Assessing pain in rabbits: how well does the Rabbit Grimace Scale work in the veterinary practice?

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 282-287
Author(s):  
Danielle Shaw ◽  
Jessica Parkes ◽  
Helen Reynolds
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Score System ◽  
Veterinary Practice ◽  
Video Observations ◽  
Veterinary Surgeon ◽  
Pain Recognition

Background: Pain recognition in rabbits (Oryctolagous cuniculi) can be a challenging task for the registered veterinary nurse (RVN) and can often result in the delivery of suboptimal nursing care if pain goes undetected. Although the Rabbit Grimace Scale (RbtGS) can assist in pain assessment, it is a tool that is currently underutilised in practice. Aims: The aim of this research was to evaluate the efficacy of the RbtGS to assess if it is useful in the veterinary practice to improve rabbit welfare standards. Methods: 31 individuals, 25 student veterinary nurses and six RVNs participated, taking RbtGS scores for 19 rabbits through either live or video observations. The rabbits were either healthy or experiencing a pre-existing illness or health condition as assessed by a veterinary surgeon. Results: The RbtGS scores indicated that the majority of participants were unable to accurately identify the rabbits most likely to be in pain, suggesting that it may not be an optimal tool in rabbit pain assessment. However, RVNs who had more experience in practice were better at identifying signs of pain and stress in the rabbits. Conclusion: Experience and ongoing education is invaluable to improve rabbit care. There is a need for a veterinary rabbit pain score system in order to standardise pain management across species.

scholarly journals  Pain in domestic animals and how to assess it: a review

2012 ◽  
Vol 57 (No. 4) ◽  
pp. 185-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Landa
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Animal Welfare ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Domestic Animals ◽  
Current Review ◽  
Adult Humans ◽  
Clinical Responses ◽  
General Signs ◽  
Species Specific ◽  
Pain Recognition

 In recent years more attention has been paid to the issue of pain in animals, particularly in association with increasing awareness of animal welfare. It is therefore necessary for veterinarians to be able recognise unambiguously whether an animal suffers from pain. Adult humans suffering from pain can more or less characterise their painful experiences, including the site and intensity of the pain. However, pain in animals is in some aspects more complex and it can be rather difficult to evaluate the seriousness and impact of painful events. Therefore, in animals we have to recognise the signs of pain according to indirect markers which involve behavioural, physiological and finally clinical responses. Moreover, in particular the behavioural changes associated with pain can be along with the general signs also species-specific, and hardly recognisable (and for an inexperienced observer seemingly unimportant) which makes pain assessment even more complicated. Therefore, the current review formulates definitions of pain, its classification and is focused on methods that may facilitate pain recognition in animals, which is crucial for an effective pain assessment and consequent effective pain management. The review combines recent knowledge with well proven facts concerning pain and furthermore also highlights the author’s own research on pain assessment.    

The revised FLACC score: Reliability and validation for pain assessment in children with cerebral palsy

2015 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-61 ◽  
Author(s):  
Line Kjeldgaard Pedersen ◽  
Ole Rahbek ◽  
Lone Nikolajsen ◽  
Bjarne Møller-Madsen
Keyword(s):  
Cerebral Palsy ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Reliability And Validity ◽  
Measurement Properties ◽  
Cosmin Checklist ◽  
Children With Cerebral Palsy

AbstractBackground and aimsPain in children with cerebral palsy (CP) is difficult to assess and is therefore not sufficiently recognized and treated. Children with severe cognitive impairments have an increased risk of neglected postoperative, procedural and chronic pain resulting in decreased quality of life. The r-FLACC (revised Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consol ability) pain score is an internationally acclaimed tool for assessing pain in children with CP because of its ease to use and its use of core pain behaviours. In addition the r-FLACC pain score may be superior to other pain assessment tools since it includes an open- ended descriptor for incorporation of individual pain behaviours. The COSMIN group has set up three quality domains, which describe the quality of Health-Related Patient-Reported Outcomes (HR-PROs). These are reliability (internal consistency, reliability and measurement error), validity (content validity, construct validity and criterion validity) and responsiveness. The r-FLACC score has only been assessed for reliability and validity in the original English version by the developers of the score. The aim of this study is to assess reliability and validity of the r-FLACC pain score for use in Danish children with CP.MethodsTwenty-seven children aged 3–15 years old with CP were included after orthopaedic surgery. Two methods for assessment of postoperative pain were used. Pain intensity was assessed by r-FLACC, with a 2 min standardized video recording of the child, and the Observational Visual Analogue Score (VAS-OBS) assessed by the parents. The COSMIN checklist was used as a guideline in the reliability and validity testing of the r-FLACC score.ResultsReliability was supported by three measurement properties. Internal consistency was excellent with a Cronbachs alpha of 0.9023 and 0.9758 (two raters). A factor analysis of the subgroups in the r-FLACC score showed unidimensionality. A test-retest showed excellent intra-rater reliability with an intraclass correlation (ICC) of 0.97530. Inter-rater reliability was acceptable with an ICC of 0.74576. Validity was supported by three measurement properties. Content validity was tested by the originators of the r-FLACC. Construct validity was supported by a significant increase in r-FLACC scores following surgery (n = 17; difference 2.23; p = 0.0397). Criterion validity was acceptable with Pearson’s correlation coefficients of 0.76 and 0.59 when comparing r-FLACC scores and VAS-OBS scores.Conclusions and implicationsThis study benefits from a systematical approach to the validation and reliability parameters by using the COSMIN checklist as a guideline. It is evident that the r-FLACC pain score maintains its psychometric properties after translation. In conclusion, the r-FLACC pain score is valid and reliable in assessing postoperative pain in children with CP not able to self-report pain. With the r-FLACC pain score clinicians have a valid tool for assessing postoperative pain, hence increasing the quality of pain management in children with CP. In addition the validated r-FLACC score has the potential for use in interventional research regarding pain management in this vulnerable group of patients. Future perspectives include validation of the r-FLACC score for procedural and chronic everyday pain and implementation into daily practice.

scholarly journals Using Artificial Intelligence to Improve Pain Assessment and Pain Management: A Scoping Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 636-636
Author(s):  
Meina Zhang ◽  
Linzee Zhu ◽  
Shih-Yin Lin ◽  
Keela Herr ◽  
Nai-Ching Chi
Keyword(s):  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Language Processing ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Pain Recognition ◽  
State Of The Science ◽  
Pain Prediction

Abstract Approximate 50 million U.S. adults experience chronic pain. It is a widely held view that pain has been linked to sleep disturbance, mental problems, and reduced quality of life. Uncontrolled pain has led to increased healthcare utilization, hospitalization, emergency visits, and financial burden. Recognizing, assessing, understanding, and treating pain can improve outcomes of patients and healthcare use. A comprehensive synthesis of the current use of AI-based interventions in pain management and pain assessment and their outcomes will guide the development of future clinical trials. This review aims to investigate the state of the science of AI-based interventions designed to improve pain management and pain assessment for adult patients. The electronic databases Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library were searched. The search identified 2131 studies, and 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. The Critical Appraisals Skills Programme was used to assess the quality. This review provides evidence that machine learning, deep learning, data mining, and natural language processing were used to improve efficient pain recognition and pain assessment (44%), analyze self-reporting pain data (6%), predict pain (6%), and help physicians and patients to more effectively manage with chronic pain (44%). Findings from this review suggest that using AI-based interventions to improve pain recognition, pain prediction, and pain self-management is effective; however, most studies are pilot study which raises concerns about the generalizability of findings. Future research should focus on examining AI-based approaches on a larger cohort and over a longer period of time.

Improving access to timely pain management in an underserved oncology clinic: A palliative care-oncology partnership.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18672-e18672
Author(s):  
Aaron Chan ◽  
Radu Firtat ◽  
Christopher Metchnikoff ◽  
Phillis Wu ◽  
Katherine Yu
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Therapeutic Interventions ◽  
Average Score

e18672 Background: In the 4 years since inception, the palliative care (PC) clinic at Olive-View UCLA Medical Center (OVMC) cared for less than 6% of pain-positive cancer patients based on guidelines put forth by ASCO. As with other under-resourced safety-net settings, the demand for PC services at OVMC far exceeds the manpower available for optimal pain management in oncology patients. This year long project aims to improve pain management in a busy oncology clinic via enhanced identification and prompt treatment of cancer pain by Oncologists. Methods: At the project start, Oncologists were surveyed to identify key elements to be incorporated into formal didactics on pain management principles, case-based discussions and real-time mentoring. At the weekly oncology clinic, patients were screened for pain using the multi-modal PEG scale: Average Pain intensity (P), interference with Enjoyment of life (E), and interference with General activity (G) over the preceding week. The Oncologist was notified of the PEG score if a patient had an average score ≥4 (0-10 scale) for review and intervention. Patients were screened using the same method at subsequent visits. EHR of patients with PEG scores ≥4 were reviewed to determine whether therapeutic interventions were made by the Oncologist. A comparison of PEG scores to the standard nursing intake pain scores was also conducted. Results: Over a 4-month period, 513 PEG forms were administered, 37% of which resulted in a pain score ≥4. Of the 172 patients who screened positive, 54 patients were screened at follow up visit(s). Comparing the pain-positive cohort, we observed an average decrease in pain by 25.5% (7.1 to 5.3) in patients who received intervention as opposed to 7.4% (5.0 to 4.7) in patients who did not receive intervention by their Oncologist. Further, there was a remarkable divergence between the average PEG score (6.7) and nurse intake pain score (1.4) in this patient cohort. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that improved Oncologist real-time pain assessment and intervention incorporating a validated pain screening tool leads to timely pain management in cancer patients. Implementation of a Palliative Care-Oncology partnership promotes provider awareness and confidence in treating patients with complex pain. A functional pain assessment, using PEG, can more accurately reflect pain compared to the current standard nursing intake process. Particularly in resource challenged settings where access to PC is limited, facilitating timely pain management through training and mentoring of oncologists or other primary providers can be a sustainable model to improve patient access to primary palliative care. Given the early indicators of success we hope to expand this workflow in training other healthcare providers within our County safety net system. Research Sponsor: California Health Care Foundation.

scholarly journals Methods for Pain Assessment in Calves and Their Use for the Evaluation of Pain during Different Procedures—A Review

Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 1235
Author(s):  
Theresa Tschoner
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Research Data ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Literature Research ◽  
Field Practice ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Evaluation And Assessment

The evaluation and assessment of the level of pain calves are experiencing is important, as the experience of pain (e.g., due to routine husbandry procedures) severely affects the welfare of calves. Studies about the recognition of pain in calves, and especially pain management during and after common procedures, such as castration, dehorning, and disbudding, have been published. This narrative review discusses and summarizes the existing literature about methods for pain assessment in calves. First, it deals with the definition of pain and the challenges associated with the recognition of pain in calves. Then it proceeds to outline the different options and methods for subjective and objective pain assessment in calves, as described in the literature. Research data show that there are several tools suitable for the assessment of pain in calves, at least for research purposes. Finally, it concludes that for research purposes, various variables for the assessment of pain in calves are used in combination. However, there is no variable which can be used solely for the exclusive assessment of pain in calves. Also, further research is needed to describe biomarkers or variables which are easily accessible in the field practice.

scholarly journals Pain Assessment: Benefits of Using Pain Scales for Surgical Patients in South Bohemian Hospitals

Healthcare ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 171
Author(s):  
Vera Olisarova ◽  
Valerie Tothova ◽  
Martin Cerveny ◽  
Vendula Dvorakova ◽  
Petr Sadilek
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Exploratory Study ◽  
Surgical Patients ◽  
The South ◽  
Pain Scales ◽  
Emotional Component ◽  
Attention To Pain

Pain is a medical and nursing problem that is common in surgical departments. Inadequate pain management can lead to patient distress, as well as extending the period in which the patient’s quality of life is reduced. The standardized SF-MPQ-2 questionnaire provides nurses with the opportunity to assess pain within a broader context. The aim of this descriptive and exploratory study was to describe the state of pain assessment in surgical patients in the South Bohemian Region and to highlight the benefits of using a standardized tool for proper pain assessment. The research was carried out using a quantitative survey within the South Bohemian Region (Czech Republic). The participants in the study were nurses working in surgical departments in hospitals in the region as well as hospitalized patients. The results show that nurses pay slightly more attention to pain assessments than doctors. We know that, generally, pain decreases with time after surgery. Nonetheless, returning pain, as well as continuous pain, can occur, both of which have an emotional component. The results of this study are directed at nurses and include a call for more effective pain management through improved assessment.

scholarly journals Pre-Hospital Pain Management in Children with Injuries: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 3056
Author(s):  
Ada Holak ◽  
Michał Czapla ◽  
Marzena Zielińska
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Pain Assessment ◽  
Rating Scales ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Numeric Rating Scale ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
School Age Children ◽  
Medical Teams

Background: The all-too-frequent failure to rate pain intensity, resulting in the lack of or inadequacy of pain management, has long ceased to be an exclusive problem of the young patient, becoming a major public health concern. This study aimed to evaluate the methods used for reducing post-traumatic pain in children and the frequency of use of such methods. Additionally, the methods of pain assessment and the frequency of their application in this age group were analysed. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 2452 medical records of emergency medical teams dispatched to injured children aged 0–18 years in the area around Warsaw (Poland). Results: Of all injured children, 1% (20 out of 2432) had their pain intensity rated, and the only tool used for this assessment was the numeric rating scale (NRS). Children with burns most frequently received a single analgesic drug or cooling (56.2%), whereas the least frequently used method was multimodal treatment combining pharmacotherapy and cooling (13.5%). Toddlers constituted the largest percentage of patients who were provided with cooling (12%). Immobilisation was most commonly used in adolescents (29%) and school-age children (n = 186; 24%). Conclusions: Low frequency of pain assessment emphasises the need to provide better training in the use of various pain rating scales and protocols. What is more, non-pharmacological methods (cooling and immobilisation) used for reducing pain in injured children still remain underutilized.

scholarly journals Complex Regional Pain Syndrome: Current Practice Management and Referral Trends in a Closed Healthcare System

Osteology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-47
Author(s):  
Connor Zale ◽  
Joshua Hansen ◽  
Paul Ryan
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Score ◽  
Complex Regional Pain Syndrome ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Pain Syndrome ◽  
Occupational Outcomes ◽  
Mean Delay ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Over Time

Background: Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurologic condition that can present with severe pain and dysfunction. Delay in treatment adversely affects outcomes. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient outcomes as they relate to the time from diagnosis to pain management referral once the diagnosis of CRPS has been made in a closed healthcare system. Methods: A retrospective record review from a closed healthcare system was utilized for CRPS cases from 2010–2019. Demographics, injury pattern, surgeries, pain score, treatment modalities, occupational outcomes, and time to pain management referral were recorded. Results: There were 26 cases of CRPS that met inclusion criteria. The mean time from diagnosis to treatment was 55 days. 16/26 (61.5%) were medically discharged from the military. 23/26 (88.5%) were unable to return to full duty due to CRPS. There was no significant difference in the reported pain scores over time regardless of treatment (p = 0.76). A linear regression demonstrated a significantly higher Visual Analog Scale Pain Score (VAS) over time in patients that were medically discharged (p = 0.022). Conclusions: The mean delay in referral to the pain service was 55 days. The majority of patients (88.5%) did not return to full duty secondary to the diagnosis of CRPS, and 61.5% of patients required medical separation from active duty. Due to the negative impact that the diagnosis of CRPS has on occupational outcomes with a mean delay in referral of 55 days, clinics and providers should set up referral criteria and establish early pain pathways for patients diagnosed with CRPS.

Otitis externa: the role of the veterinary nurse

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 306-310
Author(s):  
Sue Paterson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Otitis Externa ◽  
Diagnosis And Treatment ◽  
External Ear ◽  
Ear Canal ◽  
Veterinary Practice ◽  
External Ear Canal ◽  
Veterinary Surgeon

Otitis externa is a common problem in primary care veterinary practice. While the diagnosis and treatment of disease is the responsibility of the attending veterinary surgeon, the veterinary nurse, as an integral part of the veterinary surgeon-led team, plays an important role in the investigation and management of disease. Veterinary nurses are more than capable of assessing the external ear canal both macroscopically and cytologically to help the veterinary surgeon to make a diagnosis. Client facing nurse communications can help with the administration of therapy, provide owner support during treatment to increase compliance and help with follow-up assessments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document