Management of Hip Fractures in the Era of the Subspecialist Orthopaedic Surgeon

2010 ◽  
Vol 92 (7) ◽  
pp. 1-3
Author(s):  
MA Bhutta ◽  
M Mawdsley ◽  
M Jones ◽  
M Fehily
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Burden Of Disease ◽  
Significant Morbidity ◽  
Common Cause ◽  
The World ◽  
Significant Burden ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk

Increased life expectancy throughout the world is producing an aging population. With an estimated lifetime incidence of hip fracture in women and men of 18% and 6%, respectively, this represents the most common cause of injury requiring hospitalisation in those over the age of 65. In the UK in 2007 70,000 people over the age of 60 sustained a hip fracture. With numbers expected to rise by 2% every year, by 2020 101,000 patients will require medical care for this injury (National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) website: http://www.nhfd.co.uk/). There is significant morbidity and mortality associated with hip fracture and one-year mortality ranges from 14% to 36%, presenting a significant burden of disease both medically and socially.

scholarly journals Dedicated Hip Fracture Lists: Improving the Service Received by Orthopaedic Trauma Patients

2013 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
SZ Basheer ◽  
DI Wood ◽  
K Shepherd ◽  
JC McGregor-Riley
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Orthopaedic Trauma ◽  
Proximal Femoral Fractures ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk

Proximal femoral fractures are the most common injury resulting in acute admission to an orthopaedic trauma ward. Up to 75,000 hip fractures occur per year in the UK and this is projected to rise to around 100,000 per year by 2020. These fractures occur most frequently in frail, elderly patients who have significant co-morbidities and they are consequently associated with high mortality rates of 5–10% at one month and up to 30% at one year following injury.

scholarly journals Re-Admissions Following Hip Fracture Surgery

2009 ◽  
Vol 91 (7) ◽  
pp. 591-595 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Hahnel ◽  
Hannah Burdekin ◽  
Sanjeev Anand
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Index Admission ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Hip Fracture Surgery ◽  
Fatal Adverse Events ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Fracture Surgery

INTRODUCTION Hip fractures in the elderly are a growing problem with a predicted incidence of 117,000 cases per year by 2016. Re-admission following a healthcare episode is an important outcome measure, which reflects non-fatal adverse events and indicates the natural history of disease. The purpose of this observational, multicentre audit was to examine rates and reasons for re-admission following hip fracture, to identify areas in the index admission and rehabilitation care that could be improved to prevent re-admission. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 535 patients (> 65 years old) in two district general hospitals in the UK who underwent hip fracture surgery were recruited into the study. RESULTS Of the study cohort, 72 patients (13.5%) died during their index admission and 88 (19.0%) of 463 patients were re-admitted once within 3 months. Causes of re-admission were attributed to medical (54.8%), failure to rehabilitate (23.8%), orthopaedic (19.0%) and surgical (2.4%) reasons. Infection was the most common (31.0%) reason for re-admission and arguably the most treatable. During the 3-month postoperative period, the mortality rate was 21.3%, increasing in those re-admitted to 35.1% representing the frailty of this group of patients. CONCLUSIONS High rates of re-admission are seen following discharge in elderly patients with hip fractures. Re-admitted patients have high mortality rates. Understanding causes of re-admission may help to reduce this burden.

scholarly journals Outcome after conservatively managed intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck

2015 ◽  
Vol 97 (4) ◽  
pp. 279-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
LS Moulton ◽  
NL Green ◽  
T Sudahar ◽  
NK Makwana ◽  
JP Whittaker
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Mortality Data ◽  
Study Cohort ◽  
Infection Pressure ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Admission Status ◽  
American Society ◽  
One Year ◽  
The Uk

Introduction In 2012, 2.6% of hip-fracture patients in the UK were treated conservatively. There is little data on outcome for these patients. However, one study demonstrated that though 30-day mortality is higher, mortality over the rest of the year is comparable with that in surgical groups. Therefore, we assessed conservatively managed patients in our unit. Methods Patients with intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck treated by conservative means between 2010 and 2012 inclusive were identified. Data were collected: American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade, Nottingham Hip Fracture Score (NHFS), mobility, mortality (30 days and one year) and pain levels. Results Thirty-two patients formed the study cohort. Mean age was 85.6 years. Median ASA grade was 4. Mortality at 30 days and one year was 31.3% and 56.3%, respectively. There was one case of pneumonia and one of infection. Pressure sores or venous thromboembolism were not documented. Three patients underwent surgery once their health improved. In general, mobility was decreased, but 30.8% of patients could mobilise with two aids or a frame. Only two cases had ongoing problems with pain. Conclusions Our data are similar to those published previously. Our patients were likely to have higher mortality data due to selection bias. Thirty-day mortality was significantly higher than the national average, but patients surviving 30 days had a prevalence of mortality similar to those managed by surgical means. Despite mobility decreasing from the pre-admission status, a considerable number of patients were free of pain and could mobilise. These data suggest that conservative management of intracapsular fractures of the femoral neck can produce acceptable results.

Hip Fracture Treatment in Oulu — One-Year Survey with Four-Month Follow-Up

2006 ◽  
Vol 95 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Saarenpää ◽  
T. Heikkinen ◽  
J. Partanen ◽  
P. Jalovaara
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Gamma Nail ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Fracture Treatment ◽  
Trochanteric Fractures ◽  
Cervical Fractures ◽  
Walking Aids ◽  
One Year

Backgrounds and Aims: The standardized forms of the Standardized Audit of Hip Fractures in Europe (SAHFE) are aimed for the evaluation of hip fracture treatment in different hospitals and countries. The purpose was to evaluate and characterize a cohort of hip fracture patients with these forms and to evaluate their value in quality control. Material and Methods: The non-pathological hip fractures in patients over 49 years of age treated in the Oulu University Hospital were prospectively recorded during a one-year period using SAHFE forms. Results: There were 238 (52 male and 186 female) patients with a mean age of 78 (50–102) years. Fifty-nine percent of the patients were admitted from their own homes. Fifty-seven percent were able to walk alone outdoors and 48% could walk without walking aids before the fracture. A hundred and fifty patients had cervical fractures and 88 trochanteric fractures. The most frequent treatment of cervical fractures was Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty (68%) and that of trochanteric fractures Gamma nail fixation (86%). At four months after the fracture, 50% lived in their own homes, 33% could walk alone out-doors and 13% could walk without any aids. Thirty-two percent had no pain in the hip. The overall mortality at four months was 17.6% and that of the operated patients 16.2%. The reoperation rate was 8.5%. Conclusion: SAHFE forms were very useful in the evaluation of the quality of the hip fracture treatment.

scholarly journals 07 Rehabilitation in Patients with Dementia Following Hip Fracture

2019 ◽  
Vol 48 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii17-iii65
Author(s):  
Cliona Small ◽  
Emma Lennon ◽  
Rebecca Low ◽  
Rachael Doyle ◽  
Shane O'Hanlon
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Admission Rates ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Diagnosis Of Dementia ◽  
The Mean ◽  
One Year ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Abstract Background Hip fractures are an increasing phenomenon in the older population. Receiving post-operative rehabilitation is associated with better outcomes and a higher likelihood of returning to preexisting level of functioning. Best rehabilitation practices for people with dementia have not been established. Methods All patients >/= 60 years old with a hip fracture admitted under the orthopaedic team between March 2016-February 2018 were reviewed. Those with a diagnosis of dementia were extracted from the database. Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Zuckermann Functional Recovery Score (FRS) and New Mobility Score (NMS) were documented at baseline and at one year. Outcomes assessed included 1 year mortality, decline FRS/NMS, change in CFS and nursing home (NH) admission rates. Results 465 patients’ hip fractures were recorded: 175 patients had dementia. 67 patients were dead at 1-year post fracture (38.285% mortality rate). Of the 108 patients with dementia who were living at 1-year; 30.5% (n=33) received offsite rehab. 58.4% (n=63) received routine in-patient rehab. 12 lost to follow-up. Of the 33 patients that received off-site rehab the mean FRS at baseline was 66 and decreased to 45.56 at 1 year (30.9% reduction). The mean CFS at baseline was 5.1, increasing to 6 at 1-year (17% increase). Mean NMS was 5.7 decreasing to 3.7 at 1-year. In those patients with dementia that did not receive off site rehab (n=63); baseline mean FRS was 38 reducing to 30 at 1 year (26.6 % reduction). Mean CFS was 6.25- increasing to 6.47 at 1 year. 41% of patients admitted from home who did not receive off-site rehab were discharged to NH. Of the group discharged to off-site rehab: at 1 year 33% were in a NH and 72% remained at home. Conclusion Both groups demonstrated decline in function. Those that received off-site rehab had higher premorbid functioning/mobility and reduced frailty. There was a reduced NH admission rate at 1-year in the group that received off-site rehab.

scholarly journals Inpatient hip fractures: understanding and addressing the risk of this common injury

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 481-486 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inderpal Singh ◽  
Kate Hooton ◽  
Chris Edwards ◽  
Beverley Lewis ◽  
Anser Anwar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Health Board ◽  
Falls Risk ◽  
Inpatient Falls ◽  
One Year ◽  
Home Placement ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Introduction The impact and outcome of hip fractures are well described for people living in the community, but inpatient hip fracture (IHF) have not been extensively studied. In this study, we examine the patient characteristics, common falls risk factors and clinical outcomes of this condition. Methods Between January 2016 and December 2017, we analysed all inpatient falls that resulted in hip fracture within Aneurin Bevan University Health Board (ABUHB) in Wales. Results The overall falls rate was 8.7/1000 occupied bed days (OBD). Over the 2 years, 118 patients sustained an IHF, giving a rate of 0.12/1000 OBD. The mean age was 81.8 ± 9.5 (range 49–97) years and 60% were women. Most patients (n = 112) were admitted from their own home. Mean Charlson Comorbidity Index and the number of medications on admission were 5.5 ± 1.9 and 8.5 ± 3.7, respectively. Fifty-three patients (45%) sustained the IHF following their first inpatient fall. Twenty-four IHF (20%) occurred within 72 h. Mean length of stay was 84.9 ± 55.8 days. Only 43% were discharged back to their original place of residence following an IHF; 27% were discharged to a care home (26 new care home discharges), and 30% died as an inpatient. One-year mortality was 54% (n = 64/118). The most common comorbidity was dementia (63%). Conclusion Mortality and need for care home placement are both much higher after IHF than following community hip fracture. Most people who suffer a hip fracture in hospital have already demonstrated their need for falls risk management by having fallen previously during the same admission.

scholarly journals COVID-19 pandemic and hip fractures: impact and lessons learned

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (9) ◽  
pp. 530-540
Author(s):  
Mohamed Arafa ◽  
Samia Nesar ◽  
Hamza Abu-Jabeh ◽  
Ma Odette Remelou Jayme ◽  
Yegappan Kalairajah
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Positive Group ◽  
Fracture Care ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Aims The coronavirus disease (COVID)-19 pandemic forced an unprecedented period of challenge to the NHS in the UK where hip fractures in the elderly population are a major public health concern. There are approximately 76,000 hip fractures in the UK each year which make up a substantial proportion of the trauma workload of an average orthopaedic unit. This study aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on hip fracture care service and the emerging lessons to withstand any future outbreaks. Methods Data were collected retrospectively on 157 hip fractures admitted from March to May 2019 and 2020. The 2020 group was further subdivided into COVID-positive and COVID-negative. Data including the four-hour target, timing to imaging, hours to operation, anaesthetic and operative details, intraoperative complications, postoperative reviews, COVID status, Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), length of stay, postoperative complications, and the 30-day mortality were compiled from computer records and our local National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) export data. Results Hip fractures and inpatient falls significantly increased by 61.7% and 7.2% respectively in the 2020 group. A significant difference was found among the three groups regarding anaesthetic preparation time, anaesthetic time, and recovery time. The mortality rate in the 2020 COVID-positive group (36.8%) was significantly higher than both the 2020 COVID-negative and 2019 groups (11.5% and 11.7% respectively). The hospital stay was significantly higher in the COVID-positive group (mean of 24.21 days (SD 19.29)). Conclusion COVID-19 has had notable effects on the hip fracture care service: hip fracture rates increased significantly. There were inefficiencies in theatre processes for which we have recommended the use of alternate theatres. COVID-19 infection increased the 30-day mortality and hospital stay in hip fractures. More research needs to be done to reduce this risk. Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-9:530–540.

scholarly journals MORTALITY AND FUNCTION AFTER SURGICALLY-TREATED HIP FRACTURE IN ADULTS YOUNGER THAN AGE 60

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 129-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babak Pourabbas ◽  
Mohammad Jafar Emami ◽  
Amir Reza Vosoughi ◽  
Hamideh Mahdaviazad ◽  
Zeinab Kargarshouroki
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Pain Severity ◽  
Walking Aids ◽  
One Year ◽  
The One

ABSTRACT Objective: Hip fractures in young adults can cause poor functional capacity throughout life because of several complications. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate 1-year mortality and functional outcomes for patients aged 60 years or younger with hip fracture . Methods: We prospectively obtained data for all consecutive patients aged 60 or younger with any type of hip fracture who were treated operatively between 2008 and 2014. After one year, patient outcomes were evaluated according to changes in pain severity, functional status (modified Barthel index), and mortality rate . Results: Of the total of 201 patients, 132 (65.7%) were men (mean age: 41.8 years) and 69 (34.3%) were women (mean age: 50.2 years) (p<0.001). Reduced pain severity was reported in 91.5% of the patients. The mean modified Barthel index was 22.3 in men and 18.6 in women (p<0.001). At the one-year follow-up, 39 cases (19.4%) were dependent on walking aids while only 17 patients (8.5%) used walking aids preoperatively (p<0.001). Seven patients (4 men and 3 women) died during the one-year follow-up period; 2 died in the hospital after surgery . Conclusion: Hip fractures in young adults have a low mortality rate, reduction in pain severity, and acceptable functional outcomes one year after surgery. Level of Evidence II, Prospective Comparative Study.

scholarly journals 67 Reducing Delays to Operative Management of Anti-Coagulated Patients With Hip Fractures

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. i18-i20
Author(s):  
J Ensanullah ◽  
B Shah ◽  
M Fertleman
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Heart Valves ◽  
Guideline Implementation ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
National Guidelines ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Surgery Timing ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Introduction In the UK, the gold-standard treatment of a hip fracture is surgical fixation within 36 hours. Reduced delay to surgery has been shown to minimise the risk of complications. Locally, frequent delays to surgery were observed in patients taking long-term anticoagulation. There are no national guidelines regarding anticoagulation reversal and surgery timing in patients with hip fractures, and doctors are often unfamiliar with increasingly prevalent Direct Oral Anti-coagulants (DOACs). This quality improvement project aimed to reduce delays to surgery in anti-coagulated patients with hip fractures. Methods A guideline was formulated following literature review and consultation with a Consultant Ortho-geriatrician, Orthopaedic Surgeon and Haematologist. Retrospective casenote audit was conducted including 3-month period before and after implementation. The new guideline was disseminated in poster form. Due to the observation that delays in receiving INR results resulted in reversal delay, patient’s on warfarin were recommended to receive 5 mg IV Vitamin K prior to receiving INR results. The INR was rechecked after 6 hours, and if less than 1.6, surgery could proceed. Those on DOACs could undergo surgery 24 hours after the last dose providing eGFR &gt;30, and after 48 hours if eGFR &lt;30. Exclusions were those anti-coagulated for metallic heart valves or recent venous thromboembolism. Results In the 3 months prior to guideline implementation, 71 patients had a hip fracture; 15 were anti-coagulated. Of these, 8 patients were delayed due to their anticoagulation. Repeat audit after implementation, included 46 patients with a hip fracture over the 3-month period; 7 were anti-coagulated. None were delayed due to anticoagulation (p &lt; 0.05). Conclusions This improvement project describes formulation of a simple protocol with evidence from the literature and local expert opinion in order to reduce unnecessary delays in anti-coagulated patients with hip fractures.

scholarly journals Identifying Disparities in the Management of Hip Fractures Within Europe: A Comparison of 3 Health-Care Systems

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 215145931987294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cliodhna E. Murray ◽  
Andreas Fuchs ◽  
Heide Grünewald ◽  
Owen Godkin ◽  
Norbert P. Südkamp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Care Systems ◽  
The Uk

Introduction: This study investigates the management of hip fractures in a German maximum care hospital and compares these data to evidence-based standard and practice in 180 hospitals participating in the UK National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) and 16 hospitals participating in the Irish Hip Fracture Database (IHFD). This is the first study directly comparing the management of hip fractures between 3 separate health-care systems within Europe. Methods: Electronic medical data were collected retrospectively describing the care pathway of elderly patients with a hip fracture admitted to a large trauma unit in the south of Germany “University Hospital Freiburg” (UHF). The audit evaluated demographics, postoperative outcome, and the adherence to the 6 “Blue Book” standards of care. These data were directly compared with the data from the UK NHFD and the IHFD acquired from 180 and 16 hospitals, respectively. Results: At 36 hours, 95.8% of patients had received surgery in UHF, compared to 71.5% in the NHFD and 58% of patients in the IHFD. The rate of in-hospital mortality was 4.7% compared to 7.1% in the NHFD and 5% in the IHFD. The mean average acute length of stay was 13.4 days compared to 16.4 days in the NHFD and 20 days in the IHFD. Reoperation rates are 3.3% compared to 1% in the NHFD and 1.1% in the IHFD; 50.5% of patients were discharged on bone protection medication, compared to 47% in the IHFD and 79.3% in the UK NHFD. Discussion: Despite uniformly acknowledged evidence-based treatment guidelines, the management of hip fractures remains heterogeneous within Europe. Conclusion: These data show that different areas of the hip fracture care pathway in Germany, England, and Ireland, respectively, show room for improvement in light of the growing socioeconomic burden these countries are expected to face.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document