scholarly journals Reasoning ability through challenge based learning kahoot

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 180-188
Author(s):  
Wati Susilawati ◽  
Kartika Dewi
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Learning Improvement ◽  
Conflict Processes ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Challenge Based Learning ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Better Than

The main objective is to analyze the improvement of mathematical reasoning ability through the challenge based learning with kahoot application. An experimental study, pre-test and post-test control group design. The population subjects were all students of class XI of the SMAN 26 Bandung, by involving a sample of three classes through random sampling techniques from five parallel classes available. Instrument for mathematical reasoning tests. Findings: There was improvement in mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtained a challenge based learning assisted by the kahoot application, challenge based learning without a kahoot, and conventional learning. Improvement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who obtained a challenge based learning with kahoot application is better than challenge based learning without the kahoot, and expository learning. Challenge based learning kahoot applications can facilitate conflict processes, discovery, social interaction, and reflective to improve students’s mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals Influence of Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) Approach on the Enhancement of Primary School Students’ Mathematical Reasoning Ability

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 119-132
Author(s):  
Hafiziani Eka Putri ◽  
Erna Suwangsih ◽  
Puji Rahayu ◽  
Gia Nikawanti ◽  
Elfriyani Enzelina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary School ◽  
Primary Schools ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Primary School Students ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Fifth Grade Students

This research is motivated by the importance of mathematical reasoning abilities for primary school students. This research aims at looking at the effect of the Concrete-Pictorial-Abstract (CPA) approach on the enhancement of mathematical reasoning abilities of primary school students. This research method is a quasi-experiment with pre-test and post-test control group design in Mathematics subjects with the theme of data presentation. The research sample consisted of 121 fifth grade students in two primary schools in Bekasi Regency. The test and non-test instruments were involved in this research. The results revealed that there wasthe influence between the CPA approach and students' mathematical reasoning abilities, and the achievement and enhancement of mathematical reasoning abilities of students who got learning with the CPA approach werebetter than students who got conventional learning based on all student review and a category of Prior Mathematical Ability (PMA) high, moderate and low. In conclusion, the mathematical reasoning ability of primary school students can be improved by applying the CPA approach.

scholarly journals PENGARUH METODE INKUIRI TERBIMBING TERHADAP KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN DAN SELF CONFIDENCE SISWA SMP

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 401
Author(s):  
Neti Nuryanti ◽  
Tina Rosyana ◽  
Euis Eti Rohaeti
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Research Result ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Guided Inquiry ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Self Confidence ◽  
Inquiry Method ◽  
Better Than

This study aims to examine the achievement of mathematical reasoning ability and self confidence of MTs students using guided inquiry method compared with using ordinary learning. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method, with a pretest and postes experimental-control group design. The population in this study is all MTs students in West Bandung regency, while the sample of the research is as much as two classes are selected to be experimental class and control class. The experimental class gained learning by guided inquiry method and the control class gained regular learning. The instrument used is a matter of reasoning ability test and non test self confidence matter. Data of research result are tested and analyzed quantitatively by using statistical test (t test). The conclusions obtained are as follows: 1) students' mathematical reasoning ability that obtains learning with guided inquiry method is better than students who gain ordinary learning; 2) the ability of self confidence students who gain learning with guided inquiry method is better than students who get regular learning.

scholarly journals CAPAIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS SISWA DENGAN MODEL AIR

Numeracy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-48
Author(s):  
Nuralam Nuralam ◽  
Maulidayani Maulidayani
Keyword(s):  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Learning Model ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
Learning Models ◽  
Test Statistic ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Ability Test ◽  
Cluster Technique ◽  
Reasoning Abilities

The mathematical concept learned in school require mathematical reasoning abilities. But the test results show the students’ mathematical reasoning ability is still relatively low. To overcome this problem, applied a learning model called Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR). AIR can develop mathematical reasoning abilities students through problem solving. The purpose of this study is to describe the mathematical reasoning abilty of students through the AIR learning model is higher than taught through conventional learning models.. The research design used was quasi experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The populations in this study were all of the Eighth Grade Students of SMPN 1 Jantho and the samples taken were classes VIII-2 and VIII-1 by using the random cluster technique sampling. The data collected wasby using the mathematical reasoning ability test. The result of research through the right-hand t-test statistic test obtained 3.79 > 1.68 then accept Ha reject Ho. Therefore, it was concluded that the students’ mathematical reasoning ability learned through the AIR learning model were higher than those taught conventional learning models. Abstrak Konsep matematika dipelajari di sekolah memerlukan kemampuan penalaran matematis. Namun hasil tes menunjukkan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa masih tergolong rendah. Salah satu alternatif membuat kemampuan penalaran matematis lebih baik melalui model pembelajaran Auditory Intelectually Repetition (AIR). Penelitian ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada siswa yang diajarkan dengan pembelajaran konvensional. Rancangan penelitian menggunakan quasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-posttest control grup design. Populasi dalam penelitian seluruh siswa kelas VIII SMPN 1 Kota Jantho dan sampelnya kelas VIII-2 dan VIII-1 dipilih dengan teknik cluster random sampling. Data yangdikumpulkan dengan menggunakan tes kemampuan penalaran matematis. Hasil penelitian melalui uji statistik uji-t pihak kanan diperoleh thitung > ttabel yaitu 3,79 > 1,68 maka Ha tolak Ho. Disimpulkan bahwa kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa yang diajarkan dengan model AIR lebih baik daripada yang diajarkan denganpembelajaran konvensional.   Kata Kunci: Model Pembelajaran,  Model Air, Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis  

scholarly journals EFFECT OF LEARNING WITH ABDUCTIVE-DEDUCTIVE STRATEGY TOWARDS THE ACHIEVEMENT OF REASONING ABILITY OF HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 111
Author(s):  
Ali Shodikin
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Quantitative Research ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Reasoning Ability ◽  
School Students ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of learning with abductive-deductive strategy towards the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students. Research carried out an experimental pretest-posttest design and the control group was not randomized in class XI student at one high school in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. Data analysis was conducted quantitative research based on early mathematical ability categories (KAM) and overall. The results showed that the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities that students acquire learning abductive-deductive strategy better than students who received the expository learning. In more detail of KAM categories, only middle category that show achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities better. While in upper and under categories have the same reasoning abilities achievements. This research is expected teachers can encourage students to do abduction and deduction in the learning achievement of students’ mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals THE EFFECT OF LEARNING WITH ABDUCTIVE-DEDUCTIVE STRATEGY ON HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS’ REASONING ABILITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Ali Shodikin
Keyword(s):  
High School ◽  
High School Students ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
School Students ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Central Java ◽  
Randomized Control ◽  
Better Than

The purpose of this research is to investigate the effect of learning with abductive-deductive strategy on the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities of high school students. It employed the experimental pretest-posttest with non-randomized control group design to the eleventh grade students of one high school in Pati, Central Java, Indonesia. Data were collected in the form of early mathematical ability categories (EMA) and overall. The results showed that the achievement of mathematical reasoning abilities that students acquire through learning with abductive-deductive strategy was better than that of the students who received were taught with expository learning. In more detail, only students in the medium category of EMA showed better achievement in mathematical reasoning abilities. Meanwhile, students of the upper and lower categories had the same achievements in their reasoning abilities. Based on the findings of the research, it is expected that teachers can encourage students to apply abduction and deduction strategy in order to achieve in mathematical reasoning abilities.

scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USING DRAMA AND SIMULATION TECHNIQUES TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Eva Faliyanti ◽  
Nanda Habib Firdaus
Keyword(s):  
Hypothesis Test ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Significant Degree ◽  
Simulation Technique ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Systematic Random Sampling ◽  
Simulation Techniques ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Better Than

Speaking is one of the productive skills in English. It acts as an important skill which becomes a depiction of students' result in studying English. Oftentimes, English ability is measured by their speaking because it serves a tool of communication which represents the major interaction with other people. But in fact, the condition of a learning process in a sphere of speaking has not supported students to master speaking ability yet. The application of techniques and methods are actually not interesting enough to attract them. Students tend to be passive when they are in learning about material related to speaking.The objectives of this research are; to find out students' speaking score by applying drama technique; to find out students' score by using simulation technique; to find out whether the drama is better than simulation technique in increasing students' speaking ability. The population of this research is 37 students in the fourth semester of English Department at the Muhammadiyah University of Metro. The researcher conducts systematic random sampling design and pre-test and post-test control group design as a research instrument. The result of hypothesis test on test phases both provides the different result which uses 5% significant degree, where a count is higher than t -table on the analysis data of post-test with t-count =2,36  and t-table =2,12. It shows that the students who are taught by drama technique having a higher score. In conclusion that drama technique is more effective than simulation technique in term of students' speaking ability.

scholarly journals The Effect of Using Word Family Game on The Vocabulary Mastery of The Fifth Grade Students at SD Negeri 1 Astina in Academic Years of 2017/2018

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Amelia Kartadi
Keyword(s):  
Fifth Grade ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Fifth Grade Students ◽  
Conventional Teaching ◽  
Post Test ◽  
The Mean ◽  
And Control ◽  
Experimental Group ◽  
Better Than

This study aimed at investigating of the effect of using word family game committed by the fifth grade student in SD Negeri 1 Astina in mastering the English vocabulary. This study was True-Experimental with post-test only control group design. The population was 59 students of the fifth grade and the sample was selected by using cluster random sampling. The sample of this research study was 22 students in 5A as an Experimental Group while 22 students in 5B as a Control Group. The experimental group was taught by using Word Family Game and control group was taught without using Word Family Game. The data was analyzed descriptively and inferentially through SPSS 16.0 Program. Descriptively, the students in experimental group were achieved better than the students in control group. It was proven by the result of the mean score of the experimental group was 90.45, while the mean score of control group was 83.18. The result of the t-test also showed that the score of the (tobs) was 3.393 which the score of (tcv) was 1.682 which based on the degree of freedom was 42. It showed that the (tobs) > (tcv), where: 3.393 > 1.682. It could be concluded that the word family game had a significant effect on the students’ vocabulary mastery rather than using conventional teaching. 

scholarly journals Improvement of Prospective Teacher Mathematics Reasoning Ability Using Numeration Assisted E-Learning

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
Jayanti Jayanti ◽  
Jumroh Jumroh
Keyword(s):  
Prospective Teachers ◽  
Prospective Teacher ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Teaching Staff ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
E Learning ◽  
The Difference

<span lang="IN">This study aims to examine the improvement of prospective teacher Mathematical Reasoning (KPM) abilities through E-Learning-assisted Numeration learning. This study used a quasi-experimental method with a non-equivalent pretest and posttest control group design. The subjects of this study were mathematics prospective teachers at Universitas PGRI Palembang. namely the experimental class which received E-learning assisted numeracy learning (PNBE) and the control class which received conventional learning (PK). Based on the results of the analysis of the difference in the mean difference in the KPM increase of prospective teachers who received PNBE learning and prospective teacher who received conventional learning, the scores from the table of increasing KPM of students who received E-learning-assisted Numeration learning (PNBE) were better than a prospective teacher who received conventional learning. Based on the results of data analysis, it can be concluded that numeracy skills and mathematical reasoning abilities of fourth-semester prospective teacher PGSD at PGRI university are quite good. It is recommended for teaching staff/lecturers to be able to try out this learning model on other mathematical abilities.</span>

Pengaruh Pendekatan Matematika Realistik Terhadap Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika

2019 ◽  
pp. 60-74
Author(s):  
Imelda Simorangkir
Keyword(s):  
Junior High School ◽  
Mathematical Reasoning ◽  
Mathematics Learning ◽  
Student Response ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Equivalent Control ◽  
Linearity Test

The purpose of this study was to look at the effect of realistic mathematics learning on students 'reasoning abilities and to determine students' responses to mathematics learning with realistic mathematical approaches and their relation to mathematical reasoning abilities. This research was conducted at YPAK Galang of Junior High School at 2017/2018 Academic Year. The method used in this study is a quasi-experimental method with the design of Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The sample in this study was 64 students consisting of 32 students for the experimental group and 32 students for the control group. The data analysis technique used in this study is a regression test. Based on the calculation of hypothesis regression linearity test (i) Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected because F_count < F table is -44.40 < 1.88 then the regression form is linear, and for testing the significance of hypothesis regression (ii) Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected because of Fcount > Ftable that is 44.402 > 3.96 means that there is a relationship of variable (X) to varabel (Y). Data collection techniques in the form of a questionnaire consisting of 14 items statement. Based on the calculation of questionnaire data on students 'responses to realistic mathematical learning, the percentage of students' responses that stated yes was 75.38% and the percentage of responses that stated was not 24.62%. This shows that the student response questionnaire is positive.

scholarly journals Adaptive Reasoning Based on Microsoft Mathematics

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 216
Author(s):  
Wati Susilawati ◽  
Tika Karlina Rachmawati ◽  
Ida Nuraida
Keyword(s):  
Interactive Media ◽  
Sampling Technique ◽  
Simple Random Sampling ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Story Problems ◽  
Control Group Design ◽  
Reasoning Abilities ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Mathematical Problems

The demands of professional teachers to design technology-assisted learning that can facilitate all students to develop their potential. the fact that the quality of students' adaptive reasoning in solving math problems is still low which has an impact on other mathematical competencies. The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in the improvement of adaptive reasoning abilities between students who have implemented Search Solving Create and Share learning assisted with Microsoft Mathematics and conventional learning. The method used is quasi-experimental with the non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. Through the Simple Random Sampling technique, two classes were selected, namely class X1 and X2 one of the SMA in Bandung Indonesia. Test instrument: story questions about adaptive reasoning abilities. Analysis using independent T-test data. Result: There is a difference in the improvement in adaptive reasoning abilities between students who using search-solve-create- share learning assisted by Microsoft mathematics compared to conventional learning. Students' difficulties in solving story problems with adaptive reasoning abilities can be minimized by getting used to solving non-routine story problems. Learning search-solve-create-share assisted by Microsoft mathematics accustoms students to convey assumptions, provide reasons for answers, draw conclusions from statements, and students can find patterns of various mathematical problems through multi-interactive media.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document