Randomized, phase II study of ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in patients with pan-refractory, recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS6594-TPS6594
Author(s):  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Denise Roe ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Jessica Ruth Bauman ◽  
John M. Kaczmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Resistance Mechanism ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Resistance

TPS6594 Background: Patients with pan-refractory R/M HNSCC, with clinical resistance to cytotoxic therapy, anti-EGFR molecular targeting, and immunotherapy, have poor survival. An established tumor-intrinsic resistance mechanism to cetuximab, an anti-EGFR IgG1 monoclonal antibody (mAb), is activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathway, which converges with the EGFR network at both the PI3K/Akt and MAPK nodes allowing for reciprocal compensation. Moreover, over-expression of HGF in the tumor microenvironment is immunosuppressive. Convergent data suggest that HGF/cMet pathway inhibition concurrent with EGFR blockade may overcome cetuximab resistance. We previously reported a Phase I study of ficlatuzumab, a humanized anti-HGF IgG1 mAb, with cetuximab in cetuximab-resistant R/M HNSCC. The combination showed promising safety, overall response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Preliminary biomarker analyses showed that high circulating cMet was associated with poor PFS whereas serum Veristrat, a proteomic classifier associated with worse prognosis in the setting of anti-EGFR monotherapy, was not. An increase in total peripheral T cells, particularly the CD8+ subset, was associated with treatment response while progression was associated with expansion of a unique myeloid population. We designed a follow-on randomized phase II trial evaluating ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in pan-refractory, R/M HNSCC with signaling and immune correlatives. Methods: This is a multicenter phase II trial with a randomized, non-comparative, two-arm design (ficlatuzumab 20 mg/kg with or without cetuximab 500 mg/m2 every 2 weeks) in patients with pan-refractory R/M HNSCC. Key eligibility criteria include: R/M HNSCC; cetuximab resistance (progression during or within 6 months of cetuximab-radiation or palliative cetuximab); platinum resistance; prior exposure to anti-PD1 mAb; ECOG 0-1; consent to baseline research biopsy. The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy of each arm as measured by PFS. To test the hypothesis that either regimen improves historical PFS from 2 to 3.33 months requires 66 eligible patients. Key secondary endpoints are ORR and survival. Mechanistic biomarkers include tumor HGF/cMet pathway activation, tumor and peripheral immune profiles, soluble cMet, and serum Veristrat. Thirty-five of 66 subjects have enrolled at 6 centers. A Bayesian continuous monitoring rule for futility has not been triggered for either arm. Clinical trial information: NCT03422536 .

Randomized phase II study of vandetanib (VAN) alone or in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7544-7544 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Heymach ◽  
L. Paz-Ares ◽  
F. De Braud ◽  
M. Sebastian ◽  
D. J. Stewart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Circulating Endothelial Cells ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Biomarker Analysis

7544 Background: VAN (ZD6474) is a once-daily oral agent that selectively inhibits VEGFR, EGFR and RET signaling. This randomized phase II trial investigated VAN alone or in combination with CP vs CP. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic (IIIB-IV) NSCLC. The primary objective was to determine whether VAN (300 mg/day) ± CP (C, target AUCss = 6 mg/ml·min; P; 200 mg/m2 iv) prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) vs CP (75% power to detect 30% prolongation; 1-sided P=0.2). An initial run-in phase had established VAN 300 mg/day as an appropriate dose to be given with CP. Results: A total of 181 pts (median age 61 yrs, range 27–83) received VAN (n=73), VAN + CP (n=56) or CP (n=52). The primary objective was met, with VAN + CP prolonging PFS vs CP (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.50–1.15; P=0.098): median PFS = 24 wks (VAN + CP) and 23 wks (CP). The VAN monotherapy arm was stopped early after a planned interim PFS analysis met the criterion for discontinuation (HR > 1.33 vs CP). The objective response rates were 32%, 25% and 7% for VAN + CP, CP and VAN, respectively. Overall survival (OS), a secondary endpoint, was not significantly different between pts receiving VAN + CP or CP (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.63–1.81; P=0.595). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggest advantages in PFS and OS for VAN + CP vs CP for the 56 female pts. There was a higher incidence of some adverse events with VAN + CP vs CP, including rash (64% vs 33%), diarrhea (53% vs 32%), asymptomatic QTc-related events (22% vs 4%) and hypertension (32% vs 4%). Pts receiving VAN + CP, including 7 who entered with CNS metastases and 11 with squamous histology, did not experience any intracranial bleeding, or hemoptysis of CTC grade 2 or higher. A biomarker analysis, including circulating endothelial cells and 35 plasma angiogenic factors and cytokines, suggests several potential markers predictive of clinical outcome and will be reported separately. Conclusions: In this randomized phase II trial of 1st-line advanced NSCLC, VAN + CP met the primary endpoint of prolonging PFS vs CP alone but did not provide a detectable survival advantage. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

PRECEDENT: A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Vintafolide (EC145) and Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin (PLD) in Combination Versus PLD Alone in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (35) ◽  
pp. 4400-4406 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Wendel Naumann ◽  
Robert L. Coleman ◽  
Robert A. Burger ◽  
Edward A. Sausville ◽  
Elzbieta Kutarska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Folate Receptor ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii

Purpose Vintafolide (EC145) is a folic acid–desacetylvinblastine conjugate that binds to the folate receptor (FR), which is expressed on the majority of epithelial ovarian cancers. This randomized phase II trial evaluated vintafolide combined with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) compared with PLD alone. The utility of an FR-targeted imaging agent, 99mTc-etarfolatide (EC20), in selecting patients likely to benefit from vintafolide was also examined. Patients and Methods Women with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer who had undergone ≤ two prior cytotoxic regimens were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio to PLD (50 mg/m2 intravenously [IV] once every 28 days) with or without vintafolide (2.5 mg IV three times per week during weeks 1 and 3). Etarfolatide scanning was optional. The primary objective was to compare progression-free survival (PFS) between the groups. Results The intent-to-treat population comprised 149 patients. Median PFS was 5.0 and 2.7 months for the vintafolide plus PLD and PLD-alone arms, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.96; P = .031). The greatest benefit was observed in patients with 100% of lesions positive for FR, with median PFS of 5.5 compared with 1.5 months for PLD alone (HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.85; P = .013). The group of patients with FR-positive disease (10% to 90%) experienced some PFS improvement (HR, 0.873), whereas patients with disease that did not express FR experienced no PFS benefit (HR, 1.806). Conclusion Vintafolide plus PLD is the first combination to demonstrate an improvement over standard therapy in a randomized trial of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. Etarfolatide can identify patients likely to benefit from vintafolide.

Paclitaxel Given Once Per Week With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Angiosarcoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (25) ◽  
pp. 2797-2802 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isabelle L. Ray-Coquard ◽  
Julien Domont ◽  
Emmanuelle Tresch-Bruneel ◽  
Emmanuelle Bompas ◽  
Philippe A. Cassier ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Clinical Investigation ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Radiation Induced

Purpose The aim of this randomized, phase II trial was to explore the activity and safety of adding bevacizumab to paclitaxel once per week in treatment of angiosarcomas (AS). Methods Patients were treated with paclitaxel alone (90 mg/m2 per week for six cycles of 28 days each; arm A) or with paclitaxel combined with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks; arm B). In the combination treatment arm, bevacizumab was administered after the six cycles of chemotherapy as maintenance therapy (15 mg/kg once every 3 weeks) until intolerance or progression occurred. Stratification factors were superficial versus visceral AS and de novo versus radiation-induced AS. The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate, which was based on RECIST, version 1.1. Statistical assumptions were P0 = 20%, P1 = 40%, a = 10%, and b = 20%. P0 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining inactive drug, and P1 was the PFS rate at 6 months defining promising drug. Results A total of 52 patients were enrolled, and 50 were randomly assigned in 14 centers. The most common primary sites were the breast (49%) and skin (12%). There were 17 (34%) visceral and 24 (49%) radiation-induced AS. The performance status was 0 in 24 patients (49%) and 1 in the remaining 25 patients (51%). The median follow-up time was 14.5 months. Both treatment regimens were considered active, with 6-month PFS rates of 54% (14 of 26) in arm A and 57% (14 of 24) in arm B. The median overall survival rates were 19.5 months in arm A and 15.9 months in arm B. Toxicity was higher with the combination arm and included one fatal drug-related toxicity (intestinal occlusion). Conclusion The primary objective was met in both treatment arms. However, the present data do not support additional clinical investigation of combined paclitaxel/bevacizumab for the treatment of advanced AS.

Randomized phase II trial of ficlatuzumab with or without cetuximab in pan-refractory, advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6015-6015
Author(s):  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
Nabil F. Saba ◽  
Denise Roe ◽  
Jessica R. Bauman ◽  
John M. Kaczmar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Platinum Resistance ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Hpv Status

6015 Background: Cetuximab (C), an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), is approved for advanced HNSCC but benefits a minority. Crosstalk between the EGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathways is a known resistance mechanism. HGF is also immunosuppressive within the tumor microenvironment. A Phase I study confirmed the safety of C and ficlatuzumab (F), an IgG1 anti-HGF mAb, with preliminary efficacy and biomarker data suggesting that dual pathway inhibition may overcome tumor-intrinsic or immune cetuximab resistance. Methods: The primary objective of this phase II randomized, non-comparative trial was to evaluate the efficacy of F (20 mg/kg every 2 wks), with or without C (500 mg/m2 every 2 wks), in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC. Eligibility criteria included recurrent/metastatic HNSCC, performance status (PS) 0-1, C resistance (defined as progression on or within 6 months of exposure), and resistance to or ineligibility for platinum and anti-PD1 mAb. Randomization was stratified by HPV status and center. The primary endpoint was median progression-free survival (mPFS). An arm was deemed worthy of further study if the lower bound of the 90% 1-sided confidence interval (CI) excluded the historical control of 2 months. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) in the overall and HPV-stratified populations. A Bayesian continuous monitoring rule for futility was applied. Results: 60 patients were randomized and 58 treated between Jan 2018 and Dec 2020 (27 to F; 33 to FC). Baseline characteristics were balanced across major prognostic variables including age, PS, HPV status, platinum resistance, and PD1 mAb exposure. Median time since prior cetuximab was 3.5 months (range 0-48 months). Grade ≥3 adverse events attributed to F included: pneumonitis (2); edema (3); diarrhea (1); LFT elevation (1); rash (2); electrolyte abnormality (2). The Table presents efficacy data. The F arm stopped for futility after 26 evaluable subjects accrued. The FC arm completed accrual and met the primary endpoint; 32 evaluable subjects had mPFS of 3.6 months (lower bound 90% 1-sided CI: 2.3 months) and ORR of 19% (6/32). All responses were in HPV- subjects, including 2 complete (CR) and 4 partial responses (PR) to the FC combination and 1 PR to F monotherapy. The mPFS and ORR for the HPV- population (n = 16) on FC were 3.8 months and 38% (6/16). Mechanistic signaling and immune biomarkers are under analysis. Conclusions: The well-tolerated FC combination met the primary PFS endpoint in pan-refractory, advanced HNSCC with notable activity in HPV- HNSCC, warranting phase III investigation. Clinical trial information: NCT03422536. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Ficlatuzumab and Cetuximab in Cetuximab-Resistant, Recurrent/Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie E. Bauman ◽  
James Ohr ◽  
William E. Gooding ◽  
Robert L. Ferris ◽  
Umamaheswar Duvvuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Resistance Mechanism ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Intrinsic Resistance ◽  
Immune Biomarkers ◽  
Pathway Inhibition ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose

Cetuximab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), is approved for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) but benefits a minority. An established tumor-intrinsic resistance mechanism is cross-talk between the EGFR and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/cMet pathways. Dual pathway inhibition may overcome cetuximab resistance. This Phase I study evaluated the combination of cetuximab and ficlatuzumab, an anti-HGF mAb, in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. The primary objective was to establish the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Mechanistic tumor-intrinsic and immune biomarkers were explored. Thirteen patients enrolled with no dose-limiting toxicities observed at any dose tier. Three evaluable patients were treated at Tier 1 and nine at Tier 2, which was determined to be the RP2D (cetuximab 500 mg/m2 and ficlatuzumab 20 mg/kg every 2 weeks). Median PFS and OS were 5.4 (90% CI = 1.9–11.4) and 8.9 (90% CI = 2.7–15.2) months, respectively, with a confirmed ORR of 2 of 12 (17%; 90% CI = 6–40%). High circulating soluble cMet levels correlated with poor survival. An increase in peripheral T cells, particularly the CD8+ subset, was associated with treatment response whereas progression was associated with expansion of a distinct myeloid population. This well-tolerated combination demonstrated promising activity in cetuximab-resistant, advanced HNSCC.

Randomized phase II trial of the multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib versus interferon (IFN) in treatment-naïve patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4501-4501 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. Escudier ◽  
C. Szczylik ◽  
T. Demkow ◽  
M. Staehler ◽  
F. Rolland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Grade 3

4501 Background: Sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor that targets tumor growth and vascularization, significantly prolonged PFS in a Phase III trial with previously treated mRCC patients. This randomized Phase II trial investigated the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib compared with IFN in first-line therapy of patients with clear-cell RCC. Methods: Untreated patients with mRCC were stratified by MSKCC prognostic score and randomized to receive continuous oral sorafenib 400 mg bid or IFN 9 million units tiw, with an option of dose escalation (600 mg bid sorafenib) or crossover from IFN to sorafenib upon disease progression. The study assessed PFS at 99 events as primary objective, best response (RECIST), overall survival, health-related quality of life, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Baseline characteristics of 188 patients (sorafenib n=97; IFN n = 91) were: median age 62.0 years; MSKCC score: 57% low, 41% intermediate, 1% high; prior nephrectomy: 82%; ECOG 0:1, 55.3%:44.7%. As of January 6, 2006, PFS events have been reported for 64 (34%) patients. Preliminary data showed drug-related AEs of any severity (sorafenib vs IFN) in 50.5% vs 51.6% of patients (≥grade 3: 8.2% vs 11.0%), including diarrhea (24.7% vs 5.5%), fatigue (14.4% vs 20.9%), fever (2.1% vs 18.7%), hypertension (13.4% vs 0%), nausea (5.2% vs 13.2%), flu-like syndrome (1.0% vs 6.6%), hand-foot skin reaction (6.2% vs 0%), and rash/desquamation (4.1% vs 0%). Drug-related metabolic/laboratory abnormalities at grade 3 (no grade 4) comprised hypophosphatemia (21.7% vs. 0%), lipase elevation (5.6% vs. 11.1%), anemia (0% vs. 5.3%) and hypoalbuminemia (0% vs. 3.6%). Five patients receiving IFN withdrew from treatment due to AEs, whereas only one patient withdrew from sorafenib. Conclusions: Sorafenib was generally well tolerated in RCC patients in the first-line setting, with relatively infrequent drug-related AEs ≥grade 3. Full PFS data will be presented at the meeting. [Table: see text]

A randomized phase II trial of weekly docetaxel plus either cisplatin or oxaliplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced gastric cancer: Preliminary results

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4566-4566
Author(s):  
S. Sym ◽  
S. Park ◽  
J. Park ◽  
K. Kwon ◽  
I. Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Preliminary Results ◽  
Weekly Docetaxel ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Significant Difference

4566 Background: Docetaxel, in combination with cisplatin or oxaliplatin, has demonstrated efficacy against AGC. This randomized phase II trial evaluated two weekly docetaxel-based regimens to see which would be most promising according to objective response rate (ORR) as first-line therapy in AGC. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma and a performance status ≤2 were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (35 mg/m2) weekly on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle plus either cisplatin (60 mg/m2 on day 1) (arm A) or oxaliplatin (120 mg/m2 on day 1) (arm B). Toxicity was assessed on days 1, 8, and 21 of each cycle, and response was evaluated every 2 cycles. Results: Between March 2007 and December 2008, 61 eligible patients entered. In Arm A, 29 patients were evaluable for objective response and 31 for safety. In Arm B, 28 patients were evaluable for objective response and 30 for safety. Median age was 52 years and disease status was comparable for both arms. Ten of 29 (34.5%) patients had a confirmed objective response in the arm A (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.1–51.8%) and 11 of 28 (39.2%) patients had a confirmed objective response in the arm B (95% CI 21.1- 57.2%). No significant difference was noted between the arms both for ORR (p=0.202) or for disease control (58.6% and 82.1%, respectively, p=0.082). Median progression free survival time was 4.4 month in the arm A and 4.3 months in the arm B (Hazard ratio = 0.936; 95% CI, 0.503–1.744; p = 0.836). There was no relevant difference in the occurrence of overall grade ¾ toxicity between the two arms (51.6% vs. 46.6%, respectively; p=0.800). Neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 toxicity (32.3% vs. 36.6%, respectively). There was one treatment related death in Arm B. Conclusions: The preliminary results showed that both treatment arms have similar clinical efficacy as front-line treatment in AGC. Each regimen has a manageable tolerability profile. The accrual is ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A randomized phase II trial comparing two doses of lenalidomide for the treatment of stage IV ocular melanoma

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e20012-e20012 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Zeldis ◽  
C. Heller ◽  
G. Seidel ◽  
N. Yuldasheva ◽  
D. Stirling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Ocular Melanoma ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Animal Data ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3

e20012 Background: Ocular melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults with an incidence of 4.3 new cases per million. Approximately 50% of patients will develop metastases and the mean survival of those with liver metastases is 8–10 months. There are no effective systemic therapies. Pre-clinical studies of the antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory agent, lenalidomide, have shown promise in animal models of human ocular melanoma. We therefore conducted a phase II trial comparing two doses of oral lenalidomide. Methods: Patients with stage IV ocular melanoma, who met eligibility criteria and demonstrated disease progression, were enrolled on an IRB approved prospective random assignment trial comparing 5 mg and 25 mg of lenalidomide administered once a day orally for 21 days with a 7 day recovery (one cycle). Lesions were measured at baseline and every 3 months and scored for response by RECIST criteria. Patients who completed 3 cycles were eligible for response evaluation. Patients with responding lesions or with stable disease could continue receiving the agent. Toxicity was assessed using the NCI Common Toxicity Criteria. Results: Seventeen patients (13 female, 4 male; mean age 53) met eligibility criteria and were randomized to 5 mg (9 patients) or 25 mg (8 patients) of lenalidomide. The agent was well tolerated at both doses with only three grade 3 toxicities (two decreased ANC and one rash/puritis) requiring dose adjustments. Sixteen patients were eligible for response assessments. Nine patients had progressive disease by RECIST criteria following 3 cycles of therapy. Seven patients (44%) had stable disease for a mean of 7 months (range 6–12 months). There were no RECIST defined responders. There were no differences between the two dose groups with respect to toxicity or disease stabilization. Conclusions: Lenalidomide is well tolerated at doses of 5 mg and 25 mg orally for a 21 day cycle by patients with stage IV ocular melanoma. While no responses were seen, disease stabilization for a mean of 7 months was seen in 44% of patients. This effect was consistent with the pre-clinical animal data. Based on these results, further development of lenalidomide in combination with other agents should be considered for the treatment of metastatic ocular melanoma. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of anti-transforming growth factor-beta (TGFß) monoclonal antibody GC1008 in relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7077-7077 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Stevenson ◽  
Hedy Lee Kindler ◽  
Daniel Schwed ◽  
Anjana Ranganathan ◽  
Mona Jacobs-Small ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor Beta ◽  
Transforming Growth Factor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Modified Recist

7077 Background: TGFβ is a pleiotropic cytokine overexpressed by MPM. Based on preclinical data documenting a key role for TGFβ in promoting growth and progression of MPM, we are conducting a phase II trial of GC1008 in patients (pts) with progressive MPM. Methods: Pts with progressive MPM by modified RECIST criteria and PS 0-1 with 1-2 prior systemic therapies (at least 1 pemetrexed-based) are eligible. Treatment plan: GC1008 3mg/kg IV over 90 minutes every 21 days. Responses are assessed by modified RECIST every 6 weeks. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 3 months; secondary objectives include safety with GC1008, response rate by modified RECIST, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Results: The modified Gehan stage 1 stopping criterion of 1/13 pts with 3 month PFS has been exceeded. To date, 13 pts (10 PS 0; 3 PS 1) with MPM (median age 69; 2F, 11M; 11 epithelial, 1 sarcomatoid, 1 biphasic) enrolled. Treatment-related toxicities include G1/2 fatigue (3 pts), nausea (1 pt) and xerosis (1 pt). Other adverse events possibly related to GC1008 were rapid disease progression in 1 pt after 2 cycles, and G2 skin keratoacanthoma in 1 pt after 5 cycles. Three pts met the primary objective of 3 month PFS at 4.1, 4.2 and 9 months each. Stable disease (SD) was seen in 3 pts (23%). Median TTP is 1.4 months (95% CI 1.2-∞); median OS is 13 months (95% CI 6-∞). Increased serum mesothelin levels have closely tracked disease progression. Serum from 6/13 pts showed new antibodies against MPM tumor lysates as measured by immunoblotting. Two of 3 pts with SD had anti-tumor antibody responses. Mean baseline plasma level of TGFβ was 2447 pg/ml but did not correlate with baseline plasma TGFβ or TTP. Conclusions: GC1008 was well tolerated in pretreated MPM patients. SD occurred in 3 pts, all with prior disease progression. Evidence for humoral anti-tumor immunity was seen in nearly half of enrollees and in 2 of 3 pts with SD. OS compares favorably to prior single-agent studies in pretreated MPM.

SPIRITT (study 20060141): A randomized phase II study of FOLFIRI with either panitumumab (pmab) or bevacizumab (bev) as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with wild-type (WT) KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 454-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Randolph Hecht ◽  
Allen Lee Cohn ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
Mansoor N. Saleh ◽  
Bilal Piperdi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Randomized Phase Ii ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Previously Treated

454 Background: Pmab has demonstrated significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in pts with WT KRAS mCRC as 2nd-line tx in a phase III trial comparing pmab + FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone. Here, we describe the results of SPIRITT, a multicenter, randomized phase II study evaluating pmab + FOLFIRI and bev + FOLFIRI in pts with WT KRAS mCRC previously treated with a 1st-line bev + oxaliplatin (Ox)-based chemotherapy regimen. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to pmab 6.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W or to bev 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg + FOLFIRI Q2W. Eligibility criteria included: WT KRAS mCRC, ECOG ≤ 1, no prior irinotecan or anti-EGFR tx, and tx failure of prior 1st-line bev + Ox-based therapy (≥ 4 cycles). The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. No formal hypothesis was tested. Results: 182 pts with WT KRAS mCRC were randomized. All pts received tx. Efficacy results are shown (table). Worst grade of 3/4 adverse events (AE) occurred in 78% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 65% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Grade 5 AEs occurred in 7% of pts in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 7% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Tx discontinuation due to any AE was 29% in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm and 25% in the bev + FOLFIRI arm. Conclusions: In this estimation study of pts with WT KRAS mCRC that previously received bev + Ox-based tx, the PFS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI: 0.68 - 1.50). The OS HR was 1.06 (95% CI: 0.75 - 1.49). The observed ORR was higher in the pmab + FOLFIRI arm. 54% of bev + FOLFIRI pts received subsequent anti-EGFR tx. The safety profile for both arms was similar to previously reported studies. Tx discontinuation rates due to AEs were similar between the arms. Clinical trial information: NCT00418938. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document