scholarly journals Using Large Data to Analyze the Effect of Learning Attitude for Cooperative Learning between the High Achievement Students and the Low Achievement Students

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 293-296
Author(s):  
Hsu Chia-Ling ◽  
Chang Ya-Fung
2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timbul Purba ◽  
Harun Sitompul

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan: (1) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran elaborasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi tinggi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi rendah dan (3) interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dengan motif berprestasi dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode quasi eksperimen dengan desain penelitian faktorial 2x2, sedangkan teknik analisis data menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur pada taraf signifikansi a = 0.05. Hasil penelitian diperoleh: (1) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran elaborasi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang diajar dengan strategi pembelajaran ekspositori, (2) hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi tinggi lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan hasil belajar siswa yang memiliki motif berprestasi rendah dan (3) terdapat interaksi antara strategi pembelajaran dengan motif berprestasi dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar menggambar teknik siswa.   Kata Kunci: strategi pembelajaran elaborasi dan ekspositori, motif berprestasi, hasil belajar menggambar teknik   Abstract: This research was aimed to: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught drawing techniques with learning strategy elaboration higher than students taught by expository learning strategy, (2) drawing techniques learning outcomes of students who have high achievement motive higher than students who have low achievement motive, and (3) the interaction between learning strategy and achievement motives in affecting student learning outcomes drawing techniques. The research method used was quasi experiment with 2 x 2 factorial design. The analysis technique used is the two-track analysis of variance ANOVA (2 x 2) with a significance level α = 0.05. The findings of the study indicate: (1) the learning outcomes of students who are taught drawing techniques with learning strategy elaboration higher learning outcomes than students taught by expository learning strategy; (2) drawing techniques learning outcomes of students who have high achievement motive higher than the learning outcomes of students who have low achievement motive; and (3) there is interaction between learning strategy and achievement motives in affecting student learning outcomes drawing techniques. Keywords: elaboration learning strategies and expository, achievement motive, the result of learning drawing techniques


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 112
Author(s):  
Rosliana Siregar

This research aim to know of difference between result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study cooperative type STAD and result oflearning student mathematics by using strategy of study ekspositori. The  method isquasi experiment. This research is executed SMP Negeri 11 Medan. Instrumentused together the data  test result of learning and enquette motivate to haveachievement. Technique analysis the data used by ANAVA 2x2. The result analysisof research indicate that result learn the student mathematics taught by usingstrategy study of higher type STAD cooperative than result learn the studentmathematics taught by using strategy of study ekspositori (Fcalculate = 4,698 >Ftabel = 3,96;  there are difference which signifikan of result learn the studentmathematics having high achievement motivation with the student having lowmotivation achievement, (Fcalculate = 27,9 > Ftabel = 3,96), and there areinteraction between study strategy and motivate to have achievement in influencingresult learn the student mathematics (Fcalculate = 12,45 > Ftabel = 3,96). Result ofinferential research that strategy study of better type STAD cooperative taught tostudent having motivation  have high achievement and good study ekspositoristrategy used to student having motivation  have low achievement and there areinteraction of study strategy and motivate the to have achievement.


2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Erny Untari

The purposes of this study are to determine: (1) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who taught by cooperative learning model STAD or TPS type. (2) which one have a better mathematics achievement, students who have high, middle, or low achievement motivation. (3) is there any interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement. This study is a quasi experimental research with 2x3 factorial design. The population of this study is all students XI Grade SMA N 1 Kwadungan in academic year 2016/2017. Sampling was done by random technique. The total of sample is 28 students, with details of 14 students for class experiment one and 14 students for class experiment two. The instruments used to collect data are test of prior knowledge in mathematics, achievement motivation questionnaire and mathematics achievement test. The trial of test instrument includes content validity, difficulty level, discrimination power, and reliability. The testing of hypothesis uses two-way analysis of variance with unequal cell. The testing of hypothesis concludes that (1) Students who taught by cooperative learning model of TPS type have better mathematics achievement than students who taught by cooperative learning model of STAD type. (2) Students who have high achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have middle and low achievement motivation, also students who have middle achievement motivation have better mathematics achievement than students who have low achievement motivation. (3) There isn’t interaction between learning model and achievement motivation towards mathematics achievement.


1977 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Darryl E. Matter

This study explored the relationship between achievement motivation and economic development in a small midwestern community; specifically, the study investigates the following question: Is remaining in a community or moving away a function of congruency between individual achievement motivation and the stage of the community's development? For this community, the answer seems a qualified “yes.” When the community was “achieving,” those high school graduates with high achievement motivation tended to remain in the community; those with low achievement motivation moved away. The reverse was found when the community became stable and then declined.


2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 5139-5152
Author(s):  
Bilqis Firyal Nabilah Et al.

This research is motivated by the poor comprehension and creativity of elementary school students in science lessons. This study aimed to determine gamification's effect on improving learning outcomes in concept comprehension and creative thinking skills in students studying science. Achievement motivation is suspected of being involved as a variable that interacts with gamification in improving learning outcomes. The data analysis technique used the Multivariate Analysis test. The research subjects were 73 students in the control class and the experimental class. This research is a quasi-experimental research, with a 2x2 factorial, and pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design. The experimental class uses mixed gamification, while the control class uses content gamification. The difference between the two lies in the gamification elements used. The study results showed that 1) there was no significant difference in the learning outcomes of conceptual comprehension between groups of students who used mixed gamification and content gamification; 2) there was no significant difference in the learning outcomes of conceptual comprehension between groups of students who have high achievement motivation and low achievement motivation; 3) there was no interaction between gamification (mixed gamification and content gamification) and achievement motivation on learning outcomes comprehension the concept; 4) there was no significant difference in the learning outcomes of creative thinking between groups of students who use mixed gamification and content gamification; 5) there was no significant difference in the learning outcomes of creative thinking between groups of students who have high achievement motivation and low achievement motivation; 6) there was no interaction between gamification (mixed gamification and content gamification) and achievement motivation on learning outcomes to think creatively. Achievement motivation is not the only factor that affects the learning outcomes of concept comprehension and creative thinking. Future research is important to consider the different moderator variables from achievement motivation and other gamification elements.


e-CliniC ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petra Watuna ◽  
Max F. J. Mantik ◽  
Stefanus Gunawan

Absrtact: The learning achievement of the students is influenced by various factors. These factors could be alone or together with other factors affecting the learning process thus causing a decrease in student achievement. Anemia, particularly iron deficiency anemia, is one of the major problems faced by the students and has a negative impact on students' performance and productivity. Anemia is a condition that indicates levels of hemoglobin (Hb) lower than normal. This is caused by lack of iron necessary for the formation of hemoglobin in the blood. The state of is caused by decreasing of oxygen-carrying capacity of red blood cells. This study aimed to determine the differences in hemoglobin levels among school-age children with high achievement and low achievement. This was a cross sectional analytical study by using the average value of mid semester for mathematics and science subjects in SMP 9 Pandu. The Kruskal-Wallis test in mathematics with Asymp. value Sig 0.746 > 0.05 which meant that there was no difference in hemoglobin levels between students with high achievement and with low achievement. Physics subjects with Asymp. value Sig 0.028 < 0.05 meant that there was a difference between hemoglobin levels of students with high achievement and with low achievement. Hemoglobin level did not affect the value of mathematics but affect the value of the physics.Keywords: hemoglobin, iron deficiency, student achievementAbstrak: Capaian prestasi belajar para siswa dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor. Faktor-faktor tersebut bisa sendiri atau bersama dengan faktor lain mempengaruhi proses belajar sehingga menyebabkan penurunan prestasi siswa. Anemia, secara khusus anemia defisiensi besi adalah salah satu masalah utama yang dihadapi para siswa dan memiliki pengaruh negatif terhadap performa dan produktifitas siswa. Anemia adalah keadaan yang menunjukkan kadar hemoglobin (Hb) seseorang lebih rendah dari kadar hemoglobin normal. Hal ini disebabkan oleh kekurangan zat besi yang diperlukan untuk pembentukan hemoglobin dalam tubuh. Keadaan anemia menyebabkan kapasitas pengangkutan oksigen oleh sel darah merah menurun. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana perbedaan kadar hemoglobin antara anak usia sekolah yang berprestasi dan kurang berprestasi. Penelitian ini bersifat analitik dengan pendekatan cross sectional, dengan mengambil rata-rata nilai mid semester untuk mata pelajaran matematika dan IPA di SMP 9 Pandu. Hasil penelitian: dengan uji Kruskal-Wallis pada mata pelajaran matematika dengan nilai Asymp. Sig 0,746 > 0,05, artinya tidak terdapat perbedaan kadar hemoglobin siswa berprestasi dan tidak berprestasi. Untuk mata pelajaran IPA dengan nilai Asympt. Sig 0,028 < 0,05, artinya terdapat perbedaan antara kadar hemoglobin siswa berprestasi dan tidak berprestasi. Kadar hemoglobin tidak mempengaruhi nilai matematika tapi mempengaruhi nilai IPA.Kata kunci: hemoglobin, defisiensi besi, prestasi siswa.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document