Dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with tumors with BRAF V600E/K mutations: Results from the molecular analysis for therapy choice (MATCH) Arm H.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3002-3002 ◽  
Author(s):  
April K.S. Salama ◽  
Shuli Li ◽  
Erin Renee Macrae ◽  
Jong-In Park ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Therapy Choice ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Mixed Histology

3002 Background: The NCI-MATCH precision medicine trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma with progression on prior treatment to a targeted therapy based on genetic alterations identified in pre-treatment biopsies. Arm H (EAY131-H) evaluated the combination of the BRAF inhibitor (inh) dabrafenib (DAB), and the MEK inh, trametinib (TRM), in pts with BRAF V600E/K mutations. Methods: Pts with melanoma, thyroid, or colorectal cancer were excluded. Pts with NSCLC were excluded after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved DAB/TRM for this indication. Pts received DAB 150 mg po BID and TRM 2 mg PO daily on 28 day cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity; restaging was performed every 2 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 35 pts were enrolled from 1/2016-2/2018; 2 were ineligible (CrCl below criteria; labs out of window). Over 17 distinct tumor histologies were represented. 58% of pts were female, median age was 63 (range 21-85), 94% were Caucasian, and 48% of pts had received at least 3 prior therapies (range 1- 8). The confirmed ORR was 33.3% (90% CI 19.9%, 49.1%), with a median duration of response (DoR) of 12 months (mon). Varied histologies had a DoR of > 12 mon: histiocytic sarcoma, cholangiocarcinoma and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma of unknown primary, among others. Median PFS was 9.4 mon; the 6 mon PFS rate was 70.6% (90% CI 58.2%-85.5%), and an additional 10 pts had a PFS > 5.5 mon. Median OS has not been reached. At the time of data cutoff (12/2018) 11 pts continue on treatment. Adverse events (AE) were comparable to previously reported profiles of DAB/TRM; no new AEs were identified. The most frequent grade 3 AEs were fatigue, neutropenia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, and urinary tract infection; there was 1 grade 4 sepsis; no grade 5 AEs. Conclusions: In this pre-treated, mixed histology cohort, DAB and TRM showed promising activity outside of currently approved FDA indications warranting further investigations. Correlative analyses are planned. Clinical trial information: NCT02465060.

scholarly journals Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients With Tumors With BRAFV600E Mutations: Results of the NCI-MATCH Trial Subprotocol H

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (33) ◽  
pp. 3895-3904 ◽  
Author(s):  
April K. S. Salama ◽  
Shuli Li ◽  
Erin R. Macrae ◽  
Jong-In Park ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Match Trial ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
End Point ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Tumor Types

PURPOSE BRAFV600 mutations are commonly found in melanoma and thyroid cancers and to a lesser degree in other tumor types. Subprotocol H (EAY131-H) of the NCI-MATCH platform trial sought to investigate the selective BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor trametinib in patients with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma whose tumors harbored a BRAFV600 mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS EAY131-H is an open-label, single-arm study. Patients with melanoma, thyroid, or colorectal cancer were excluded; patients with non–small-cell lung cancer were later excluded in an amendment. Patients received dabrafenib 150 mg twice per day and trametinib 2 mg per day continuously until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR); secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, and overall survival. RESULTS Thirty-five patients were enrolled, and 29 were included in the primary efficacy analysis as prespecified in the protocol. Median age was 59 years, and 45% of the patients had received ≥ 3 lines of therapy. The confirmed ORR was 38% (90% CI, 22.9% to 54.9%) with P < .0001 against a null rate of 5%, and PFS was 11.4 months (90% CI, 8.4 to 16.3 months); responses were seen in 7 distinct tumor types. Seven patients had a duration of response of > 12 months, including 4 patients with a duration of response of > 24 months. An additional 8 patients had a PFS > 6 months. The median overall survival was 28.6 months. Reported adverse events were comparable to those noted in previously reported profiles of dabrafenib and trametinib. CONCLUSION This study met its primary end point, with an ORR of 38% ( P < .0001) in this mixed histology, pretreated cohort. This promising activity warrants additional investigations in BRAFV600-mutated tumors outside of currently approved indications.

scholarly journals Outcomes of BRAF V600E Pediatric Gliomas Treated With Targeted BRAF Inhibition

2020 ◽  
pp. 561-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liana Nobre ◽  
Michal Zapotocky ◽  
Vijay Ramaswamy ◽  
Scott Ryall ◽  
Julie Bennett ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Homozygous Deletion ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Rapid Progression ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Braf Inhibition ◽  
Poor Outcomes

PURPOSE Children with pediatric gliomas harboring a BRAF V600E mutation have poor outcomes with current chemoradiotherapy strategies. Our aim was to study the role of targeted BRAF inhibition in these tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS We collected clinical, imaging, molecular, and outcome information from patients with BRAF V600E–mutated glioma treated with BRAF inhibition across 29 centers from multiple countries. RESULTS Sixty-seven patients were treated with BRAF inhibition (pediatric low-grade gliomas [PLGGs], n = 56; pediatric high-grade gliomas [PHGGs], n = 11) for up to 5.6 years. Objective responses were observed in 80% of PLGGs, compared with 28% observed with conventional chemotherapy ( P < .001). These responses were rapid (median, 4 months) and sustained in 86% of tumors up to 5 years while receiving therapy. After discontinuation of BRAF inhibition, 76.5% (13 of 17) of patients with PLGG experienced rapid progression (median, 2.3 months). However, upon rechallenge with BRAF inhibition, 90% achieved an objective response. Poor prognostic factors in conventional therapies, such as concomitant homozygous deletion of CDKN2A, were not associated with lack of response to BRAF inhibition. In contrast, only 36% of those with PHGG responded to BRAF inhibition, with all but one tumor progressing within 18 months. In PLGG, responses translated to 3-year progression-free survival of 49.6% (95% CI, 35.3% to 69.5%) versus 29.8% (95% CI, 20% to 44.4%) for BRAF inhibition versus chemotherapy, respectively ( P = .02). CONCLUSION Use of BRAF inhibition results in robust and durable responses in BRAF V600E–mutated PLGG. Prospective studies are required to determine long-term survival and functional outcomes with BRAF inhibitor therapy in childhood gliomas.

Phase 2 study of tremelimumab plus durvalumab for previously-treated malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8549-8549 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepti Venkatraman ◽  
Adrienne Anderson ◽  
Subba Digumarthy ◽  
Patrick H. Lizotte ◽  
Mark M. Awad
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Flow Cytometric ◽  
Phase 2 Study ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Pre Treatment

8549 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients (pts) with MPM who experience disease progression after first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. This study was designed to explore the activity of combined CTLA-4 + PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition using tremelimumab plus durvalumab in previously-treated MPM. Methods: We conducted a phase 2 study of tremelimumab 75 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg administered intravenously every 4 weeks for four cycles followed by durvalumab maintenance every 4 weeks. Eligible pts had previously received pemetrexed-based platinum doublet chemotherapy and had measurable disease using modified RECIST criteria for mesothelioma. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and duration of response (DoR) as well as safety and tolerability of this combination. A Simon two-stage design was employed to enroll up to 40 patients if 4 or more responses were observed among the first 19 study patients. Pre-treatment, on-treatment, and optional post-progression biopsies underwent flow cytometric immunoprofiling for correlative studies. Results: Among 19 pts enrolled in this study, the best objective response was a confirmed partial response in one patient (5%), stable disease in 9 pts (47%), progressive disease in 8 pts (42%), and not evaluable in one patient. At a median follow-up of 7.1 months, the median PFS was 2.8 months (95% CI 2.04-5.72), and the median OS was 7.8 months (95% CI 6.24-not reached). Of 17 PD-L1 evaluable cases, 10 (59%) were PD-L1 negative, and 7 (41%) had a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥1%. Treatment was generally well-tolerated and there were no treatment-related study discontinuations or deaths. Flow cytometric immunologic changes over the course of treatment associated with disease control will be presented. Conclusions: Tremelimumab + durvalumab was well-tolerated in unselected pts with previously-treated MPM. This study did not meet its primary endpoint. Additional strategies are necessary to develop novel immunotherapeutics and biomarkers of response in MPM. Clinical trial information: NCT03075527.

scholarly journals ACTR-30. UPDATED EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DABRAFENIB PLUS TRAMETINIB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT/REFRACTORY BRAF V600E–MUTATED HIGH-GRADE GLIOMA (HGG) AND LOW-GRADE GLIOMA (LGG)

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi19-vi20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick Wen ◽  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Martin van den Bent ◽  
Jacques De Greve ◽  
Sascha Dietrich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Grade Glioma ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Ongoing Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND There is a lack of treatment options for HGG and LGG patients. BRAFV600E mutations are uncommon in glioma, with a poor long-term prognosis. Combined BRAF/MEK inhibition extends progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in BRAF V600E–mutated melanoma, non small-cell lung cancer, and anaplastic thyroid cancer. METHODS This phase 2, open-label trial (NCT02034110) evaluated dabrafenib (BRAF inhibitor, 150mg BID) plus trametinib (MEK inhibitor, 2mg QD) in patients with BRAF V600E mutations in 9 rare tumor types, including HGG and LGG. Eligible patients had histologically-confirmed recurrent or progressive glioma (LGG:WHO grade 1 or 2; HGG:WHO grade 3 or 4), with HGG patients required to have received radiotherapy and first-line chemotherapy, or concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment continued until unacceptable toxicity, disease progression, or death. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) using RANO criteria. Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR), PFS, OS, and safety. RESULTS Interim analysis (IA) #14 (data cutoff: April 2, 2018) reported additional 3 months follow-up, with 49 patients enrolled (HGG, n=39; LGG, n=10) and 3 patients not evaluable for response. In HGG patients, ORR was 27% (10/37; 95%CI: 13.8%-44.1%), including CR (n=1), PR (n=9), and SD (n=11), with 16 patients currently ongoing treatment. In LGG patients, ORR was 56% (5/9; 95%CI: 26.8%-79.3%), including PR (n=5) and SD (n=4), with 6 patients currently ongoing treatment. OS, PFS, and DOR will be presented (IA#15). In HGG patients, adverse events (AEs) included fatigue (33%), headache (31%), rash (28%), and pyrexia (23%); grade 3/4 AEs included neutropenia (8%) and fatigue (5%). In LGG patients, AEs included headache (70%), fatigue, pyrexia (60% each), nausea, and arthralgia (50% each); grade 3/4 AEs included fatigue (20%). CONCLUSIONS Dabrafenib plus trametinib demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with recurrent or refractory BRAF V600E‒mutated HGG or LGG, with manageable AEs and no new safety signals.

Endometriumkarzinom: Kombination aus Lenvatinib und Pembrolizumab zeigt Wirksamkeit unabhängig vom Mikrosatellitenstatus

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-2
Author(s):  
Sarah Matz
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Carcinoma ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Prior Systemic Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

<b>Purpose:</b> Patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma have limited treatment options. We report final primary efficacy analysis results for a patient cohort with advanced endometrial carcinoma receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in an ongoing phase Ib/II study of selected solid tumors. <b>Methods:</b> Patients took lenvatinib 20 mg once daily orally plus pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks, in 3-week cycles. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) at 24 weeks (ORRWk24); secondary efficacy end points included duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIST. <b>Results:</b> At data cutoff, 108 patients with previously treated endometrial carcinoma were enrolled, with a median follow-up of 18.7 months. The ORRWk24 was 38.0% (95% CI, 28.8% to 47.8%). Among subgroups, the ORRWk24 (95% CI) was 63.6% (30.8% to 89.1%) in patients with microsatellite instability (MSI)-high tumors (n = 11) and 36.2% (26.5% to 46.7%) in patients with microsatellite-stable tumors (n = 94). For previously treated patients, regardless of tumor MSI status, the median DOR was 21.2 months (95% CI, 7.6 months to not estimable), median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 5.3 to 8.7 months), and median OS was 16.7 months (15.0 months to not estimable). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 83/124 (66.9%) patients. <b>Conclusion:</b> Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced endometrial carcinoma who have experienced disease progression after prior systemic therapy, regardless of tumor MSI status. The combination therapy had a manageable toxicity profile. <b>Trial registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02501096.

A phase 2 study of defactinib (VS-6063) in patients with NF2 altered tumors: Results from NCI-match (EAY131) subprotocol U.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3087-3087
Author(s):  
David Michael Jackman ◽  
Opeyemi Jegede ◽  
Marjorie Glass Zauderer ◽  
Edith P. Mitchell ◽  
James Zwiebel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Genomic Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Outcome Analysis ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Match Trial ◽  
Best Response

3087 Background: The NCI-MATCH trial assigns patients (pts) with solid tumors, lymphomas, or multiple myeloma to targeted therapies based on genetic alterations identified in tumor biopsies. Neurofibromatosis 2 (NF2)-inactivated tumors demonstrate increased sensitivity to FAK inhibition in preclinical models. Arm U evaluated the FAK inhibitor defactinib in pts with NF2 altered tumors. Methods: Patients found to harbor an inactivating NF2 mutation on NGS were assigned to the ARM U substudy MATCH. Defactinib 400 mg was given by mouth twice daily until progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and 6-month PFS. Results: Of 5,548 cases with sufficient tissue for genomic analysis, 51 pts were found to have NF2 alterations (< 1% of the total analyzed). While NF2 alterations are known to occur more commonly in meningiomas and mesotheliomas, alterations were also detected in an array of other tumor types, including renal cell carcinomas and ovarian cancers. Thirty-five pts were ultimately enrolled; 33 patients were started on therapy, with 2 of those determined to be ineligible for outcome analysis. All pts had received at least one prior therapy, with 52% (16/31) having received 3 or more prior lines of therapy. Median follow-up was 35.9 months. ORR [90% CI] was 3% (1/31, [0.16, 14.86]), with the one partial response in a pt with choroid meningioma. Of the twelve pts whose best response was stable disease (39%, 12/31), 8 demonstrated some degree of tumor shrinkage (Table) with a disease control rate of 42% (13/31). Median PFS was 1.9 months for the 31 eligible pts who received study treatment, with median PFS of 9.3 months for the 9 patients who had a best response of stable disease or better. Six pts achieved a PFS of greater than 5.5 months. Among all treated pts (n=33), the most common treatment-related toxicities were fatigue (36%), nausea (33%), and hyperbilirubinemia (27%). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities; 27% of pts had grade 3 toxicities. No correlation could be made between clinical outcomes and tumor histology or specific NF2 genotype. Conclusions: Defactinib monotherapy had limited clinical activity in this cohort of previously treated patients with solid tumors exhibiting NF2 loss. Clinical trial information: NCT04439331. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Durable Response to the Combination of Atezolizumab With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in an Untreated Non-Smoking Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient With BRAF V600E Mutation: A Case Report

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaomin Niu ◽  
Yingjia Sun ◽  
David Planchard ◽  
Luting Chiu ◽  
Jian Bai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Nsclc Patient ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
First Line ◽  
Liquid Biopsies ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPi) has become a major treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and demonstrated a clinical benefit for NSCLC patients with high programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression without EGFR/ALK/ROS1 drivers; however, the benefit in BRAF V600E NSCLC is so far unknown. Here, we report a case of prolonged tumor response to the combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy in a non-smoking BRAF V600E NSCLC patient.Materials and MethodsWe verify a co-expression of BRAF V600E mutation and PD-L1 high expression more than 50% on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor sample of a newly diagnosed lung adenocarcinoma patient by immunohistochemistry and BRAF V600E/EGFR/ALK/ROS1 Mutations Detection Kit. The tissue and liquid biopsies were further subjected to next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identification of mutations with progression on immunotherapy and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi). The patient had provided written informed consent and authorized the publication of clinical case.ResultsWe demonstrate the case of 62-year-old female non-smoker with high PD-L1 expression and BRAF V600E mutated NSCLC. The progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line combination of atezolizumab with platinum-based chemotherapy and sequential second-line treatment with BRAFi Vemurafenib are 20 and 5.5 months, respectively.ConclusionThis case shows a durable response to ICPi in BRAF V600E non-smoking lung adenocarcinoma with PFS of 20 months under first-line atezolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment. The case supports the idea that the combination immunotherapy may be an attractive option for BRAF V600E mutated non-smoking NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression.

Assessment of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) versus treatment of physician’s choice (TPC) cohort by agent in the phase 3 ASCENT study of patients (pts) with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1077-1077
Author(s):  
Joyce O'Shaughnessy ◽  
Kevin Punie ◽  
Mafalda Oliveira ◽  
Filipa Lynce ◽  
Sara M. Tolaney ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Chemotherapy Agent ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

1077 Background: In pts with pretreated mTNBC, standard-of-care chemotherapy is associated with low objective response rates (ORRs) and short median progression-free survival (PFS). SG is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of an anti–Trop-2 antibody coupled to the cytotoxic SN-38 payload via a proprietary, hydrolyzable linker. SG received accelerated FDA approval for treatment of pts with mTNBC who have received ≥2 prior therapies for metastatic disease. The confirmatory phase 3 ASCENT study (NCT02574455) in pts with relapsed/refractory mTNBC demonstrated a significant survival benefit of SG over TPC (median PFS: 5.6 vs 1.7 mo, HR 0.41, P< 0.0001; median overall survival [OS]: 12.1 vs 6.7 mo, HR 0.48, P< 0.0001) with a tolerable safety profile. Here we summarize efficacy results for SG vs each TPC agent in ASCENT to examine how each TPC agent performed individually. Methods: Pts had mTNBC refractory to or progressing after ≥2 prior standard chemotherapy regimens. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive SG (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8, every 21 days) or single-agent TPC (eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, or gemcitabine). Primary endpoint was PFS per RECIST 1.1 by independent review in brain metastases-negative (BMNeg) pts. Secondary endpoints were ORR per RECIST 1.1, duration of response, OS, and safety. Outcomes for each of the agents in the TPC arm were analyzed and compared with SG. Results: Of 529 pts enrolled, 468 were BMNeg. Among pts in the TPC cohort (n = 233), eribulin was the most commonly chosen chemotherapy (n = 126), followed by vinorelbine (n = 47), capecitabine (n = 31), and gemcitabine (n = 29). Treatment with eribulin, vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine resulted in shorter median PFS vs SG (2.1, 1.6, 1.6, and 2.7 vs 5.6 mo, respectively); similar results were observed for median OS (6.9, 5.9, 5.2, and 8.4 vs 12.1 mo), ORR (5%, 4%, 6%, and 3% vs 35%), and clinical benefit rate (CBR; 8%, 6%, 10%, and 14% vs 45%). Key grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) with TPC overall vs SG included neutropenia (33% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), and anemia (5% vs 8%). Key grade ≥3 TRAEs with eribulin vs SG included neutropenia (30% vs 51%), leukopenia (5% vs 10%), fatigue (5% vs 3%), anemia (2% vs 8%), and peripheral neuropathy (2% vs none), respectively. The safety profiles of vinorelbine, capecitabine, and gemcitabine combined were consistent with that of TPC overall and with eribulin. One treatment-related death was reported for the TPC arm (eribulin) and none with SG. Conclusions: The efficacy benefit observed with SG vs TPC in pts with mTNBC was retained when evaluating each TPC chemotherapy agent individually. These results confirm that SG should be considered as a new standard of care in pts with pretreated mTNBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02574455 .

Investigate the efficacy of immunotherapy for treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 415-415
Author(s):  
Arish Noor ◽  
Luis E. Aguirre ◽  
Kirsten Blue ◽  
Trenton Avriett ◽  
Estrella M. Carballido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Duration Of Response

415 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been approved in solid tumors with dMMR. However, only limited data are available for PDAC with dMMR given the rarity of dMMR in PDAC. We evaluated efficacy of ICIs in PDAC with dMMR. Methods: Retrospective clinical and pathologic data were collected for patients (pts) with pancreatic adenocarcinoma from May 2017 to June 2020 at Moffitt cancer center. Results: We identified 10 pts with dMMR PDAC. The median age was 64.5 years (range: 42-86) and 4 pts were male. 4 pts had resectable disease, 3 had locally advanced and 3 had metastatic disease at initial diagnosis. MSH6 deficiency (def) was found in 2 cases, PMS2 def in 2, MLH/PMS2 def in 5, and MSH2/MSH6 in 1. 7 pts were treated with ICIs. 3 pts had locally advanced and 4 had metastatic disease when they started ICIs. 5 received Pembrolizumab (pem), 1 received ipilimumab/ nivolumab (ipi/nivo), and 1 received pem then ipi/nivo after progressive disease (PD) on pem. The median number of prior lines of chemotherapy was 1 (range 0-2). 6 pts were evaluable, and 1 had rapid disease progression after 1 dose of pem. Among 6 evaluable pts, 3 had an objective response (1: complete response and 2: partial response), and 2 had stable disease (SD). Median progression-free survival was 8.2 mo, and median overall survival was not reached with median follow-up (FU) of 6.8 mo. The median duration of response was not reached with a median FU of 22.6 mo. The pt with CR remained disease-free for up to 22 months. The pt whose treatment was switched to ipi/nivo after PD on pem achieved SD > 4mo on ipi/nivo. While on immunotherapy, one patient with ipi/nivo developed immunotherapy associated rash requiring systemic steroids, and another on pem developed hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine. Conclusions: This series suggest ICIs can provide durable clinical efficacy in pts with dMMR PDAC.

Matched therapies for advanced gastric cancer based on genotype: A real-world study in China.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16098-e16098
Author(s):  
Qin Liu ◽  
Ju Yang ◽  
Nandie Wu ◽  
Song Liu ◽  
Yipeng Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Kit Mutation

e16098 Background: Systemic therapy options for patients with advanced gastric cancer (GC) are limited. We here presented the efficacy results for advanced GC patients matched to targeted therapies or immunotherapies based on the identification of tumor tissue genotypes. Methods: We selected 30 patients diagnosed between 2014 and 2020 with advanced GC at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School identified with actionable alterations and received ≥1 matched therapies. Tumor biopsy specimens from the patients were analyzed using NGS and/or selected immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization. Results: In these 30 patients, median age at diagnosis was 63 years (range 28-83) and 6 (20%) were female. In total, 11 (37%) harbored c-MET amplification/overexpression (received savolitinib or crizotinib, cohort A), 9 (30%) harbored HER2 mutation/overexpression (received RC48-ADC or trastuzumab, cohort B), 6 (20%) dMMR/MSI-H/TMB-H (received sintilimab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab or nivolumab, combined with antivascular or not, cohort C), 2 (7%) KIT mutation/amplification (received imatinib or anlotinib, cohort D), 1 (3%) BRAF V600E mutation (received vemurafenib, cohort E) and 1 (3%) EGFR mutation (received afatinib, cohort F). Except for three patients in cohort C, all patients received at least one previous line systemic therapy. In cohort A, three of 11 patients had an objective response (1 complete response and 2 partial responses, objective response rate (ORR) 27%), disease control rate (DCR) was 45%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 2.1 months, and median overall survival (mOS) was 3.7 months. In cohort B, ORR was 44% (4/9), DCR was 78% (7/9), mPFS and mOS was 3.1 months and 5.5 months, respectively. In cohort C, ORR was 17% (1/6), DCR was 67% (4/6), mPFS and mOS was 1.9 months and 6.8 months, respectively. In cohort D, no patient had objective response or disease control. In cohort E, the one patient had PR. Stable disease was observed in the patient in cohort F. In all cohorts, ORR was 30% (9/30), DCR was 60% (18/30), mPFS and mOS was 2.7 months and 5.8 months, respectively. Conclusions: Overall, 30 patients with advanced GC were treated with matched therapies according to specific genotype. These real-world outcomes suggested that matched therapies for advanced GC has promising efficacy, supporting the adoption of genotyping in treatment determination.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document