Modafinil for fatigue associated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 211-211
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Hovey ◽  
Paul L. De Souza ◽  
Gavin M. Marx ◽  
Phillip Parente ◽  
Tal Rapke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Md Anderson

211 Background: Chemotherapy-induced fatigue is a common complaint for patients with cancer. We investigated whether modafinil, a psychostimulant, could reduce fatigue in patients on chemotherapy. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was conducted in patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancer suffering significant chemotherapy-related fatigue whilst undergoing docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled at the start of their 3rdor subsequent cycles of docetaxel which was continued for up to four further cycles (defined here as ‘treatment periods’). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive modafinil 200mg daily or placebo for 15 days during each treatment period. Fatigue was evaluated by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). The primary endpoint was MDASI area under the curve (AUC) during the first 7 days of study medication for the first two treatment periods (possible range 0-70). Other validated tools were used to record disturbances in sleep, mood and functional status. Results: Eighty-three patients (65 with prostate cancer) were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. The number of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 16/55 (29.1%) in the modafinil group and 5/28 (17.9%) in the placebo group. The toxicity profile was largely consistent with docetaxel-based chemotherapy and with previously reported AEs associated with modafinil use in the community; 11 AEs were possibly related to docetaxel; 1 to modafinil and 9 to neither treatment. Conclusions: Managing chemotherapy-related fatigue remains a major challenge. Despite not reaching the primary endpoint, there was a consistent trend towards improvement of chemotherapy-related fatigue in the modafinil arm. Further studies are needed to better understand the clinical implications of these findings. Funding sanofi-aventis; Study ID NCT00917748 . [Table: see text]

Modafinil for fatigue associated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy: A randomized controlled trial.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15152-e15152
Author(s):  
Elizabeth J. Hovey ◽  
Paul L. De Souza ◽  
Gavin M. Marx ◽  
Tal Rapke ◽  
Phillip Parente ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Study Medication ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Chemotherapy Patients ◽  
Castrate Resistant ◽  
High Level

e15152 Background: Docetaxel is the standard of care for castrate-resistant prostate cancer, but is associated with a high level of fatigue, limiting dosage and leading to premature withdrawal from therapy. Methods: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in patients with metastatic prostate or breast cancer suffering significant chemotherapy-related fatigue whilst undergoing docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Patients were enrolled at the start of their 3rdor subsequent cycles of docetaxel which was continued for up to four further cycles (defined here as ‘treatment periods’). Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive modafinil 200mg daily or placebo for 15 days during each treatment period. Fatigue was evaluated by the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). The primary endpoint was MDASI area under the curve (AUC) during the first 7 days of study medication for the first two treatment periods (possible range 0-70). Other validated tools were used to record disturbances in sleep, mood and functional status. Results: Eighty-three patients (65 with prostate cancer) were randomized and received at least one dose of study medication. The number of grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) was 16/55 (29.1%) in the modafinil group and 5/28 (17.9%) in the placebo group. The toxicity profile was largely consistent with docetaxel-based chemotherapy and with previously reported AEs associated with modafinil use in the community; 11 AEs were possibly related to docetaxel; 1 to modafinil and 9 to neither treatment. Conclusions: Assessing and managing chemotherapy-related fatigue remains a major challenge. Despite not reaching the primary endpoint, there was a consistent trend towards improvement of chemotherapy-related fatigue in the modafinil arm. Further studies are needed to better address the significant symptom of docetaxel-related fatigue. Funding sanofi-aventis; Study ID NCT00917748. [Table: see text]

Olanzapine for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC): Alliance A221301, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (29_suppl) ◽  
pp. 176-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolph M. Navari ◽  
Rui Qin ◽  
Kathryn Jean Ruddy ◽  
Heshan Liu ◽  
Steven Francis Powell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Secondary Endpoint ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

176 Background: The purpose of the study was to determine the effectiveness of olanzapine (OLN) for the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC). Methods: A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial was performed in chemotherapy-naïve patients receiving cisplatin, > 70 mg/m2, or cyclophosphamide-anthracycline-based chemotherapy, comparing OLN to placebo in combination with aprepitant (APR), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3), and dexamethasone (DEX). The OLN regimen was 10 mg of oral OLN, 125 mg APR, a 5-HT3, and oral DEX 12 mg pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and 10 mg/day of oral OLN and 8 mg DEX on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy plus 80 mg APR on days 2, 3 post-chemotherapy. The placebo (PLA) regimen was oral placebo, pre-chemotherapy, day 1, and on days 2-4 post-chemotherapy; the APR, 5-HT3, and DEX pre- and post-chemotherapy were identical to that used in the OLN regimen. Fosaprepitant (150 mg IV), day 1 was allowed for substitution for the oral aprepitant. Palonosetron, ondansetron, or granisetron were the permitted 5-HT3 options. Nausea was measured on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, with 0 being “no nausea at all” and 10 being “nausea as bad as it can be”. No nausea was the primary endpoint and, complete response (no emesis and no use of rescue medications) was a secondary endpoint. Results: 401 patients (202 OLN, 199 PLA) were enrolled in the study. The proportion of patients who had no nausea was significantly greater for the OLN regimen compared to the PLA regimen for the acute period (24h post-chemotherapy) (74% vs. 45%, p < 0.0006), for the delayed period ( 24-120 h post-chemotherapy) (43% vs. 26%, p < 0.0006), and for the overall period (0-120 h) (39% vs. 22%, p < 0.0006). Complete response was significantly improved for the OLN patients compared to PLA patients for the acute (85% vs. 65%, p < 0.0001), the delayed (67% vs. 53%, p < 0.0078), and the overall periods (64% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). There were no grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Conclusions: No nausea, the primary endpoint, and complete response, a secondary endpoint, were significantly improved with OLN, compared to PLA. Clinical trial information: NCT02116530.

Randomized controlled trial of Sativex to treat detrusor overactivity in multiple sclerosis

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 1349-1359 ◽  
Author(s):  
RBC Kavia ◽  
D De Ridder ◽  
CS Constantinescu ◽  
CG Stott ◽  
CJ Fowler
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Overactive Bladder ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Bladder Dysfunction ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Global Impression Of Change

Background: Bladder dysfunction is a common feature of multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: In this study we aimed to assess the efficacy, tolerability and safety of Sativex® (nabiximols) as an add-on therapy in alleviating bladder symptoms in patients with MS. Methods: We undertook a 10-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial in 135 randomized subjects with MS and overactive bladder (OAB). Results: The primary endpoint was the reduction in daily number of urinary incontinence episodes from baseline to end of treatment (8 weeks). Other endpoints included incidence of nocturia and urgency, overall bladder condition (OBC), daytime frequency, Incontinence Quality of Life (I-QOL), Patient’s Global Impression of Change (PGIC) and volume voided. The primary endpoint showed little difference between Sativex and placebo. Four out of seven secondary endpoints were significantly in favour of Sativex: number of episodes of nocturia (adjusted mean difference -0.28, p = 0.010), OBC (-1.16, p = 0.001), number of voids/day (-0.85, p = 0.001) and PGIC ( p = 0.005). Of the other endpoints, number of daytime voids was statistically significantly in favour of Sativex (-0.57, p = 0.044). The improvement in I-QOL was in favour of Sativex but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Although the primary endpoint did not reach statistical significance, we conclude that Sativex did have some impact on the symptoms of overactive bladder in patients with MS, providing evidence of some improvement in symptoms associated with bladder dysfunction in these subjects.

scholarly journals Evaluation on immediate analgesic efficacy and safety of Kai-Hou-Jian spray (children’s type) in treating sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Trials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan-ning Ma ◽  
Cheng-liang Zhong ◽  
Si-yuan Hu ◽  
Qiu-han Cai ◽  
Sheng-xuan Guo
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Sore Throat ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Effective Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Acute Pharyngitis ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Parallel Group

Abstract Background Acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis are common respiratory diseases for which children seek medical care. Their main clinical manifestation is sore throat which interferes with patients’ quality of life. However, there is no proven effective or safe method to treat it. It is necessary to find an excellent strategy to reduce sore throat and reduce the burden of acute illness. We designed the randomized controlled trial with the characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to determine the clinical positioning of Kai-Hou-Jian spray (children’s type) (KHJS) through evidence-based research. This trial aims to evaluate the immediate analgesic efficacy of KHJS on sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis (wind-heat syndrome/heat exuberance in lung and stomach syndrome) in children and to observe its safety. Methods/design This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial. It will include 240 children with acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis from 7 study sites across China. All participants are randomly assigned to two parallel treatment groups, one with KHJS and the other with placebo sprays, for 5 consecutive days. The primary outcome is the time of analgesic onset. Secondary outcomes include duration of analgesic effect, area under time curve of 0–3 h Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale (WBS) score (AUC0-3 h), rate of analgesic onset, rate of disappearance of sore throat, changes of WBS score (in days), effective rate of pharyngeal signs, and effective rate of TCM syndrome. The incidence of adverse events during the trial is the primary safety outcome. In addition, vital signs and laboratory tests before and after medication are monitored. Discussion To our knowledge, this will be the first clinical trial to explore the immediate analgesic efficacy of a Chinese patent medicine spray for acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis induced sore throat in children in a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel-group, placebo-controlled manner. Not only might it prove the efficacy and safety of KHJS in the treatment of sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis/tonsillitis in children, but it might also provide evidence for the treatment of acute sore throat with Chinese herbal medicine. Trial registration A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, very low-dose, parallel controlled trial for the immediate analgesic effect and safety of Kai-Hou- Jian spray (children's type) in the treatment of sore throat caused by acute pharyngitis and tonsillitis in children. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000031599. Registered on 5 April 2020

Final results from ClarIDHy, a global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind study of ivosidenib (IVO) versus placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with previously treated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) and an isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4069-4069
Author(s):  
Ghassan K. Abou-Alfa ◽  
Teresa Macarulla ◽  
Milind M. Javle ◽  
Robin Kate Kelley ◽  
Sam Joseph Lubner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Failure Time ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Idh1 Mutation ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Double Blind Study ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3

4069 Background: CCA is a rare cancer for which there are limited effective therapies. IDH1 mutations occur in ̃20% of intrahepatic CCAs, resulting in production of the oncometabolite D-2-hydroxyglutarate, which promotes oncogenesis. IVO (AG-120) is a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1 (mIDH1). ClarIDHy aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of IVO vs PBO in pts with unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA. The primary endpoint was met with significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology center (IRC) with IVO vs PBO (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.37, p < 0.0001). Objective response rate (ORR) and stable disease for IVO were 2.4% (3 partial responses) and 50.8% (n = 63) vs 0% and 27.9% (n = 17) for PBO. IVO pts experienced significantly less decline in physical and emotional functioning domains of quality of life at cycle 2 day 1 vs PBO pts (nominal p < 0.05). Methods: Pts with m IDH1 CCA were randomized 2:1 to IVO (500 mg PO QD) or matched PBO and stratified by prior systemic therapies (1 or 2). Key eligibility: unresectable or metastatic m IDH1 CCA based on central testing; ECOG PS 0–1; measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Crossover from PBO to IVO was permitted at radiographic progression. Primary endpoint: PFS by IRC. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS; by intent-to-treat), ORR, PFS (by investigator), safety, and quality of life. The planned crossover-adjusted OS was derived using the rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) model. Results: As of 31 May 2020, ̃780 pts were prescreened for an IDH1 mutation and 187 were randomized to IVO (n = 126) or PBO (n = 61); 13 remain on IVO. Median age 62 y; M/F 68/119; 91% intrahepatic CCA; 93% metastatic disease; 47% had 2 prior therapies. 70% of PBO pts crossed over to IVO. OS data were mature, with 79% OS events in IVO arm and 82% in PBO. Median OS (mOS) was 10.3 months for IVO and 7.5 months for PBO (HR = 0.79; 95% CI 0.56–1.12; one-sided p = 0.093). The RPSFT-adjusted mOS was 5.1 months for PBO (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.34–0.70; p < 0.0001). Common all-grade treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs, ≥ 15%) in the IVO arm: nausea 41%, diarrhea 35%, fatigue 31%, cough 25%, abdominal pain 24%, decreased appetite 24%, ascites 23%, vomiting 23%, anemia 18%, and constipation 15%. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported in 50% of IVO pts vs 37% of PBO pts, with grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs in 7% of IVO pts vs 0% in PBO. 7% of IVO pts experienced an AE leading to treatment discontinuation vs 9% of PBO pts. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: IVO was well tolerated and resulted in a favorable OS trend vs PBO despite a high rate of crossover. These data – coupled with statistical improvement in PFS, supportive quality of life data, and favorable safety profile – demonstrate the clinical benefit of IVO in advanced m IDH1 CCA. Clinical trial information: NCT02989857.

scholarly journals Effect of liraglutide on body weight and pain in patients with overweight and knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e024065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Gudbergsen ◽  
Marius Henriksen ◽  
Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens ◽  
Anders Overgaard ◽  
Henning Bliddal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Loss ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Knee Oa ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Pain Subscale

IntroductionWith an increasing prevalence of citizens of older age and with overweight, the health issues related to knee osteoarthritis (OA) will intensify. Weight loss is considered a primary management strategy in patients with concomitant overweight and knee OA. However, there are no widely available and feasible methods to sustain weight loss in patients with overweight and knee OA. The present protocol describes a randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide in a 3 mg/day dosing in patients with overweight and knee OA.Methods and analysis150 volunteer adult patients with overweight or obesity and knee OA will participate in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and single-centre trial. The participants will partake in a run-in diet intervention phase (week −8 to 0) including a low calorie diet and dietetic counselling. At week 0, patients will be randomised to either liraglutide 3 mg/day or liraglutide placebo 3 mg/day for 52 weeks as an add-on to dietetic guidance on re-introducing regular foods and a focus on continued motivation to engage in a healthy lifestyle. The co-primary outcomes are changes in body weight and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale from week 0 to week 52.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has been approved by the regional ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. An external monitoring committee (The Good Clinical Practice Unit at Copenhagen University Hospitals) will oversee the trial. The results will be presented at international scientific meetings and through publications in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbers2015-005163-16,NCT02905864, U1111-1171-4970Based on protocol versionV.6; 30 January 2017, 15:30 hours

Efficacy and safety of HX 110-A and HX 110-B in promoting respiratory health: An 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jung-Kyu Lee ◽  
Bumjo Oh ◽  
Seo-Young Yoon ◽  
Tae Yun Park ◽  
Eun Young Heo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Function ◽  
Respiratory Disease ◽  
Respiratory Symptoms ◽  
Respiratory Health ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Parallel Group ◽  
Anti Inflammatory ◽  
Experimental Group

Abstract Background HX110-A and HX110-B are compound extracts based on radix adenophorae and rhizoma dioscoreae, respectively, which have anti-inflammatory activity. There are limited data on whether they may help improve respiratory conditions including lung function. Therefore, in this trial, we will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the use of HX110-A and HX110-B for the treatment of respiratory health in adults with mild respiratory symptoms. Methods/design This will be an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial with three arms. Adults more than 40 years old with persistent respiratory symptoms will be enrolled. Patients with definite respiratory disease or with a history of recent intake of antioxidants or anti-inflammatory agents will be excluded. Study subjects will be assigned at a 1:1:1 ratio into the following three arms: controls, experimental group 1 (HX110-A), and experimental group 2 (HX110-B). Control or experimental foods will be administered for 8 weeks, and follow-up will be up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome will be total antioxidant capacity. Secondary outcomes will be inflammatory indexes, respiratory symptoms, lung function, quality of life, and fatigue level. Safety outcomes will be assessed by monitoring adverse events and vital signs, and through clinical pathology tests. Conclusion We hope that this trial will reveal the effectiveness and safety of HX110-A and/or HX110-B for medical purposes in adults with respiratory symptoms. The results should clarify if active intake of specific foods with these functional compounds may promote respiratory health in adults without definite respiratory disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document