scholarly journals Relationship Between Fasting Plasma Glucagon Level and Renal Function—A Cross-Sectional Study in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian-Jun Liu ◽  
Sylvia Liu ◽  
Resham L Gurung ◽  
Clara Chan ◽  
Keven Ang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aim The kidney is the main site for glucagon clearance. However, a recent study showed that hyperglucagonemia in patients with end-stage renal disease might not be caused by full-length intact glucagon. Additionally, the relationship between glucagon and renal function in early-stage chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not yet been characterized. We studied the association of fasting glucagon with renal function across a wide range of glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) in participants with type 2 diabetes. Participants and Methods 326 participants with type 2 diabetes and renal function spanning CKD stage 1 to 5 were included in the present cross-sectional study. Fasting full-length plasma glucagon was quantified using a newly developed ELISA (Mercodia AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Results The fasting plasma glucagon level was elevated linearly from CKD stage 1 to 5 [from a median of 2.5 pM (interquartile range, 1.4 to 4.7) in CKD 1 to a median of 8.3 pM (interquartile range, 5.9 to 12.8) in CKD 5; P for trend < 0.0001], from as early as CKD stage 2 compared with that in stage 1 (Bonferroni-corrected P < 0.0001). The estimated GFR and homeostatic model of assessment–insulin resistance were the main determinants of the fasting glucagon level. These explained 14.3% and 10.3% of the glucagon variance, respectively. Albuminuria was not associated with fasting glucagon after adjustment for estimated GFR. Conclusions Fasting full-length glucagon was elevated linearly with the deterioration in renal function in individuals with type 2 diabetes, even in those with early CKD. In addition to renal function, insulin sensitivity was also a main determinant of glucagon variance.

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. e025125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iliza Idris ◽  
Hizlinda Tohid ◽  
Noor Azimah Muhammad ◽  
Mohd Radzniwan A Rashid ◽  
Azainorsuzila Mohd Ahad ◽  
...  

ObjectivesThis study aimed to determine the prevalence of anaemia among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) at primary care settings and its associated factors.Design, setting and participantsThis cross-sectional study involved 808 adult patients with T2DM and CKD who were recruited via systematic sampling from 20 public primary care clinics in Peninsular Malaysia. Their sociodemographic, clinical and biomedical profiles were collected through interviews, examination of medical records and blood testing.ResultsThe prevalence of anaemia was 31.7% (256/808). The anaemia was mainly mild (61.5%) and normocytic normochromic (58.7%). About 88.7% of the patients with anaemia were not known to have anaemia prior to the study. Among 36 patients with documented history of anaemia, 80.6% were still anaemic, and only a half received iron therapy. Multivariate regression analysis showed that women (adjusted odd ratio (AOR): 1.57, 95% CI: 1.12 to 2.21, p=0.009) and those with older age (AOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.06, p<0.001), CKD stage 3a (AOR: 2.47; 95% CI: 1.25 to 4.87, p=0.009), CKD stage 3b (AOR: 4.36; 95% CI: 2.14 to 8.85, p<0.001), CKD stage 4 (AOR: 10.12; 95% CI: 4.36 to 23.47, p<0.001), CKD stage 5 (AOR: 10.80; 95% CI: 3.32 to 35.11, p<0.001) and foot complication (AOR 3.12, 95% CI: 1.51 to 6.46, p=0.002) were more likely to have anaemia. Having higher body mass index (AOR 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92 to 0.99, p=0.012) and higher diastolic blood pressure (AOR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95 to 0.99, p<0.001) were associated with lower odds to have anaemia.ConclusionAnaemia among patients with T2DM and CKD in primary care was common, and the majority was unrecognised. Inadequate treatment of anaemia was also prevalent. Therefore, screening of anaemia should be incorporated into the routine assessment of diabetic complications particularly for those with significant associated factors. It is hoped that such strategy could lead to early treatment and hence improve their overall care.Trial registration numberNMRR-15-660-24324.


2018 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 46-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wisit Kaewput ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Ram Rangsin ◽  
Michael A. Mao ◽  
Bancha Satirapoj ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 33-43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wisit Kaewput ◽  
Charat Thongprayoon ◽  
Ram Rangsin ◽  
Prajej Ruangkanchanasetr ◽  
Michael A Mao ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2393-PUB
Author(s):  
KENICHIRO TAKAHASHI ◽  
MINORI SHINODA ◽  
RIKA SAKAMOTO ◽  
JUN SUZUKI ◽  
TADASHI YAMAKAWA ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 910-P
Author(s):  
YO KOHATA ◽  
MAKOTO OHARA ◽  
TOMOKI FUJIKAWA ◽  
HIROE NAGAIKE ◽  
HIDEKI KUSHIMA ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elena Succurro ◽  
Teresa Vanessa Fiorentino ◽  
Sofia Miceli ◽  
Maria Perticone ◽  
Angela Sciacqua ◽  
...  

<b>Objective</b>: Most, but not all studies suggested that women with type 2 diabetes have higher relative risk (RR) for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than men. More uncertainty exists on whether the RR for CVD is higher in prediabetic women compared to men. <p><b>Research Design and Methods</b>: In a cross-sectional study, in 3540 normal glucose tolerant (NGT), prediabetic, and diabetic adults, we compared the RR for prevalent non-fatal CVD between men and women. In a longitudinal study including 1658 NGT, prediabetic, and diabetic adults, we compared the RR for incident major adverse outcomes, including all-cause death, coronary heart disease, and cerebrovascular disease events after 5.6 years follow-up. </p> <p><b>Results:</b> Women with prediabetes and diabetes exhibited greater relative differences in BMI, waist circumference, blood pressure, total, LDL and HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting glucose, hsCRP, and white blood cell count than men with prediabetes and diabetes when compared with their NGT counterparts. We found a higher RR for prevalent CVD in diabetic women (RR 9.29; 95% CI 4.73-18.25; <i>P</i><0.0001) than in men (RR 4.56; 95% CI 3.07-6.77; <i>P</i><0.0001), but no difference in RR for CVD was observed comparing prediabetic women and men. In the longitudinal study, we found that diabetic, but not prediabetic women have higher RR (RR 5.25; 95% CI 3.22-8.56; <i>P</i><0.0001) of incident major adverse outcomes than their male counterparts (RR 2.72; 95% CI 1.81-4.08; <i>P</i><0.0001).</p> <p><b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggests that diabetic, but not prediabetic, women have higher RR for prevalent and incident major adverse outcomes than men. </p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document