Use of growth factors associated with docetaxel and paclitaxel in patients with early-stage breast cancer in a community oncology center
e17548 Background: Docetaxel and paclitaxel are widely used in treating breast cancer (BC), and both have hematologic toxicity commonly managed by costly growth factors (GFs). However, the extent of GFs use in real-world clinical practice has not been well documented. Methods: The Georgia Oncology Specialist Database was used and contained chemotherapy, medical and pharmacy claims, and lab results for nearly 170,000 patients with various types of cancer (2003–2008). Patients with stage I-III BC receiving docetaxel- or paclitaxel-containing regimens as adjuvant therapy were followed from 1 week prior to docetaxel or paclitaxel (index drug) initiation to the earliest of death, loss to follow-up, switch in taxane, or end of 90-day period post last dose of index drug. Incidence of GFs use per person-year was compared using univariate negative binomial (NB) model, median time to first GFs use was compared using Wilcoxon test. Multivariate analyses were performed on number of utilizations and time to first utilization adjusting for potential confounders. Results: Compared with paclitaxel (n = 433), docetaxel cohort (n = 216) had lower incidence per person-year of erythroid stimulating agents (ESAs) use (8.01 vs. 11.72, p = 0.008), while similar incidence of myeloid growth factors (MGFs) use (8.51 vs. 5.07, p = 0.541). Lower MGFs utilization in docetaxel patients (ratio of number of utilization = 0.821, p = 0.033), and similar ESAs utilization (ratio of number of utilization = 0.920, p = 0.305) were found. While descriptive analysis showed paclitaxel patients received first ESAs sooner than docetaxel patients (median length: 23 vs. 7 days, p < 0.001), and no difference in time to first MGFs use (median 8 days for both); multivariate analyses found docetaxel patients received first MGFs sooner (ratio of days = 0.828, p = 0.039), and no difference in time to first ESAs use (ratio of days = 1.091, p = 0.419). Conclusions: This analysis suggests that docetaxel is associated with lower utilization of MGFs. Studies examining the economic impact of GFs use associated with taxanes will need to be conducted. A potential limitation of this study is that the potential selection bias may not be fully adjusted. [Table: see text]