A phase I study of MDM2 antagonist RG7112 in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13600-e13600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razelle Kurzrock ◽  
Jean-Yves Blay ◽  
Binh Bui Nguyen ◽  
Andrew J. Wagner ◽  
Robert G. Maki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Mdm2 Gene ◽  
Ki 67 ◽  
Mdm2 Antagonist ◽  
Flt Pet ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
P53 Activation

e13600^ Background: RG7112 is a small molecule MDM2 antagonist, designed to non-genotoxically activate p53. A phase I dose escalation (DE) was performed, followed by a sarcoma biomarker extension (EXT) in pts with wild type TP53. Methods: 106 pts (58M, 48 F), median age 57.9 yrs (range 22-84) participated; 76 in 9 cohorts (DE) from 20 to 1800 mg/m2, orally QD x 10 q28 days. 30 pts with sarcoma were treated at MTD (2500 mg) (EXT) with pre-and on dose (d5+/-2) biopsies. Analyses included TP53 mutation (AmpliChip), MDM2 amplification (ISH), p53 and p21 IHC, MDM2 RT-PCR, Ki-67, TUNEL and [18F]-FLT-PET. Blood was obtained for PK and MIC-1, a PD marker of p53 activation. Results: DE: MTD was1440 mg/m2/d (2500 mg flat dose). PK was ~dose linear (t½ 1-1.5 d) with high variability (CV~70%) in AUC and Cmax . Adverse events included nausea/GI and exposure-related neutropenia/thrombocytopenia. 3 DLTs: diarrhea, pancytopenia, hyponatremia occurred (at ≥ 640 mg/m2). Evidence of activity included: 1) concentration dependent increase in plasma MIC-1 (% baseline), 2) decrease in [18F]-FLT PET and PR each in liposarcoma pts at 1800 mg/m2 and 1440 mg/m2, respectively. EXT: Grade3/ 4 cytopenias at MTD precluded subsequent cycles in 6/8 pts (10 day schedule). Dosing was changed to 5 days, and only 3 patients had Gr3/4 cytopenias. 8/22 pts remained on study for >4 cycles, including 2 pts with SD for 7 and 9 cycles respectively. 3 of 4 EXT pts had decreased [18F]-FLT-PET activity. Biopsies (pre- and on treatment) demonstrated: 1) increase in p53 (median 1.5 fold change (X) by IHC, n=15); 2) increase in p21 (median 2.7X by IHC, n=14); 3) increase in MDM2 (median 2.5X by RT-PCR, n = 27); 4) decrease in % Ki-67(+) cells (median % change from baseline -65.4%, range -91% to +275%, n=17 ); 5) increase in TUNEL(+) cells of 9.0 (density of + cells/mm2, range -26.2 to +45.5, n=22). These results were seen both in tumors with and without MDM2 gene amplification, and in multiple sarcoma subtypes. Conclusions: RG7112 has manageable AEs (GI ) and cytopenias correlating with AUC. Single agent disease control, and biomarker activity was seen in both MDM2 amplified and non-amplified, heavily pretreated soft tissue sarcoma pts, with changes reflecting activation of p53-related pathways.

scholarly journals MDM2 Antagonists Induce a Paradoxical Activation of Erk1/2 through a P53-Dependent Mechanism in Dedifferentiated Liposarcomas: Implications for Combinatorial Strategies

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2253
Author(s):  
Shomereeta Roy ◽  
Audrey Laroche-Clary ◽  
Stephanie Verbeke ◽  
Marie-Alix Derieppe ◽  
Antoine Italiano
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Mapk Pathway ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Immunoblot Analysis ◽  
Mek Inhibitor ◽  
Mitogen Activated Protein Kinase ◽  
Synergistic Activity ◽  
Mdm2 Gene ◽  
Mdm2 Antagonist ◽  
The Impact

The MDM2 gene is amplified in dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS). Treatment with MDM2 antagonists is a promising strategy to treat DDLPS; however, drug resistance is a major limitation when these drugs are used as a single agent. This study examined the impact of MDM2 antagonists on the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway in DDLPS and investigated the potential synergistic activity of a MAPK kinase (MEK) inhibitor in combination with MDM2 antagonists. We identified a synergistic effect and identified the mechanism behind it. Combination effects of MDM2 antagonists and a MEK inhibitor were analyzed in a patient-derived xenograft mouse model and in DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma cell lines using different cell proliferation assays and immunoblot analysis. MDM2 antagonist (RG7388)-resistant IB115 [P4] cells and p53-silenced DDLPS cells were also established to understand the importance of functional p53. We found that MDM2 antagonists induced an upregulation of phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK) in DDLPS cells. The upregulation of p-ERK occurred due to mitochondrial translocation of p53, which resulted in increased production of reactive oxygen species, causing the activation of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Activated RTKs led to the activation of the downstream MEK/ERK signaling pathway. Treatment with a MEK inhibitor resulted in decreased expression of p-ERK, causing significant anti-tumor synergy when combined with MDM2 antagonists. Our results provide a framework for designing clinical studies of combination therapies in DDLPS patients.

Phase I trial of tirapazamine in combination with cisplatin in a single dose every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 773-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
C A Johnson ◽  
D Kilpatrick ◽  
R von Roemeling ◽  
C Langer ◽  
M A Graham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Plasma ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
A Minor

PURPOSE AND METHODS Tirapazamine (SR4233, WIN 59075) is a benzotriazine-di-N-oxide bioreductive agent that is selectively activated to a reactive DNA-damaging species in hypoxic tumors. Preclinical studies show that synergistic antitumor activity results from a schedule-dependent interaction between tirapazamine and several cytotoxic drug classes, including cisplatin. In a phase I combination study, tirapazamine (130 to 260 mg/m2) was administered as a 1-hour intravenous (IV) infusion beginning 3 hours before cisplatin (75 to 100 mg/m2). Thirteen patients received 41 courses of therapy. These patients had an excellent performance status and were not heavily pretreated. The predominant diagnosis was lung cancer. RESULTS The major acute side effects were nausea and vomiting, which were controlled with an intensive antiemetic regimen. Other acute effects included diarrhea and muscle cramping, while with repeated dosing, anorexia and fatigue predominated. Full doses of each agent were well tolerated in combination, although in this previously treated population, fatigue increased markedly after three cycles of therapy. Partial responses were observed in two patients (one with non-small-cell lung cancer and one with breast cancer), and a minor response occurred in a patient with mesothelioma. Tirapazamine pharmacokinetics were linear with respect to increasing dose with a mean maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of 5.97 +/- 2.25 microg/mL and an area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 811.4 +/- 311.9 microg/mL.min at 260 mg/m2. These results are consistent with other ongoing single-agent and combination studies and indicate that therapeutically relevant levels of tirapazamine are achievable in patients based on animal models. The mean cisplatin AUC was 285.6 +/- 46.4 microg/mL.min with mean Cmax values of 3.38 +/- 0.43 microg/mL at 75 mg/m2. The clearance of cisplatin was unaffected by coadministration with tirapazamine. CONCLUSION This trial shows that in previously treated patients, full doses of cisplatin are well tolerated with increasing doses of tirapazamine up to 260 mg/m2. The observation of clinical responses in this trial supports the phase II investigation of this regimen.

SAR650984, a CD38 Monoclonal Antibody In Patients With Selected CD38+ Hematological Malignancies- Data From a Dose-Escalation Phase I Study

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 284-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas G Martin ◽  
Stephen A. Strickland ◽  
Martha Glenn ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Nikki Daskalakis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Hematological Malignancies ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

Abstract Background SAR650984 (SAR) is a naked humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) that binds selectively to the human surface antigen CD38 highly expressed in multiple myeloma cells and other hematological malignancies. SAR kills tumor cells via 3 different biological mechanisms: Antibody-dependent cellular-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and Induction of apoptosis (pro-apoptosis). Here we present preliminary data from the ongoing first in human, Phase I dose escalation study of SAR in patients with selected CD38+ hematological malignancies. (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01084252) Objectives The primary objective is to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Secondary objectives include characterization of safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity and disease response. Methods SAR is administered as a single agent IV infusion every week (QW) or every 2 weeks (Q2W) to adult patients with selected CD38+ hematological malignancies who have progressed on or after standard therapy or for whom no effective standard therapy exists. An accelerated dose escalation schedule was used for the first 5 dose levels (DL) (0.0001 mg/kg to 0.1 mg/kg Q2W), with one evaluable patient per DL unless DLT was experienced. All subsequent DL (0.3 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, 3 mg/kg, 5mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, 20 mg/kg Q2W and 10 mg/kg QW), followed the classic 3+3 design for dose escalation based on DLT. Results 32 patients have been treated across all DLs including 3 patients with NHL, 2 with CLL, and 27 with MM. The 20 mg/kg Q2W and 10 mg/kg QW DLs are currently being evaluated and the MTD has not been reached. DLTs have been limited to Grade (G) 2 infusion reactions during cycle 1 with 1 at DL 0.3 mg/kg and 1 at DL 3.0 mg/kg. This was mitigated by the implementation of routine pretreatment with methylprednisone, diphenhydramine, ranitidine and acetaminophen. The most frequent occurring adverse events (≥ 10%) all DL, regardless of causality, are fatigue (46.9%), nausea (31.3%), pyrexia (28.1%), cough (25%), vomiting (21.9%), hypercalcemia (18.8%), with headache, constipation, bone pain, chills and diarrhea each occurring in 15.6% of patients. In addition, pneumonia, anemia, dysgeusia and hypokalemia each occurred in 12.5% of patients. Serious adverse events considered related to therapy include G 3 pneumonia (6.3%) associated with fever (3.1%), hyperglycemia (3.1%) and one Grade 2 infusion reaction (3.1%). Of the 19 patients treated at DL 1.0 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg Q2W, 1 had CLL, 1 had NHL and 17 had MM. The 17 MM patients were older and heavily pretreated patients; median age of 64 years (range: 55-74); and median of seven prior regimens (range: 2-14). All MM patients had received prior lenalidomide and bortezomib. The median time from diagnosis to first SAR650984 dosing was 6. 8 years (range 1.8 – 16.8 years). Responses in this group (fig 1), according to EBMT MM criteria, included 1 PR at 1 mg/kg (n = 3) and 5 mg/kg (n=3), and 1 MR at DL 3 mg/kg (n = 6). The 10 mg/kg DL demonstrated 3 PR and 2 SD among 6 MM patients treated. For the 19 patients treated at or above the 1 mg/kg DL the median time on treatment is 8 weeks (range 2-50 weeks). Immunogenicity studies show no anti-SAR antibodies. Receptor Occupancy could be detected from DL 1 mg/kg and reached a range of 84.1 to 97.7 % at 10 mg/kg. PK analysis show a more than dose proportional increase of exposure over the 0.03 to 10 mg/kg dose range with clearance in a similar range between 5 mg/kg and 10 mg/kg. No accumulation was observed based on Cmax at cycle 2 over the 0.03 to 3 mg/kg dose range. Tumor growth inhibition threshold was reached at Cmax for 1 patient at DL 5 mg/kg and 5 patients at DL 10 mg/kg. Conclusion The safety profile of SAR is predictable and manageable and the MTD has not been reached. SAR demonstrates encouraging single agent activity in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM and warrants further evaluation in this patient population. Disclosures: Zheng: sanofi: Employment. Daskalakis:sanofi: Employment.

A phase I dose escalation study to evaluate safety and tolerability of cabazitaxel (Cbz) as a single agent in patients (pts) with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who have failed prior chemotherapy (CT) regimens (GASTANA).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 141-141
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Baek-Yeol Ryoo ◽  
Shinkyo Yoon ◽  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jooyun Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Gastric Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Xenograft Model ◽  
Human Gastric Cancer ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Advanced Gastric Adenocarcinoma

141 Background: Cbz showed antitumor activity in a CT-resistant human gastric cancer xenograft model. The Phase I GASTANA study aimed to determine the safety profile of Cbz in pts with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma who failed prior CT regimens. Methods: Asian pts with metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma failing 2 prior CT regimens received Cbz (single agent, Day 1 of every 3-week cycle) in a standard 3+3 dose escalation design. Dose levels (DL) were 20 mg/m2 (DL 1), 25 mg/m2 (DL 2) and 15 mg/m2 (DL -1). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Prophylactic G-CSF was not permitted at cycle 1. Results: Fifteen pts were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) at cycle 1. All pts were heavily pretreated (median of 2 prior anticancer regimens), and 11 had prior taxane exposure.At DL 1, no DLTs occurred in any of the first 3 pts. At DL 2, 4 pts were enrolled as 1 pt discontinued prematurely, with only 1 DLT (Grade [Gr] 4 febrile neutropenia [FN]) observed. However, all 4 pts at DL 2 experienced FN, and so 3 more pts were enrolled at DL 1 to further explore safety at this lower DL. Two DLTs (Gr 4 neutropenia > 7 days) occurred in these additional 3 pts. In response, DL -1 was opened, with no DLTs observed in the 6 pts enrolled. The median numbers of cycles were 5 (DL 1), 1.5 (DL 2) and 3 (DL -1). Frequent Gr 3/4 toxicities (safety population, N = 16) included neutropenia (63%) and FN (38%). Best overall responses included 1 partial response (6.3%; DL -1) and 8 stable disease (50%). Conclusions: Due to the unexpectedly high incidence of neutropenia-related complications compared with pts with other cancer types, a further Phase II study of Cbz was put on hold pending further data in pts with gastric cancer. The frequent occurrence of neutropenic complications with Cbz in this study may be attributed in part to the heavily pretreated nature of the pts and the accumulated toxicity of prior taxane therapy. Also, prophylactic G-CSF use after cycle 1 was not mandatory in pts with dose interruptions due to neutropenia, which may have increased the rate of neutropenic complications in subsequent cycles. Clinical trial information: NCT01497964.

MOR202 with low-dose dexamethasone (Dex) and in combination with pomalidomide/dex and lenalidomide/dex in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Interim analysis of a phase I/IIa dose-escalation study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8024-8024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Raab ◽  
Manik Chatterjee ◽  
Hartmut Goldschmidt ◽  
Hermine Agis ◽  
Igor W. Blau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Tumor Control ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Transmembrane Glycoprotein ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

8024 Background: CD38 is a type II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by MM cells. MOR202, a human IgG1 CD38 monoclonal antibody, has shown high single-agent activity in preclinical models of MM and synergy in combination with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), lenalidomide (LEN) and pomalidomide (POM). Methods: This interim analysis of a multicenter phase I/IIa study reports safety and efficacy data from RRMM patient (pt) cohorts treated with clinically relevant doses of MOR202 (2-hour IV infusion; 4, 8 and 16 mg/kg q1w) + Dex (≤40 mg), or at 8 or 16 mg/kg q1w with an IMiD/Dex. Primary objectives were to evaluate the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose of MOR202. Results: As of January 2017, 79 pts had been treated, including 44 in clinically relevant cohorts: 18 received MOR202 + Dex, 15 MOR202 + LEN/Dex and 11 MOR202 + POM/Dex. Pts had received a median of 3, 2 and 3 prior treatment lines, respectively. The MTD of MOR202 was not reached. Combinations were generally well tolerated, with grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) mainly hematological; 2 pts discontinued due to a MOR202-related AE (one grade 4 thrombocytopenia; one grade 3 acute kidney failure). Infusion-related reactions (all grade 1 or 2) were seen in only 3/44 (7%) pts, and mainly occurred during the first infusion. In the MOR202 + Dex cohort, 5/17 (29%) evaluable pts (receiving at least 1 cycle of treatment) had a response, including 3 with partial responses (PRs) and 2 with very good PRs (VGPRs). Responses were also seen in 11/13 (85%, 8 PRs, 3 VGPRs) evaluable pts in the MOR202 + LEN/Dex cohort and 5/9 (56%, 2 complete responses, 3 PRs) in the MOR202 + POM/Dex cohort. Longest response duration was 17 months (MOR202/Dex). Preliminary analysis showed preservation of high CD38 levels on MM cells under MOR202 therapy. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with RRMM, a 2-hour infusion of MOR202 administered at up to 16 mg/kg with Dex or in combination with an IMiD/Dex, showed a favorable safety profile, including excellent infusion tolerability. Promising preliminary efficacy and long-lasting tumor control was seen. Clinical trial information: NCT01421186.

scholarly journals Phase I Trial of Oral Irinotecan and Temozolomide for Children With Relapsed High-Risk Neuroblastoma: A New Approach to Neuroblastoma Therapy Consortium Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 1290-1296 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars M. Wagner ◽  
Judith G. Villablanca ◽  
Clinton F. Stewart ◽  
Kristine R. Crews ◽  
Susan Groshen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Time Curve ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeIrinotecan and temozolomide have single-agent activity and schedule-dependent synergy against neuroblastoma. Because protracted administration of intravenous irinotecan is costly and inconvenient, we sought to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of oral irinotecan combined with temozolomide in children with recurrent/resistant high-risk neuroblastoma.Patients and MethodsPatients received oral temozolomide on days 1 through 5 combined with oral irinotecan on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12 in 3-week courses. Daily oral cefixime was used to reduce irinotecan-associated diarrhea.ResultsFourteen assessable patients received 75 courses. Because neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were initially dose-limiting, temozolomide was reduced from 100 to 75 mg/m2/d for subsequent patients. Irinotecan was then escalated from 30 to 60 mg/m2/d. First-course grade 3 diarrhea was dose-limiting in one of six patients treated at the irinotecan MTD of 60 mg/m2/d. Other toxicities were mild and reversible. The median SN-38 lactone area under the plasma concentration versus time curve at this dose was 72 ng · hr/mL. One patient with bulky soft tissue disease had a complete response through six courses. Six additional patients received a median of seven courses (range, three to 22 courses) before progression.ConclusionThis all-oral regimen was feasible and well tolerated in heavily pretreated children with resistant neuroblastoma, and seven (50%) of 14 assessable patients had response or disease stabilization for three or more courses in this phase I trial. SN-38 lactone exposures were similar to those reported with protracted intravenous irinotecan. The dosages recommended for further study in this patient population are temozolomide 75 mg/m2/d plus irinotecan 60 mg/m2/d when given with cefixime.

scholarly journals Phase I trial of the polo-like kinase (Plk) inhibitor volasertib (BI 6727) combined with cisplatin or carboplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3018-3018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herlinde Dumez ◽  
Andrea Gombos ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Thierry Gil ◽  
Christof Vulsteke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
B 31

3018^ Background: Volasertib (V) is a first in class, selective and potent cell cycle kinase inhibitor that induces mitotic arrest and apoptosis by targeting Plk. This phase I study evaluates dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and pharmacokinetics (PK) of V combined with cisplatin (Cis) or carboplatin (Ca). Methods: Sequential cohorts of patients (pts) received a single 2h infusion of V with Cis (arm A) or Ca (arm B) every 3 wks. Cis and Ca were given for up to 6 cycles (Cy); V was continued until progression or intolerance. MTD was the highest dose at which ≤1/6 pts experienced a DLT in Cy 1. MTD cohorts were expanded to 12 DLT-evaluable pts to further characterize safety. Results: As of January 11 2012, 61 pts (arm A: 30; arm B: 31) were treated. Pt characteristics were (arm A/B): median age 55/58 yrs, male 16/18 pts, ECOG PS 0: 13/14 pts, PS 1: 17/17 pts. Tumors included (pts): non-small cell lung cancer (15); sarcoma (8); colorectal cancer (6); melanoma (4); urothelial cancer (4); other (24). Pts received V + Cis for a median [range] of 3.5 Cy [1-6], V + Ca for 2 Cy [1-6] and V for 3.5 Cy [1-20] in arm A and 2 Cy [1-14] in B. PK analyses are ongoing. MTD was reached at V 300 mg + Cis 100 mg/m2 and V 300 mg + Ca AUC 6. Five partial responses (PR) were seen. 15/30 pts in arm A and 12/31 in B achieved stable disease (SD) or PR. PR or SD for >6 Cy was observed in 6/30 pts and 5/31 pts in arms A and B, respectively. Conclusions: In this phase I study, V in combination with Cis or Ca at full single-agent doses was well tolerated. Furthermore, several objective responses and cases of sustained SD were observed in heavily pretreated pts with advanced solid tumors.[Table: see text]

Phase I/II Study of MGCD0103, an Oral Isotype-Selective Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitor, in Combination with 5-Azacitidine in Higher-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) and Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 444-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Allen S. Yang ◽  
Virginia Klimek ◽  
Jorge Cortes ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hdac Inhibitor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Substantial Reduction ◽  
Myelogenous Leukemia ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Flat Dose ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Epigenetic alterations are common in leukemia. MGCD0103 in an oral isotype-selective HDAC inhibitor that synergizes in vitro with the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5-azacitidine (Vidaza, Pharmion). Both agents have single-agent clinical activity in MDS and AML (Garcia-Manero, ASCO, 2006 & Silverman, JCO, 2002). We have developed a Phase I/II study of 5-azacitidine in combination with MGCD0103 in patients with AML and MDS. Patients with MDS (≥10% marrow blasts), relapsed/refractory AML, or untreated elderly patients with AML were eligible. Adequate performance status, renal and hepatic functions were required. 5-azacitidine was administered at its approved dose/schedule: 75 mg/m2 SC daily for the first 7 days of a 28 day cycle. MGCD0103 was administered as a flat dose orally three-times a week starting on the 5th day of 5-azacitidine administration. The phase I portion of the study design followed a classic “3+3” model and only MGCD0103 was dose escalated. The phase II portion targeted a 30% response rate. Final data from the Phase I and II portions of the study will be presented at the Meeting. Five dose levels of MGCD0103 have been evaluated: 35, 60, 90, 110 and 135 mg. At current data cut-off, 37 patients registered in the study were fully evaluable: median age was 67 (range 27–85); 31 patients had AML and 6 MDS. A total of 97 cycles were administered to date, mean = 2.6 (range 1–12). Dose limiting toxicities included nausea, vomiting, anorexia, diarrhea and dehydration which appear similar to dose limiting toxicities for MGCD0103 alone. The MTD of MGCD0103 was initially determined to be 110 mg, however, upon cohort expansion, this dose level was associated with excess toxicity and the starting dose was decreased to 90 mg. Eleven (30%) patients have achieved response: 4 CR, 5 CR-i, and 2 PR. Of these 11 patients, 6 continue on study with mean duration on study of 7 cycles. Of the 5 patients discontinued, 3 discontinued due to SAEs, 1 due to progressive disease and 1 to undergo transplantation. Of the 27 patients at the phase II dose levels of 90 and 110mg, 10 achieved a response (37%; same rate at both doses). Preliminary response data are available at the time of abstract preparation for 13 additional patients, revealing 4 with CR (one of which had 1% residual peripheral blast) and 3 with CR-I for a response rate of 53% in this subset. MGCD0103 pharmacokinetics were not affected by 5-azacitidine. Likewise, co-administration of MGCD0103 had no impact on the pharmacokinetics of 5-azacitidine. A majority of patients exhibited a substantial reduction in PBMC HDAC activity during treatment with the combination. Analysis of DNA methylation is ongoing. In conclusion, the combination of 5-azacitidine with MGCD0103 is safe in patients with advanced AML/MDS and has clinical activity potentially superior to that expected with 5-azacitidine alone in this patient population. These results form the bases of a planned randomized study of 5-azacitidine with or without MGCD0103 in AML and MDS.

Remarkable Activity of Bortezomib Combined with Chemotherapy in a Phase I Study of Relapsed Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). A Report from the Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia (TACL) Consortium.

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1919-1919 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoav H. Messinger ◽  
Paul S. Gaynon ◽  
Elizabeth Raetz ◽  
Raymond Hutchinson ◽  
Steven DuBois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Childhood Leukemia ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Chemotherapy Drugs ◽  
Highly Active ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Drug Induction

Abstract The outcome of relapsed ALL remains very poor, and many re-induction regimens are highly toxic. We report here the Phase I component of a Phase I/II study of bortezomib added to 4-drug induction with vincristine, dexamethasone, pegylated asparaginase, and doxorubicin in children with relapsed ALL. A total of 10 patients were enrolled, 5 in 1st marrow relapse (2 early and 3 late relapses) and 5 in 2nd or subsequent relapse. Four patients were enrolled at dose level 1 (1 mg/m2) to obtain 3 evaluable patients. One patient was inevaluable for toxicity because of an error in dexamethasone doses and was removed after 8 days. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. Six patients were enrolled at dose level 2 (1.3 mg/m2), the standard single agent dose. One patient had a DLT (hypophosphatemia and rhabdomyolysis) after1 dose of bortezomib, and that patient died from diffuse zygomyces infection by day 17. Five additional patients were enrolled with no further DLT’s. As planned, no further dose escalation was pursued. The regimen had predictable toxicity related to the chemotherapy drugs. Only 2 patients had mild peripheral neuropathy (grades 1 and 2). Seven of the10 patients (70%) achieved a CR, and 1/10 had bone marrow CR with persistent central nervous system (CNS) leukemia despite weekly intrathecal (IT) methotrexate, for a total of 80% bone marrow CR rate. In conclusion: the combination of bortezomib with 4 standard drugs is highly active with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated relapsed pediatric ALL patients. We are expanding the MTD cohort for a phase II estimate, and intend to report updated results at the ASH meeting. Day 1 2 4 8 11 14 15 18 22 29 - 35 Bortezomib (1 or 1.3 mg/m2) B B B B Evaluate Vincristine (1.5 mg/m2) V V V V Doxorubicin (60 mg/m2) Dox Dexamethasone (10 mg/m2) x 14 days —— —— —— —— —— —> PEG-Asparaginase (2500 U/ m2) PEG PEG PEG PEG IT Ara-C ITA CNS Negative: IT Methotrexate ITM CNS Positive: IT Triples ITT ITT ITT

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document