scholarly journals COMPARATIVE STUDY OF USING DRAMA AND SIMULATION TECHNIQUES TOWARD STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY

2017 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Eva Faliyanti ◽  
Nanda Habib Firdaus

Speaking is one of the productive skills in English. It acts as an important skill which becomes a depiction of students' result in studying English. Oftentimes, English ability is measured by their speaking because it serves a tool of communication which represents the major interaction with other people. But in fact, the condition of a learning process in a sphere of speaking has not supported students to master speaking ability yet. The application of techniques and methods are actually not interesting enough to attract them. Students tend to be passive when they are in learning about material related to speaking.The objectives of this research are; to find out students' speaking score by applying drama technique; to find out students' score by using simulation technique; to find out whether the drama is better than simulation technique in increasing students' speaking ability. The population of this research is 37 students in the fourth semester of English Department at the Muhammadiyah University of Metro. The researcher conducts systematic random sampling design and pre-test and post-test control group design as a research instrument. The result of hypothesis test on test phases both provides the different result which uses 5% significant degree, where a count is higher than t -table on the analysis data of post-test with t-count =2,36  and t-table =2,12. It shows that the students who are taught by drama technique having a higher score. In conclusion that drama technique is more effective than simulation technique in term of students' speaking ability.

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 190-195
Author(s):  
Fitri Ramadhani ◽  
Delima Septiani

Abstract. The purpose of this study was to determine the mathematical communication skills of class VII students at Muhammadiyah Middle School in Pasir Penyu. This type of research is a Quasi Experiment with the design of Randomized Subject Posttest-Only Control Group Design. The data analysis technique in this test uses the t-test. Based on the calculation of the hypothesis test shows the significant value of the sample class is 0.003 <0.05. Based on these results, H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. So it can be concluded that the mathematical communication skills of students using the think talk write learning model is better than the mathematical communication skills of students using conventional learning models in class VII in the middle school Muhammadiyah Pasir Penyu.Keywords: Mathematical Communication, Think Talk Write


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 122
Author(s):  
Ni Komang Amelia Kartadi

This study aimed at investigating of the effect of using word family game committed by the fifth grade student in SD Negeri 1 Astina in mastering the English vocabulary. This study was True-Experimental with post-test only control group design. The population was 59 students of the fifth grade and the sample was selected by using cluster random sampling. The sample of this research study was 22 students in 5A as an Experimental Group while 22 students in 5B as a Control Group. The experimental group was taught by using Word Family Game and control group was taught without using Word Family Game. The data was analyzed descriptively and inferentially through SPSS 16.0 Program. Descriptively, the students in experimental group were achieved better than the students in control group. It was proven by the result of the mean score of the experimental group was 90.45, while the mean score of control group was 83.18. The result of the t-test also showed that the score of the (tobs) was 3.393 which the score of (tcv) was 1.682 which based on the degree of freedom was 42. It showed that the (tobs) > (tcv), where: 3.393 > 1.682. It could be concluded that the word family game had a significant effect on the students’ vocabulary mastery rather than using conventional teaching. 


Jurnal NERS ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20
Author(s):  
Retnayu Pradanie

Introduction: Breastfeeding has been identifi ed as the optimal source of nutrition for infants. However, many mothers do not breastfeed their infants excusively. The possible modifi able factors to improve breastfeeding rates are breastfeeding self effi cacy and effective breastfeeding behavior. The aim of this study was to analyze the breastfeeding support package to improve breastfeeding self effi cacy and impact on effective breastfeeding behavior. Method: This study was a quasy experiment pre-post test non equivalent control group design. Samples were 20 respondents recruited using consecutive sampling in Navy Hospital Dr. Ramelan who met the inclusion criteria. Instruments that used in this study were breastfeeding self effi cacy short form and LATCH assessment tool. Results: The score of breastfeeding self effi cacy on experiment group was improve higher than control group. But, the hypothesis test showed that there were no difference score between experiment and control group after intervention (p = 0.104). The correlation between breastfeeding self effi cacy and effective breastfeeding behavior was not signifi cant (p = 0.976). Analisis and Discussion: The antecedent of breastfeeding self effi cacy were not only the information resources but also job and education level. Breastfeeding self effi cacy was not an antecedent of effective breastfeeding behavior. Keywords: breastfeeding self effi cacy, effective breastfeeding, intervention


2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-24
Author(s):  
Ratni Purwasih ◽  
Ratna Sariningsih

This research is based on the lack of students’ ability in mathematical creative thinking and self concept. For that reason, this study aims to improve the students’ ability of mathematical creative thinking and self-concept through problem-based learning. Using Quasi Experiment method and nonequivalent control group design, this study is included into experimental research. The population of this research is the seventh graders of Junior High School in the district of Cimahi, West Java, Indonesia, and the sampling technique is purposive sampling, with one experimental group which is mathematical learning using problem-based learning (PBM) and one control group which is mathematical learning using conventional onewiththe number of samples in this study were 74 students. The hypothesis test his study is done by using parametric and nonparametric test (t-test and Mann-Whitney). The results showed that mathematical creative thinking and self-concept ability of students who use problem-based learning is better than students who receive conventional learning. Then, the increase of ability and creative thinking of students who use problem-based learning is better than those who receive the conventional learning and their self-concept is classified as being medium


Author(s):  
Siti Sarniah ◽  
Chairul Anwar ◽  
Rizki Wahyu Yunian Putra

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui apakah peningkatan kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa dengan model pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran yang biasa digunakan oleh guru. Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kuantitatif, dengan metode eksperimen semu. Desain yang digunakan adalah Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. Populasinya adalah seluruh siswa kelas VIII di salah satu SMP Lampung Selatan. Simple random sampling merupakan teknik dalam pengambilan sampel pada penelitian ini. Kelas VIII A sebagai kelas eksperimen dan kelas VIII B sebagai kelas kontrol. Berdasarkan hasil uji hipotesis N-gain kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis pada materi relasi dan fungsi diperoleh bahwa kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa dengan model pembelajaran Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) lebih baik dari pada siswa yang menggunakan model pembelajaran biasa. Kata kunci: Auditory Intellectually Repetition, pemahaman konsep.   ABSTRACT This study aims to determine whether the increasing of students mathematical concepts understanding on the class with Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) model is better than on the class with usual learning models. This study is a quantitative research by using the quasi-experimental method. The design is Pretest-Posttest Control Group Design. The population is all of eighth grade students of a Junior High School in South Lampung. Simple random sampling technique is used to get the sample. The VIII A class is the experimental class and VIII B class is the control class. Based on the results of the N-gain hypothesis test of the ability to understand mathematical concepts in relation and function material, the understanding of students' mathematical concepts with the Auditory Intellectually Repetition (AIR) learning model is better than students who use usual learning models. Keywords: Auditory Intellectually Repetition, concept understanding.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ni Made Dwi Antari ◽  
Ketut Agustini ◽  
Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana

AbstrakPembelajaran TIK hendaknya dapat menyiapkan kondisi yang mendukung agar aktivitas dan kreativitas siswa memperoleh pengetahuan sendiri melalui proses belajar. Pemilihan model pembelajaran yang tepat sesuai karakteristik siswa akan membantu keberhasilan suatu pembelajaran. Penelitian studi komparatif akan membandingkan dua model pembelajaran, untuk mengetahui model manakah yang lebih baik. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mengetahui(1) Pengaruh hasil belajar TIK siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Seririt dengan menggunakan model pembelajaran Talking Stick dan Snowball Throwing, (2) Hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi antara model pembelajaran Talking Stick atau Snowball Throwing, (3) respon siswa terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran Talking Stick  dan Snowball Throwing.Jenis penelitian ini adalah eksperimen semu dengan rancangan Post Test Only With Non Equivalent Control Group Design. Pengumpulan data dilakukandenganmetodetespilihangandauntukmengukurranahkognitifdanujiketerampilanuntukranahPsikomotor. Data hasilbelajardianalisismelaluiujiprasyarat yaitu uji normalitas dan homogenitas dengan hasil ketiga kelompok berdistribusi normal dan homogen, dilanjutkan dengan ujihipotesismenggunakan Anova Satu jalur lalu dilanjutkan dengan uji berpasangan t-Scheffe.Hasil uji anova satu jalur menyatakan terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan dalam penggunaan model pembelajaran Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing, dan konvensional. Karena terdapat pengaruh yang signifikan maka dilanjutkan dengan uji t-Scheffe dengan hasil terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara masing-masing pasangan. Kemudian dilihat dari rata-rata hasil belajar disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran Talking Stick lebih baik dengan rata-rata hasil belajar yang lebih tinggi. Sedangkanuntukresponmenggunakanmetodeangket. Hasil analisis angket model Talking Stick diketahui 36% respon sangat positif, 61% respon positif dan 3% respon cukup positif. Sedangkan untuk model Snowball Throwing diketahui 25% respon sangat positif, 67% respon positif dan 8% respon cukup positif. Kata kunci:  Studi Komparatif, TIK, Talking Stick, Snowball Throwing,  hasil belajar, dan respon siswa AbstractTIK learning must have to prepared student’s activities and creativities to obtained the own knowledge by means of learning process. An appropriate learning model election agree with students characteristics would help an success learning. The comparative study research would have to compared both of learning model, to know which model was better. This research aimed to know (1) The influenced about the result of students’ TIK study used Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model (2) the highest result of study between Talking stick and Snowball Throwinglearning model (3) the students’ response toward Talking stick and Snowball Throwing learning model application.Kind of this research was quasi experiment by Post Test Only with Non Equivalent Control Group Design. The data accumulation done by multiple choice tests to measured cognitive domain and skill test to psychomotor domain. The students’ result study analyzed by prerequisite test was normality test and homogeneity by the result of the three group which normal distribution and homogeneous, continued by hypothesis test used a strip Anova then continued by t-SheffeThe result of one way onova exist a significance influenced on the used of Talking Stick leaarning model, Snowball Throwing and conventional. Because of thee was a significance difereences between each partner. Afterwards, seen from the result average of study  can be concluded the Talking Stick learning model better than the higest result average of study. Meanwhile, the respond of used questionnaire method, the result of Talking stick model questionnaire known 36% very positive responses, 61% positive responses and 3% positive sufficient responses. Then, Snowball Throwing model known 25% very positive responses, 67% positive responses, and 8% positive sufficient responses. Keywords : The Comparrative Study, TIK, Talking stick, Snowball Throwing, the                   study result,  students’ respond


This study aims to examine the effect of reciprocal instruction and interpersonal intelligence on student learning outcomes. This research was conducted on UHO PGSD students who programmed the subject of Social Sciences elementary school in 2018/2019. This study used a quasiexperimental method, with a non-equivalent post-test control group design. The research sample was taken with simple random techniques. The experimental class and the control class each consisted of 47 students. The experimental class is taught with reciprocal learning models while the controls are traditional learning models. Each class was taken 27% or 26 students from each class as a sample. The sample determination was based on the division of high and low interpersonal intelligence, each of 27% of the total population. So that the total sample as a whole is 52 students. Before being given treatment, the two classes were first given an interpersonal intelligence questionnaire to obtain high and low intelligence data. Data on learning outcomes are obtained through multiple choice form tests. Before use, the questionnaire instrument and the test were first validated by content and constructs by education and psychology experts. then an empirical test is carried out, the result is a validity value of 0.91 and a reliability of 0.93. The research data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential analysis. Hypothesis testing is carried out with 2 way ANOVA. Then the normality and homogeneity tests were carried out as a prerequisite test for the hypothesis test. Furthermore, if there is interaction, further testing is carried out with the HSD test to find out the main effects of the treatment. Data processing results of this study were carried out with the help of the SPSS 20. The results showed that there were differences in student learning outcomes taught by reciprocal and traditional models. Furthermore, there is an interaction between learning models and interpersonal intelligence. Students who have high interpersonal intelligence have better learning outcomes than students who have low interpersonal intelligence. Thus it can be concluded that students who have high interpersonal intelligence taught by reciprocal models have better learning outcomes than students taught with traditional models


2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nurbaiti Rindang Utami ◽  
Yayuk Andayani ◽  
Muntari Muntari

Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran berbasis proyek terhadap prestasi belajar kimia siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Narmada Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian eksperimen semu dengan rancangan post test only control group design. Pengambilan sampel dilakukan dengan teknik cluster random sampling karena anggota populasi sudah homogen berdasarkan data nilai ujian semester ganjil siswa kelas XI IPA. Kelas XI IPA 1 sebagai kelas eksperimen menggunakan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek dan kelas XI IPA 3 sebagai kelas kontrol menggunakan model pembelajaran konvensional. Post test digunakan sebagai instrumen utama penelitian, selain itu portofolio juga digunakan sebagai instrumen kedua penelitian ini. Hasil uji beda (uji-t) post test dengan taraf signifikan 5% menunjukkan thitung (4,105) > ttabel (2,000) sehingga H0 ditolak. Uji-t dilakukan juga pada hasil portofolio yang menunjukkan thitung (2,89) > ttabel (2,000). Berdasarkan kedua hasil tersebut, dapat disimpulkan bahwa model pembelajaran berbasis proyek memberikan pengaruh yang lebih baik dibandingkan dengan model konvensional terhadap prestasi belajar kimia siswa kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Narmada Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014.Kata Kunci: Model pembelajaran berbasis proyek, prestasi belajar kimia Abstract: The objective of the research was to know the effect of Project-Based Learning towards the student’s chemistry learning achievement class XI IPA of SMAN 1 Narmada in 2013/2014 academic year. This research used a quasi-experimental research design with the design of post-test only control group design. Sampling was done by cluster random sampling technique because members of populations have homogeneous based on data value semester exams of class XI science students. Class XI IPA 1 as experimental group was threated by project-based learning model and class XI IPA 3 as control group was threated by conventional learning models. Post test is used as an basic instrument. In addition, the portofolio is as a second instrument of this research.. The results of post-test hypothesis test using a different test (t-test) with a significance level of 5% showed tacc (4.105)> ttable (2.000) so that H0 is rejected. Hypothesis testing is also performed on the results of portfolio show tacc (2.89)> ttable (2.000). Based on these results, we can conclude that project-based learning model provides give a better effect than the conventional models of the student’s chemistrylearning achievement class XI IPA of SMAN 1 Narmada in 2013/2014 academic year.Keywords:     project-based learning model, the students’s chemistry achievement learning


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 162
Author(s):  
Putu Tressya Susanti

This study aimed at investigating whether or not there was a significant effect of using Word Clap Game on the vocabulary mastery of the fifth grade students of SD Negeri 1 Banjar Jawa. The research was true experimental with Post-test Only Control Group Design. The population was the fifth grade students of SD Negeri 1 Banjar Jawa. Cluster Random Sampling was assigned to select the sample of the study. The samples were 30 students at grade 5A for experimental group and 30 students at grade 5B for control group. Those two groups were determined by lottery. The experimental group was taught by using Word Clap Game and the control group was taught by using conventional teaching technique. The data were analyzed by using T-test through SPSS program. The result of the data analysis showed that students in experimental group performed better than the students in control group. It was proven by the result of the descriptive statistics that showed the mean score of the experimental group was 89,33 while the mean score of the control group was 84,67. The result of the t-test also showed that the value of the tobs was greater than the tcv where the tobs was 2,586 while the tcv was 1,672. Based on the findings, it was concluded that there was a significant effect of using word clap game on the students’ vocabulary mastery rather than using conventional teaching. 


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 199
Author(s):  
Kartini Kartini ◽  
Sujarwo Sujarwo

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui: (1) perbedaan kreativitas anak usia dini pada pembelajaran sebelum dan sesudah menggunaka media plastisin, (2) perbedaan kreativitas antara kelompok anak yang diajarkan dengan media plastisin dan media balok di TK Aisyiyah Bustanul Athfal 5 Mataram. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kuasi eksperimen dengan desain pretest-posttest control group design. Teknik observasi digunakan untuk mengetahui kreativitas anak. Teknik analisis data menggunakan uji T-test. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa: (1) ada perbedaan kreativitas anak usia dini pada pembelajaran sebelum dan sesudah menggunakan media plastisin. (2) ada perbedaan yang signifikan mengenai kreativitas anak antara kelompok eksperimen dengan kelompok kontrol. Perolehan mean kreativitas eksperimen lebih besar dari pada mean kelompok kontrol yaitu 37,00 > 31,17. Hasil uji-t data posttest kemampuan kreativitas kelompok kontrol dan kelompok eksperimen menunjukkan bahwa nilai t-tabel dengan derajat bebas (df) 34 dengan taraf signifikansi  α = 0,05 adalah sebesar 2,032. Nilai t- hitung 3,389 > t-tabel 2,032 dan nilai p-value 0,000< taraf signifikansi 0,05.Kata Kunci: penggunaan, media plastisin, kreativitas anak usia dini THE USE OF PLASTISIN MEDIA IN IMPROVING CHILDREN CREATIVITYAbstractThis research aims to know: (1) there are the differences of early childhood creativity of learning before and after using Plastisin, (2) the differences of creativity in learning by using Plastisin and Block of children group at TK Aisyiyah Bustanul Athfal 5 Mataram. This research used quasi-experiment with pretest-posttest control group design. The data collection technique used observation. Analysis data technique was done with T-test. The result of the research was (1) There are differences of early childhood creativities in learning before and after using plastisin media. (2) There are significance differences between creativities the experiment and control group. Creativity experiment mean was bigger than control group 37.00 > 31.17. The result of T-test data from post-test, the creativity ablity of control and experiment group showed that t-table with standard deviation (df) 34 with significance α = 0.05 was 2.032. t-count score 3.389>t-table 2.032 and p-value 0.000 < significance 0.05.Keywords: the use of, plastisin media, children creativity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document