Elevated soluble MUC1 levels and decreased anti-MUC1 antibody levels in patients with multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 3147-3153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Treon ◽  
Peter Maimonis ◽  
Deborah Bua ◽  
Gloria Young ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Antibody Levels ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract Soluble MUC1 (sMUC1) levels are elevated in many MUC1+cancers. We and others have shown that MUC1 is expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) plasma cells and B cells. In this study, we measured sMUC1 levels in bone marrow (BM) plasma from 71 MM patients and 21 healthy donors (HDs), and in peripheral blood (PB) plasma from 42 MM patients and 13 HDs using an immunoassay that detects the CA27.29 epitope of MUC1. sMUC1 levels were found to be significantly greater (mean 31.76 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) in MM patient BM plasma versus HD BM plasma (mean 9.68 U/mL, range 0.65 to 39.83 U/mL) (P < .001). Importantly, BM plasma sMUC1 levels were related to tumor burden because sMUC1 levels were significantly higher for MM patients with active disease (34.62 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) versus MM patients with minimal residual disease (16.16 U/mL, range 5.7 to 56.68 U/mL) (P = .0026). sMUC1 levels were also elevated in the PB plasma of MM patients (32.79 U/mL, range 4.15 to 148.84 U/mL) versus HDs (18.47 U/mL, range 8.84 to 42.49) (P = .0052). Lastly, circulating immunglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to MUC1 were measured in 114 MM patients and 31 HDs, because natural antibodies to MUC1 have been detected in patients with other MUC1-bearing malignancies. These studies demonstrated lower levels of circulating IgM (P < .001) and IgG (P = .078) antibodies to MUC1 in MM patients compared with HDs. Our data therefore show that in MM patients, sMUC1 levels are elevated and correlate with disease burden, whereas anti-MUC1 antibody levels are decreased.

Elevated soluble MUC1 levels and decreased anti-MUC1 antibody levels in patients with multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (9) ◽  
pp. 3147-3153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven P. Treon ◽  
Peter Maimonis ◽  
Deborah Bua ◽  
Gloria Young ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Disease Burden ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Igg Antibodies ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Antibody Levels ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Active Disease

Soluble MUC1 (sMUC1) levels are elevated in many MUC1+cancers. We and others have shown that MUC1 is expressed on multiple myeloma (MM) plasma cells and B cells. In this study, we measured sMUC1 levels in bone marrow (BM) plasma from 71 MM patients and 21 healthy donors (HDs), and in peripheral blood (PB) plasma from 42 MM patients and 13 HDs using an immunoassay that detects the CA27.29 epitope of MUC1. sMUC1 levels were found to be significantly greater (mean 31.76 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) in MM patient BM plasma versus HD BM plasma (mean 9.68 U/mL, range 0.65 to 39.83 U/mL) (P < .001). Importantly, BM plasma sMUC1 levels were related to tumor burden because sMUC1 levels were significantly higher for MM patients with active disease (34.62 U/mL, range 5.69 to 142.48 U/mL) versus MM patients with minimal residual disease (16.16 U/mL, range 5.7 to 56.68 U/mL) (P = .0026). sMUC1 levels were also elevated in the PB plasma of MM patients (32.79 U/mL, range 4.15 to 148.84 U/mL) versus HDs (18.47 U/mL, range 8.84 to 42.49) (P = .0052). Lastly, circulating immunglobulin M (IgM) and IgG antibodies to MUC1 were measured in 114 MM patients and 31 HDs, because natural antibodies to MUC1 have been detected in patients with other MUC1-bearing malignancies. These studies demonstrated lower levels of circulating IgM (P < .001) and IgG (P = .078) antibodies to MUC1 in MM patients compared with HDs. Our data therefore show that in MM patients, sMUC1 levels are elevated and correlate with disease burden, whereas anti-MUC1 antibody levels are decreased.

scholarly journals Comparison of Minimal Residual Disease Detection between the Manual and Automated Gating Strategies of Euroflow Next-Generation Flow in Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3083-3083
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Takeshi Yamashita ◽  
Ryoichi Murata ◽  
Mikio Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Pharmaceutical Company ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Chugai Pharmaceutical ◽  
Company Limited ◽  
Minimal Residual

Background: The rate of complete response (CR) in multiple myeloma (MM) has dramatically increased because of the development of novel agents. In addition, the development of methods for measuring minimal residual disease (MRD), such as multiparameter flow cytometry and next-generation sequencing, has made it possible to stratify CR patients according to the MRD extent. EuroFlow next-generation flow (EuroFlow-NGF) is considered one of the gold standard methods for evaluating the negative status of MRD in MM. The automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF has been shown to detect MRD as accurately as the manual gating strategy by experts. Oberle et al. (Haematologica, 2017) have found that daratumumab persisted on the surface of myeloma cells treated with it and that the anti-CD38 multi-epitope antibody used in EuroFlow-NGF has partial cross-reactivity with daratumumab, leading to generally lower mean fluorescence intensities of CD38. Therefore, MRD levels may have been underestimated in patients who were treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) using the automated gating strategy, leading to inappropriate management of the patients. Because no studies have examined the correlation of MRD extent between the manual and automated gating strategies in patients with MM who have received anti-CD38 mAbs, we compared MRD detection between the two gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF in patients with MM. Methods: The study included bone marrow samples from 51 patients with MM (27 male and 24 female patients), including 13 patients treated with anti-CD38 mAb (12 treated with daratumumab and 1 treated with isatuximab). The median patient age was 70 years (range, 32-92 years) at MRD assessment. The disease statuses at MRD assessment were stringent CR in 26 patients (51%), CR in 7 (14%), very good partial response in 13 (26%), partial response in 1 (2%), and progressive disease in 4 (8%). The sample preparation protocol, Ab panel, and automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF have been reported previously (Flores-Montero et al. Leukemia 2017). Briefly, we performed the EuroFlow-NGF method, which involved ammonium chloride-based bulk lysis, followed by surface staining using antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 multiepitope (ME)-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, and CD81-APC C750 in tube 1 and surface/intracellular staining using antibodies against CD138-BV421, CD27-BV510, CD38 ME-FITC, CD56-PE, CD45-PerCP Cy5.5, CD19-PECy7, CD117-APC, CD81-APC C750, cytoplasmic (cy) Igκ-APC, and cyIgλ-APC C750 after permeabilization in tube 2. For data analysis, events from both eight-color tubes (tubes 1 and 2) were merged, and the values of all parameters per tube were mathematically calculated using the merge and calculation functions of Infinicyt software (Cytognos SL, Salamanca, Spain). Automatic identification and enumeration of total plasma cells (tPCs) and abnormal plasma cells (MRD) were performed using the automatic gating function of Infinicyt software as described previously (Flores-Montero et al. Leukemia 2017). We compared the total nucleated cell number, tPC ratio, and MRD ratio between the manual (by experts) and automated gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF. Results: In patients with MM who did not receive any anti-CD38 mAb therapy, we observed high correlations for both the tPC (r = 0.959, P < 0.0001) (Figure A) and MRD (r = 0.974, P < 0.0001) (Figure B) ratios between the manual and automated gating strategies of EuroFlow-NGF. On the other hand, in patients with MM who received anti-CD38 mAb therapy, we did not observe good correlations for both the tPC (r = 0.349, P = 0.2) (Figure A) and MRD (r = 0.292, P = 0.3) (Figure B) ratios between the two strategies owing to a lower fluorescence intensity of CD38 on PCs. In addition, when the MRD threshold was set to 10-5, the discordance of MRD positivity/negativity between the two strategies was significantly higher in patients who received anti-CD38 mAb therapy than in those who did not receive anti-CD38 mAb therapy [4/13 (31%) vs. 1/38 (3%), P = 0.012]. Conclusion: Although the automated gating strategy of EuroFlow-NGF could be a viable alternative to the manual strategy for the assessment of MRD in MM, we may have to utilize the manual strategy to obtain precise MRD results for patients with MM who received anti-CD38 mAbs. Figure Disclosures Takamatsu: Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; CSL Behring: Research Funding; SRL: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen Pharmaceutical: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Fujimoto Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Becton, Dickinson and Company: Honoraria; Abbvie: Consultancy; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria. Yoroidaka:Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Yamashita:Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; Daiichi-Sankyo Company: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; TEIJIN PHARMA LIMITED: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Murata:Celgene: Honoraria; Ono pharmaceutical: Honoraria. Nakao:Daiichi-Sankyo Company, Limited: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria; SynBio Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy; Ohtsuka Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Chugai Pharmaceutical Co.,Ltd: Honoraria; Kyowa Kirin: Honoraria; Alaxion Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria. Matsue:Novartis Pharma K.K: Honoraria; Ono Pharmaceutical: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K.: Honoraria.

scholarly journals The Prognostic Significance of Minimal Residual Disease Detection after Induction and ASCT to the Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4956-4956
Author(s):  
Weiqin Yao ◽  
Zhu Mingqing ◽  
Yao Feirong ◽  
Lingzhi Yan ◽  
Song Jin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Induction Therapy ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Depth Of Response ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Objective: In the last decade the outcome in multiple myeloma in CHINA has greatly improved due to the new, effective therapies including PIs and Imids. But responses to treatment and survival remains heterogeneous because of patient characteristic, disease biology and mechanisms of drug resistance. More and more studies have established the link between depth of response and improved PFS and OS. multiparameter-flow cytometry (MFC) is a main method to detect minimal residual disease(MRD) in myeloma. Sensitivity will be at least at 10-4 to 10-5 by 10-color MFC. Imaging techniques such as PET-CT are important for EMD and bone MRD detection. whole body DWI-MRI is a new imaging technique by mean of the apparent diffusion coefficient(ADC) which can qualify the depth of response to antineoplastic treatment. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic significance of MRD by 10-color MFC and imaging to the MM patients after induction.Methods: 102 patients with newly diagnosed MM were enrolled at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from July 2015 to July 2017. All patients were diagnosed and the response were assessed by IMWG criteria. The median of age was 58 (31-75).There were 46 patients with IgG type , 24 IgA , 14 light chain, 18 others. 34 Patients in ISS stageⅠ,34 in stage Ⅱ, 30 in stage Ⅲ. All patients received 4-6 cycles of triplet bortezomib based or lenalidomide based induction therapy. Transplantation available patients received APBSCT with BUCY condition followed by 4-6 cycles of bortezomib based or lenalidomide based consolidation which were given to transplantation unavailable patients too. Lenalidomide and thalidomide were used for over 2y of maintenance therapy. Bone marrow aspirates for MRD imaging MRD assessment were obtained at the end of induction and 1year after ASCT.The median of follow-up was 13 (2-29) months.Results: According to MRD by MFC and imaging after induction therapy and 1 year after ASCT, the patients were divided into different groups. MFC negativity was 33%(29/88) after induction therapy compared with 63%(32/51) after ASCT (X2=11.636,P=0.001). After induction therapy, the median PFS was 22 months for MRD positive group compared with not reached with MRD negative group by MFC (P=0.042) in patients with very good partial remission(VGPR) and above. The 2 years PFS was 100% for those with MRD negative compared with 60% for MRD positive by imaging. The 2 years PFS was 80% for those have multiclonal normal plasma cells compared with 52.6% for those without. The median PFS was not reached for MFC MRD negative patients 1 year after ASCT compared with 20 months for positive patients. (P=0.002). Multivariate analysis including high risk cytogenetics(17p-, t(4;14), t(14;16)), sex, age, ISS, chemotherapy, ASCT, CR/VGPR, normal PCs showed that the MFC MRD and ASCT were independent prognostic factor.Conclusions: Patients with MFC MRD negative after induction therapy or ASCT is a better prognostic marker than CR or even the best marker. Imaging MRD negativity and the appearance of normal plasma cells in the bone marrow suggests a better prognosis.We will have a try to do more research on overall survival(OS),include longer follow-up and a larger number of patients enrolled. Figure. Figure. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Role of Imaging in the Evaluation of Minimal Residual Disease in Multiple Myeloma Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 3519
Author(s):  
Elena Zamagni ◽  
Paola Tacchetti ◽  
Simona Barbato ◽  
Michele Cavo
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Imaging Techniques ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Minimal Residual

The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recently introduced the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) within the multiple myeloma (MM) response criteria, and MRD negativity assessed inside and outside the bone marrow is currently considered the most powerful predictor of favorable long-term outcomes. However, MRD evaluation has thus far relied on flow-cytometry or molecular-based methods, despite the limitations associated with the patchy infiltration of bone marrow (BM) plasma cells and the presence of extra-medullary (EMD). On the contrary, imaging-based sensitive response assessment through the use of functional rather than morphological whole-body (WB) imaging techniques, such as positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), likely is a promising strategy to overcome these limitations in evaluating response to therapy and in the assessment of the MRD status in MM patients. However, despite the significant advances in the development and availability of novel functional imaging techniques for MRD evaluation, a worldwide standardization of imaging criteria for acquisition, interpretation, and reporting is yet to be determined and will be object of future investigations.

scholarly journals Comparison of minimal residual disease detection in multiple myeloma between the DuraClone and EuroFlow methods

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takeshi Yoroidaka ◽  
Kentaro Narita ◽  
Hiroyuki Takamatsu ◽  
Momoko Fujisawa ◽  
Shinji Nakao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Total Cell ◽  
Multiparameter Flow Cytometry ◽  
Single Tube ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Minimal Residual

AbstractIn this study, the minimal residual disease (MRD) levels in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) were assessed by comparing the new 8-color single-tube multiparameter flow cytometry method (DuraClone), which reduces the cost of antibodies and labor burden of laboratories, with the EuroFlow next-generation flow (NGF) method. A total of 96 samples derived from 69 patients with MM were assessed to determine the total cell acquisition number (tCAN), percentages of total and normal plasma cells (PCs), and MRD levels using two methods. We found that the tCAN was significantly higher with EuroFlow-NGF than with DuraClone (median 8.6 × 106 vs. 5.7 × 106; p < 0.0001). In addition, a significant correlation in the MRD levels between the two methods was noted (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001). However, in the qualitative analysis, 5.2% (5/96) of the samples showed discrepancies in the MRD levels. In conclusion, the DuraClone is a good option to evaluate MRD in multiple myeloma but it should be used with caution.

Characterization of Clonal Pre-B Cell Progenitors of Plasma Cells In Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 1921-1921
Author(s):  
Lia Perez ◽  
Kelly Boucher ◽  
Nancy Parquet ◽  
Melissa Alsina ◽  
Rachid Baz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Stem Cell ◽  
Progenitor Cells ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Cell Activity ◽  
Notch 1 ◽  
Stem Cell Activity ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Abstract 1921 The lack of specific molecules to define the multiple myeloma (MM) malignant progenitor cells responsible for the development of the disease has hampered the evaluation of minimal residual disease (MRD) in MM. Syndecan (CD138) expression is limited to terminally differentiated plasma cells (PC) and studies of myeloma cell biology using CD138+ selected cells are limited in scope since earlier PC progenitors involved in the disease process are likely CD138 negative. We have identified a bone marrow (BM) CD138- subset that co-express CD19 with identical kappa or lambda light chain restriction as the abnormal plasma cells, as previously shown by others. Further characterization of CD138-/CD19+ cells (23% ± 18% of total BM cells) has shown that this subset co-expresses Notch-1 (90 ± 5%), c-Kit (20 ± 5%), CD20 (5 ± 2%), CD27 (20 ± 13%), CD34 (21 ± 15%) and lack CD56. CD138-/CD19+ cells represent two distinctive populations being CD34+/CD20- or CD34-/CD20+. A small percentage (1.1 ± 0.4%) of CD138-/CD19+ cells showed aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) activity. To further study MM BM progenitor we developed a multicolor flow cytometry assay to flow sort MM BM cell subsets allowing > 95% purity using a FACS Aria. Isolated BM populations were grown in methylcellulose supplemented with 5% PHA-leukocyte conditioned medium to detect progenitor cells committed to differentiate into mature PC. CD138+ cells did not form colonies, whereas CD138-/CD38+/CD19+/light chain+ regardless of CD34 expression grew colonies with a low efficiency of 1 in 25,000. However, only CD138-/CD38+/CD19+, but not CD34+ (HSC), differentiated into a mature syndecan (CD138+) expressing PC. Isolated CD138-/CD38+/CD19+ cells were relatively bortezomib and melphalan resistant when compared to CD138+ plasma cells. We hypothesize that the CD138-/CD38+/CD19+/CD34+ population contains earlier progenitor B cells that differentiate into the malignant PC. Surrogate assays for stem cell activity and xenotransplant models should determine cancer stem cell activity of these cells. Ongoing experiments will test whether Notch-1, CD34 or c-Kit expression is required for malignant PC progenitor function. Research studies of these CD138- MM putative progenitor cells will allow developing novel treatments to eradicate the MM minimal residual disease reservoir. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Automated Enumeration and Characterization of Circulating Multiple Myeloma Cells in Blood

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 1825-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Gross ◽  
Brad Foulk ◽  
Jaymala Patel ◽  
Mark Connelly ◽  
Marielena Mata
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Plasma Cells ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Myeloma Cells ◽  
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Healthy Donors ◽  
Two Samples ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Active Disease

Abstract Abstract 1825 Detection of circulating Multiple Myeloma cells (CMMC) by flow cytometry is an indicator of active disease. In addition, circulating plasma cells can be detected in earlier stages of disease, including MGUS and Smoldering Multiple Myeloma, and appear to correlate with prognosis. The capture and characterization of these circulating plasma cells from peripheral blood may provide novel biomarkers for the management of Multiple Myeloma patients, particularly in monitoring minimal residual disease and in progression from MGUS or Smoldering Multiple Myeloma to active disease. The enumeration and characterization of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with metastatic breast, prostate or colorectal cancer using the CellSearch® technology, has been shown to provide clinically relevant prognostic and predictive information. Here we describe the development of an automated assay for detecting circulating normal plasma cells (CPC) and multiple myeloma cells (CMMC) in blood using CellSearch. Assay results from Multiple Myeloma, MGUS patients, and from an aged matched control population are presented. The CellTracks® AutoPrep® System and CellTracks Analyzer II® systems were used to capture and enumerate CPC and CMMC. Magnetic particles conjugated to anti-CD138 are used to capture myeloma cells from 4.0mL of blood. Enriched cells are then stained with the nucleic acid dye DAPI and anti-CD38-Phycoerythrin (PE) antibody. Allophycocyanine (APC) conjugated anti-CD45 and anti-CD19 were used to exclude leukocytes and B-cells. In addition, FITC labeled anti-CD56 was added as a biomarker. The enriched and stained cells were transferred to a CellTracks® cartridge and MagNest® for magnetic mounting. The cartridge was scanned using the CellTracks Analyzer II®. Individual images of cells were presented to the operator for review, and scored as CMMCs, based on fluorescence and cell morphology. In a model spike-in system the assay consistently recovered ∼60% of the cells from the Multiple Myeloma cell line H929 spiked into 4.0mL of blood from healthy donors. The assay was linear over the tested range of from 0 to 2000 spiked H929 cells (r2 0.98, slope 0.50, intercept 10). The assay was validated using blood from age matched healthy donors (n=22) and patients with Multiple Myeloma (n=66) and MGUS (n=7). In 4.0mL blood from normal donors, 0 CPC were detected in 12/22 (55%) and low numbers (1–6 CPC) were detected in 10/22 (45%) samples. Interestingly, one CD56 positive CPC (CMMC?) was found in a normal donor. CMMC in Multiple Myeloma patients ranged from 0 – 17,000 /4.0mL blood. One or more CMMC were detected in 91% of the patients, > 5 in 68%, > 10 in 58% and > 100 in 35%. Expression of CD56 was highly variable in the patient population. CMMC in MGUS patients ranged from 0 – 112 /4.0mL blood. One or more CMMC were detected in 6/7 of the patients, > 5 in 4/6, > 10 in 2/6 and > 100 in 1/6. To further characterize CMMC, and differentiate CPC from CMMC, an interphase fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) assay was developed to be used with the capture and detection system described above. A four color FISH probe was used to simultaneously detect high risk mutations including two recurrent translocations of the IgH locus (t(4;14)(p16;q32) and t(14;16)(q32;q23)) as well as deletion of the TP53 locus (Δ17p13). The FISH assay was verified on cell lines H929, MM1s, and U266, which showed mutations at t(4;14), t(14;16) and Δ17p13, respectively. The FISH assay was tested on 9 CMMC patient samples and 8 samples yielded evaluable results. Two samples showed t(4;14)fusions, 3 patients showed aberrant FISH signal patterns indicating aneuploidy of chromosome 4 or 14 and the remaining patients showed normal FISH patterns. Well controlled prospective clinical studies are needed to establish the prognostic and predictive value of the presence, and characteristics, of CMMC in multiple myeloma or MGUS. In addition, as with CTC, this automated CMMC assay should prove useful in evaluating the effectiveness of new treatments as well as the assessment of potential treatment targets on CMMC in this difficult disease. Disclosures: Gross: Johnson and Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Foulk:Johnson and Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Patel:Johnson and Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Connelly:Johnson and Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership. Mata:Johnson and Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership.

Prognostic Impact of Minimal Residual Disease By ASO-RQ-PCR in Multiple Myeloma: A Pooled Analysis of 2 Phase III Studies in Patients Treated with Lenalidomide after Front-Line Therapy

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4409-4409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Oliva ◽  
Manuela Gambella ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Stefano Spada ◽  
Eleonora Marzanati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual Disease ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Standard Risk ◽  
Minimal Residual

Abstract Background: The prognostic utility of minimal residual disease (MRD) analysis in multiple myeloma (MM) patients has been well described in the last few years. The role of prolonged maintenance therapy even in persistent MRD negative patients is still unclear. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of MRD by allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (ASO-RQ-PCR) as predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) in newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) patients receiving Lenalidomide maintenance after frontline treatment. Patients and Methods: NDMM patients enrolled in the RV-MM-EMN-441 (NCT01091831) and the RV-MM-COOP-0556 (EMN02/HO95 MM) phase III trials achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR) after consolidation/intensification were included in the pooled MRD molecular analysis. After induction therapy, patients in the RV-MM-EMN-441 study were randomized to Cyclophosphamide-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone (CRD) or Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT); patients in the RV-MM-COOP-0556 were randomized to Bortezomib-Melphalan-Prednisone (VMP) vs ASCT (Gay F et al Lancet Oncol 2016, Cavo M et al J Clin Oncol 34, 2016 abstr 8000). All patients received Lenalidomide maintenance until progression or intolerance. MRD analysis was performed on bone marrow (BM) aspirates after intensification/consolidation, after 6 courses of maintenance and then every 6 months until clinical relapse. Patient-specific IgH rearrangements were amplified and directly sequenced from genomic DNA at diagnosis. IgH-based MRD detection by ASO-RQ-PCR was performed using an AbiPrism7900HT.MRD analysis was interpreted following the Euro-MRD guidelines(van der Velden VH et al. Leukemia 2007). Molecular-CR (m-CR) was defined as two consecutive negative MRD results by ASO-RQ-PCR with minimal sensitivity of 10−5. PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, curves were compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: a total of 105 patients entered the molecular MRD pooled study: a specific IgH molecular marker was identified in 73 patients (70%), 32 (30%) did not obtain a successful sequencing. Median age was 57 years (37-65); 30 (41%) patients had International Staging System (ISS) stage I, 33 (45%) stage II and 10 (14%) stage III. FISH risk profile was standard in 43 (59%) patients, high in 24 (33%) and not available in 6 (8%). Thirty-eight (52%) patients did not receive ASCT consolidation and 35 (48%) underwent ASCT. After consolidation/intensification 33/73 (45%) patients achieved m-CR: 19/35 (54%) ASCT patients and 14/38 (37%) no ASCT patients. The impact of m-CR on outcome after consolidation was explored: after a median follow-up of 44 months, median PFS was 48.8 months versus not reached in no m-CR vs m-CR patients, respectively (p=0.01). Lenalidomide maintenance further improved depth of MRD response: 11/40 (27%) MRD positive patients after consolidation obtained a m-CR during maintenance and a median of 2 natural logarithms of tumor burden reduction was recorded. In multivariable Cox analysis the risk of progression/death was higher for ISS stage II/III versus I (HR, 2.91, CI: 1.01-8.41, p=0.048), high-risk FISH versus standard-risk (HR, 2.23 CI: 0.81-6.10, p=0.12), age > 60 years versus ≤60 years (HR: 3.55, CI: 1.26-10.04, p=0.017) and patients who did not achieve m-CR during treatment versus patients who did (HR, 7.65 CI: 2.77-21.11, p<0.001). We identified a very high risk group defined by high risk FISH at diagnosis and persistent MRD positivity, with a median PFS of 29.4 months (figure1). Conclusions: MRD status by ASO-RQ-PCR is a predictor of outcome significantly superior to standard risk factors in NDMM patients and the achievement of m-CR seems to overcome the high risk FISH status in PFS analysis. Molecular CR rate and reduction of tumor burden obtained after consolidation can be enhanced with Lenalidomide maintenance. Based on these preliminary results, the assessment and monitoring of MRD should be suggested as a better prognostic indicator than CR, and the potential role of a MRD-guided therapy should be investigated in future prospective trials. Figure 1 PFS of patients stratified by MRD status (molecular-CR vs no molecular-CR) and FISH (high risk vs standard risk) Figure 1. PFS of patients stratified by MRD status (molecular-CR vs no molecular-CR) and FISH (high risk vs standard risk) Disclosures Oliva: Celgene: Honoraria; Takeda: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria. Larocca:Amgen, Celgene, BMS, Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria. Offidani:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Palumbo:Janssen Cilag: Honoraria; Takeda: Employment, Honoraria. Boccadoro:Sanofi, Celgene, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Abbivie, BMS: Honoraria; Celgene, Janssen, Amgen, BMS, Mundipharma, Novartis, Sanofi: Research Funding.

Using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for tracking of minimal residual disease in peripheral blood from patients with multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19525-e19525
Author(s):  
Marion Eveillard ◽  
Even Rustad ◽  
Mikhail Roshal ◽  
Yanming Zhang ◽  
Amanda Ciardiello ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Flow Cytometry ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Maldi Tof ◽  
Minimal Residual ◽  
Active Disease

e19525 Background: Minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity after completed therapy is associated with longer progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Current standard of care for MRD testing use flow cytometry and/or next generation sequencing (NGS)-based assays applied on bone marrow (BM) aspirate samples. To develop a strategy for MRD tracking in peripheral blood (PB), we were motivated to evaluate MALDI-TOF head-to-head with established bone marrow-based MRD assays. Methods: We used MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry to detect M-proteins in PB. Our cohort included patients who had serum samples available at 2 timepoints including during active disease and within 60 days of MRD results as determined by flow cytometry of BM aspirates. The cohort enrolled 71 patients (26 females, 45 males) with a median age of 61 years (37-78 years). Twenty-seven patients had high-risk cytogenetics at baseline. Patients were classified at diagnosis as ISS1 (n = 38), ISS2 (n = 18) or ISS3 (n = 6). The flow cytometry based MRD assay was performed using MSKCCs 10-color, single-tube method. MALDI-TOF analysis was performed as described by Mills et al. Samples taken during active disease were used to identify the mass/charge ratio of the M-protein at baseline and in follow-up samples. MALDI-TOF results were compared to flow cytometry bone marrow-based MRD results. Results: The median time between diagnosis and the MRD timepoint was 13.4 months (3.4-91 months). MALDI-TOF in PB and flow cytometry BM-based MRD results were concordant for 44/71 (62%) patients (8+/+, 36 -/- respectively) while 27 were discordant (10 +/-, 17-/+). Fifty-four of 71 patients were in complete response (CR) (45/54 in sCR) at the time of MRD. MALDI-TOF was still positive in 13 of these 54 CR patients. In this cohort, the median PFS since MRD assessment was not reached in the 2 subgroups of double negative patients (n = 31) or in patients with a positive result in at least one technique (n = 23) with a median follow-up of 11.2 months (0-34.6 months). Conclusions: In 44/71 (62%) samples, MALDI-TOF of PB results and flow cytometry BM-based MRD results were concordant. MALDI-TOF of PB may be useful for detecting measurable residual disease and for the monitoring of MM patients during maintenance therapy with the future goal to rule out early recurrent disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document