Clinical implications of hyperprogression with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

6034 Background: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) refers to paradoxical acceleration of tumor growth kinetics (TGK) after initiation of treatment with anti- PD-1/PD- L1 agents and has been reported across tumor types in 4-29% of patients using different definitions. Preliminary data suggest that HPD might affect response to subsequent therapies. Methods: We compared TGK prior and TGK upon immunotherapy (IO) in 62 patients (pts) with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) HNSCC treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The TGK ratio (TGKR, ratio of tumor growth velocity before and upon treatment) was calculated. The first imaging assessment was performed 3 months (mo) after IO initiation. HPD was defined as 1. Radiological HPD (TGKR≥2) or 2. Clinical HPD (Disease-related rapid clinical deterioration post IO). Results: After median follow-up of 12.3 mo (range, 0.4-28.1), 43 pts progressed and 38 died. Median PFS was 2.8 mo (95%CI, 2.2-3.4) and median OS 8.6 mo (95%CI, 4.2-12.9). HPD was observed in 16 pts (25.8%), while 15 pts had early PD (Time to Treatment failure, TTF < 3 mo) and 31 late PD (TTF > 3mo). Among 16 pts with HPD, 11 had radiological HPD and 10 had clinical HPD. 4 pts had both clinical and radiological HPD. Pts with late PD had median OS 11.3 mo (95%CI, 9.3-13.3), those with early PD 5.2 mo (95%CI, 3.1-7.3 months) and those with HPD 5.1 mo (95%CI, 4.4-5.9) (p < 0.005). Regarding post-progression OS, pts with late PD had median 11.3 mo (95%CI 0-22.8), those with early PD 2.5 mo (95%CI 0.6-4.4) and those with HPD 4.2 mo (95%CI 1.7-6.7) (p = 0.001). Pts with HPD had a trend for longer median post-progression OS compared to pts with early PD (p = 0.121). Median PFS with chemotherapy after immunotherapy failure was 3.0 mo (95%CI 2.4-3.6) for pts with late PD, 2.1 mo (95%CI 0.9-3.4) for pts with early PD and 6.1 mo (95%CI 3.0-9.3) for those with HPD (p = 0.040). HPD was associated with longer median PFS with chemotherapy compared to pts with early PD (p = 0.016), while the difference in median PFS with chemotherapy between pts with HPD and late progressors was non-statistically significant (p = 0.260). Conclusions: Radiological or clinical HPD was observed in 25.8% of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with IO. Early progression to immunotherapy is an important predictor of short survival, while HPD was associated with improved PFS to subsequent chemotherapy.

Download Full-text

What’s the difference between hyperprogressive disease and progressive disease for patients with treated immune checkpoint inhibitors?

10.21203/rs.3.rs-1184111/v1 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Hasan Çağrı Yıldırım ◽

Deniz Can Guven ◽

Oktay Halit Aktepe ◽

Hakan Taban ◽

Feride Yilmaz ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progressive Disease ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Performance Status ◽

Ecog Performance Status ◽

The Difference ◽

Hyperprogressive Disease ◽

The Relationship

Abstract Background Although the immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer care, many patients do not respond to treatment. Some of the patients in this group, which is considered to have hyperprogressive disease (HPD), have a shorter overall survival compared to progressive disease (PD). Therefore, biomarkers are needed to differentiate between HPD and PD. Here, we evaluated PILE score to differentiate HPD from PD in patients treated with ICI. Methods Ninety-five patients treated with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 inhibitors for any type of cancer with progression according to RECIST criteria in the first control imaging were included. HPD was defined according to Russo's work. The PILE scoring system was calculated, including PIV (< median vs. ≥ median), LDH (normal and > normal), and ECOG performance status (0 vs. ≥ 1). The relationship between PILE score and HPD was examined. Results The median follow-up was 6.6 months and the median OS of all cohort were 11.18 ± 1.36 months. The patients in the HPD group had decreased OS (4.77 ± 0.89 vs. 13.94 ± 1.80 months, p <0.001) and PFS (1.89 ± 0.11 vs. 3.16 ± 0.12 months, p <0.001) compared to PD group. The risk of HPD was higher than the risk of PD in patİents with a high PILE score (p:0.001). Conclusion In this study, we showed that patients treated with ICI with a higher PILE score are at greater risk for HPD. If prospective studies confirm our results, the PILE score may be a biomarker to differentiate HPD from PD.

Download Full-text

Hyperprogressive disease during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21664 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e21664-e21664 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Pablo Ayala de Miguel ◽

Javier López Gallego ◽

Itziar Gorospe García ◽

Pablo René Rivera Vargas ◽

Andrea Posada Restrepo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Multivariate Analysis ◽

Tumor Growth ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Advanced Nsclc ◽

Cox Regression ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽

Hyperprogressive Disease ◽

Metastatic Sites

e21664 Background: Hyperprogressive disease (HPD) is a new pattern of progressión during immunotherapy and is described as an acceleration of tumor growth during treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The rate of HPD in advanced solid tumors remains unknown, but it has been reported in 9% to 29% of patients in two recent series. Our aim was to study prognostic factors of HPD. Methods: We collected data of 104 patients diagnosed of advanced NSCLC and treated with ICI in monotherapy at our institution between December 2015 and December 2019. Several variables as clinical, tumour-related and therapeutical were included in the analysis. The variables were compared by chi-square and Fisher test, then we performed a multivariate logistic regression model to analyse the effects of the covariates, and finally we performed a Kaplan Meier survival analysis. We described HPD as disease progression at first evaluation with an increase in tumor growth rate exceeding 50%, according to Gustave Roussy criteria previously reported. Results: Cohort of 84 men and 20 women, median age of 67 years and 86% with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0-1. 89% were active or ex-smokers and 11% had never smoked. 60% of patients had adenocarcinoma histology, 39% scamous and 1% had not otherwise specified (NOS) carcinoma histology. 3% of patients had III-B stage at the moment of start of immunotherapy, 37% M1a, 30% M1b and 30% M1c. 2 patients had driver mutations in EGFR gene. 41% of patients had unknown PDL1 status; 14% had no PDL1 expression, 14% low expression and 31% high expression. 78% of patients had progressed to prior line of treatment, while 22% were treatment-naive. Nine of 104 patients (8.7%) in our population developed HPD during treatment with ICI. HPD occured within the first two months of treatment in all 9 patients, and was associated with worse overall survival in the multivariate analysis by Cox regression (12.6 vs 2.6 months; HR 13.94, p < 0.001). The presence of 2 or more metastatic sites was related to the development of HPD in the multivariate analysis (HR 8.59, p = 0.026). Conclusions: The incidence of HPD in our population is concordant with previous report about this topic. As previously described by Ferrara et al, HPD was significantly associated with a high number of metastatic sites before start treatment with ICI and correlated with poor outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Download Full-text

Redefine Hyperprogressive Disease During Treatment With Immune-Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancer

Frontiers in Oncology ◽

10.3389/fonc.2021.761110 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 11 ◽

Author(s):

Zhenghang Wang ◽

Chang Liu ◽

Yuezong Bai ◽

Xiaochen Zhao ◽

Longgang Cui ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Tumor Growth ◽

Signaling Pathway ◽

Growth Kinetics ◽

Gastrointestinal Cancer ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Genomic Alterations ◽

Hyperprogressive Disease

ObjectiveEmerging evidence showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) lead to hyperprogressive disease (HPD) in a small proportion of patients. There is no well-recognized standard for the evaluation of HPD. Comprehensive exploration of HPD definition system in gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI is lacking to date.MethodsA total of 126 patients with advanced or metastatic gastrointestinal cancer treated with ICI monotherapy were analyzed. Seven definitions of HPD were defined with tumor growth kinetics (TGK) or tumor growth rate (TGR) by including new lesions or not, and with different cutoffs. Incidence and performance of different criteria were compared. Clinicopathologic characteristics and baseline genomic variations associated with HPD were also explored.ResultsTumor growth kinetics ratio of more than two fold that incorporated new lesions into calculation of HPD outperformed other definitions by successfully stratifying 14 patients (11.1%) with both accelerated disease progression (median PFS, 1.62 versus 1.93 months; hazard ratio, 1.85; 95% CI, 0.98 to 3.48; P = 0.059) and worse overall survival (median OS, 3.97 versus 10.23 months; hazard ratio, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.11 to 4.78; P = 0.021). Baseline genomic alterations in circulating tumor DNA, including SMARCA2, MSH6, APC signaling pathway, and Wnt signaling pathway, might be associated with the risk of HPD.ConclusionIncorporating new lesions emerging during the treatment was shown to be reliable for the assessment of TGK. TGK serves as a more convenient way to reflect tumor growth acceleration compared with TGR. Genomic alterations were suggested to be associated with the occurrence of HPD.

Download Full-text

Treatment of Angiosarcoma with Pazopanib and Paclitaxel: Results of the EVA (Evaluation of Votrient® in Angiosarcoma) Phase II Trial of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group (GISG-06)

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13061223 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (6) ◽

pp. 1223

Author(s):

Daniel Pink ◽

Dimosthenis Andreou ◽

Sebastian Bauer ◽

Thomas Brodowicz ◽

Bernd Kasper ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Median Overall Survival ◽

Phase Ii Trial ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Safety And Efficacy ◽

Future Studies ◽

Entire Cohort

We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of paclitaxel combined with pazopanib in advanced angiosarcoma (AS). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) rate at six months (PFSR6). Planned accrual was 44 patients in order to detect a PFSR6 of >55%, with an interim futility analysis of the first 14 patients. The study did not meet its predetermined interim target of 6/14 patients progression-free at 6 months. At the time of this finding, 26 patients had been enrolled between July 2014 and April 2016, resulting in an overrunning of 12 patients. After a median follow-up of 9.5 (IQR 7.7–15.4) months, PFSR6 amounted to 46%. Two patients had a complete and seven patients a partial response. Patients with superficial AS had a significantly higher PFSR6 (61% vs. 13%, p = 0.0247) and PFS (11.3 vs. 2.7 months, p < 0.0001) compared to patients with visceral AS. The median overall survival in the entire cohort was 21.6 months. A total of 10 drug-related serious adverse effects were reported in 5 patients, including a fatal hepatic failure. Although our study did not meet its primary endpoint, the median PFS of 11.6 months in patients with superficial AS appears to be promising. Taking recent reports into consideration, future studies should evaluate the safety and efficacy of VEGFR and immune checkpoint inhibitors with or without paclitaxel in a randomized, multiarm setting.

Download Full-text

Inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR Pathway in Breast Cancer to Enhance Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Breast Cancer

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22105207 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 22 (10) ◽

pp. 5207

Author(s):

Chi Yan ◽

Jinming Yang ◽

Nabil Saleh ◽

Sheau-Chiann Chen ◽

Gregory D. Ayers ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

T Cells ◽

Tumor Growth ◽

Cd8 T Cells ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Mtor Pathway ◽

Complete Regression ◽

Mtor Inhibition

Objectives: Inhibition of the PI3K/mTOR pathway suppresses breast cancer (BC) growth, enhances anti-tumor immune responses, and works synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). The objective here was to identify a subclass of PI3K inhibitors that, when combined with paclitaxel, is effective in enhancing response to ICI. Methods: C57BL/6 mice were orthotopically implanted with syngeneic luminal/triple-negative-like PyMT cells exhibiting high endogenous PI3K activity. Tumor growth in response to treatment with anti-PD-1 + anti-CTLA-4 (ICI), paclitaxel (PTX), and either the PI3Kα-specific inhibitor alpelisib, the pan-PI3K inhibitor copanlisib, or the broad spectrum PI3K/mTOR inhibitor gedatolisib was evaluated in reference to monotherapy or combinations of these therapies. Effects of these therapeutics on intratumoral immune populations were determined by multicolor FACS. Results: Treatment with alpelisib + PTX inhibited PyMT tumor growth and increased tumor-infiltrating granulocytes but did not significantly affect the number of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells and did not synergize with ICI. Copanlisib + PTX + ICI significantly inhibited PyMT growth and increased activation of intratumoral CD8+ T cells as compared to ICI alone, yet did not inhibit tumor growth more than ICI alone. In contrast, gedatolisib + ICI resulted in significantly greater inhibition of tumor growth compared to ICI alone and induced durable dendritic-cell, CD8+ T-cell, and NK-cell responses. Adding PTX to this regimen yielded complete regression in 60% of tumors. Conclusion: PI3K/mTOR inhibition plus PTX heightens response to ICI and may provide a viable therapeutic approach for treatment of metastatic BC.

Download Full-text

Enhance the Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Efficacy with Radiotherapy Induced Immunogenic Cell Death: A Comprehensive Review and Latest Developments

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13040678 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (4) ◽

pp. 678 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Adrien Procureur ◽

Audrey Simonaggio ◽

Jean-Emmanuel Bibault ◽

Stéphane Oudard ◽

Yann-Alexandre Vano

Keyword(s):

Cell Death ◽

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Tumor Antigens ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Mitotic Cell ◽

Immunogenic Cell Death ◽

Dna Damages ◽

Multiple Tumor ◽

Tumor Types

The immunogenic cell death (ICD) is defined as a regulated cell death able to induce an adaptive immunity. It depends on different parameters including sufficient antigenicity, adjuvanticity and favorable microenvironment conditions. Radiation therapy (RT), a pillar of modern cancer treatment, is being used in many tumor types in curative, (neo) adjuvant, as well as metastatic settings. The anti-tumor effects of RT have been traditionally attributed to the mitotic cell death resulting from the DNA damages triggered by the release of reactive oxygen species. Recent evidence suggests that RT may also exert its anti-tumor effect by recruiting tumor-specific immunity. RT is able to induce the release of tumor antigens, to act as an immune adjuvant and thus to synergize with the anti-tumor immunity. The advent of new efficient immunotherapeutic agents, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), in multiple tumor types sheds new light on the opportunity of combining RT and ICI. Here, we will describe the biological and radiobiological rationale of the RT-induced ICD. We will then focus on the interest to combine RT and ICI, from bench to bedside, and summarize the clinical data existing with this combination. Finally, RT technical adaptations to optimize the ICD induction will be discussed.

Download Full-text

Association of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index with Immunotherapy Outcomes in Mismatch Repair Deficient Tumors

Cancers ◽

10.3390/cancers13153776 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 13 (15) ◽

pp. 3776

Author(s):

Edouard Auclin ◽

Perrine Vuagnat ◽

Cristina Smolenschi ◽

Julien Taieb ◽

Jorge Adeva ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Performance Status ◽

Prognostic Index ◽

Predictive Marker ◽

Risk Groups ◽

Two Factors ◽

One Year ◽

Metastatic Sites ◽

Tumor Types

Background: MSI-H/dMMR is considered the first predictive marker of efficacy for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, around 39% of cases are refractory and additional biomarkers are needed. We explored the prognostic value of pretreatment LIPI in MSI-H/dMMR patients treated with ICIs, including identification of fast-progressors. Methods: A multicenter retrospective study of patients with metastatic MSI-H/dMMR tumors treated with ICIs between April 2014 and May 2019 was performed. LIPI was calculated based on dNLR > 3 and LDH > upper limit of normal. LIPI groups were good (zero factors), intermediate (one factor) and poor (two factors). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), including the fast-progressor rate (OS < 3 months). Results: A total of 151 patients were analyzed, mainly female (59%), with median age 64 years, performance status (PS) 0 (42%), and sporadic dMMR status (68%). ICIs were administered as first or second-line for 59%. The most frequent tumor types were gastrointestinal (66%) and gynecologic (22%). LIPI groups were good (47%), intermediate (43%), and poor (10%). The median follow-up was 32 months. One-year OS rates were 81.0%, 67.1%, and 21.4% for good, intermediate, and poor-risk groups (p <0.0001). After adjustment for tumor site, metastatic sites and PS, LIPI remained independently associated with OS (HR, poor-LIPI: 3.50, 95%CI: 1.46–8.40, p = 0.02. Overall, the fast-progressor rate was 16.0%, and 35.7% with poor-LIPI vs. 7.5% in the good-LIPI group (p = 0.02). Conclusions: LIPI identifies dMMR patients who do not benefit from ICI treatment, particularly fast-progressors. LIPI should be included as a stratification factor for future trials.

Download Full-text

Is There a Place for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Vulvar Neoplasms? A State of the Art Review

International Journal of Molecular Sciences ◽

10.3390/ijms22010190 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 22 (1) ◽

pp. 190

Author(s):

Fulvio Borella ◽

Mario Preti ◽

Luca Bertero ◽

Giammarco Collemi ◽

Isabella Castellano ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

State Of The Art ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Early Stage ◽

Survival Rates ◽

Younger Women ◽

Multiple Tumor ◽

Tumor Types

Vulvar cancer (VC) is a rare neoplasm, usually arising in postmenopausal women, although human papilloma virus (HPV)-associated VC usually develop in younger women. Incidences of VCs are rising in many countries. Surgery is the cornerstone of early-stage VC management, whereas therapies for advanced VC are multimodal and not standardized, combining chemotherapy and radiotherapy to avoid exenterative surgery. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are scarce due to the rarity of the disease and prognosis has not improved. Hence, new therapies are needed to improve the outcomes of these patients. In recent years, improved knowledge regarding the crosstalk between neoplastic and tumor cells has allowed researchers to develop a novel therapeutic approach exploiting these molecular interactions. Both the innate and adaptive immune systems play a key role in anti-tumor immunesurveillance. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in multiple tumor types, improving survival rates and disease outcomes. In some gynecologic cancers (e.g., cervical cancer), many studies are showing promising results and a growing interest is emerging about the potential use of ICIs in VC. The aim of this manuscript is to summarize the latest developments in the field of VC immunoncology, to present the role of state-of-the-art ICIs in VC management and to discuss new potential immunotherapeutic approaches.

Download Full-text

MO368THE INCIDENCE AND RISK FACTORS FOR ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS: A REAL-LIFE STUDY

Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation ◽

10.1093/ndt/gfab082.0022 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽

Author(s):

Deniz Can Güven ◽

Deniz Aral Ozbek ◽

Taha Koray Sahin ◽

Melek Seren Aksun ◽

Gozde Kavgaci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Chronic Kidney Disease ◽

Clinical Trials ◽

Kidney Disease ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Multivariate Analyses ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Real Life ◽

Kidney Injury

Abstract Background and Aims The immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) became a vital part of cancer treatment. The ICIs seem to be safer than chemotherapy for kidneys in clinical trials. However, recent observational studies from high-resource settings pointed out the possible underreporting of renal adverse events like acute kidney injury (AKI) in the clinical trials due to focusing only to the renal immune-related adverse events. Additionally, clinical trials generally enroll a fitter population with lesser comorbidities and include mostly treatment-naive patients making studies in real-life cohorts imperative for evaluating the AKI rates during ICI treatment. From these points, we aimed to evaluate the AKI rates and predisposing factors in ICI-treated patients. Method This retrospective study has evaluated the data of adult metastatic cancer patients treated with ICIs in Hacettepe University Cancer Center from 01.2014 to 12.2019. All patients other than the ones treated within the context of clinical trials or followed in other institutions after the first dose of ICIs were included. Baseline demographics, cancer types, patient weight and heights, ICI type and the number of cycles, serum creatinine and the estimated GFR values under treatment, regular medications, and comorbidities were recorded. AKI was defined by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. The predisposing factors to AKI development were evaluated with the univariate and multivariate analyses. Results A total of 147 patients were included in the analyses. Median age was 61 [interquartile range (IQR) 51-67], and 69.4% of the patients were male. Patients were given a median of 8 (IQR 5-17) ICI cycles. Patients with melanoma (24.5%), non-small cell lung cancer (15%), and renal cell carcinoma (25.9%) comprised almost 2/3 of the cohort and 72.8% of the patients were treated with nivolumab. Hypertension was the most common comorbidity (38.1%), followed by chronic kidney disease (21.2%) and type 2 diabetes (19.7%). Median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 8 (7-9). Median follow-up was 10.3 (IQR 6.3-19.4) months, and patients had median 9 (IQR 5-18) serum creatinine measurements. During the follow-up, 28 patients (19%) had at least one AKI episode with multiple AKI episodes in 3 patients (10.7%). The median time to AKI development was 2.53 (IQR 1.39-6.19) months. Almost all AKI events were mild (grade 1 or 2 in 27/28) and reversible (25/28). In univariate analyses, coronary artery disease (CAD) (p=<0.001), chronic kidney disease (CKD) (p=0.002), previous nephrectomy (p=0.015), iodinated contrast exposure in the week before immunotherapy (p=0.035), the use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (p=0.046) or proton pump inhibitors (PPI) (p=0.041) was associated with an increased AKI risk. The association between diabetes (p=0.067), higher CCI (9 vs. ≥9, p=0.107), baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels (p=0.177), and performance status (ECOG 0 vs. ≥1, p=0.235) and AKI risk did not reach statistical significance. In multivariate analyses, patients with CKD (OR: 3.719, 95% CI: 1.375- 10.057, p=0.010) or CAD (OR: 4.774, 95% CI: 1.803- 12.641, p=0.002) had increased AKI risk. Additionally, regular PPI use (OR: 2.734, 95% CI: .991- 7.542, p=0.052) had borderline statistical significance for AKI development. The development of AKI was not associated with decreased survival (HR: 0.726, 95% CI: 0.409-1.291, p=0.276). Conclusion In this study, we observed AKI development under ICIs in almost one in five cancer patients. The increased AKI rates in patients with CAD, CKD, or regular PPI use pointed out the need for better onco-nephrology collaboration in all ICI-treated patients, with a particular emphasis in these high-risk patients.

Download Full-text

The association between albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) and survival in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Cancer Biomarkers ◽

10.3233/cbm-210349 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-11

Author(s):

Deniz Can Guven ◽

Oktay Halit Aktepe ◽

Melek Seren Aksun ◽

Taha Koray Sahin ◽

Gozde Kavgaci ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Immune Checkpoint ◽

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Multivariate Analyses ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Free Survival ◽

Patients With Cancer ◽

Early Progression ◽

Term Benefit

BACKGROUND: The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) could be a prognostic biomarker in patients with cancer, although the data is limited in patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). OBJECTIVES: We aimed to evaluate the association between AGR and survival in ICI-treated patients. METHODS: The data of 212 advanced-stage patients were retrospectively evaluated in this cohort study. The association between AGR with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated with multivariate analyses. Additionally, receptor operating curve (ROC) analysis was conducted to assess the AGR’s predictive power in the very early progression (progression within two months) and long-term benefit (more than twelve months survival). RESULTS: The median AGR was calculated as 1.21, and patients were classified into AGR-low and high subgroups according to the median. In the multivariate analyses, patients with lower AGR (< 1.21) had decreased OS (HR: 1.530, 95% CI: 1.100–2.127, p= 0.011) and PFS (HR: 1.390, 95% CI: 1.020–1.895, p= 0.037). The area under curve of AGR to detect early progression and long-term benefit were 0.654 (95% CI: 0.562–0.747, p= 0.001) and 0.671 (95% CI: 0.598–0.744, p< 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, survival with ICIs was impaired in patients with lower AGR. Additionally, the AGR values could detect the very early progression and long-term benefit ICIs.

Download Full-text