT syndrome. Apixaban may provide an option for oral anticoagulation in patients with HIT both for in-hospital and out-patient settings, for the extended management of heparin compromised patients, and for the prevention of HIT. Clinical trials to determine dosing regimens that provide safe and effective anticoagulation during the various clinical phases of HIT are warranted. Disclosures: Walenga: Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Prechel:Bristol-Myer Suibb: Research Funding. Hoppensteadt:Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Escalante:Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Chaudhry:Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Jeske:Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding. Bakhos:Bristol-Myer Squibb: Research Funding.

2000 ◽  
Vol 124 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fabrizio Fabris ◽  
Sarfraz Ahmad ◽  
Giuseppe Cella ◽  
Walter P. Jeske ◽  
Jeanine M. Walenga ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective.—This review of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), the most frequent and dangerous side effect of heparin exposure, covers the epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of this disease syndrome. Data Sources and Study Selection.—Current consensus of opinion is given based on literature reports, as well as new information where available. A comprehensive analysis of the reasons for discrepancies in incidence numbers is given. The currently known mechanism is that HIT is mediated by an antibody to the complex of heparin–platelet factor 4, which binds to the Fc receptor on platelets. New evidence suggests a functional heterogeneity in the anti-heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies generated to heparin, and a “superactive” heparin-platelet factor 4 antibody that does not require the presence of heparin to promote platelet activation or aggregation has been identified. Up-regulation of cell adhesion molecules and inflammatory markers, as well as preactivation of platelets/endothelial cells/leukocytes, are also considered to be related to the pathophysiology of HIT. Issues related to the specificity of currently available and new laboratory assays that support a clinical diagnosis are addressed in relation to the serotonin-release assay. Past experience with various anticoagulant treatments is reviewed with a focus on the recent successes of thrombin inhibitors and platelet GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors to combat the platelet activation and severe thrombotic episodes associated with HIT. Conclusions.—The pathophysiology of HIT is multifactorial. However, the primary factor in the mediation of the cellular activation is due to the generation of an antibody to the heparin-platelet factor 4 complex. This review is written as a reference for HIT research.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3742-3742
Author(s):  
Eve-Anne Guéry ◽  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Cloé Derray ◽  
Joévin Besombes ◽  
Wayne Corentin Lambert ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) is today considered as the "gold standard" to detect pathogenic Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia (HIT) antibodies. However, this method is time-consuming, expensive and necessitates the use of 14C-radio-labelled serotonin, this implicating a specific agreement and secured premises, with a non-negligible environmental impact. These limitations explain that the use of SRA is restricted to a few laboratories worldwide. Finding a more accessible method with similar performances is therefore a challenge, and other different functional assays, such as Heparin-Induced Multiple Electrode Aggregometry (HIMEA), Light Transmission Aggregometry (LTA) using platelet rich plasma (PRP) or washed platelet (WP), ATP release, and Flow Cytometry (FC), are available. However, the sensitivity of these assays has never been comparatively evaluated with a standardized reagent. Objectives: The objective of our study was therefore to evaluate the sensitivity of these 5 functional methods for the detection of HIT antibodies in comparison with SRA, using 5B9, a monoclonal chimeric anti-PF4/H IgG recently developed in our laboratory, which fully mimics the effects of human HIT antibodies (Kizlik-Masson et al, J Thromb Haemost, 2017). Material and Methods: Platelet activation induced by 5B9 with heparin was assessed by the 6 following methods with blood samples from 10 consecutive unselected healthy donors:HIMEA performed with whole blood (Multiplate Analyzer® Roche),LTA performed with PRP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),FC based on the assessment of P-selectin expression and performed with PRP (HIT Confirm®, Emosis on AccuriC6 plus®, Becton Dickinson),ATP release performed with WP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),LTA performed with WP (Chronolog®, Chrono-Log corporation),SRA performed with WP (LSC scintillation counter, Perkin Elmer). For each method, different concentrations of 5B9 (10-20-50 µg/mL) were tested without heparin, and with "therapeutic" or high concentrations of unfractionated heparin (ranging from 0.1 to 1 and from 10 to 200 IU/mL respectively, according to the functional assay performed). The 3 concentrations of 5B9 were previously defined as "low" (10 µg/mL inducing in most cases a serotonin release <50% and no platelet aggregation in PRP), "high" (50 µg/mL always inducing a serotonin release >50% and platelet aggregation in PRP) or "intermediate" (20 µg/mL yielding variable results). Results: With the highest concentration of 5B9 (50 µg/mL), a strong platelet activation was detected with all methods and donors tested. HIMEA exhibited similar sensitivity (Ss 100%) than SRA to detect the activation induced by 20 μg/mL 5B9. FC was also able to detect the effect induced by 20 μg/mL 5B9 with 9/10 donors tested (90%). Alternatively, the measurement of ATP release, and LTA performed with WP or PRP failed to detect the effect of 20 μg/mL 5B9 in 30, 30 and 40 % of donors tested, respectively. SRA was the only method able to detect platelet activation induced by 10 μg/mL 5B9 with all donors tested, and the other methods were less sensitive (table). LTA performed with PRP was always negative (Ss= 0%). Platelet washings increased LTA sensitivity for detecting 10 or 20 μg/mL 5B9 (40% and 70% with WP vs. 0 and 60% with PRP, respectively), and the measurement of ATP release exhibited similar sensitivity. When platelet activation was evaluated in whole blood by HIMEA or in PRP using FC, the sensitivity to detect HIT antibodies was also improved (60% and 50%, respectively). Conclusion: These results confirm that SRA is likely the more sensitive functional assay to detect low concentrations of HIT antibodies. Indeed, apart from SRA, none of the other methods was able to detect the lowest concentration of 5B9 with 100% of donors. Interestingly, FC or HIMEA, which are rapid assays, also exhibit a high sensitivity, close to 100%, for detecting "intermediate" concentrations of HIT antibodies (i.e. corresponding to 20 μg/mL 5B9). We will further study the performances of these functional tests, including their specificity, by assessing patient's samples with confirmed HIT or having developed non-pathogenic antibodies (study in progress). Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1141-1141
Author(s):  
Elena Monzón Manzano ◽  
Ihosvany Fernandez-Bello ◽  
Raul Justo Sanz ◽  
Larissa Valor ◽  
Francisco Javier López-Longo ◽  
...  

Introduction: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease of unknown origin characterized by a hypercoagulable state and a high mortality rate. Mechanisms that cause the accelerated deterioration of cardiovascular health in SLE are unknown. Objectives: to characterize the prothrombotic state in SLE patients by global coagulation assays and the contribution of platelets, endothelial damage, microparticles and neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in their prothombotic profile. Material and methods: 72 patients and 90 healthy controls were recruited. Patients were classified according to clinical characteristics in: 32 with lupus (SLE group), 29 with SLE and antiphospholipid antibodies (aFL, SLE+aFL group) and 12 who met the criteria for SLE and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS, SLE+APS group). Experimental protocol was approved by La Paz University Hospital Ethics Committee. Venous blood collected in BD sodium citrate tubes (3.2%) was centrifuged at 150 g for 20 min at 23ºC to obtain platelet-rich plasma (PRP). PPP was obtained by centrifugation at 1500 g for 15 min at 23ºC. To obtain neutrophils, whole blood was centrifuged to 1600 rpm 25 min using a Ficoll gradient and red cells were lysed. Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) was performed in naTEM condition. Clotting time (CT, time from start of measurement until initiation of clotting [in seconds]); alpha angle (tangent to the curve at 2-mm amplitude [in degrees]), Ax (clot firmness at time x, [in mm]) and maximum clot firmness (MCF, [in mm]) were recorded. Procoagulant activity associated to microparticle's content of tissue factor was determined in PPP by Calibrated Automated Thrombogram (CAT) using MP-reagent (4 mM phospholipids, Diagnostica Stago, Spain). We evaluated the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP, the total amount of thrombin generated over time); the lag time (the time to the beginning of the explosive burst of thrombin generation); the peak height of the curve (the maximum thrombin concentration produced) and the time to the peak. Thrombin generation associated to NETs was also measured by CAT. Neutrophils from healthy controls or from LES patients were stimulated with 100 nM PMA in RPMI medium during 45 min at 37º and then cocultivated with PRP adjusted to 105 platelets/µL. NETs formation was verified by fluorescent microscopy performed with DAPI and an anti-myeloperoxidase antibody. Plasma levels of LDL-ox, E-Selectin and PAI-1 were determined by Elisa (R&D Systems, MN, USA and Affymetrix eBioscience, Vienna, Austria, respectively). Platelet activation was analysed by flow cytometry (FCM, FACScan, BD Biosciences). Fibrinogen receptor activation was evaluated through PAC1-FITC binding and release of granule's content was assessed with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) anti-CD63 and anti P-selectin in quiescent and 100 µM TRAP and 10 µM ADP stimulated platelets. Data were analysed with Graphpad prism and p ≤0.05 was stablished as statistical significance. Results: PAI-1 plasma level was increased in all patient's groups, whereas LDL-ox and E-selectin showed no differences with control cohort (Fig.1). ROTEM demonstrated a procoagulant profile in SLE and SLE+aPL but not in SLE+APS group (Fig. 2). PAI-1 levels correlated with several ROTEM parameters (Table 1). SLE patients and SLE+aFL showed a basal platelet activation. Moreover, SLE group exposed more P-selectin and CD63 than controls (Fig.3). Regarding thrombin generation associated to tissue-factor content of microparticles, no differences were observed between SLE patients and healthy controls. On the other hand, SLE patients had an increased peak of thrombin generation related to NETs formation (control group: 170.3± 58.0, SLE patients: 230.6±39.3, p=0.019). Conclusions: ROTEM® detected a hypercoagulable state in SLE and SLE+aPL patients. The hypercoagulable state might be linked to increased PAI-1 plasma levels and basal platelet activation in SLE and SLE+aPL groups. Moreover, neutrophils from SLE patients seemed to present a basal activation that induced a NETs-related procoagulant state in these patients. SLE+APS patients did not show a hypercoagulable state perhaps because of the presence of lupus anticoagulant and/or to therapeutic treatment of these patients. This work was supported by grants from the FIS-FONDOS FEDER (PI15/01457, NB). NVB holds a Miguel Servet tenure track grant from FIS-FONDOS FEDER (CP14/00024). Disclosures Fernandez-Bello: Novartis, Pfizer, ROCHE, Stago: Speakers Bureau. Robles:ABBVIE, SANDOZ FARMACEUTICA: Speakers Bureau. Álvarez Roman:Sobi: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; CSL Behring: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Roche: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Bayer: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Research Funding; NovoNordisk: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Canales:Celgene: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Sandoz: Honoraria; iQone: Honoraria; Takeda: Speakers Bureau; SOBI: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Honoraria; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau. Jimenez-Yuste:Bayer, CSL Behring, Grifols, Novo Nordisk, Octapharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sobi, Shire: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: reimbursement for attending symposia/congresses , Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. Butta:Novartis: Consultancy; Roche, Pfizer: Speakers Bureau.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2757-2757
Author(s):  
Ishac Nazi ◽  
Donald M Arnold ◽  
James W Smith ◽  
Theodore E. Warkentin ◽  
Jane C Moore ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common drug reaction that causes arterial or venous thrombosis as a result of heparin therapy. Platelet-activating antibodies, against complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin, cause intense platelet activation, ultimately leading to an increased risk of thrombosis, limb-loss and even death. Most patients exposed to heparin will produce non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies while only a small number will produce platelet-activating and HIT-causing antibodies (pathogenic HIT antibodies). Among HIT tests, the functional assays, such as the serotonin release assay (SRA), correlate best with the disease because they can specifically identify the pathogenic HIT antibodies whereas the enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) cannot. We have previously shown that anti-PF4/heparin antibody production precedes thrombocytopenia in HIT patients (Warkentin et al., Blood 2009 113: 4963-4969) possibly indicating the need for a threshold plasma level of pathogenic HIT antibody, among other factors, to cause the disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the presence of low levels of pathogenic HIT antibodies in samples from patients suspected of HIT who had detectable anti-PF4/heparin antibodies in the EIA (EIA-positive), but who did not have platelet-activating antibodies in the standard SRA (SRA-negative). Methods: We used an in-house IgG-specific EIA to detect the presence of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies (EIA-positive: OD405nm> 0.45) and the standard SRA to detect the presence of heparin-dependent platelet-activating antibodies (SRA-positive: release >20% with 0.1-0.3 IU/mL of unfractionated heparin). We developed an enhanced SRA (eSRA) by adding increasing concentrations of exogenous PF4 (0-100 μg/mL) to detect sub-threshold levels of platelet activating antibodies undetectable in the standard SRA (eSRA-positive: release >20%). Samples tested were referred for HIT testing by the McMaster Platelet Immunology Laboratory (Hamilton, Canada). Results: Sera from healthy individuals (n=10) and from suspected HIT patients with a negative anti-PF4/heparin EIA (n=15) did not demonstrate platelet activation in the eSRA at any dose of exogenous PF4 added. SRA-positive sera (n = 7), diluted sufficiently that they were non-reactive in the standard SRA, demonstrated PF4 dose-dependent platelet activation in the eSRA. This confirmed the increased sensitivity of the eSRA in detecting low-titre platelet-activating antibodies. Reactivity in the eSRA was inhibited by high heparin (100 U/mL) and by blocking the platelet FcgRIIa receptor with the monoclonal antibody IV.3. We then tested samples (n=24) referred for HIT testing that were positive in the anti-PF4/heparin EIA (optical densities OD405nm 0.7 to 2.4) but negative in the standard SRA. Heparin-dependent platelet activation (20-99% release) was demonstrated in 11 of 24 (46%) in the eSRA. This reactivity directly correlated with the amount of PF4 added to the platelets (optimal concentration of PF4 12.5 - 100 μg/mL) but not with the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. In further investigations, we concentrated (4-fold) 7 of the 11 eSRA-positive samples in an attempt to increase the concentration of the antibodies. Of those 7 samples, 5 (71%) became positive in the standard SRA upon testing of the concentrated sample. Conclusions: These data indicate that low-titre platelet-activating antibodies may be found in some patients suspected of having HIT that test negative in the standard SRA irrespective of the strength (OD405nm) of the anti-PF4/heparin EIA. The immune response during heparin therapy can produce both families of pathogenic and non-pathogenic anti-PF4/heparin antibodies but it is the titre of the pathogenic antibody that may be necessary for platelet activation. Perhaps under permissive clinical conditions and with patient-specific factors, the titre of the pathogenic HIT antibodies may increase and lead to HIT. Disclosures Warkentin: Pfizer Canada: Honoraria; Instrumentation Laboratory: Honoraria; GlaxoSmithKline: Consultancy, Research Funding; W.L. Gore: Consultancy, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3746-3746
Author(s):  
Angela Huynh ◽  
Donald M. Arnold ◽  
James W. Smith ◽  
Taylor D. Elliott ◽  
Hina Bhakta ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a complication of heparin therapy that is caused by antibodies to complexes of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. Several studies have reported that in order for these immune complexes to be pathogenic, they must assemble on the platelet surface. When bound to the platelet surface, the conformation of PF4 allows for optimal presentation of the epitope for antibody binding and subsequent activation of Fc-receptors on platelets and monocytes. To what degree pathogenic HIT immune complexes can form and activate platelets in fluid-phase as with other immune complex diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, glomerulonephritis, and rheumatoid arthritis) is not known. We used mutated PF4 proteins that can no longer bind the platelet surface to evaluate anti-PF4/heparin antibody induced platelet activation. We hypothesized that the epitopes required for PF4 binding of HIT antibodies and subsequent platelet activation can be formed in fluid-phase. Methods: Each of the 70 amino acids of PF4 were mutated previously by alanine scanning mutagenesis where non-alanine residues were mutated to alanine or alanine residues to valine. We selected 14 PF4 mutants that affected KKO (a platelet-activating murine monoclonal HIT-like antibody) binding in a heparin-capture assay for this study. Mutant and wild-type PF4 were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and affinity purified. To confirm binding to platelets, biotin-conjugated PF4 mutants were incubated with donor platelets and PF4 platelet binding was measured using streptavidin-FITC by flow cytometry. Platelet activation was measured using a modified 14C-serotonin-release assay, where excess wild-type or mutant PF4 (0, 50 and 100 μg/mL) was added to 14C-serotonin-labelled donor platelets and activation was measured after incubation with KKO. ≥20% 14C-serotonin release was considered positive for platelet activation. Platelet activation was correlated with platelet surface binding to identify mutants that could form surface-bound or fluid-phase antigenic complexes. Results: Of the 14 PF4 mutants tested, 7 bound to platelet surfaces and 11 supported platelet activation by KKO. These PF4 mutants were further characterized into 3 categories: PF4 mutants that bound to the platelet surface and induced platelet activation (n=6); PF4 mutants that did not bind to the platelet surface but induced platelet activation (n=5); and PF4 mutants that bound to the platelet surface but did not induce platelet activation (n=1). These results indicate that certain PF4 mutants were able to bind KKO and induce platelet activation in fluid-phase. These data suggest that specific epitopes in fluid-phase PF4/heparin immune complexes can mediate platelet activation in HIT, without the need for surface assembly on the platelet. Conclusions: Using point mutations of PF4, we have identified that the HIT antigenic complexes can be formed in fluid-phase and induce platelet activation. Further studies are required to investigate the role of a fluid-phase HIT antigen complex in the development of thrombocytopenia, inflammation and thrombosis of HIT. This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Disclosures Arnold: Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; UCB: Consultancy; UCB: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding.


1993 ◽  
Vol 69 (04) ◽  
pp. 344-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
B H Chong ◽  
J Burgess ◽  
F Ismail

SummaryThe platelet aggregation test is widely used for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), a potentially serious complication of heparin therapy. We have evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in comparison with those of the 14C-serotonin release test. The sensitivity of the platelet aggregation test was found to vary with the heparin concentration and the donor of the platelets used in the test. The optimal heparin concentrations were between 0.1 and 1.0 U/ml. Using these heparin concentrations, the mean sensitivity varied from 39% (with the least reactive platelets) to 81% (with the most reactive platelets). In comparison, the sensitivity of the release test ranged from 65% to 94%. The specificities of the platelet aggregation test were 82%, 90% and 100% for the following control groups: (1) non-thrombocytopenic patients given heparin, (2) patients with thrombocytopenia due to other causes, and (3) normal controls not given heparin, respectively. The corresponding specificities for the release test was 94%, 90% and 100%. The specificities can be further increased to 100% for all controls with the adoption of a two-point system which defines a positive result as one in which platelet aggregation occurs with a low heparin concentration (0.5 U/ml) but not with 100 U heparin/ml. For optimal results, a two-point platelet aggregation test should be performed with heparin concentrations of 0.5 and 100 U/ml and using platelets of more reactive donors.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3207-3207
Author(s):  
Patrick Van Dreden ◽  
Joseph Gligorov ◽  
Evangelos Terpos ◽  
Mathieu Jamelot ◽  
Michele Sabbah ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: COVID-19 has been associated with hypercoagulability, endothelial cell injury and frequent thrombotic complications resulting both from direct effects of the virus on the endothelium and from the 'cytokine storm' resulting from the host's immune response. Since the COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to effectively prevent symptomatic infection including hospital admissions and severe disease, the risk of COVID-19-related thrombosis should be expected to (almost) disappear in vaccinated individuals. However, some rare cases of venous thrombosis have been reported in individuals vaccinated with mRNA vaccines. Thus, there is a sharp contrast between the clinical or experimental data reported in the literature on COVID-19 and on the rare thrombotic events observed after the vaccination with these vaccines. This phenomenon raised some scepticism of even some fear about the safety of these vaccines which could compromise the adhesion of the citizens in the vaccination program. Aims: We conducted a prospective observational study, to explore the impact of vaccination with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer/BioNTech) on blood hypercoagulability and endothelial cell activation and to investigate if this is modified by the presence of active cancer. Methods: In total 229 subjects were prospectively included in the study from April to June 2021. Subjects were stratified in three predefined groups: 127 vaccinated patients with active cancer (VOnco group), 72 vaccinated health care workers (VHcw group) and 30 non vaccinated health individuals (Control group). Blood samples were obtained 2 days after the administration of the first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine and collected in Vacutainer® tubes (0.109 mol/L trisodium citrate). Platelet poor plasma (PPP) was prepared by double centrifugation at 2000 g for 20 minutes at room temperature and plasma aliquots were stored at -80°C until assayed. Samples of PPP were assessed for thrombin generation (TG) with PPP-Reagent® (Thrombogram-Thrombinoscope assay with PPP-Reagent®TF 5pM), E-selectin, D-dimers, (D-Di), Tissue Factor (TFa), procoagulant phospholipid-dependent clotting time (Procag-PPL) and von Willebrand factor (vWF), thrombomodulin (TM), tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI), and platelet factor 4 (PF4). All assays were from Diagnostica Stago (France). The upper and lower normal limits (UNL and LNL) for each biomarker were calculated by the mean±2SD for the control group. Results: All vaccinated subjects showed significantly increased levels of PF4 (71% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.001), D-Dimers (74% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01), vWF (60% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01), FVIII (62% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01) and shorter Procoag-PPL clotting time (96% &lt;LNL, p&lt;0.001), as compared to controls. Thrombin generation showed significantly higher Peak (60% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01), ETP (38% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01) and MRI (66% &gt;UNL, p&lt;0.01) but no differences in lag-time in vaccinated subjects as compared to the control group. Vaccinated subjects did not show any increase at the levels of TFa, TFPI, TM and E-selectin in comparison with the control group. The studied biomarkers were not significantly different between the VOnco and VHcw groups. Conclusion: The ROADMAP-COVID-19-Vaccine study shows that administration of the first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine induced significant platelet activation documented by shorter Procoag-PPL associated with increased levels of PF4. Plasma hypercoagulability was less frequent in vaccinated individuals whereas there was no evidence of significant endothelial cells activation after vaccination. Interestingly, the presence of active cancer was not associated with an enhancement of platelet activation, hypercoagulability, or endothelial cell activation after the vaccination. Probably, the generated antibodies against the spike protein or lead to platelet activation in a FcyRIIa dependent manner that results in PF4 release. The implication of the mild inflammatory reaction triggered by the vaccination could be another possible pathway leading to platelet activation. Nevertheless, vaccination does not provoke endothelial activation even in patients with cancer. The findings of the ROADMAP-COVID-19-Vaccine study support the concept administration of mRNA based vaccines does not directly cause a systematic hypercoagulability. Disclosures Gligorov: Roche-Genentech: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Onxeo: Research Funding; Daichi: Research Funding; MSD: Research Funding; Eisai: Research Funding; Genomic Heatlh: Research Funding; Ipsen: Research Funding; Macrogenics: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding. Terpos: Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Genesis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; GSK: Honoraria, Research Funding. Dimopoulos: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Beigene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 582-582
Author(s):  
Caroline Vayne ◽  
Raghavendra Palankar ◽  
Sandra Billy ◽  
Stefan Handtke ◽  
Thomas Thiele ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a severe complication of recombinant adenoviral vector vaccines used to prevent COVID-19, likely due to anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG antibodies. The specificity and platelet-activating activity of VITT antibodies strikingly resemble that of antibodies detected in "autoimmune" heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), but their features remain poorly characterized. In particular, a better knowledge of these antibodies should help to understand the mechanisms leading to hypercoagulability and the particular thrombotic events observed in VITT, but rarely in typical HIT. We have recently developed a chimeric IgG1 anti-PF4 antibody, 1E12, which strongly mimics "autoimmune" HIT antibodies in terms of specificity and cellular effects. Therefore, we assessed whether 1E12 could mimic VITT antibodies. We then evaluated the capability of DG-1E12, a deglycosylated form of 1E12 unable to bind FcγR, to inhibit cellular activation induced by VITT antibodies. Methods and Results Using a PF4-sensitized serotonin release assay (PF4-SRA) (Vayne C, New Engl J Med, 2021), we demonstrated that 1E12 (5 and 10 μg/mL) strongly activated platelets, with a pattern similar to that obtained with human VITT samples (n=7), i.e. in a PF4-dependent manner and without heparin. This platelet activation was inhibited by low heparin concentration (0.5 IU/mL), an effect also observed with VITT samples. Serotonin release induced by 1E12 was also fully inhibited by IV-3, a monoclonal antibody blocking FcγRIIa, or by IdeS, a bacterial protease that cleaves IgG and strongly inhibits the binding of IgG antibodies to FcγRIIa. This inhibitory effect of IV-3 and IdeS strongly supports that interactions between pathogenic anti-PF4 IgG and FcγRIIa play a central role in VITT. Incubation of 1E12 or VITT samples with isolated neutrophils (PMN) and platelets with PF4 (10 µg/mL) strongly induced DNA release and NETosis, supporting that PMN are involved in the processes leading to thrombosis in VITT. Furthermore, when whole blood from healthy donors incubated with 1E12 or VITT plasma was perfused in capillaries coated with von Willebrand Factor, numerous large platelet/leukocyte aggregates containing fibrin(ogen) were formed. To investigate whether 1E12 and VITT antibodies recognize overlapping epitopes on PF4, we then performed competitive assays with a deglycosylated form of 1E12 (DG-1E12), still able to bind PF4 but not to interact with Fcγ receptors. In PF4-SRA, pre-incubation of DG-1E12 (50 µg/mL) dramatically reduced platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies, which was fully abrogated for 9 of the 14 VITT samples tested. Additional experiments using a whole blood PF4-enhanced flow cytometry assay recently designed for VITT diagnosis (Handtke et al, Blood 2021), confirmed that DG-1E12 fully prevented platelet activation induced by VITT antibodies. Moreover, when platelets and neutrophils were pre-incubated with DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL), NETosis and thus DNA release, nuclear rounding, and DNA decondensation induced by VITT antibodies were completely inhibited. Finally, DG-1E12 (100 µg/mL) also fully abolished VITT antibody-mediated thrombus formation in whole blood in vitro under vein flow conditions. Comparatively, DG-1E12 did not inhibit ALB6, a murine monoclonal anti-CD9 antibody, which also strongly activates platelets in a FcγRIIa-dependent manner. Conclusions Our results show that 1E12 exhibits features similar to those of human VITT antibodies in terms of specificity, affinity and cellular effects, and could therefore be used as a model antibody to study the pathophysiology of VITT. Our data also demonstrate that DG-1E12 prevents blood cell activation and thrombus formation induced by VITT antibodies, likely due to the competitive effect of its Fab fragment on antibody binding to PF4. DG-1E12 may allow the development of a new drug neutralizing the pathogenic effect of autoimmune anti-PF4 antibodies, such as those associated with VITT. Disclosures Thiele: Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Other; Pfizer: Honoraria, Other; Bayer: Honoraria; Chugai Pharma: Honoraria, Other; Novo Nordisk: Other; Novartis: Honoraria; Daichii Sankyo: Other. Pouplard: Stago: Research Funding. Greinacher: Macopharma: Honoraria; Biomarin/Prosensa: Other, Research Funding; Sagent: Other, Research Funding; Rovi: Other, Research Funding; Gore inc.: Other, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Other, Research Funding; Paringenix: Other, Research Funding; BMS: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; MSD: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Aspen: Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Portola: Other; Ergomed: Other; Instrument Laboratory: Honoraria; Chromatec: Honoraria. Gruel: Stago: Other: symposium fees, Research Funding. Rollin: Stago: Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 3564-3564
Author(s):  
Michael Dockal ◽  
Rudolf Hartmann ◽  
Thomas Polakowski ◽  
Johannes Brandstetter ◽  
Willibald Kammlander ◽  
...  

Abstract TFPI is an important inhibitor of the extrinsic coagulation pathway. It efficiently inhibits TF-FVIIa and FXa by quaternary complex formation. Plasma contains various truncated forms of TFPI which are poor inhibitors, and full length (fl)TFPI (0.3 – 0.5 nM) which is the most active TFPI in plasma. flTFPI is released from platelets upon activation, and increases flTFPI concentrations locally up to 30-fold. Most intravascular TFPI (∼80%) is associated with endothelial cells. Both endothelial forms, TFPIa and TFPIb, are similarily effective inhibitors of FX activation on the endothelial cell surface. Inhibition of TFPI in hemophilia models with blocking antibodies, aptamers or peptide inhibitors improves hemostasis and may become an option to treat hemophilia. Recently, we presented peptide inhibitors of TFPI that enhance coagulation in hemophilia models. Two optimized peptides, JBT-A7 and JBT-B5, efficiently blocked inhibitory activity of TFPI and bound to distinct binding sites. We demonstrated the crystal structure of JBT-A7, a linear TFPI inhibitory peptide composed of 20 amino acids, bound to NtermK1 (TFPI 1-83). JBT-B5, a cyclic TFPI inhibitory peptide of 23 amino acids, co-crystallized with TFPI KD1-KD2 (TFPI 22-150). Overlaying the KD1 structure in the KD1-KD2/JBT-B5 and the NTermK1/JBT-A7 complex provided atomic details for linking the two peptide entities. Binding of peptides to TFPI and TFPI fragments was studied by BioCore. The TFPI inhibitory potential of the resulting fusion peptide was tested in model systems (FXa inhibition and TF-FVIIa catalyzed FX activation) and global hemostatic assays (TF-triggered thrombin generation) using hemophilia plasma. To model situations of increased TFPI concentration, both model and plasma assays were carried out at TFPI concentrations up to 10 nM, which is 40-50-fold higher than the physiological flTFPI plasma concentration. To characterize the inhibition of platelet TFPI, we used platelets isolated from blood samples and platelet rich plasma from different donors. Binding of a biotinylated fusion peptide on living HUVE cells was assessed by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) and fluorescence microscopy. Inhibition of cell surface TFPI was analyzed on cultivated HUVECs stimulated with TNFa for TF expression. We monitored FXa generation by the TFPI-dependent cell surface FX activation complex by conversion of an FXa-specific fluorogenic substrate. The overlay of the crystal structures of KD1-KD2/JBT-B5 and the NTermKD1/JBT-A7 complexes revealed non-overlapping epitopes and close proximity of the termini of both peptides. The distance could be bridged by an approximately ten amino acid linker. A fusion peptide with a 10-serine-linker was synthesized and showed highly improved dissociation in Biacore experiments and most efficiently inhibited TFPI activity in the model assays. In contrast, single peptides only partially inhibit TFPI especially at high TFPI concentrations. In thrombin generation assays using hemophilia plasma, the fusion peptide showed a substantially higher ability than the single peptides to increase the thrombin peak even at elevated TFPI. The fusion peptide efficiently inhibited TFPI released from platelets and improved thrombin generation in TFPI deficient plasma reconstituted with platelets as the only source of TFPI released upon platelet activation. The fusion peptide was also shown to bind TFPI on the surface of living HUVECs. This is consistent with its binding epitopes on KD1 and KD2 which result in inhibition of cell surface TFPI in a cell based FX activation assay. Thus, we demonstrate that a molecular fusion peptide most efficiently inhibits all physiologic forms of TFPI. X-ray structures of binary and ternary peptide TFPI complexes provided atomic details for linking two single peptides to generate a fusion peptide that most efficiently blocks TFPI in plasma, released from platelets and associated with endothelial cells. It most efficiently neutralizes TFPI even at substantially elevated concentrations occurring at sites of platelet activation. Our observations support the notion that targeting TFPI with TFPI inhibitors is a promising novel strategy to mitigate the bleeding risk in hemophilia patients. Disclosures: Dockal: Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment. Hartmann:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment. Polakowski:3B Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany: Employment. Brandstetter:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Research Funding. Kammlander:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment. Panholzer:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment. Redl:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment. Osterkamp:3B Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany: Employment. Rosing:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Consultancy, Research Funding. Scheiflinger:Baxter Innovations GmbH, Vienna, Austria: Employment.


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter M. Newman ◽  
Beng H. Chong

Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is associated with antibodies directed against a complex of platelet factor 4 (PF4) and heparin. We were able to affinity purify anti-PF4–heparin IgG (HIT IgG) from the plasma of 2 patients with HIT. Under conditions that were more physiological and sensitive than those in previous studies, we observed that this HIT IgG caused platelet aggregation on the addition of heparin. Platelets activated with HIT IgG increased their release and surface expression of PF4. We quantitated, for the first time, the binding of affinity-purified HIT iodine 125–IgG to platelets as they activated in a plasma milieu. Binding of the HIT IgG was dependent on heparin and required some degree of platelet activation. Blocking the platelet FcγRII with the monoclonal antibody IV.3 did not prevent HIT IgG binding to activated platelets. We concluded that anti-PF4–heparin IgG is the component in these HIT plasmas that induces platelet aggregation. The Fab region of HIT IgG binds to PF4–heparin on the surface of activated platelets. We propose that only then does the Fc portion of the bound IgG further activate the same or adjacent platelets through the Fc receptor. Our data support a dynamic model of platelet activation in which released PF4 enhances further antibody binding and more release.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document