A retrospective analysis of nonmetastatic primary mucosal melanoma of the vagina: Clinical practice evaluation in different French institutes.

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15500-e15500
Author(s):  
C. Vaysse ◽  
P. Pautier ◽  
T. Filleron ◽  
V. Maisongrosse ◽  
V. Lavoué ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
pp. 20201368
Author(s):  
Akash Prashar ◽  
Saqib Butt ◽  
Davide Giuseppe Castiglione ◽  
Nadeem Shaida

Objectives: Obtaining informed consent is a mandatory part of modern clinical practice. The aim of this study was to identify how often complications relating to Interventional Radiology (IR) procedures were discussed with the patient prior to the procedure. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients who experienced a complication related to an IR procedure was performed. The patient’s procedure consent form was examined to identify whether the complication they experienced had been discussed as a possible risk. Other parts of the consent form relating to need for blood transfusion and the need for further procedures were also examined. Results: 39% of patients who experienced a complication did not have the complication documented as a potential risk on the consent form. 14% of patients required a blood transfusion but were not consented for this. 42% of patients required a further procedure or operation but were not warned of this. Conclusion: The model of gaining informed consent on the day of procedure is no longer valid. Better education and the use of clinics, patient information sheets and other resources is essential. Advances in knowledge: The paper highlights the inadequacies of the current model in gaining consent for IR procedures. A more comprehensive consent process making use of all available resources is essential.


2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (7) ◽  
pp. 1879-1884 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Gamala ◽  
S. P. Linn-Rasker ◽  
M. Nix ◽  
B. G. F. Heggelman ◽  
J. M. van Laar ◽  
...  

Respiration ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shion Miyoshi ◽  
Kazutoshi Isobe ◽  
Hiroshige Shimizu ◽  
Motoko Sunakawa ◽  
Aika Suzuki ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A236.2-A236
Author(s):  
A Garcia ◽  
A Rodriguez ◽  
G Durán ◽  
E López ◽  
M Touris ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 521-524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shofiq Islam ◽  
Jennifer L Cole ◽  
Christopher J Taylor

Objectives The British honours system is one of the oldest in the world rewarding individuals, including those of the medical profession. The authors were interested to see if any particular specialty was honoured to a greater extent. We aimed to establish the number of those honoured, the duration of clinical practice involved, as well as additional factors. Design A retrospective analysis of doctors receiving honours (Knight/Dame, CBE, OBE, MBE) in the last decade was performed. Setting UK-registered doctors. Participants Doctors were identified from publicly available listings. Main outcome measures Demographics of all honoured doctors, including number of years of service, specialty affiliation and the number of recipients holding professorial status were collected. Clinicians were stratified into four subgroups: General Practitioners, Physicians, Surgeons and Others. Data were analysed using parametric statistical tests. Results Four hundred and seventeen doctors were identified. Four hundred and two clinicians had a documented subspecialty affiliation. Of the 402: GPs ( n = 142), Physicians ( n = 100), Surgeons ( n = 34) and Others ( n = 126). The number of years in clinical practice from registration to conference of honours was significantly shorter for GPs when compared to hospital-based specialties ( P < 0.05). The top 10 specialties of individuals honoured are tabulated. Professors constituted 30% ( n = 131) of those honoured. These individuals were sub-divided according to specialty affiliation with a significant difference observed ( P < 0.05). Conclusions The most honoured specialty was General Practice. However, when corrected for total subspecialty population, the number one ranking specialty was Public Health Medicine. Academic clinicians are well represented. The findings may be of interest to the medical community.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document