scholarly journals Особенности организационной структуры в интеграционных группах на постсоветском пространстве

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 31-44
Author(s):  
Monika Fiedorczuk ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Research Methodology ◽  
Organizational Structures ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Article Analysis ◽  
Independent States ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Former Ussr

Goal – the main goal of the paper is to compare the institutional structure of the Commonwealth of Independent States, Eurasian Economic Union and the Union State of Belarus and Russia. Research methodology – general scientific dialectical methods of cognition have been used in the article: analysis, synthesis, and deduction. The paper uses the analysis of legal acts of selected integration groups. Score/results – the author concluded that analysed groups have very different organizational structures. The Eurasian Economic Union has the simplest and most effective structure, which is helpful in achieving further steps in economic integration. Originality/value – the article is a comparative study of organizational structures in integration groups in the former USSR and contains author’s generalizations and conclusions. The paper is original, not previously published.

scholarly journals Interaction of the Eurasian Economic Union and its member states in the sphere of agriculture

2021 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 491-501
Author(s):  
Mark Entin ◽  
Dmitriy Galushko
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Agricultural Sector ◽  
International Experience ◽  
Institutional Structure ◽  
Member States ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Economic Union

The aim of the paper is to consider the international experience of delineating spheres of responsibility of national and supranational regulators in the sphere of agriculture on the example of the Eurasian Economic Union. Used philosophical, general scientific and special methods helped to provide an assessment of the process, which shows that, due to the incompleteness of the process of economic integration, the existing institutional structure of the Union cannot be considered as finalized, and therefore the assignment of certain powers to the Union's bodies is situational, which prevents the formulation of final conclusions on the specifics of delimiting the spheres of responsibility of national and supranational regulators and the boundaries of powers of national regulators in the agricultural sector. The authors concluded that Eurasian Economic Commission's powers and competence in the sphere of agriculture should be expanded in order to achieve aims of the integration entity.

scholarly journals From the Belovezhskiye Agreements to the Eurasian Economic Union: 30 Years of Experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
M. I. Krotov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Security Treaty ◽  
Independent States ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
European Projects ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Cis Countries ◽  
Post Soviet Space

The article examines the reasons for the collapse of the USSR and the signing of the Belovezhskiye Agreements. The thirty-year experience of Eurasian integration in the post-Soviet space is summarized. There is an analysis of role of the Commonwealth of Independent States in the processes of regional economic integration carried out in the last decade of 20th century, in the context of the separation of the post-Soviet republics. It is shown that the members which are states of the Eurasian Economic Union and the Collective Security Treaty Organization fully fulfill the obligations assumed within the framework of the Belovezhskaya Agreements upon secession from the USSR. The article reveals the objective conditionality of the participation of the CIS countries in anti-Russian, pseudo-European projects by a policy of different directions. New economic priorities of Eurasian integration, institutional problems and prospects of the Eurasian Economic Union are investigated.

The Commonwealth of Independent States and the Eurasian Economic Union

2020 ◽  
pp. 116-136
Author(s):  
Frank Schimmelfennig ◽  
Thomas Winzen ◽  
Tobias Lenz ◽  
Jofre Rocabert ◽  
Loriana Crasnic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
International Organizations ◽  
General Purpose ◽  
Political Union ◽  
Commonwealth Of Independent States ◽  
International Diffusion ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Independent States ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Newly Independent States

This chapter examines two Eurasian international organizations in comparison, the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and the more recent Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), a project of more advanced economic integration. It starts with the puzzling observation that the CIS established an IPI, whereas the EAEU did not, in spite of higher authority. The CIS International Parliamentary Assembly is best explained by international diffusion, as an attempt to strengthen the international legitimacy of newly independent states. By contrast, international diffusion backfired in the EAEU case. The adoption of the European Parliament model in the Russian proposal for a Eurasian Parliament was opposed by the smaller member states, who feared that it would put EAEU on a track towards a general-purpose international organization, which would undermine their sovereignty in a Russia-dominated political union.

The role of standardization as a key Tool of Quality Economics in the development of integration of the Eurasian Economic Union

2019 ◽  
pp. 14-19
Author(s):  
V. V. Okrepilov ◽  
A. G. Gridasov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
International Standards ◽  
Member States ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Goods And Services ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Union

The presented study examines the experience of forming a regulatory framework for the integration of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) member states through the example of standardization as one of the key tools of quality economics.Aim. The study analyzes the major solutions of the EAEU authorities and member countries aimed at increasing the role of standardization in the economic integration of the Union over five years of its existence.Tasks. The authors identify efficient methods for developing standardization for the integration of the EAEU states as well as the most problematic aspects in this field that need to be taken into account in the qualitative strengthening of the Union’s economy.Methods. This study uses general scientific methods of cognition to examine the activities of the EAEU authorities and member states aimed at creating a system for the economic integration of the Union during a period of its transition from separate national markets towards a single (common) market.Results. Over five years of operation in the field of stadardization, the Eurasian Economic Union has created the necessary organizational and legal framework to ensure the successful development of integration processes. The national legislation on standardization has been modernized with allowance for the harmonization of these laws. In the next five-six years, the development of international standards for 40 technical regulations is expected to be completed, which would create a regulatory framework for unhindered interaction between all participants of the single (common) EAEU market. Conclusions. The analysis of activities in the field of standardization reveals a sufficiently thought-out and coordinated policy of the EAEU states in creating the necessary conditions for overcoming legal and administrative barriers in the movement of goods and services within the common economic space of the EAEU.

scholarly journals Putin's and Russian-led Eurasian Economic Union: A hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons”

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-60 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno S. Sergi
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Industrial Production ◽  
Political Agenda ◽  
Regional Economic Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Post Soviet Space

The Eurasian Economic Union is an institution formalized in January 2015 for the purpose of regional economic integration; it includes five countries: Russia, Kazakhstan, Belarus, Armenia, and Kyrgyzstan, and may include Mongolia and Tajikistan in the future. With a GDP of $1.59 trillion in 2015, an industrial production of $1.3 trillion in 2014, and population of almost 200 million as of 2016, the EEAU could represent a geopolitical success that supports both Putin's ambitious political agenda and the Union's economic prospects. Although the efforts of this Union are ongoing and long-term success is not certain, the Russia-led Eurasian Economic Union can be considered a hybrid half-economics and half-political “Janus Bifrons” that serves as a powerful illustration of what Putin envisions for the post-Soviet space. Despite promising steps so far, more should be done toward the achievement of economic development and balanced opportunity for all Eurasian countries. Russia's longstanding role within the Union, as well as its power and political motivations, are all considerations that must be accounted for.

Securitization and the Economy of Risks

2020 ◽  
pp. 1662-1675
Author(s):  
Oxana Karnaukhova
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Historical Memory ◽  
European Economic Area ◽  
Way Of Life ◽  
Strategic Risk ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
The Common ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
In The Beginning

In the beginning of the 21st century the society of the Second Modernity with incalculable risks marks human conditions in orientation and self-categorization on the basis of historical memory. The dichotomy “We-Other” influences strategic risk decisions. Security is becoming the umbrella topic referring to public goods, transnational markets, “the specific way of life”. In the context of different agreements and regulations co-existence (such as European Economic Area, Eurasian Economic Union, BRIC etc.) claims for personal and collective safety together with the rhetoric of memorization influences decision-making process and becomes a burden of securitization. The “Eurasian” project of integration is observed in its transformation from being based on the post-Soviet memory toward economically beneficial cooperation. Still the Eurasian Economic Union is seen as vague in its goals and instruments, relying on the approach to economic integration with the reference to the common past, memories and identity.

Eurasian Integration and Problems of Civil Society

2020 ◽  
pp. 117-134
Author(s):  
Elena Stetsko
Keyword(s):  
Civil Society ◽  
Political Thought ◽  
Political Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Independent States ◽  
Soviet Space ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Post Soviet Space ◽  
Discussion Topic

The сhapter studies the relationship between the development of integration processes and the development of civil society in the post-Soviet space and, in particular, in the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. It consists of five parts. The introduction presents the main trends and vectors of integration processes in the post-Soviet space. The first part considers the concept of “civil society” and its features in Western and Russian political thought. The second part highlights the features of building a civil society in the independent states of the EAEU. General points and differences in the emerging civil societies of the EAEU countries are revealed. Further, in the fourth part, the “Eurasian idea” is considered in terms of its compatibility with the peculiarities of the development of civil society in the post-Soviet space. The final part proposes a discussion topic on the possibility of political integration within the EAEU.

scholarly journals Experience of Economic Integration of Kyrgyzstan within the Framework of the Eurasian Economic Union

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chinara Alamanova
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Political Support ◽  
Trade Integration ◽  
Integration Policy ◽  
Institutional Integration ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
History Of ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Restrictive Measures ◽  
Positive Results

At present, practically all countries of the world are involved in integration processes. However, at the present stage, the mechanism of integration interaction is not sufficiently regulated, as evidenced by the experience of integration of the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union. The history of various integration groupings, along with regularities, carries in itself essential features of historical uniqueness. This determines the theoretical and practical relevance of the research topic. In the article, the example of Kyrgyzstan explores the experience of the country's integration into an integration association. Practice has revealed not only positive results, but also negative unpredictable consequences. Such experience requires scientific and practical study and will be useful for further improvement of economic integration processes. The abolition of customs control has enabled the development of an illegal flow of goods both to Kyrgyzstan and from Kyrgyzstan. The change in tariffs of the Eurasian Economic Union for third countries may lead to a reduction in multilateral trade. Russia's application of anti-sanctions to individual countries violates the first basic principle of integration: the trade policy of the four members of the Eurasian Economic Union is becoming less coherent. The difficult access of goods due to the application of restrictive measures in relation to the countries of the Eurasian Economic Union is noted. To achieve the integration result, the following conditions are necessary: Conducting a harmonious trade integration policy, Implementation of political (institutional) integration, General political support for integration plans, including by third countries.

scholarly journals Macroeconomic Coordination in the Eurasian Economic Union: Strategic Aspects

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 38-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergey Shokhin ◽  
Ekaterina Kudryashova
Keyword(s):  
Strategic Planning ◽  
Economic Integration ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Free Movement ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Coordination Process ◽  
Free Movement Of Goods ◽  
Economic Union ◽  
Macroeconomic Coordination ◽  
Free Movement Of Capital

Coordinated macroeconomic policy is a special element within the integration process in addition to the four freedoms usual for economic integration: free movement of goods, free movement of services, free movement of labor, and free movement of capital. Macroeconomic coordination was, from the very beginning, a key idea behind each stage of the process of Eurasian economic integration. The politico-ideological foundation of the Eurasian idea is the facilitation of growth for Eurasian countries on the basis of economic pragmatism. The macroeconomic coordination process within the Eurasian Economic Union is based on the coordination of strategic planning systems in each Member State. Strategic planning plays an important role in macroeconomic coordination. Strategic planning documents have a sound legal basis in the Treaty establishing the Eurasian Economic Union. At the same time Eurasian integration provides a platform for best practice exchanges and coordination of strategic planning between the Member States.

The Eurasian Economic Union: on the «Strategy-2025» and on the transport and logistics component of the document`s issues

2021 ◽  
pp. 123-128
Author(s):  
M. S. Komov
Keyword(s):  
Economic Integration ◽  
Regulatory System ◽  
Legal Framework ◽  
Eurasian Economic Union ◽  
Economic Commission ◽  
Regulation Of Transport ◽  
Economic Union

The article briefly describes the content of the new conceptual and programmatic perspective document of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) –«Strategic directions for the development of the Eurasian economic integration until 2025» («Strategy-2025»). The transport and logistics component of the document`s problems is commented on in more detail. In the course of these comments, proposals are substantiated to modify the legal framework of the EAEU in the aspect of strengthening the institutional regulation of transport integration of the participating countries on the basis of expanding the functional powers of regulators (subjects of the unified interstate regulatory system), including the Eurasian Economic Commission (EAEC) and its departments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document