Impact of use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-I) after radical prostatectomy (RP) on biochemical recurrence-free (BCRF) and overall survival (OS): A retrospective study from the Northwestern University SPORE in prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 27-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arden B. Roston ◽  
Irene B. Helenowski ◽  
William Catalona ◽  
Robin Leikin ◽  
Michael Gurley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors

27 Background: The correlation between PDE5-I use to improve erectile function post RP and BCRF and OS on prostate cancer (PCa) patients (pts) has yielded conflicting results among prior retrospective cohort studies (Michl, 2015). Recent data suggests that these drugs may have an impact on immunity that may explain possible benefits. This study’s purpose was to determine whether PDE5-I use affects BCRF and OS for pts treated with RP for PCa. Methods: This is an IRB approved retrospective cohort study analyzing a subset of pts consented to the SPORE in PCa at Northwestern University’s Lurie Cancer Center. Inclusion criteria included men diagnosed with PCa and treated with RP with curative intent between 2003-2015. Study population (n = 2,410) showed 834 (34.6%) received a PDE5-I post-RP, while 1,576 (65.4%) did not. Pts were grouped based on PDE5-I use and no PDE5-I use after RP. A PDE5-I user must have filled at least 2 prescriptions or completed at least 2 inpatient administrations of a PDE5-I. Continuous variables were summarized by descriptive statistics and differences between groups were assessed via the Wilcoxon rank sum test. Categorical variables were reported by frequencies and percentages and compared via Fisher’s exact test. OS and BCRF survival were summarized for 10-yr rates using Kaplan-Meier estimates. The difference in BCRF and OS between groups was evaluated via log-rank test. Results: Mean age at RP was 60, and 90.95 % were Caucasian. Except for pairwise comparisons for significance of Gleason 3+3 vs. 3+4 histology with higher prevalence of 3+4 in the PDE5-I group (p = 0.0004) and a higher percent of clinical stage T2b-c than T2a in the no PDE5-I group (p = 0.01), no differences were noted in demographics. The 10-yr BCRF survival among PDE5-I users was 92.53% compared to 79.63% among non-users after RP (p < 0.0001). The 10-yr OS rate among PDE5-I users was 97.22% compared to 92.69% among non-users (p = 0.008). Conclusions: This retrospective analysis suggests that PDE5-I use improves biochemical recurrence free survival and overall survival in pts treated with RP for PCa.

scholarly journals 236 Predictors of ICI renal toxicity: a pathological approach

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A252-A252
Author(s):  
Ala Abudayyeh ◽  
Liye Suo ◽  
Heather Lin ◽  
Omar Mamlouk ◽  
Cassian Yee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Renal Toxicity ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Interstitial Fibrosis ◽  
Transplant Rejection ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Md Anderson

BackgroundInflammatory response in unintended tissues and organs associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors also known as immune related adverse events (irAEs) is a management challenge, and renal irAEs are associated with increased patient morbidity and mortality. The most common renal toxicity is acute interstitial nephritis (AIN), characterized by infiltration of renal tissue with immune cells, and may be analogous to kidney transplant rejection. Using both clinical variables and tissue findings we evaluated a large cohort of ICI cases to determine predictors of renal response and overall survival.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all patients treated with ICI (August 2007 to August 2020) at MD Anderson Cancer Center. A total of 38 patients with biopsy confirmed AIN and available tissue were identified. All slides were reviewed by two board certified renal pathologists and the severity of inflammation and chronicity was graded using transplant rejection BANFF criteria. Patients were categorized as renal responders if creatinine improved or returned to baseline after treatment and non-responders if it did not. Fisher’s exact tests for categorical variables and t-test/ANOVA or the counterparts of the non-parametric approaches (Wilcoxon rank-sum or Kruskal-Wallis) for continuous variables were used to compare patient‘s characteristics between groups. The distribution of overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was performed to test the difference in survival between groups.ResultsBased on the detailed pathological findings, patients with increased interstitial fibrosis were less likely to have renal response with treatment compared to patients with less fibrosis, (p < 0.05). Inflammation, tubulitis, number of eosinophils and neutrophils had no impact on renal response. Patients with response within 3 months of AKI treatment had a superior OS in comparison to patients who responded late (12-month OS rate: 77% vs 27%, p < 0.05). Notably, patients who received concurrent ICI and achieved renal response within 3 months had the best OS while those who did not receive concurrent ICI nor achieved renal response had worst OS (12-month OS rate: 100% (renal response and concurrent ICI) vs 72% ( renal response with no concurrent ICI), vs 27% ( no renal response and nonconcurrent ICI) (p < 0.05).ConclusionsThis is the first analysis of ICI induced nephritis where a detailed pathological and clinical evaluation was performed to predict renal response. Our findings highlight the importance of early diagnosis and treatment of ICI-AIN while continuing concurrent ICI therapy.Ethics ApprovalThis retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, and the procedures followed were in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

scholarly journals Digital Rectal Examination Remains a Key Prognostic Tool for Prostate Cancer: A National Cancer Database Review

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 829-837
Author(s):  
Jenna F. Borkenhagen ◽  
Daniel Eastwood ◽  
Deepak Kilari ◽  
William A. See ◽  
Jonathan D. Van Wickle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Value ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Digital Rectal Examination ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
National Cancer Database ◽  
Prognostic Tool ◽  
Rectal Examination

AbstractBackground: Prostate cancer clinical stage T2 (cT2) subclassifications, as determined by digital rectal examination (DRE), are a historic method of staging prostate cancer. However, given the potential discomfort associated with prostate examination and the wide availability of other prognostic tests, the necessity of DRE is uncertain. This study sought to determine the prognostic value of the prostate cancer cT2 subclassifications in a contemporary cohort of patients. Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to identify a cohort of men with high-risk clinical T2N0M0 prostate cancer treated with external-beam radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapies ± surgery from 2004 to 2010. We assessed overall survival from a landmark time of 10 months using Kaplan-Meier and log-rank test analysis. A multivariate proportional hazards model was used to estimate the simultaneous effects of multiple factors, including cT2 subclassification and other well-established prognostic indicators of overall survival in prostate cancer. Results: A total of 5,291 men were included in the final analysis, with a median follow-up of 5.4 years. The cT2a, cT2b, and cT2c subclassifications demonstrated increasing hazard ratios of 1.00 (reference), 1.25 (95% CI, 1.07–1.45; P=.0046), and 1.43 (95% CI, 1.25–1.63; P<.0001), respectively, reflecting a higher probability of death with each incremental increase in cT2 subclassification. This finding was independent of other known prognostic variables on multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Results show that cT2 subclassifications had independent prognostic value in a large and contemporary cohort of men. cT2 classification remains an important, low-cost prognostic tool for men with prostatic adenocarcinoma. The clinical relevance of this test should be appreciated and accounted for by providers treating prostate adenocarcinoma.

scholarly journals Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival of Patients with Prostate Cancer in Kyadondo County, Uganda

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Joseph Yahaya ◽  
Tonny Okecha ◽  
Michael Odida ◽  
Henry Wabinga
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Overall Survival Rate

Background. Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer among men globally. A few studies that have been done in Uganda on survival of patients with prostate cancer indicate that, the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer in Uganda is poor. The aim of this study was to determine the 3-year overall survival rate of a cohort of patients with prostate cancer residing in Kyadondo County who were diagnosed from 2012 to 2014. The secondary objective was to correlate the overall survival with the clinicopathological prognostic factors. Materials and Methods. This was a retrospective cohort study which involved 136 patients who were diagnosed histologically with prostate cancer at the department of pathology between 2012 and 2014. The cases were registered at the Kampala cancer registry and followed up to 31st December 2017. Data analysis was done using STATA version 12.0. The Kaplan-Meir curves were used for analysis of the 3-year overall survival rate. Hazard ratio (HR) and Log-rank test at 95% confidence interval under Cox-regression model were used to evaluate the effect of the covariates on the 3-year overall survival rate. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results. More than half of the cases, 55.9% (n=76) had Gleason score >8. Most of the patients, 67.7% (n=92) had advanced disease at diagnosis. The 3-year overall survival rate was 67.6% with median survival of 36.5 months and range of 0–65 months. Clinical stage of the patients (HR = 1.65, p=0.039), Gleason score (HR = 1.88, p=0.008), and lymphovascular invasion (HR = 0.37, p=0.002) were the independent predictors of the 3-year overall survival rate in this study. Conclusion. The 3-year overall survival of prostate cancer patients in Uganda is poor. Most of the patients with are diagnosed with advanced clinical stages (stage III and IV). The Gleason score, clinical stage and lymphovascular invasion can powerfully predict independently the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer. This implies that the Gleason score, clinical stage and lymphovascular invasion may be used to predict the overall survival of patients with prostate cancer even prior prostatectomy.

Bortezomib-Containing Regimens (BCR) for the Treatment of Non-Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1846-1846
Author(s):  
Victor H Jimenez-Zepeda ◽  
Peter Duggan ◽  
Paola Neri ◽  
Nizar J Bahlis
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Fisher Exact Test ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction In patients not eligible for transplant due to age and/or co-morbidities, the selection of up-front therapy needs to balance efficacy and toxicity. Recently, regimens with bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor proven to be efficacious in myeloma, have been reported. Based on these findings, we aimed to evaluate the impact of different bortezomib combinations for the treatment of non transplant-eligible MM. Methods All- consecutive patients treated with bortezomib-containing regimens (BCR) at Tom Baker Cancer Center (TBCC) from 01/2006 to June/2015 were evaluated. Definitions of response and progression were used according to the EBMT modified criteria and a category of very good partial response (VGPR) was added. Two-sided Fisher exact test was used to test for differences between categorical variables. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Survival curves were constructed according to the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log rank test. Results 113 consecutive patients with MM received BCR. Thirty-three patients were treated with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CyBorD), 41 with bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone (VMP) and 39 with bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD). Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1. At the time of analysis, 20, 17 and 18 patients in the CyBorD, VMP and VD groups are still alive and 14, 33 and 30 have already progressed, respectively. ORR and VGPR rates were 93.9%/75.7%, 80%/53% and 76%/48% (p=0.001) for patients treated with CyBorD, VMP and VD, respectively. Median OS was NR for CyBorD, compared to 41months and 37 months for VMP and VD patients (p=0.6). Median PFS was 16.7 months for CyBorD compared to 17.5 months and 11 months for VMP and VD (P=0.6), respectively. The rate of treatment discontinuation and median number of cycles were: 9%, 26% and 12.8% and 6, 7.5 and 4 cycles for CyBorD, VMP and VD patients, respectively. Patients were to receive 6-9 cycles of treatment and the regimen could be continued to a maximum of 2 years at the discretion of the treating hematologist based on tolerability and response. Nine patients (27%) in the CyBorD group and 17 (41.4%) and 4 (10%) in the VMP and VD group received maintenance treatment. Median OS and PFS was longer for the group receiving maintenance (62 months vs 32 months and 23 months vs 10 months, p=0.007). In conclusion, bortezomib containing regimens are efficacious in the treatment of non-transplant eligible MM. Patients receiving maintenance appeared to exhibit longer PFS and OS. Very elderly patients should be subjected to frailty and comorbidity indexes aiming to decrease toxicity and prolong survival. Table 1. Clinical Characteristics Characteristic CyBorD, n=33 VMP, n=41 VD, n=39 Age (median) 58 58 58 GenderMaleFemale 20 (60.6%)13 (39.4%) 22 (53.6%)19 (46.4%) 26 (66.6%)13 (33.4%) Hb (g/L) 107 110 103 Calcium (µmol/L) 2.4 2.35 2.31 Creatinine (µmol/L) 115.5 103 108 B2microglobulin (µmol/L) 4.1 3.42 5.9 Albumin (g/L) 31 31 30 Stage IStage IIStage III 6 (12.1%)14 (42.4%)13 (45.5%) 9 (21.9%)19 (46.3%)13 (31.8%) 4 (10.2%)16 (41%)18 (48.8%) LDH (IU/L) 185 179 174 BMPC (%) 31 30 33.5 Heavy chain:IgGIgAFLC onlyIgDIgMBiclonal 2247000 19148000 21107010 Light chain:KappaLambdaBiclonal 16170 29120 24150 High riskStandard risk 5 (15%) 28 6 (14.6%)35 8 (20%)31 Ab: BMPC: Bone marrow plasma cells. Figure 1. Overall survival for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD Figure 1. Overall survival for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD Figure 2. Progression-Free survival for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD Figure 2. Progression-Free survival for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD Figure 3. OS for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD maintenance Figure 3. OS for patients receiving CyBorD, VMP and VD maintenance Disclosures Jimenez-Zepeda: Celgene: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; J&J: Honoraria. Duggan:Jansen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Neri:Celgene: Research Funding. Bahlis:Johnson & Johnson: Speakers Bureau; Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Johnson & Johnson: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio as a prognostic marker in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 442-442
Author(s):  
Mohamed Mady ◽  
Kritika Prasai ◽  
Siddhartha Yadav ◽  
Mohamed Abdelrahim Muddathir Hassan ◽  
Lewis R. Roberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Platelet Count ◽  
Gallbladder Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Marker ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Neutrophil To Lymphocyte Ratio ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Lymphocyte Ratio

442 Background: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been used as an inflammation-based prognostic marker for various malignancies. The aim of our study was to determine whether NLR can independently predict the overall survival in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer (GBC). Methods: We identified patients diagnosed with GBC who were treated at Mayo Clinic between the years 2000 and 2016. Patients who had nonmetastatic GBC were excluded along with the patients who did not have data for neutrophils and lymphocytes. Optimal cutoff point for NLR was identified by plotting martingale residuals against NLR and patients were divided into two groups, ≥ 5 or < 5. Demographic, follow-up data and outcomes were collected by retrospective review of electronic medical records. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare categorical variables, while The Mann- Whitney U test was used to compare continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were plotted for NLR ≥ 5 and NLR < 5 and overall survival (OS) between the two groups were compared using log rank test. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using Cox-proportional hazard regression. Results: A total of 231 patients met our inclusion criteria, of which, 138 (60%) had NLR < 5 and 93 (40%) had NLR ≥ 5. Patients with NLR ≥ 5 were more likely to be older and have poor performance score, lower albumin level, higher alkaline phosphatase level, and higher platelet count. There were no significant differences noted in gender, race and administration of chemotherapy between the two groups. In univariate analysis, patients with NLR ≥ 5 at presentation had a significantly worse OS compared to those with NLR < 5 (Median survival: 3.6 vs. 8.8 months, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, ECOG status, albumin, ALP, AST, ALT, bilirubin, platelet count and administration of chemotherapy, NLR of ≥ 5 was associated with a worse OS compared to NLR < 5 (HR: 1.70, 95% CI:1.20 – 2.39. p < 0.05). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that NLR ≥ 5 is an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with metastatic gallbladder cancer.

scholarly journals Epilepsy as a Comorbidity in Polymyositis and Dermatomyositis—A Cross-Sectional Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (8) ◽  
pp. 3983
Author(s):  
Ella Nissan ◽  
Abdulla Watad ◽  
Arnon D. Cohen ◽  
Kassem Sharif ◽  
Johnatan Nissan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multivariable Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Cross Sectional

Polymyositis (PM) and dermatomyositis (DM) are autoimmune-mediated multisystemic myopathies, characterized mainly by proximal muscle weakness. A connection between epilepsy and PM/DM has not been reported previously. Our study aim is to evaluate this association. A case–control study was conducted, enrolling a total of 12,278 patients with 2085 cases (17.0%) and 10,193 subjects in the control group (83.0%). Student’s t-test was used to evaluate continuous variables, while the chi-square test was applied for the distribution of categorical variables. Log-rank test, Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariate Cox proportional hazards method were performed for the analysis regarding survival. Of the studied 2085 cases, 1475 subjects (70.7%) were diagnosed with DM, and 610 patients (29.3%) with PM. Participants enrolled as cases had a significantly higher rate of epilepsy (n = 48 [2.3%]) as compared to controls (n = 141 [1.4%], p < 0.0005). Using multivariable logistic regression analysis, PM was found only to be significantly associated with epilepsy (OR 2.2 [95%CI 1.36 to 3.55], p = 0.0014), whereas a non-significant positive trend was noted in DM (OR 1.51 [95%CI 0.99 to 2.30], p = 0.0547). Our data suggest that PM is associated with a higher rate of epilepsy compared to controls. Physicians should be aware of this comorbidity in patients with immune-mediated myopathies.

Retrospective cohort analysis of real-world clinical outcomes in nonmetastatic (M0) castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) treated with novel androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 51-51
Author(s):  
Richard Gagnon ◽  
Nimira S. Alimohamed ◽  
Alexander Watson ◽  
Eugene Batuyong ◽  
Alyssa Chow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Real World ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Cohort Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Free Survival

51 Background: The landscape of M0 CRPC has changed with the recent demonstration of metastasis-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) improvements with the use of ARPIs in clinical trial settings. However, the extrapolation of this data to clinical practice is limited by strict exclusion criteria in these trials, including prior or concurrent malignancy, cardiovascular disease, or hypertension. The purpose of this study was to assess real-world outcomes in patients with M0 CRPC treated with ARPIs compared to historical controls. Methods: We designed a retrospective cohort study with the inclusion of patients in Alberta, Canada diagnosed with M0 CRPC between 2001-2020. Via chart review, we identified baseline characteristics, potential confounders, treatment details, and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of interest was MFS. Secondary outcomes included: second progression-free survival (PFS2) and OS. Median survival times were measured using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test was used for comparison of outcomes based on ARPI exposure. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) accounting for impact of PSA doubling time (PSADT), use of osteoclast inhibiting agents, and presence of pelvic lymphadenopathy. Results: We identified 211 patients across multiple centres in Alberta with M0 CRPC, with 54 having received apalutamide (40/54), enzalutamide (7/54), or darolutamide (7/54). Median age at M0 CRPC diagnosis was 74 years; median PSADT was 4.4 months; and 19% of patients (40/211) had pelvic lymphadenopathy at diagnosis. Median MFS in patients treated with ARPIs was 47.5 months compared to 20.6 months in those not treated with ARPIs (HR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.49; p < 0.001). Median PFS2 in ARPI treated patients was 66.3 months compared with 35.6 months (HR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.18-0.87; p = 0.022). Median OS for patients treated with ARPI was not reached. Conclusions: Given the older age of men with advanced prostate cancer, real-world outcomes that include patients with comorbidities are important adjuncts to the interpretation of clinical trials exploring the benefit of novel therapeutics. Here, we demonstrate that in a real-world, unselected population of men with M0 CRPC, apalutamide, enzalutamide, and darolutamide seem to confer similar MFS and PFS2 benefits to those demonstrated in the SPARTAN, PROSPER, and ARAMIS studies. Real-world OS data remain immature and will be an important addition to these findings.

Treatment changes in prostate cancer patients on active treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community cancer center in New York City.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18750-e18750
Author(s):  
Rose Snyder ◽  
Trishala Meghal ◽  
Andrew Wood ◽  
Ariel Schulman ◽  
Kevin Douglas Becker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Post Surgery ◽  
Treatment Changes ◽  
Schedule Change

e18750 Background: The surge of the SARS coronavirus-2 (COVID-19) pandemic posed great challenges in the oncology community for optimal management of cancer patients. We sought to analyze the treatment changes experienced by the prostate cancer patients in March, April and May 2020 and to compare these treatment decisions to the published guidelines. Methods: We focused on patients currently receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with leuprolide acetate, and/or oral anti-androgen agents (Androgen receptor axis targeted agent, ARAT), or chemotherapy. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and the oncologists and nurse practitioners were interviewed to understand the decision-making process. Results: Seventy-five patients were included, median age 72 years old (range 47-95). All were taking ADT, and 21 were also taking ARAT, and 3 were also receiving chemotherapy. The incidence and indications for their ADT treatments and schedule changes are shown in the table below. Twenty-seven patients (36%) experienced delays in their ADT treatment, and the percentage of treatment change was similar in categories of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), metastatic castration resistant cancer (mCRPC), biochemical recurrence as well as stage IVA post surgery. Four patients were receiving neoadjuvant ADT planned prior to definitive radiation, and none had schedule change. One patient with mHSPC and 2 patients with mCRPC continued chemotherapy as planned. One patient declined recommended chemotherapy for mCRPC. Two patients were given q 3 months dose of ADT instead of q 1m, while all the rest were already receiving q3 months dosing. Among the 27 patients who had schedule change, 12 (44.4%) patients had a discussion with their providers first, and 15 patients (55.6%) did not keep their treatment appointment. Conclusions: About one third of patients changed ADT injection schedule with a similar percentage in patients with mHSPC, or mCRPC or Biochemical recurrence, or IVA after surgery. Every 3 months dosing of ADT recommended by NCCN significantly decreases exposure to COVID -19, delaying or skipping treatment was still encountered due to health concern or travel limitations. On the other hand, all patients receiving neoadjuvant ADT, or chemotherapy stayed on schedule. Although NCCN guideline recommended delaying myelosuppressive therapy, palliative chemotherapy for symptomatic, refractory patients may still be a priority.[Table: see text]

Surgery for pathological T3a, T3b and lymph node positive, prostate cancer: surgical, functional and oncological outcomes

2020 ◽  
pp. 205141582095820
Author(s):  
Niall Gilliland ◽  
Sarath Vennam ◽  
Robert Geraghty ◽  
Julian Peacock ◽  
Matthew Crockett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Subsequent Treatment ◽  
Pathological Stage ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Oncological Outcomes

Objective: To investigate and document the surgical, functional and oncological outcomes following surgery for high-risk prostate cancer patients. Patients and methods: Patients with pathological T3a, T3b and N1 disease were extracted from our prospectively updated institutional database. Data include demographics, preoperative cancer parameters, short and long-term complications and functional results. Details of biochemical recurrence, type and oncological outcome of salvage treatments, cancer-specific and overall survival were also obtained. Results: A total of 669 patients were included; 58.9% had T3a disease, 35.9% had pT3b and 11.4% N1 disease. With a median follow-up of 66 months (8–129), overall survival was 94.3%, cancer-specific survival was 98.7% and biochemical recurrence was 45.6%. Average inpatient stay was 1 day and the overall complication rate was 9.1%; 54.2% experienced a biochemical recurrence and 90.3% went on to have one or more salvage treatments, which were varied. Significant predictors of biochemical recurrence included pathological stage, any positive margin and patient age ( P<0.005). A total of 44.9% had an immediate biochemical recurrence, with 90% receiving subsequent treatment and 20.5% having a durable response. None of the patients receiving prostate bed radiotherapy alone had a durable response. 54% had a delayed biochemical recurrence, with 63.5% receiving subsequent treatment and 44% having a durable response. Conclusions: Surgery is associated with encouraging surgical and functional outcomes, cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates in these patients. Pathological stage is a significant predictor of biochemical recurrence. The present analysis shows that long-term observation for certain patients with biochemical recurrence is appropriate and questions the effectiveness of further local salvage treatments in patients with an immediate biochemical recurrence postoperatively. Level of evidence: II

scholarly journals A descriptive report of outcomes of primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving either an adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimen

2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 904-909
Author(s):  
Brooke A Schlappe ◽  
Qin C Zhou ◽  
Roisin O'Cearbhaill ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Robert A Soslow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Categorical Variables ◽  
Continuous Variables ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
Clinical Criteria ◽  
Kaplan Meier

ObjectiveWe described progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with primary mucinous ovarian cancer receiving adjuvant gynecologic versus gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens.MethodsWe identified all primary mucinous ovarian cancer patients receiving adjuvant gynecologic or gastrointestinal chemotherapy regimens at a single institution from 1994 to 2016. Gynecologic pathologists using strict pathologic/clinical criteria determined diagnosis. Adjuvant therapy was coded as gynecologic or gastrointestinal based on standard agents and schedules. Clinical/pathologic/treatment characteristics were recorded. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for continuous variables, and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Progression-free and overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, applying landmark analysis.ResultsOf 62 patients identified, 21 received adjuvant chemotherapy: 12 gynecologic, 9 gastrointestinal. Median age (in years) at diagnosis: 58 (range 25–68) gynecologic cohort, 38 (range 32–68) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.13). Median body mass index at first post-operative visit: 25 kg/m2(range 18–31) gynecologic cohort, 23 kg/m2(range 18–31) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.23). History of smoking: 6/12 (50%) gynecologic cohort, 3/9 (33%) gastrointestinal cohort (p=0.66). Stage distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: stage I: 9/12 (75%) and 3/9 (33%); stage II: 2/12 (17%) and 1/9 (11%); stage III: 1/12 (8%) and 5/9 (56%) (p=0.06). Grade distribution in gynecologic and gastrointestinal cohorts, respectively: grade 1: 8/12 (67%) and 1/9 (13%); grade 2/3: 4/12 (33%) and 7/9 (88%) (p=0.03). Three-year progression-free survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7 %) gynecologic, 53.3% (95% CI 17.7% to 79.6%) gastrointestinal. Three-year overall survival: 90.9% (95% CI 50.8% to 98.7%) gynecologic, 76.2% (95% CI 33.2% to 93.5%) gastrointestinal.ConclusionOngoing international collaborative research may further define associations between chemotherapy regimens and survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document