scholarly journals Intranasal type I interferon treatment is beneficial only when administered before clinical signs onset in the SARS-CoV-2 hamster model

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
pp. e1009427
Author(s):  
Pierre Bessière ◽  
Marine Wasniewski ◽  
Evelyne Picard-Meyer ◽  
Alexandre Servat ◽  
Thomas Figueroa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Post Infection ◽  
Intranasal Administration ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hamster Model ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Recombinant Type ◽  
Ifn Treatment

Impaired type I interferons (IFNs) production or signaling have been associated with severe COVID-19, further promoting the evaluation of recombinant type I IFNs as therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the Syrian hamster model, we show that intranasal administration of IFN-α starting one day pre-infection or one day post-infection limited weight loss and decreased viral lung titers. By contrast, intranasal administration of IFN-α starting at the onset of symptoms three days post-infection had no impact on the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results provide evidence that early type I IFN treatment is beneficial, while late interventions are ineffective, although not associated with signs of enhanced disease.

scholarly journals Intranasal type I interferon treatment is beneficial only when administered before clinical signs onset in the SARS-CoV-2 hamster model

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre Bessière ◽  
Marine Wasniewski ◽  
Evelyne Picard-Meyer ◽  
Alexandre Servat ◽  
Thomas Figueroa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Post Infection ◽  
Intranasal Administration ◽  
Type I Interferon ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Interferon Treatment ◽  
Hamster Model ◽  
Critical Determinant ◽  
Recombinant Type

AbstractImpaired type I interferons (IFNs) production or signaling have been associated with severe COVID-19, further promoting the evaluation of recombinant type I IFNs as therapeutics against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In the Syrian hamster model, we show that intranasal administration of IFN-α starting one day pre-infection or one day post-infection limited weight loss and decreased viral lung titers. By contrast, intranasal administration of IFN-α starting at the onset of symptoms three days post-infection had no impact on the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our results provide evidence that early type I IFN treatments are beneficial, while late interventions are ineffective, although not associated with signs of enhanced disease.One Sentence SummaryThe timing of type I interferon treatment is a critical determinant of its efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 infection.

scholarly journals Antibodies against type-I Interferon: detection and association with severe clinical outcome in COVID-19 patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Goncalves ◽  
Mehdi Mezidi ◽  
Paul Bastard ◽  
Magali Perret ◽  
Kahina Saker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Type I Interferon ◽  
Clinical Course ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifn ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Recombinant Type ◽  
Circulating Autoantibodies

Objectives Impairment of type I interferon (IFN-I) immunity has been reported in critically ill COVID-19 patients. This defect can be explained by the presence of circulating autoantibodies against IFN-I. We set out to improve the detection and the quantification of such antibodies (Abs) in a cohort of severe Covid-19 patients, in an effort to better document the prevalence of these Abs as the pandemics evolves and how they correlate with the clinical course of the disease. Methods Anti-IFN-a Abs was investigated 84 critical COVID-19 patients who were admitted to ICU at the Lyon University Hospital, France with a commercially available kit (Thermo-Fisher). Results Twenty-one patients out of 84 (25%) had anti-IFNa2 Ab above cut-off (>34ng/mL) in sera. A neutralizing activity against IFN-a2 was evidenced in 15 of them, suggesting that 18% of patients were positive for neutralizing anti-IFN-a and -w auto-Abs. In addition, in most of patients with neutralizing IFN-I Abs, we noticed an impairment of the IFN-I response. However, we did not find any difference in terms of clinical characteristics or outcome between critical COVID-19 patients with or without neutralizing anti-IFN-a2 auto-Abs in these conditions. Finally, we detected anti-type I IFN auto-Abs in sera of COVID-19 patients were detected throughout the ICU stay. Conclusions We report that 18% of severe COVID-19 patients were positive for these Anti-Type-I IFN Abs, confirming the detrimental role of these Abs on the antiviral response. Our results further support the use of recombinant type I IFNs not targeted by the auto-Abs (e.g., IFN-b) in COVID-19 patients with an impaired IFN-I response.

scholarly journals AB0042 CYTOKINE NETWORK ELUCIDATED BY THE QUANTIFICATION OF MULTIPLE CYTOKINES IN THE SERUM SEQUENTIALLY SAMPLED FROM RA PATIENTS WHO WERE TREATED WITH BIOLOGIC DMARDS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1323.2-1324
Author(s):  
K. Sato ◽  
S. Mamada ◽  
C. Hayashi ◽  
T. Nagashima ◽  
S. Minota
Keyword(s):  
Bone Erosion ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Serum Samples ◽  
Cytokine Network ◽  
Biologic Dmards ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Before And After

Background:Biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have demonstrated that proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL-) 6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) play important roles in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Other cytokines, such as type I interferons (IFNs), are also implicated in its pathogenesis (ref 1). However, the complete picture of the cytokine network involved in RA remains to be elucidated.Objectives:By quantifying sets of cytokines in the serum of RA patients before and after treatment with various biologic DMARDs, we sought to determine the effects of drugs on (A) type I IFNs, (B) soluble IL-6 receptors, and (C) other cytokines.Methods:52 patients with RA were treated with various biologic DMARDs (tocilizumab (TOC): 16, abatacept (ABT): 15, and TNF inhibitors (TNFi): 21). Serum samples were obtained (1) before, (2) approximately 4 weeks after (3) and approximately 12 weeks after the initiation of treatment. A suspension bead-array system was used for analysis; Bio-Plex Human Cytokine 17-plex Assay kits and Express Custom Panels (Bio-Rad), including IFN-β, IFN-α2, soluble IL-6 receptor α (sIL6Rα) and gp130 were used.Results:(1) As expected, the disease activity score 28-joiny count (DAS28) using the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) significantly decreased in all three groups (TOC, ABT and TNFi) by 12 weeks.(2) IFN-α2 was barely detected in the serum samples. IFN-β seemed to increase slightly in the ABT group, but the increase was not statistically significant.(3) The levels of sIL6Rα did not change substantially. Those of gp130 decreased slightly but significantly in the TOC group by 12 weeks.(4) The levels of IL-6 decreased significantly in the ABT group by 12 weeks. Those in the TNFi group decreased significantly at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks (Fig. 1A).(5) The levels of IL-7 decreased significantly only in the TOC group (Fig. 1B).Conclusion:(1) The biologic DMARDs tested in this study did not significantly affect the serum levels of type I IFNs in this study.(2) The decrease in gp130 in the TOC group may imply that gp130 is induced by IL-6, although whether this level of decrease has physiological significance is open to question.(3) Serum IL-6 was significantly decreased in the TNFi group at 4 weeks but not 12 weeks. TNF has been reported to induce IL-6 (ref 2), but negative feedback loop(s) may be present. Such a feedback system might make the discontinuation of TNFi difficult, even if patients are in remission.(4) IL-7 may be a target of IL-6. A higher level of IL-7 has been reported to be present in the joints of RA patients compared with osteoarthrosis and it is a cytokine implicated in the differentiation of osteoclasts (ref 3). This may partly explain the effect of TOC on preventing bone erosion in RA.References:[1]Ann Rheum Dis. 2007; 66: 1008–14[2]Rheumatology 2007; 46: 920-6[3]Rheumatology 2008; 47: 753-9Acknowledgments:We thank all the members of the Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University. We are also grateful to the patients involved in this study.Disclosure of Interests:Kojiro Sato Grant/research support from: Abbie, Pfizer, Chugai, Astellas, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Ono, Takeda, Sachiko Mamada: None declared, Chiyomi Hayashi: None declared, Takao Nagashima: None declared, Seiji Minota: None declared

scholarly journals Activation of Stimulator of Interferon Genes (STING) and Sjögren Syndrome

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 893-900 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Papinska ◽  
H. Bagavant ◽  
G.B. Gmyrek ◽  
M. Sroka ◽  
S. Tummala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Autoimmune Disorder ◽  
Sjögren Syndrome ◽  
Lymphoid Cells ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Sjogren Syndrome ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifns

Sjögren syndrome (SS), a chronic autoimmune disorder causing dry mouth, adversely affects the overall oral health in patients. Activation of innate immune responses and excessive production of type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of this disorder. Recognition of nucleic acids by cytosolic nucleic acid sensors is a major trigger for the induction of type I IFNs. Upon activation, cytosolic DNA sensors can interact with the stimulator of interferon genes (STING) protein, and activation of STING causes increased expression of type I IFNs. The role of STING activation in SS is not known. In this study, to investigate whether the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway influences SS development, female C57BL/6 mice were injected with a STING agonist, dimethylxanthenone-4-acetic acid (DMXAA). Salivary glands (SGs) were studied for gene expression and inflammatory cell infiltration. SG function was evaluated by measuring pilocarpine-induced salivation. Sera were analyzed for cytokines and autoantibodies. Primary SG cells were used to study the expression and activation of STING. Our data show that systemic DMXAA treatment rapidly induced the expression of Ifnb1, Il6, and Tnfa in the SGs, and these cytokines were also elevated in circulation. In contrast, increased Ifng gene expression was dominantly detected in the SGs. The type I innate lymphoid cells present within the SGs were the major source of IFN-γ, and their numbers increased significantly within 3 d of treatment. STING expression in SGs was mainly observed in ductal and interstitial cells. In primary SG cells, DMXAA activated STING and induced IFN-β production. The DMXAA-treated mice developed autoantibodies, sialoadenitis, and glandular hypofunction. Our study demonstrates that activation of the STING pathway holds the potential to initiate SS. Thus, apart from viral infections, conditions that cause cellular perturbations and accumulation of host DNA within the cytosol should also be considered as possible triggers for SS.

scholarly journals Type I interferons act directly on nociceptors to produce pain sensitization: Implications for viral infection-induced pain

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paulino Barragan-Iglesias ◽  
Úrzula Franco-Enzástiga ◽  
Vivekanand Jeevakumar ◽  
Andi Wangzhou ◽  
Vinicio Granados-Soto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infection ◽  
Viral Infections ◽  
Mrna Translation ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Poly I:C ◽  
Type I ◽  
Drg Neurons ◽  
Pain Hypersensitivity ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Pain Sensitization

ABSTRACTOne of the first signs of viral infection is body-wide aches and pain. While this type of pain usually subsides, at the extreme, viral infections can induce painful neuropathies that can last for decades. Neither of these types of pain sensitization are well understood. A key part of the response to viral infection is production of interferons (IFNs), which then activate their specific receptors (IFNRs) resulting in downstream activation of cellular signaling and a variety of physiological responses. We sought to understand how type I IFNs (IFN-α and IFN-β) might act directly on nociceptors in the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) to cause pain sensitization. We demonstrate that type I IFNRs are expressed in small/medium DRG neurons and that their activation produces neuronal hyper-excitability and mechanical pain in mice. Type I IFNs stimulate JAK/STAT signaling in DRG neurons but this does not apparently result in PKR-eIF2α activation that normally induces an anti-viral response by limiting mRNA translation. Rather, type I interferons stimulate MNK-mediated eIF4E phosphorylation in DRG neurons to promote pain hypersensitivity. Endogenous release of type I IFNs with the double stranded RNA mimetic poly(I:C) likewise produces pain hypersensitivity that is blunted in mice lacking MNK-eIF4E signaling. Our findings reveal mechanisms through which type I IFNs cause nociceptor sensitization with implications for understanding how viral infections promote pain and can lead to neuropathies.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTIt is increasingly understood that pathogens interact with nociceptors to alert organisms to infection as well as to mount early host defenses. While specific mechanisms have been discovered for diverse bacteria and fungal pathogens, mechanisms engaged by viruses have remained elusive. Here we show that type 1 interferons, one of the first mediators produced by viral infection, act directly on nociceptors to produce pain sensitization. Type I interferons act via a specific signaling pathway (MNK-eIF4E signaling) that is known to produce nociceptor sensitization in inflammatory and neuropathic pain conditions. Our work reveals a mechanism through which viral infections cause heightened pain sensitivity

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2 infection in the Syrian hamster model causes inflammation as well as type I interferon dysregulation in both respiratory and non-respiratory tissues including the heart and kidney

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Magen E. Francis ◽  
Una Goncin ◽  
Andrea Kroeker ◽  
Cynthia Swan ◽  
Robyn Ralph ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type I Interferon ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Host Responses ◽  
Type I ◽  
Hamster Model ◽  
Organ Systems ◽  
Major Organ ◽  
Kidney Liver ◽  
Multiorgan Disease

AbstractCOVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) caused SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2) infection is a disease affecting several organ systems. A model that captures all clinical symptoms of COVID-19 as well as long-haulers disease is needed. We investigated the host responses associated with infection in several major organ systems including the respiratory tract, the heart, and the kidneys after SARS-CoV-2 infection in Syrian hamsters. We found significant increases in inflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1beta, and TNF) and type II interferons whereas type I interferons were inhibited. Examination of extrapulmonary tissue indicated inflammation in the kidney, liver, and heart which also lacked type I interferon upregulation. Histologically, the heart had evidence of mycarditis and microthrombi while the kidney had tubular inflammation. These results give insight into the multiorgan disease experienced by people with COVID-19 and possibly the prolonged disease in people with post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC).

Adjuvant activity of type I interferons

2008 ◽  
Vol 389 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael G. Tovey ◽  
Christophe Lallemand ◽  
George Thyphronitis
Keyword(s):  
Immune Response ◽  
Antibody Response ◽  
Antigen Presentation ◽  
Response Characteristic ◽  
Influenza Virus Vaccine ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Adjuvant Activity ◽  
Virus Challenge ◽  
Type I Ifns

AbstractType I interferons (IFNs) produced primarily by plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) as part of the innate immune response to infectious agents induce the maturation of myeloid DCs and enhance antigen presentation. Type I IFNs also enhance apoptosis of virus-infected cells, stimulate cross priming and enhanced presentation of viral peptides. Type I IFNs are powerful polyclonal B-cell activators that induce a strong primary humoral immune response characterized by isotype switching and protection against virus challenge. Type I IFNs stimulate an IgG2a antibody response characteristic of Th1 immunity when ad-mixed with influenza virus vaccine and injected intramuscurarly (i.m.) or administered intranasally. The adjuvant activity of type I IFNs has been shown to involve direct effects of IFN on B-cells, effects on T-cells, as well as effects on antigen presentation. Oromucosal administration of type I IFNs concomitantly with i.m. injection of vaccine alone can also enhance the antibody response to influenza vaccination by enhancing trafficking of antigen-presenting cells towards the site of vaccination. Recombinant IFNs are potent adjuvants that may find application in both parenterally and mucosally administered vaccines.

Differential expression and activity of the porcine type I interferon family

2010 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 248-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongming Sang ◽  
Raymond R. R. Rowland ◽  
Richard A. Hesse ◽  
Frank Blecha
Keyword(s):  
Antiviral Activity ◽  
Expression Profiles ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Respiratory Syndrome Virus ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Type I ◽  
Antiviral Responses ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Antiviral Activities ◽  
Vesicular Stomatitis

Type I interferons (IFNs) are central to innate and adaptive immunity, and many have unique developmental and physiological functions. However, in most species, only two subtypes, IFN-α and IFN-β, have been well studied. Because of the increasing importance of zoonotic viral diseases and the use of pigs to address human research questions, it is important to know the complete repertoire and activity of porcine type I IFNs. Here we show that porcine type I IFNs comprise at least 39 functional genes distributed along draft genomic sequences of chromosomes 1 and 10. These functional IFN genes are classified into 17 IFN-α subtypes, 11 IFN-δ subtypes, 7 IFN-ω subtypes, and single-subtype subclasses of IFN-αω, IFN-β, IFN-ε, and IFN-κ. We found that porcine type I IFNs have diverse expression profiles and antiviral activities against porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV), with activity ranging from 0 to >105 U·ng−1·ml−1. Whereas most IFN-α subtypes retained the greatest antiviral activity against both PRRSV and VSV in porcine and MARC-145 cells, some IFN-δ and IFN-ω subtypes, IFN-β, and IFN-αω differed in their antiviral activity based on target cells and viruses. Several IFNs, including IFN-α7/11, IFN-δ2/7, and IFN-ω4, exhibited minimal or no antiviral activity in the tested target cell-virus systems. Thus comparative studies showed that antiviral activity of porcine type I IFNs is virus- and cell-dependent, and IFN-αs are positively correlated with induction of MxA, an IFN-stimulated gene. Collectively, these data provide fundamental genomic information for porcine type I IFNs, information that is necessary for understanding porcine physiological and antiviral responses.

scholarly journals Context Is Key: Delineating the Unique Functions of IFNα and IFNβ in Disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsey E. Fox ◽  
Marissa C. Locke ◽  
Deborah J. Lenschow
Keyword(s):  
Viral Infections ◽  
Biological Activities ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Type I ◽  
Disease States ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Individual Type ◽  
Effector Cytokines ◽  
The Individual

Type I interferons (IFNs) are critical effector cytokines of the immune system and were originally known for their important role in protecting against viral infections; however, they have more recently been shown to play protective or detrimental roles in many disease states. Type I IFNs consist of IFNα, IFNβ, IFNϵ, IFNκ, IFNω, and a few others, and they all signal through a shared receptor to exert a wide range of biological activities, including antiviral, antiproliferative, proapoptotic, and immunomodulatory effects. Though the individual type I IFN subtypes possess overlapping functions, there is growing appreciation that they also have unique properties. In this review, we summarize some of the mechanisms underlying differential expression of and signaling by type I IFNs, and we discuss examples of differential functions of IFNα and IFNβ in models of infectious disease, cancer, and autoimmunity.

Inhibition of Angiogenesis by Type I Interferons in Models of Kaposi'S Sarcoma

1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 257-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Marchisone ◽  
R. Benelli ◽  
A. Albini ◽  
L. Santi ◽  
D. M. Noonan
Keyword(s):  
Kaposi's Sarcoma ◽  
Kaposi’S Sarcoma ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Type I Interferons ◽  
Endothelial Cell Migration ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type I Ifns ◽  
Hiv 1

Kaposi's Sarcoma (KS) is a pathology which occurs with increased frequency and in a particularly aggressive form in AIDS patients. The HIV-1 Tat protein appears to be an important co-factor in the induction of the extensive neo-vascularization associated with AIDS-KS. Tat acts as a chemoattractant for endothelial cells in vitro, inducing both chemotactic and invasive responses. Several clinical trials have been performed testing the effectiveness of diverse biological agents in therapy of KS, among these the type I interferons. Type I IFNs have diverse biological functions besides their anti-viral activity, including anti-angiogenic properties. We have shown that IFNα and IFNβ are potent inhibitors of both primary and immortalized endothelial cell migration and morphogenesis in vitro as well as neo-angiogenesis induced by HIV-1 Tat in vivo. The inhibitory effect of IFN class I on HIV-Tat associated angiogenesis further supports its use as a therapy for epidemic Kaposi's sarcoma. The use of recombinant IFNs at the levels required to obtain a therapeutic effect are associated with side effects and toxicity, therefore we are now developing a gene therapy approach for constant and local delivery type I IFNs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document