Dosimetric comparison of radiotherapy plans for left-sided breast cancer patients in rolled versus supine body position.
124 Background: Left-sided breast cancer patients receiving whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT) are potentially at increased risk for cardiac morbidity. We evaluated heart sparing of left-sided breast cancer patients when placed in the rolled vs. the standard supine body position for WBRT. Methods: Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent planning CT scans in 2 different positions: supine and rolled to the right to allow for the heart to drop away from the chest wall. Patients were immobilized using vacuum cradles. The left lung, opposite breast, stomach, heart, left ventricle (LV), and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) were defined as organs at risk (OARs). Comparison 3D conformal tangential field plans were generated for each patient. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the planning target volume (PTV) and OARs were examined. Results: All plans met PTV dose coverage and homogeneity criteria of V95 > 95% and maximal dose < 108. Median V105 for PTV was 12.75% (range, 2.5-16%). None of these parameters differed either statistically or clinically between plans done with the patient supine or rolled. The maximal doses to the opposite breast and stomach were also not significantly different between the 2 positions. The right lung V20 was similar for the 2 positions, 11.1% and 12%. Although there were no significant differences in the mean and max doses to the heart or LV, the mean heart dose decreased by 18-70% in 6 patients in the rolled vs. supine position and increased by 2.7-31.5% in 4 patients. The mean dose to the LAD and the LAD V10 and V15 were significantly decreased when the patient was rolled: 17.1 vs. 29.5 Gy, 41.1% vs. 62.6% and 40% vs. 66.7% (p < .05), respectively. Six patients had superior plans when in the rolled position with substantial differences in the mean and/or max doses and/or DVHs for the heart, LV and LAD. The remaining 4 patients had no overall improvement or worsening of the plan when the patient was rolled vs. supine. Conclusions: For patients with left-sided breast cancer receiving WBRT, the rolled position potentially reduces dose to the heart and its substructures without compromising the coverage and homogeneity of the PTV, hence limiting the need for IMRT.