Camrelizumab in advanced or metastatic solid tumor patients with microsatellite instability–high/mismatch repair-deficient: Results from an open-label exploratory study.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15140-e15140
Author(s):  
Jingde Chen ◽  
Ming Quan ◽  
Zhiqin Chen ◽  
Tianmei Zeng ◽  
Yandong Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Metastatic Solid Tumor ◽  
Cancer Types

e15140 Background: PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor has been shown a significant effect in patients (pts) with microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) solid tumor. Herein, we assessed the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab, a PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, in advanced or metastatic solid tumor pts with MSI-H/dMMR. Methods: Pts with MSI-H/dMMR solid tumor who had received at least one line of prior systemic chemotherapy were recruited in this single-arm exploratory study. Pts received camrelizumab (200mg, ivd, D1/2W) until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Response was assessed every 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST v1.1 criteria. This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-OIC-17013249. Results: From November 2017 to February 27, 2019, 12 eligible pts were recruited, which covered 9 cancer types. The median age was 58 (range 27-72) years; male/female was 58.3/41.7%. 11 pts were confirmed as MSI-H status, and 1 patient as d-MMR status. All pts were included in efficacy and safety analysis. 2 pts achieved complete response (CR), 6 pts partial response (PR), 4 pts stable disease (SD), yielding the ORR of 66.7% (95% CI: 34.9-90.1), and the disease control rate of 100% (95% CI 73.5-100) at best. What’s more, cancer types of CR pts covered rectal cancer and bladder cancer (1 patient each); PR pts included colon cancer, liver cancer, endometrial cancer, ureteric cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and small intestine cancer (1 patient each); SD pts contained 3 colon cancer pts and 1 retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma patient. The overall incidence of adverse incidences (AEs) was 100%. The incidence of Grade ≥3 AEs was 58.3%, which mainly included anemia (16.7%), increased γ-transglutaminase (16.7%), increased alkaline phosphatase (16.7%), increased blood bilirubin (16.7%). As of Oct 30, 2019, 11 pts were still on study medication. Conclusions: Camrelizumab resulted in encouraging objective response and tolerable toxicity in MSI-H/dMMR advanced or metastatic solid tumor. The survival benefits will be further observed. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR-OIC-17013249 .

Selpercatinib efficacy and safety in patients with RET-altered thyroid cancer: A clinical trial update.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6073-6073
Author(s):  
Eric Jeffrey Sherman ◽  
Lori J. Wirth ◽  
Manisha H. Shah ◽  
Maria E. Cabanillas ◽  
Bruce Robinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Integrated Analysis ◽  
Low Grade ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Thyroid Cancers ◽  
Altered Thyroid

6073 Background: Selpercatinib, is a first-in-class, highly selective, CNS active and potent RET inhibitor approved in multiple countries for treatment of RET-fusion positive lung or thyroid cancers. Reported is an update of efficacy and safety results in RET-altered thyroid cancer, with a longer follow up (30 Mar 2020 data cutoff vs 16 Dec 2019) and additional enrolment. Methods: Patients (pts) with RET-mutant medullary thyroid cancer (MTC) and RET-fusion positive thyroid cancer (TC) were enrolled in the global (16 countries, 89 sites) Phase 1/2 LIBRETTO-001 trial (NCT03157128). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR+PR+SD ≥16 weeks), and safety. The integrated analysis set (IAS, n = 143) includes efficacy evaluable MTC pts previously treated with cabozantinib and/or vandetanib (cabo/vande). The primary analysis set (PAS), a subset of IAS, is the first 55 enrolled pts. Cabo/vande naïve MTC pts (N = 112) and TC pts with prior systemic treatment (N = 22) were also analyzed. Safety population includes all pts who received ≥1 dose of selpercatinib (MTC N = 315; TC N = 42) by data cutoff. Results: For MTC patients, the ORR for IAS was 69.2%, in the PAS it was 69.1%, and 71.4% for cabo/vande naïve MTC pts. The ORR for TC pts (n = 22) was 77.3% (see table). Most treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were low grade; the most common (≥25% of MTC and/or TC pts treated with selpercatinib) were dry mouth, diarrhea, hypertension, fatigue and constipation for both MTC and TC pts, increased ALT/AST, peripheral edema and headache in MTC pts and nausea in TC pts. 4.8% of MTC and TC pts discontinued selpercatinib due to TEAEs but only 1.9% with MTC and none with TC discontinued due to treatment-related adverse events. Conclusions: In this updated analysis, selpercatinib continued to show marked and durable antitumor activity in pts with RET-altered thyroid cancers. Selpercatinib was well tolerated and no new safety concerns were identified. A global, randomized, phase 3 trial (LIBRETTO-531) evaluating selpercatinib compared to cabo/vande in kinase inhibitor naïve MTC pts is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03157128. [Table: see text]

Efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoint inhibitors in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunhui Jin ◽  
Xiaodan Zhu ◽  
Xiaona Huang ◽  
Tingjie Gong ◽  
Zhipeng Wei ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Adverse Event Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Deficient Mismatch Repair

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD-1/PD-L1 and/or CTLA-4 inhibitors in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) by meta-analysis. Methods: Electronic databases were searched. Eligible studies included investigations of efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 or anti-CTLA-4 agents in patients with CRC. Corresponding indicators were calculated. Results: A total of 15 articles were included. The pooled objective response rate, overall survival rate, progression-free survival rate and adverse event rate were 33, 56, 46 and 59%, respectively. The objective response rates for CRC with deficient mismatch repair and CRC with proficient mismatch repair were 43 and 3%, respectively, in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors. Conclusion: The authors' study indicates that PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors manifest promising clinical responses in the treatment of CRC with deficient mismatch repair with acceptable treatment-related adverse events.

The efficacy and safety of anlotinib in neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced thyroid cancer: A single-arm phase II clinical trial.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6069-6069
Author(s):  
Naisi Huang ◽  
Guohua Sun ◽  
Yulong Wang ◽  
Jiaying Chen ◽  
Qing Guan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Primary Treatment ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Advanced Thyroid Cancer

6069 Background: Surgery is the primary treatment for locally advanced thyroid cancer (TC). For some locally advanced TC, R0/R1 resection could not be achieved at initial diagnosis and neoadjuvant treatment would be an option. However, there is still little evidence regarding neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced TC. Methods: This single-arm, phase 2 study investigated the efficacy and safety of Anlotinib (12mg orally daily, for two weeks on/on week off) for 2-6 cycles in patients with locally advanced TC in the neoadjuvant setting. Operable patients received surgery after neoadjuvant treatment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: A total of 13 patients were included and received an average of 3.5 cycles (range: 3-6 cycles) of Anlotinib treatment. 12 cases were papillary thyroid cancer, and 1 was follicular thyroid cancer. The ORR of Anlotinib was 76.9% with 10 partial response (PR), 2 stable disease (SD), and 1 progressive disease (PD). 8 PR and 1 SD patients received surgery after neoadjuvant treatment, of whom 8 had R0/1 resections and 1 had R2 resection. 2 PR patients refused to have surgery and the rest 2 patients were not operable. The R0/1 resection rate for intent to treat population was 61.5% and for per-protocol population was 72.7%. The maximum reduction in sum of tumor diameter was an average of 34.8% (range: 30.9%-45.5%) for PR patients. Most adverse events were grade 1 or 2. Common adverse events of all grade were hypertension (76.9%), hypertriglyceridemia (69.2%), proteinuria (53.8%), TSH increase (53.8%), cholesterol elevation (53.8%) and hand-foot syndrome (38.5%). The majority of adverse events discontinued after the neoadjuvant treatment stopped. Conclusions: Anlotinib demonstrated antitumor activity in the neoadjuvant treatment in locally advanced TC and the majority of patients achieved R0/1 resection. Adverse events were consistent with the known Anlotinib adverse event profile. These results suggest that Anlotinib neoadjuvant treatment represents a new option for locally advanced TC. Clinical trial information: NCT04309136.

TiFFANY study: A multicenter phase II basket-type clinical trial to evaluate efficacy and safety of pan-FGFR inhibitor TAS-120 for advanced solid malignancies with FGFR alterations identified by circulating tumor DNA.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3156-TPS3156
Author(s):  
Tomoko Jogo ◽  
Yoshiaki Nakamura ◽  
Yoshito Komatsu ◽  
Ken Kato ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Circulating Tumor Dna ◽  
Survival Duration ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Solid Malignancies ◽  
Ctdna Analysis ◽  
Tumor Dna

TPS3156 Background: Approximately 7% of advanced solid malignancies have FGFR gene alterations. However, standard treatment for FGFR-altered malignancies has not been established. Moreover, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has a potential to accurately identify FGFR alterations by assessing spatial and temporal intratumoral heterogeneity, which have shown to be associated with a poor prognosis and resistance to anti-cancer therapy. Methods: We are conducting an investigator-initiated multicenter phase II basket-type trial to investigate efficacy and safety of TAS-120, a highly selective covalent pan-FGFR inhibitor, for the patients with advanced solid malignancies with FGFR alterations identified by ctDNA analysis as a part of the Nationwide Cancer Genome Screening Project (GOZILA study, UMIN000029315). Eligibility criteria include histologically confirmed unresectable advanced or recurrent solid tumors regardless of histology of origin; ECOG PS of 0 or 1; refractory or intolerant to the standard therapies; and clonal FGFR alterations ( FGFR1-3 gain-of-function mutations, FGFR1,2 amplifications and FGFR2,3 fusions) identified by a 73-gene sequencing ctDNA panel (Guardant360). Enrolled patients will receive TAS-120 20 mg once daily, orally, in a 21 day-cycle. The primary endpoint is to clarify objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigators per RECIST v1.1. The secondary endpoints are to evaluate progression-free survival, duration of response, time to treatment failure, disease control rate, overall survival, ORR by central determination, and incidence of adverse events. Target sample size is determined as 26 to test the null hypothesis of ORR as 5% with one-sided alpha level of 2.5% and power of 80% to detect an expected value of ORR as 25%. Furthermore, tumor tissue and ctDNA will be serially collected and analyzed to investigate the resistance mechanisms and provide clinically meaningful biomarker which may be used for identifying and implementing treatment changes. Clinical trial information: 194624.

Efficacy and safety of bevacizumab biosimilar FKB238 versus originator bevacizumab: Results from a phase III trial in patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21728-e21728
Author(s):  
Konstantinos N. Syrigos ◽  
Dongyue Fu ◽  
Stephanie Jones ◽  
Zahid Bashir ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Double Blind

e21728 Background: Bevacizumab (bev) is a recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to VEGF-A and prevents it from interacting with its receptors, thereby inhibiting formation of new tumor vasculature to block tumor growth. FKB238, a bev biosimilar, has similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles to originator bev (o-bev). This phase 3 trial (NCT02810457) compared the efficacy and safety of FKB238 with o-bev in patients with advanced/recurrent non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS-NSCLC). Methods: This global, multicenter, double-blind, parallel, randomized, comparative clinical trial enrolled and randomized 731 patients with advanced/recurrent NS-NSCLC to receive 15 mg/kg intravenous (IV) infusion of either FKB238 (N = 364) or o-bev (N = 367). All patients received IV infusions of paclitaxel (200 mg/m2) and carboplatin (AUC 6.0) immediately prior to investigational drugs for 4-6 cycles. FKB238 and o-bev were administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle until objective progressive disease or other discontinuation criteria were met. Results: The objective response rate (ORR) based on blinded independent central review assessment for the intent-to-treat population was 51.6% and 53.7% for patients in the FKB238 and o-bev arms, respectively. The FKB238/o-bev ORR ratio was 0.96 (90% CI: 0.86 to 1.08) and the 90% CI fell within the pre-specified equivalence margin. The estimated proportion of patients alive and progression free at 12 months was 25.0% in the FKB238 arm vs 25.3% in the o-bev arm (HR of 0.97, 95% CI 0.82-1.16). The estimated median progression-free survival was 7.72 months in the FKB238 arm and 7.62 months in the o-bev arm. TEAEs were reported for 94.2% (FKB238) and 95.1% (o-bev) of patients. TEAEs ≥ grade 3 were reported for 53.6% (FKB238) and 55.5% (o-bev) of patients. SAEs were reported for 25.1% and 26.0% of patients treated with FKB238 and o-bev, respectively. Conclusions: There were no meaningful differences in efficacy and safety between FKB238 or o-bev in patients with NS-NSCLC. ORR efficacy equivalence was demonstrated, and the safety profiles of both drugs were similar. Clinical trial information: NCT02810457.

Avelumab and cetuximab in combination with FOLFOX in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC): The phase II AVETUX-CRC trial (AIO KRK 0216).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS3620-TPS3620 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Stein ◽  
Mascha Binder ◽  
Carsten Bokemeyer ◽  
Salah Eddin Al Batran ◽  
Axel Hinke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Type I ◽  
Translational Research Program ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

TPS3620 Background: Inhibition of the PD-1/L1 axis has shown to improve survival as single agent in a variety of tumor types. The efficacy of single agent PD-1/L1 inhibition in patients with treatment refractory MCRC seems to be limited to hypermutated tumors characterized by mismatch repair deficiency. 1st line chemotherapy (e.g. FOLFOX) with cetuximab for patients with RAS/BRAF wildtype MCRC result in objective response rates of about 60%, thus substantial antigen release will likely occur triggering immune control. Furthermore, the induction of immunogenic cell death has been recently shown for cetuximab-based regimen. Thus, the evaluation of FOLFOX and cetuximab in combination with avelumab in 1st line MCRC is of particular interest. Methods: AVETUX is a single arm exploratory phase II investigator initiated trial. Patients with RAS/BRAF wildtype MCRC will be included independent of mismatch repair status to receive mFOLFOX6 and cetuximab in combination with avelumab (10mg/kg from day 1 of cycle 2 onwards). Treatment with avelumab is limited to a maximum of 18 months. Primary endpoint is 12month progression-free survival rate, which should be increased from 40% to 57%, with type I error of 10% and 80% power, leading to a sample size of 43 patients. An early stopping rule will be applied in case of an increase in toxicity after the first 15 patients received at least two months of treatment. The trial is flanked by a large translational program including immunoprofiling to determine and correlate the respective immune response signatures with clonal dynamics (RAS/EGFR). Recruitment will start in 11 German sites early 2017. Clinical trial information: EudraCT No 2016-004434-26. Conclusion: The AVETUX trial will determine the feasibility and early efficacy of FOLFOX and cetuximab combined with avelumab in 1st line MCRC. The translational research program will shed light on the potential mode of action of this novel combination. Clinical trial information: 2016-004434-26.

Efficacy and safety of liposomal mitoxantrone (Lipo-MIT) in advanced breast cancer (ABC): A randomized, open label, active-controlled, single-center, phase II clinical trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1093-1093
Author(s):  
Leiping Wang ◽  
Yannan Zhao ◽  
Ting Li ◽  
Jun Cao ◽  
Yiqun Du ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Lower Incidence ◽  
Troponin T ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Phase Ii Clinical Trial ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Open Label

1093 Background: Anthracyclines are associated with cardiotoxicity and myelosuppression in breast cancer (BC) patients. A new drug delivery system, liposomal preparation has shown higher anti-cancer effect and lower toxicity due to modified drug release and particle shape. This trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lipo-MIT in ABC. Methods: This is a randomized, open label, active-controlled, single-center, phase II clinical trial. Eligible patients were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive Lipo-MIT or mitoxantrone hydrochloride injection (MIT) intravenously. The dosage was 20 mg/m2 for Lipo-MIT and 14 mg/m2 for MIT, once every four weeks (i.e., one treatment cycle). The primary endpoint was objective response rate(ORR). The secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: From Oct 2015 through Jul 2017, 60 patients were randomized to Lipo-MIT group (n = 30) or MIT group (n = 30). The Median (Q1,Q3) age was 56.0 (41.0,62.0) years in Lipo-MIT group and 54.5 (44.0,62.0) years in MIT group. Nineteen patients in Lipo-MIT group and 23 in MIT group received < 4 cycles of treatment, 11 patients in Lipo-MIT group and 7 in MIT group were treated for 4 or more cycles. When Lipo-MIT group was compared with MIT group, ORR was 13.3% (4/30) and 6.7% (2/30), disease control rate (PR+SD) was 50% (15/30) and 30% (9/30), median PFS was 2.30 (95% CI: 1.74-3.91) and 1.86 (95% CI: 1.74-2.40) months ( P> 0.05). Lipo-MIT showed significantly lower incidence of all-grade white blood cell decreased (86.7% vs 96.7%), neutrophil count decreased (80.0% vs 96.7%), conjugated bilirubin increased (53.3% vs 56.7%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (40.0% vs 53.3%), and troponin T increased (3.3% vs 36.7%) than MIT, but higher incidence of anemia (76.7% vs 46.7%), skin hyperpigmentation (66.7% vs 3.3%), and platelet count decreased (56.7% vs 53.3%) than MIT. Conclusions: Lipo-MIT provided numerically better ORR, DCR, and PFS than MIT in ABC. Lower incidence of troponin T increased might suggest lower cardiotoxicity of Lipo-MIT. It is worthwhile to further explore the clinical utility of Lipo-MIT in ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT02596373 .

A phase II trial of pembrolizumab and poly-ICLC in patients with metastatic mismatch repair-proficient colon cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15552-e15552
Author(s):  
Nabin Raj Karki ◽  
Kulsum Bano ◽  
Sadek Ramses ◽  
Asha Nayak
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response

e15552 Background: Single agent programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) inhibitor is ineffective against mismatch repair proficient (MMRp) colon cancer with response rates in single digits. Polyinosinic-Polycytidylic (Poly-ICLC) is a synthetic double stranded ribonucleic acid that generates inflammatory response increasing epitope recognition, develops tumor reactive T cells and induces interferon production which increases PD-L1 expression. In this trial, we test the effectiveness of combination of poly-ICLC and pembrolizumab in MMRp metastatic colon cancer. Methods: In this open label, single arm, single institution, phase 2 study, we enrolled 12 MMRp metastatic colon cancer patients from 1/25/2019 to 2/10/2021. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed MMRp metastatic colon cancer, ECOG 1-2 and progression on at least 2 lines of therapy. Treatment (Tx) consisted of Pembrolizumab (200 mg q3 weeks) and poly-ICLC (2 mg twice weekly, 3 days apart) for 1 year of treatment. Tx continued until progression, discontinuation or withdrawal. The primary endpoint was objective response rate by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints included duration of response, adverse event profiling, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Intention-to-treat analyses (ITT) included all patient receiving at least one dose of the study agent. Results: 12 patients with median age 68.5 years (range 54-75) and 33% (4/12) male had been enrolled till 2/10/2021. Objective response rate was 8.3% (1 patient had partial response). The duration of response was 196 days. Among these 12 patients, median PFS was 63.5 days and median OS was 196 days. Treatment related adverse events of any grade were reported in 12/12 (100%) patients with the most common toxicities being nausea, vomiting, anorexia, dehydration and dizziness. 3/12 (25%) had serious (grade ≥ 3) toxicities and one patient died after experiencing leukocytosis, dehydration and hyperbilirubinemia attributed to the trial drugs. Conclusions: Poly-ICLC was not effective in combination with pembrolizumab for MMRp metastatic colon cancer in 3rd line setting and it did not seem to improve response rates to immunotherapy. Novel strategies for stimulating immunogenicity of cold tumors are needed. Clinical trial information: NCT02834052.

Apatinib in combination with S-1 as first-line treatment in patients with advanced gastric cancer: A phase II clinical trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 71-71
Author(s):  
Chuantao Zhang ◽  
Zimin Liu ◽  
Na Zhou ◽  
Jianli Zhang ◽  
Jingjuan Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Advanced Gastric Cancer ◽  
Objective Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

71 Background: Apatinib is a standard therapy for advanced gastric cancer in third-line setting. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus S-1 as first-line therapy is unknown. Here, we conducted a single center study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of it. Methods: In this phase II trial, chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced gastric cancer were enrolled between August 24, 2016 and Sept 25, 2017, at a single centers in P.R. China. The patients enrolled were assigned to S-1 plus apatinib, S-1 (40 mg m-2 depending on patient's body surface area) was given orally, twice daily for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period, and apatinib 500 mg was given once daily, every 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was overall survival(OS). Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival(PFS), time to progress (TTP), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. On disease progression, patients had the option to receive single-agent apatinib every 3 weeks.This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02525237. Results: Thirty eligible patients, median age 63 years (range 40-76) and median performance status 1 (ECOG 0-2) ,were enrolled, 9 patients have no evaluation or withdrew consent. Therefore, of the 21 patients the median PFS and TTP were 5.34±1.83 months [1.76–8.92] and 1.34±0.08 months[1.18–1.51], respectively. Additionally, one(4.76%) patient had a complete response, one (4.76%)patients had partial responses, 11 patients had stable disease, and 9 patients had progress of disease. The objective response rate(ORR)and the disease control rate(DCR) were 9.52%(2/21) and 57.14%(12/21),respectively. Until Sept 25.2017,the primary endpoint(OS) had not been reached. We recorded grade 3 or 4 adverse events including elevated bilirubin and/or transaminase, fatigue, abdominal pain, thrombocytopenia,et al. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: First-line chemotherapy with S-1 plus apatinib in patients with advanced gastric cancer did not reach its primary objective. However, it holds promise of becoming a standard first-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT02525237.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document