Phase III Trial of Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone for Pure and Mixed Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma: Intergroup Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 9402

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18) ◽  
pp. 2707-2714 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory Cairncross ◽  
Brian Berkey ◽  
Edward Shaw ◽  
Robert Jenkins ◽  
Bernd Scheithauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Radiation Therapy Oncology Group ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Anaplastic Oligodendroglioma ◽  
Allelic Loss ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Status ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose Anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AOA) are treated with surgery and radiotherapy (RT) at diagnosis, but they also respond to procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV), raising the possibility that early chemotherapy will improve survival. Furthermore, better outcomes in AO have been associated with 1p and 19q allelic loss. Patients and Methods Patients with AO and AOA were randomly assigned to PCV chemotherapy followed by RT versus postoperative RT alone. The primary end point was overall survival. The status of 1p and 19q alleles was assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results Two hundred eighty-nine eligible patients were randomly assigned to either PCV plus RT (n = 147) or RT alone (n = 142). At progression, 80% of patients randomly assigned to RT had chemotherapy. With 3-year follow-up on most patients, the median survival times were similar (4.9 years after PCV plus RT v 4.7 years after RT alone; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.24; P = .26). Progression-free survival time favored PCV plus RT (2.6 years v 1.7 years for RT alone; HR = 0.69; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.91; P = .004), but 65% of patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity, and one patient died. Patients with tumors lacking 1p and 19q (46%) compared with tumors not lacking 1p and 19q had longer median survival times (> 7 v 2.8 years, respectively; P ≤ .001); longer progression-free survival was most apparent in this subset. Conclusion For patients with AO and AOA, PCV plus RT does not prolong survival. Longer progression-free survival after PCV plus RT is associated with significant toxicity. Tumors lacking 1p and 19q alleles are less aggressive or more responsive or both.

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Patients Treated with NAb-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: The NAPA Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 887-895 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martina Catalano ◽  
Giandomenico Roviello ◽  
Raffaele Conca ◽  
Alberto D’Angelo ◽  
Valeria Emma Palmieri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Ductal Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
Prognostic And Predictive Markers

Background: The phase III MPACT trial demonstrated the superiority of gemcitabine (Gem) combined with Nab-paclitaxel (Nab-P) versus gemcitabine alone in previously untreated patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of Gem/Nab-P in routine clinical practice. Methods: From January 2015 to December 2018, patients with metastatic PDAC receiving firstline treatment with a combination of gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel were included in a multicentre retrospective observational study. Exploratory analyses of efficacy, and prognostic and predictive markers, were performed. Results: The cohort comprised 115 patients (median age 65 [range 50-84] years) with good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1). The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% CI; 9-13) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6 months (95% CI 5-7). Partial response and stable disease were achieved in 44 and 30 patients, respectively, yielding an overall disease control rate (DCR) of 64.3%. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicity frequency was 22.61% for neutropenia, 5.22% for anemia, and 3.48% for thrombocytopenia. Grade 3 asthenia was recorded in 2.61% of patients. No grade 4 non-hematological events were reported. Dose reduction was necessary in 51.3% of the patients. Conclusions: Our results confirm the efficacy and safety of a first-line regimen comprising gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel in metastatic PDAC in a real-life population.

Phase III Trial of Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) Compared With Infusional Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) As First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (13) ◽  
pp. 1670-1676 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfredo Falcone ◽  
Sergio Ricci ◽  
Isa Brunetti ◽  
Elisabetta Pfanner ◽  
Giacomo Allegrini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Peripheral Neurotoxicity ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

Purpose The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Methods Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR). Results A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032). Conclusion The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

A Prospective, Randomized, Phase III Study of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide (VMPT) Versus Bortezomib, Melphalan and Prednisone (VMP) in Elderly Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Patients

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 652-652 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Sara Bringhen ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
Valeria Magarotto ◽  
Francesco Di Raimondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Chromosomal Abnormalities ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Gastrointestinal Complications ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Weekly Infusion ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: In newly diagnosed myeloma patients the combination of bortezomib with melphalan-prednisone (VMP) was superior to MP. In relapsed-refractory patients the 4 drug combination of bortezomib-melphalan-prednisone-thalidomide (VMPT) induced a high proportion of complete responses (CR). Methods: Newly diagnosed myeloma patients (N=393) older than 65 years, from 58 centers in Italy, were randomly assigned to receive VMPT (N=193) or VMP (N=200). Initially, patients were treated with nine 6-week cycles of VMPT (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,4,8,11,22,25,29,32 in cycles 1–4 and days 1,8,22,29 in cycles 5–9; melphalan 9 mg/m2 days 1–4; prednisone 60 mg/m2 days 1–4 and thalidomide 50 mg days 1–42, followed by bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 every 15 days and thalidomide 50 mg/day as maintenance) or VMP (bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone at the same doses and schedules previously described without maintenance). In March 2007, the protocol was amended: both VMPT and VMP schedules were changed to nine 5-week cycles and bortezomib schedule was modified to weekly administration (bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 days 1,8,15,22 in cycles 1–9). Primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Patient characteristics were similar in both groups: median age was 71 years, 23% of patients were aged > 75 years. Patients who received at least 1 cycle were evaluated: 152 patients for VMPT (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion) and 152 patients for VMP (62 received bortezomib bi-weekly infusion and 90 weekly infusion). Data were analyzed in intention-to-treat. The very good partial response (VGPR) rate was higher in the VMPT group (55% versus 42%, p=0.02), including a CR rate of 31% in the VMPT group and 16% in the VMP group (p=0.003). In the subgroup treated with weekly infusion of bortezomib, VGPR was 59% for VMPT and 37% for VMP (p=0.004), including 28% CR for VMPT and 10% for VMP (p=0.004). Subgroup analyses did not show any statistical difference between responses and either age, B2-microglobulin or chromosomal abnormalities, such as del13, t(4;14), t(14;16) and del17. After a median follow-up of 13.6 months, the 2-year PFS was 83.9% in the VMPT group and 75.7% in the VMP group (HR=0.73, 95% CI 0.38–1.42, p=0.35). In patients who received weekly infusion of bortezomib, the 2-year PFS was 86.8% in the VMPT group and 78.1% in the VMP group (HR=0.65, 95% CI 0.24–1.8, p=0.41). In patients who achieved CR after induction, the 2-year PFS was 100% for VMPT and 79% for VMP (p=0.02). The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 89.5% in the VMPT group and 88.7% in the VMP group (HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.43–2.46, p=0.96). The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) was similar in both groups. In the VMPT patients and in the VMP patients, the more frequent AEs were neutropenia (36% vs 31%), thrombocytopenia (20% vs 19%), peripheral neuropathy (18% vs 12%), infections (14% vs 10%), and gastrointestinal complications (7% vs 8%), respectively. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly decreased the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (9% for VMPT and 3% for VMP). Conclusion: VMPT is superior to VMP in terms of response rates. Longer follow-up is needed to assess their effects on PFS and OS. The weekly infusion of bortezomib significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy without influencing outcome. Table. Complete responses, progression-free survival and peripheral neuropathy in all patients and in those who received weekly infusion of bortezomib VMPT group (n=152) VMP group (n=152) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) All patients (n=152) Subgroup with bortezomib weekly infusion (n=90) CR rate (%) 31 28 16 10 2-year PFS (%) 84 87 76 78 Grade 3–4 peripheral neuropathy (%) 18 9 12 3

Vinorelbine (VRB) plus gemcitabine (GEM) as first-line treatment for elderly patients (p) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Molecular correlates

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 18040-18040
Author(s):  
I. Maestu ◽  
D. Isla ◽  
P. Diz ◽  
J. Muñoz ◽  
J. Oramas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Activities Of Daily Living ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Daily Living ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Supraclavicular Lymph Nodes ◽  
Grade 3

18040 Background: The clinical benefit of non-cisplatin doublets vs a single agent in elderly or unfit p is still controversial. The present study focuses on clinical outcome with VRB/GEM in elderly p and the role of functional status and comorbidities. Genetic predictive markers of response to VRB/GEM will also be examined in genomic and cDNA from tumor and circulating tumor DNA. Methods: 145 chemonaive p with stage IIIB (pleural effusion or supraclavicular lymph nodes)-IV or recurrent NSCLC and age > 70 years were accrued at 32 sites between April 2004 and January 2006. Treatment consisted of VRB 25 mg/m2 IV or 60–80 mg/m2 oral plus GEM 1200 mg/m2, days 1, 8 every 21 days. Activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) and comorbidities were evaluated. DNA samples were collected from primary tumors for the assessment of microtubule associated protein 4 (MAP4) and from serum for the checkpoint with forkhead-associated and ring finger (CHFR) methylation. Results: Data on 130 p is available. Median age 76 years (69–83); males: 86.8%; smokers: 70.5%; PS 0–1: 83.9%; adenocarcinoma: 34.4% / squamous: 48%; stage IIIB: 22.7%, IV: 77.3%. Self-sufficiency in ADL and IADL was 77.4% and 45.2% of the p analyzed. 68% of the p had comorbidities. Median cycles: 3 (1–8). Hematological toxicities (%p): grade 3/4 neutropenia, 7.8%/4.7%; grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, 2.3%/0.8%; grade 3 anemia, 3.1%. Efficacy in evaluable population: PR, 23.2% (95% CI, 15.1% to 32.9%); SD, 41.1%. 24 p died during the treatment period (non toxicity related) and 21 p were not evaluable. With a median follow up of 5.8 months, median survival for the whole population was 4.97 months (m), progression free survival 4.53 m, event free survival 3.43 m, 1-year survival 26.6%. Statistically significant differences in median survival were observed among subgroups: PS 0–1/2, 6.5/2.3 m (p<0.001); sex male/female, 4.5/9.7 m (p 0.027); ADL <6/=6, 3.4/7.1 m (p 0.023). Conclusions: This trial confirms that VRB/GEM is effective, presenting a favorable toxicity profile in elderly p with advanced NSCLC. Complete data on genetic markers will be presented. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of picoplatin (pico) as second-line therapy for patients (pts) with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) who have resistant or refractory disease or have relapsed within 180 days of completing first-line, platinum (plat)-containing chemotherapy

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7722-7722 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bentzion ◽  
O. Lipatov ◽  
I. Polyakov ◽  
R. MacKintosh ◽  
J. Eckardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Median Survival ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Refractory Disease ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

7722 Background: Pico is a sterically hindered plat analogue designed to overcome plat resistance with improved safety and efficacy. In >600 pts pico had single-agent activity in lung, prostate, ovarian and other malignancies with rare significant nephro-, oto-, or neurotoxicity (∼2% grade 3 and 0% grade 4). In a previous phase 2 study of single agent pico as 2nd line therapy in SCLC, 4 of 48 pts (8%) had a partial response and 21 (44%) stable disease. Median survival was 27.0 (95% CI = 16–35) wks. This multi-center phase 2 trial was designed to confirm the activity of pico as 2nd line monotherapy for plat-resistant SCLC. Methods: Pts with SCLC who either 1) failed or progressed through 1st line plat-containing chemo (refractory disease), or 2) initially responded to 1st line plat-containing chemo and then relapsed/ progressed within 3 months (resistant disease), or 3) initially responded and then relapsed/progressed between 90 to 180 days (sensitive, relapsed 90 to 180 days), had measurable disease and ECOG PS 0–2 were treated with pico, 150 mg/m2 iv over1–2 hrs, q 21 days. Tumor response was assessed q 6 wks. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using the NCI CTCAE. Results: 77 pts received pico (45 refractory, 27 resistant, 5 sensitive). The median number of cycles received was 2 (mean = 2.9). The most frequently reported AEs of any severity were thrombocytopenia (39% of pts), anemia (35%), neutropenia (22%), nausea (20%), emesis (14%) and dyspnea (25%). Neutropenic fever occurred in 1 pt; there were no treatment related deaths. One pt had grade 3 neuropathy; there was no grade 3 or 4 ototoxicity or nephrotoxicity. Median overall survival is 28.1 (95% CI = 26–37) wks. Median progression free survival is 9.3 (95% CI = 7–12) wks. Of 63 pts with at least 1 post-treatment assessment of disease status, 33 (52%) had stable disease. Conclusion: Median survival compares favorably with other therapeutic options and toxicity is reduced in pico treated SCLC pts who have failed prior plat-containing first-line chemo or who have progressed within 180 days of first-line chemo. A phase III trial to confirm these results has been initiated. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Results of a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pegfilgrastim (PEG) in patients (pts) receiving first-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI and bevacizumab (B) for colorectal cancer (CRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3575-3575
Author(s):  
Tamas Pinter ◽  
Esteban Abella ◽  
Alvydas Cesas ◽  
Adina Croitoru ◽  
Jochen Decaestecker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3

3575 Background: The literature reports that adding biologics to chemotherapy (ctx) may increase the incidence of clinically significant neutropenia. his trial was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of PEG in reducing the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) in pts with locally-advanced (LA) or metastatic (m)CRC receiving first-line treatment with either FOLFOX/B or FOLFIRI/B. Methods: Key eligibility: ≥ 18 years old; measurable, nonresectable CRC per RECIST 1.1. Pts were randomly assigned 1:1 to either placebo or 6 mg PEG ~24 h after ctx/B. The study treatment period included four Q2W cycles, but pts could continue their assigned regimen until progression. Pts were stratified by region (North America vs rest of world), stage (LA vs mCRC), and ctx (FOLFOX vs FOLFIRI). Estimated sample size (N = 800) was based on the expected incidence of grade 3/4 FN (primary endpoint) across the first 4 cycles of ctx/B, powered for PEG superiority over placebo. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 845 pts were randomized (Nov 2009 to Jan 2012) and received study treatment; 783 pts completed 4 cycles of ctx/B. Median age was 61 years; 512 (61%) pts were male; 819 (97%) had mCRC; 414 (49%) received FOLFOX, and 431 (51%) received FOLFIRI. Grade 3/4 FN (first 4 cycles) for placebo vs PEG was 5.7% vs 2.4%; OR 0.41; p = 0.014. A similar incidence of other ≥ grade 3 adverse events was seen in both arms (28% placebo; 27% PEG). See table for additional results. Conclusions: PEG significantly reduced the incidence of grade 3/4 FN in this pt population receiving standard ctx/B for CRC. Follow-up is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00911170. [Table: see text]

Phase II study of sequential first-line pazopanib (PAZ) followed by everolimus (EVE) in patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (CATChEz Study).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 648-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. de Souza ◽  
Shirley Wong ◽  
Sanjeev Sewak ◽  
Dusan Kotasek ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Anticancer Treatment ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

648 Background: EVE following failure of sorafenib or sunitinib for RCC was first approved by the FDA in 2009. CATChEz (NCT01545817) was designed to test the activity of EVE following first-line PAZ in pts with advanced or metastatic RCC who had not received prior systemic therapy. Methods: From 2012 to 2016, pts received first-line PAZ followed by EVE until progressive disease (PD), death, unacceptable toxicity, consent withdrawal, or study termination. Pts with PD during or within 6 months of stopping PAZ were eligible for EVE. Pts off study treatment were evaluated for PD, survival, and updates on anticancer treatment every 8 weeks until death or end of study. The primary efficacy endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the second-line EVE treatment period; secondary endpoints included other survival measures, and safety evaluations were for second-line EVE and grade 3/4 toxicities attributable to PAZ and EVE. Results: Of 74 pts who started first-line PAZ, 38 received ≥1 dose of second-line EVE. The primary endpoint of mPFS from the start of second-line EVE and the secondary endpoint of mPFS with first-line PAZ (Table) were consistent with previous reports; no unexpected adverse events (AEs) were reported. All pts had ≥1 treatment-emergent AE, 83.8% had grade ≥3 AEs, and 71.6% had serious AEs. Of 34 total deaths, 29 were due to PD and 5 were due to AEs (2 related to EVE [lower respiratory tract infection; pulmonary sepsis]; 3 unrelated to study treatment). Conclusions: Efficacy and safety outcomes were consistent with published phase III data. The CATChEz study supports sequential first-line use of PAZ followed by EVE for the treatment of pts with advanced or metastatic RCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01545817. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase III Trial of Fluorouracil Alone Versus Fluorouracil Plus Cisplatin Versus Uracil and Tegafur Plus Mitomycin in Patients With Unresectable, Advanced Gastric Cancer: The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study (JCOG9205)

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 54-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Ohtsu ◽  
Yasuhiro Shimada ◽  
Kuniaki Shirao ◽  
Narikazu Boku ◽  
Ichinosuke Hyodo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Toxic Effects ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose: To compare fluorouracil (FU) alone with FU plus cisplatin (FP) and with uracil and tegafur plus mitomycin (UFTM) for patients with advanced gastric cancer in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Patients and Methods: A total of 280 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomly allocated and analyzed for survival, response, and toxicity. The survival curves were compared between groups by log-rank test on an intent-to-treat basis. Results: At the interim analysis, the UFTM arm showed a significantly inferior survival with higher incidences of hematologic toxic effects than did control arm FU alone, and the registration to UFTM was terminated. Both investigational regimens, FP and UFTM, had a significantly higher incidence of hematologic toxic effects than FU alone, although the effects were manageable. The overall response rates of the FU-alone, FP, and UFTM arms were 11%, 34%, and 9%, respectively. The median progression-free survival was 1.9 months with FU alone, 3.9 months with FP, and 2.4 months with UFTM, respectively. Although FP demonstrated a higher response rate (P < .001) and longer progression-free survival than did FU alone (P < .001), no differences in overall survival were observed between the arms. The median survival times and 1-year survival rates were 7.1 months and 28% with FU, 7.3 months and 29% with FP, and 6.0 months and 16% with UFTM, respectively. Conclusion: Neither investigational regimen, FP nor UFTM, showed a survival advantage as compared with FU alone. FU alone will remain a reference arm in our future trial for advanced gastric cancer.

Phase III study comparing cisplatin/vinorelbine plus cetuximab versus cisplatin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor (EGFR)-expressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (FLEX)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7109-7109 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Von Pawel ◽  
K. Park ◽  
J. R. Pereira ◽  
A. Szczesna ◽  
C. Yu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Time ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Safety Information ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
First Line

7109 Background: Cisplatin plus vinorelbine is a commonly used regimen for first-line therapy of advanced NSCLC, achieving response rates of 20–30% and median survival times of 6 to 11 months (mths). An earlier phase II trial investigated cetuximab in combination with cisplatin and vinorelbine in this setting and found improved response rates in the cetuximab arm, warranting this larger phase III trial. Methods: Patients (pts) with EGFR-expressing advanced NSCLC (stage IIIB with documented malignant pleural effusion and stage IV) were randomized 1:1 either to Group A (cetuximab 400 mg/m2 initial dose then 250 mg/m2 weekly, cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8) or to Group B (cisplatin and vinorelbine as before) for a maximum of 6 three-weekly cycles. Cetuximab was administered until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Primary endpoint is overall survival time; secondary endpoints are progression-free-survival, tumor response, disease control, safety, and quality of life. Enrollment of 1,100 pts was planned to show an increase of median survival time of 25% with 90% power. The Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) performed an independent preplanned safety analysis from the first 370 pts. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 weeks (2 cycles). Results: Since November 2004, 1,037 pts have been randomized, 689 are under treatment, and 348 pts have discontinued the study. Demographics of the first 370 pts reflected known advanced NSCLC characteristics: 91% stage IV, median age 60 yrs (31–79), 38% female, 80% ECOG PS 0/1, 52% adenocarcinoma, 30% squamous cell carcinoma; 29% never-smokers, 17% Asian. The ten most frequent adverse events were: nausea, neutropenia, vomiting, anorexia, fatigue, constipation, anemia, febrile neutropenia, rash, and diarrhoea. Conclusions: The trial continued after review of all relevant baseline and safety information from the first 370 pts. Recruitment is ongoing. [Table: see text]

Postoperative concurrent radiochemotherapy versus radiotherapy in high-risk SCCA of the head and neck: Results of the German phase III trial ARO 96–3

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5507-5507 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Fietkau ◽  
C. Lautenschläger ◽  
R. Sauer ◽  
J. Dunst ◽  
A. Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Acute Toxicity ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Distant Metastases ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Bed ◽  
Grade 3

5507 Background: Despite resection and postoperative irradiation high-risk (3 or more involved lymph nodes, extra-capsular disease and/or microscopically involved mucosal margins of resection) squamous cell carcinomas (SCCAs) of the head and neck frequently recur in the tumor bed. Postoperatively radiochemotherapy (RCT) with cis-Platin (CDDP)/5-FU versus radiotherapy (RT) alone was compared in a randomized trial. Methods: Between 5/97 and 12/04, 440 patients who had high-risk SCCAs of the head and neck were enrolled in this prospectively randomized phase III trial. Following resection and neck dissection, 214 patients were randomly assigned to RT (66 Gy/33 Fx/6.6 weeks) and 226 patients to identical RT plus CDDP (20 mg/m2 on day 1–5, 29–33) and 5-FU (600 mg/m2 on day 1–5, 29–33). Results: The 5 year local-regional control rate is 72.2 ± 3.7% following RT and 88.6 ± 2.4% for the RCT group (p = 0.00259; 5-year progression free survival 50.1 ± 4.0% and 62.4 ± 4.4% (p = 0.024) and 5-year overall survival 48.6 ± 4.4% vs. 58.1 ± 4.6% (p = 0.11). There was no difference in the 5 year incidence of distant metastases (19.3 ± 3.6% vs 25.5 ± 4.6%; p = 0.45). The incidence of grade 3+ acute toxicity was higher during RCT: mucositis 12.6% vs. 20.8% (p = 0.04), leucopenia 0% vs. 4.4% (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Acute toxicity is increased to an acceptable level by RCT. Postoperative RCT compared to RT improves locoregional control and progression free survival; thus survival as a trend is improved by 10% after 5 years. Supported by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70–2140. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document