INTELLECTUAL RESOURCES IN RUSSIA IN INCREASE OF EFFICIENCY OF PUBLIC CONTROL IN THE CONSUMER MARKET

10.12737/2404 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 38-40
Author(s):  
Дроздова ◽  
K. Drozdova
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Consumer Market ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The People ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Successful Collaboration

Public control is one of the main methods to protect the most wide range of consumers of our country and also an instrument of its modernization. Today there is a need to expand the coverage of public control. Only a United force of the citizens themselves and their intelligence and cohesion will be able to provide a decent level of life in our country and make it more effective any authority, forcing the authority to act in the interests of the people. In this article we consider possibilities of public control in the sphere of protection of the rights of consumers, legislation improvement in the sphere of public control, cooperation between the government and society when carrying out public control. There is also brought an example of successful collaboration when carrying out actions of public control. In this article the main problems of development of system of public control in the Russian Federation are described, the author offers solutions of these problems.

THE VALUE OF LOVE IN THE SYSTEM OF FORMATION OF THE PROFESSIONAL MATURITY OF THE EDUCATOR

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (10(79)) ◽  
pp. 12-18
Author(s):  
G. Bubyreva
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
The State ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Family ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
The Individual ◽  
The Right

The existing legislation determines the education as "an integral and focused process of teaching and upbringing, which represents a socially important value and shall be implemented so as to meet the interests of the individual, the family, the society and the state". However, even in this part, the meaning of the notion ‘socially significant benefit is not specified and allows for a wide range of interpretation [2]. Yet the more inconcrete is the answer to the question – "who and how should determine the interests of the individual, the family and even the state?" The national doctrine of education in the Russian Federation, which determined the goals of teaching and upbringing, the ways to attain them by means of the state policy regulating the field of education, the target achievements of the development of the educational system for the period up to 2025, approved by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of October 4, 2000 #751, was abrogated by the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 29, 2014 #245 [7]. The new doctrine has not been developed so far. The RAE Academician A.B. Khutorsky believes that the absence of the national doctrine of education presents a threat to national security and a violation of the right of citizens to quality education. Accordingly, the teacher has to solve the problem of achieving the harmony of interests of the individual, the family, the society and the government on their own, which, however, judging by the officially published results, is the task that exceeds the abilities of the participants of the educational process.  The particular concern about the results of the patriotic upbringing served as a basis for the legislative initiative of the RF President V. V. Putin, who introduced the project of an amendment to the Law of RF "About Education of the Russian Federation" to the State Duma in 2020, regarding the quality of patriotic upbringing [3]. Patriotism, considered by the President of RF V. V. Putin as the only possible idea to unite the nation is "THE FEELING OF LOVE OF THE MOTHERLAND" and the readiness for every sacrifice and heroic deed for the sake of the interests of your Motherland. However, the practicing educators experience shortfalls in efficient methodologies of patriotic upbringing, which should let them bring up citizens, loving their Motherland more than themselves. The article is dedicated to solution to this problem based on the Value-sense paradigm of upbringing educational dynasty of the Kurbatovs [15].

The Object and Subject of Public Control in the Russian Federation: Theoretical and Legal Issues

2019 ◽  
pp. 11-19
Author(s):  
Galina Komkova ◽  
Elena Berdnikova
Keyword(s):  
Social Control ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Constitutional Court ◽  
Control Activity ◽  
Public Control ◽  
First Case ◽  
The Subject ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
Governmental Institutions

Social control can be considered as a legal relationship, on the one hand, and as a kind of social control, on the other. In the first case, its object is information as a public good or object of legal action, and the subject is the acquisition by its participants of subjective rights and legal obligations arising during their interaction. In the second case, the object is a participant in social interaction, whose actions and decisions are monitored and evaluated by the supervisory authority, the subject being the legal status of the object, determined by compliance with the goals and objectives of the control activity. The article examines such legal gap as the absence of clear definitions of the object and subject of public control. According to the authors, the term «public authority», which appears in these definitions, is abstract and makes perception of certain objects of public control ambiguous. The category of «publicly significant functions» used by both the federal and regional legislators and the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation is analyzed. From the position of the latter, even non-governmental institutions can perform these functions. The possibility of including the President of the Russian Federation in the list of objects studied by the authors is also being considered. It is concluded that, in general, his activities are not subject to public control, although there appear certain elements of parliamentary control while bringing the head of state to responsibility. The importance of competitive selection of civil servants with extensive public participation is emphasized. It is noted that the latter has no effect in appointing senior officials of the Government of the Russian Federation, and this may worsen the quality of its work. The authors give recommendations for improving legislation in this area.

Between Irony and Tragedy (To the Discussion about Education and Science in I&I)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2-1) ◽  
pp. 51-61
Author(s):  
Petr Orekhovsky ◽  
◽  
Vladimir Razumov ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Current State ◽  
Russian Higher Education ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Science And Education ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government ◽  
State Of Affairs

This note is a response to the criticism of colleagues who expressed their opinion about the publication: Razumov V.I., Orekhovsky P.A. Carnival Time: Russian Higher Education and Science in the Postmodern Era // Ideas and Ideals. – 2020. – Vol. 12, N 3, pt. 1. – P. 77–94. The article received ten different responses, including both agreements with some of the theses, and objections, as well as alternative proposals. The works represent a wide scientific geography from Abakan to Moscow, although the bulk of the reviews came from Novosibirsk. The authors represent various humanitarian specialties. An analysis of the works published in Ideas and Ideals allows us to conclude that the reforms of science and education undertaken by the Government of the Russian Federation are alarming. At the same time, attention is drawn to both dissatisfaction with the current state of affairs and a wide range of ideas about what strategy for the development of science and education is required in modern Russia. Similarly, very different positions are presented in relation to postmodernism and its role in changes in science and education. The authors make an attempt to characterize the grounds for the coincidence and difference of the positions of the debaters and authors.

scholarly journals Evaluation of innovative development of the Russian Federation based on the 2020 vision and strategy indicators

2019 ◽  
Vol 81 (2) ◽  
pp. 377-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. V. Zhuravlev ◽  
I. V. Kuksova ◽  
E. A. Gubertov ◽  
L. I. Churikov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Statistical Data ◽  
High Tech ◽  
Innovative Development ◽  
Current Time ◽  
Target Values ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Macroeconomic Indicators ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

The main indicators of the innovative development of the Russian Federation are considered on the basis of the data presented in two regulatory documents developed in 2008 and 2011. The indicators cover a wide range of areas of socio-economic development, and their values should be achieved by 2020. However, the targets of macroeconomic indicators laid down in the documents at the current moment of time are seen to be overestimated. The analysis of the main achievements in the field of innovative development of our country over a ten-year period is carried out. For the analysis, a set of statistical data published in various sources was used, as well as the values of target macroeconomic indicators published in the concept and strategy. Based on the assessment of indicators and their deviations, an analysis is made of the success of the innovative development of Russia in various areas - from the development of the high-tech sector to the publication activity of the authors. Based on the results obtained, it was concluded that these or those target values of macroeconomic indicators have been achieved at the current time and an assumption about achieving these values by 2020. In addition, based on the analysis, it was determined which of the three options for innovative development our country is implementing at the present stage. The main reasons that prevented the experts and the Government of the Russian Federation from reaching the main target indicators of the concept and strategy and transferring our country to “innovative tracks” are summarized.

scholarly journals Joint-stock companies as an object of public control in the Russian Federation

2020 ◽  
pp. 102-111
Author(s):  
Konstantin Valer'evich Vostrikov ◽  
Yatsek Zalesny ◽  
Ivan Sergeevich Pavlov ◽  
Sergei Vital'evich Skladchikov ◽  
Denis Dmitrievich Oblogin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Control ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Original Definition ◽  
Legitimate Interests ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
State And Local ◽  
Definition Of

This article is dedicated to the study of possibility of attribution of the joint-stock companies to the objects of public control in the Russian Federation. The authors believe that the institution of public control manifests as the key legal guarantee for the implementation, protection and defense of the constitutional principles of democracy and public participation in administration of state affairs. However, the implementation of this civil society institution is accompanied by numerous problems, one of which is the definition of the concept and the list of objects of public control. In this regard, the authors explore various approaches towards the question of attribution of joint-stock companies to objects of public control. The article formulates and substantiates the original definition of the concept of “public authorities”, which imply not only authority of the state and local self-governance, but also as the combination of such rights of separate subjects of law, the realization of which directly affects the mechanism of implementation, observation, protection and defense of the rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a wide range of citizens of the Russian Federation, foreign citizens, stateless persons, legal entities, as well as public authority bodies, including local self-governance. Therefore, it appears that joint-stock companies should be classified as a variety of the objects of public control. However, the possibility of organization and implementation of public control over their activity requires introducing certain amendments to the current legislation.

scholarly journals The concept of soft power in Russian foreign policy in the twenty-first century

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (1) ◽  
pp. 112-132
Author(s):  
Dejan Tadic
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Policy ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Soft Power ◽  
First Century ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Russian Foreign Policy ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Twenty First Century ◽  
The Government

The paper analyses the application of the concept of soft power in contemporary international relations in the case of the implementation of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation at the beginning of the twenty-first century. The author departs with the assumption that the government in Moscow uses a wide range of the soft power instruments and prove it on the case study of the combined use of hard and soft power instruments during the engagement in Syria. The analysis also includes the recent Russian foreign policy actions towards Serbia, and stresses out that the Russian Federation does not recognise sufficiently clear the benefits that our country provides in terms of promoting Russian national interests through the sophisticated application of the concept of soft power. The author concludes that the Russian Federation has not been using the full potential of their own sources of soft power in the foreign policy implementation process, and that the use of soft power is not sophisticated and optimal-except in the media.

scholarly journals Problems of qualification of turnover of alcohol surrogates

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 30-32
Author(s):  
N.Y. Skripchenko ◽  
◽  
A.N. Savchenko ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Alcoholic Beverages ◽  
Place Of Residence ◽  
Consumer Market ◽  
Legal Assessment ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Russian Federation

The authors question the validity of the criminal legal assessment under Art. 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of actions of persons who make handicraft alcoholcontaining surrogates, store them at the place of residence and sell them ‘off hand’ under the guise of alcoholic beverages. The foundations of this practice were laid by the changes made to the content of Art. 238 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in 1999. Having extended the said rule not only to cases of circulation of low-quality goods in the legal consumer market, but also to the facts of the sale of goods dangerous to the life and health of consumers in the shadow sector of the economy, the legislator ‘transferred’ a wide range of acts previously assessed as administrative offenses. The work substantiates the position that the actions of persons who make and sell alcoholic surrogates ‘from hand’ are of an administratively punishable nature, they can be criminal only if they cause harm to the life and health (of any severity) of ‘consumers’.

Interactive Forms of Societal Control over the Activities of State Authorities in the Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation

10.12737/7253 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 0-0
Author(s):  
Арина Лапшина ◽  
Arina Lapshina
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Information Technologies ◽  
Public Authorities ◽  
Public Control ◽  
The Public ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Modern Information ◽  
The Government

The article is devoted to the analysis of interactive forms of public control over the activities of public authorities in subjects of the Russian Federation and analysis of the main problems of their realization. The author comes to a conclusion that the efficiency of the public control in the interactive forms based on activity of subjects of the Russian Federation on building dialogue with citizens, on the use of modern information technologies, as well as on the willingness of the society to participate in the decision-making for State. The author proposes to continue the work on the automation of the processes of realization of public control, to expand the range of public actions of public authorities in subjects of the Russian Federation, in the case of it is possible to conduct control in interactive forms, to construct mechanisms of monitor the activities of public authorities of subjects of the Russian Federation on the problems solving during the process of public control, to guarantee a opportunity of assessment of the citizens timely "response" of the government on such problems.

Inclusive Living in Russia as an Aspect of the Multidimensionality of Social Inclusion

2021 ◽  
pp. 84-92
Author(s):  
Denis B. Litvintsev ◽  
◽  
Lyudmila B. Mozheykina ◽  
Valeria V. Degtyareva ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Housing Policy ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Social Inclusion ◽  
National Standards ◽  
Inclusive Design ◽  
Legal Institutions ◽  
Persons With Disabilities ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
The Government

Inclusive education of people with disabilities today is a fairly popular object of research among a wide range of specialists (sociologists, psychologists, social workers); however, disabilities are far from the only factor of social exclusion, and education is not the only process aimed at increasing the inclusiveness of society. The multidimensionality of social inclusion makes it possible, in the framework of this study, to single out the aspect of inclusive living. This aspect is revealed in the ideas of inclusive design of dwellings themselves and the urban space in general, is ensured by the construction of inclusive housing, and is supported by the inclusive housing policy of the state. Thus, the aim of this study is to identify and conceptualize inclusive living as an aspect of multidimensional social inclusion in the context of the transformation of social and legal institutions in Russia. During the study, the general scientific methods of analysis, synthesis, generalization, comparison, and analogy were used. The theoretical basis of the study was the works of Russian and mainly foreign researchers in the field of inclusive housing policy, inclusive housing, inclusive design, etc. The legal framework for the study was the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, federal laws of the Russian Federation, resolutions of the Government of the Russian Federation, orders of ministries, national standards, etc. As a result of the study, the authors' definition of the concept of inclusive living is proposed: it is a living socially autonomous from the helping subject, in which each person, regardless of the physical, intellectual and other characteristics, is provided with a socioeconomic opportunity to choose the place of residence (a specific house or apartment) and roommates (regardless of gender and age) they like, and freely interact with neighbors (for example, at general meetings). In the course of the study, some assessment is also given to the transformation of social and legal institutions in Russia aimed at increasing the inclusiveness of the residence of certain social groups (disabled people, elderly people, etc.). In addition, the authors suggest that the inclusiveness of living can be considered as one of the indicators of the quality of life of the population of a particular state, which requires further research on the institutional factors that determine social inclusion or exclusion in this context.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document