scholarly journals Administracinė teisė: interesų veiksnys įstatymų leidyboje

Teisė ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 74 ◽  
pp. 33-45
Author(s):  
Arvydas Andruškevičius
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Public Interests ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Social ◽  
Social Interests ◽  
The Creation

Straipsnyje nagrinėjama socialinių interesų įtaka administracinės srities įstatymų leidybai. Administra­cinės teisėdaros kertinis principas yra optimalus asmens ir visuomenės interesų derinimas: tai prielaida kurti socialiniu požiūriu teisingesnę pozityvinę teisę, atitinkančią Konstitucijos preambulėje skelbiamą teisinės valstybės siekį. Teigiama, kad interesų pusiausvyros įtvirtinimas įstatymuose gali keistis priklau­somai nuo valstybės ekonominės raidos ypatumų. Nurodomos ir kai kurios subjektyvios priežastys, kodėl interesų derinimas administracinėje teisėje tam tikrais atvejais būna problemiškas. In this article the influence of social interests upon administrative legislation is investigated. The author states that the essential imperative in the creation of administrative law is an optimal coordi­nation of private needs and public interests. This is a precondition to create a fairer – from the social point of view – positive law, corresponding to the striving for a state under the rule of law declared in the Preamble to the Constitution. The article also pointes out some subjective reasons why the coordination of interests in administrative law is sometimes problematic.

A PROPÓSITO DEL ORIGEN Y EVOLUCIÓN DEL RÉGIME ADMINISTRATIF

2010 ◽  
pp. 767-785
Author(s):  
JESÚS LEGUINA VILLA
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Public Rights ◽  
Statutory Power ◽  
Administrative Courts ◽  
Ancien Régime ◽  
Principle Of Legality

El Derecho Administrativo es un producto propio y específico del constitucionalismo nacido tras la ruptura revolucionaria con el Antiguo Régimen, que resultará profundamente condicionado por las circunstancias sociopolíticas del país, Francia, donde nació. El Régimen Administrativo del Estado de Derecho se conforma a partir del principio de legalidad, de la potestad reglamentaria, de las libertades públicas y los derechos públicos subjetivos, de la responsabilidad de la Administración y del control a través de la jurisdicción contencioso-administrativa. Administrazio Zuzenbidea konstituzionalismoaren berezko produktua espezifikoa da, Frantziako Iraultzak Erregimen Zaharrarekin apurtu ostean sortua eta herrialde horren egoera soziopolitikoak sakon baldintzatua. Zuzenbide Estatuaren Administrazio Araubideak osatzeko hauek guztiak hartzen dira abiapuntu: legezkotasun-printzipioa, arauzko ahala, askatasun publikoak eta eskubide publiko subjektiboak, Administrazioaren erantzukizuna eta administrazio-auziarekiko jurisdikzioaren bidez egiten den kontrola. Administrative Law is a product typical and specific of the constitutionalism born after the revolutionary break-off with the Ancien Regime, which was deeply conditioned by the sociopolitical circumstances of the State, France, where it was born. The Administrative Regime of the Rule of Law was made up from the point of view of the principle of legality, the statutory power, public freedoms and subjective public rights, the liability by the Administration and the review by means of the contentious administrative courts.

An Overview of Good Governance

2019 ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The State ◽  
Institutional Framework ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Government

Good governance is needed because of legislative gaps, prevention of corruption, maladministration, and mismanagement, and fragmentation of administrative law norms. The concept of good governance has been developed in addition to aspects which can already be found in the rule of law and democracy concepts but are also related to the institutional framework of the government. The term ‘government’ is used for all the powers in the state; the administration is only one of these powers. These powers must fulfil certain norms, principles which sometimes are unwritten and developed by the judiciary or the ombudsman but more and more codified in the frame of the general (administrative) legislation. All the institutions of the government are involved in the development of these principles of good governance. There is not only a separation between the powers of the state, but more and more there are interactions between these powers in the development of principles of good governance and, hence, there is a balance between these principles. Therefore, there are different producers and sources of good governance.

scholarly journals ADMINISTRATIVE OFFENSE: ONTOLOGY OF GUILT AND PUNISHMENT

2020 ◽  
pp. 59-66
Author(s):  
Александр Анатольевич Беженцев
Keyword(s):  
Social Justice ◽  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Subsequent Development ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Administrative Legislation ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Current Code

Автором исследуется гносеология форм вины в зависимости от степени общественной опасности, делается вывод о том, что признание административным законодательством виновности свойством всех административных правонарушений имеет исключительно важный смысл, так как способствует точному соблюдению принципов социальной справедливости, дальнейшему укреплению законности в стане и отвечает не только требованиям последующего развития административного права, но и нуждам правоприменительной практики административно-юрисдикционной деятельности. Одним из обязательных юридических признаков понятия административного правонарушения является и наказуемость деяния, так как в действующем КоАП РФ применяется как термин «наказание», так и «взыскание». Автор разграничивает данные понятия, делает вывод о том, что наказуемость является одним из необходимых признаков понятия административного проступка, поскольку без административного правонарушения не возможно наказание, точно так же как без причины нет следствия. The author examines the ontology of forms of guilt depending on the degree of public danger, concludes that the recognition by administrative legislation of guilt as a property of all administrative offenses has an extremely important meaning, as it contributes to the exact observance of the principles of social justice, further strengthening the rule of law in the camp and meets not only the requirements the subsequent development of administrative law, but also the needs of law enforcement practice of administrative jurisdictional activity awns. One of the mandatory legal features of the concept of an administrative offense is the punishability of the act, since the term «punishment» and «foreclosure» are used in the current Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation, the author delimits these concepts, concludes that punishability is one of the necessary features of the concept of administrative misconduct, since without an administrative offense punishment is not possible, just as without a reason there is no investigation.

scholarly journals Uniform Application of Laws in the Context of Post-Classical Law

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 1596-1605
Author(s):  
Igor M. Alekseev ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Natural Law ◽  
Legal Theory ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Phenomenological Analysis ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Social Conflicts ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Legal Concepts

The article reveals the impotence of classical legal theories to explain the inconsistency of the practice of applying laws. The legal dogma is subjected to the phenomenological analysis. Moreover, its inability to overcome the conventions of pure jurism is shown. From the position of postclassical jurisprudence, the theory of natural law is criticized. The necessity of refusing to contrast natural and positive law is substantiated. The communicative concept of law, its cognitive value and role in ensuring a uniform application of laws are considered. The criticism of integrative legal theories is evaluated from the perspective of the functionality of law in the form of resolving social conflicts. The approach that reduces legal theory to a method of resolving conflicts is called into question. The negative influence of the dichotomy of positive and natural law is argued, both on the uniform application of laws and on the rule of law in general. From the point of view of the functionality of law, the correlation of its material and procedural branches is revealed. As a result, a hypothesis is formulated that the main direction of the development of legal science is the creation of integrative law that can combine various legal concepts, which will allow us to build a rigid legal dogma based on unified methodological foundations and remove contradictions between legal theories in resolving social conflicts

scholarly journals Rizaeddin Fakhraddin (1859‒1936) on Model of State of the Modern Epoch

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 107-120
Author(s):  
A. Yu. Khabutdinov
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal System ◽  
Social Issues ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Political ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Late Modern

This article is devoted to the ideas of Rizaetdin Fakhretdin (1859‒1936) concerning the statehood of the Late Modern (19th century) period. His main theological work “Dini ve ijtimagy meseleler” (“Religious and Social Issues” (1914)) was devoted to the justification of the modernization reforms as well as to ways of their understanding from the Muslim point of view. R. Fakhraddin analyzed reforms of the political and legal system, the introduction of the Constitution, the construction of the rule of law, the creation of Parliament. He justified the necessity and legitimacy of these reforms from the point of view of the Qur’an and the Sunnah.

Reaktualisasi Proses Penyidikan oleh Kepolisian Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Pancasila dan Optimalisasi Pemanfaatan Teknologi

Jurnal Hukum ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 1737
Author(s):  
Ira Alia Maerani
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Public Prosecutor ◽  
Public Confidence ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Positive Law ◽  
Use Of Technology ◽  
The Times

Abstract                Indonesian Criminal Justice System consists of the police, public prosecutor and the courts. The role of the police investigators is certainly vital as the frontline in building public confidence in the rule of law in Indonesia. The role of the investigator is quite important in realizing society’s  justice. The era of globalization requires a pattern fast-paced, instant, measurable, and transparent of life and it requires investigators to follow the times by optimizing the use of technology. The aim of this study is to give effect to the rule of law in Indonesia that provides fairness, expediency and certainty. However, it considers to have priority of Pancasila values in the process of inquiry and investigation. The values of supreme divinity, God (religious), humanity, unity, democracy and justice are values that establish a balance (harmony) in enforcing the law. Law and its implementation can create product which meets the demands for social justice. This paper will examine the role of the investigator according to positive law currently in force as well as the role of investigator in implementing the values of Pancasila, accompanied by optimizing the use of technology. Keywords: Re-actualizing, Investigation, Police, values of Pancasila, Technology   AbstrakSistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia meliputi institusi kepolisian, kejaksaan, dan pengadilan. Peran penyidik dalam institusi kepolisian tentunya amat vital sebagai garda terdepan dalam membangun kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Peran penyidik amat besar dalam terwujudnya keadilan di masyarakat. Era globalisasi yang menuntut pola kehidupan yang serba cepat, instan, terukur, dan transparan menuntut penyidik untuk mengikuti perkembangan zaman dengan mengoptimalkan pemanfaatan teknologi. Tujuannya adalah untuk memberikan arti bagi penegakan hukum di Indonesia yakni memberikan keadilan, kemanfaatan, dan kepastian. Namun yang harus diperhatikan adalah mengutamakan nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam melakukan proses penyelidikan dan penyidikan. Nilai-nilai ketuhanan yang maha esa (religius), kemanusiaan, persatuan, kerakyatan dan keadilan merupakan nilai-nilai yang membangun keseimbangan (harmoni) dalam menegakkan hukum. Sehingga produk hukum dan pelaksanaannya memenuhi rasa keadilan masyarakat. Tulisan ini akan mengkaji tentang peran penyidik menurut hukum positif yang saat ini berlaku serta peran penyidik dalam mengimplementasikan  nilai-nilai Pancasila dengan diiringi optimalisasi pemanfaatan teknologi.Kata Kunci: Reaktualisasi,Penyidikan,Kepolisian,Nilai-nilai Pancasila,Teknologi

LEGAL ESSENCE OF ANCIENT PROVERBS AND SAYS AND THEIR SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Dranishnikova ◽  
Ivan Semenov
Keyword(s):  
Public Sphere ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Significance ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Public ◽  
Moral Standards ◽  
The Social ◽  
The Law ◽  
The Public Sphere ◽  
Status Position

The national legal system is determined by traditional elements characterizing the culture and customs that exist in the social environment in the form of moral standards and the law. However, the attitude of the population to the letter of the law, as a rule, initially contains negative properties in order to preserve personal freedom, status, position. Therefore, to solve pressing problems of rooting in the minds of society of the elementary foundations of the initial order, and then the rule of law in the public sphere, proverbs and sayings were developed that in essence contained legal educational criteria.

Theoretical and methodological determinants of the Robert von Mol’s concept of the social state

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-45
Author(s):  
Svetlana Pirozhok
Keyword(s):  
19Th Century ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Social Protection ◽  
The State ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Social State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
Legal Thought ◽  
The Social ◽  
The 19Th Century

The relevance of determining the theoretical and methodological determinants of the Robert von Moll’s concept of the social state is due to the need to determine the patterns of evolution of ideas about the state and law, as well as the need to assess the ability to use the potential of the Robert von Moll’s theoretical and legal heritage, his predecessors and contemporaries to identify the optimal model of the social state. Modern Russia attempts to build such state. The proclamation and consolidation of Russia as a social state governed by the rule of law at the constitutional level requires attention both to the experiments carried out in social and legal development, and to the practices of social reform, and also to those ideas that have not yet been embodied. The ideas of European scholars regarding the evolution of the state-legal organization of society in the early modern period, based on which Robert von Mohl (1799–1875) developed original concepts of a social state and a state governed by the rule of law are discussed in the article. An analysis of the state of European political and legal thought and identification of the factors that have a significant impact on the development of Robert von Mohl’s doctrine of a social state governed by the rule of law are the purposes of the scientific article. The methodological basis of the study was the dialectical-materialistic, general scientific (historical, systemic) and special (historical-legal, comparativelegal) methods of legal research. The method of reconstruction and interpretation of legal ideas had great importance. As a result of the study, it was concluded that in the first half of the 19th century in European political and legal thought various approaches was formed to consider the problems of social protection and how to resolve them. The development trend of European political science became the transition from ideas and principles formed in the conditions of police states and enlightened absolutism to the ideas of a state governed by the rule of law (constitutional) that protects the rights and freedoms of a citizen. At the same time, it was a question of the rights and freedoms of only a part of the population: the proletariat growing in number and significance was not always evaluated as an independent social stratum. The axiological principles of state justification have also changed. Rights and utility principle became dominant principles. In the first half of the 19th century the social issue as an independent scientific problem of the European political and legal thought was not posed and not systematically developed. Questions about the social essence of the state, the specifics of the implementation of the state social function, the features of public administration in the new stage of socio-economic development of society predetermined the emergence of the idea of a social state. This idea was comprehensively characterized in the Robert von Mohl’s works. He went down in the history of political and legal thought as founder of the concepts of social and governed by the rule of law state.

Good Governance

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henk Addink
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Rule Of Law ◽  
Good Governance ◽  
National Level ◽  
Administrative Law ◽  
Modern State ◽  
The Rule Of Law ◽  
The Third ◽  
Legal Perspective ◽  
Further Development

The pivotal aim of this book is to explain the creation, development, and impact of good governance from a conceptual, principal perspective and in the context of national administrative law. Three lines of reasoning have been worked out: developing the concept of good governance; specification of this concept by developing principles of good governance; and implementation of these principles of good governance on the national level. In this phase of further development of good governance, it is important to have a clear concept of good governance, presented in this book as the third cornerstone of a modern state, alongside the concepts of the rule of law and democracy. That is a rather new national administrative law perspective which is influenced by regional and international legal developments; thus, we can speak about good governance as a multilevel concept. But the question is: how is this concept of good governance further developed? Six principles of good governance (which in a narrower sense also qualify as principles of good administration) have been further specified in a systematic way, from a legal perspective. These are the principles of properness, transparency, participation, effectiveness, accountability, and human rights. Furthermore, the link has been made with integrity standards. The important developments of each of these principles are described on the national level in Europe, but also in countries outside Europe (such as Australia, Canada, and South Africa). This book gives a systematic comparison of the implementation of the principles of good governance between countries.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document