An unmatched case-control study evaluating the relationship between cancer diagnosis and drinking water source on the lower Eastern Shore of Maryland.
e22514 Background: The lower Eastern Shore of Maryland is an agricultural and rural region with high cancer rates. Prior research has suggested that cancer patients on the lower Eastern Shore of Maryland rely on residential private well water more than municipal water, and that cancer patients rely on residential private well water more than individuals in the general county population. The purpose of this unmatched case-control study was to further clarify the relationship between cancer diagnosis and residential private well water use. Methods: A water consumption survey was provided to new hematology/oncology clinic patients seen at a regional hospital on the lower Eastern Shore from October 2020 through February 2021. Participants were asked their age, county of residence, residential water source, daily tap water consumption, presence of a water filtration system, and current or prior cancer history. A case was defined as an individual using residential private well water, and a control was defined as an individual using municipal water. Fisher’s exact test and binominal logistic regression were used to evaluate the relationship between residential water source and cancer history. Results: 334 patients were surveyed and 270 were included in analysis, with 133 cases and 137 controls. Median age of cases was 64 years (SD ± 16.6) and median age of controls was 62 years (SD ± 16.87). Our study found that compared to individuals utilizing municipal water, individuals utilizing residential private well water were more likely to live in their homes for > 5 years (61% vs. 46%, p = 0.015), drink tap water (61% vs. 41%, p = 0.015), and utilize a water filtration system (31% vs. 16%, p = 0.006). Controlling for age, subjects who reported drinking at least two glasses of unfiltered private well water per day were more likely to have a current or prior cancer diagnosis compared to individuals relying on municipal water (OR = 2.57; 95% CI: 1.07-6.12, p = 0.03). Among subjects who drank less than 2 glasses of tap water per day or utilized a water filtration system, there was no difference in cancer history between individuals utilizing private well water versus municipal water. There were no relationships between county of residency, length of home residency, and cancer diagnosis. Conclusions: Individuals on the lower Eastern Shore of Maryland who consume at least 2 glasses of private well water without a water filtration system were more likely to indicate a current or prior cancer history compared to individuals consuming at least 2 glasses of municipal water. Interpretation is limited by small sample size and lack of causality, however, the results signal a need for additional studies evaluating well water use and cancer risk in this region.