scholarly journals The urgent need for modification of scientific ranking indexes to facilitate scientific progress and diminish academic bullying

Bioimpacts ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Morteza Mahmoudi ◽  
Saya Ameli ◽  
Sherry Moss

Academic bullying occurs when senior scientists direct abusive behavior such as verbal insults, public shaming, isolation, and threatening toward vulnerable junior colleagues such as postdocs, graduate students and lab members. We believe that one root cause of bullying behavior is the pressure felt by scientists to compete for rankings designed to measure their scientific worth. These ratings, such as the h-index, have several unintended consequences, one of which we believe is academic bullying. Under pressure to achieve higher and higher rankings, in exchange for positive evaluations, grants and recognition, senior scientists exert undue pressure on their junior staff in the form of bullying. Lab members have little or no recourse due to the lack of fair institutional protocols for investigating bullying, dependence on grant or institutional funding, fear of losing time and empirical work by changing labs, and vulnerability to visa cancellation threats among international students. We call for institutions to reconsider their dependence on these over-simplified surrogates for real scientific progress and to provide fair and just protocols that will protect targets of academic bullying from emotional and financial distress.

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil Sharma ◽  
Anuradha R Chetiya

The success of a Six Sigma programme in an organization depends to a large extent on the success of the Six Sigma projects, which in turn depends on how the team handles the problem and whether the right combination of tools is being applied to address the root cause. The Six Sigma toolbox consists of a wide range of tools comprising, on the one hand, simple and commonly used tools like flow charts, Pareto analysis, and cause-and-effect diagram and the more advanced statistical tools like design of experiments, regression analysis and many more, on the other hand. While the simple tools are easy to apply, understand, and analyse, engineers perceive the more advanced tools difficult to comprehend. Design of experiments (DOE) is one such tool. Two well-known approaches of design of experiments are the Classical DOE, pioneered by Sir Ronald A Fisher and the Taguchi approach, pioneered by Dr Genichii Taguchi. A third approach to experimental design—the Shainin DOE techniques, offered by Dr Dorian Shainin—can be considered as a very good alternative to the other approaches. They are much simpler than the factorial designs, response surface designs, and orthogonal arrays of the conventional approaches of DOE, but at the same time are recognized as being very powerful and effective in solving the chronic quality problems that plague most manufacturers. Shainin DOE basically works at eliminating suspected process variables by mostly using seven different tools, viz., Multi-Vari Charts Component Search Paired Comparison Variable Search Full Factorials B vs. C (Better vs. Current) Analysis Scatter Plots or Realistic Tolerance Parallelogram Plots. Though not very well documented, these tools have proved to be the key drivers in the success of many companies, e.g., Motorola. This article examines two projects of a leading automotive and general lighting lamp manufacturing company, in which a combination of the standard Six Sigma tools and Shainin tools has been successfully used to address the root cause of the problems. The advantage of using Shainin tools is that: Very small sample sizes are required to analyse the problem. Often samples as small as 2 or 3 are enough to make statistically valid conclusions. Statistical software is not required to analyse the data. In fact, Shainin DOE does not even require knowledge of complex statistical tools. It involves employees at all levels, including workers and junior staff in problem solving that was hitherto a domain of senior technical experts. Also, the success of the projects had a very positive effect on the morale of the employees in terms of convincing them that Six Sigma is not all about using complex statistical tools.


2021 ◽  
pp. 095042222110162
Author(s):  
Linda Anne Barkas ◽  
Paul-Alan Armstrong

Through the examination of knowledge artefacts, utilising an analytical metaphorical representation, the authors present an exploration of higher education. In this way, the exploration is depicted as a schizophrenic, dichotomic journey through the difficult discourse of knowledge, wisdom, and employability in higher education institutions. The article explores how the place and value of knowledge appear fractured in the higher education curriculum. Applying Root Cause Analysis, it is argued that the marketisation, commercialisation and commodification of higher education, with the resulting emphasis on economic value through the employability of graduates, has created unintended consequences in the sector. To insert employability initiatives, something has to give in the module structure so that everything can be fitted in. That ‘something’ is the sacrifice of wisdom within the deeper knowledge of a subject. The authors argue that the depth of knowledge has unintentionally been negatively affected by embedding employability. While some students position themselves strategically to use their education for their individual gain, others want to learn more deeply, and become anxious that they do not have the time to reflect on what they have learned. It is recommended that a deeper reflexive conversation must take place between all stakeholders in higher education if it is to have a future in economic terms.


2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
◽  

Abstract Australia, Italy, France, California, Germany and several US states have new mandatory vaccination regimes. Contemporary vaccine mandates include more vaccines, more consequences for non-vaccinators, more enforcement sites, and less exemptions. Policymakers and scholars alike face pressing questions regarding the development, effectiveness, politics and unintended consequences of new mandates. Dr Attwell, co-convenor, currently leads this nascent field in conceptual, theoretical and empirical work through a major Australian-government funded research project. She presents an overview of her work and methodologies in the workshop's Introduction. By convening a session with top international scholars, we disseminate key research findings in a forum ideally suited for interaction between presenters and attendees, establishing a global research network to consider the questions outlined above. We forge and facilitate new collaborations with attending scholars and key actors in global vaccination policy to fill research gaps. We also give policymakers a clear sense of the global field, including what requires consideration when contemplating or designing vaccine mandates. Initial inquiries indicate high levels of interest from individuals and organisations planning to attend the World Congress (or would attend to participate in our workshop). These include UNICEF and scholars from Europe, Australasia and North America, in addition to our multi-continental presenters. We will heavily promote the workshop within our extensive professional networks, as well as within WHO, the Vaccination Acceptance Research Network, the Fondation Merieux, and industry. We anticipate great interest from these organisations, most of which are familiar with our work. The five presentations include empirical work at various stages of the policy cycle, and global overviews of mandatory policies. They will be presented back-to-back, followed by an extended audience Q&A and discussion moderated by co-convenor Dr Paul. Attwell and Rizzi consider policy development in Italy, exploring conflictual aspects of policy transfer, to foster understanding of the dynamics in multilevel states. Continuing the development focus, Deml considers the politics of mandates-crafting and the ambiguity emerging from imprecise language in Switzerland. Danchin picks up at the evaluative end of the policy cycle, considering whether Australia's mandatory policies have changed parents' behaviour. These three focused presentations are augmented by macro-level analyses. MacDonald analyses data from a WHO study, teasing out target groups, consequences and exemptions, and demonstrating patterns of global coverage. Vanderslott reviews 149 countries, drawing out the unintended consequence of developing countries using vaccine mandates when supply and access problems underpin sub-optimal coverage. The mix of macro and micro levels of analysis will allow the workshop to illuminate new areas for study. Key messages The mandatory vaccination workshop coheres an international field of scholars, disseminating knowledge and identify synergies and research gaps in an emerging area of public health governance. Attendees gain a ‘state of the art’ picture of mandatory vaccination policies globally, including significant issues to consider and impacts of these policies, which can guide policy development.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Sahin

Various quantitative and qualitative metrics have been developed for assessing journals, individual researchers and articles, mainly based on the number of published items and their citations, such as Impact Factor, h-index, Eigenfactor, Cited Half-Life, etc. The reason of developing various assessment measures may be based on two grounds: scientific and commercial. Either one has its own merits to serve the scientific community in particular and the whole public in general. The search for refining the existing metrics and/or developing new ones will continue to better serve the needs.Scientific inquiry leads to the generation of scientific knowledge. The common way of sharing and dissemination of this outcome is to publish in scientific journals. The accumulation of scientific knowledge is accepted as a sign of scientific progress. This accumulation occurs in a chain relation through citing previously published associated papers in a newly published paper. This citation chain is a forward propagation of knowledge accumulation. The fusion of the knowledge is expected to lead the progress towards new questions and inquiries in this endless effort of scientific research.In this study a new metric named Impact Order (IO) is proposed. Citations play a major role to determine the Impact Order as in other assessing metrics. The Impact Order backtracks the papers through their citations from the current paper towards the seeding paper, which contains the original research question and investigation. The Impact Order of a paper in this citation chain is the number of papers citing the concerned paper without braking the chain. Hence, the Impact Order of a paper is a metric measuring the number of papers (scientific inquiries) that have been impacted (or led) by that paper. The Impact Order of a paper is an indicator to assess the quality of a paper by measuring the number of papers inspired by that paper and also by measuring the life-cycle of the concerned paper through its citation chain.


2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 3-30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark Gertler ◽  
Simon Gilchrist

At the onset of the recent global financial crisis, the workhorse macroeconomic models assumed frictionless financial markets. These frameworks were thus not able to anticipate the crisis, nor to analyze how the disruption of credit markets changed what initially appeared like a mild downturn into the Great Recession. Since that time, an explosion of both theoretical and empirical research has investigated how the financial crisis emerged and how it was transmitted to the real sector. The goal of this paper is to describe what we have learned from this new research and how it can be used to understand what happened during the Great Recession. In the process, we also present some new empirical work. We argue that a complete description of the Great Recession must take account of the financial distress facing both households and banks and, as the crisis unfolded, nonfinancial firms as well. Exploiting both panel data and time series methods, we analyze the contribution of the house price decline, versus the banking distress indicator, to the overall decline in employment during the Great Recession. We confirm a common finding in the literature that the household balance sheet channel is important for regional variation in employment. However, we also find that the disruption in banking was central to the overall employment contraction.


2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 318-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Gold ◽  
Pasi Heikkurinen

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to focus on the research question of how stakeholder claims for transparency work as a means to support responsibility in the international supply chain. Design/methodology/approach This theoretical study analyses the relationship between stakeholder claims for corporate transparency and responsible business in the global context, and develops a conceptual model for further theoretical and empirical work. Findings The study finds that the call for corporate transparency is insufficient as a means to increase responsibility within international supply chains. The erroneous belief that stakeholder claims for transparency will lead to responsible behaviour is identified as the “transparency fallacy”. The fallacy emerges from the denial of opacity in organisations and the blindness to the conditions of international supply chains (including complexity, distance, and resistance) that work against attempts to increase transparency. Research limitations/implications Acknowledging the limits of the transparency mechanism in both management theory and practice is necessary in order to advance responsible business in the international arena. Being conceptual in nature, the generic limitations of the type of research apply. Practical implications While acknowledging opacity, corporate managers and stakeholders should focus on changing the supply chain conditions to support responsible behaviour. This includes reducing complexity, distance, and resistance in the supply network. Originality/value This study contests the commonly assumed link between corporate transparency and responsibility, and sheds light on the limits and unintended consequences of stakeholder attempts to impose transparency on business organisations.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pippa McDermid ◽  
Adam Craig ◽  
Meru Sheel ◽  
Katrina Blazek ◽  
Siobhan Talty ◽  
...  

Objective: With the easing of COVID-19-related international travel restrictions in late 2021 it is time to consider the direct and indirect social, emotional, and financial impacts that these border closures have had. The study aims to evaluate the psychological and financial distress reported by people stranded abroad due to international travel restrictions introduced in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Between July and September 2021, we implemented a cross-sectional online survey targeting individuals stranded abroad due to international travel restrictions. The survey collected data about COVID-19 travel restriction-related travel impacts; personal stress, anxiety, and depression (using the validated DASS-21tool); as well as impacts on housing and financial security; and demographic data. Findings: We had 1054 participants complete the survey; most were trying to return to the Oceania region (75.4%), with 45% stranded in Europe. Overall, 64.2% reported financial distress while stranded abroad. 64.4% (x̄ =9.43, SD=5.81) reported either a moderate or severe (based on the DASS-21 classification) level of depression, 41.7% for anxiety (x̄ =5.46, SD=4.74), and 58.1% for stress (x̄ =10.64, SD=5.26). Statistically significant factors associated with moderate to extremely severe depression, anxiety, and stress were financial stress, an employment change, being <30yrs, having a high perceived risk of contracting COVID-19 abroad and being stranded for >2 months. Conclusion: The study is among the first to explore the psychological and financial distress-related impacts associated with being stranded abroad due to COVID-19 travel restrictions. It highlights a range of unintended consequences that arise from pandemic-related travel restriction, identifies the health and social needs for a particularly vulnerable population, and provides clues as to the types of support that may be adopted to best support them. This research will assist policymakers in identifying support packages for people stranded abroad due to global disaster.


2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-23
Author(s):  
Vandana Gupta

This paper attempts to evaluate the predictive ability of three default prediction models: the market-based KMV model, the Z-score model using discriminant analysis (DA), and the logit model; and identifies the key default drivers. The research extends prior empirical work by modeling and testing the impact of financial ratios, macro-economic factors, corporate governance and firm-specific variables in predicting default. For the market-based model, the author has extended the works of KMV in developing a suitable algorithm for determining probability of default (PD). While for the KMV model, the continuous observations of PD are used as the dependent variable, for the accounting-based models, ratings assigned are the proxy for default (those rated ’D’ are defaulted and rated ‘AAA’ and ‘A’ are solvent). The research findings largely support the hypothesis that solvency, profitability and liquidity ratios do impact the default risk, but adding other covariates improves the predictive ability of the models. Through this study, the author recommends that accounting –based models and market based models are conceptually different. While market-based models are forward looking and inclusion of market data makes the default risk quantifiable; to make the PD more exhaustive, it is important to factor in the information provided in the financial statements. The conclusions drawn are that the disclosures in financial statements can help predict default risk as financial distress risk is likely to evolve over time and will be reflected in financial statements beyond accounting ratios. Moreover this will also help divulge “creative accounting” practices by corporates.


2019 ◽  
Vol 49 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammadali Zolfagharian ◽  
Iman Naderi

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to extend the current understanding of human resource management (HRM) challenges facing franchise businesses. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative investigation, including eight in-depth interviews and 66 semi-structured interviews with various franchise stakeholders as well as 42 participant observations, was conducted in North America to answer the research questions. Findings Six major conclusions emerged from the conceptual and empirical work. The findings, for instance, reveal that human resources in franchise businesses lacks in motivation and skills, and franchisees’ distance from the ideal mix of autonomy and risk-aversion determines psychological and financial distress in the system. Practical implications The findings suggest that when firms choose the franchising path as a means of leapfrogging resource constraints, they will experience new and more challenging HRM complications for several reasons. Therefore, decision-makers at both franchisor and franchisee firms need to address these new HRM challenges proactively by recognizing their possibility and emergence and by engaging in cooperative learning with one another. Originality/value While HRM practices can “make or break” franchise systems, some important research questions still remain unanswered in this context. In an attempt to narrow this gap, and using a qualitative approach, this work identifies and classifies the key HRM challenges facing the franchise industry. Based on the finding, a conceptual model is proposed and discussed.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Krüger ◽  
Barbara Caspers ◽  
Nayden Chakarov ◽  
Alkistis Elliott-Graves ◽  
Marie Jolanda Kaiser ◽  
...  

Individuals differ. This seemingly trivial statement has nevertheless led to paradigm shifts, as three different fields of organismal biology have seen a marked change in key concepts over the past few decades. In animal behaviour, it has increasingly been realised that behavioural differences among individuals can be stable over time and across contexts, giving rise to the concept of animal personalities. In ecology, an increasing focus is likewise on the considerable variation in the ecological niche realised by species, populations, and individuals, giving rise to the concept of niche specialisation or individual niche variation. In evolutionary biology, where individual variation has always been central, there is an increasing awareness of the complexity with which individuals interact with the environment in producing unique phenotypes. Recent theoretical and empirical work has highlighted that the fitness landscape is rather complex, with multiple fitness peaks. It depends on the individual with its genotype, in interaction with its specific environment, which local or global fitness peak is attainable. Over the past 15 years, the need for more integrated conceptual frameworks transcending disciplines has been voiced ever more strongly. Whereas initially the ecological time scale was deemed to be fundamentally different from the evolutionary one, this notion has recently been replaced by a more integrative one, where evolution can indeed happen over ecological time scales. While in each of the three fields behaviour, ecology, and evolution, the concept of individualisation has contributed to major scientific progress, sufficient cross-fertilisation is lacking. Here, we propose a new level of conceptual unification: the individualised niche. By merging the niche concept with the fitness and animal personality concepts, new explanatory power for both ecological and evolutionary processes emerges.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document