scholarly journals Keefektivan Team Accelerated Instruction Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sri Adi Widodo
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Test Methods ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Accelerated Instruction ◽  
And Mathematics ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Student Problem

<p>Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui keefektivan pembelajaran <em>Team Accelerated Instruction</em> terhadap kemampuan pemecahan dan prestasi belajar matematika siswa. Jenis Penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa SMP kelas VIII se-kota Jogjakarta dengan ukuran sampel 369 siswa yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknik <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Variabel penelitian adalah kemampuan memecahkan masalah, prestasi belajar matematika dan model pembelajaran. Data diperoleh dengan tes untuk menentukan kemampuan awal siswa, kemampuan memecahkan masalah dan prestasi belajar yang kemudian diuji dengan analisis variansi multivariat<em> </em>(MANOVA). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran <em>Team Accelerated Instruction</em> lebih efektif digunakan jika dibandingkan dengan model pembelajaran langsung.</p><p><em>The purpose of this research was to determine the effectiveness of teams Accelerated Instruction to the problem solving and mathematics achievement. This research kind was the quasi experiment. The population in this research was all the VIII class student of more than Jogjakarta with the sample totally 369 students was taken with cluster random sampling. Variably the research was the problem solving, mathematics achievement and learning models.  Data obtained by test methods for the stage of student, problem solving, and </em><em>achievement are then analyzed to the </em><em>multivariate analisis of variance (</em><em>MANOVA). The results of this research are team accelerated instruction more effectiveness with direct instruction</em></p>

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE NHT DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL PADA PEMBELAJARAN BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (01) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingga Nico Pradana
Keyword(s):  
Data Collection ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Class Viii ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling ◽  
Collection Methods

<p>The purpose of this research was to determine the effect of learning models to student achievement. Learning models compared between NHT-CTL, NHT and direct instruction. Method of research used quasi experimental with the factorial design of 3x1. Population of this research was all students class VIII in SMP Negeri at Madiun City. The sampling technique using a stratified cluster random sampling. Samples in this research were 266 students with 91 students as experimental class I, 88 students as experimental class II and 87 students as control class. Data collection methods used documentation and test.Hypothesis testing was performed using one-way analysis of variance with unequal cells. Based on the results of hypothesis testwere concluded that NHT-CTL learning model gave better achievement than NHT learning model and direct instruction, while NHT learning model and direct instruction gave the same achievement. </p>

scholarly journals EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NHT DAN SNOWBALL THROWING PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI DATAR KELAS VIII SMP AL-NUR CIBINONG

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 52
Author(s):  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Irma Susanty
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Junior High School ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Grade Student ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

AbstractThe aim of the research was to find out the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement. The learning model compared were NHT(Numbered Head Together), snowball throwing and convensional. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental by 3×1 factorial design. The population was the eight grade student of junior high school in Cibinong district on academic year 2017/2018. The sampling tecnique was cluster random sampling. The size of the sampel was 103 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 34  students in the second experimental group and 33 students in third experimental group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The data was analyzed using unbalanced one-way analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research was NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than Snowball Throwing and convensional learning model, and snowball throwing learning model give better mathematics achievement than convensional learning model.Keywords: NHT, Snowball throwing, mathematics achievement

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Discovery Learning Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika ditinjau dari Minat Belajar Siswa SMP Negeri di Kota Rantepao

2018 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 252
Author(s):  
Baso Intang Sappaile ◽  
Nurwati Djaman ◽  
Yusem Ba’ru ◽  
Kadir Kadir ◽  
Muhammad Darwis
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Direct Instruction ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Discovery Learning ◽  
Student Interest ◽  
Learning Interest ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan model pembelajaran  discovery learning terhadap hasil belajar matematika ditinjau dari minat belajar siswa. Metode penelitian ini merupakan penelitian eksperimen semu dengan desain 2x2 faktorial. Tempat penelitian dilakukan di SMP Negeri di Kota Rantepao, tahun pelajaran 2014/2015. Populasi penelitian adalah semua siswa kelas tujuh SMP Negeri Rantepao dan sampel diperoleh dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling dengan jumlah anggota sampel sebanyak 78 siswa.  Model pembelajaran sebagai variabel bebas, minat belajar sebagai variabel intervening, dan hasil belajar matematika siswa sebagai variabel respon. Model pembelajaran discovery learning digunakan pada kelompok perlakuan, dan model pembelajaran langsung digunakan pada kelompok pembanding. Data dikumpulkan dengan menggunakan instrumen tes hasil belajar matematika dan skala minat belajar dan digunakan ANAVA dua jalan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa: (1) model pembelajaran dan minat belajar mempunyai pengaruh terhadap hasil belajar matematika siswa, dan (2) model pembelajaran discovery learning lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran langsung. Kata kunci: model discovery learning, model langsung, minat belajar, hasil belajar matematika siswa. ABSTRACT The major objective of this research was to investigate the effects of applying discovery learning on mathematics achievement in terms of student's learning interest. The research methodology was a quasi-experimental and the design of the research was a 2x2 factorial. The research was conducted in SMP Negeri in Rantepao City in academic year 2014/2015. The population of research was made up of all seventh grade students of SMP Negeri Rantepao from where a sample of 78 students was obtained by using cluster random sampling technique. Learning model as the independent variable, student's learning interest as intervening variable, and mathematics achievement of student as response variable. The treatment class group taught by using Discovery learning model. While the comparison group was taught by Direct Instruction. The data were collected using the mathematics learning test instrument and learning interest scale. The data collected were analyzed with two way ANOVA. The findings showed that: (1) learning model and interest in learning have an effect on student learning outcomes, and (2) Discovery learning model is better than Direct Instruction. Keywords: discovery learning model, direct instruction, student interest, matemathics acievement.

scholarly journals Studi Perbedaan Keefektifan Pembelajaran LC-5E dan CIRC Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 26
Author(s):  
E. Sulastri ◽  
Scolastika Mariani ◽  
Mashuri Mashuri
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mastery Learning ◽  
Test Method ◽  
Learning Cycle ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Anova Test ◽  
Final Data ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

<p>membandingkan keefektifan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe LC-5E (<em>Learning Cycle 5E</em>) dan tipe CIRC(<em>Cooperative Integrated Reading and Compos</em><em>i</em><em>tion</em>) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika peserta didik. Populasi penelitian adalah peserta didik kelas X SMA Negeri 2 Ungaran. Sampel diambil secara <em>cluster random sampling</em>. Data akhir mengenai kemampuan pemecahan masalah diambil menggunakan metode tes<em>. </em>Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji proporsi, uji Anava dan uji lanjut LSD. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kelas yang dikenai perlakuan pembelajaran LC-5Edan CIRCmencapai ketuntasan belajar. Dari uji Anava diketahui bahwa ada perbedaan rata-rata yang signifikan. Selanjutnya dilakukan uji lanjut LSDmenunjukkan Kelompok Eksperimen 1 paling baik. Simpulan dari penelitian ini adalah model pembelajaran LC-5Elebih efektif dibandingkan tipe CIRC terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik. Saran yang dapat direkomendasikan adalah pembelajaran LC-5E dapat digunakan sebagai alternatif dalam mengembangkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah peserta didik.</p><p> </p><p><em>The purpose of this research was to</em><em>comparethe effectiveness of cooperative learning models type LC-5E (Learning Cycle 5E) and type CIRC (Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition) toward students’ mathematic problem solving ability. The population of this research was students grade X of SMA Negeri 2 Ungaran.The samples were taken by cluster random sampling. The final data about students’ problem solving ability were taken used test method. Data were analysed used propotion test, ANOVA test, and LSD test. The result shown that classes that given LC-5E and CIRC learning models achieved mastery learning. From ANOVA test known that the averages are different significantly.From LSD test is known that the experiment group was the best. The conclusions from this research are LC-5E is more effective than CIRC learning model toward students’ problem solving ability. The suggestion is LC-5E model can be used as an alternative to develope stundents’ problem solving ability.</em></p>

scholarly journals EFEKTIFITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM SOLVING TIPE SEARCH SOLVE CREATE AND SHARE (SSCS) DAN COOPERATIVE PROBLEM SOLVING (CPS) DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIS TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Raehanah Raehanah ◽  
Sri Mulyani ◽  
Sulistyo Saputro
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Mathematical Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Anova Analysis ◽  
Cooperative Problem Solving ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Academic Year ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak : Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan model problem solving tipe Search, Solve, Create, and  Share (SSCS) dan Cooperative Problem Solving (CPS) terhadap hasil belajar siswa dengan memperhatikan kemampuan matematisnya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode eksperimen semu dan dilaksanakan dari bulan Desember 2012-Juni 2013. Populasi penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas XI IPA SMA N 1 Ngemplak Boyolali Tahun Pelajaran 2012/2013. Sampel diperoleh dengan teknik cluster random sampling yang terdiri dari dua kelas, XI IPA 1 dan XI IPA 3. Kelas XI IPA 1 diberi pembelajaran dengan model SSCS dan kelas XI IPA 3 diberi pembelajaran dengan model CPS. Data dikumpulkan dengan metode tes untuk prestasi belajar kognitif dan kemampuan matematis, angket untuk prestasi afektif, dan lembar observasi untuk psikomotor siswa. Hipotesis diuji menggunakan Anava dua jalan 2x2. Dari hasil analisis data disimpulkan bahawa: 1) Tidak ada pengaruh penggunaan model SSCS dan CPS terhadap prestasi belajar kognitif siswa, tetapi berpengaruh signifikan terhadap prestasi afektif dan psikomotor; 2) Ada pengaruh kemampuan matematis terhadap prestasi kognitif siswa, tetapi tidak ada pengaruhnya terhadap prestasi afektif dan psikomotor; 3) Ada interaksi antara model pembelajaran SSCS dan CPS dengan kemampuan matematis terhadap prestasi kognitif dan psikomotor siswa, tetapi tidak ada interaksinya terhadap prestasi afektif.Kata Kunci :  problem solving, kemampuan matematis, prestasi belajarAbstract : The aims of this study were to determine the effect of the using problem solving type Search Solve Create and Share (SSCS) and Cooperative Problem Solving (CPS) models toward student’s learning achievements by observe their mathematical ability. The method used in this research was quasi experimental method and it was conducted from December 2012 to June 2013. The population was the students in 11th Science Grade SMAN 1 Ngemplak Boyolali on Academic Year 2012/2013 Semester II. The samples were taken using cluster random sampling, consisted of two class XI IPA 1 and XI IPA 3. The learning method applied to XI IPA 1 was CPS and to XI IPA 3 was SSCS. The data were collected using tests for student’s cognitive and mathematical ability, questioner for measuring affective, and observation sheet for assessing psychomotor. The hypotheses were tested using Anova (Analysis of Variance) two way 2x2 and Kruskal-Wallis one way analysis of variance method. From the data analysis, it’s could be concluded that: 1) there was no effect of learning models towards student’s cognitive, but  there was an effect towards student’s affective and psychomotor; 2) there was an effect mathematical ability towards student’s cognitive, but there was no effect towards student’s affective and psychomotor; 3) there was an interaction between learning models and mathematical ability toward student’s cognitive and psychomotor, but there was no interaction toward student’s psychomotor.Keywords: problem solving, mathematical ability, learning achievement

scholarly journals PENERAPAN MODEL TSTS DAN NHT PADA MATERI PERSAMAAN FUNGSI EKSPONEN

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurina Kurniasari Rahmawati ◽  
Arie Purwa Kusuma ◽  
Patar Suparman
Keyword(s):  
Mathematics Achievement ◽  
Analysis Of Variance ◽  
Exponential Function ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Achievement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

The aim of the research was to find out wich one that gives mathematics achievement between Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), Numbered Heads Together (NHT) or conventional learning models in exponential function. The sampel on this research was 108 students consisted of 36 students in the first experimental group, 36 students in the second experimental group and 36 students in the control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test. The sampling teqnique is cluster random sampling. The analyze prerequisite Lilliefors metod for nourmality test and used Bartlett metod for homogeny tast. The data was analyzed using balanced one-way analysis of variance and to be assumed to Scheffe’ metod. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) TSTS learning model gives better mathematics achievement than NHT and conventional learning model, and NHT learning model gives better mathematics achievement than direct learning model.AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui model manakah yang memberikan prestasi matematika antara model Two Stay Two Stray (TSTS), model Numbered Heads Together (NHT) atau model pembelajaran konvensional pada materi fungsi eksponensial. Sampel pada penelitian ini adalah 108 siswa yang terdiri dari 36 siswa pada kelompok eksperimen pertama, 36 siswa pada kelompok eksperimen kedua dan 36 siswa pada kelompok kontrol. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes hasil belajar matematika. Teknik pengambilan sampel adalah cluster random sampling. Metode analisis Lilliefors prasyarat untuk uji normalitas dan menggunakan metoda Bartlett untuk uji homogen. Data dianalisis menggunakan analisis varians satu satu jalan dengan sel sama dan dilanjutkan uji Scheffe. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah sebagai berikut. (1) model pembelajaran TSTS memberikan prestasi matematika yang lebih baik daripada NHT dan model pembelajaran konvensional, dan model pembelajaran NHT memberikan prestasi matematika yang lebih baik daripada model pembelajaran langsung.Kata kunci: TSTS, NHT, konvensional, prestasi matematika.

scholarly journals PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TSTS–NHT DAN GAYA BELAJAR TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR PENGANTAR BISNIS

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 88
Author(s):  
Mendarissan Aritonang ◽  
Abdul Hamid K ◽  
Julaga Situmorang
Keyword(s):  
Cooperative Learning ◽  
Learning Styles ◽  
Learning Outcomes ◽  
Learning Style ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Business Students ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan :(1) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TST lebih tinggi dari mahasiswa yang diajar dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT. (2) Untuk mengetahui hasil belajar  pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis dan mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis. (3) Untuk mengetahui interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  terhadap hasil belajar pengantar bisnis. Penelitian ini dilaksanakan di Universitas Methodist Indonesia. Populasi berjumlah 180 orang. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan cluster random sampling. Metode penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain faktorial 2 x 2 dilanjutkan dengan statistik inferensial dengan menggunakan ANAVA dua jalur dengan taraf signifikan α = 0,05 yang dilanjutkan dengan uji Scheffe. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe TSTS lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang diajarkan dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe NHT; (2) hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar teoritis lebih tinggi dari pada hasil belajar pengantar bisnis mahasiswa yang memiliki gaya belajar pragmatis; (3) terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran kooperatif dengan gaya belajar  dalam mempengaruhi hasil belajar mahasiswa.  Kata Kunci: model pembelajaran kooperatif, TST, NHT, gaya belajar, pengantar bisnis.  Abstract: This study aims: (1) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the TST type are higher than students who are taught with the cooperative learning model of the NHT type. (2) To find out the introductory learning outcomes of business students who have theoretical learning styles and students who have pragmatic learning styles. (3) To determine the interaction between cooperative learning models with learning styles on introductory business learning outcomes. This research was conducted at the Methodist University of Indonesia. The population is 180 people. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling. Quasi-experimental research method with 2 x 2 factorial design followed by inferential statistics using two-way ANAVA with a significant level α = 0.05 followed by the Scheffe test. The results showed: (1) the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the cooperative learning model type TSTS were higher than the results of introductory business learning students who were taught with the NHT type cooperative learning model; (2) the results of introductory business learning students who have theoretical learning styles are higher than the results of introductory business learning students who have pragmatic learning styles; (3) there is an interaction between cooperative learning models and learning styles in influencing student learning outcomes. Keywords: cooperative learning model, TST, NHT, learning style, business introduction.

scholarly journals KEMAMPUAN BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA DENGAN METODE PEMBELAJARAN THINKING ALOUD PAIR PROBLEM SOLVING (TAPPS) BERBANTUAN MEDIA LKPD PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG BALOK DAN KUBUS

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Nadlifah Alqonita
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Thinking Aloud ◽  
Sequential Explanatory Design ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Sequential Explanatory ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Penelitian kombinasi ini dilatar belakangi oleh rendahnya kemampuan siswa dalam hal berpikir reflektif. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mengetahui adanya perbedaan kemampuan berpikir reflektif pada kelas kontrol dengan pembelajaran konvensional dan pada kelas eksperimen dengan menggunakan metode Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving; dan (2) mendeskripsikan kemampuan berpikir reflektif peserta didik setelah diterapkan dengan pembelajaran menggunakan metode Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving materi bangun ruang balok dan kubus MTs Ma’arif Sidomukti gresik. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode kombinasi (mix method) dengan sequential explanatory design. Pengambilan sampel dalam penelitian ini ditentukan berdasarkan teknik Cluster Random Sampling diperoleh kelas VIII-1 sebagai kelas kontrol dan VIII-2 sebagai kelas eksperimen. Data kuantitatif diperoleh melalui soal tes kemampuan berpikir reflektif, analisis data yang digunakan yaitu dengan menggunakan uji normalitas, uji homogenitas, dan uji t. sedangkan pengumpulan data kualitatif diperoleh dari wawancara, observasi, dan catatan lapangan guna untuk mendukung data kuantitatif yang digunakan. Subjek penelitian kualitatif terdiri dari 6 siswa yang masing-masing kelas terdiri dari siswa yang berkemampuan tinggi, sedang, dan rendah.  Analisis data hasil post-test kemampuan berpikir reflektif siswa yang berkemampuan rendah sebesar 10%, sedang sebesar 43,33%, tinggi sebesar 46,67%. Sedangkan rata-rata nilai siswa termasuk dalam kategori tinggi yaitu 83%. Dari beberapa analisis data tersebut menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan berpikir reflektif masuk dalam kategori tinggi setelah penerapan dengan metode pembelajaran Thinking Aloud pair Problem Solving berbantuan media LKPD.

scholarly journals EFEKTIVITAS MODEL PEMBELAJARAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PEMECAHAN MASALAH MATEMATIKA SISWA KELAS VIII SMP

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Sri Utami ◽  
Lalu Sucipto
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Random Sampling ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
T Test ◽  
Problem Solving Skills ◽  
Math Problem ◽  
Math Problem Solving ◽  
Cluster Random Sampling

Abstrak - Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui keefektifan model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram yang berjumlah 153 siswa. Sampel dalam penelitian ini yaitu kelas VIII B dengan jumlah 28 siswa. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuantitatif, dengan desain pre-eksperimen (One Group Pretest Postest Design). Teknik pengambilan sampel yaitu menggunakan teknik cluster  random sampling . Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji-t test Sampel Related. Hasil perhitungan uji-t tes Sampel Related  didapatkan  sebesar dan sebesar dengan taraf signifikan . Karena , maka menunjukkan bahwa model pembelajaran Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) efektif terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa.Abstract: This study aims to determine the effectiveness of Teachers Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model for students' math problem solving skills. The population in this study is the students of grade VIII SMP Salafiyah Darul Falah Mataram, amounting to 153 students. The sample in this research is class VIII B with the number of 28 students. The type of research used is quantitative research, with pre-experiment design (One Group Pretest Postest Design). The sampling technique is using cluster random sampling technique. Technique of data analysis using test-t test Sampel Related. The result of t-test calculation of Sample Related test obtained t_hitung equal to 19,01 and t_table equal to 2,052 with significant level 5%. Because t_hitung≥t_tabel, then show that Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) learning model effective to student's math problem solving ability.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document