scholarly journals Mis-regulating segmentation gene expression in Drosophila

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 111 (4) ◽  
pp. 1121-1135 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Parkhurst ◽  
D. Ish-Horowicz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Fusion Gene ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Normal Function ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Segmentation Gene Expression ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression ◽  
Pair Rule

We have used the hunchback (hb) gap-gene promoter to drive ectopic expression of the pair-rule genes fushi tarazu (ftz), even-skipped (eve) and hairy (h). Unexpectedly, flies transformed with such constructs are viable, despite spatial and temporal mis-regulation of pair-rule expression caused by the fusion genes. We show that fusion gene expression is transcriptionally regulated, such that ectopic expression is suppressed when pattern is established, and present evidence indicating that interstripe hb-ftz expression is repressed by eve. These results are considered in terms of redundant control of pair-rule gene striping. We also discuss the potential dangers of using mis-regulated gene expression to analyse normal function.

The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. II. Spatial repression by gap and pair-rule gene products

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.B. Carroll ◽  
S.H. Vavra
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Control Mechanisms ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Gene Mutant ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Regulatory Effects ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Zygotic Control

We examined gene expression patterns in certain single and double pair-rule mutant embryos to determine which of the largely repressive pair-rule gene interactions are most likely to be direct and which interactions are probably indirect. From these studies we conclude that: (i) hairy+ and even-skipped (eve+) regulate the fushi tarazu (ftz) gene; (ii) eve+ and runt+ regulate the hairy gene; (iii) runt+ regulates the eve gene; but, (iv) runt does not regulate the ftz gene pattern, and hairy does not regulate the eve gene pattern. These pair-rule interactions are not sufficient, however, to explain the periodicity of the hairy and eve patterns, so we examined specific gap gene mutant combinations to uncover their regulatory effects on these two genes. Our surprising observation is that the hairy and eve genes are expressed in embryos where the three key gap genes hunchback (hb), Kruppel (Kr), and knirps (kni) have been removed, indicating that these gap genes are not essential to activate the pair-rule genes. In fact, we show that in the absence of either hb+ or kni+, or both gap genes, the Kr+ product represses hairy expression. These results suggest that gap genes repress hairy expression in the interstripe regions, rather than activate hairy expression in the stripes. The molecular basis of pair-rule gene regulation by gap genes must involve some dual control mechanisms such that combinations of gap genes affect pair-rule transcription in a different manner than a single gap gene.

Concentration-dependent patterning by an ectopic expression domain of the Drosophila gap gene knirps

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (7) ◽  
pp. 1343-1354 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Kosman ◽  
S. Small
Keyword(s):  
Target Genes ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Asymmetric Distribution ◽  
Protein Diffusion ◽  
Expression Domain ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Transgenic Lines ◽  
Pair Rule

The asymmetric distribution of the gap gene knirps (kni) in discrete expression domains is critical for striped patterns of pair-rule gene expression in the Drosophila embryo. To test whether these domains function as sources of morphogenetic activity, the stripe 2 enhancer of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) was used to express kni in an ectopic position. Manipulating the stripe 2-kni expression constructs and examining transgenic lines with different insertion sites led to the establishment of a series of independent lines that displayed consistently different levels and developmental profiles of expression. Individual lines showed specific disruptions in pair-rule patterning that were correlated with the level and timing of ectopic expression. These results suggest that the ectopic domain acts as a source for morphogenetic activity that specifies regions in the embryo where pair-rule genes can be activated or repressed. Evidence is presented that the level and timing of expression, as well as protein diffusion, are important for determining the specific responses of target genes.

scholarly journals Evidence for the temporal regulation of insect segmentation by a conserved set of developmental transcription factors

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Clark ◽  
Andrew D. Peel
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Tribolium Castaneum ◽  
Fruit Fly ◽  
Temporal Regulation ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Spatiotemporal Information ◽  
Segmentation Gene Expression ◽  
Pair Rule

ABSTRACTLong-germ insects, such as the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, pattern their segments simultaneously, whereas short germ insects, such as the beetle Tribolium castaneum, pattern their segments sequentially, from anterior to posterior. While the two modes of segmentation at first appear to be very different, many details of segmentation gene expression are surprisingly similar between long-germ and short-germ species. Collectively, these observations hint that insect segmentation may involve fairly conserved patterning mechanisms, which occur within an evolutionarily malleable spatiotemporal framework. Based on genetic and comparative evidence, we now propose that, in both Drosophila and Tribolium embryos, the temporal progression of the segmentation process is regulated by a temporal sequence of Caudal, Dichaete, and Odd-paired expression. These three transcription factors are broadly expressed in segmenting tissues, providing spatiotemporal information that intersects with the information provided by periodically-expressed segmentation genes such as the pair-rule factors. However, they are deployed differently in long-germ versus short-germ insects, acting as simple timers in Drosophila, but as smooth, retracting wavefronts in Tribolium, compatible with either gap gene-based or oscillator-based generation of periodicity, respectively.

scholarly journals Gap gene properties of the pair-rule gene runt during Drosophila segmentation

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (6) ◽  
pp. 1671-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Tsai ◽  
J.P. Gergen
Keyword(s):  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Normal Component ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Antagonistic Effect ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
New Family ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

The Drosophila Runt protein is a member of a new family of transcriptional regulators that have important roles in processes extending from pattern formation in insect embryos to leukemogenesis in humans. We used ectopic expression to investigate runt's function in the pathway of Drosophila segmentation. Transient over-expression of runt under the control of a Drosophila heat-shock promoter caused stripe-specific defects in the expression patterns of the pair-rule genes hairy and even-skipped but had a more uniform effect on the secondary pair-rule gene fushi tarazu. Surprisingly, the expression of the gap segmentation genes, which are upstream of runt in the segmentation hierarchy was also altered in hs/runt embryos. A subset of these effects were interpreted as due to an antagonistic effect of runt on transcriptional activation by the maternal morphogen bicoid. In support of this, expression of synthetic reporter gene constructs containing oligomerized binding sites for the Bicoid protein was reduced in hs/runt embryos. Finally, genetic experiments demonstrated that regulation of gap gene expression by runt is a normal component of the regulatory program that generates the segmented body pattern of the Drosophila embryo.

Segmentation gene expression in the housefly Musca domestica

Development ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 113 (2) ◽  
pp. 419-430 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Sommer ◽  
D. Tautz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Musca Domestica ◽  
Segmentation Gene ◽  
Gap Genes ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Segmentation Gene Expression ◽  
Early Expression ◽  
Early Developmental ◽  
Pair Rule

Drosophila and Musca both belong to the group of higher dipteran flies and show morphologically a very similar early development. However, these two species are evolutionary separated by at least 100 million years. This presents the opportunity for a comparative analysis of segmentation gene expression across a large evolutionary distance in a very similar embryonic background. We have analysed in detail the early expression of the maternal gene bicoid, the gap genes hunchback, Kruppel, knirps and tailless, the pair-rule gene hairy, the segment-polarity gene engrailed and the homoeotic gene Ultrabithorax. We show that the primary expression domains of these genes are conserved, while some secondary expression aspects have diverged. Most notable is the finding of hunchback expression in 11–13 stripes shortly before gastrulation, as well as a delayed expression of terminal domains of various genes. We conclude that the early developmental gene hierarchy, as it has been defined in Drosophila, is evolutionary conserved in Musca domestica.

scholarly journals Odd-paired controls frequency doubling in Drosophila segmentation by altering the pair-rule gene regulatory network

eLife ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erik Clark ◽  
Michael Akam
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Regulatory Network ◽  
Regulatory Network ◽  
Frequency Doubling ◽  
Drosophila Embryo ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Regulatory Interactions ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Gene Regulatory ◽  
Pair Rule

The Drosophila embryo transiently exhibits a double-segment periodicity, defined by the expression of seven 'pair-rule' genes, each in a pattern of seven stripes. At gastrulation, interactions between the pair-rule genes lead to frequency doubling and the patterning of 14 parasegment boundaries. In contrast to earlier stages of Drosophila anteroposterior patterning, this transition is not well understood. By carefully analysing the spatiotemporal dynamics of pair-rule gene expression, we demonstrate that frequency-doubling is precipitated by multiple coordinated changes to the network of regulatory interactions between the pair-rule genes. We identify the broadly expressed but temporally patterned transcription factor, Odd-paired (Opa/Zic), as the cause of these changes, and show that the patterning of the even-numbered parasegment boundaries relies on Opa-dependent regulatory interactions. Our findings indicate that the pair-rule gene regulatory network has a temporally modulated topology, permitting the pair-rule genes to play stage-specific patterning roles.

The zygotic control of Drosophila pair-rule gene expression. I. A search for new pair-rule regulatory loci

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 107 (3) ◽  
pp. 663-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.H. Vavra ◽  
S.B. Carroll
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Periodic Patterns ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
New Type ◽  
Regulatory Loci ◽  
Direct Inspection ◽  
Pair Rule ◽  
Zygotic Control

The examination of pair-rule gene expression in wild-type and segmentation mutant embryos has identified many, but not necessarily all, of the elements of the regulatory system that establish their periodic patterns. Here we have conducted a new type of search for previously unknown regulators of these genes by examining pair-rule gene expression in blastoderm embryos lacking parts of or entire chromosomes. This method has the advantage of direct inspection of abnormal pair-rule gene patterns without relying upon mutagenesis or interpretation of larval phenotypes for the identification of segmentation genes. From these experiments we conclude that: (i) most zygotically required regulators of the fushi tarazu (ftz), even-skipped (eve) and hairy (h) pair-rule genes have been identified, except for one or more loci we have uncovered on chromosome arm 2L; (ii) the repression of the ftz and eve genes in the anterior third of the embryo is under maternal, not zygotic control; and (iii) there are no general zygotically required activators of pair-rule gene expression. The results suggest that the molecular basis of pair-rule gene regulation can be pursued with greater confidence now that most key trans-acting factors are already in hand.

Dose-dependent regulation of pair-rule stripes by gap proteins and the initiation of segment polarity

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 110 (3) ◽  
pp. 759-767 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Warrior ◽  
M. Levine
Keyword(s):  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Embryonic Cells ◽  
Periodic Patterns ◽  
Threshold Response ◽  
Gap Gene ◽  
Relative Placement ◽  
Segment Polarity ◽  
Pair Rule Gene ◽  
Pair Rule

A key step in Drosophila segmentation is the establishment of periodic patterns of pair-rule gene expression in response to gap gene products. From an examination of the distribution of gap and pair-rule proteins in various mutants, we conclude that the on/off periodicity of pair-rule stripes depends on both the exact concentrations and combinations of gap proteins expressed in different embryonic cells. It has been suggested that the distribution of gap gene products depends on cross-regulatory interactions among these genes. Here we provide evidence that autoregulation also plays an important role in this process since there is a reduction in the levels of Kruppel (Kr) RNA and protein in a Kr null mutant. Once initiated by the gap genes each pair-rule stripe is bell shaped and has ill-defined margins. By the end of the fourteenth nuclear division cycle, the stripes of the pair-rule gene even-skipped (eve) sharpen and polarize, a process that is essential for the precisely localized expression of segment polarity genes. This sharpening process appears to depend on a threshold response of the eve promoter to the combinatorial action of eve and a second pair-rule gene hairy. The eve and hairy expression patterns overlap but are out of register and the cells of maximal overlap form the anterior margin of the polarized eve stripe. We propose that the relative placement of the eve and hairy stripes may be an important factor in the initiation of segment polarity.

Mechanisms of mammalian zinc-regulated gene expression

2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1262-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Jackson ◽  
Ruth A. Valentine ◽  
Lisa J. Coneyworth ◽  
John C. Mathers ◽  
Dianne Ford
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcriptional Repression ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Mrna Levels ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Mrna Stabilization ◽  
Transcriptional Regulatory ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

Mechanisms through which gene expression is regulated by zinc are central to cellular zinc homoeostasis. In this context, evidence for the involvement of zinc dyshomoeostasis in the aetiology of diseases, including Type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and cancer, highlights the importance of zinc-regulated gene expression. Mechanisms elucidated in bacteria and yeast provide examples of different possible modes of zinc-sensitive gene regulation, involving the zinc-regulated binding of transcriptional activators and repressors to gene promoter regions. A mammalian transcriptional regulatory mechanism that mediates zinc-induced transcriptional up-regulation, involving the transcription factor MTF1 (metal-response element-binding transcription factor 1), has been studied extensively. Gene responses in the opposite direction (reduced mRNA levels in response to increased zinc availability) have been observed in mammalian cells, but a specific transcriptional regulatory process responsible for such a response has yet to be identified. Examples of single zinc-sensitive transcription factors regulating gene expression in opposite directions are emerging. Although zinc-induced transcriptional repression by MTF1 is a possible explanation in some specific instances, such a mechanism cannot account for repression by zinc of all mammalian genes that show this mode of regulation, indicating the existence of as yet uncharacterized mechanisms of zinc-regulated transcription in mammalian cells. In addition, recent findings reveal a role for effects of zinc on mRNA stability in the regulation of specific zinc transporters. Our studies on the regulation of the human gene SLC30A5 (solute carrier 30A5), which codes for the zinc transporter ZnT5, have revealed that this gene provides a model system by which to study both zinc-induced transcriptional down-regulation and zinc-regulated mRNA stabilization.

Human glucagon gene promoter sequences regulating tissue-specific versus nutrient-regulated gene expression

2002 ◽  
Vol 282 (1) ◽  
pp. R173-R183 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Nian ◽  
Jun Gu ◽  
David M. Irwin ◽  
Daniel J. Drucker
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Regulatory Sequences ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Tissue Specific ◽  
High Fiber ◽  
Fiber Diet ◽  
Regulated Gene Expression

The glucagon-like peptides (GLPs) are synthesized and secreted in a nutrient-dependent manner in rodents; however, the factors regulating human GLP-1 and GLP-2 biosynthesis remain unclear. To understand how nutrients regulate human proglucagon gene expression, we studied the expression of a human proglucagon promoter-growth hormone (GH) transgene in 1.6 human glucagon-GH transgenic mice. Fasting-refeeding significantly decreased and increased the levels of circulating mouse insulin and transgene-derived hGH ( P < 0.05 fasting vs. refeeding) and decreased and upregulated, respectively, the levels of endogenous mouse proglucagon RNA in the ileum but not in the jejunum or colon. High-fiber feeding significantly increased the levels of glucose-stimulated circulating hGH and upregulated levels of mouse intestinal proglucagon gene expression in the jejunum, ileum, and colon ( P < 0.05, 0 vs. 30% fiber diet). In contrast, neither fasting-refeeding nor a high-fiber diet upregulated the expression of the human proglucagon promoter-hGH transgene. These findings demonstrate that human proglucagon gene regulatory sequences specifying tissue-specific expression in gut endocrine cells are not sufficient for recognition of energy-derived signals regulating murine glucagon gene expression in enteroendocrine cells in vivo.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document