A population-based study of acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis in the United States: 2004 to 2015.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19003-e19003
Author(s):  
Nicole McLaughlin ◽  
Gordon Ruan ◽  
Courtney N. Day ◽  
William S. Harmsen ◽  
Caleb J. Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
The United States ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Univariable Analysis ◽  
Adjusted Analysis ◽  
Male Sex

e19003 Background: Acute panmyelosis with myelofibrosis (APMF) is a rare subtype of acute myeloid leukemia characterized by acute panmyeloid proliferation with increased blasts, cytopenias with bone marrow fibrosis, and absence of splenomegaly. There is a paucity of population-based studies of APMF. Methods: We queried the United States Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and National Cancer Database (NCDB) using the ICD-O-3 code 9931/3. The SEER 17 registries (2004-2015) were used to find data on incidence. For NCDB data, comorbid disease burden was calculated using the Charlson-Deyo Score (CDS). Hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method. Variables significant in univariable analysis were included in a multivariable analysis. Results: We identified 260 APMF patients using the SEER database. Incidence was 0.3 cases/million individuals and did not change significantly from 2004-2015. With a median follow up of 6.9 years (95% CI 6.1-7.8), the median OS was 2.3 years (95% CI 1.7-2.8). We identified 530 APMF patients using the NCDB. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years (range 22-90) and 311 (59%) were male. With a median follow up of 5.0 years (95% CI 3.0-7.6), the median OS was 2.3 years (95% CI: 0.8-6.5). OS was 69%, 31%, and 18% at 1-, 5-, and 10- years, respectively. Patients diagnosed in 2012-2015 had a significantly improved OS compared to those diagnosed in 2004-2007 (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.49-0.85; p=0.002). 271 patients (53%) patients received chemotherapy. The OS for those that received chemotherapy was 70% at 1 year and 30% at 5 years versus 70% and 32% at 1- and 5- years for those who did not ( p=0.99). The median time to chemotherapy from time of diagnosis was 25 days (range 0-532 days). 52 patients (10%) underwent transplantation and the OS of those patients was 90% at 1 year and 45% at 5 years versus 67% and 29% at 1- and 5- years for those who did not (HR: 1.7 (95% CI: 1.2-2.6), p=0.006). In univariable analysis, factors predicting inferior OS were age ≥ 65 years old at diagnosis (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.5-2.3; p<0.001), male sex (HR 1.5, 95% CI 1.2-1.8; p<0.001), CDS ≥ 1 (HR: 1.5 (95% CI: 1.2-2.0), p<0.001), government insurance (HR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.3; p<0.001), diagnosis at a non-academic facility (HR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.0, p<0.001), and not receiving a hematologic transplant (HR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2-2.6; p=0.006). Multivariable-adjusted analysis is shown in the Table. Conclusions: The overall incidence of APMF has not changed between 2004 and 2015, but OS for 2012-2015 was improved compared to 2004-2007. Age ≥ 65 years old, male sex, CDS ≥ 1, and diagnosis at a nonacademic facility predicted inferior OS. Multivariable-adjusted analysis.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Incidence, Clinical Features, and Outcomes of Langerhans Cell Sarcoma in the United States

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3031-3031
Author(s):  
Anuhya Kommalapati ◽  
Sri Harsha Tella ◽  
Ronald S. Go ◽  
Gaurav Goyal
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Clinical Presentation ◽  
The United States ◽  
Langerhans Cell ◽  
Seer Database ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Cell Sarcoma ◽  
Langerhans Cell Sarcoma

Abstract Background: Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS) is a rare malignant neoplasm of Langerhans cells characterized by multi-organ involvement and an aggressive clinical course.Given the rarity of the disease, the true epidemiological data on LCS are lacking, and most of our knowledge is obtained from institutional case series. In this study, we utilized two national databases- the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program database (https://seer.cancer.gov/) and National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to study the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcomes of LCS. Methods: We calculated LCS incidence (cases/10, 000, 000 individuals) from SEER database using SEER*Stat (v 8.3.4; https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/) statistical software. SEER is a population-based registry program of the United States National Cancer Institute that covers approximately 28% of the population. We identified LCS cases that were confirmed histologically using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology edition 3 (ICD-0-3) histology code 9756/3 from SEER 18 (2000-2014) registry. As the disease was mandatory reportable only after 2001, we included cases that were diagnosed after 2001 in the analysis. Demographic patterns, clinical presentation, and overall survival (OS) were calculated utilizing the patient level data from the NCDB Participant User File. NCDB is a joint program by the American College of Surgeons and American Cancer Society that represents approximately 70% of newly diagnosed cancer cases in the nation. All patients aged > 18 years with a diagnosis LCS (ICD-0-3 Code 9756/3) from 2004 to 2015 were included. To ensure accuracy of follow-up, we excluded the patients that were not treated at the same facility of diagnosis from survival analysis. Results: A total of 25 cases of LCS were reported to SEER between 2000 and 2014. The overall incidence of the disease was 0.2 per 10,000,000 [95% CI:0.1-0.3] and was similar among males and females (p=0.33). The incidence of the disease did not differ significantly among different races (whites, blacks and other races) (p=0.56). Between 2004 and 2015, 52 patients with newly diagnosed LCS were identified from NCDB and 60% were males. The median age of diagnosis was 62 (range, 19-90 years). The most common sites of the presentation were connective tissue (29%; n=15), reticuloendothelial system (RES) and hematopoietic system (25%; n=13), skin (19%, n=10), gastrointestinal (10%, n=5), bones and joints (8%, n=4), brain (2%, n=1) and breast (2%, n=1). Site specific details were missing in 27% (n=14) of cases. Out of the 52 patients, twenty patients (39%) received chemotherapy as first-line therapy, while 24 (46%) received surgery and 15 (29%) received radiation therapy. After a median follow up of 18 (range, 1-144) months, 27 patients (52%) had died. The one- year survival rate was 62%, and the median OS was 19 months (Fig. 1A). We also calculated the 1-year disease-specific survival and OS using SEER database, and was 74% and 63%, respectively. After censoring the patients with hematopoietic and RES involvement, the patients who were managed with radiation therapy (median dose 3960 cGy, range 750-6400) had a better OS as compared to those who received no radiation therapy (p=0.03, Fig. 1B). On the contrary, after excluding the patients with hematopoietic and RES as primary site, no significant difference in OS was noted between the patients who were managed with and without surgery (17 vs 21 months; p = 0.75; Fig. 1C). In addition, post-surgical radiation or chemotherapy had no significant benefit in median OS (p=0.25). Among patients with hematopoietic and RES involvement, there was no association between OS and receipt of chemotherapy (p = 0.16; Fig. 1D); however, the number of patients who received chemotherapy was small (n=6). Conclusion: This dual-national registry study shows that LCS is extremely rare, and has a poor prognosis. Although the data regarding optimal management of LCS are limited, our study demonstrates that radiation therapy may offer survival advantage in patients without hematopoietic and RES involvement. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Natural History and Evolution of Anti-Interferon-γ Autoantibody-Associated Immunodeficiency Syndrome in Thailand and the United States

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria H Hong ◽  
Ana M Ortega-Villa ◽  
Sally Hunsberger ◽  
Ploenchan Chetchotisakd ◽  
Siriluck Anunnatsiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Natural History ◽  
The United States ◽  
Interferon Γ ◽  
Mycobacterium Abscessus ◽  
Annual Data ◽  
Persistent Infections ◽  
Ifn Γ ◽  
Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Abstract Background The natural history of anti-interferon-γ (IFN-γ) autoantibody-associated immunodeficiency syndrome is not well understood. Methods Data of 74 patients with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies at Srinagarind Hospital, Thailand, were collected annually (median follow-up duration, 7.5 years). Annual data for 19 patients and initial data for 4 patients with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies at the US National Institutes of Health were collected (median follow-up duration, 4.5 years). Anti-IFN-γ autoantibody levels were measured in plasma samples. Results Ninety-one percent of US patients were of Southeast Asian descent; there was a stronger female predominance (91%) in US than Thai (64%) patients. Mycobacterium abscessus (34%) and Mycobacterium avium complex (83%) were the most common nontuberculous mycobacteria in Thailand and the United States, respectively. Skin infections were more common in Thailand (P = .001), whereas bone (P &lt; .0001), lung (P = .002), and central nervous system (P = .03) infections were more common in the United States. Twenty-four percent of Thai patients died, most from infections. None of the 19 US patients with follow-up data died. Anti-IFN-γ autoantibody levels decreased over time in Thailand (P &lt; .001) and the United States (P = .017), with either cyclophosphamide (P = .01) or rituximab therapy (P = .001). Conclusions Patients with anti-IFN-γ autoantibodies in Thailand and the United States had distinct demographic and clinical features. While titers generally decreased with time, anti-IFN-γ autoantibody disease had a chronic clinical course with persistent infections and death. Close long-term surveillance for new infections is recommended.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document