Penerapan Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Pendekatan Concrete-Representational-Abstract dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-186
Author(s):  
Lisa Dwi Afri

This research is motivated by the importance and still not optimal problem solving ability of student mathematical problem. This study examines the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities that acquire Guided Inquiry learning with Concrete-Representational-Abstract approach (ITCRA) and students who have received conventional learning, in terms of overall and math skills categories KAM (high, middle, low). This research is a quasi experiment with non-equivalent control group design. The population is grade VIII SMPN 1 Padang Panjang Lesson Year 2014/2015, and the samples are two classes from seven existing classes. Instruments used in the form of tests, observation sheets, and interview guidelines. The data obtained were analyzed using the difference test, ie t-test and mann-whitney. The results showed that: 1) The achievement and improvement of mathematical problem solving ability of students who received ITCRA learning overall better than those who received conventional learning, 2) the increased mathematical problem solving ability of moderate KAM and low KAM better than those with conventional learning, whereas in high KAM, students who received ITCRA learning was no better than that of conventional learning, and 3) there was a difference in the improvement of students' mathematical problem solving abilities of high KAM categories with KAM moderate and low category students who received ITCRA learning. However, there were no significant differences between moderate and low KAM category studentsKeywords: Guided Inquiry, concrete-representational-abstact, problem solving

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 85-96
Author(s):  
Winmery Lasma Habeahan

The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with the Contextual Teaching and Learning approach in the material of the two-variable linear equation system in class X SMA Negeri 2 Pematangsiantar. This study used an experimental method with the aim of being in accordance with the previous statement to determine the difference in students' mathematical problem-solving abilities with a contextual approach and an expository approach, with a randomized pretest-posttest control group design. The average increase in problem-solving abilities in the control class was 0.1688 while the increase in problem-solving abilities in the experimental class was 0.0085. By using the t-test (SPSS), with a value of Fcount = 10.907 and a significant level of 0.05, a significant probability is obtained 0.002 <0.05, it can be concluded that there is a difference in normalized gain or an increase in problem-solving ability with conventional and contextual approaches. Based on the average gain of the control and experimental classes, the increase in the control class using the conventional approach is higher than the experimental class with the contextual approach. The difference in increasing problem-solving abilities in conventional classrooms is possible due to differences in students' entry-level abilities, which can be seen in the average pretest of each class.


2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 435-446
Author(s):  
Nur Asih ◽  
Sendi Ramdhani

AbstrakTujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari pada konvensional, untuk mengetahui sikap kemandirian belajar siswa terhadap pembelajaran matematika menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA), dan untuk mengetahui hambatan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitiannya adalah eksperimen kuasi dan desain penelitiannya Nonequivalent control group design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON dengan sampel sebanyak dua kelas. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas XI MIPA-3 sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas XI MIPA-1 sebagai kelas kontrol. Instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis, angket dan wawancara. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA) lebih baik dari konvensional. Hasil angket siswa kelas XI MIPA-3 memperoleh hasil hampir seluruhnya positif respon siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Means End Analysis (MEA).Kata Kunci: Kemandirian, MEA, Pemecahan Masalah Matematis. Increased Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Student Learning Independence Using the Means-End Analysis Learning Model AbstractThe purpose of this research is to find out whether the improvement of students 'mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional learning, to determine the attitudes of students' learning independence towards mathematics learning using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model, and to find out the obstacles of students in solving problems mathematical problem solving abilities. The research method is a quasi-experiment and the research design is Nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI SMA PASUNDAN CIKALONGKULON with a sample of two classes. The sampling technique uses a purposive sampling technique. Class XI MIPA-3 as an experimental class and class XI MIPA-1 as a control class. The instruments were in the form of tests of mathematical problem-solving abilities, questionnaires, and interviews. Based on the results of data analysis, the improvement of students' mathematical problem-solving abilities using the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model is better than conventional. The results of the XI MIPA-3 class questionnaire obtained almost entirely positive student responses to the Means-End Analysis (MEA) learning model.Keywords: Independence, MEA, Mathematical Problem Solving.


2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 146-152
Author(s):  
Indhira Asih Vivi Yandhari ◽  
Trian Pamungkas Alamsyah ◽  
Dede Halimatusadiah

Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi dengan rendahnya kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa serta strategi pembelajaran yang masih bertumpu pada guru. Salah satu alternatifnya yakni diterapkalah strategi pembelajaran Problem Based Learning, karena strategi ini diharapakan dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa. Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk mengetahui pencapaian akhir dan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan strategi pembelajaran Problem Based Learning lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan strategi pembelajaran Inkuiri. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi ekperiment dengan desain non-equivalent control group. Teknik sampel menggunakan teknik purposive sampling, dimana kelas IV-A sebagai kelas ekperimen dan kelas IV-B sebagai kelas kontrol. Hasil analisis data menunjukan rata-rata skor posttest kelas ekperimen 75,03 dan kelas kontrol 68,7. Rata-rata data Gain kelas ekperimen 0,59 dan kelas kontrol 0,51. Hasil analisis tersebut memberikan kesimpulan bahwa pencapaian akhir dan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas ekperimen lebih baik daripada kelas kontrol.The research is motivated by the low mathematical problem solving abilities of students and learning strategies that are still based on the teacher. One of the alternative is to apply the learning strategies of Problem Based Learning, because this strategy is expected to improve students' mathematical problem solving abilities. This study has a goal whether the final achievement and improvement of students' mathematical problem solving abilities using Problem Based Learning learning strategies is better than students who use Inquiry learning strategies. The research method used was a quasi experiment with a non-equivalent control group design. The sample technique used purposive sampling technique, where class IV-A as the experimental class and class IV-B as the control class. The results of data analysis showed an average posttest score of experimental class 75.03 and control class 68.7. The average Gain data of the experimental class is 0.59 and the control class is 0.51. The results of the analysis provide the conclusion that the final achievement and improvement of experimental class mathematical problem solving abilities are better than the control class. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (05) ◽  
pp. 1408-1413
Author(s):  
Cut Masturi ◽  
M. Ikhsan ◽  
Anizar Ahmad

This study aims to determine the improvement of problem solving ability of mathematics and self-efficacy of students through problem-based learning model. This research method used pre-test post-test control group design. The population in this study is all of Year 7 students of SMP Negeri 10 Banda Aceh. Two classes of samples were randomly selected, the experimental and the control classesThe research instrument consisted of a mathematical problem solving test and self-efficacy questionnaire. Data analysis was using t-test statistic. The result of the research showed 1) mathematical problem solving ability of students through problem-based learning model better than students who received conventional learning, 2) Self-efficacy of students who through problem-based learning model better than students who learn conventionally.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Husna Husna ◽  
Fona Fitry Burais

Problem-solving is a process or thinking activity to solve a problem. Mathematical problem-solving skillis needed for students both in the process of understanding mathematics itself and in everyday life. The problem solving can beachieved by implementingthe learning using a problem-solving approachwhich trains students to deal with various problems including individuals and group problemsto be addressed individually or together. This learning is oriented towards the investigation and discovery which is solving the problems. It is the basis for students to solve problems critically, systematically, logically, and creatively as well as the ability to collaborateeffectively and to present fundamental knowledge which in turn can improvethe solving skill. This study aimed to examine whether the improvement of mathematical problem-solving skillof students learned with the problem-solving approach wasbetter than students taught using the conventional learning. The improvement was examined based on the students’ levels. This study applied a pre-test and post-test control group design. The population of the study was Year 7 students of one of the junior high schools in Pidie, Indonesia, consisting of seven classes in 2017/2018.Two classes, a control, and an experimental class were selected as the sample through purposive sampling technique. The instrument used to obtain the data is the mathematical problem-solving skill test.The data was then analyzed by employing a two-way ANOVA test using SPSS. The results of the study showed that the improvement of mathematical problem-solving skill of the students learning with the problem-solving approach is better than the students experiencing the conventional learning, reviewed based on student levels. There is no interaction between the learning models and student levels on mathematical problem-solving skills. The resultsare expected to be used as a reference for mathematics teachers to apply the problem-solving approach in the learning process to improve mathematical problem-solving skills.


2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 315-326
Author(s):  
Guntur Maulana Muhammad ◽  
Ari Septian ◽  
Mastika Insani Sofa

AbstrakTujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mendapatkan bukti empirik peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving lebih baik daripada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran biasa, untuk mengetahui bagaimana sikap siswa terhadap model pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving, dan untuk mengetahui ada tidaknya hubungan antara sikap siswa dengan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah Quasi Experimental. Desain penelitian ini menggunakan Nonequivalent Control Group Design. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah siswa kelas VIII di MTs At-tarbiyah dengan sampel kelas eksperimen 24 siswa dan kelas kontrol 20 siswa, dipilih dengan teknik purposive sampling. Kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving dan kelas kontrol menggunakan modell pembelajaran biasa. Berdasarkan hasil dan pembahasan, maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving lebih baik daripada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran biasa, sikap siswa terhadap model  pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving positif, dan tidak terdapat hubungan antara sikap siswa dengan peningkatan kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis. Abstract (Use of Creative Problem Solving Learning Model to Improve Students Mathematical Problem Solving bility)The aims of this research are to get empirical evidence of enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability which students use Creative Problem Solving learning model better than students use ordinary learning model, to know how students’ attitude toward Creative Problem Solving learning model, and to know the correlation between students’ attitude and enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability. The research method uses Quasi Experimental with Nonequivalent Control Group Design. The population in this research are grade VIII students at MTs At-tarbiyah, with a sample of, 24 students for the experimental class and 20 students for the control class are determined by purposive sampling. The experimental class uses the Creative Problem Solving learning model and the control class uses the ordinary learning model. Based on the results and discussions, it can be concluded that enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability of students that use Creative Problem Solving learning model better than students use ordinary learning model, students’ attitude toward Creative Problem Solving learning model is positive, and there is no correlation between students’ attitude and enhancement of mathematical problem solving ability.


2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 239
Author(s):  
Derry Nugraha ◽  
Heri Ginanjar ◽  
Rosalina Rolina

The research was caused by the poor of mathematical problem solving ability of students. This research aimed to compare of mathematical problem solving between students who learned through problem based learning and scientific approach. The method was an experimental method with a pretest-posttest control group design involving two groups and random sampling. At the first and end of learning, the two classes are given a test. The population in this research were Madrasah Aliyah students in Cimahi, while the sample consisted of two randomly selected classes. One class  which was given problem based learning and other class was given a scientific approach. The instrument was a set of  5-item mathematical problem solving test description, then those were analyzed with descriptive and inferential statistics using the help of minitab 17 software. Based on the results of the research, the conclusion was  the improvement of  mathematical problem solving  of students using problem based learning was better than students who use a scientific approach. 


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Dwi Afri

This research is motivated by the importance of developing students’s adversity quotient (AQ). This research examines the difference of students’s AQ in Guided Inquiry learning with Concrete-Representational-Abstract approach (ITCRA) and students’s AQ in conventional learning. This research is quasi experiment with nonequivalent control group design. The population is students which grade eighth in SMPN 1 Padang Panjang, and the samples is selected two classes from seven existing classes. Instruments used to collect data is scale of adversity quotient dan intervies guidelines. Data obtained were analyzed using mean difference t-test. The results show that there are differences of student’s AQ getting ITCRA learning and student’s AQ getting conventional learning.Keywords: Guided Inquiry, Concrete-Representational-Abstract, Adversity Quotient


2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-23
Author(s):  
Ineu Cahyati ◽  
Dedi Kuntadi ◽  
Diah Mulhayatiah

The purpose of study is to exam the influence of the anchored instruction model on student’s problem solving ability of physics. The method used in this research is quasi-experiment and used non-equivalent control group design. Two samples consist of treatment class learned by using anchored instruction model and control class learned by using conventional model who were selected using purposive sampling techniques. The study was conducted in Abdi Karya senior high school Tanjungsari class X. The magnitude of the increase problem solving ability of students can be seen from the average N-Gain experiment class learners of 0.70 categorized being high and the average N-Gain control class learners of 0.59 categorized being middle. The effect of learning was analyzed by Mann Whitney U-test. The result showed that student’s problem solving ability of Physics on treatment class is better than the control class.


2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-92
Author(s):  
Eliza Ayu Pratiwi ◽  
Amir Rusdi ◽  
Agustiany Dumeva Putri

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh penggunaan model pembelajaran mastery learning (belajar tuntas) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dikelas X SMA ‘Aisyiyah 1 Palembang. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah true exprimental design dengan desain pretest – posttest control group design, populasi yang digunakan adalah seluruh siswa kelas X yang ada di SMA ‘Aisyiyah 1 Palembang tahun ajaran 2015/2016. Penelitian ini mengambil dua kelas sebagai sampel yang diambil dengan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling yaitu kelas X4 dengan jumlah 37 siswa sebagai kontrol dan kelas X1 berjumlah 37 siswa sebagai kelas ekprimen. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan instrumen berupa tes kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan observasi kepada siswa. Data yang diperoleh dari hasil tes digunakan untuk menguji hipotesis penelitian dengan menggunakan uji-t. Dari hasil analisis diperoleh bahwa terdapat pengaruh positif penggunaan model pembelajaran mastery learning (belajar tuntas) terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa dan hasil rata-rata observasi aktivitas kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika siswa sebesar 74.This research aims to determine the effect of using the mastery learning models to the mathematical problem solving ability of first grader of 'Aisyiyah 1’s Senior High School Palembang. The type of this research is the true experimental design with the design pretest - posttest control group design, the populations are all first grader of 'Aisyiyah 1’s Senior High School Palembang 2015/2016. This research took two classes as a samples by using the cluster random sampling technique. The classes are X4 with 37 students as a control and X1 with 37 students as a experiment class. The research was conducted of eight meetings. The collection of datas are done by using an instrument which are mathematical problem solving ability test and observation to students. The datas obtained from the test are used to test the research hypothesis by using t-test. From the analysis, this shows that there is positive effect of using the mastery learning to the mathematical problem solving abilities of students and the average result of observation the ability mathematical problem solving is 74.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document