Giant placenta chorioangioma with postpartum bleeding and uterine atony

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 670-673
Author(s):  
Maria Carolina Castañeda ◽  
Nicolás Luna Acero ◽  
Mauricio Manrique Samer ◽  
Mariana Medina Celis ◽  
Myriam C Pardo ◽  
...  

Chorioangioma is the most commonly occurring vascular, non-malignant placental tumor in pregnancy, with a reported incidence of 1% in all examined placentas. Nonetheless, real tumor incidence remains unknown because of small specimen sizes, which contributes to a lack of detection throughout the entire gestational period. Prenatal detection and diagnosis may be possible with ultrasound screening; however, most placental chorioangioma diagnoses are postnatal, based upon histopathological studies. This article report the case of postnatal diagnosis and associated complications in a 35-year-old patient with a 6 cm × 4 cm × 4 cm placental chorioangioma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunyan Zeng ◽  
Feng Yang ◽  
Chunhua Wu ◽  
Junlin Zhu ◽  
Xiaoming Guan ◽  
...  

Uterine prolapse complicating pregnancy is rare. Two cases are presented here: one patient had uterine prolapse at both her second and third pregnancy, and the other developed only once prolapse during pregnancy. This report will analyze etiology, clinical characteristics, complication, and treatment of uterine prolapse in pregnancy. Routine gynecologic examination should be carried out during pregnancy. If uterine prolapse occurred, conservative treatment could be used to prolong the gestational period as far as possible. Vaginal delivery is possible, but caesarean section seems a better alternative when prolapsed uterus cannot resolve during childbirth.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e036566
Author(s):  
Clément Ferrier ◽  
Babak Khoshnood ◽  
Ferdinand Dhombres ◽  
Hanitra Randrianaivo ◽  
Isabelle Perthus ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo assess trends in the average costs and effectiveness of the French ultrasound screening programme for birth defects.DesignA population-based study.SettingNational Public Health Insurance claim database.ParticipantsAll pregnant women in the ‘Echantillon Généraliste des Bénéficiaires’, a permanent representative sample of 1/97 of the individuals covered by the French Health Insurance System.Main outcomes measuresTrends in the costs and in the average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER) of the screening programme (in € per case detected antenatally), per year, between 2006 and 2014. incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) from 1 year to another were also estimated. We assessed costs related to the ultrasound screening programme of birth defects excluding the specific screening of Down’s syndrome. The outcome for effectiveness was the prenatal detection rate of birth defects, assessed in a previous study. Linear and logistic regressions were used to analyse time trends.ResultsDuring the study period, there was a slight decrease in prenatal detection rates (from 58.2% in 2006 to 55.2% in 2014; p=0.015). The cost of ultrasound screening increased from €168 in 2006 to €258 per pregnancy in 2014 (p=0.001). We found a 61% increase in the ACER for ultrasound screening during the study period. ACERs increased from €9050 per case detected in 2006 to €14 580 per case detected in 2014 (p=0.001). ICERs had an erratic pattern, with a strong tendency to show that any increment in the cost of screening was highly cost ineffective.ConclusionEven if the increase in costs may be partly justified, we observed a diminishing returns for costs associated with the prenatal ultrasound screening of birth defects, in France, between 2006 and 2014.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e025482 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Ferrier ◽  
Ferdinand Dhombres ◽  
Babak Khoshnood ◽  
Hanitra Randrianaivo ◽  
Isabelle Perthus ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo analyse trends in the number of ultrasound examinations in relation to the effectiveness of prenatal detection of birth defects using population-based data in France.DesignA multiple registry-based study of time trends in resource use (number of ultrasounds) and effectiveness (proportion of cases prenatally diagnosed).SettingThree registries of congenital anomalies and claims data on ultrasounds for all pregnant women in France.ParticipantsThere were two samples of pregnant women. Effectiveness was assessed using data from three French birth defect registries. Resource use for ultrasound screening was based on the French national healthcare database.Main outcome measuresThe main outcome measures were prenatal diagnosis (effectiveness) and the average number of ultrasounds (resource use). Statistical analyses included linear and logistic regression models to assess trends in resource use and effectiveness of prenatal testing, respectively.ResultsThe average number of ultrasound examinations per pregnancy significantly increased over the study period, from 2.47 in 2006 to 2.98 in 2014 (p=0.005). However, there was no significant increase in the odds of prenatal diagnosis. The probability of prenatal diagnosis was substantially higher for cases associated with a chromosomal anomaly (91.2%) than those without (51.8%). However, there was no evidence of an increase in prenatal detection of either over time.ConclusionsThe average number of ultrasound examinations per pregnancy increased over time, whereas the probability of prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies did not. Hence, there is a need to implement policies such as high-quality training programmes which can improve the efficiency of ultrasound examinations for prenatal detection of congenital anomalies.


Author(s):  
Tamara Illescas ◽  
Waldo Sepulveda ◽  
Begona Adiego ◽  
Pilar Martinez-Ten

ABSTRACT In the last 20 years, the role of first-trimester ultrasound screening has expanded from individual calculation of the risk of aneuploidy through measurement of the nuchal translucency to a powerful technique to evaluate important aspects of the fetal anatomy. Traditionally, the full anatomy scan for detection of structural anomalies has been performed in the second trimester of pregnancy. However, with the implementation of the first-trimester scan at 11 to 13 weeks of gestation many of the structural anomalies traditionally detected in the second trimester can now be identified earlier in pregnancy. In the first part of this review we discuss the main ultrasound findings that may facilitate the prenatal detection of fetal brain, face and neck abnormalities in the first trimester of pregnancy. How to cite this article Sepulveda W, Illescas T, Adiego B, Martinez-Ten P. Prenatal Detection of Fetal Anomalies at the 11- to 13-Week Scan—Part I: Brain, Face and Neck. Donald School J Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;7(4):359-368.


The Lancet ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 336 (8712) ◽  
pp. 387-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Saari-Kemppainen ◽  
O. Karjalainen ◽  
P. Ylostalo ◽  
O.P. Heinonen

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (B) ◽  
pp. 1124-1130
Author(s):  
Andrea Ballini ◽  
Luca Signorini ◽  
Alessio Danilo Inchingolo ◽  
Rajiv Saini ◽  
Antonio Gnoni ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Probiotics are living microorganisms that confer a health benefit when administered in adequate amounts. There is evidence in the current literature about the importance of probiotic use in pregnancy. The early supplementation of probiotics in the perinatal and postnatal periods seems to have a positive impact on the overall mother’s health and future health of infants. AIM: Our pilot study aimed to test the ability of specific probiotics strains in combination with the kiwi-unique enzyme actinidin to improve the availability of folic acid in 20 pregnant women. METHODS: We investigate 20 pregnant women in early (4–10 weeks) (6 patients), intermedium (11–20 weeks) (6 patients), and late (21–30 weeks) (8 patients) pregnancy. RESULTS: Our findings show that the tested formula promotes increased concentration of serum folate in women’s blood and contributes to the control of blood sugar and body weight, regardless of the gestational period (early, intermediate or late). CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the main results reported in the scientific literature about the importance of probiotics intake in pregnancy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document